Options Navalny. Or bunks, or paid provocateur

103
Options Navalny. Or bunks, or paid provocateur


Well that's all. The career of a recently unsinkable and eternally conditional provocateur and a merchant from the policy of Navalny seems to be ending very soon. And his fate remains only two options for development. Or, on the basis of the superhuman (to Navalny) Russian laws, this citizen must go to places of deprivation of liberty in order to actually serve the canceled suspended sentence. Or, having received a conviction in the third criminal case, remain conditionally convicted and thus confess to having high patrons who did not allow Navalny to go to prison even with the third proven crime. So, the alternative is not great: either you leave for a couple of years to see the brother you have planted in the Mordovian camps, or you are the most that goat provocateur, who knows his impunity and pushes hundreds of people, including children, to commit crimes.



The fact is that the billionaire and public figure Alisher Usmanov stated that he is not a criminal and the crime stipulated in part 5 of the article 291 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (giving a bribe to an official on a large scale. Term: from eight to fifteen years), did not commit. And, accordingly, filed a lawsuit for the protection of honor and dignity, and also submits a statement about the crime against him Navalny, provided for by part 5 of article 128.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Libel, connected with the prosecution of a person in a particularly grave crime). And Usmanov said this because in March, Navalny and the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) released a very expensive (thanks to the sponsors we all know well) the film “He's not your Dimon,” where they told about the sneakers and T-shirts of Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and quite reasonably and convincingly at 100 percent found out that Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev ... studied at Leningrad State University and had fellow students. This is where the real connection between the “investigation” and the current prime minister ends and almost erotic fantasies of Alexei Navalny begin, fulfilling the order “for Dimona” and aware of the severe need to urgently master the budget.

So one of the fundamental fantasies of twice conditionally convicted Navalny was the thesis (of course, not proven) that the billionaire Usmanov bribed 50 million dollars to Prime Minister Medvedev, allegedly giving him a palace with grounds on Rublevka. Scream was not measured. "Echo", "New" and "Rain", with the support of "Radio Liberty" and "Deutsche Welle", went into a voluptuous tantrum - here they are, corrupt officials and bribe takers billionaire and prime minister! Bulk will not lie! But then a nuisance happened - the citizen turned out to be a lie. Moreover, one hundred percent. See for yourself.

In the Navalny film “He's not Dimon to You”, it is stated that Usmanov donated the alleged Social Development Project, a charitable foundation for supporting socially significant state projects, which, again according to the authors, is affiliated to Premier Medvedev, the house and 4,3 hectares of land in the village of Znamenskoye not far from Rublevo-Uspenskoye highway worth about 5 billion rubles.

“We perfectly understand what this gift means: it is a bribe. There can be no other explanation as to why an oligarch gives someone an estate for 5 billion, ”the FBK’s“ investigation ”said.

And none of the happily applauding did not bother (or did not want) to pay attention to the obvious repeated lies of a citizen of Navalny and his team, who could not but know the following facts. Firstly, the Sotsgosproekt Foundation is not a charity, but a structure that is engaged in, among other things, “commercial services provision activities”. And secondly, the accusation of bribery of Medvedev and Usmanov is based only on one "irrefutable evidence" - some Ilya Eliseev and Alexey Chetvertkov, who studied together with the future prime minister at the university many years ago, run the fund. And this is where their documentary connection with the current head of government ends. This is the only “proof of bribe” that FBK found. That is, according to Navalny, none of Medvedev's former fellow practitioners can do business, charity, or anything other than sweeping the streets, since any of their actions are immediately interpreted as a bribe to the Prime Minister. Funny Yes, if it’s a bottleneck in the kitchen, and not a large amount of publication, but also paid for mass distribution in the network, including bots scrolled on YouTube.

After that, Alisher Usmanov quite lucidly explained that the transfer of the estate on Rublevskoye Highway to the Sotsgosproekt Foundation was a commercial transaction related to the accession of another site to the territory of his country house. According to Usmanov, the estate was intended for his sister’s residence, but she did not live in it, finding the house too large. Alisher Usmanov, from his longtime acquaintance at Gazprominvestholding Ilya Yeliseyev, learned that the Sotsgosproekt Foundation is going to develop a development project near the borders of the site where Usmanov’s house is located. “I’ve been looking for an opportunity to expand my site where I’ve been living for more than 20 for years, so I offered to exchange their lot, 12 ha, for my sister’s lot away from me and with a ready home,” the businessman said. The fund gave Usmanov an empty plot on Rublevskoye Highway with an area of ​​12 hectares “at a nominal price,” and he transferred to the Sotsgosproekt a sister’s plot and a house. Obtained from the fund plot Usmanov estimates in 50 million US dollars. According to the businessman, the area of ​​4 hectares transferred to Sotsgosproekt is 15 — 20 million dollars, and the house is 30 million. “So the balance is approximately 50 on 50,” Usmanov said. Where is Dmitry Medvedev here in this deal is difficult to say. Or rather, impossible. Unless, of course, we are not talking about Navalny’s ordered “investigation,” out of habit, having forgotten that he must be held accountable for his words and deeds.

It is also not difficult to imagine the course of a possible trial on this episode, when all documents on this transaction will be presented in court and commented on by its participants. The FBK problem is that, having grabbed one component, Navalny “did not notice” the second part, interpreting the “Donation Agreement” so that it was “corrupt”, well, nice for consumers.

