Military Review

April 15: Is the US war against North Korea on the horizon?

134
In the Western media, the situation around the Korean Peninsula is gaining momentum. Any step by Kim Jong-un after Trump's statements about the readiness of “decisive action” is described only as “playing with fire”. In particular, the Western media, including CNN, issued for the "obvious preparation of North Korea for war" competition of special forces soldiers of the DPRK army, held annually a few days before the Day of the Sun. In the DPRK, the Day of the Sun is celebrated on April 15 - on the birthday of Kim Il Sung.

From the message Central Telegraph Agency North Korea:
Comrade Kim Jong Un watched the competition in landing and repelling the enemy's strike with the special forces of the people's army.


April 15: Is the US war against North Korea on the horizon?


Fighters of the special operations battalion of the 525 military unit of the Korean People's Army, as well as military personnel of the 4 shock group of the 5 separate detachment at the military unit 2625, 2 of the shock group 1 of the individual detachment of military unit 252 of the KPA Navy, 1 of the shock group of the 1 squadron of military unit 323 of the KPA Air Force, as well as a squadron of military transport airplanes and helicopters, etc.

The winner of the competition was the military personnel of the special operations battalion of the 525 KPA military unit.

Against this background, there continue to be reports that PLA troops have concentrated along the border with the DPRK. According to some reports, the official Beijing after the actions of Trump in Syria seriously fears that the United States is preparing to launch a missile attack on the objects of the KPA. For obvious reasons, they will not deliver a direct blow to the DPRK's nuclear infrastructure (at least they are counting on in Japan and South Korea), but to go for strikes on combined-arms facilities and delivery vehicles is completely.

Against this background, military experts are discussing the possibility of a retaliatory strike from the DPRK. One of the likely scenarios, according to CNBC experts, is the use of Kim Jong-un for retaliation of nuclear-powered submarines weapons on board. Is it worth it for the American media to make such bold assumptions about a real war with North Korea, taking into account the fact that there is neither oil nor a “moderate opposition” in the DPRK ...
Photos used:
http://www.kcna.kp
134 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Thrall
    Thrall April 13 2017 18: 17
    +29
    Trump with the DPRK screwed up!
    I bet you.
    I put a bag of potatoes.
    1. 210ox
      210ox April 13 2017 18: 20
      +12
      They also spoke about Iraq ..
      Quote: Thrall
      Trump with the DPRK screwed up!
      I bet you.
      I put a bag of potatoes.
      1. VVG
        VVG April 13 2017 18: 42
        +8
        But Iraq didn’t have nuclear weapons
        1. Arzoo
          Arzoo April 13 2017 18: 52
          +18
          So mark the day of the sun in Tokyo
          1. Olegovi4
            Olegovi4 April 13 2017 21: 16
            +2
            Quote: Arzoo
            So mark the day of the sun in Tokyo

            there and the road
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. alexmach
        alexmach April 13 2017 18: 45
        +6
        Well, they won’t get into Syria and Korea at the same time and, for example, in Yemen?
        1. Sasha Crimean
          Sasha Crimean April 13 2017 18: 49
          +21
          For a mad goat, seven miles is not a hook.
        2. Olegovi4
          Olegovi4 April 13 2017 21: 18
          +1
          Quote: alexmach
          Well, they won’t get into Syria and Korea at the same time and, for example, in Yemen?

          already climb. and also Iraq, Afghanistan, Europe. further down the list ...
          1. alexmach
            alexmach April 13 2017 22: 29
            +1
            Well, how many coffins do you need to send back to America so that they take their feet from there?
      3. Arzoo
        Arzoo April 13 2017 18: 48
        +6
        Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction. Trump will be picking mushrooms.
    2. MPK105
      MPK105 April 13 2017 18: 22
      +18
      I put the supply of annual canned food in the USA. (With all due respect to my grandchildren Juche) ... I am a realist ... repeat
      1. alexmach
        alexmach April 13 2017 18: 48
        +8
        This is on condition that they will still fight with the Koreans and not with the well-disguised Chinese, for example.
        Although the deployment of Chinese troops on the border somehow strange happened. We would like to help the Koreans would provide them with air defense systems, and so you look either they are really waiting for the flow of refugees, or they themselves are planning to invade and create a buffer zone.
        1. Pirogov
          Pirogov April 13 2017 19: 47
          +2
          Quote: alexmach
          This is on condition that they will still fight with the Koreans and not with the well-disguised Chinese, for example.
          Although the deployment of Chinese troops on the border somehow strange happened. We would like to help the Koreans would provide them with air defense systems, and so you look either they are really waiting for the flow of refugees, or they themselves are planning to invade and create a buffer zone.

          I don’t see anything strange, everything is in the spirit of today's China. The main business, and everything else is not important.
        2. Lavrenti Pavlovich
          Lavrenti Pavlovich April 13 2017 20: 30
          +11
          If it comes to the war in the DPRK, it would not hurt ours to deliver a massive blow to the United States and put an end to world evil.
          1. Black5Raven
            Black5Raven April 14 2017 01: 05
            +3
            You would have thought with your head a little, if there is anything else to think fool
          2. alexddd
            alexddd April 14 2017 10: 11
            +3
            Yesterday, one forum participant wrote a good idea - Sheeps under the leadership of a lion will always defeat lions under the leadership of a ram. And Churchill once said that if the state chooses between war and shame, it will receive war and shame as a result. May this cup pass us.
      2. feldscher
        feldscher April 13 2017 23: 03
        +1
        And the stock per person?))
        So I will support the big against the success of the United States.
        Also annual.
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS April 13 2017 18: 24
      +16
      Quote: Thrall
      I put a bag of potatoes.

