Military Review

Members of the "Council of the Federation" on the possible use of air defense in Syria

124
In the event of a new US strike on Syria, the Russian military uses all available means to protect their facilities in Syria, reports Interfax Statement by the Head of the Committee on Defense and Security of the Federation Council, Viktor Ozerov.



Russia reserves the right to ensure security aviation base and logistics point in Tartus, no matter where threats originate: from land, from air or from the sea,
said Ozerov, commenting on the recent statement by White House spokesman Shawn Spicer about the possibility of new strikes by the US on Syria in the event of a repeated chemical attack.

He noted that "the reliability of the security system of Russian military facilities is guaranteed by the C-300 and C-400 complexes, which are located on Russian bases."

In turn, the first deputy head of the international committee of the Federation Council, Vladimir Dzhabarov, said that Russia would not use its weapons against American missiles to prevent them from falling into Syrian territory.

No, we will not do that
- answered Jabarov to the question of whether the Russian VKS can support the Syrian armed forces in case of a second strike by the United States.

We can not be drawn into armed confrontation, it threatens a large-scale war,
added on.

At the same time, Jabarov urged the White House to "drop ambitions and not indulge in emotions in the Syrian issue." "Especially you should not indulge in the emotions of the daughter of the President of the United States," - he said.

Earlier, the Sunday Times reported that the reaction of Trump's daughter Ivanka to reports of a chemical attack in Idlib influenced the president’s decision to launch a missile attack on Syria.
Photos used:
US Navy
124 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. cniza
    cniza April 11 2017 12: 57
    +8
    So much has already been said on this subject, but we still don’t know the truth ... where did the 36 axes go? have evaporated? it doesn't happen that way.
    1. Baikonur
      Baikonur April 11 2017 13: 01
      +44
      And something I didn’t understand:
      Quote: Jabarov
      Russia will not use its weapons against American missiles to prevent them from falling onto Syrian territory.
      We can not be drawn into armed confrontation, it threatens a large-scale war,
      That is, like, we will only protect ourselves ??? !!! And if in Assad, then please, crap ??? !!!
      What a strange pose!
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 April 11 2017 13: 04
        +11
        Baikonur
        That is, like, we will only protect ourselves ??? !!! And if in Assad, then please, crap ??? !!! I don’t understand what a strange pose!
        hi We are not participants in the conflict between Assad and the USA! laughing lol laughing
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur April 11 2017 13: 10
          +21
          Hello, Sergey! Indeed, what kind of: "We if in Che - in thorny bushes!"
          Something is not just weak, but even somehow dangerous! Ameripedos can perceive and regard this as a guide to action! That Russia Assad will not protect. So you can start. Very suspicious statement!
          1. Observer2014
            Observer2014 April 11 2017 13: 16
            +18
            Baikonur
            Something is not just weak, but even somehow dangerous! Ameripedos can perceive and regard this as a guide to action! That Russia Assad will not protect. So you can start. Very suspicious statement!
            Duc is not only in Syria! And Donbass! Three-plus years! “They threw it and threw it off” so you understand all this? It turns out so. wassat We need justification. SCHAZ! Voila talk show, justify.
            1. Baikonur
              Baikonur April 11 2017 13: 20
              +3
              Yes ... (12 chairs !!!) Sadness ...
              1. Stas157
                Stas157 April 11 2017 13: 32
                +16
                . We can’t get involved in armed confrontation, it threatens a large-scale war,
                Coward position. Simple Voros. And why should we be afraid of this, not the Americans? They are attacking! Let them be afraid! .... Therefore they attack that they are absolutely sure that there will be no war! Russians prefer to sit out in the bushes. Introduce yourself as "we are not a party to the conflict."
                1. RussianRoulette
                  RussianRoulette April 11 2017 13: 47
                  +2
                  So, it would seem, what’s no reason to demonstrate their capabilities and missile defense systems? What would be a WOW-trump card in the sleeve could have been if all the flying axes had been dumbfounded. Another bazaar would be completely. They would later say that they flew to Tartus along the calculated trajectory. Radar of the Russian Federation, interestingly, record the launches of such missiles?
                  1. Stirbjorn
                    Stirbjorn April 11 2017 13: 57
                    +9
                    Quote: RussianRoulette
                    Radar of the Russian Federation, interestingly, record the launches of such missiles?