“If Navalny had asked the officials representing the interests of my companies, he would have received a clear answer and wouldn’t need to invent anything,” said Usmanov. The position of the FBK in this case is not too convincing. They believe that "they could not reveal the cards," and Usmanov's phone "they did not have." It turns out that they were able to unearth the most complicated schemes at FBK, but they didn’t find the phones of secretaries, assistants or legal services of Usmanov. Amazing.

However, a citizen of Navalny, sensing that the ground was finally disappearing from under his feet, tried to tell that the information about such an exchange between Usmanov and "Sotsgosproekt" does not correspond to reality. They say, according to the documents of Rosreestr, there was no plot of 12 ha on Rublevka from the Sotsgosproekt Foundation ... Usmanov bought a plot of 12 ha from the companies Lesnoy Dom and Group East West. “And the very estate in Znamenskoye, which we all already know very well, he donated to the Sotsgosproekt Foundation. But, as it turned out, Navalny again, without straining at all, tritely lied, continuing to commit the crime, provided, as mentioned above, by part 5 of the 128.1 article of the RF Criminal Code (slander, coupled with the accusation of a person in a particularly grave crime).


The fact is that this very site, called Lesha “a bribe to Medvedev”, was owned by the “East Invest Group”, with which “Sotsgosproekt” had an agreement on joint development of the site in Uspensky. On this site they planned to build a cottage settlement for sale. Under the terms of the agreement, East Invest Group was to provide a plot, and the Sotsgosproekt foundation would provide funding. Hence the presence in the transaction of several stages and several parties. So, that with the site and the estate, the situation is quite clear and it is not at all in favor of the citizen Navalny and his accomplices from FBK. In any legal proceedings, both civil and criminal, and in any court, both Russian and foreign.

And now, when it became known that citizen Usmanov filed a lawsuit on the protection of honor and dignity against the citizen Navalny and the FBK created by him to the Lyublinsky District Court of Moscow, everything falls into place. It is clear that Alisher Usmanov will win the lawsuit, since there is not a single piece of evidence in the “investigation” of Navalny, but there are a large number of direct accusations of committing particularly serious crimes.

The next step is likely to be a statement from Usmanov about Navalny committing a crime stipulated in the 5 part of the 128.1 article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (defamation, coupled with the prosecution of a person for a particularly serious crime), for which a penalty of “a fine of up to five million rubles or in the amount of salary or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to three years, or mandatory work for up to four hundred and eighty hours. ” But here it’s not even a matter of punishment, Navalny will once again collect another five million fine from gullible idiots, but the fact that it is the commission of a new crime by a citizen convicted (twice) of a crime, including one grave one.

And article 74 of the Criminal Code "Cancellation of probation or extension of probation" states that "if a probate convicted systematically violated public order during the probationary period, for which he was brought to administrative responsibility, the court on the proposal of the authority specified in part one of this Article, can make a decision on the abolition of probation and the execution of punishment imposed by a court sentence. ” As is known, Navalny was twice convicted and brought to administrative responsibility several times, and even served 15 days, but no one even tried to replace him “conditionally” with “realistically.” But this can (presumably) be attributed to the humanity of Russian justice, or, in extreme cases, to a certain inattention or unwillingness to soil oneself.

But, since Navalny is likely to be sentenced by the court for committing another criminal offense, in this case, slander, part 4 of the same article 74 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation already enters, which reads: “In case of a probation for a negligent offense or a deliberate offense of minor or moderate severity, the question of the abolition or preservation of probation is decided by the court. ” That is, if twice a probationally convicted Navalny, having committed a third crime during the period of a conditional term, remains free again, he can safely claim to participate in the world Guinness Book of Records. And he can only sign that his high backers, who are in charge of his provocative activities to split the opposition and raise money from idiots, are still in power. Or somewhere very close. There is no third option: either Navalny goes for two or three years to his brother’s camps, or he is a paid provocateur working on some near-power big uncles, seriously covering him and periodically merging his “tasks”.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 15 2017 03: 19
    Posted by: Oleg Lurie
    The person is meticulous, HARMFUL, but he does his part of the work qualitatively. Let’s look at the development of events with this criminal case, it is quite possible that everything will end - by reconciliation of the parties ... One thing I know, Navalny will go to circulation, there are other candidates in his place.
    1. +2
      April 15 2017 04: 34
      And if the reconciliation of the parties ------- all those who supported will be in a stupid situation.
      And go into circulation ---- sacred sacrifice?
      1. 0
        April 15 2017 04: 38
        Quote: Reptiloid
        And go into circulation ---- sacred sacrifice?

        I don’t think that they will want to make an icon out of it ... Who needs it?
        1. +2
          April 15 2017 04: 45
          Quote: svp67

          I don’t think that they will want to make an icon out of it ... Who needs it?

