Sergei Rudskoy: "The militants in Syria lost about 6,8 thousand killed and wounded"

48
The first deputy chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Colonel-General Sergei Rudskoy, reported on the results of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Force to support the Syrian government army today. According to Sergei Rudsky, Syrian troops continue to actively advance in the province of Ham. Over the past few days, terrorist groups have been dropped on 15 km from the city of Hama. We are talking about a large group of militants, consisting of various gangs of about 10 thousands.

He was informed by General Rudskoy about the damage in manpower and equipment that the militants had inflicted on the Syrian army and allies with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces lately.

Sergei Rudskoy: "The militants in Syria lost about 6,8 thousand killed and wounded"


Sergey Rudskoy:
The losses of the militants were more than 6800 people killed and wounded. 68 armored vehicles were also destroyed, 22 “jihad-mobile” (for reference, jihad-mobiles are cars that are filled with explosives by militants and sent to commit suicide attacks). This year a large group of ISIL (* banned in the Russian Federation) north of Aleppo has been crushed. The offensive of the government forces in the northeast of this province is successfully developing. government forces freed 41 gangs from a populated area and reached areas southwest of the city of Manbij under the control of Kurdish self-defense units
.

At the same time, General Rudskoy actually did not confirm the statements made by representatives of the Russian Foreign Ministry that Russia had resumed the memorandum on ensuring flight safety in the airspace of Syria, previously concluded with the United States. According to Sergey Rudsky, hotline phones between military departments are working to prevent incidents in the air of the UAR.

Rudskoy:
We hope that in the future we will be able to resolve the contradictions and organize closer cooperation (with the United States).


The memorandum was suspended after a US missile attack on Shairat airbase.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 26 2017 17: 14
    I’m wondering how they were counted.
    1. +9
      April 26 2017 17: 20
      Quote: Pirogov
      I’m wondering how they were counted.

      Well, that’s not a problem at all. The generals of any army in the world can perfectly calculate the damage done to the enemy at their headquarters. Do not believe the numbers? So go to the battlefields and recount wink .
      1. +4
        April 26 2017 17: 22
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        Well, that’s not a problem at all. The generals of any army in the world can perfectly calculate the damage done to the enemy at their headquarters. Do not believe the numbers? So go to the fighting fields and recount yourself

        I remember a joke about Suvorov, and what regret these Basurmans))))
      2. +2
        April 26 2017 17: 52
        I remember that in September 2014, in his reports on this site, Girkin indicated the number of ~ 30000 ukrov destroyed by the militia, ~ 600 tanks and up to ~ 1500 infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers. considered laughing But seriously, the enemy’s losses are determined not by Tsferi, but by his ability to take active actions and defense. In short, in terms of activity, but no one knows for sure ...
        1. +2
          April 26 2017 18: 24
          Quote: LostCoast
          I remember that in September 2014, in his reports on this site, Girkin indicated the number of ~ 30000 ukrov destroyed by the militia, ~ 600 tanks and up to ~ 1500 infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers.
          bring the source where he said this
          1. 0
            April 26 2017 18: 27
            https://topwar.ru/57425-svodki-ot-opolcheniya-nov
            orossii-za-2-sentyabrya-2014-goda.html bon appetit
            1. +4
              April 26 2017 18: 30
              Quote: LostCoast
              https://topwar.ru/57425-svodki-ot-opolcheniya-nov
              orossii-za-2-septyabrya-2014-goda.html

              Well, where are the reports from Strelkova, personally? Do you really want to kick the hero once again?
              1. 0
                April 26 2017 18: 38
                For September 2014 there is something like that somewhere, it’s not important for me to look for scrap. I know that I saw it too. Think what you want
                1. +1
                  April 27 2017 03: 39
                  Lied. my friend, you are not going to apologize for your depravity?
                  How to find dill on the net - he will definitely call Strelkova Girkin
                  1. 0
                    April 27 2017 14: 10
                    Quote: znavel
                    Lied. my friend, you are not going to apologize for your depravity?
                    How to find dill on the net - he will definitely call Strelkova Girkin