                    Of course they fix it, especially given the two-hour warning! So all these tales of Konoshenkov about lost axes are for patriots. After the next blow, they will also say that half didn’t reach, and supporters of cunning plans will start scribbling about “krauchi” ... but we must understand that from the outside it all looks like a kind of parallel reality, as with coverage of the war in Libya, when Gadaffi was overthrown - the capture of Tripoli in a studio on Qatari TV and the crowds of sweltering Tuaregs, to the aid of Sirtu wassat
                2. saturn.mmm
                  saturn.mmm April 11 2017 14: 41
                  0
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Introduce yourself as "we are not a party to the conflict."

                  You might think the US is a party to the conflict.
                  1. Stas157
                    Stas157 April 11 2017 16: 05
                    +6
                    Quote: saturn.mmm
                    You might think the US is a party to the conflict.

                    Since the United States is launching a missile strike against Syria, the United States and Syria are the parties to the conflict in this case. Russia pretends that this does not concern it at all. And our deputies directly said that Russia will not continue to intervene. In fact, they gave the green light to another shelling. And he will be! The Israelis bombed Syria again.
            2. Ivan Ivanov
              Ivan Ivanov April 11 2017 16: 19
              0
              Quote: Observer2014
              Duc is not only in Syria! And Donbass! More than three years

              These games "defend only ourselves" will logically end with the destruction of the army by long-range strikes. If on the topic of Donbass one could still dream of a cunning plan of expecting the collapse of Ukraine or the desire of Ukraine as a whole, then here .. hmm
        2. You Vlad
          You Vlad April 11 2017 13: 11
          +1
          Quote: Observer2014
          We are not participants in the conflict between Assad and the United States

          We are participants, but not directly, indirectly! That is, we won’t fight directly with the United States, such a war could end badly for the whole world! Push, push out, political games, weapons, advisers, intelligence data!
          1. Observer2014
            Observer2014 April 11 2017 13: 23
            +10
            You Vlad
            We are participants, but not directly, indirectly! That is, we won’t fight directly with the United States, such a war could end badly for the whole world! Push, push out, political games, weapons, advisers, intelligence data!
            It’s bad that you don’t understand what actions the United States allowed to think so. If the United States knew that any blow to the Syrians would be a blow to Russia, Ivanka wouldn’t listen to the snot. It’s the same in the Donbass. It’s all hell
            1. You Vlad
              You Vlad April 11 2017 13: 32
              +2
              Quote: Observer2014
              It’s bad that with their own incomprehensible actions that allowed the United States to think so. If the United States knew that any blow to the Syrians would be a blow to Russia

              This is the development of a conflict of interest, not all at once! Not only one country in the world can afford to do what we do in Syria against the USA, well, maybe China more! It will be further how many lives of its soldiers America will be ready to put in this I don’t have any doubts that ours will supply Syria with a modern air defense system. And then, as they say, bet gentlemen!
          2. DenZ
            DenZ April 11 2017 13: 41
            +7
            Quote: You Vlad
            We are participants, but not directly, indirectly!

            That is, Assad did not officially invite us to Syria? Maybe he invited the USA? Are we in Syria "indirectly"? !!!
            1. You Vlad
              You Vlad April 11 2017 13: 52
              +1
              Quote: DenZ
              That is, Assad did not officially invite us to Syria?

              He invited us to fight terrorism! We didn’t sign up for a direct conflict with the United States and we didn’t conclude any military alliances with Syria! And the fact that the United States allows themselves so they can afford it! We now have practically one pole of power, according to this international you can wipe yourself with the right! Understand that even the USSR could not afford to fight directly with the United States, indirectly yes, it allowed and fought!
              1. DenZ
                DenZ April 11 2017 14: 11
                +2
                Quote: You Vlad
                Understand that even the USSR could not afford to directly fight the United States, indirectly yes, allowed and fought

                What about the war in Korea? Do not remember? The only markings on the MiGs were Korean. Everything else is ours! And our people! Negotiations on the air in Russian.
                Quote: You Vlad
                We now actually have one pole of power, according to this, international law can wipe it!

                Well, if you think so then go to the USA. There you will write all nonsense at the pole. But you need to respond to arrogance and / or not to be wiped off by international law.
                Quote: You Vlad
                We did not subscribe to a direct conflict with the USA
                And have the Americans apparently already signed up for a conflict with us? Do you think so, and from here do you have a tantrum? I think that this is useless. It's too early for now.
                1. You Vlad
                  You Vlad April 11 2017 14: 31
                  0
                  Quote: DenZ
                  What about the war in Korea? Do not remember? The only markings on the MiGs were Korean. Everything else is ours! And our people! Negotiations on the air in Russian.

                  Do you consider this a direct military conflict? This is also help laughing
                  Quote: DenZ
                  Well, if you think so then go to the USA. There you will write all nonsense at the pole. But you need to respond to arrogance and / or not to be wiped off by international law.