          What is needed is not an icon, but the iconostasis of the victims. Actually, it is being created.
          1. +9
            April 15 2017 05: 14
            Quote: Reptiloid
            What is needed is not an icon, but an iconostasis of victims

            No, Lesha is not pulling on the icon for the sacrificial iconostasis, God forgive me for not remembering in the morning. Too small. A provocateur, yes, but not a strategist. A sort of pop Gapon, in civilian clothes .. (IMHO)
            1. +1
              April 15 2017 05: 48
              All figures are small because where can I get others? What material is there will be recycled.
              1. +6
                April 15 2017 06: 22
                So maybe this is good? What small .. In principle, do not bring Navalny to the last gathering of boys, no one would have noticed. The resonance was mainly due to the fact that he pulled schoolchildren into the street .. And so, how many of these "revolutionaries" we have already seen. And where are they? There are no others, but those are farther away ....
                1. 0
                  April 15 2017 14: 05
                  [quote = Smog] So maybe this is good? That small .. / quote] That's just the small demons, remain demons ...
            2. 0
              April 15 2017 06: 42
              No, if you believe the article, Navalny is pulling on the new Azef. Gapon compared to him (with Azef) is so-so-small.
              1. +6
                April 15 2017 06: 52
                And how is Gapon different from Azef? Or a match, Achaef from Gapon. Both are security agents. Berries of one field Only one of them banged their own, and the other managed to hit the road from their own. But on the other hand, the Germans "rested" in Maobit.
                1. +2
                  April 15 2017 07: 06
                  Gapon is not the same level as Azef was. He created one of the first trade unions in the Republic of Ingushetia and brought people out onto the street ... But Azef, then yeah !!! One of the highest paid agents of the 3rd branch. And how many provocations he has for his soul !!! From leaflets to assassination of officials and members of the royal family. And it was multiplied by zero because he- "both ours and yours, let's dance" and the reevolutionaries, in particular the Socialist-Revolutionaries, was just handed over by the secret police
                  1. +2
                    April 15 2017 07: 18
                    A long time ago there was an article about gapon here. 3-4 years ago ...... I didn’t register yet. It was said that he himself did not understand the political struggle very well. But he was ambitious, education was minimal, he dreamed of being elevated, to become the head ... ....
                    1. +2
                      April 15 2017 07: 44
                      He was an ambitious fool! And played it blindly
                  2. +3
                    April 15 2017 07: 20
                    Quote: Forester
                    Gapon is not the same level as Azef was

                    One field of berries. One is smaller, the other larger.
                    1. +2
                      April 15 2017 07: 42
                      I will not go into the discussion, but the apple from the cherry does not fall far, here I agree with you
                2. 0
                  April 15 2017 14: 06
                  Quote: Smog
                  And how is Gapon different from Azef?

                  Yes, a lot of things, how Azef arranged terrorist attacks, I don’t want anyone to know in practice
                3. 0
                  April 16 2017 17: 10
                  Quote: Smog

                  3
                  Smog Yesterday, 06:52 ↑
                  And how is Gapon different from Azef?

                  Azef is a terrorist, the head of the Socialist Revolutionary Group, Gapon is a propagandist provocateur, which of them is the bigger question. Azef shot, blew up representatives of the state power of the Russian Empire, Gapon propagandized the workers and led them to Bloody Sunday, which led to the 1905 revolution, with a mass of victims on both sides. they stand each other.
            3. +1
              April 17 2017 13: 52
              A provocateur, yes, but not a strategist. A sort of pop Gapon, in civilian clothes ..
              Or a parody of Trotsky.
              No matter how useful he is to Tafft as Nemtsov.
              Lesha, don’t go with excursion girls from Bandera on the bridge. lol
        2. +4
          April 15 2017 08: 59
          It is time for our state to fork out and put Anal in a free "dispensary" for five years (for starters) ... let him sew slippers. smile
          1. +2
            April 15 2017 12: 58
            For such things, under the Constitution of the Russian Federation, there are courts.
          2. 0
            April 16 2017 13: 43
            Why at home contain the infection, send them from the country let them yap from behind the hill ... they won’t pay there.
        3. +5
          April 15 2017 11: 30
          In order to discredit the protest movement, it is necessary to appoint a very odious person as its leader. Which is done.
      2. 0
        April 15 2017 09: 43
        And go into circulation ---- sacred sacrifice?
        Rather, a traitor to the ideals of the opposition.
    2. +3
      April 15 2017 08: 45
      If we "stir up the water", then the facts must be absolutely reliable and provable. And so, all this will be a provocation and slander. Why fuss in Navalny, the answer is simple. He has powerful support in the liberal power structures that carry out the task of the collapse of the Russian state.
      1. 0
        April 19 2017 14: 12
        siberalt

        Bulk lawyer, in this oligarchy and power pulled to the last with the filing of lawsuits.
        They are afraid to sit in a puddle in public.
        Now it’s obvious that they want to play the power version of punishment.

        And according to the article, the author’s remark did not bother the development of the territories on Rublevka by the “Sotsgosproject” for cottage settlements.

        Typically, for the poor, they probably built houses for which they purchased from Usmanov at a reasonable price%)
        And his house for 30 million can only be sold at auction, and it is unlikely that anyone will pay such grandmothers for it.

        I was in the village of the rich recently, so there are a lot of empty houses for sale. We have built castles for ourselves, and now they are gathering dust.

        It’s also cool that the author of Navalny’s article accuses him in absentia of a “serious crime”, he probably imagines himself to be “Judge Dread”, who defended local oligarchs by killing citizens without trial;)

        In short, this author is not pure in conscience ...
  2. +18
    April 15 2017 03: 55
    Bulk is bad.
    Medvedev is good.
    Here is the whole article in two sentences.