      It’s certainly very clever to joke on the subject of war. Especially considering that women and children die in batches at the same time ... fool
      1. Thrall
        Thrall April 13 2017 18: 28
        +7
        There will be no war either, the armada will go away, and the patched Kremlin agent will continue Obama’s policy.
      2. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter April 13 2017 18: 31
        +7
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: Thrall
        I put a bag of potatoes.

        It’s certainly very clever to joke on the subject of war. Especially considering that women and children die in batches at the same time ... fool

        I agree with you, Andrew! Why are we better than those same possessed animals - mattresses, if we start betting on such events. I almost cared for myself, I confess ... repeat
      3. alex86
        alex86 April 13 2017 18: 52
        +3
        Quote: NEXUS
        while women and children die in batches ...

        it does not stop us in the Donbass ...
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 13 2017 19: 11
          +6
          Quote: alex86
          it does not stop us in the Donbass ...

          Who are you? Novorossiys are defending themselves, but Russia did not declare war on Ukraine ... so who do you want?
          1. alex86
            alex86 April 13 2017 19: 18
            +3
            Quote: NEXUS
            Russia did not declare war on Ukraine

            But without Russia there would be nothing there.
            Quote: NEXUS
            so who do you want?
            - you and I do not stop - I do not separate myself from Russia, even in its mistakes and crimes. And you, apparently, exist separately from our country. “Tips of an outsider” (V.I. Lenin, PSS, v. 34)?
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS April 13 2017 19: 24
              +10
              Quote: alex86
              But without Russia there would be nothing there.

              Without Russia, there would have been a massacre in the Donbass and in the Crimea ...
              - you and I do not stop - I do not separate myself from Russia, even in its mistakes and crimes.

              Do you think this is a crime?

              Quote: alex86
              And you, apparently, exist separately from our country.

              No dear, it’s you who have apparently just arrived from Mars.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS April 13 2017 19: 32
                  +10
                  Quote: alex86
                  - without Russia in the Donbass and in the Crimea there would have been no problems at all.

                  To remind you of the buses and trains full of radicals who were going to go to the Donbass and Crimea? However, after such a "smart" statement of yours, I consider our dialogue to be futile.
                  1. alex86
                    alex86 April 13 2017 20: 13
                    +2
                    Quote: NEXUS
                    Do you recall the buses and trains full of radicals who were going to go to the Donbass and Crimea?

                    A subtle remark, "going" - you said that. And if not for Russian support for separatism in Ukraine, no one would have gathered.
                    Quote: NEXUS
                    I consider our dialogue to be futile.

                    I absolutely agree, but this dialogue is not for you and me, but for others who read and reflect.
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS April 13 2017 20: 17
                      +12
                      Quote: alex86
                      And if not for Russian support for separatism in Ukraine,

                      Separatism? You then remove the pan from the head, dear. Is it the New Russians shelling kindergartens and schools in the Donbass? These are the new Russians in Odessa burning the House of Trade Unions.
                      Listen to me, Nazi, they will definitely not welcome you here. And in real life, they would have met, I’m sorry, you would have simply scribbled the scoreboard for your language.
                      1. alex86
                        alex86 April 13 2017 21: 27
                        0
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Separatism?

                        There would be no Russian support for separatism, they would have figured it out themselves.
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        Nazi
                        - Do not judge people by yourself, first; what does this follow from? Secondly.
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        And in real life, they would have met, I’m sorry, you would have simply scribbled the scoreboard for your language.
                        - tongue chatting - do not toss bags. I live in Kazan, come. But no - there’s nothing to talk about.
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        you
                        - did we drink vodka together or did we baptize children?
                    2. Ascetic
                      Ascetic April 13 2017 20: 28
                      +10
                      Quote: alex86
                      . And if not for Russian support for separatism in Ukraine, no one would have gathered.

                      Well, right Glory Kovtun one to one. These mantras are so hackneyed that the authors themselves probably do not believe in them. request
                    3. Olegovi4
                      Olegovi4 April 13 2017 21: 21
                      0
                      Quote: alex86
                      Russian support for separatism in Ukraine

                      so you are one of those ..pithets who also believe that the Russian people, by fate, left in a misunderstanding of 404, should have become Ukrainians and scream SUGS ?!
                    4. MMX
                      MMX April 14 2017 11: 16
                      +2
                      Quote: alex86

                      A subtle remark, "going" - you said that. And if not for Russian support for separatism in Ukraine, no one would have gathered.


                      There was no Russian support in Odessa, but people gathered. What came of this we all know.
                2. Mestny
                  Mestny April 13 2017 19: 38
                  +5
                  "The son of a DNR officer"? Are you telling us that "everything is not so straightforward"?
                  You can see the pan-heads per kilometer.
                  1. alex86
                    alex86 April 13 2017 20: 14
                    0
                    Quote: Mestny
                    per kilometer is visible.

                    This is good, which means that someone will see and think.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. Lavrenti Pavlovich
                        Lavrenti Pavlovich April 13 2017 21: 02
                        +3
                        The question of Ukraine, or rather Bandera, can be solved very quickly by destroying several thousand frostbites (descendants of Hitler’s incomplete henchmen and traitors who betrayed their ancestors who fought against the Nazis). The question is, who will assume such responsibility, because the Nazis, whose hands are in blood, cannot be re-educated? If Russia now enters troops, then many Ukrainians, who are brainwashed every day, will perceive Russia as invaders. It was necessary to introduce troops earlier. Now Ukrainians let them “enjoy” their Nazi power until this power brings them to a pen and they themselves ask for help from us. LDNR is very sorry, people die every day. It is a pity that there is no Stalin in the Kremlin, he would have decided very quickly and with little blood.
                      2. alex86
                        alex86 April 13 2017 21: 28
                        0
                        Quote: NEXUS
                        grandfather policeman apparently served properly

                        do not judge people by yourself. With arguments, is it tense, go to the person?
            2. Odysseus
              Odysseus April 13 2017 19: 31
              +5
              Quote: alex86
              - you and I do not stop - I do not separate myself from Russia, even in its mistakes and crimes. And you, apparently, exist separately from our country. “Tips of an outsider” (V.I. Lenin, PSS, v. 34)?