                  This is not what I think, but the whole world repeat
                  Quote: DenZ
                  And have the Americans apparently already signed up for a conflict with us?

                  They shot at our bases? I didn’t know wassat
                  Quote: DenZ
                  Do you think so, and from here do you have a tantrum?

                  what What are you talking about?
                  1. DenZ
                    DenZ April 11 2017 15: 37
                    +2
                    Quote: You Vlad
                    Quote: DenZ You think so, and from here do you have a tantrum? What are you talking about?

                    I about it -
                    Quote: You Vlad
                    We did not subscribe to a direct conflict with the USA

                    Quote: You Vlad
                    Understand, even the USSR could not afford to directly fight the United States

                    You seem to have decided that we are subscribing to the war with the Americans. So I asked, did they really sign up for a war with us? (however, you answered this).
                    1. You Vlad
                      You Vlad April 11 2017 16: 00
                      0
                      There will be no direct conflict between Russia and the USA! Only a madman can do this.
                    2. You Vlad
                      You Vlad April 11 2017 16: 10
                      0
                      Quote: DenZ
                      You seem to have decided that we are subscribing to the war with the Americans.

                      An interesting move, I didn’t decide what, you wrote it
                      Quote: DenZ
                      That is, Assad did not officially invite us to Syria? Maybe he invited the USA? Are we in Syria "indirectly"? !!!

                      And I explained to you.
                      1. Ivan Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanov April 11 2017 16: 23
                        0
                        Quote: You Vlad
                        Only a madman can do this.

                        Only we can’t go for it .. the United States obviously has already gone
              2. Voldemar Voldemarovich Shelomov
                Voldemar Voldemarovich Shelomov April 11 2017 15: 37
                +3
                Quote: you Vlad
                Quote: DenZ
                That is, Assad did not officially invite us to Syria?

                He invited us to fight terrorism! We didn’t sign up for a direct conflict with the United States and we didn’t conclude any military alliances with Syria! And the fact that the United States allows themselves so they can afford it! We now have practically one pole of power, according to this international you can wipe yourself with the right! Understand that even the USSR could not afford to fight directly with the United States, indirectly yes, it allowed and fought!

                Why, they beat us in the face! Do not answer, lose credibility completely.
                1. You Vlad
                  You Vlad April 11 2017 16: 02
                  0
                  Quote: Voldemar Voldemarovich Shelomov
                  Why, they beat us in the face! Do not answer, lose credibility completely.

                  We will answer of course, but not in the way that hotheads scream!
                2. ultra
                  ultra April 12 2017 10: 58
                  0
                  Quote: Voldemar Voldemarovich Shelomov
                  Why, they beat us in the face

                  And often you get beaten? Contact the police. laughing
        3. lis-ik
          lis-ik April 11 2017 13: 13
          +13
          Quote: Observer2014
          Baikonur
          That is, like, we will only protect ourselves ??? !!! And if in Assad, then please, crap ??? !!! I don’t understand what a strange pose!
          hi We are not participants in the conflict between Assad and the USA! laughing lol laughing

          You know, and I, according to Vesti FM, from my previously respected Kulikov, I heard another excuse, more secure legally. They say we are fighting international terrorism. what we are entitled to, but the problems of CA are to us. It's rotten like that.
      2. dorz
        dorz April 11 2017 13: 04
        +1
        do not indulge in the emotions of the daughter of the president of the United States

        I wonder who he will listen to next time. And if his daughter recovers in a Chinese restaurant, then a nuclear war?
        1. jjj
          jjj April 11 2017 13: 14
          +5
          Quote: dorz
          And if his daughter

          The daughter adopted Judaism and supports international Zionist organizations
        2. Machete
          Machete April 11 2017 13: 30
          +7
          Trump's daughter:
          - Dad, Dad! He insulted me on Instagram! Bomb his country!

          Here is how it will be. )
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 11 2017 13: 11
        +18
        The pose is called - "Tightened tail", this pose is traced in our leadership since the summer of 2014.
        1. GRF
          GRF April 11 2017 14: 12
          0
          And before that, she was not? Or do not remember deeper?
          And at 41 they were not led to provocations, and with all their might, tail tightened to the last tried to avoid war.
          Were there any cowards?
          We were not and will not be, unlike perhaps you, provocateurs ...
          1. Ivan Ivanov
            Ivan Ivanov April 11 2017 16: 25
            0
            Only in contrast to 2014, there was active industrialization at 41, an obvious delay in understanding where the business was going, and now the privatizers are in power
      4. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn April 11 2017 13: 12
        +1
        Quote: Baikonur
        That is, like, we will only protect ourselves ??? !!! And if in Assad, then please, crap ??? !!!
        What a strange pose!