    As for me, if you put both of them to the wall, as in the 37th, then deep down they will both know why. am
    1. +16
      April 15 2017 04: 12
      everything looks disgusting. they brought the country to the total theft from bottom to top ... but the king is good ...
      1. +5
        April 15 2017 04: 37
        Quote: Mystery12345
        but the king is good ...

        What to do, this is a tradition ... In the life of our generation it has already been proved that the change of kings does not change anything ...
        1. +11
          April 15 2017 05: 06
          Quote: svp67
          It has already been proven in the life of our generation that the change of kings does not change anything

          I remember in the 90s I was sitting at a bus station in a nearby town, I was waiting for a bus. It was right before the election. Grandmothers, too, waiting for the bus argued who to choose for the kingdom: Yeltsin or Zyuganov. They argued recklessly, to hoarseness. And then, having gathered arrogance, I offered them my candidacy for the president. And he announced his program: you, grandmothers say, if you elect me, you will live the same as now, but I will live well.
          After a moment's stupor, they sent me together, in the woods and even obscenities. Then we all laughed together. And now I’m thinking, probably in something I was right.
          1. 0
            April 15 2017 12: 45
            Russia cannot live well without internal and external terror. like usa. China is easier to wait out their policies. they are only engaged in internal terror. it is both scary and useful. Americans learned to mask their internal and external terror. internal at times better masked than external. under Stalin, internal terror was elevated to the rank of official politics and did not disguise itself like that. do not confuse terror of military meaning with political. if the slogans go, but do little with large-scale corruption and theft. then there is no state terror. try to bribe the police on the road to the usa. and you will know that there is state terror. try how to fool around bulk. mening, asange, and a bunch of examples. planting an idiot for a bag of potatoes has nothing to do with state terror. does not change the number of convicts without fault. without guilt there were many convicted under Stalin and Brezhnev. and in Yeltsin times it was even more than during Khrushchev. liberals will not tell you about it. they have different goals. kings, secretaries, preziki, secondary phenomenon. the state has plans internal and external, as well as various obligations internal and external. that is, it is not possible to change sharply, it is impossible. when this is not understood and revolutions, glasnost, putsch and the like occur. but they do not always do it out of ignorance. more often intentionally. hi do not rush to write me any fuss in response. think!
            1. 0
              April 19 2017 10: 42
              Thought: yepЕshhh! But YeletsИn And yet, you can respect, not respect, but the names, all the same, are capitalized: Stalin, Brezhnev.
        2. 0
          April 15 2017 12: 59
          In foreign policy changes dramatically. But about theft, yes ..
  3. +13
    April 15 2017 04: 56
    Yes, even let them eat this Bulk and all his henchmen. Spit! Where is the verification of the Investigative Committee and the Prosecutor General's Office for Medvedev?
    1. +2
      April 15 2017 05: 10
      Write a statement ... and then share the results.
      1. +8
        April 15 2017 05: 49
        "Write us a statement ... and we are already rushing to you ... with a check!" - The current slogan for scouts and prosecutors in modern times!
        1. +1
          April 15 2017 13: 16
          You expect the prosecutor’s office to start checking ... although you think the prosecutor’s office is corrupt. Then why are you waiting for a check from the prosecutor's office ... if it is bad? If the prosecutor’s office does a check ... and doesn’t find the corpus delicti ... you will say that it’s also corrupt ... And then Medvedev is guilty and that’s it. Without a single proof ... (I'm talking about real documents ... testimonies of witnesses ... and not speculation). Guilty .. because bulk said so. And how long did bulk become a god ... since you have to believe every word to him? I remembered one god who lived in our country ... maybe he still lives ... Kuzma, to call him.
    2. 0
      April 20 2017 22: 54
      Checking what? What money did you buy sneakers for?
      1. +1
        April 21 2017 10: 16
        Palaces in the Kursk region, in the Krasnodar Territory and the Moscow Region.
        Are you curious about building a fool out of me?
        1. 0
          April 21 2017 10: 52
          So they belong to the funds. A fool of himself is built by someone who believes in such statements. By the way, Navalny also has a fund, maybe on this basis the property of his fund is also Medvedev's?
          1. +1
            April 21 2017 10: 59
            Maybe so. This should be done by the UK and the GP, instead of chasing grandmothers from Jehovah's Witnesses. No?
            1. 0
              April 21 2017 13: 21
              What to do? You can intelligently write what exactly to do SK and GP? Checking YouTube videos? A check on whether Medvedev is at the dachas of friends and fellow students? Not funny at all from this? Let him write to his beloved ECHR, there he will again be told that evidence has not been submitted, and he will calm down. Rather, the new film will begin to be shot, but the sect must be fed with spiritual food constantly.
              1. +1
                April 21 2017 14: 11
                You already decide there, with friends or with foundations.
                No, it’s not funny for me that charity funds buy and build super-expensive luxury real estate. This is at least suspicious, needs to be checked and made public.
                It seems to me that after Euromaidan our grabbers should at least settle down a bit and go into the shadows, so as not to give any oval occasion and mouth to open.
                And apparently, on the contrary, they began to snatch like the last day.
                Our roads have completely melted away. Patching - EXCLUSIVELY in rainy weather. Half of the pits that were closed in March are ALREADY sticking out again. I am silent about the fact that you’ll get a little off the main highways - you get on a patchwork quilt. Either a hole or a patch. And I see it all with my own eyes every day in the morning and in the evening.
                Well, this is our new measure that has seized upon (the ever-memorable Gulevsky went for an increase, to deputy), he might get enough, in a couple of years it will be better.
                But at the federal level it’s more and more difficult to feed such Serdyukov and Vasiliev. No?
                Or is your vision black and white? Or all the good Putin caliber, or the bulk Maidan fifth column? How do you understand something?
                1. 0
                  April 21 2017 22: 34
                  One thing does not interfere: friends manage the funds. So what? What does this prove? And the fact that they are charitable, Navalny himself came up with for himself and his hamsters. Well, really, there is such a charitable foundation called “Dar” (Charity Fund for Promoting Education “Dar”), and the “Dar” that the anti-corruption fighter is talking about is the “Dar” Foundation for regional non-profit projects. Even if you consider this as some kind of indirect connection with charity (by the name, which can take at least a hundred funds at the same time), the remaining funds are not related to charity at all, they’re just non-profit organizations, simply put, they manage assets and manage them without commercial activity, and therefore registered. Navalny, on the other hand, plays on the prejudice that a fund is a charitable foundation, although the fund itself is also not charitable. Well, damn it, he’s so fussing with his fund, I would have re-registered in his place in another name, otherwise it turns out that the fund chases the fund at the fund.
                  After Euromaidan, your grabbers really should have settled down, but for some reason they became more active, they started making films.
                  I don’t know how to understand you all, and I don’t want to understand these fractions of a percent of the population, there is always such a fraction of not very smart people in any society.
                2. 0
                  April 21 2017 22: 42
                  Ilya Shumanov, the regional director of the Russian branch of Transparency International, has stated that there is no evidence of Medvedev’s ownership of the declared assets. We are waiting for the ECHR by analogy with the Seagull tongue
  4. +10
    April 15 2017 05: 47
    interestingly, the text of the article constantly emphasizes: "convicted Navalny, convicted Navalny ..."