              You directly support the anti-communist Kiev junta, but you are quoting Lenin.
              This is nonsense or an attempt to cheat.
              There is not the slightest reason for the residents of Donbass to obey the people who seized power in Kiev on February 22, 2014. They made their choice.
              Ukrainian occupiers must leave the Donbass. And Russia has every right to help them in this.
              1. alex86
                alex86 April 13 2017 19: 42
                +1
                Quote: Odyssey
                directly support the anti-communist Kiev junta

                what does this follow from?
                Quote: Odyssey
                while quoting Lenin.
                - If necessary, I can quote, but in this case it’s more likely to the NEXUS troll using the common name of Lenin’s article, which has nothing to do with it.
                Quote: Odyssey
                There is not the slightest reason for the residents of Donbass to obey the people who seized power in Kiev on February 22, 2014. They made their choice.
                - generally speaking, I agree, to the same extent that there is no reason for the inhabitants of Chechnya to obey the people who seized power in Moscow on December 31, 1999, as well as the rest of the citizens of Russia (who are citizens, not just residents). However, with this approach, Russia (as well as Ukraine) risks disintegrating and ceasing to exist. Do you support this? Me not. True, for now ...
                1. Odysseus
                  Odysseus April 13 2017 20: 22
                  +6
                  Quote: alex86
                  what does this follow from?

                  From the fact that you are talking about the Donbass as the territory of Ukraine, which it is not, because the residents of Donbass did not support the Maidan coup.
                  Quote: alex86
                  I agree, to the same extent that for the residents of Chechnya there is no reason to obey the people who seized power in Moscow on December 31, 1999, as well as the rest of the citizens of Russia (who are citizens, not just residents).

                  People seized power in Moscow in October 1993, but then the Chechen authorities actively supported the Yeltsin putsch, so that their further actions to separate the Yeltsin regime from power are pure separatism.
                  On December 31, 1999, there was no seizure of power (from the point of view of the laws of Yeltsin’s Russia), and there was the resignation of citizen Yeltsin in accordance with a signed decree.
                  1. alex86
                    alex86 April 13 2017 21: 41
                    +1
                    Quote: Odyssey
                    You are talking about the Donbass as the territory of Ukraine, of which it is not
                    - i.e., Russian President Putin V.V. for you is not a pointer (and apparently not the president)? Is there a Decree (at least) on recognizing the DPR / LPR as independent entities that are not part of Ukraine?
                    Quote: Odyssey
                    On December 31, 1999 there was no seizure of power (from the point of view of the laws of Yeltsin Russia), and there was the resignation of citizen Yeltsin in accordance with a signed decree
                    - then in Ukraine, President Yanukovych cowardly quit his post and withdrew from management, and the legally elected Verkhovna Rada (which I did not like either then or now), acting in the circumstances, did what it did. But this is their Rada, we may not like all this a hundred times, but this is not a reason to "bite" pieces of territory from a country in a difficult situation (imagine, in the 91st, when there was practically no power, Finland would take away Karelia , China - Primorye, Japan - Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands, Germany - the Kaliningrad region, Latvia - the Pytalovsky region (well, it’s small, and Latvia with a fig size), Norway (I will fantasize) - New land, and the Kola Peninsula with the Finns could be played How do you like it?
                    1. Odysseus
                      Odysseus April 13 2017 22: 16
                      +1
                      Quote: alex86
                      - i.e., Russian President Putin V.V. for you is not a pointer (and apparently not the president)? Is there a Decree (at least) on recognizing the DPR / LPR as independent entities that are not part of Ukraine?

                      Donbass is not the territory of Ukraine from the point of view of the citizens of Donbass themselves, only they have the right to control their fate. I support them in this.
                      If you appeal to the opinion of the Russian authorities then your complaints are generally incomprehensible, from the point of view of our authorities we are not a subject of conflict in Ukraine.
                      Quote: alex86
                      - then in Ukraine, President Yanukovych cowardly quit his post and withdrew from management

                      He did not cowardly quit his post, but was illegally overthrown with the help of representatives of gangs. This has nothing to do with the completely legal procedure for Yeltsin's voluntary resignation.
                      Quote: alex86
                      But this is their Rada, we may not like all this a hundred times, but this is not a reason to "bite off" pieces of territory from a country in a difficult situation

                      We didn’t bite anyone. Once again, in Ukraine there was an armed coup d'etat, those who supported it form the new Ukrainian statehood, to which they have every right (for example, citizens of the Lviv region), those who did not support (Crimea, Donbass ) have the full right to self-determination. Whether they want to enter self-determination in Russia, or anywhere else, or whether they will become independent is their business.
                      Quote: alex86
                      (imagine, in the 91st, when there was practically no power,

                      In 1991, we had quite legitimate authority, so there is no analogy.
                      There is an analogy since 1993, when the Yeltsin group illegally seized power. And if, then, say, the Kaliningrad region said that it would not recognize the power of the putschists and disconnected, then it would have every right to do so. None of this happened, everyone voted in favor Thus, the Constitution and the State Duma elections, in this way the new government gained legality. Similarly, now in Ukraine, Maidan power is legal everywhere except in Crimea and Donbass.
                      1. alex86
                        alex86 April 13 2017 22: 56
                        +2
                        Quote: Odyssey
                        was illegally overthrown with the help of representatives of gangs