        So Ozerov in the same place clearly said yet
        "Our armed forces are in Syria to fight terrorism, and not to protect against external threats. We do not have such a mandate, and we will not intercept anything. But if the Syrian air defense engages in this, then they have every legal right to do this." - said Ozerov, answering the question whether Russia will intercept American missiles in the event of a new attack.
        http://www.interfax.ru/world/557830
      5. Vladimir 38
        Vladimir 38 April 11 2017 13: 13
        +17
        The fact of the matter is that this is the "pose" in which they put us and cheer on the patriots that they are all normal, we are cool. But in fact, we have come to fight terror and defend the legitimately elected government. But since we do not have the strength to defend legitimate authority, we will simply fight terror. You horseradish there on Assad, but don’t dare at our bases. That is the literal answer. It is sad. Actually, this was understandable after the Turks shot down our plane.
        1. Ivan Ivanov
          Ivan Ivanov April 11 2017 16: 28
          0
          In the case of the Turks, it was possible to give the figure to continue the game, the United States sweep away all the figures, what will we fight? Putin said: "The situation is similar to that of Iraq (???), we assume that new provocations are possible, this is unacceptable, we will contact international organizations to organize an international investigation." Those. act as extras?
      6. Waterfowl
        Waterfowl April 11 2017 13: 30
        +6
        What a strange pose! [/ Quote]
        The pose is cancer!)))) There will be no Assad, will our bases be in Syria?
      7. vanek77
        vanek77 April 11 2017 13: 46
        +9
        Exactly. And about our air defense. The S-400 target of the type of flying flying at an altitude of 100 m, will detect at a distance of 60 km, and if the flying missiles are flying at an altitude of 30 m. Against this, the antidote is AWACS with fighters and the darkness of the shell on the last frontier. In general, since the base was built, it is necessary to fulfill the obligation to protect the country's sky. Who then will contact us if today we wave our wings and declare a red line that cannot be crossed, but the next day, and we have nothing to do with it.
        1. jjj
          jjj April 11 2017 16: 01
          0
          In the case of launching missiles at us, we are obliged to destroy the launchers, in this case the adversary ships, and try to minimize the damage from attacking missiles
      8. GRF
        GRF April 11 2017 14: 07
        0
        Normal posture, now let them seek official recognition of the SGA as a terrorist organization, and then without problems with their elimination in Syria ...
      9. Geosun
        Geosun April 11 2017 14: 54
        0
        Do you know much about intergovernmental agreements at the time of the introduction of our contingent in Syria? Once, at a briefing, the military said that we had an agreement with NATO, they do not prevent us from deploying bases and their security in Syria, and we protect only our bases.
        In this context, everything becomes clear.
      10. Balferov
        Balferov April 11 2017 20: 37
        +1
        Quote: Baikonur
        What a strange pose!

        this pose is called "cancer"
    2. raid14
      raid14 April 11 2017 13: 04
      +8
      Was there a boy? Maybe the boy was never there! Where are the fragments of axes following the example of Yugoslavia, no, but you can write anything you want.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. jjj
      jjj April 11 2017 13: 11
      +6
      Quote: cniza
      So much has already been said on this subject, but we still don’t know the truth ... where did the 36 axes go? ,

      Goggles already, that the "Axes" were discovered in Dagestan with broken numbers
      1. lis-ik
        lis-ik April 11 2017 13: 56
        +2
        Quote: jjj
        Quote: cniza
        So much has already been said on this subject, but we still don’t know the truth ... where did the 36 axes go? ,

        Goggles already, that the "Axes" were discovered in Dagestan with broken numbers

        And now they "drift" around shopping centers.
    5. Asadullah
      Asadullah April 11 2017 13: 14
      0
      where did the 36 axes go? ,


      But really, where? Drowned in the sea, given the weather reports. Above the water they fly very low. IMHO.
    6. maxim947
      maxim947 April 11 2017 13: 26
      +1
      Legally, everything is correct. But unfortunately or fortunately, we are one of the few to comply with international acts, the rest have not spit on them for a long time. This is due to rather primitive - there are a lot of them, and we are alone ...
      "The majority is always for those who attract fools to their side."
      Martti Larni
      [i] [/ i]
    7. CONTROL
      CONTROL April 11 2017 13: 27
      +1
      Quote: cniza
      So much has already been said on this subject, but we still don’t know the truth ... where did the 36 axes go? have evaporated? it doesn't happen that way.