    but about Mr. Usmanov’s previous conviction for rape, for some reason, not a word

    I wonder why winked
    1. +9
      April 15 2017 06: 14
      Quote: moskalik
      interestingly, the text of the article constantly emphasizes: "convicted Navalny, convicted Navalny ..."
      but about Mr. Usmanov’s previous conviction for rape, for some reason, not a word
      I wonder why winked

      You confuse the concepts a little: convicted and convicted. Usmanov is convicted. In 1980 he received a term, out of 8 years 6 served. Bulk is currently convicted. The suspended sentence, which has not yet ended .. Well, Usmanov’s criminal record has already been canceled. I don’t know how now, earlier for especially grave ones, the criminal record was paid off 10 years after the end of the term. So everything is correct in the article.
      1. +7
        April 15 2017 06: 35
        But in this article Usmanov is the emitter of truth. Judging by the capital,
        stole the most - which makes his words untrustworthy.
        1. +2
          April 15 2017 13: 19
          And if the Usman speaks the truth .. about what the article says. Well, if it’s really true. The fact that he did not give a bribe to Medvedev. Can it be the same? can. Will he still be bad? therefore he called the bulk slanderer ... your adored one.
      2. +4
        April 15 2017 06: 37
        Smog
        In 1980 he received a term, out of 8 years 6 served. Bulk is currently convicted. The suspended sentence, which has not yet ended .. Well, Usmanov’s criminal record has already been canceled. I don’t know how now, earlier for especially grave ones, the criminal record was paid off 10 years after the end of the term. So everything is correct in the article.

        Of course, everything is correct in the article ... A completely worthy person - this Alisher laughing
        1. 0
          April 17 2017 17: 42
          Yes, very, very worthy ... but what?
        2. 0
          April 20 2017 22: 59
          Well, what's the difference, worthy or not. If something is unworthy, is it necessary to hang a bribe on him?
    2. 0
      April 20 2017 22: 58
      Navalny’s claims to Medvedev are economic, he was convicted of an economic crime, in contrast to Usmanov, who was convicted of a non-economic crime, whose criminal record does not play any role in discussing the alleged corruption of his or his counterparties to transactions.
  5. +3
    April 15 2017 06: 36
    MDA-people hawala ... but the point is not in Navalny .... they made him a scapegoat .... the Kremlin uses it like a doll, and the people hawks ........
    1. +2
      April 15 2017 13: 19
      yes ... you get all kinds of staged videos.
      1. 0
        April 15 2017 20: 08
        I say the same .....
    2. 0
      April 20 2017 23: 03
      We have such an opposition, everyone uses it in all openings. True, here I could not understand how the Kremlin uses it. If as an example that a politician may be worse than now in power, it’s even a sin not to use it, but I haven’t heard any statements on this subject. It merges in front of the public without intermediaries, as I see it.
  6. +16
    April 15 2017 06: 36
    billionaire and public figure Alisher Usmanov
    And all that can be said about him? But what about the criminal past, 8 years in a maximum security colony for rape, extortion, and fraud? The son of the Tashkent prosecutor Alisher Usmanov, together with a friend, Nasymov, the operative of the special department of the KGB, the son of the deputy chairman of the KGB of the Uzbek SSR, were convicted in August 1980 by the Military Tribunal of the Turkestan Military District. True, as noted by Rospres.com, subsequently Alisher Usmanov cleared out criminal records. In 2000, he was officially rehabilitated by the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan, while the Uzbek archives ceased to keep all the compromising documents of Usmanov. This begs the question - what is it that two scumbags had to do such a thing that with such influential parents they could not get rid of the zone, and were forced to put them on for 8 years so as not to disturb public opinion? In the 80s in Uzbekistan they didn’t like that, but they couldn’t, even with such parents. One can see the sins there were above the roof. And now this Usmanov is teaching us morality. Well, isn't it funny?
    1. +2
      April 15 2017 07: 00
      And now this Usmanov is teaching us morality. Well, isn't it funny?
      Horseradish radish is not sweeter.

