Military Review

UN will not assess the eligibility of US strikes on Syria

77
The representative of the UN Secretary-General Stefan Dusarrik said that the UN Secretariat will not assess the legality of the actions of the United States that launched rocket attacks on the Syrian air base on the night of April 7 without the approval of the Security Council of the world organization. TASS.



We will not go into the question of whether it is legal or not. This is our position, said Dujarrik,
without explaining what caused such a decision.

According to him, neither the alleged chimataka in Syria, nor the US retaliation did not affect the UN position regarding the political settlement of the situation and the fate of Bashar al-Assad.

Our position has not changed. It consists in continuing the political dialogue in Geneva. As we said before, the future of Syria must be determined by the Syrian people themselves,
said the representative of the secretary general.

Commenting on the statements of the United States Permanent Representative to the UN Nikki Haley that "it is impossible to achieve peace in Syria while Bashar Assad is in power," Dujarrik stressed that this issue should be resolved within the framework of the Geneva talks.

One of the issues on the agenda (negotiations) is the process of transferring power. It is very important that the future leadership of Syria be chosen by the Syrian people themselves, as we said from the very beginning of the crisis. We call on all parties to devote themselves once again to the Geneva process and the political negotiations that are taking place in Geneva,
he noted.
Photos used:
http://www.translarium.info
77 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech
    Same lech April 11 2017 09: 06
    +14
    Julie UN ... am
    1. cniza
      cniza April 11 2017 09: 13
      +30
      Keepers of the USA.
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter April 11 2017 09: 16
        +11
        Victor, hi! hi drinks
        Quote: cniza
        Keepers of the USA.

        You very softly called them. I understand that moderators will not miss a strong word. wink
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur April 11 2017 09: 19
          +9
          Criminals! After all, such (not the first time!) Actions (INACTIONS) are direct protection of the crime !!! am
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter April 11 2017 09: 27
            +14
            Quote: Baikonur
            Criminals! After all, such (not the first time!) Actions (INACTIONS) are direct protection of the crime !!! am

            Eugene hi The fact that the UN has turned into a puppet theater of the absurd is the merit of Matrasia. However, the UN people are far from alone in this - a lot of examples. And this makes us look with hatred at all the stupid partners of mattresses who swallow joyfully all the dirt and filth from the fucking shit-democratizers. am
            1. 210ox
              210ox April 11 2017 09: 29
              +3
              Pasha, hello! Nobody expected anything else from them .. From deaf-deaf-mute people.
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              Quote: Baikonur
              Criminals! After all, such (not the first time!) Actions (INACTIONS) are direct protection of the crime !!! am

              Eugene hi The fact that the UN has turned into a puppet theater of the absurd is the merit of Matrasia. However, the UN people are far from alone in this - a lot of examples. And this makes us look with hatred at all the stupid partners of mattresses who swallow joyfully all the dirt and filth from the fucking shit-democratizers. am
              1. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter April 11 2017 09: 34
                +5
                Hi Dima! hi And what can you expect from a ventriloquist doll? fool
          2. Umka1367
            Umka1367 April 11 2017 10: 40
            +1
            The UN has outlived itself, as at one time the League of Nations!
            1. AUL
              AUL April 11 2017 11: 58
              0
              So the question arises, what do we do in this puppet UN? Veto impose resolutions? So the Yankees impose an organ on these resolutions, do what they need! Only in vain do we spend on contributions.
          3. DMB_95
            DMB_95 April 11 2017 10: 44
            +7
            Quote: Baikonur
            ... After all, such actions (INACTIVITY) - direct protection of the crime !!! am

            This UN response to US aggression is freeing everyone else's hands. And in the first place. A precedent for an invasion without evidence is established.
        2. cniza
          cniza April 11 2017 09: 34
          +5
          I welcome Pasha, but they don’t deserve our emotions, forgive me ... more honestly, they do not hide their lowered social responsibility, and these cheeks are puffed ...
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter April 11 2017 09: 40
            +5
            Quote: cniza
            sorry ... more honestly, they do not hide their reduced social responsibility