                        It would have been if he had been forcibly removed, and he got scared and fled.
                        Quote: Odyssey
                        an armed coup d'etat took place in Ukraine,
                        - but at the same time, the legal authorities remained - the Verkhovna Rada, so the continuity of power remained and the state did not go away.
                        Quote: Odyssey
                        In 1991, we had quite legitimate authority, so there is no analogy.
                        - an absolute analogy, even worse: the state ceased to exist, but no one encroached on our territory.
                        And let me congratulate you (perhaps not you personally) - the Banshee administrator has paid attention to your requests and I will be blocked in three days. You are happy? With whom will you swear? They’ve already blocked me at the “censor”, now I’ll be honored here. For me it is a high mark. Thank.
        2. MMX
          MMX April 14 2017 11: 17
          0
          Quote: alex86
          Quote: NEXUS
          while women and children die in batches ...

          it does not stop us in the Donbass ...


          Do you mean Ukraine? Just the flag in the profile confused me, so I asked.
          1. alex86
            alex86 April 16 2017 22: 15
            0
            What is it that comes out, I'm sitting in Kazan, and I have the Ukrainian flag? It turns out that you can’t believe them (flags, in the sense) at all - then what is the point in them.
            Or is it such an irony - like you did not guess that "us" is Russia? Appreciated ...
            1. MMX
              MMX April 17 2017 07: 50
              0
              Quote: alex86
              What is it that comes out, I'm sitting in Kazan, and I have the Ukrainian flag? It turns out that you can’t believe them (flags, in the sense) at all - then what is the point in them.
              Or is it such an irony - like you did not guess that "us" is Russia? Appreciated ...


              No irony. Strict facts: in three years from the bombing (and not only) by the Ukrainian troops of Donbass, not a few children and women died. You have a Russian flag, but you said about Ukraine, that’s what you specified.
              I have no more questions for you.
    4. Vladimir 38
      Vladimir 38 April 13 2017 18: 25
      +2
      I support, there will be no war. And if the Americans survived out of their minds, little will not seem to anyone
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER April 13 2017 18: 28
        +5
        It will be, Kim Jong-un, I think will correctly respond to the American provocation. This is not a "stab in the back with tomatoes."
        1. hirurg
          hirurg April 13 2017 18: 36
          +6
          Yes, I feel that the Americans rolled off the coils. It smells like a big war. They climb directly. Everywhere. Therefore, sadly, ....
          1. alex86
            alex86 April 13 2017 18: 59
            +2
            Quote: hirurg
            They climb directly.

            Just like us.
            Quote: hirurg
            Everywhere
            - we don’t have enough money for “everywhere”, otherwise we would have climbed ...
            Quote: hirurg
            It smells like a big war.
            - I agree, everyone who remembered the great war has already left. And those who are now in power are in the illusion of the permissibility of war - both with them and with us ...
            1. Mestny
              Mestny April 13 2017 19: 40
              +1
              Well, for sure - a horse. A careful one ...
              1. alex86
                alex86 April 13 2017 20: 15
                0
                Quote: Mestny
                A careful one ...

                Jew, probably ...
          2. DV Coms
            DV Coms April 13 2017 21: 02
            +1
            By and large, the mattresses have no other options and there is less time, the green soap bubble is too pouted, China is bypassing, Russia is growing.
      2. VVG
        VVG April 13 2017 18: 41
        +5
        Say this to Iraq Vietnam Livy the same North Korea Yugoslavia and another country where the Americans are not crazy
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Gradus HuK
      Gradus HuK April 13 2017 18: 47
      +1
      The terrorist states will get in a brazen face if they try to attack the DPRK! And they are well aware of this. ,, Show''continues!
      1. MPK105
        MPK105 April 13 2017 18: 55
        +4
        Yes, peasants like ours are not Christian, I agree ... hi It’s just that the body reacts like that (defensive reaction, as the doctor explained to me one wink ) to the news, trying to translate them, these news jokingly translate ... Although ... What are the jokes, essno ....
    7. Tusv
      Tusv April 13 2017 18: 51
      0
      Quote: Thrall
      Trump with the DPRK screwed up!
      I bet you.

      Ti Rex left with this wording - I bent Putin. The very lamp of democracy left China - I bent Xi.
      Yes figs with them with ambition, feathers plucked at the American dermocracy
      1. Ascetic
        Ascetic April 13 2017 20: 41
        +3
        Quote: Tusv
        Quote: Thrall
        Trump with the DPRK screwed up!
        I bet you.

        Ti Rex left with this wording - I bent Putin. The very lamp of democracy left China - I bent Xi.
        Yes figs with them with ambition, feathers plucked at the American dermocracy

        Now there was news that China harshly warned the United States of the inadmissibility of a military strike on the DPRK through the English-language publication of the People's Daily
        1. Tusv
          Tusv April 13 2017 21: 13
          0
          Quote: Ascetic
          Now there was news that China harshly warned the United States about the inadmissibility of a military strike on the DPRK

          And so Rex left Moscow spat upon. Why did he come? They probably thought that the Kremlin would sanction yet another American atrocities. here you need to check travel expenses
    8. DEPARTMENT
      DEPARTMENT April 13 2017 18: 56
      +5
      Quote: Thrall
      Trump with the DPRK screwed up!
      I bet you.
      I put a bag of potatoes.