      In August 1980, he was together with Nasymov (detective officer of the special department of the KGB, the son of the deputy chairman of the KGB of Uzbekistan)
      convicted by the military tribunal of the Turkestan military district for extorting 30 thousand rubles from a soldier of the SA Mayorov. Got
      8 years of imprisonment in a penal colony with confiscation of property. The fathers of Usmanov and Nasymov were removed from their posts. Usmanov
      claimed to be a victim of political repression.

      https://flb.ru/persprint/265.html
    2. +11
      April 15 2017 07: 34
      Uzbek Usmanov is on the list of 165 richest Jews in the world according to the Israeli edition of Forbes
      The list of 165 richest Jews in the world of the Israeli version of Forbes included Ukrainian citizens Rinat Akhmetov, Victor Pinchuk and Petro Poroshenko
      Rinat Akhmetov took the 15,4th place in the ranking of Israeli Forbes with $ 12 billion, Victor Pinchuk with 3,8 billion dollars - 56th, and Petro Poroshenko with $ 1,6 billion 130th.
      Alisher Usmanov ($ 17,6 billion) recognized as the richest Russian Jew ex-presidential candidate of Russia Mikhail Prokhorov ($ 13 billion) in 18th place, Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich ($ 10,2 billion) - in 23rd.

      Now Lesha definitely can’t say hello, for he has encroached on the chosen and the unholy, and even 282 articles are sewn to the heap lol
      1. +1
        April 15 2017 08: 07
        Quote: Ascetic
        Rinat Akhmetov

        But here on the site, some argued that Akhmetov was a Tatar, not a Jew! laughing
        Greetings to Stanislav! hi
    3. 0
      April 15 2017 13: 20
      Bulk is also tried.
  7. +2
    April 15 2017 06: 39
    or Navalny goes to his brother’s camps for two or three years, or is he a paid provocateurworking for some near-power big uncles

    And how else to think differently? In another country, Navalny would have been sitting for a long time. And here is a suspended sentence, but he does what he wants. Some kind of untouchable. What, they are afraid of the reaction of the West if they plant it? In short, some nonsense.
    1. 0
      April 20 2017 23: 07
      So the reactions of the West were not afraid when Hodor was imprisoned. Why do you all Putin’s fear so imagined? How is it possible in your right mind to think that the KGB man and judoka is afraid of something?
  8. +6
    April 15 2017 06: 42
    Quote: populist
    Of course, everything is correct in the article ... A quite worthy person - this Alisha

    Well, firstly, where did you see in my post at least a word about the worthy man of Usmanov or not? Show.
    Secondly, he explained only how the convicted person differs from the convicted person. All.
    I did not give any assessments of Usmanov’s activity either now or in the past.
    Take it easy. I do not understand your impact.
    1. 0
      April 15 2017 07: 42
      I did not give any assessments of Usmanov’s activity either now or in the past.
      Take it easy. I do not understand your impact.

      Are you a case not a lawyer? In your comment you took Usmanov under the protection. They also wrote that everything is correct in the article. what Read above - "demotivator Today, 06:36" "Hit", of course, not on you.
      1. +5
        April 15 2017 07: 49
        That has never defended Usmanov. From the word at all. Just explained the legal concepts. .
        No wonder that O. Bender used to say, Kitty, I respect the Criminal Code.
        1. 0
          April 15 2017 13: 03
          Quote: Smog
          Just explained the legal concepts.

          This is a direct Freudian reservation. So everything is done. By concepts.
          1. +6
            April 15 2017 13: 21
            Quote: Walanin
            This is a direct Freudian reservation.

            This is not Freud. This is Article 86 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In principle, the argument is about nothing.
    2. +6
      April 15 2017 08: 25
      Quote: Smog
      He explained only how the convicted person differs from the convicted person. All.