            Here I agree. Recently I read the revelations of a Russian oligarch. So he bluntly stated that all the confusion of the world in the rubble is not suitable for Russian priestesses of love! Zapadlyansky simply stupidly work out in well-known places what is paid for. And with Russian you can also talk heart to heart! wink
        3. The black
          The black April 11 2017 09: 43
          +8
          The UN as an international organization has long discredited itself and has become obsolete. It has become a structure that acts in the interests of the United States and its accomplices. It’s time to disperse these parasites
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter April 11 2017 09: 46
            +9
            Quote: Black
            It’s time to disperse these parasites

            Vyacheslav hi It had to be done for a long time! Why the hell do you need such a "wedding general"?
            1. Victor N
              Victor N April 11 2017 10: 05
              +1
              While there is no power to disperse, but it is necessary to act.
        4. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Olgovich
        Olgovich April 11 2017 09: 40
        +4
        Quote: cniza
        Keepers of the USA.

        Yeah ... "Our position is not to have a position!" Top hypocrisy and cynicism ....
    2. Skubudu
      Skubudu April 11 2017 09: 45
      +7
      In the "one polar world" the existence of the UN is meaningless.
      You are either under the United States or you are North Korea.
    3. Victor N
      Victor N April 11 2017 10: 03
      +3
      They hide their heads in the sand - when there is no other way.
      But this does not add credibility to the UN. Most countries are intimidated and not independent. The system of international law has been seriously destroyed in order to please lawlessness. What to do? And just screaming at the top of it, including dishonoring unprincipled.
    4. Juborg
      Juborg April 11 2017 11: 27
      +1
      This is not a crook, it is a pocket American organization, completely subordinate to them.
    5. skrabplus.ru
      skrabplus.ru April 11 2017 14: 42
      0
      no one doubted!
  2. vkl.47
    vkl.47 April 11 2017 09: 06
    +2
    Spineless animal
  3. Kent0001
    Kent0001 April 11 2017 09: 07
    +5
    The UN has completely outlived itself. They have long licked the amers.
  4. Curt
    Curt April 11 2017 09: 07
    +5
    Who the UN keeps him and dances ..
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 April 11 2017 09: 14
      +8
      Quote: Curt
      Who the UN keeps him and dances ..


      Ahem ... WE (Russia) - also contain it ... Only a joint dance does not "dance" ...
      Most of the countries containing the UN, instead of assistance from it, receive only plumes ...
      PS In case they do not support US policy ...
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null April 11 2017 09: 19
        +3
        Quote: weksha50
        WE (Russia) - also contain it

        - again:
        1. Crucian
          Crucian April 11 2017 09: 33
          +1
          50,746% of the contributions of enemies and their vassals ... Is there something shining for us there? Maybe not be a member of such an organization? No.
        2. weksha50
          weksha50 April 11 2017 10: 05
          0
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          Quote: weksha50
          WE (Russia) - also contain it
          - again:



          Ahem ... in my phrase, the keyword was "also" ...
          Well, and the fact that the UN “dance” first of all the rich payers is clear stump ...
          Only now the meaning of the real existence of this organization has long been in radical contradiction with its Charter and the goals of creation ...
          For Russia, the UN is like a suitcase without a handle ... It’s hard to carry, and it’s a pity to drop it (more precisely, it’s impossible to do it, otherwise we’ll find ourselves behind the fence) ...
          Similarly, things are with all PACE_OBSE ...
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null April 11 2017 10: 16
            +3
            Quote: weksha50
            For Russia, the UN is like a suitcase without a handle ... It’s hard to carry, and it’s a pity to drop it (more precisely, it’s impossible to do it, otherwise we’ll find ourselves behind the fence) ...

            - Is the veto right in the Security Council a “suitcase without a handle”? belay
            - hmmm ... what
            1. sharp-lad
              sharp-lad April 11 2017 20: 41
              0
              And what's the use of the veto right now? Sashiki did not give a damn about the “international law” developed and imposed by them and strike wherever and whenever they want.
        3. weksha50
          weksha50 April 11 2017 10: 11
          0
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          - again:


          Well, a little more specific:

          "The UN budget is formed by contributions from 193 member states. The size is determined based on the country's solvency, GDP and per capita income. The size of one country cannot (and should not) exceed 22% of the total budget.
          The United States pays the most - in the next 2 years, the United States will contribute 22% of $ 5.4 billion.
          In the next places by the size of contributions - Japan (9.7%), China (7.9%), France (4.9%), Great Britain (4.5%).
          Russia contributes an amount equal to 3% of the UN budget "...