                    You yourself are dill, okay?
              2. 0
                April 27 2017 14: 10
                “During four months of fights, punishers lost 43 thousand 27 people. Of these, 27 888 people were killed or injured, 1649 were taken prisoner and 13 500 deserted or were missing. The losses were also suffered by PMCs, the DPR operational headquarters reported. Most of all in battles lost "Right Sector" - more than 7 thousand killed and wounded. Most of them were members of the National Guard under. 1649 PS members were captured. Donbass, Aidar, Azov and Kherson battalions and others lost lost and wounded 6168 people. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), encroaching on the freedom of Donbass residents, lost 115 people. 460 fighters lost an hour The largest military companies lost the most and the Polish ASBS Othago - 194 man and the American Assademi - 160 man. The total losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces were 14889 soldiers, including 120 militiamen. Also, the FNI and CIA were reported at the headquarters of the militia 25 killed by US special services. For four months, Kiev lost the 43 aircraft and the 22 helicopter, as well as six UAVs. The militia managed to destroy 448 tanks, 827 BTR, BMP and BMD, 37 "Gradov", 19 "Hurricanes" and around 100 units of different artillery, "according to the data of the DNR headquarters."
                1. 0
                  April 30 2017 01: 11
                  And what doesn’t suit you here? 43 thousand are not only killed, but also wounded. In addition, the article refers to a message from journalists. Exaggeration could also take place, although that rusty army could well lose such numbers of people, only wounded and deserters. Do not agree, citizen dill?
        2. 0
          April 27 2017 14: 33
          Do not grind nonsense. The wise men of your mentality already got it. Your school where you studied is out of date. Do you really not understand the difference between 5 people fighting or 000. 500 Spartans also resisted, but that’s the point. Only with the total destruction of manpower and their leaders, is victory possible. and then our VKS shahidmobiles got the hell out in the evening. And in the morning the pack of busurman runs to the attack and takes up positions. Well, they will throw 300 companies of paratroopers in the rear, well, they will blow up an air defense point with an airfield. They will not return back, because there are few of them to resist
    2. +3
      April 26 2017 17: 22
      Quote: Pirogov
      I’m wondering how they were counted.

      He didn’t count which simply “evaporated” under the blows of the air forces ... But otherwise, the snipers worked and documented ..
    3. 0
      April 26 2017 17: 27
      I can assume - by the presence of remnants of shahid belts around the world + unaccounted for (as always, with a finger to the sky).
    4. +2
      April 26 2017 17: 54
      Pirogov - from hell esemasci came how many pans are occupied in hell lol knowing the exact capacity of each infernal pan laughing get the number of blind men from igil fool
    5. +3
      April 26 2017 18: 03
      Pirogov: I'm wondering, but how were they counted?

      And what was the population census for? The scribes reached each IG unit Yes
      1. +1
        April 26 2017 18: 46
        The question is - rewrote by the number of brains, or by the presence of that same squeak (from you filed the word CORRESPONDENCE)?
        1. +1
          April 26 2017 18: 56
          I can not answer your question. Since, although I asked for scribes, they did not take me - they argued with my poor literacy sad
  2. +2
    April 26 2017 17: 15
    I wonder how much this figure should be divided? And in general, does this have any reality? In a war everyone lies. And godlessly.
    1. +11
      April 26 2017 17: 23
      good I agree with you and with Bismarck ... wink
    2. +2
      April 26 2017 18: 27
      Quote: mitrich
      I wonder how much this figure should be divided? And in general, does this have any reality? In a war everyone lies. And godlessly.
      In this war, only the final conditions of victory make sense, and not the number of bearded men killed. For for such wars, this is not an indicator at all, you can recall the killed Mujahideen in Afghanistan, or how many Vietnamese Yankees crushed there - it turned out to be useless ?!
    3. +1
      April 26 2017 19: 00
      Well, you, not all. Now our friends Jews will come and tell us in detail what should be divided by 10. And 100% true info on the losses of the enemy only among Jews, they are such Jews, well, very honest.
  3. 0
    April 26 2017 17: 18
    There were 10 thousand advancing militants, no more. They attributed such a feeling.
  4. +4
    April 26 2017 17: 19
    What kind of interaction with the us can be discussed? I can not understand how. Can someone explain? The United States created it and it acts in the interests of the United States. So how will they interact with us? Destroy your brainchild?
    1. +1
      April 26 2017 17: 33
      You and I did not stand with a candle when the States, or anyone else conceived this, but it is definitely not the States that will fight it. Europe, this is just the beginning. Did not expect amerЗsome analysts of such a development of events.
  5. +2
    April 26 2017 17: 35
    I wonder why never voiced how many civilians were killed? There are no sterile wars. When the cities are bombed, it’s not just the militants who die besides the militants. In the absence of officially announced figures, one has to refer to the organization Amnesty International that I do not like.
    1. +1
      April 26 2017 17: 37
      To whom and who entrusted this question?
      1. +2
        April 26 2017 18: 17
        Quote: avg-mgn
        To whom and who entrusted this question?