      Not all! Well, who cares, they are both tried! One departed, the other departs. This does not make one more honest than the other.
      So Usmanov (or Lurie), likewise tied to insignificant details, wants to show that if in the film, at some point it is not shown correctly, then the whole investigation is false. But, excuse me, there are oligarchs giving money to some kind of funds, there are DAM classmates managing this property, and in the end there is DAM using this property (he said it yourself!). So what difference does it make to us, how is this technically related? The fact is that it is.
      1. +1
        April 15 2017 13: 22
        and bulk is also a slanderer and a provocateur. And convicted.
      2. +5
        April 15 2017 13: 31
        Quote: Stas157
        Well, who cares, they are both tried! One departed, the other departed

        But the difference is that Leshik is serving, conditionally. And because he got hooked for 15 days, the court is generally obliged to close it, because this is a gross violation. But Leshik or someone is protecting or the authorities do not want to make him a prisoner of "conscience". They know all these undercurrents of them. Regarding the honesty of Usmanov, and where did you see an honest and fair businessman. This is nonsense.
        once sufficient profits are available, capital becomes bold. Provide 10%, and the capital agrees to any use, at 20% it becomes lively, at 50% it is positively ready to break its head, at 100% it violates all human laws, at 300% there is no crime that he would not risk, at least under pain of the gallows. If noise and abuse bring profit, capital will contribute to both. Evidence: smuggling and trafficking in slaves.

        - XNUMXth Century English Publicist Thomas Joseph Dunning
      3. 0
        April 20 2017 23: 12
        Well, there is, for example, the fact that I use the property of my classmates. I go to visit them, I sit on the sofas, I turn on the TV, I pour tea from the teapot. Oh you, I’m not otherwise corrupt! The only difference is that I am not influential, and my classmates are also not influential, while the influential Medvedev and classmates are not big. Probably, nevertheless, Medvedev, due to these circumstances, is a little more corrupt than me. I’m buying myself sneakers myself, not like these snickering ones.
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      April 15 2017 08: 10
      Quote: State Employee
      who will never become President of Russia

      Yesterday I saw “Niva”, on the rear window of which it was written - “Bulk-2018”.
      1. 0
        April 21 2017 13: 30
        Yesterday I saw a cornfield, on the rear window of which it was written: Dolbit normal'no.
  10. +1
    April 15 2017 08: 15
    the horse-drawn circus, which is up to the head in sleep mode, is disturbed not by how much it has stolen or crushed for itself, but by the fact that it’s time to send it to this government with ambassadors to Ukraine, since it’s not customary for us to objectively deal with activities a close circle of untouchables, this circle is only too wide and too untouchable, in general, the show continues
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    April 15 2017 08: 20
    Hang on a hook for the ribs in the Red Square
    1. +2
      April 15 2017 09: 54
      You better go learn Latin. We ourselves will decide what to do with our internal affairs.
      1. +2
        April 16 2017 12: 16
        Oho, what a speech! But isn’t it a favorite thing for Russians to teach others? How to strangle the "fifth column" in Belarus, to drive Bandera, in what language to write to the Kazakhs and so on. Has the full right to speak, and if you do not like it, change the rules of the site.
  12. +9
    April 15 2017 09: 53
    Alisher Usmanov is an honest man. How can we doubt it. :)
    1. +1
      April 15 2017 13: 23
      like bulk
  13. +6
    April 15 2017 10: 13
    The authorities believe that having dealt with A, Navalny, will it be possible to rob the country further? Mistaken error. Others will take his place. Only they will no longer be "playing with the authorities in the elections", and will end up having no fun in the name of the people.
  14. +2
    April 15 2017 11: 37
    Dear Alisher Usmanov, this is not an iPhone forgiveness !!!!
    1. +4
      April 15 2017 13: 05
      iPhone just did not serve 8 years for rape.
      1. +1
        April 15 2017 13: 24
        the bulk also has a criminal record.
        1. 0
          April 16 2017 12: 19
          Is that such an excuse? That’s interesting, by the way, with Usmanov in the zone did what they like to do with rapists in Russia?
    2. +2
      April 15 2017 13: 24
      if Medvedev responds to the bulk ... he will then have to sue a crowd of followers of bulk. He has nothing more to do .. like going to the courts.
      1. +4
        April 15 2017 15: 31
        FUND FOR SUPPORT OF SOCIALLY SIGNIFICANT STATE PROJECTS - the activities of the fund do not even fit with its name.
        If there weren’t even enough weighty facts about the corruption scheme of Dimon, how do you propose fighting corruption in the Russian Federation, how is it possible to ensure compliance with the law and the inevitability of punishment, which are constantly talked about by GDP and Dimon ??
        But, there are facts, and even the Investigative Committee does not check them, because all these structures are under authoritarian pressure and will not do anything to make it possible to hold those in power accountable.

        Come on, you naively say that the authorities are saints and they are worried that in Russia, despite all its resources, the quality of life is at the level of the poorest countries?

        For a change, take an interest in how much the average resident of developed EU countries spends on food per month when they say that we have high domestic prices, and how much the average resident of Russia spends on supposedly cheap energy and affordable prices, a fair comparison will not please you, but in EU countries even for the production of household appliances they use recycled materials due to the lack of their own resources, but somehow miraculously the standard of living is radically higher than ours.
  15. +5
    April 15 2017 12: 10
    One must be naive to believe that Navalny lives exclusively on Western aid. With all the laws on "foreign agents", with the close attention of the relevant authorities to NPOs, it would have long been pressed to the nail. So someone is blocking a serious run over him. And what organizational reserve is needed to organize all-Russian actions ?! The fact of the matter is that, along the way, part of the Russian elite patronizes him. It also has its own friction. Either one of his own is already digging under Medvedev, or they are thinking about what will happen when the GDP “retires”, because when he finishes his next presidential term, he will already be 71 year !!! In any case, the logic of the genre requires having its own pocket opposition in reserve. Yanukovych was feeding Tyagnibok, but he played along the way.
    1. 0
      April 20 2017 23: 20
      Well, it’s already almost obvious that this part of the top merged the vidos with the villas. Where there are no warring political clans?
  16. +4
    April 15 2017 12: 35
    Quote: forty-eighth
    Yes, even let them eat this Bulk and all his henchmen. Spit! Where is the verification of the Investigative Committee and the Prosecutor General's Office for Medvedev?