          3% - also not sickly ...

          Do not forget that Trump will cut spending on the UN by 2 times ... "the Trump administration intends to direct all funds released in this way to increase the volume of financing of the defense sector" ...

          "The UN is already sounding the alarm about such decisions of Washington, saying that the contributions of other states" will not be enough to cover the decline in funding "...

          That's something like ...
          Source on TopVar: https://topwar.ru/110935-tramp-urezaet-vznosy-vo
          on-i-finansirovanie-gosdepa-i-usaid.html
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null April 11 2017 10: 19
            +3
            Quote: weksha50
            Do not forget that Trump cuts spending on the UN by 2 times ...

            - a marvelous move to increase the loyalty of a funded organization, don’t you? wink

            Quote: weksha50
            3% - also not sickly

            - 3% is “about nothing”, sorry request
          2. Ren
            Ren April 11 2017 10: 48
            +4
            Quote: weksha50
            Russia contributes an amount equal to 3% of the UN budget "...

            By contributing 3%, thanks to our fathers and grandfathers, we have the opportunity to block the Security Council’s decision there and they always at least listen to the voice of Russia ...
            And did anyone especially hear something about Japan, France, Great Britain, Canada, Italy, Spain, Brazil?
            1. Ren
              Ren April 11 2017 10: 49
              0
              Sponsors (financial appendages) - no more ...
  5. Altona
    Altona April 11 2017 09: 08
    +5
    One of the issues on the agenda (negotiations) is the process of transferring power. It is very important that the future leadership of Syria be chosen by the Syrian people themselves, as we said from the very beginning of the crisis. We call on all parties to devote themselves once again to the Geneva process and the political negotiations that are taking place in Geneva,
    -------------------------
    It is very important that the "Syrian people" chose the American puppet. If you translate this thesis into a normal language.
  6. _Vlad_
    _Vlad_ April 11 2017 09: 10
    +2
    this organization already looks like a roof ... then there are a lot of obscene language and obscene language, well, you understand me hi
  7. weksha50
    weksha50 April 11 2017 09: 12
    +12
    "the UN secretariat will not evaluate the legitimacy of US actions that launched rocket attacks on the Syrian air base on the night of April 7 without the approval of the World Security Council"...

    Fool ... Openly declare that the UN is not competent to condemn US aggression against an independent state ... It is the United States ...
    But to talk about the need for a change of power in Syria ... Is the UN AUTHORIZED?
    I have long said that the UN - within the framework of its Charter, within the framework of the goals for which it was created - has outlived itself from the word "completely" ...
    US Department of State ...
  8. jovanni
    jovanni April 11 2017 09: 14
    +4
    We will not go into the question of whether it is legal or not. This is our position, said Dujarrik,
    without explaining what caused such a decision.

    In Russian, this position is called "cancer" ...
  9. saniajan
    saniajan April 11 2017 09: 17
    +2
    ssstsykuny lousy, for them the boss is beyond jurisdiction, but they climb into other countries for any reason and without.
  10. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 11 2017 09: 17
    +2
    "Dead" position. So what to do? The United States unfastens the content of the UN most of all! Who will bite the nursing hand?
  11. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch April 11 2017 09: 18
    +2
    Translated from Dujarik - who else to rob, if not Syria? Maybe we dozuharikami, throw a bone. And we will suck her in the United with all zeal. But is this UN needed at all? A bunch of parasites. I remember there was such a League of Nations in the late 30s. Well, it did, but it did.
  12. Pacifist
    Pacifist April 11 2017 09: 20
    +1
    No words ... # lyadsky position.
    And wording
    ".. As we said before, the Syrian people themselves should determine the future of Syria ... One of the issues on the agenda (of negotiations) is the process of transferring power."