      I support! I put an oil tank ... wassat
    9. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 13 2017 19: 50
      0
      If he starts a war, he’s not screwed up.
  2. Thirteenth
    Thirteenth April 13 2017 18: 26
    +2
    When are the Americans already fighting ?!
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER April 13 2017 18: 30
      +1
      That's when everyone will obey, and if you don’t obey, then get "tomahawks."
    2. CAT BAIYUN
      CAT BAIYUN April 13 2017 18: 59
      +9
      When are the Americans already fighting ?!

      Until this island is washed away, they will be drawn out.
    3. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky April 13 2017 20: 23
      0
      Quote: Thirteenth
      When are the Americans already fighting ?!

      When they rake in the tail and mane, then they will calm down. Until now, so far everything has gotten away with them.
    4. albert
      albert April 13 2017 20: 25
      +2
      When they receive the horns, then they will fight.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS April 13 2017 20: 48
        +2
        Quote: albert
        When they receive the horns, then they will fight.

        Did they "fight" strongly after Korea and Vietnam?
        1. albert
          albert April 13 2017 20: 58
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          Did they "fight" strongly after Korea and Vietnam?

          Hmm, it means they didn’t beat much. Bad one few countries are able to REALLY hatch the Yankees.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. Cheshire
      Cheshire April 13 2017 18: 45
      +2
      Thanks for the analytics. yes
      Very informative. wassat
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 13 2017 19: 54
      +2
      Only in Vietnam there were no cruise missiles, planning bombs and UAVs, as well as modern reconnaissance and target designation systems. The entire DPRK is now in full view and any missile launches from its territory are tracked online.
  4. jovanni
    jovanni April 13 2017 18: 27
    +15
    Comrade Eun is such a cheerful, cheerful uncle! Apparently the soul of any campaign. I hope the campaign with the Americans will also be behind him. Good luck, merry Eun! Maybe at least you have enough dust to stop the mattresses. We did not see enough ...
    1. 0255
      0255 April 13 2017 18: 38
      +3
      Quote: Jovanni
      We did not see enough ...

      Go fight for North Korea in case of war laughing
      1. alex86
        alex86 April 13 2017 19: 02
        +2
        Quote: 0255
        Go fight for North Korea in case of war

        Yes, and just go to the DPRK ...
        1. 0255
          0255 April 13 2017 19: 42
          +4
          Quote: alex86
          Quote: 0255
          Go fight for North Korea in case of war

          Yes, and just go to the DPRK ...

          When there were cons on the site, the local Jucheists minus the offers to go live in North Korea, which suggests that they saw Juche ideas in real life in their grave.
          1. Olegovi4
            Olegovi4 April 13 2017 21: 47
            +1
            Quote: 0255
            When the site had cons

            then you and people like you drove away in the direction of the skulls. now for you laf
            1. 0255
              0255 April 13 2017 22: 04
              0
              Quote: Olegovi4
              Quote: 0255
              When the site had cons

              then you and people like you drove away in the direction of the skulls. now for you laf

              Then I was a marshal wink And for my opinion it was not a sin to grab minuses laughing
  5. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy April 13 2017 18: 27
    +3
    Any move of Kim Jong-un after Trump's statements about the readiness of “decisive action” is described only as a “game with fire."
    Rather, Trump is playing with fire. “Hide matches from children!” As well as inexperienced politicians.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 13 2017 19: 57
      +1
      Trump cannot play with fire - since he himself is fire.
  6. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor April 13 2017 18: 27
    +3
    Now let's see who has the most courage and something seems to me the cowardly terrorists of the FSA will merge again.
    Much depends on whether the "big uncles" stand up for the people of the DPRK.
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER April 13 2017 18: 33
      +2
      Did they stay? China seems to have merged ...
      1. zoolu300
        zoolu300 April 13 2017 20: 03
        +4
        The PRC has not merged anywhere, if there is an agreement between the leadership of the CPC and the Fed owners on the destruction of the industry of the South Caucasus and Japan, the PRC will fulfill its part of the agreement.
        1. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 April 13 2017 21: 27
          +2
          Quote: zoolu300
          China did not merge anywhere

          Well, this song seems to be getting relevant again:
    2. feldscher
      feldscher April 13 2017 23: 13
      0
      And the uncles will not be able to slope, the mainland is one.
  7. HAM
    HAM April 13 2017 18: 33
    +4
    "... there is neither oil nor" moderate opposition "in the DPRK

    INTERESTING, but is there a US embassy? If not, then little will come of it ...
    1. 0255
      0255 April 13 2017 18: 37
      +2
      Quote: HAM
      "... there is neither oil nor" moderate opposition "in the DPRK
      INTERESTING, but is there a US embassy? If not, then little will come of it ...

      Yes, the poor and hungry North Koreans without any US embassy will run away and will not want to fight for their "leader." Would you like to live like North Koreans?
      1. HAM
        HAM April 13 2017 18: 42
        +7
        Have you been there?
        1. 0255
          0255 April 13 2017 18: 51
          +1
          Quote: HAM
          Have you been there?

          Was not. But who was, they say that there is nothing good there, the network is full of photos of skinny North Koreans.
          1. commbatant
            commbatant April 13 2017 19: 22
            +5

            0
            0255 Today, 18: 51Not been. But who was, they say that there is nothing good there


            You are like in the Union: "I didn’t read Pasternak, but I condemn ....."

