Military Review

The ships of the Black Sea Fleet conducted a maritime combat as part of the exercise.

34
Ships of the Black Sea fleet as part of the exercises in the Mediterranean Sea, they held a counter battle and worked out the organization of collective defense against air attack weapons, reports Interfax Post press service of the Black Sea Fleet.

The ships of the Black Sea Fleet conducted a maritime combat as part of the exercise.


Five warships consisting of two groups held a sea battle and exercises for the radiation, chemical and biological protection of ships,
says release.

These tasks were worked out “after the first stages of the convoy operation, training for organizing collective defense against enemy air attack, anti-submarine and anti-sabotage defenses”.

The press service added that in the Mediterranean Sea "the planned test of tactical exercises of the Black Sea Fleet surface ships division with the permanent naval forces in the far sea zone continues."

And in the Caspian Sea, an exercise was conducted to repel an attack by a terrorist group on a communications center of the flotilla.

According to the legend of the exercises, a terrorist group of ten fighters is conducting reconnaissance of approaches to the communications center of the flotilla in order to further capture and disable all existing communication lines,
told the press service of the Southern Military District.

It is reported that "the personnel of the duty subunit of the communications center and the anti-terror unit - the mouth-tactical group of the marines" were involved in repelling the training terrorist attack.

There were also worked out introductory medical services for a soldier who was wounded during mine clearance by an explosive device.
Photos used:
http://vkrizis.ru
34 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 26 May 2017 14: 21
    +2
    An interesting teaching, "escort operation", "oncoming battle" ... We are training to break through to Tartus or evacuate it?
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 26 May 2017 14: 34
      +4
      About this, let the head of NATO analysts hurt ...
      1. svp67
        svp67 26 May 2017 14: 36
        +6
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        About this, let the head of NATO analysts hurt ...

        They have it all right with this "headache" ... Since it is OUR. And unfortunately, while the straits are completely controlled by NATO and will remain so ...
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 26 May 2017 14: 38
          +4
          Quote: svp67
          And unfortunately, while the straits are completely controlled by NATO and will remain so ...

          I do not argue . But they should not relax - go, understand this "mysterious Russian soul."
    2. okko077
      okko077 26 May 2017 14: 43
      +2
      It is interesting how modern warfare is consistent with the “oncoming battle” of ships. Yes, you can assume this type: in actions against pirates, in a demonstration of force in conflict zones, but this is without fighting ... In my understanding, such a battle can not be considered as a training exercise. Again, window dressing, wall to wall again, Stone Age .... How the battle will take place, what kind of contact can be discussed ... Someone in this fleet may think about this in this army ... or there are not enough brains. The basis of the battle is the detection of the enemy without visual contact, I found it means he won .... And on the other hand, we know where the enemy is, or we don’t have such systems that monitor, or rather monitor the enemy’s ships ... In a modern war, a ship is target, no more, or a floating battery, simple or missile. A surface fleet can only carry out police functions .... In my understanding, the teachings come down to finding targets, that’s what you need to train. Detect, or rather choose from a list that is constantly monitored, clarify more accurate coordinates, select ships with a zone of possible destruction and destroy, while minimizing the retaliatory strike, Yes, again, Battle Information Systems, only of a global nature ... But we don’t have them .... here we are working out what we can work out - oncoming battle of ships, oncoming battle of tanks, oncoming battle of infantry in Ratnik with Sagittarius ... Only there are not enough horsemen, history doesn’t teach anything ....
      1. Serg65
        Serg65 26 May 2017 14: 56
        +4
        Quote: okko077
        morons history does not teach anything ....

        repeat Oh, you are so smart !!!! good At least two academies of the General Staff! wassat
        1. svp67
          svp67 26 May 2017 15: 50
          +2
          Quote: Serg65
          Oh, you are so smart !!!!

          Boy ... young one. We are “starters” for him, but he knows everything, knows everything. That's just stupid yet.
          1. okko077
            okko077 26 May 2017 16: 11
            +2
            At 60, still young, not bad. And moreover, stupid, because he believes, because it is necessary ... And the most important thing is not stupid, right, the youngest?
            1. svp67
              svp67 26 May 2017 16: 13
              +1
              Quote: okko077
              At 60, still young, not bad.

              Already bad ... Since it is clear that he did not grow out of children's pants ...
          2. KaPToC
            KaPToC 26 May 2017 16: 28
            +1
            Quote: svp67
            Boy ... young one.

            Google "math joke" on YouTube.
            About 28 tanks, just about such a kid and starters.
            1. svp67
              svp67 26 May 2017 16: 40
              +1
              Quote: KaPToC
              About 28 tanks, just about such a kid and starters.