    Akin to Ford's saying, “You can choose a car of any color if it's black.”
    If the future of Syria should be decided by the Syrian people, then it is not their canine affair, whether or not there will be a transfer of power there, they will figure it out.
  13. bald
    bald April 11 2017 09: 24
    +5
    The UN is a long time ago the likeness of a corrupt girl and her accomplice Geneva. How many empty bazaars can be, plus Minsk, Astana and various ceasefires.
  14. zivXP
    zivXP April 11 2017 09: 30
    +3
    It is clear that the UN does not want to lose the feeding trough.
  15. CYBERNINJA
    CYBERNINJA April 11 2017 09: 30
    +1
    Today they will not discuss, but tomorrow ... Everything can be ...
  16. Machete
    Machete April 11 2017 09: 34
    +6
    It's time to close this sharagu.
  17. teron
    teron April 11 2017 09: 34
    +1
    Different groups of the Syrian people clung to each other's throats and there was no question of any elections there.
  18. Tolstoevsky
    Tolstoevsky April 11 2017 09: 42
    +3
    The United States Department of the United States Department of State was not created for this
  19. JD1979
    JD1979 April 11 2017 09: 56
    0
    Forgive the secretariat.
  20. AlexTires
    AlexTires April 11 2017 10: 00
    +2
    Someone doubted that the UN is embroiled? smile
  21. Topotun
    Topotun April 11 2017 10: 07
    +2
    Who would doubt .... It seems that this mechanism has long ceased to perform at least some functions. Well, except for those that pay the states ...
  22. Shadow of darkness
    Shadow of darkness April 11 2017 10: 18
    +5
    The UN has eliminated itself. There is no opinion, no influence, not an organization but a solid company for the procurement of horns and hooves. Circus on the imitation of international law.
  23. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 11 2017 10: 25
    +1
    We will not delve into the question of whether it is legal or not. This is our position.

    This is not the first time the UN has resolved itself when it comes to unauthorized actions by the United States. We do not need such a UN. Either dissolve (anyway, in recent years, no sense whatsoever), or at worst transfer the headquarters to a neutral state.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null April 11 2017 10: 31
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      We do not need such a UN. Either dissolve (anyway, in recent years, no sense whatsoever), or at worst transfer the headquarters to a neutral state

      - "It would be nice, it would be nice for us to catch a walrus large" (c)
      - I remind you - the share of the Russian Federation in financing (financing, Karl !!!) of the UN is 3%. Is there anything else to say?
      - By the way, you’ll transfer the UN headquarters to the Moon even, the financing situation will not change. This is a hint, yes wink
  24. Berkut24
    Berkut24 April 11 2017 10: 28
    0
    Since the UN simply refuses to fulfill its core functions, it is time to create a new organization. At one time, before the 2nd World League of Nations, she also began to engage in prostitution. Even the USSR was expelled from it. How it ended is known. Moreover, if the United States officially stated that the UN exists only to advance their interests.
  25. Sergey956
    Sergey956 April 11 2017 10: 28
    0
    Being in the owner’s house, the owner is not criticized. The UN headquarters is still located in the United States. What could be the criticism?
  26. PValery53
    PValery53 April 11 2017 10: 29
    0
    Political prostitution at the UN is booming. At the UN headquarters in New York "published" rates for the use of their "services"? - Rub-thing (darling), two - a bunch, not more expensive.
  27. david_aaron
    david_aaron April 11 2017 10: 35
    0
    stsikanuli against the wind
  28. Alekseits
    Alekseits April 11 2017 10: 37
    +1
    My hut is on the edge.
    Why then are they needed at all?
    Nasty ...
  29. NordUral
    NordUral April 11 2017 10: 41
    0
    Artiodactyl.
  30. Serg81
    Serg81 April 11 2017 10: 42
    0
    We will not delve into the question of whether it is legal or not. This is our position, said Dujarric.
    Then the question arises: what for you are needed ??? In Crimea, it means they delved into the question, but here they do not want to. And if tomorrow one country also wants to strike at another country that is destroying its citizens, will the UN go deeper into this issue or call for the implementation of the m agreements ????
  31. zloybond
    zloybond April 11 2017 10: 44
    0
    The US has attacked a sovereign state. US forces are in Syria illegally. THIS All you need to know and say.
  32. syndicalist
    syndicalist April 11 2017 10: 52
    0
    Quote: Cat Man Null
    is the veto in the Security Council a “suitcase without a handle”? belay
    - hmmm ...