            Quince in a parallel article about the DPRK, I posted a good video about the DPRK, I would have fought for such a country (at least in order to delay the time the war arrived in my country)


            We will all be there ...
          2. Kenneth
            Kenneth April 13 2017 19: 41
            +5
            This suggests that people have money for expensive fitness and diets.
          3. nadezhiva
            nadezhiva April 13 2017 19: 52
            +3
            Quote: 0255
            They say that there is nothing good there, the network is full of photos of skinny North Koreans.
            Say nothing, but skinny Koreans should live longer than fat Yankees laughing
          4. HAM
            HAM April 14 2017 09: 25
            +1
            The same sources claim that in Russia the last hedgehogs eat up ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. VVG
        VVG April 13 2017 18: 49
        +1
        I would not doubt the power of propaganda
  8. filatik
    filatik April 13 2017 18: 38
    +1
    No matter how much we talk about those who have more, the result is one-end to all living things
    1. The comment was deleted.
  9. VVG
    VVG April 13 2017 18: 38
    +3
    The military is a conflict that is growing in the region. It will affect not only Korea, since Korea may have nuclear weapons and missiles that can transport them. It can greatly affect the neighboring countries, namely, Japan, China, and of course, the east of Russia, that is, the Kuril Islands can be damaged. Since it is proctically nearby. Well, according to politicians, Korea can milk up to Vashenkton in the case of someone there is no conflict. Well, I think that this is just an act of intimidation or a game of nerves with each other which can lead to consequences in the region. We need to understand that Korea’s actions do not provide other solutions to this situation as a military conflict. After the American fleet appeared in this region, another person appeared in this region who does not understand what’s in his head, since after the Americans launched rockets on Syria, you do not expect what to expect from Trump. But Yeshe and Kim are also unclear what is going on in this person’s head so that it’s possible and there’s no one to conflict as they say, they will measure and calm down

    P.S. sorry for mistakes
  10. cariperpaint
    cariperpaint April 13 2017 18: 40
    +3
    and in Busan Varangian at a party ...
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER April 13 2017 18: 42
      +2
      Oh, in vain he pushed himself there.
      1. tank66
        tank66 April 13 2017 18: 53
        +5
        whose - it’s in vain .a to take our Sorge. and, in general, their own.
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 13 2017 20: 00
        0
        Our embassy to evacuate.
  11. activator
    activator April 13 2017 18: 49
    +2
    This sitashka resembles a drisch who, three times lifting a dumbbell, stands in front of a mirror and shows himself biceps, in what a big way. Here passes by kachek, you that threaten me in the forehead. I think who is who in this allegory guess yourself. yes (Oh, you need a smiley that denotes theatrical bows) lol
  12. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN April 13 2017 18: 57
    +9
    North Korea has neither oil nor moderate opposition

    But warrior states kapets as needed.
  13. DEPARTMENT
    DEPARTMENT April 13 2017 19: 01
    +8
    The next escalation of tension aimed at China and Russia in the first place ..! The US needs to write off its huge debts and Trump understands this very well and knows that they are written off if a massacre is organized in this region with the involvement of China, well, Russia .. And there Japan!
    1. feldscher
      feldscher April 13 2017 23: 19
      0
      If Japan is attracted, then the loss of Amer.baza will force the United States to start a couple more local wars))
  14. donavi49
    donavi49 April 13 2017 19: 23
    +9
    Well xnumx numbers will be a nuclear test and missile launches. This is 15%. For it should be noted 100 birthday of the Father of the Nation and the Sun of the fatherland. Moreover, satellites record the intensification of work at the Mantapsan training ground. That is - they will blow it up again (this is a nuclear testing ground).

    What will be the answer?

    So far, everything is very muddy, if we discard any unconfirmed data, then only the ban on the sale of coal in the DPRK from China, with the reversal of trading ships, will be missed.


    As for the chances, the DPRK has a maximum program - to destroy the megacities and super plants of the South.

    The 35 km zone will almost certainly be burned - because it cannot be controlled quickly, there are thousands of guns and the 300mm MLRS in a mountainous area, with tunnels and interchangeable positions.

    300km zone - most likely they will thoroughly destroy it, and 75% of the population and almost the entire industry. However, the question arises here: were they able to cram the SCS into the Scud's dimensions? Well, if you didn’t push it, then you shouldn’t relax, they have advanced Gaziks, and not just chlorine ones — they will come in quite well for any anthills. It is also quite realistic, they have a bacteriological and most likely, they do not hesitate to use it again in megacities, because there is nothing to lose.

    The 500km zone is the remainder of Korea, however there the abandoned weight is less and the launch / missiles are much less.

    Before Japan - it is extremely doubtful that it will be a fuse to beat. Single will most likely intercept.

    2-3 submarine missile carriers are boats based on the 629 project, which at the end of the 50's began to plow the oceans. The complex is there a la P-21. In any case, it is hardly further than 1500 km.

    To the coast - it’s only from the tables, and they will die in the first hours, because all the coordinates are known.

    Otherwise, no hope:
    - a fleet museum, which is a pity to drown, the basis of RCC P-15M. There are few new stealth boats on Chinese and their light missiles (such as Exoset or X35). Maybe they can do something.
    - the submarine fleet, the main boat, the roaring cow of the 633 project, which also plows the oceans from 50's. There is still a small boat, which is quieter on 2 TA and saboteurs, but the trouble is that the southerners caught one boat and carefully examined everything.
    - The Air Force, the bulk of the MiG-17 / 19 / 21 - the best they can do, get in touch with a half-ton-ton Explosives and play kamikaze, maybe the mountains will help them. Those single MiG-29 which without modernization and with a dubious% readiness (due to self-made service) are unlikely to become a serious threat today, they did not cause any particular problems in 91.
    - Air defense, the bulk of C-75 and C-125, there are C-200, a lot of Arrows and systems on another chassis but with the same module. A lot of MANPADS. But today it is a museum. It would be a miracle if they hit at least 10-ok manned aircraft. The complex is in question, there is no data on it.

