Military Review

Lavrov statement on the US strike on Syria

154
The head of the ministry of defense of Britain, Michael Fallon, made a statement on the subject of today's massive strike with US cruise missiles at an airfield in the province of Homs. According to Fallon, “the strike was carefully planned in such a way as to exclude the presence of victims and injured among the Russians.” At the same time, Fallon noted that he supports the American "proportional response according to the forces of Assad."

At the same time, the Minister of Defense of Britain, speaking as a kind of remote press secretary of the Pentagon, announced that in launching a missile attack on the Syrian military base in Homs, "there is no need to perceive the beginning of a new American military operation." In other words, Fallon wants to say that the American missile strike is “isolated”, moreover, it was carried out as part of an ongoing US military operation in Syria?

Meanwhile, the US missile attack on Syria was commented by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The head of Russian diplomacy compared rocket attacks on Syrian territory to the beginning of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.

RIA News cites the statement of the Russian Foreign Minister:
It recalls the situation of the year 2003, when the United States, Great Britain and some of its allies invaded Iraq, without the consent of the Security Council, in the flagrant violation of international law.


Lavrov statement on the US strike on Syria


Today it is generally difficult to recall when the United States and its allies for the last time in the international arena acted in full accordance with international law.

Sergei Lavrov:
If you wonder who benefits from what happened, it is beneficial only to those who want to undermine the Geneva, Astana process and want to create the necessary evidence, pretexts, reasons for moving from a political settlement to a regime change by force


According to the Russian foreign minister, the US attack on Syria is an act of aggression under a false pretext.
Photos used:
Russian Foreign Ministry website
154 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The black
    The black April 7 2017 12: 10
    +15
    Well, yes ... even the pretext is the same ... after eleven years they again say that they were mistaken.
    1. Alex_1973
      Alex_1973 April 7 2017 12: 14
      +9
      Black Today, 12:10 am New
      Well, yes ... even the same pretext
      They decided that since the international community is doing something that’s pushing mattresses for them, then why reinvent the wheel? We went along the beaten track, only now, as it were, this time the disease would not stumble ...
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur April 7 2017 12: 22
        +9
        These are trumpets! Like to show that he is also cool. And even cooler than Obama. And cooler than Caliber! We must also show him that he steers everything. And only he has everything under control.
        I think that it will not happen again (at least in the near future and not so menacingly). It is still unknown how his reputation inside will change! Perhaps he was specially “pushed” by his own people and framed. Impeachment now makes sense.
        And then another trampont can lead him to the emergency room! wassat
        1. _Vladislav_
          _Vladislav_ April 7 2017 12: 33
          +32
          The point is, Syria seems to be our Ally. American missiles arrived (which no one intercepted for some reason) bombed the base of our Ally. And we expressed deep concern winked
          And what is especially touching, the comments of some "patriots": Well, they didn’t shoot at the VKS! This is the Syrian base, let them have a headache! We shouldn't have! Syria is not our ally, it is Belarus Ally!
          And yesterday, these same people claimed that - "Here it’s just like a little snooping around, TIP RIP for Syria! Hooray!". In short, farts were torn yesterday for Syria, and today farts are torn for proving that "We shouldn’t have prevented this) Anyway, what are we, we don’t answer for Syria winked And in general it’s not a fail - it’s too much "
          I can’t rzhu, patstalom laughing It's funny to watch such comments. winked
          1. cniza
            cniza April 7 2017 12: 58
            +3
            Quote: Black
            Well, yes ... even the pretext is the same ... after eleven years they again say that they were mistaken.


