Submachine gun ERMA EMP 36 - half a step before the MP 38 / 40

44
The first submachine guns appeared in the years of the First World War. According to their creators, this new kind of rapid-fire rifle weaponsin which an ordinary pistol cartridge was used, was to significantly increase the fire power of the advancing troops. Under the terms of the Versailles Peace Treaty of Germany, it was allowed to arm police units with machine pistols. Therefore, in the 20-e and 30-e years of the last century, the country was actively working on the creation of new types of such small arms.

One of those designers who was engaged in the development of new submachine guns was the talented gunsmith Heinrich Folmer. In the period from 1925 to 1930, he managed to create several fairly successful samples of such weapons. In 1930, the German company ERMA (Erfurter Maschinenfabrik) bought out all the rights to the weapons created by Volmer. And soon the Nazis came to power in Germany, after which new submachine guns began to be developed for the needs of the army. So in the middle of 1930's, ERMA converted the EMP submachine gun into an EMP 36 model, which became an intermediate option between the EMP and MP 38 models.



Submachine gun ERMA EMP

Immediately after the acquisition of rights to weapons, the company began mass production of Volmer’s submachine guns. The engineers of the company “restored” the cooling covers on them, but otherwise the design of the pistol-machine guns remained almost unchanged. After the purchase of weapons received a new designation EMP (Erma Maschinenpistole). Beginning with the 1932 year, these models were offered for sale domestically as well as to third countries. In this case, the company tried to adapt the weapon to the requirements of specific customers, for this reason, the submachine gun was produced in several basic versions. They differed from each other mainly by the barrel length, caliber, the type of sight used, and the presence or absence of a fuse.

Experts highlight today three basic versions of EMP submachine guns. The first is with an 30 cm barrel, a bayonet attachment unit and a tangential type sight. These submachine guns were delivered by Germany to the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, in particular to Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. The second model was the most massive and was considered standard. The barrel length was 25 cm, the bayonet mount was absent, on some models a simplified L-shaped sight was mounted, on others a tangential type sight. Most often, these submachine guns were equipped with a fuse. The third variant of the EMP was distinguished by the presence of a butt-like MP-18.1 submachine gun.

Submachine gun ERMA EMP 36

It is worth noting that the guns of the company "Erma" had a commercial success in the market. Of course, it was difficult to call it significant, but it was not worth it to underestimate. A total of at least 10 thousand EMP submachine guns were produced in Germany, but the exact volume of their release has not been established yet. A batch of these submachine guns in 1936 was purchased by the SS, who used these weapons throughout World War II.

In early 1936, the German Arms Directorate submitted a report to the Wehrmacht High Command on the status and development prospects of submachine guns. The report contained conclusions about the need for arming with such weapons the technical branches of the armed forces and partially infantry. Based on these recommendations, the task was to create individual automatic weapons for crews tanks and armored personnel carriers, which would use submachine guns for self-defense in case of emergency evacuation from equipment. The weapons had to be developed with amendments to the fact that it would be used in the cramped conditions of the fighting compartment of tanks and armored vehicles.

Submachine gun ERMA EMP 36

In the same year, Dr. Berthold Heipel, the director of the arms company ERMA, initiated the design of the required weapons based on the samples already produced by the company. For the original model, he took a fairly well-mastered submachine gun EMP. When working, the designers proceeded from the future specificity of the use of such weapons by the crews of armored vehicles: most often the shooting would be of a forced nature. This predetermined a number of structural elements of the new submachine gun. In particular, the idea of ​​a folding butt was first implemented in it, the barrel cover was removed, and for ease of firing from the tank, the reloading handle moved to the left side of the bolt box, and a special device appeared on the barrel - a support hook that was needed to securely attach the gun gun in the embrasure of an armored vehicle. It is worth noting a truly revolutionary technology for the production of basic parts of a new weapon: instead of the traditional machine-tool processing, a qualitatively new method of cold stamping parts from a thin steel sheet was used. Prior to this, this method was used mainly only in the automotive industry. The use of stamping has significantly reduced labor costs and, as a consequence, the cost of a submachine gun. German designers of ERMA managed to create a unique design that had a direct impact on the entire future evolution of this type of small arms.