              There is a man with a head and a joke about the fact that from situations created by a stupid commander, one must look for a way out to victory, and not shout that everything has disappeared.
              1. KaPToC
                KaPToC 26 May 2017 18: 22
                0
                Quote: svp67
                a joke about what and from situations created by a stupid commander

                For the gifted, looking for a black cat in a black room that is not there, they specifically wrote in the title that it was a mathematical anecdote, not a psychological parable.
                A joke about how something we are taught in educational institutions differs from real life.
                1. svp67
                  svp67 26 May 2017 18: 26
                  +1
                  Quote: KaPToC
                  For the gifted, looking for a black cat in a black room that is not there, they specifically wrote in the title that it was a mathematical anecdote, not a psychological parable.

                  Oh, what all became MIND ... Remember or remember, folk wisdom: The tale is a lie, but there is a hint in it - a lesson for good fellows.
                  Quote: KaPToC
                  A joke about how something we are taught in educational institutions differs from real life.

                  You are the first in the Captain Evidence nomination. And I don’t remember something that would be taught in LIFE educational institutions, and even taught real ... She has completely different "universities and teachers"
                  1. KaPToC
                    KaPToC 26 May 2017 18: 36
                    +1
                    Quote: svp67
                    Captain obvious

                    Is it like the last word is yours? Have you written all this?
                    I'm confused.
        2. In100gram
          In100gram 26 May 2017 22: 44
          0
          Quote: Serg65
          The basis of the battle is the detection of the enemy without visual contact, discovered - means he won.

          You can joke as much as you like, but a healthy grain in the quote above. read carefully
      2. Vladimir Postnikov
        Vladimir Postnikov 26 May 2017 15: 26
        +1
        Quote: okko077
        Again window dressing, wall to wall again, stone age ...

        New methods require new tools. New tools require capabilities.
        Why ask these childhood questions?
        If there is no opportunity, then there is no means. If there are no new tools, then the methods remain old, for the old tools.
        There are nuclear weapons. This weapon has not yet been used seriously.
        The people on old means need something to do, otherwise their roof will go from idleness.
        Better than nothing.
        1. svp67
          svp67 26 May 2017 15: 54
          +1
          Quote: Vladimir Postnikov
          New methods require new tools. New tools require capabilities.

          And the situation is such that you don’t have to wait, so you have to get ready to fight with what you have ...
        2. okko077
          okko077 26 May 2017 16: 02
          +3
          The arguments are not bad, but I don’t agree .. There are opportunities, a lot of money is not needed ... There is no understanding, there is no determination to change something from the general. You have to work, you need to make decisions, there will be mistakes, you have to answer, because the matter is new .. . It is better to work out the oncoming battle, which will not happen, will be the extermination of our army on the way to the enemy .... It’s mean and dreary, stupid, and here officers and contract soldiers who honestly do their duty ... Let the astronauts with binoculars, consider the ships accurate to km, they write in pencil in a notebook and transfer to the ground, at least some benefit will be. Everyone will see this circus, think about it, they can see clearly ... After all, you need to know where the aircraft carrier groups are, where the ships, submarines ... And you won’t hide yourself with the enemy .. and you won’t say that we have everything, but you don’t know .. ..
          1. KaPToC
            KaPToC 26 May 2017 16: 30
            0
            Quote: okko077
            which will not be, will be the extermination of our army on the way to the enemy ....

            And what kind of miracle weapons will the enemy destroy our army and navy, especially the fleet once an article about ships?
          2. Vladimir Postnikov
            Vladimir Postnikov 26 May 2017 17: 33
            0
            Quote: okko077
            The arguments are not bad, but I do not agree .. There are opportunities, a lot of money is not needed ...

            You have the right to disagree. You can not even argue. But it would be better if you provide arguments.
            By opportunities, I understood both production capabilities, technological capabilities, and the ability to conduct high-quality R&D, and, finally, economic opportunities. I don’t mention money because it only reflects economic opportunities.
            How are things with economic ones? GDP is not growing. Why is it not growing? As if sanctions were announced to us, we should deal with import substitution and, thereby, increase GDP, and he, such a had, still does not grow. If GDP does not grow, then at whose expense will new ships be built? At the expense of retirees? Due to education? At the expense of health?
            For other features have something to say? Are production capacities underloaded somewhere? I would like to know why? If technological capabilities allow, then what are we suddenly buying components in China? There is no desire to talk about R&D. Then Rubin sawed Fuel Cells, sawed, sawed. What do we have in the end? Nobody knows. Reforming with them, you see, doesn't roll. But, reforming is a completely different process, which has nothing to do with the Fuel Elements. Is the TE installation itself ready? Nobody knows.
            There is no understanding, no determination to change something at the generals.

            But what does the general have to do with everything I said above? A soldier must be able to fight with what is, and not by what is not.
          3. Oleg Monarchist
            Oleg Monarchist 26 May 2017 18: 23
            0
            Let the astronauts with binoculars, count the ships to the nearest km and write with a pencil in a notebook and transfer them to the ground, at least there will be some benefit.