            They say ... but this time they will be the answer is disproportionate and unexpected.
          2. Lace
            Lace April 7 2017 12: 59
            +7
            It’s good that people who are responsible for Russia's foreign policy and its security, first of all, calculate, and then make decisions, and do not laugh before the farts break.
          3. GSPDJGneva
            GSPDJGneva April 7 2017 13: 09
            +11
            Quote: _Vladislav_
            And yesterday, these same people claimed that - "Here it’s just like a little snooping around, TIP RIP for Syria! Hooray!". In short, farts were torn yesterday for Syria, and today farts are torn for proving that "We shouldn’t have prevented this) Anyway, what are we, we don’t answer for Syria winked And in general it’s not a fail - it’s too much "

            I agree funny)) At topwar there are few adequate people left. I’ve gotten one "moderator"
            But the appearance of our own psaki is no longer ice
            1. Shurik70
              Shurik70 April 7 2017 19: 54
              +1
              A 2013 article on the United States’s plans to carry out a chemical attack in Syria and blame Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on the British daily’s Daily Mail website was deleted.
              The published correspondence, which was stolen by a Malaysian hacker through a Britam Defense server, contains a correspondence between two dignitaries in a British-based contractor company Britam Defense, which says that the "Washington-approved" scheme suggests that Qatar will finance the use of chemical weapons by rebel forces in Syria. "

              Source:
              https://rg.ru/2017/04/07/daily-mail-udalila-stati
              uo-planah-ssha-organizovat-himataku-v-sirii.html

              QED
          4. Sanichsan
            Sanichsan April 7 2017 13: 17
            +4
            Quote: _Vladislav_
            And just yesterday, these same people claimed that - "just like a little someone snoops around, TIP Tear for Syria! Hooray!

            who are these same people? you?
          5. AID.S
            AID.S April 7 2017 13: 24
            +4
            Quote: _Vladislav_
            American missiles arrived (which no one intercepted for some reason)

            It seems that there are reports that not all missiles reached the target. Almost half. The reasons are not called.
            So it’s better to wait than to wave polymers from your shoulder ...
          6. KAV
            KAV April 7 2017 15: 45
            +7
            Vladislav,
            For example, I, somehow, was not used to pulling out slogans like yours in the first rows. And you, apparently, only come here for this. What, in real life, no one wants to listen to your cries "all lost"?
            In general, I would be very pleased to look at you at the beginning of a full-blown mess. Of course, you would scream with tarzan-style screams to meet the enemy with a leg from a stool with your hand and beat off cruise missiles flying at you!
            This is not the first topic in which you write the same thing in the same style.
            Are you generally busy with anything other than writing texts in the comments? By work, for example?
          7. peta locksmith
            peta locksmith April 7 2017 19: 57
            +1
            exactly, just solid laughter
            suddenly it turns out (http://warfiles.ru/show-148767-skrytay
            a-ugroza-pochemu-rossiya-ne-zaschitila-siriyu-ot-
            raketnogo-udara.html) that something 400 there cannot intercept tomahawks
            S-400, according to the technical description "is intended to destroy almost all modern and promising means of aerospace attack." - that is, almost everyone except the tomahawks ... class !!!

            verification of the effectiveness of action with 400 in Syria took place - effect -0
          8. not main
            not main April 7 2017 20: 53
            +1
            Quote: _Vladislav_
            The point is, Syria seems to be our Ally. American missiles arrived (which no one intercepted for some reason) bombed the base of our Ally. And we expressed deep concern winked
            And what is especially touching, the comments of some "patriots": Well, they didn’t shoot at the VKS! This is the Syrian base, let them have a headache! We shouldn't have! Syria is not our ally, it is Belarus Ally!
            And yesterday, these same people claimed that - "Here it’s just like a little snooping around, TIP RIP for Syria! Hooray!". In short, farts were torn yesterday for Syria, and today farts are torn for proving that "We shouldn’t have prevented this) Anyway, what are we, we don’t answer for Syria winked And in general it’s not a fail - it’s too much "
            I can’t rzhu, patstalom laughing It's funny to watch such comments. winked