    Well, the ground army, if there is a ground operation, it will become the most serious challenge for the southern OK. For nature itself helps them - there is a very difficult terrain and in the first war, the Americans went through the main ridges with ceremonial columns, for the army was welded in a cauldron / scattered. Then, when Mao helped bring the 37 parallel back, not a single UN offensive was successful. Therefore, there will be a cut - if the groundman decides to start.

    Ah, surely there were placed cores in all important directions, because the dimension is no longer important and the very 10-20 charges can really stop and cause great damage to the southerners, if they trample to the north.
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus April 13 2017 19: 38
      +2
      Quote: donavi49
      As for the chances, the DPRK has a maximum program - to destroy the megacities and super plants of the South.

      In fact, even the combined forces of US aggressors + puppets (South Caucasus, Japan) without the use of nuclear weapons have no chance of victory against the DPRK.
      But there will be no war.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 13 2017 20: 07
        +1
        They have huge chances, as well as arsenals of cruise missiles and bombs, in the event of a war, the United States will use all its strategic aviation - they will simply blow the DPRK.
        1. Odysseus
          Odysseus April 13 2017 20: 27
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          They have huge chances, as well as arsenals of cruise missiles and bombs, in the event of a war, the United States will use all its strategic aviation - they will simply blow the DPRK.

          This is an empty abstraction, in fact, the “armada” now has a maximum of 300 Tomahawks. This is a pin prick for the DPRK, and Seoul will be destroyed in response, which makes senseless war for the South Caucasus.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 April 13 2017 20: 49
            0
            We don’t know who will strike first, and when it will, maybe the US strategic aircraft will strike it, and then surface ships will connect, we don’t know if these aircraft carriers have tactical nuclear bombs.
            1. Odysseus
              Odysseus April 13 2017 21: 41
              0
              Quote: Vadim237
              We don’t know who will strike first, and when it will be

              We know, the USA, the DPRK has no reason to start the war first, thereby becoming aggressors.
              Quote: Vadim237
              maybe the strategic aviation of the USA will inflict it, and then surface ships will be connected,

              The first blow is inflicted on air defense facilities and nuclear facilities. No B-52 will send an unsupported anti-aircraft defense. Well, even if it does, it will not cancel the attack on Seoul. The DPRK has too many missiles, and Seoul is too close to the front line. And by the way, there are no signs of the US preparing for such a full-scale action .
              Quote: Vadim237
              we don’t know if these aircraft carriers have tactical nuclear bombs.

              I write, "there is no chance without nuclear weapons
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 April 13 2017 23: 54
                0
                "No one will send a B-52 to unsupported air defense." The DPRK has it liquid, and the B 52, B1 and B2 are armed with AGM 86 strategic cruise missiles, which are normally equipped, as well as long-range gliding AGM 158 missiles with a range of 980 kilometers, AGM 154 bombs with a range of 560 kilometers - strategic aviation It is in constant readiness, and the necessary weapons can be hung up overnight.
    2. commbatant
      commbatant April 13 2017 20: 44
      +1
      donavi49 Today, 19:23 PM


      - the submarine fleet, the main boat, the roaring cow of the 633 project, which also plows the oceans from 50's. There is still a small boat, which is quieter on 2 TA and saboteurs, but the trouble is that the southerners caught one boat and carefully examined everything.


      May put minefields in the waters of the Sea of ​​Japan and the ports of the Republic of Kazakhstan / Japan (unlikely), as a result of a violation of shipping (in other words, it will only cause losses to US competitors in the Asia-Pacific region) ....

      Air Force, the bulk of the MiG-17/19/21 - the best they can do, get in touch with a half-ton-ton Explosives and play in kamikaze
      (there are older models still in storage) - there will be good kamikazes (they will not dive into residential areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan, I think KPA intelligence knows B and BT storage bases, ports, oil storage facilities) ....

      - Air defense, the bulk of S-75 and S-125, there is S-200
      S-200 is a strong thing - 240 km, but difficult to maintain, and the S-125 "Old Man" is unlikely to modernize ....

      Well, the ground army, if there is a ground operation
      only in a terrible dream, the KPA will be destroyed from afar, driven into the depths of the KPA island and they will destroy all the KP and all.
      Although I would have carried out a limited naval landing operation in the north of the DPRK in the United States, in order to cut off the DPRK from the Russian Federation, otherwise a “good” RF would arrange for the DPRK the “Korean express” then the DPRK will be able to fight forever (I think warehouses of the former SA, a lot of interesting things, there are in addition to 17 million AK) ....

      And in our place, in the North of the DPRK, it was possible to deploy field camps with the "Ministry of Emergencies of the Russian Federation" ...

      I'm more interested in how the Japanese and ROK currencies fall on the Tokyo and Hong Kong exchanges?
      In short, no matter how it ends, it will be bad only for the DPRK and US competitors in the Asia-Pacific region ...
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 13 2017 23: 58
        +1
        As the fighting begins, immediately bet on lowering Asian futures - profits can be substantial.
  15. kouldoom
    kouldoom April 13 2017 19: 28
    0
    I first saw North Koreans in armor jellies
  16. lance
    lance April 13 2017 19: 33
    +3
    yes bury you all who will say how many of the 70 boats lay in California? Trump-settled, if he believes that the DPRK is Syria. 30x5x 10 = 1500 non-nuclear attacks on the United States by a small DPRK country? tram booby!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 13 2017 20: 08
      +1
      "Yes, bury you all who say how many of the 70 boats lay in California." Zero - that's how much.
    2. pshek
      pshek April 14 2017 23: 10
      0
      And you further about this museum ... One modern submarine is enough to sink this "formidable" force.
      1. lance
        lance April 18 2017 05: 27
        +1
        This is probably why during the years of the Great Patriotic War 41-45 the best submarine fleet of Germany suffered such losses from the outdated fleet of the USSR?
        1. region58
          region58 April 19 2017 01: 08
          0
          Quote: Lance
          This is probably why during the years of the Great Patriotic War 41-45 the best submarine fleet of Germany suffered such losses from the outdated fleet of the USSR?

