What is with the machine tool program in Russia?
The curator of the implementation of these plans was the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation.
By the beginning of the implementation of PP in Russia, there were about a hundred machine-tool companies, the volume of products which barely covered a tenth (these are official indicators, and therefore could well have been embellished) the needs of the Russian economy in machine tools and other tools for creating industrial products with high added value. . For obvious reasons, such indicators clearly did not satisfy the requests that existed in relation to the Russian industrial production. It was necessary to undertake something in order to give the machine-tool industry in the country at least some kind of development impulse after two decades of constant decline.
The implementation of the subprogramme meant not only an increase in the number of domestic manufactured machines, but also the development of the entire machine-building complex, including R & D to develop the latest models in the machine-tool industry and the creation of new jobs at the industrial facilities of the machine-tool industry. The total funding for the implementation of this segment of the subprogrammes was assumed to be at the level of 50 billion rubles (by the time of the start of the implementation of the PP, about 1,7 billion US dollars). Of these, about 52% are funds from the federal budget.
The commencement of the implementation of the subprogramme at the “civilian” level actually coincided with the beginning of the implementation of plans to re-equip the Russian army. Initially, the development of the machine tool industry in the framework of the modernization program of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to 2020, provided for about 3 trillion rubles. The amount is more than serious, and it instilled significant optimism about the fact that the machine-tool industry in Russia will still go up, and very confidently.
What were the results of the PP “Development of the domestic machine-tool industry and tool industry”, which actually acted as part of a project for military-technical modernization? Let us try to figure it out.
And this is not easy at all, if only for the reason that the 2016 year ended more than 3,5 a month ago, and the data on the implementation of this part of the Federal Target Program for the year 2016 mentioned has not yet been consolidated and not officially presented. In this regard, it would seem, why run ahead - well, wait quite a bit, a week or two - you look, the responsible “comrades” will present a report on the implementation of the software on 2016 in particular, and for the 2011-2016 period as a whole. Here then it would be possible to analyze what is there with the machine tool program. But here's the catch - one could wait, if not for one remarkable nuance. On the site that publishes reports on the implementation of various kinds FTP, there is no summary data not only for the past, but even for the year before (2015) year! The question arises: but how is that? - How long to wait for reporting on the implementation of the “machine-tool” sub-program of the federal program?
The answer to this question in a somewhat veiled form is presented by the people who published reports on FTPs. It turns out that the sub-program under consideration, announced under the loud title “Development of the domestic machine-tool industry and tool industry,” actually ordered to live long in the 2014 year (at least, no reports since then). It was this year that the fervor of federal funding for PP came to naught, and the subprogramme itself, as a separate phenomenon of strategic importance, ordered to live long. Here is the schedule and table of budget financing and the so-called cash execution, which are currently hanging on the site. As you can see, the last 32 million rubles (which the program should not be the last) were allocated three years ago.
And this is the data on what specific plans for machine tool construction in the Russian Federation were being hatched by persons who created the paper version of the software, and what results the industry has come from.
Waiting for compilers of PP in terms of products manufactured at established production sites - 4,5 thousand by 2016 year. But reporting on the results for 2011-2016 years - zero point zero. That is, either the Ministry of Industry and Trade has no data on this, or there is data, but about them is either good or nothing ... Nothing so far ...
Waiting for the compilers of the PP on the power input at the established production sites for the production of developed technological tools of engineering production - 672 per year. This is a plan, but the fact and in this case there is no data for any of the subprogramme’s years of implementation.
For the period from 2011 to 2016, it was planned to create 17 new systems of high-tech components, providing the production of dual-use equipment. Performed from them - 9 (2012 and 2013 years).
Plans for the creation of computer-aided design, computing, modeling, technological preparation of production, life cycle support - 45. Performed by 26.
Plans for the creation of dual-use equipment systems for the manufacture of parts without machining - 22. Performed by 19.
Plans for the creation of instrumental systems - 14. Created by - 11.
There is, in fairness, and fulfilled, and even partially over-fulfilled plans. For example, the plans for the implementation of a project on the creation of forging and pressing machines with CNC related to dual-use process equipment (plan - 8, fact - 12) have been exceeded.
Reporting has been published for some time by the Department of State Targeted Programs and Capital Investments of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia.
The study of the implementation of the subroutine leads to another interesting fact. The Federal Register of Government Contracts says that contractual plans were available for all years of the program’s term, but there was no real contracting for more than two years.
In the 2014 year, in which the last “trace” of reports on the Federal Targeted Program is taking place, the Minister of Industry and Trade announced that state investment in the industry will continue and be at the level of 5 billion rubles over the 2014-2016 period, while the level of private investment will increase to 10 billion rubles .
Denis Manturov:
This is all great, but why wait for 2020, in order to announce the results that for some reason are missing in the reporting table for the implementation of the already completed subprogram? It is possible, because in the rating table of the main machine-tool states of the world, our country (with state programs and relevant ministries in charge of their implementation) is still in the top ten. And when she claimed the first place in the world ...
Against this background, there are individual enterprises that report on steadily growing profits from the production of machine-tool equipment.
In particular, the largest Russian machine tool manufacturer STAN, which has seven industrial sites from Moscow and Kolomna to Azov and Sterlitamak, reports on the growth in revenue. Among the customers of the machines are such companies as RZD, Roskosmos, Rosatom, companies holding Rostec, etc. The steady growth in profits suggests that the demand for high-quality machines in the country is really great, and this demand today is clearly not satisfied with domestic offers. And so that the proposals on their quality and quantity were satisfactory, is it worth waiting for 2020 of the year, then again to be perplexed about the “lost” reporting? Or is it worth it to deal with the real effectiveness of the FTP now?
- Alexei Volodin
- http://fcp.economy.gov.ru/cgi-bin/cis/fcp.cgi/Fcp/ViewFcp/View/2012/352/, https://www.stan-company.ru
Information