            What do you want? Direct clash with the USA? Well, it's disgusting to read such pearls!
    2. elmi
      elmi April 7 2017 12: 23
      +20
      To the Americans, our protests are like a balm for the soul, what we want is what we do, and Russian convictions serve as a good advertisement for the power of America. Regrettably, now we are in the role of the Pug, and America in the role of the elephant (Krylova-Elephant Fable and Pug) But when in the USSR we were in the role of the elephant, just like America, however.
      1. Bath
        Bath April 7 2017 12: 26
        +4
        Ah young man))) the eagle then our Lavrov could have kept silent one jester effect is the same but no I was not afraid of the adversary he cut the truth, the uterus is beautiful, we’ll live right now
      2. Xnumx vis
        Xnumx vis April 7 2017 12: 33
        +12
        Fifty nine tomahawks with a pair of ships! And we have 8 pieces on Admiral Grigorovich ... Who else wants to say that Russia does not need the Ocean Fleet? Good deeds must be supported by strong hands! And not in a talkative language.
        1. Xnumx vis
          Xnumx vis April 7 2017 20: 29
          +1
          Yes . ., but do not you think the respected VO website that racket or tomahawks, our electronic warfare machines took aside ..? 36 pieces were taken into obscurity ... Or is this my fix idea?
          1. Aldefots
            Aldefots April 8 2017 14: 26
            0
            Since they are called the Tomahawk, could it not be returned to where they came from?
            1. andj61
              andj61 April 8 2017 14: 32
              +1
              Quote: Aldefots
              Since they are called the Tomahawk, could it not be returned to where they came from?

              Tomahawks, unfortunately do not come back ... request
              Now, if they were called Boomerangs - then it would be possible! bully hi
    3. svp67
      svp67 April 7 2017 12: 23
      +3
      Quote: Black
      Well, yes ... even the pretext is the same ... after eleven years they again say that they were mistaken.

      And there will be someone to explain something, with such an easy approach to the use of force ...
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 April 7 2017 12: 42
        +5
        Today it is generally difficult to recall when the United States and its allies for the last time in the international arena acted in full accordance with international law.
        It seems that we should not be allies ... but how good it once began.
        1. ltc22A
          ltc22A April 9 2017 20: 55
          0
          God deliver from such allies.
  2. Lester7777
    Lester7777 April 7 2017 12: 13
    +21
    A very difficult situation. Not to give the harshest answer to the actions of the United States, and each of our partners will think about whether Russia is such a reliable ally. The answer is a direct and clear threat of confrontation with the States.
    1. D-Master
      D-Master April 7 2017 12: 15
      +11
      WE are already in a state of cold war. We answered and will answer more than once. Thank God Time EBN and Kozyreva passed ....
    2. red joni
      red joni April 7 2017 12: 17
      +12
      Do we have allies?
      1. Nasrat
        Nasrat April 7 2017 12: 20
        +7
        Quote: red joni
        Do we have allies?


        Army and Navy - I hope they do not turn away from us !!!

        The USA taught a lesson to China. They said they were more accommodating ... And where else can the United States shoot without punishment, but informationally effective ??? Syria!
        1. 97110
          97110 April 7 2017 12: 44
          +3
          Quote: Nasr
          The USA taught a lesson to China.

          Or an insult. How will X accept the fact of a gift for a meeting with Trump? He essentially played in the dark. Or leave, like Primakov, or shut up, swallow. In vain Donald is so with the PRC, oh, in vain. Everyone is trying to pay for the lessons taught - it is so customary in this world.
          1. AID.S
            AID.S April 7 2017 13: 27
            +4
            Quote: 97110
            How will X accept the fact of a gift for a meeting with Trump?

            Already invited with a return visit ...
      2. BATUHAN
        BATUHAN April 7 2017 12: 22
        +16
        We have "allies" about 150 million. Is it not enough? How much can you recall some allies outside the borders of our State?
        One should live one's own life and be guided only by one's own interests.

        Ukraine was settled by non-Russians. Belarus rushes about in search of a historical past without Russians. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Turkmens, Tajiks, Uzbeks - a hundred years ago the territories where these "centuries-old peoples" live were called TURKESTAN.

        We need to live ourselves.
        1. Ivan Ivanov
          Ivan Ivanov April 7 2017 15: 42
          +2
          Quote: BATUHAN
          We need to live ourselves.

          Ideally, you need to judge people who destroyed the union, drove the Russian Federation to the borders of the 17th century, creating a time bomb of economic and political problems
      3. Lester7777
        Lester7777 April 7 2017 12: 23
        +2
        Besides the army and navy? Armenia, for example, in relation to which Baku, if not for Russia, would have acted much more impudently.
        1. AID.S
          AID.S April 7 2017 13: 50
          +1
          Quote: Lester7777
          Besides the army and navy? Armenia

          Erroneous opinion, pro-Western pan-and-headed ones will win there and everything will be like in Georgia, they will ask us from there and the balance of sympathies of the Russian Federation will automatically shift to Baku ..
          Until we were kicked out of Georgia, we chewed on snot and did not recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent ...
      4. elmi
        elmi April 7 2017 12: 33
        +7
        Quote: red joni
        Do we have allies?