        Said "A," say, and "B."
        Sergey Rudskoy: Losses of militants amounted to more than 6800 people killed and wounded. Also destroyed 68 units of armored vehicles, 22 "jihad mobile"

        Rudskoy said that since the start of the military operation in Syria, the aerospace forces of Russia have made more than 23 thousand sorties and inflicted about 77 thousand airstrikes on militant positions.

        And how much collateral damage, Mr. Rudskoy?

        Quote: Expelling Liberoids
        Professor Oleg, a hedgehog it’s clear that many hundreds of thousands of civilians died, but the war is on, and it’s just pointless to count the dead, because every day there are more of them.

        It’s not beautiful to smear the snot about the bombing by Americans of every wedding with them and keep silent about their “exploits”. I am for justice and against Amnesty.
        1. +5
          April 26 2017 18: 50
          Yes, stop it ... Having destroyed several militants in the same Gaza Strip by airstrike or army operation, for example, you might think that you count the number of children, women and the elderly who died in this ... This, after all, is just the cost of fighting terror for Israel ,true?
          1. +2
            April 26 2017 19: 27
            Quote: MPK105
            Yes, stop it ... Having destroyed several militants in the same Gaza Strip by airstrike or army operation, for example, you might think that you count the number of children, women and the elderly who died in this ... This, after all, is just the cost of fighting terror for Israel ,true?

            Of course we think. And not only the military themselves, but also the prosecutor's office. If we do not count, then the Hague will be engaged in it. That is precisely because we ourselves carefully consider that I have no confidence in Amnesty’s calculations.

            Quote: lonely
            Only one thing is not clear: these 6,8 thousand destroyed were killed only in the Hama region, or this number was destroyed from the day when the VKS first began to bomb in Syria.

            In Hama. Previously, the voices of the destroyed EMNIP militants of tens of thousands were voiced. Otherwise, 77 airstrikes on 000 fighters are already very inefficient.
            1. +3
              April 26 2017 19: 36
              Who, besides you, believes your calculations, is it interesting? But The Hague is a strong argument for the Slavs ... Especially after Milosevic ... "77 air strikes on 000 militants are not very effective ...." Here I agree .. . And they go straight ... And they think under fire ... Well, it’s not funny to yourself, no ...?
              1. +3
                April 26 2017 19: 50
                Quote: MPK105
                Who, besides you, believes your calculations, I wonder?

                He believes it because he was never caught in a lie, unlike our opponents.

                Quote: MPK105
                But the Hague is a strong argument for the Slavs ... Especially, after Milosevic ...

                And you ask Milosevic, is this a strong argument or not?

                Quote: MPK105
                "77 airstrikes on 000 militants are not very effective ...." I agree here ... And they’ll go straight ... And they’ll consider it under fire ... Well, it’s not funny to yourself, no ...?

                Sad Assessing the damage caused to the enemy is a paramount task. Once 6800 militants counted, it means peaceful ones too. And if you didn’t consider the peace yourself, then Amnesty will count. sad
                1. +5
                  April 26 2017 19: 56
                  No, you didn’t understand (I didn’t make it clear here) -And they’re going straight ... And they think under fire ... Well, it’s not funny to myself, no ...? - I’m talking about your heroic prosecutors who, risking their lives consider Arabs killed by Israel. wink .
                  1. +2
                    April 27 2017 06: 51
                    Quote: MPK105
                    No, you didn’t understand (I didn’t make it clear here) -And they’re going straight ... And they think under fire ... Well, it’s not funny to myself, no ...? - I’m talking about your heroic prosecutors who, risking their lives consider Arabs killed by Israel. wink .

                    Of course they do. We won’t count, Amnesty will count for us, and arithmetic is not their strong point.
                    I repeat, assessing the damage done to the enemy is a paramount task. As prosecutors believe, a separate conversation.
                2. +1
                  April 27 2017 03: 45
                  Have you already moved away from embarrassment over the joy of the "destroyed" Shell "at the Syrian air base"? Do not worry when the militants retreat; caring for a peacekeeper is entirely their prerogative. Do not cover yourself and keep away
        2. 0
          April 26 2017 19: 03
          Quote: professor
          Sergei Rudskoy: Losses of militants amounted to more than 6800 people killed and wounded. Also destroyed 68 units of armored vehicles, 22 "jihad mobile"
          Rudskoy said that since the beginning of the military operation in Syria, the Russian Aerospace Forces carried out more than 23 thousands of sorties and caused about 77 thousands of air strikes against militant positions.