      Khan Sheikhun "covered" like 4 pieces. S-300 x 8 pcs., Missiles = 32 pcs .... flight time of the “Tomahawks” - 7-8 minutes ... Well, and the “beauty” is still ...
      "shell" - it seemed expensive, or what? ...
    8. jonhr
      jonhr April 11 2017 15: 34
      0
      35 just flew to the base of 36. this is confirmed by satellite photos
    9. gloomy fox
      gloomy fox April 11 2017 16: 47
      0
      as Ostap Bender said, Was there a Boy? The junk must have fallen somewhere in the sea.
    10. Slovak
      Slovak April 11 2017 18: 53
      0
      For some reason, one did not fly 20 km, the rest fell into the sea.
      1. jonhr
        jonhr April 11 2017 19: 21
        0
        or one was the jammer and it was he who self-destructed.
        I tend to believe that 58 flew for one simple reason. have a snapshot. but the fact that there were only 23 defeats of the picture is not
  2. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 April 11 2017 12: 58
    +1
    Of course you need to indicate your position that we will defend ourselves.
    1. Mar.Tirah
      Mar.Tirah April 11 2017 13: 00
      +3
      Well, thank you, at least one expressed his opinion, not being afraid to offend the Americans.
      1. saturn.mmm
        saturn.mmm April 11 2017 14: 54
        +1
        Quote: Mar. Tira
        Well, thank you, at least one expressed his opinion, not being afraid to offend the Americans.

        No, well, go nuts, but what can I say? Right now, the Americans will fire at the Russian base, and they will not shoot down rockets for fear of offending the Americans, some kind of insanity, it would be better if no one spoke out.
    2. cniza
      cniza April 11 2017 13: 00
      +3
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Of course you need to indicate your position that we will defend ourselves.


      In my opinion, it was designated initially, any attack on our bases is equivalent to an attack on Russia.
      1. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn April 11 2017 13: 15
        +13
        Quote: cniza
        In my opinion, it was designated initially, any attack on our bases is equivalent to an attack on Russia.

        so no one is going to bomb them - two bases, Tartus and Khmeimim. And Assad’s troops are scattered all over the country - it’s possible to bomb them, no one will object. Only immediately the question arises, after the SAA is in the trash, what resistance can they offer to the bearded men ?! But when the Islamists overthrew Assad, they will immediately begin to push us from these very bases! The same bearded men, heavily armed
      2. nik-karata
        nik-karata April 12 2017 10: 14
        0
        any attack on our bases is equivalent to an attack on Russia.

        An attack on the base of any country is equivalent to an attack on the state. Try to "calibrate" any staff base, wherever it is! hi
  3. Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 11 2017 13: 00
    +12
    Members of the "Council of the Federation" on the possible use of air defense in Syria
    I don’t know what emotions Ivanka or anyone else in America has. Or someone else hit the urine in the head. There was a blow. I want to ask the leadership of Russia. If you hit Russia, wake it up or watch it blow it or not?
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona April 11 2017 13: 23
      +15
      The Russian government does not intervene in the conflict between the United States and the people of the Russian Federation lol
      1. mig29mks
        mig29mks April 11 2017 19: 12
        +3
        The children of our government study and live there, but they cannot endanger their children !!!
    2. jonhr
      jonhr April 11 2017 15: 35
      +1
      urgently Ivanka Russian citizenship so that she corrected the situation laughing influenced so to speak
    3. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov April 11 2017 16: 38
      +2
      Quote: Observer2014
      The blow happened. I want to ask the leadership of Russia

      I agree. instead of cheap PR about how all of us are afraid, we need to mobilize the economy
    4. Balferov
      Balferov April 11 2017 20: 41
      0
      Quote: Observer2014
      I want to ask the leadership of Russia. You if there is a blow to Russia

      Well, write DAM, ask evo
  4. Uryukc
    Uryukc April 11 2017 13: 01
    +8
    No, we will not do that

    Humiliation ... humiliation again, I hope the position will change after an increase in the group, well, or at least we should painfully bomb off the "moderate" opposition.
    Earlier, the Sunday Times reported that the reaction of Trump's daughter Ivanka to reports of a chemical attack in Idlib influenced the president’s decision to launch a missile attack on Syria.