        With such a policy, when both our Israelis and Americans are smashing our allies with impunity, we run the risk of being left without allies, in fact we do not have them. And those that are, as it were, in fact they are not there, they are so kind as to receive free money from us. Did they support us in Syria? Let them actually help, otherwise break the fictitious contract
        Alexander 3 said - “In the whole world we have only two faithful allies - our army and navy. Everyone else, at the earliest opportunity, will gang themselves up against us. ”
        1. Ivan Ivanov
          Ivan Ivanov April 7 2017 15: 51
          +3
          Quote: elmi
          With such a policy, when our allies and Israelis and Americans are smashed with impunity

          100% with such allies and partners is not necessary. There is no strength to beat openly - get ready, with the understanding that the military scenario is most likely, from here build the economy and domestic policy (information, ideological, law enforcement, etc.)
          1. elmi
            elmi April 7 2017 16: 01
            +4
            Yeah, we got involved with Syria ... but what to do? if you didn’t protect her, NATO would have long leveled Syria and set up a pro-Western government that they liked. Accordingly, gas pipelines didn’t go according to our scenario, etc. In response to the bombings, we need to defiantly sell EW assets, powerful air defense missiles, tori, s-300, combat aircraft, coastal bastions. Expensive, but aggressors for the future will know that in response to the bombing of our allies, they will receive powerful air defense. Here the question of the prestige of our country is we capable of protecting our allies or only capable of verbally condemning aggression
            1. Ivan Ivanov
              Ivan Ivanov April 7 2017 16: 27
              +3
              I agree. Expand air defense, if there is something to deploy, close the sky, warn the American and Israeli partners, in case of violation - shoot down without hesitation. It's scary / there is nothing to answer - to mobilize the economy, run 20 years in 5, otherwise they will carry the person across the table. running between the drops and the seat on two priests will only complicate the situation, in my opinion.
    3. zivXP
      zivXP April 7 2017 12: 19
      +1
      I agree. I don’t know what to do in such a situation, but I think there are bright heads.
    4. SSR
      SSR April 7 2017 12: 24
      +1
      Quote: Lester7777
      A very difficult situation. Not to give the harshest answer to the actions of the United States, and each of our partners will think about whether Russia is such a reliable ally. The answer is a direct and clear threat of confrontation with the States.

      In fact, many will wonder who needs such a schizophrenic hegemon?
      They say that half of the Tomahawks did not reach.
      I, as a complete ignoramus, think that Russia should move tactical nuclear weapons to Syria.
      1. Nasrat
        Nasrat April 7 2017 12: 27
        +2
        Quote: SSR

        They say that half of the Tomahawks did not reach.
        I, as a complete ignoramus, think that Russia should move tactical nuclear weapons to Syria.


        I think everyone flew where it was supposed to ... that is. intentionally into "milk" .... And why in Syria nuclear weapons? All these events - Xi’s Visit to the USA, Trump’s Statements about North Korea and China, 59 rockets firing at “milk” are links of one chain .. Trump (USA) has one strong (economically strong) enemy in the form of China, from which the USA now they are indirectly dependent ..... Russia doesn’t have any relation to economic giants .......
        1. 210ox
          210ox April 7 2017 12: 34
          0
          Shooting in the "milk" ?? Destruction of the airfield is your fault?
          Quote: Nasr
          Quote: SSR

          They say that half of the Tomahawks did not reach.
          I, as a complete ignoramus, think that Russia should move tactical nuclear weapons to Syria.