The new 9-mm submachine gun received the official designation EMP 36 and was designed to fight the enemy's manpower at a distance of up to 200 meters. The submachine gun EMP 36 consisted of a barrel with a bolt box; gate with a hammer, connected together with the details of the return mechanism (moving system); forend with folding butt, trigger box, trigger and box magazine. The use of the folding metal stock of the original design made it possible to reduce the length of the weapon from 831 mm (folded butt) to 620 mm (folded butt). Also on this model appeared pistol grip fire.

Submachine gun ERMA EMP 36

In the submachine gun EMP 36 was implemented a new design solution for the store neck, which was moved down, however, not strictly vertically to the barrel of the weapon, but with a slight shift to the left side. Such an approach finally allowed to overcome the old lack of German-developed submachine guns, which was associated with the lateral arrangement of stores. The transfer of the center of gravity to the plane of symmetry of the submachine gun immediately had a very positive effect on the accuracy of the firing of the weapon, regardless of the emptying of the magazine, especially if the shooter fired continuous fire. A box shop on the 32 cartridge was created specifically for this model, which differed from the previously produced stores in a number of parts.

Automatic machine gun EMP 36 worked on the principle of recoil free shutter. On this model, a shock mechanism of a shock type was used; it worked from a reciprocating combat spring. The trigger mechanism was almost unchanged from the EMP model. The weapon had a translator of the type of fire. His button was placed above the pistol grip. The only fuse of the submachine gun was the cranked notch on the bolt box, where the reloading handle of the weapon was wound up when retracted to the rearmost position. Return-combat spring, as in the model of an EMP submachine gun, was enclosed in guide telescopic tubes. The buffer spring contained a buffer spring, which, together with a relatively large (738 grams) mass of moving parts (impactor, bolt and return mechanism), free shutter release at the moment of firing and a long automatic stroke, allowed the rate of firing to be reduced to 350-400 per minute.

Submachine gun ERMA EMP 36

For the EMP 36 model, the weapon maintenance process has been greatly simplified. Now, to disassemble the submachine gun instead of pushing the lever protruding from the trigger guard and separating the bolt box from the butt, which was not very convenient in the EMP model, it was only necessary to pull the retaining bolt back, turning it to 1 / 4 turn, and when the trigger was pressed to separate the barrel with the bolt box and the moving parts of the automatic submachine gun from the box with the trigger mechanism and a folding metal butt.

Already after the start of mass production, it turned out that the pressed parts were still not reliable enough. Then, when the head of ERMA, Berthold Geipel, received an official order from the Wehrmacht Arms Administration to develop a new submachine gun for paratroopers, tank crews and policemen, he had to return to the technology of machining the main parts of the weapon again. Between 1936 and 1938, the EMP 36 submachine gun was developed in the MP 38. This model submachine gun was officially adopted by the 29 June 1938, becoming a truly mass model of small arms and one of the symbols of the Second World War.

Submachine gun ERMA EMP 36 - half a step before the MP 38 / 40
Submachine gun MP 38

For its time, the MP 38 submachine gun had a revolutionary design. Wooden parts were not used in its construction. The lack of a wooden butt not only made it more convenient for paratroopers and tankers, but also easier. The tree was not used at all at the release of the MP 38 submachine guns, only metal and plastic, which was first used in the design of submachine pistols.

Performance characteristics of EMP-36:
Caliber - 9 mm.
Cartridge - 9x19 mm Parabellum.
Overall length - 831 mm.
Length with folded butt - 620 mm.
Barrel length - 250 mm.
Weight without cartridges - 3,96 kg.
Shop - box on the cartridge 32.
The initial speed of the bullet - 360 m / s.
The rate of fire - up to 350-400 vyst / min.
Sighting range of shooting - 200 m.