    Well, even if Ivanka does not approve of Assad, then how can one not strip the airfield in a sovereign state without declaring war. Although ... looks like information slops, for domestic consumption. This is not the first time, remember, "Trump is watching movies in an oval office, wearing a bathrobe."
  5. kolkulon
    kolkulon April 11 2017 13: 02
    0
    The daughter of a sheep and dad is a chaos.
    1. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm April 11 2017 15: 00
      0
      Quote: kolkulon
      The daughter of a sheep and dad is a chaos.

      The daughter is a Jew and her husband is a Jew, Assad is their enemy and Trump is their father and father-in-law, in short, a holiday in Israel.
    2. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 11 2017 15: 02
      0
      It seems that we do not have calibers falling into the windows, the stove still has Trump's high-rise.
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt April 11 2017 22: 55
        0
        Quote: cergey51046
        the stove is still worth Trump's skyscraper.

        Shooting at "Trump" and you can get to respectable people, our compatriots.
        in seven high-rise buildings of the Trump brand in Florida, at least 63 people bought property with Russian passports; the total value of the real estate they bought is at least 98,4 million dollars.
        Reuters correspondents received information on transactions from open sources, the Bureau Van Dijk Orbis database, interviews with apartment owners and realtors. Among homebuyers are people with extensive political connections. For example, the former top manager of the Federal agency Spetsstroy - a company that was building buildings for the Russian military and special services (the agency is currently in the process of liquidation).
        The other owner of the apartment is the president of the St. Petersburg investment bank, the third is the co-owner of a group specializing in development, investment and wholesale of electronics.
        Also among the buyers of luxury housing in the high-rises of Trump there are regional politicians and businessmen.
        However, no evidence of unlawful actions by President Trump, his real estate company, or his business partners was revealed; There are no representatives of the closest circle of President of Russia Putin among the owners of the apartments.http: //inosmi.ru/social/20170318/238903623.ht
        ml
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 11 2017 13: 03
    +2
    called on the White House to “cast aside ambition and not indulge in emotions on the Syrian issue”

    It’s time to understand that calling the White House for anything is useless. They live in a different world created by their imagination. There they are superheroes who once again save the world.
    1. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov April 11 2017 16: 39
      0
      What we are talking about, so there is a feeling that by and large we have nothing to answer. especially sad amid media fervor about coolness and independence
  7. bgt157.5
    bgt157.5 April 11 2017 13: 04
    +12
    Vladimir Dzhabarov said that Russia will not use its weapons against American missiles to prevent them from falling onto Syrian territory.

    Well, already at the official level, they are denying the defense of Syria. And how well it all began.
    With this approach to business, soon you can collect manat and go home.
    1. Taran 75
      Taran 75 April 11 2017 13: 11
      +2
      Yes, these are clowns, not the council of the federation - GDP will decide anyway
      1. cergey51046
        cergey51046 April 11 2017 15: 00
        +4
        The army of rams, under the leadership of a lion, will always defeat the army of lions, under the leadership of a ram.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 11 2017 13: 16
      +11
      We did not protect against Israeli raids and we will not protect the United States from missile and air strikes. Our well merged from responsibility. There is a Syrian "army" - let it protect.
      1. cergey51046
        cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 58
        +2
        Vile leadership, lives by the principle: "My hut from the edge ..."
      2. saturn.mmm
        saturn.mmm April 11 2017 15: 01
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        There is a Syrian "army" - let it protect.

        Let it protect, that’s true.
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 11 2017 13: 21
      +7
      Quote: bgt157.5
      With this approach to business, soon you can collect manat and go home.

      To Romania. yes
      1. bgt157.5
        bgt157.5 April 11 2017 13: 33
        +2
        And what about Romania?
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain April 11 2017 16: 27
          +8
          Quote: bgt157.5
          And what about Romania?