          I think everyone flew where it was supposed to ... that is. intentionally into "milk" .... And why in Syria nuclear weapons? All these events - Xi’s Visit to the USA, Trump’s Statements about North Korea and China, 59 rockets firing at “milk” are links of one chain .. Trump (USA) has one strong (economically strong) enemy in the form of China, from which the USA now they are indirectly dependent ..... Russia doesn’t have any relation to economic giants .......
          1. Nasrat
            Nasrat April 7 2017 12: 38
            +3
            What kind of destruction is there ... frames show, there is not any kind of destruction there.
            well, not to shoot in the desert, to dishonor yourself ... Note 59 axes have arrived !!! and the result is zilch ...
            1. Topotun
              Topotun April 7 2017 12: 41
              0
              Even during the Tempest in desert, Americans recognized that the percentage of hits is very far from even 90 ....
              1. Gray brother
                Gray brother April 7 2017 12: 54
                +1
                Quote: Topotun
                Even during the Tempest in desert, Americans recognized that the percentage of hits is very far from even 90 ....

                There is unverified information that half of the “axes” are still searching for places of hits. The take-off is practically intact - this is the statement of the Moscow Defense Ministry, the remaining shelters were shown.
                And this with such a salvo!
            2. Toran
              Toran April 7 2017 12: 58
              0
              What “frames”? Confirmed - at least 15 aircraft were destroyed and the airfield was put into disrepair.
              1. Nasrat
                Nasrat April 7 2017 13: 02
                +3
                Yes google and find a video from the airfield - what are 15 aircraft? - You laugh ... You got divorced ... Do you think the United States warned Russia, but Syria did not recognize ??? wassat
                1. Toran
                  Toran April 7 2017 18: 26
                  +1
                  You excuse me - believe Konashenkov :))) If anyone breeds, then it is he who has his own audience. I somehow more faith in international news agencies.
                  1. AID.S
                    AID.S April 7 2017 20: 41
                    +1
                    Quote: Toran
                    .I somehow more faith in international news agencies

                    Do you believe in a test tube? Oh well....
              2. Gray brother
                Gray brother April 7 2017 13: 03
                +1
                Quote: Toran
                Confirmed - at least 15 aircraft were destroyed and the airfield was put into disrepair.

                9 aircraft, the strip is intact.
                1. Nasrat
                  Nasrat April 7 2017 13: 05
                  +2
                  At the taxiways they’ll close up in one day !!! It just jerked concrete ...
                  Interestingly, Syria, knowing about the strikes - left 9 flying planes in the parking lot? .. Not flying, maybe donor planes ..
                2. Toran
                  Toran April 7 2017 18: 29
                  +1
                  Information from Konashenkov? :))) I somehow believe more in news agencies like the Associated Press. 15 are destroyed, runways, taxiing and much more are very badly damaged.
                  1. Paranoid50
                    Paranoid50 April 7 2017 19: 35
                    +4
                    Quote: Toran
                    I somehow believe more in news agencies like the Associated Press.

                    Yes, someone would doubt ... yes
            3. Ivan Ivanov
              Ivan Ivanov April 7 2017 16: 01
              0
              Quote: Nasr
              What destruction is there ...

              It doesn’t matter how much, hit on an ally, on a far-fetched pretext, in our presence .. the Foreign Ministry’s explanation of "distract from the mosul" does not hold water. attention distracted fake chem. attack and campaign in the press, the blow is aggression and spitting at us, spitting is not the first (Israel. By the way, did you pay attention to the reaction of Netanyahu’s friend to the actions of Trump’s partner?) If there is no tough (symmetrical / asymmetric is not important) reaction about success foreign policy can no longer speak
        2. voronbel53
          voronbel53 April 7 2017 12: 49
          +1
          ... what milk ?, the airfield to smithereens, 10 aircraft, the entire infrastructure was destroyed, only the personnel managed to withdraw, but there were still victims, 7 people, not counting the wounded. Our team also managed to withdraw, but they did not defend the airfield, they did not use the S-300 and S-400. If the Americans want it, then in a very short time all the Syrian air forces can destroy, and this is the leading and main force against terrorists, and it is not known that the Americans will be limited to this single action ... Turks, in general, demand the introduction of a no-fly in Syria zone. One thing is clear, we must not allow a repeat of the Yugoslav crisis, remember what happened to Iraq and Libya ...
        3. fider
          fider April 8 2017 10: 19
          0
          Us Rat :: Israeli experts believe that 58 missiles reached their targets. They note high impact efficiency. As for the relatively small damage caused, it is explained by the fact that the missiles are equipped with relatively small warheads - 450 kg of explosive. http://www.vesty.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4946758,
          00.html
    5. Ursus
      Ursus April 7 2017 12: 36
      +2
      I do not presume to vang, but it seems to me that everything will be much more tactful, softer and more effective.
      For example, a complete embargo to the States and selective to some "partners". Such an asymmetric response to aggression and violation of International Law will sober up "hot" heads, because it will directly "hit the wallet." For example, in this case, almost the entire US flight program covered (Falcon 9 is still OH how far from the series! 2 successful attempts are a good trend, but this is not an industrial design. And not only engines. Their astronauts fly and are present in international crews). Yes, I agree, we will have to buy the iPhone through the “third” partner countries (it’s clear that it’s not free), but they will lose an impressive market (not only the iPhone is talked about). Whoever needs it will buy, of course, and the rest will be flooded with China, if not to establish its own production.