Information sources:
http://zonwar.ru/pp/mp_36.html
http://militaryarms.ru/oruzhie/pulemety/mp-38-i-mp-40
http://war-arms.info/strelkovoe-oruzhie/pistoleti-pulemeti-i-avtomati/germaniya/erma/pistolet-pulemet-erma-mp-36.html
Open source materials
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    April 21 2017 15: 09
    Thanks to the author for the article! good
  2. +3
    April 21 2017 15: 45
    I join the above words. Thank.
  3. +3
    April 21 2017 16: 28
    MP-38, 40 - a classic, a good unit.
    The only major problem is the fuse, or rather, its absence!
    1. +2
      April 21 2017 16: 49
      The usual cut-out (two in models with 42nd seem) in the lid, what else can you do?
      1. +3
        April 21 2017 18: 05
        Not really. In some models, the shutter handle was also a fuse (about the same as our PPD and PPSh), which closed the shutter in the forward position.
        1. +1
          April 21 2017 19: 35
          I don’t quite understand this - as when firing from an open shutter, and the striker on the mirror, you can make a fuse except on the cutout with a handle (the MP40 is okay, there is a separate striker, it’s not clear why).
          1. +3
            April 21 2017 19: 43
            Ways a little less than to hell. Starting from the institution of the shutter handle to the cutout of the receiver (first used on the MP-18) and somehow implemented the engine on the cocking handle (MP-40, though only in the front position, PPD, PPSh), Thompson whispered lock, lock the shutter with the M cover -3 ... Well, etc.
            At the same time, the method of firing the shot does not matter.
            1. 0
              April 21 2017 19: 51
              Ie cut, thanks, I understood everything.
              1. +5
                April 21 2017 20: 01
                Regarding MP-40 and PPD, PPSh just like that. There was a movable part with a fixation that went into the cutouts of the box. PPD and PPSh had two such cutouts. Corresponding to the extremely forward and cocked shutter position. The Germans initially on the MP-38 there was only a cutout in which the handle was turned on when the cocked shutter. However, during operation, it soon became clear that with an adjoined store and a sharp jerk, for example, when jumping from a car, the shutter could quite well retreat back enough distance to pick up the cartridge with the corresponding consequences. Therefore, they began to make such a fuse on it.
                1. +1
                  April 21 2017 20: 09
                  Ok, I agree, even put an asterisk.
                2. 0
                  April 21 2017 21: 42
                  Although no, I still didn’t understand, what for, I need a second cut-out - when the shutter is in the extreme front position, you still can’t open the fire, you need to cock the shutter — there is no cartridge in the chamber, why do you need a cut-out in the extreme front position — just to understand what position the shutter is in ?
                  1. +1
                    April 21 2017 22: 06
                    I wrote ...
                    With a strong push, when hitting the back of the box on the ground, for example, when dismounting from a truck, a person slipped and purely instinctively hit the machine, the inertia of the massive shutter was enough to step back and push the cartridge out of the magazine. Accordingly, a shot followed. That's to prevent this from happening and made a fuse that locks the shutter in its extreme forward position.
                    The cutout in the box is made so that the fuse engine goes in there.
                    1. 0
                      April 22 2017 08: 28
                      If you have a bolt in the forward position, then there is no cartridge in the chamber, what to block?. So you want to say, a hundred blowing forces to the ground is enough for the bolt, the PCA, for example, moved from the front position to the length of the cartridge and sent it to the barrel?
                      1. +2
                        April 22 2017 08: 49
                        In fact, in a weapon firing from the rear whisper of the cartridge in the chamber until the shutter is released. Just by definition.
                        So you want to say, a hundred impact forces on the ground is enough to shutter, PPSh suppose, moved from the front position to the length of the cartridge and sent it to the barrel?

                        That's right. The same PPSh bolt had a mass of 700 grams and not to say that it would have a very powerful reciprocating spring. In addition, the pistol cartridge is quite short, so there have been such cases. Moreover, with some dexterity, you and the shutter of the AK can distort in this way. (True, one hundred percent get on the neck from the nearest commander :))
                        By the way, here in this photo, cutouts for the fuse engine and the engine itself, mounted on the cocking handle, are very clearly visible.
            2. +1
              April 22 2017 08: 34
              Ways a little less than to hell.

              Very sensible fuse is made on the PPP.
              It locks the shutter handle from the inside in two positions and locks the trigger for the trigger. In addition, with external influence, it locks and in fact it can only be opened "from the inside" of the trigger protection.
              1. +3
                April 22 2017 08: 53
                Well PPP itself is a very sensible PP. It is a pity that Sudaev died so early.
                1. +1
                  April 22 2017 09: 36
                  Yes, the modified AC-44 had every chance of becoming a Kalashnikov.
                  1. 0
                    April 22 2017 14: 45
                    It may well be ...
                    It is a pity that so many ceased to live too early ...
  4. +2
    April 21 2017 16: 46
    Quote: Nikkola Mac
    MP-38, 40 - a classic, a good unit.

    still glows in troubled places on our planet
  5. +2
    April 21 2017 17: 51
    dream of black diggers sad
  6. +4
    April 21 2017 17: 59
    According to the plan of their creators, this new type of rapid-fire small arms, in which an ordinary pistol cartridge was used, was supposed to significantly increase the firepower of the advancing troops.