          https://topwar.ru/35704-analiz-effektivnosti-sove
          tskih-podvodnyh-lodok-v-velikoy-otechestvennoy-vo
          yne.html
          https://topwar.ru/35677-7-luchshih-podlodok-vtoro
          y-mirovoy.html
  17. Mestny
    Mestny April 13 2017 19: 43
    +2
    Quote: 0255
    But who was, they say that there is nothing good there, the network is full of photos of skinny North Koreans

    And the network is full of photos of how Assad personally poisoned unfortunate children with sarin, for example.
    And the authors suddenly - and the same.
  18. Mestny
    Mestny April 13 2017 19: 45
    +5
    Quote: donavi49
    Well xnumx numbers will be a nuclear test and missile launches. This is 15%. For it should be noted 100 birthday of the Father of the Nation and the Sun of the fatherland. Moreover, satellites record the intensification of work at the Mantapsan training ground. That is - they will blow it up again (this is a nuclear testing ground).

    What will be the answer?

    Are you aware of the situation? a sovereign country, in its sovereign territory, performs certain actions necessary for its security, which do not directly affect neighboring countries.
    And suddenly someone demands an answer for this.
    Doesn’t it bother you?
    1. Petrol cutter
      Petrol cutter April 13 2017 21: 16
      +2
      Everything is really confusing.
    2. Black5Raven
      Black5Raven April 14 2017 01: 12
      0
      For example, the fact that nuclear weapons tests (as well as development) are prohibited.
      1. Nehist
        Nehist April 14 2017 03: 09
        +2
        DG DPRK did not sign this agreement so they are in their own right
  19. Oleg Petrov
    Oleg Petrov April 13 2017 20: 23
    0
    If the North Koreans have a surprise (the type of submarine on the ground off the coast of the USA with ya.o.) is in stock - Trapon will not dare to strike. We definitely do not need this war - at the borders, we need to help the DPRK
    1. pshek
      pshek April 14 2017 23: 12
      0
      And you further about this museum ... One modern submarine is enough to sink this "formidable" force.

      There are no pl-ks there, especially with yao. DPRK does not have such a technique!
  20. The comment was deleted.
    1. aiden
      aiden April 13 2017 21: 50
      +2
      if we could not at the time when we had the most powerful army in the world, then where to this clown. Only the country will be destroyed, but his army will flee. His own and hang. No chance here. And he behaves in such a way as not to lose credibility among his citizens. I repeat, it will give slack, and they will hang him. How many naive people are there.
      1. Olegovi4
        Olegovi4 April 13 2017 22: 19
        +1
        Quote: aiden
        will give slack, and they will hang him.

        it turns out without options. either your own or newcomers. so why trifle? "die like that with music." and where does the naivete come from? it would be naive to believe that Kim will be promised peace in return for disarmament and will keep her promises.
      2. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 April 13 2017 22: 19
        +3
        Quote: aiden
        His own and hang. No chance here.

        Enemy propaganda in North Korea does not spree. But the government radio, sort of like, is forbidden to turn off.
      3. lance
        lance April 18 2017 05: 13
        +1
        Sorry, dear, but you are naive. remember the USSR and the brain of the army and the people, now it is in the DPRK. He wants the fate of Gaddafi, etc.-no. how long the Afghan lasted, and yet there they didn’t think about Yao. the test of nuclear weapons on its territory - and so far no one has proved the infection of neighboring territories, but from the USA there is a clear expansion - so what would the small "freedom-loving" people of the DPRK (USSR) do?
      4. lance
        lance April 18 2017 05: 21
        +1
        what could not? from reconnaissance aircraft to Boeing and ships. Vietnam, Korea, Cuba, and if small, open the history of collisions, we are not so good ...
  21. DV Coms
    DV Coms April 13 2017 21: 19
    +1
    Quote: 0255
    Quote: HAM
    Have you been there?

    Was not. But who was, they say that there is nothing good there, the network is full of photos of skinny North Koreans.
    1. DV Coms
      DV Coms April 13 2017 21: 25
      +2
      Interestingly, and from whose photographs do you study the thinness of the S. Koreans, from the Washington Post, New York Times or Censor?
  22. Herman 4223
    Herman 4223 April 13 2017 21: 48
    0
    The Koreans are unlikely to hit cities with nuclear weapons, it makes no sense, but they can star up in the fleet.
  23. Olegovi4
    Olegovi4 April 13 2017 22: 10
    0
    heated discussions. who is for the war, who is against. however, everyone wants to watch reports about another war game while sitting at home. not only children - the Pepsi generation. but everyone was hooked on the "pictures" from the box.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 14 2017 00: 04
      +1
      You can go to the DPRK - find yourself in the very center of events, with unforgettable impressions.
    2. Kolaaps
      Kolaaps April 14 2017 09: 24
      0
      As I understand it ... pull up brothers ... Dry alcohol salt matches rubber bands ... oh yes! hammock - vital! A pack of gandons .... Ugh! Skidded, sorry .... Well, on Senka hat - on e .... th mother's sofa!
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Shukshin
    Shukshin April 14 2017 10: 29
    +1
    Anglo-Saxons built a base on the moon, or what? Or do they think the islands sit out?