      It seems to me that there is still a whole list of diplomatic decisions. Do not bliss from the couch; wait and see. At the moment, there is little information, and it is contradictory.
  3. native Russian
    native Russian April 7 2017 12: 14
    +6
    at least: clean Donbass otvetku
  4. Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 7 2017 12: 15
    +7
    Lavrov compared the missile strike on Syria with the US invasion of Iraq
    Well, expect something radical from the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
  5. Lostcoast
    Lostcoast April 7 2017 12: 16
    +8
    The main thing is that for so many years U.S. terrorists haven’t been helped by weapons and medical aid in an invasion. And the U.S. special forces in Syria are not an invasion. And now the invasion. Well, yes. I have to talk something. I'm waiting for Solovyov’s popcorn and co. I'm tired of worrying. They let them get the money for it and get it out. Let's see ... I almost forgot
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother April 7 2017 12: 26
      +3
      Do you have feelings for him? laughing
      1. Lostcoast
        Lostcoast April 7 2017 12: 32
        +1
        Quote: Gray Brother
        Do you have feelings for him? laughing

        Are you jealous? In vain tongue
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother April 7 2017 12: 33
          +1
          Quote: LostCoast
          Are you jealous?

          Not on your nelly. stop
      2. Nasrat
        Nasrat April 7 2017 12: 33
        +3
        Quote: Gray Brother
        Do you have feelings for him? laughing


        Rather wet dream
  6. Demo
    Demo April 7 2017 12: 16
    +4
    In general, nothing is clear what is happening. Syria is our ally .. why didn’t they protect? ((
    1. L. A. A.
      L. A. A. April 7 2017 12: 23
      +4
      Why? Because Russia has few forces to oppose the United States.
  7. volodya
    volodya April 7 2017 12: 16
    +10
    In the US, it seems a lot of inferior!
  8. Ka-52
    Ka-52 April 7 2017 12: 17
    +1
    In response, just bring down a couple of planes and announce the closure of airspace for all "international siL" without a UN mandate.
    1. Lostcoast
      Lostcoast April 7 2017 12: 18
      +5
      Quote: Ka-52
      In response, just bring down a couple of planes and announce the closure of airspace for all "international siL" without a UN mandate.

      And what next will you tell me? How do you imagine this?
      1. L. A. A.
        L. A. A. April 7 2017 12: 50
        +2
        And then foreign money will suffer in offshore of our officials and children they can drive them away from prestigious foreign universities.
        1. Sammy
          Sammy April 7 2017 19: 37
          0
          Quote: L. A. A.
          And then foreign money will suffer in offshore of our officials and children they can drive them away from prestigious foreign universities.

          then they will lose the restraining factor, and, already, there will be nothing to hide behind, and this is fraught)
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 April 7 2017 12: 17
    +2
    Throw on the table the break of the INF Treaty! They really lost the brakes!
  11. victorrat
    victorrat April 7 2017 12: 17
    0
    Is it really impossible to sue the International Court of Justice for violating international law on the United States ???? Here Assad would have served !! When Yugoslavia was, Russia was very weak. And now Syria can be lawyers and help sue the Americans.
    1. balikov.vladim
      balikov.vladim April 7 2017 12: 32
      +3
      And nothing will change. Wed ... the United States wanted at all, is it not clear?
    2. 97110
      97110 April 7 2017 12: 54
      0
      Quote: victorrat
      Is it really impossible to sue the International Court of Justice