    Typical transferable stamp.
    The "idea of ​​the creators" was not to increase the "firepower of the advancing", but to equip the defenders with automatic weapons due to a lack of light machine guns. Hence the lateral location of the store - for the convenience of firing from a trench.
    1. 0
      April 22 2017 09: 03
      The "idea of ​​the creators" was not to increase the "firepower of the advancing",

      However, the Germans MP-18/1 were armed precisely with assault squads - after they tried the Mausers and Parabellums with "big" shops and long butts.
      ERMA 36 (future MP-38) was generally initially created at the request of the headquarters of tank and motorized troops as a weapon of self-defense of tankers and crews of armored vehicles. And only then the paratroopers became interested in them and even later - the infantrymen. Moreover, only platoon and company commanders initially armed themselves - who are more in charge of the battle than they are participating in it.
      Most of this statement corresponded to the Red Army - there it was supposed to have 2 shooters with the RPD (PPSh) before the war - who, together with the DP machine gun, were supposed to solve the "last 200 meters" problem.
      1. 0
        April 22 2017 18: 57
        Quote: Nikkola Mac
        However, the Germans MP-18 / 1 armed precisely the assault troops

        However, the last use of assault battalions was in the 21 March 1918 offensive in Operation Unternehmen Michael, and the first MP-18s began to be delivered to the troops much later. If one of the German officers had a good idea about arming assault units with submachine guns, then it remained with her not even the first, but the Second World War. The PPs were developed exclusively as a defensive machine-gun weapon with a two-man service staff, where the second number was carrying more than 2000 cartridges.
        Mention of the armament of the German assault groups by the first BCPs is complete, but not a single link, not a single photograph and not a single document about their real use by the Germans in the WWII offensive operations.
        http://oper-1974.livejournal.com/637431.html
        The first real use of air defense in assault units began precisely in the Soviet Army. But can this fact be compared with the genius of German military thought (sarcasm).
        1. 0
          April 23 2017 08: 41
          Sorry, but still your statement that the PP was planned as a defensive weapon between the wars is a bit of a draw. Rather, the thesis about finding a place and meaning in battle - both offensive and defensive - will be true.
          The fact that the Germans planned MP18 / 1 for assault units is reliable (just look at his snail store for Parabellum and numerous messages - “for assault units and the police”). As well as the fact that by the time they arrived there, the Germans had actually lost their strategic initiative.
          But what further - gangster showdowns in the United States are unlikely to be an indicator - although they were used ("Thompsons") both in attack and in defense.

          Further, PPs were widely used in the "war in Chaco" (between Bolivia and Paraguay - 1932-35). The German major Brandt who fought in this war made good notes about this war and about the action of the PP in particular. In the pristine forests and shrubs of South America, sudden short fire contacts were a common form of battle, where the PP showed good results. Upon returning to Germany, Brant advocated for 30% the armament of infantry, cavalry, engineering and motorcycle parts of the PP.
          The Germans themselves began to argue with him, mainly by clicking on the short range of the actual fire and the completely different character of the European theater of operations.
          It is easy to see that the “war in Chaco” is a specific conflict, and in a sudden battle in a forest and shrubbery at a short distance, the PP could be used equally by both the attacker and the defending side.
          And as a result, ERMA 36 was originally ordered as something more than a pistol for armored vehicle crews, and then the MP-38 was armed with paratroopers (by no means without exception) and rifle company officers (even later non-commissioned officers).