          Only one thing is not clear: these 6,8 thousand destroyed were killed only in the Hama region, or this number was destroyed from the day when the VKS first began to bomb in Syria.
      2. 0
        April 26 2017 18: 55
        There is not any kind of contracting on the issue, to build a more or less harmonious series for inferences from omissions and lies from all, all parties - a thankless job. Whoever and what numbers are announced, you yourself understand that they will be submitted in favor of the geopolitics of the parties who submit them.
    2. +1
      April 26 2017 17: 56
      Professor Oleg, a hedgehog it’s clear that many hundreds of thousands of civilians died, but the war is on, and it’s just pointless to count the dead, because every day there are more of them.
      1. 0
        April 26 2017 18: 21
        Filming with UAVs of the Syrian army in northern Hama.
  6. +3
    April 26 2017 20: 39
    Quote: mitrich
    I wonder how much this figure should be divided? And in general, does this have any reality? In a war everyone lies. And godlessly.

    After the end of World War II, historians calculated the real losses of the planes of the Germans and the British in "The Battle of England." It turned out that the Germans overestimated the number of their victories 2 times, and the British 3 times.
    Moreover, the distribution of lies among the British was very uneven. There were units (mainly on Spitfire) that overestimated victories very slightly and at the same time had many real victories, but there were very few real victories (mainly on Hurricanes) and lied without a twinge of conscience. Apparently precisely for these reasons, it is believed that during the war the number of victories of Spitfires and Hurricanes does not differ significantly, and in favor of Hurricane (!!!).
  7. 0
    April 26 2017 20: 52
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Filming with UAVs of the Syrian army in northern Hama.

    Something cameraman, inexperienced or "hot Syrian guy." Tossing the lens back and forth, it's hard to watch.
  8. 0
    April 27 2017 02: 49
    According to Sergei Rudsky, hotline phones between military departments are still working to prevent incidents in the sky of the SAR.
    Rudskoy:


    ... God forbid, if the Merkatos’s provocation still happens, these phones will not work ...
  9. +6
    April 27 2017 09: 21
    I will allow myself a lengthy quotation: “There is a widespread assessment methodology related to the achievement of the objectives and resources spent on it, and most importantly, own losses. Since the Russians have never declared their goals at all or in any particular case, it is rather difficult to evaluate the fact of performing or not performing tasks.

    If we translate this issue from the military to the political plane, then it is possible for the general task to accept the resumption of Assad’s control over the entire territory of Syria. If so, then the Russian group and its allies almost did not come close to its implementation. Yes, the only visible result of their valor is the destruction of Aleppo’s millionth 2,5.

    As for the resources already spent on the operation, even here there is no more or less accurate data ... How much and what has already been delivered there and how much of this is lost is a big question. Therefore, to evaluate the "achievements" in terms of resources spent is quite problematic. Even the total number of Russian troops is difficult to count, because some of them consist of mercenaries - part-time soldiers, who were transferred under the roofs of PMCs or recorded in the Syrian army. Nevertheless, these people did not cease to be Russians and even the military, even though they formally follow other lists. Hence the complete lack of a picture of the losses. In order not to shock the public, the regular Russian military personnel do not often get into the meat grinder, and everything is done by people from other lists. Therefore, the real losses do not correspond at all to the losses of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, which are also tightly closed. How many corpses of Russians with or without chevrons, ..., really nobody knows. But the Russian military itself claims that the losses are very substantial ...

    For this reason, it is rather funny to listen to the arguments of the “experts” about the effectiveness of the Russian army, without having at all any real parameters of the most important factors.

    Certainly, the text is controversial, but there is something in it ...

    1. 0
      April 27 2017 14: 40
      We can not disagree with you. Two options left. 1. Continue the war and beggar, 2. Get out immediately, biting his lip to the blood.
      1. 0
        April 27 2017 18: 29
        Quote: Chaos
        Two options left. 1. Continue the war and beggar, 2. Get out immediately, biting his lip to the blood.


        Actually, it wasn’t worth going in there to now have two worst-case options in front of you.
        Because, to continue the war and beggar, or immediately leave biting his lip to the blood - this, in principle, is one and the same with all the ensuing consequences for those in power.
        1. 0
          April 30 2017 01: 14
          And with what are we impoverished? For now, ratings have been raised for us and growth in 2017 has been noted. It turns out that this war is not harmful, at least it does not interfere.
  10. 0
    April 29 2017 23: 29
    Well, what can I say, Russia again lost touch with spitting and is ready "and to organize closer interaction (with the USA)."
  11. The comment was deleted.