    Quote: Alexander S.
    Write a statement ... and then share the results.

    Here are the requirements

    Here is the answer to the deputy request to the prosecutor general’s office
    1. 0
      April 15 2017 13: 26
      Where is the written answer? Sometimes they also call me from the FSB. Well, the presidential administration.
      1. +1
        April 15 2017 13: 55
        Quote: Alexander S.
        Where is the written answer? Sometimes they also call me from the FSB. Well, the presidential administration.

        Are you also a deputy of the State Duma, since they are calling you from the presidential administration? hi

        Regarding the "written response" - it is clearly written that they will answer (or reschedule) on April 28th.
        1. 0
          April 16 2017 17: 32
          And I claim that they will answer on April 36th. Or is this person so authoritative that he needs to absolutely believe?
          1. 0
            April 16 2017 18: 25
            Quote: Alexander S.
            And I claim that they will answer on April 36th. Or is this person so authoritative that he needs to absolutely believe?

            Perhaps you are right, they can answer on the "lunar day of June 31" laughing
            But by law, they are still required.
            Rashkin made an official request to the prosecutor general
            Scan on Twitter Rashkina.
            https://mobile.twitter.com/RashkinV/status/844437

            Regarding the authority - they are obliged to answer the deputy’s request in accordance with the law.
            And it doesn’t matter what last name and authority the deputy has — at least Rashkin’s, at least Milonov’s, at least Pupkin’s.
            So "we will look at this circus." hi
  17. +6
    April 15 2017 16: 01
    1. The problem of justice in the Russian Federation (after the high-profile cases of Serdyukov, Vasilyeva, etc.) few people believe in the impartiality of the trial of Navalny.
    2. The income of families of government officials increased by 18% compared with the previous year, RBC calculated. For comparison, the salaries of Russians increased in 2016 by only 7,7%
    Read more at RBC:
    http://www.rbc.ru/economics/14/04/2017/58f0f79f9a
    7947f4c2da2fd4
    3. Actually, corruption goes off scale at all levels and for some reason parliamentary parties do not take up this theme, as a result, a vacuum is created. Selective landings of large officials are leveled by the same Serdyukov, Belyaninov, etc.
    4. The behavior of golden youth, the lack of social elevators, the poverty of most regions, the real separation of local authorities from people's problems.
    5. The decline in living standards against the backdrop of the foreign policy agenda, rightly responds to people with questions: Why are we building a bridge to the Crimea, and you can’t drive along the street, help to Syria, and where is the increase in pensions, etc.
    6. The behavior of Medvedev and other officials from the outside looks like an outright "gentleness", cynicism, arrogance rolls over.
    7. Bulk now needed, he just needed
  18. +2
    April 15 2017 20: 05
    The authorities are afraid of Navalny.
    1. +1
      April 15 2017 20: 10
      Quote: Rabinovich
      The authorities are afraid of Navalny.

      Quote: Rabinovich
      And could get into fish
    2. 0
      April 20 2017 23: 23
      Dadadad, Medvedev for fear even went skiing.
  19. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      April 16 2017 23: 33
      TwitSles Yesterday, 23:43 PM
      How pathetic they are. Did you hear that there are French Jacobins or the Russian Bolsheviks, upon arrest, fell on a hospital bed and pretended heart attack (not to mention the fact that with a real dictatorship this is useless)?

      stop In fairness, I must say that the Russian Bolsheviks also used this technique to avoid repression.
      Widely known episode from the biography of a revolutionary Camo. Even the film was made about it - “Personally Known” is called (Armenfilm 1957).
      I made a fragment

      Only now the "current revolutionaries" look against his background, more than sorry.
  20. +1
    April 17 2017 12: 52
    Navalny is similar to Gapon's priest .... they are planting around everyone, but he finds new ones and leads to protests. And they are being planted again. provocateur in the service of the FSB.
  21. 0
    April 17 2017 17: 33
    One innocent accuses another innocent.
  22. 0
    April 22 2017 13: 08
    Quote: Forester
    Gapon is not the same level as Azef was. He created one of the first trade unions in the Republic of Ingushetia and brought people out onto the street ... But Azef, then yeah !!! One of the highest paid agents of the 3rd branch. And how many provocations he has for his soul !!! From leaflets to assassination of officials and members of the royal family. And it was multiplied by zero because he- "both ours and yours, let's dance" and the reevolutionaries, in particular the Socialist-Revolutionaries, was just handed over by the secret police

    ... * Jews, Jews, only Jews around * * .... V. Vysotsky ..
    1. 0
      April 22 2017 13: 12
      Quote: ver_
      ... V. Vysotsky

      - this is not Vysotsky No.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"