          The next conflict was the Soviet-Finnish war. It’s also quite specific. About how the “Suomi” “mowed” the Red Army did not write only lazy. However, the reality speaks about something else.
          There were 2954 people in the Finnish infantry regiment and he was armed:
          - 2325 rifles, 36 easel machine guns, 72 light machine guns and 72 machine guns.
          Considering that the Finns were defending, this scanty amount of bullets (3%) was used (although in reality almost all the power of the fire was “Maxims” firing tens of thousands of bullets over an area).
          And everyone unanimously forgets about the states of another unit - the so-called sissi battalions. Ski "partisan" battalions for special purposes. They were intended for independent actions with outbreaks and detours through the forests of the advancing divisions of the Red Army. Instead of two submachine guns in the infantry platoon of the regular army, sissi battalion platoons received four Suomi submachine guns. Because they no longer had any automatic weapons. They were used for predominantly offensive operations and also used their PP.
          These divisions are mainly told at the mention and “general armament” of the Finns of the PP.
          The Germans were also actively using PP in obviously offensive (assault) clashes during the landing on Crete and the Americans in the airborne phase of the Overlord. But one cannot speak of "mass armament" either.
          1. 0
            April 23 2017 14: 23
            The Germans themselves began to argue with him, mainly by clicking on the short range of the actual fire and the completely different character of the European theater of operations.

            And in principle, they were right. Who could have suggested that one of the main types of battles of World War II would be a battle in urban conditions?
          2. +1
            April 23 2017 19: 42
            Not to weaken the attraction of the ears, but solely to shake off the noodles from them,
            so be it.
            Do not try to replace the thesis “creator’s intention” with the thesis about finding a place and meaning in battle - both offensive and defensive, which in the source sounded like “it was the assault troops armed”. ("The ABC of the demagogue", Detgiz, 1962, Chapter "The art of substitution of the thesis").
            If you trace the history of the subject, the first embodiment of the creator’s intention in 1915 was a double-barreled machine gun firing pistol cartridges.
            Then he moved to the trenches of the Italian army in the form of the same double-barreled light machine gun. After a while he was half and
            became a full-fledged submachine gun. Note, indeed the first in the world to equip infantry units, since the Italian assault thought
            significantly lagged behind the German and thought more not about the assault, but about how not to get lyuley from the most advanced militarily of German thought.
            Thus, the very first PP sample completely rejects the thesis that:

            As conceived by their creators, this new type of ... weapon was to significantly increase the firepower of the advancing troops.


            As for the second sample, German. The fact that it was a weapon designed to fire from the trenches, as a cheap alternative
            machine guns, says not only their design, but also

            - The tactics of military operations prevailing in the WWII. The breakthrough of the defense was carried out after artillery and machine-gun training, by pulling manpower to the line of attack (400 m.?) With a multiple advantage. You can repel such an attack
            It was only using automatic weapons, which was represented at that time only with machine guns.
            During the artillery preparation period, the defending side retreated its easel machine guns away from the front line in order to preserve. Therefore, they simply did not have time to pull them to the line of defense in time. All this was written not only in military literature, but also in Brusilov and Fedorov.

            - the historical context, the emergence of the PP at the end of the war, when the Germans were no longer ready for assaults.

            As for the "assault squads" and their weapons, this is a separate topic and has nothing to do with the main thesis of the article on the "intentions of the creator". No
            There are no historical or technical facts that the air defense forces were created exclusively for assault groups. About what they intended to arm - maybe. I do not exclude it.
            But for one moment I want to pay attention. So, according to the author of the article, the idea of ​​the creators of the 1918 of the year was to arm the PP of certain groups of soldiers conducting offensive operations. Why in the 1942 year in Stalingrad



            no such groups were observed. Did the creators of the concept rethink something?

            PS. "Shop - snail" is from parabellum, it was already before the appearance of MP-18 and was created by another office.

            I apologize for the ironic tone.
            1. 0
              April 24 2017 04: 51
              Do not try to replace the thesis "creator design"

              Let's not confuse the genesis of PP Rivelli M1915 and MP18 / 1 - the first was really created for defense (and aviation) - almost like a light machine gun, but the second - as a weapon of assault units after experimenting with Luger (Parabelum) and Mauser .
              - The tactics of military operations prevailing in the WWII. The breakthrough of the defense was carried out after artillery and machine-gun training, by pulling manpower to the line of attack (400 m.?) With a multiple advantage. You can repel such an attack

              You forget the main reason for the "positional dead end" - the insufficient speed of breaking into the defense and further advancement through the second line to enter the operational space. Otherwise, the enemy quickly pulled up forces and “sealed” the breakthrough.
              The Entente tried to solve this problem with a tank attack, the Germans with assault groups (battalions, companies, etc.).
              - the historical context, the emergence of the PP at the end of the war, when the Germans were no longer ready for assaults.