    And how did it help us with the case of the American bombing?
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null April 11 2017 11: 08
      +1
      Quote: syndicalist
      Quote: Cat Man Null
      is the veto in the Security Council a “suitcase without a handle”? belay
      - hmmm ...

      And how did it help us with the case of the American bombing?

      - no way. So what? There were, and there will be more cases when it helped.
      - You’re not asking for a “cure for everything” at a nearby pharmacy, I hope?
      - Well, here is the UN Security Council, it is also not a "pill for immortality."

      Is it intelligible?
  33. Rostislav
    Rostislav April 11 2017 11: 08
    0
    Well, why is this a bunch of clowns?
    Faster than Russia, it is necessary to gain strength. None of the other presumptuous "exceptional" will stop.
  34. prior
    prior April 11 2017 11: 15
    0
    During the time after the collapse of the USSR, the USA managed to bend Europe, some other countries of the world, as well as a larger number of international organizations.
    Neither the UN, nor the European Union, nor NATO can object to the owner.
    Is it any wonder what they say, what they do and what all these bullshitters write about Russia?
    As before, the only allies of Russia are and will be - the Army and the Navy!
  35. AVGUST
    AVGUST April 11 2017 11: 27
    +2
    He is currently just a deliberative organ of the planet, but the fact that they don’t want to discuss this issue goes against their goals and objectives, you just can’t imagine how many times I saw the decisions of our courts that were either directly contrary to the law, or distorted its meaning to the exact opposite, so I think that it’s unlikely that we can get rid of this rostrum, but we need to take some measures to discredit this institute, which the DEVICE directly puts, on questions and topics inconvenient to it ....
  36. nikola
    nikola April 11 2017 11: 33
    0
    UN has turned the organization "no one"
  37. cergey51046
    cergey51046 April 11 2017 12: 04
    0
    OCCUPIERS do not have provocative support.
  38. pvv113
    pvv113 April 11 2017 12: 12
    +1
    We will not delve into the question of whether it is legal or not. This is our position.

    There are no words ... What kind of UN is this if it does not even have its own opinion?
    1. Born in the USSR
      Born in the USSR April 11 2017 14: 55
      0
      They are afraid that the United States will turn off the light and water in the building! How then to wash off the poop?
  39. sergej30003
    sergej30003 April 11 2017 12: 25
    0
    probably representatives of the UN believe that after the killing and change of Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein, and after the overthrow of Assad in Syria, there will be the same prosperity as in these countries
  40. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m April 11 2017 12: 32
    +1
    The association has surfaced.
    UN - USA.
    State Duma - Medvedev.
    the UN secretariat will not evaluate the legitimacy of the US actions, which launched rocket attacks on the Syrian air base on the night of April 7 without the approval of the World Security Council, TASS reports.
    This is from the article.
    State Duma deputies refused to support the proposal of the Communist Party representatives to request law enforcement information to verify the investigation of the Anti-Corruption Fund (FBK) Alexei Navalny about Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, reports TASS.
    This is from Gazeta.Ru
    A big request to administrators to remove garbage comments, which are very pretty here. Maybe it’s worth again to return the cons.
  41. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 April 11 2017 13: 17
    0
    And what is stopping Russia from destroying the Khokhloe equipment shooting at Donbass?
  42. SPIKER
    SPIKER April 11 2017 13: 22
    +1
    "un" - a stinky swamp !!!
  43. Born in the USSR
    Born in the USSR April 11 2017 14: 51
    +1
    “What is permitted to Jupiter is not allowed to the bull” - they live like that. Finished creatures! Vladimirovich, Viktorovich and Kozhugetovich, God grant you the wisdom of patience and perseverance!
  44. grigorich1966
    grigorich1966 April 11 2017 19: 09
    0
    Crap, girls!
  45. Vitalson
    Vitalson April 12 2017 13: 09
    0
    Because the chairman of the United Nations, I'm sorry ..... but finished, like 90% of his apparatus.