          And what does the manat have to do with it?
  8. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf April 11 2017 13: 08
    +21
    It means that we will defend our two bases, but they’ll bomb Syria and horseradish. Question: if we are not defending the country that has officially invited us to defend ourselves, what should we do and what can we call refusal to defend an ally as a betrayal? How many times will we betray, for the sake of "partners and colleagues"? This is the second question. And the third question. What do we get off this time? Do not offer tomatoes.
    1. zivXP
      zivXP April 11 2017 13: 15
      0
      Do not boil ahead of time. Nobody knows where these mismatched missiles fly - it means shooting down.
      1. cergey51046
        cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 56
        +1
        Destroy everything that violates the border of Syria. Kill all illegal armed groups.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 11 2017 13: 30
      +2
      We were invited to help in the fight against international terrorism and that’s all.
      1. cergey51046
        cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 54
        +2
        The USA is the main terrorist, the creator of terrorists and the main concealer. Fighting with the United States is the sacred cause of every resident of planet Earth.
    3. jonhr
      jonhr April 11 2017 15: 38
      +1
      and beef went to china laughing
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 11 2017 18: 16
        0
        Here, an option may appear - the supply of barbecue from Yong and his entourage to China. For a long time the “product” lay, and now everyone remembered about it.
  9. zivXP
    zivXP April 11 2017 13: 11
    0
    The message is clear. If the missiles are not the United States, they are shot down, that is, the Americans must coordinate their sudden missile attacks.
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev April 11 2017 13: 13
    +3
    Dad want elephants
    daughter is already 12 nights and everyone is sleeping and elephants are the same
    Well paaaapa want elephants! elephants! elephants!
    oh well, what can you do for your beloved daughter! Rota rise gas attack !!!
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL April 11 2017 13: 38
      +2
      2027 year.
      Trump wakes up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat. His wife asks:
      - Donald, what happened?
      - Honey, I had a nightmare. As if the next congress of the CPSU was going on, on the podium Putin said: “Dear comrades, we have heard reports on the situation in the Bryansk and Oryol regions.
      Now I would like to hear how things are in the Washington region. I give the floor to Comrade Trump, First Secretary of the Washington CPSU Regional Committee. ”
      And I sit and feel - well, I'm not ready! NOT READY!!!
      1. Balferov
        Balferov April 11 2017 20: 43
        0
        Quote: CONTROL
        2027 year.

        why is the year 2027?
  12. Pacifist
    Pacifist April 11 2017 13: 19
    +1
    What kind of political decisions are the president if they are influenced by a tearful, glamorous sheep? The question is of course rhetorical, but still. To be honest, the complete feeling is "patients run a psycho-hospital."
    1. jonhr
      jonhr April 11 2017 15: 41
      0
      although she is pale, she’s an adviser to the president laughing
      By the way, why protect? can be limited to stormy and prolonged applause in the council good
  13. Arzoo
    Arzoo April 11 2017 13: 36
    0
    We can respond with the supply of weapons to Iran and the DPRK.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 49
      0
      You can answer with Gauges in the window, or you want everything with the wrong hands.
  14. corporal
    corporal April 11 2017 13: 39
    +8
    And I, deb, voted for these eccentrics and the chief ?? am am

    It's a shame for my power (s)
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 47
      +3
      I completely agree with you, only I did not vote, it’s a bit old for this, but it’s a shame for the state, they betray and sell it.
    2. jonhr
      jonhr April 11 2017 15: 42
      +1
      why are you offended? you identified yourself drinks
  15. Roma 1977
    Roma 1977 April 11 2017 13: 41
    +6
    IM-PO-TEN-QI-I - it sounds much shorter, but does not lose the same meaning as in the statement.
  16. Flatter
    Flatter April 11 2017 13: 47
    +6
    Good statement. Now the American fleet can be located in the coastal zone and launch the Tomahawks swarms through Russian bases at the height of the hats of the Russian leadership.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 45
      +2
      The country of talkers. They spoil them, and they only tremble, it’s a shame for the state.
  17. 23424636
    23424636 April 11 2017 14: 05
    +2
    The daughter of the president of the United States, who accepted Judaism and has a husband, a Jew, Kouchner, becomes the most dangerous politician in the United States in protecting the interests of Israel. , who began indirectly the whole performance in Syria with the wrong hands in order to destroy the real enemy.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 44
      0
      It is necessary to coordinate the issue with Israel.
      1. Balferov
        Balferov April 11 2017 20: 45
        0
        Quote: cergey51046
        It is necessary to coordinate the issue with Israel.

        What is there to decide? a pair of "Topol" ...
        1. Pissarro
          Pissarro April 11 2017 21: 14
          0
          actually one Poplar. Even one is a lot
  18. Oleg7700
    Oleg7700 April 11 2017 14: 11
    +3
    http://www.interfax.ru/world/557830 "Сенатор Виктор Озеров заявил, что российская система ПВО не будет заниматься перехватом американских ракет..." Непонятно.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 42
      +3
      The raven will not peck out the crow. They are all one ointment. They have stolen capital and their children in the United States are held hostage. They dumb not to lick this ass.
  19. Buffet
    Buffet April 11 2017 14: 25
    0
    I don’t understand what kind of "hackiness" ??
  20. cergey51046
    cergey51046 April 11 2017 14: 40
    +1
    Normal would cover all of Syria. And if not one of the 60 missiles reached, then we could talk about the quality of our weapons.
  21. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 April 11 2017 14: 51
    0
    And what's the news?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 11 2017 15: 01
      +5
      The fact that ours gave the United States a complete go-ahead - bomb further, only do not fly into the area of ​​our bases.
      1. 31rus3
        31rus3 April 11 2017 17: 18
        +2
        Dear in 2014 here at VO, I wrote about the weakness in decision-making by our leadership (recognition of Poroshenko as the legitimate president of Ukraine), how did the patriots prove that they were right, here is another example of a “sound approach”, what should I say?
  22. samarin1969
    samarin1969 April 11 2017 17: 42
    0
    Quote: saturn.mmm
    Quote: Stas157
    Introduce yourself as "we are not a party to the conflict."