              This is not entirely true, although the Germans had already lost their strategic initiative, the last attempt at a major offensive was the “Second Battle of the Marne” - from July 15 to August 6, where the assault units were actively used, the air defense forces began to arrive at the front in March (in many sources it’s just "spring" 1918).
              Did the creators of the concept rethink something?

              I have repeatedly mentioned above how the Germans looked at the place of the PP in the Wehrmacht.
              "Shop - snail" is from parabellum,

              Exactly - the Germans were just trying to use this model ("art model" + snail store) in the assault units.
  7. +3
    April 21 2017 18: 34
    If a person who is far from history looks at x / f, and there the whole Wehrmacht is armed with MP38. How much in childhood I watched and now in films all the way to MP38, but in fact there were a lot less.
    I remember in my childhood I watched a war film, and my cousin spit: what a nonsense, that in 1941 everyone had PPSh machine guns, in nature PPSh were in short supply in the summer of 1942
  8. 0
    April 21 2017 19: 23
    echo of war! Good article.
  9. +5
    April 21 2017 19: 37
    Skeleton-shaped, brutal Teutonic machine gun (submachine gun) Schmeisser (I know, I know, not Schmeisser at all :) ... but for the 70's boy this unit was a symbol of Fritz and, at the same time, an attribute of the coolest " our "... remember the Soviet films ...

    The most dashing partisans are all polls with “Schmeissers” ... Zorka from “The battalions are asking for fire” - with “Schmeisser” ... “There is no way back” - from Toporkov, Lyovushkin - again they ...
    Most of our scouts from the Soviet cinema are with them!
  10. 0
    April 22 2017 01: 16
    Beautiful, infection! Would buy such, and not MMG, but military.
    1. +3
      April 22 2017 09: 56
      The Germans began to release as a "hunting carbine", somewhere I saw ....
  11. 0
    April 22 2017 09: 05
    Grid,
    I told you that there is no cartridge in the chamber - what to block.
    In order to cock AK in this way, it’s necessary to purposefully and purposefully hammer on a concrete floor, in m16a2, the butt simply burst with such a blow. I never shot from the PPSh at all, but the spring of the MP40 and PPS is quite stiff (and the fuse in the PPS is not so primitive) - something is doubtful, although okay, you answered the question, you just carried the blizzard first wink
    1. +3
      April 22 2017 09: 09
      I told you that there is no cartridge in the chamber - what to block.

      Gate. So that by inertia he would not move backward, a distance sufficient to capture the cartridge from the magazine, but not enough to be positioned in a sear.
      To cock the AK in this way you need to nefigovo and purposefully hammer on the concrete floor

      Naturally. And I watched such frames. One even managed to split the butt of AKM.
      you answered the question, just first carried the blizzard

      Where exactly?
      1. 0
        2 February 2018 19: 43
        Quote: Grille
        One even managed to split the butt of AKM.

        Could break? Does AKM have a butt like plywood?
  12. 0
    April 22 2017 12: 11
    Submachine gun ERMA EMP
    You can see how he influenced our PDP.
    1. +4
      April 22 2017 14: 42
      In which place?
      Moreover, the first PPD appeared two years earlier ...
      1. 0
        April 22 2017 17: 53
        Quote: Grille
        Moreover, the first PPD appeared two years earlier ...

        That's just like PPD 40
        1. +1
          April 22 2017 18: 23
          90 percent of pre-war PPs are similar, by the way, bolts are also similar.
        2. +1
          April 22 2017 22: 50
          I ask again. Specifically, what is it like? What again we stole from the Germans?
  13. jjj
    0
    April 22 2017 16: 04
    Thanks to the author. A gap has been filled in the development of automatic small arms between MP-18 and MP-38
  14. Rjn
    0
    April 22 2017 17: 56
    I read that in hand-to-hand there were cases when ours received a bullet in the forehead when the enemy hit the PPSh butt. I think there was such a possibility.
  15. 0
    April 22 2017 18: 54
    Quote: RJN
    I read that in hand-to-hand there were cases when ours received a bullet in the forehead when the enemy hit the PPSh butt. I think there was such a possibility.

    Therefore, our foot soldiers and beat me in a melee obliquely, and not from top to bottom)))) ...
  16. 0
    18 October 2021 16: 53
    What does it mean "rolling the free bolt at the time of the shot" in the context of reducing the rate of fire?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"