            Yeah ... and let BoNba throw on the adversary laughing You're a genius, bro. laughing
      3. svp67
        svp67 26 May 2017 15: 46
        +1
        Quote: okko077
        I wonder how modern warfare is consistent with the "oncoming battle" of ships

        Yes, we are “starters”, it seems that we better understand what our fleet is preparing for than “young and early”, whose consciousness and mind are more “blinded” than among old people.
        How do you imagine the oncoming battle of ships in modern conditions? it will occur at extreme distances, when the ships visually will not see each other for sure, but it will be a “oncoming battle”, since the paths of our convoys are known.
        1. okko077
          okko077 26 May 2017 16: 27
          +2
          When in the distant 1985 in the classroom with ITS in terms of preparing for a research test to bring the aviation regiment to a higher degree of combat readiness, I conducted a lesson and suddenly noticed that they were listening to me, that the rumble was interesting and specialists. At the end of the lesson, the almost forty-year-old captain, a link technician, got up and said in surprise, that is how we always do it, that it turns out to be right and the first time he heard that the plan is almost true, that the graphs are similar to the truth and he understands everything .... It should always be ....
          1. svp67
            svp67 26 May 2017 16: 42
            +1
            Quote: okko077
            It should always be ....

            Wean, it won’t be like this ...
          2. Oleg Monarchist
            Oleg Monarchist 26 May 2017 18: 35
            0
            okko077 more people like us here like you ... and he fumbles in aviation (not a question) and will command the fleet, and with artillery on “YOU”, and the tank will dismantle the cogs and lead the tank attack. Straight and the Shvets and the reaper and the dude in the pipe .... Admiral Field Marshal and Honored Pilot Tanker of the entire Navy. good
      4. KaPToC
        KaPToC 26 May 2017 16: 26
        +1
        Quote: okko077
        Again, window dressing, again wall to wall, Stone Age ....

        It has always been and always will be - wall to wall. Stone axes fly farther and farther - which pushes the walls apart, but nothing has fundamentally changed and will not change.
        Quote: okko077
        In modern warfare, a ship is a target, no more, or a floating battery, simple or missile.

        Are you so kidding? And what did the non-modern warships do? Cinema showed or a polka-butterfly danced?
        Quote: okko077
        Yes, again, the Combat Information Systems, only of a global nature ...

        All this works well in peacetime, during a local conflict with a knowingly weaker and smaller enemy.
        Quote: okko077
        Only there are not enough horsemen, history doesn’t teach anything morons ....

        Wah wah, why do you say that? Who is missing? Why not enough? There are horsemen, did not go anywhere. And we and the adversary.
        1. cost
          cost 26 May 2017 18: 59
          +1
          I still remember such a thing, that the oncoming battle is not only a variant of the offensive battle, during which each of the opposing sides seeks to seize the initiative, but also the desire of the weaker side to expand the length of the theater of operations. I am not a sailor, but it seems to me that the navy is fulfilling precisely this scenario. IMHO
          1. KaPToC
            KaPToC 26 May 2017 19: 07
            0
            Quote: Rich
            I still remember such a thing, that the oncoming battle is not only a variant of the offensive battle, during which each of the opposing sides seeks to seize the initiative, but also the desire of the weaker side to expand the length of the theater of operations.

            The Americans came up with a non-contact war, and it struck Komko comrade okko077 in the head, and the Americans themselves have not yet defeated anyone without contact.
            The cowards of war do not win.
  2. Astart
    Astart 26 May 2017 14: 24
    +1
    "Western partners" (as I like this expression, either Putin, or Lavrov ... you just need to choose the right intonation) So the "Western partners" are used to considering the Mediterranean Sea, NATO’s internal lake, And here the Russians are playing war games. Here they are
  3. Topotun
    Topotun 26 May 2017 14: 26
    +1
    And at first I understood how the oncoming battle of ship groupings. It even became interesting how it was - a counter battle using RCC ....
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 26 May 2017 14: 32
    0
    ... like in aviation - they carried out a frontal attack ... on a campaign, it’s useful ...
  5. pol-smit.smit
    pol-smit.smit 26 May 2017 16: 19
    +1
    like a military review, not a tape, ru, but why put left photos, the times of the USSR ??
  6. bald
    bald 26 May 2017 20: 22
    0
    Situations can arise all sorts of, not predictable. Therefore, any teachings are teachings. They will not pass through ashes, but will save lives. And the more legends worked out - this is only a plus and a notch above professionalism.
  7. 3 Gradient
    3 Gradient 27 May 2017 01: 01
    0
    Combat training ...
    Before .. In Soviet times ...
    It was in the order of things ...