    You might think the US is a party to the conflict.

    Tabka, the south of Syria, the bombing around Deir Zor ... fly, shoot, bomb, cover ... than the US is not a "party to the conflict"?
  23. CooL_SnipeR
    CooL_SnipeR April 11 2017 20: 38
    +1
    Will Trump's cat / dog be ordered to strike North Korea?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 11 2017 21: 07
      0
      To hit North Korea, Trump needs from 2000 cruise missiles in the first salvo.
      1. CooL_SnipeR
        CooL_SnipeR April 11 2017 21: 51
        0
        One plus - we will have calibers, but they already have nothing
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 11 2017 23: 28
          0
          They have a lot of things, some tomahawks in the arsenal of 7, and add to them two thousand missiles AGM 158, 700 strategic missiles AGM 86C, 30000 gliding bombs AGM 154 with a range of 560 kilometers and millions of tons of adjustable and unguided bombs. So we won’t have any advantages.
  24. the same doctor
    the same doctor April 11 2017 22: 46
    0
    "... Russia reserves the right to ensure the security of the air base and logistics point in Tartus, no matter where the threats come from: from land, from air or from the sea ..." And the rest of Syria? And our other bases?
    .
    A century ago, it sounded like this: "Do not touch our Port Arthur, and we will not bother you in Korea."
  25. Radikal
    Radikal April 11 2017 23: 19
    0
    Quote: Baikonur
    And something I didn’t understand:
    Quote: Jabarov
    Russia will not use its weapons against American missiles to prevent them from falling onto Syrian territory.
    We can not be drawn into armed confrontation, it threatens a large-scale war,
    That is, like, we will only protect ourselves ??? !!! And if in Assad, then please, crap ??? !!!
    What a strange pose!

    This pose is called the "lower ground"! wassat
  26. Gavril
    Gavril April 12 2017 03: 38
    0
    Send in the US Arthur Pirozhkov to Ivanka for a special task or something
  27. The poor man
    The poor man April 12 2017 10: 11
    +1
    Why is Russia embarrassed? It is necessary to saturate Syria with our vaunted EW tools and turn them on at full power every time something flies over the territory of Syria without the permission of Russia, and not wait for someone to establish a no-fly zone there.
  28. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 April 12 2017 20: 31
    +1
    Quote: Baikonur
    Hello, Sergey! Indeed, what kind of: "We if in Che - in thorny bushes!"
    Something is not just weak, but even somehow dangerous! Ameripedos can perceive and regard this as a guide to action! That Russia Assad will not protect. So you can start. Very suspicious statement!

    Unfortunately, they have already begun, so our politicians, with their statements, are untying the hands of the victims, alas! angry
  29. den-protector
    den-protector April 12 2017 20: 38
    0
    Well, you can, of course, distance yourself from B. Assad, like, we're out of business. There is a good Russian proverb - a friend is in trouble. Russia already somehow in the 90s, 2000s, and also in 2011 already threw its allies and friends. We want everyone to turn away from us? Did we come to Syria solely to defend our bases?
  30. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 April 12 2017 20: 48
    0
    Quote: you Vlad
    Quote: Observer2014
    It’s bad that with their own incomprehensible actions that allowed the United States to think so. If the United States knew that any blow to the Syrians would be a blow to Russia

    This is the development of a conflict of interest, not all at once! Not only one country in the world can afford to do what we do in Syria against the USA, well, maybe China more! It will be further how many lives of its soldiers America will be ready to put in this I don’t have any doubts that ours will supply Syria with a modern air defense system. And then, as they say, bet gentlemen!

    But the Syrian air defense is not yet ready for such attacks, there are no trained units to work on modern air defense systems - they are still learning. And here our people are late, they are trying to present everything in a favorable light for themselves, and the Americans are not waiting for the Syrian air defense to be modernized and the rod now, so we need to connect our air defense volunteers if we want to have any real trump cards in the negotiations with the crazy Amer a salesman, not virtual! hi