      Where is this? And who are the judges? Well, you can’t be so naive. It’s indecent even.
  12. Ustrushan
    Ustrushan April 7 2017 12: 17
    +2
    Who is stronger is right. The winner writes the story. Nothing has changed since a man took a stone in his hand .....
    Trump is simply trying to recapture the internal shaft in the United States and brazenly took the opportunity to show his strength to internal opponents.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket April 7 2017 12: 18
      +2
      US strike on Syria. Report by Eugene Poddubny from Shairat air base
      1. Moor
        Moor April 7 2017 12: 25
        +2
        Somehow not impressive. I thought after 50 missiles there is a complete apocalypse
        1. Skubudu
          Skubudu April 7 2017 12: 32
          +2
          Quote: Moor
          Somehow not impressive. I thought after 50 missiles there is a complete apocalypse

          Because they selectively shoot, this is Our media, so God forbid that it doesn’t get into the frame that what you don’t need to see the Russian citizen
          1. Moor
            Moor April 7 2017 12: 36
            +1
            Quote: Skubudu
            Because they selectively shoot, this is Our media

            And the strip is almost whole - is that something done in Photoshop? I repeat once again - 50 missiles (!!!!) There should have been nothing left there at all. Either missed, or shot by blanks, or ... not all flew (???)
            1. Skubudu
              Skubudu April 7 2017 12: 45
              +1
              Quote: Moor
              And the strip is almost whole - is that something done in Photoshop? I repeat once again - 50 missiles (!!!!) There should have been nothing left there at all. Either missed, or shot by blanks, or ... not all flew (???)

              Poddubny, it seems like he loves all kinds of specific shots like the drone’s chronicle, but here is some kind of cut .... fragments ...
              Lift the drone and take a general view ...
              1. Moor
                Moor April 7 2017 12: 53
                +1
                Quote: Skubudu
                here is some kind of slicing .... fragments ...

                You heard his comments: there is a fire, ammunition is torn. Perhaps he was simply not allowed into some areas of the base. Well, and the drone ... Let's wait, I think a little later there will be a drone. Nobody denies that there are no losses at all: 9 planes, 4 killed, wounded. But (I repeat again) - 50 rockets there should have been plowed all. Maybe the filling is somehow weak?
            2. Nehist
              Nehist April 7 2017 13: 22
              +1
              Where do you see the runway there? Taxiing to caponiers is not the runway itself.
              1. Moor
                Moor April 7 2017 13: 28
                +1
                taxiing in the first frames, and then GDP close-up
        2. Wedmak
          Wedmak April 7 2017 12: 33
          0
          So I, too, somehow was not impressed. Like 59 axes, everything and everyone should be there. And then there were some ... scratches on concrete and several burned planes. Was the game worth the candle?
        3. Nasrat
          Nasrat April 7 2017 12: 34
          +2
          Quote: Moor
          Somehow not impressive. I thought after 50 missiles there is a complete apocalypse


          This sham attack was, to intimidate Xi Jenping
          1. Voyager
            Voyager April 8 2017 10: 27
            0
            I must say they succeeded. C already wants dialogue
        4. padded jacket
          padded jacket April 7 2017 13: 14
          0
          Quote: Moor
          I thought after 50 missiles there is a complete apocalypse

          Not All Tomahawks Dividers lol
          Less than half of 59 US missiles reached Syrian air base in Homs
          Of the 59 US cruise missiles launched, less than half reached Syrian airbase Shairat. This was told by a military source in Damascus, Interfax reports his words.

          As the source said, last night the US Navy launched a massive missile attack on the Syrian airfield in Homs. According to him, a total of 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles were launched, but less than half reached the air base.
          http://newstes.ru/2017/04/07/do-siriyskoy-aviabaz
          yv-homse-doletelo-menshe-poloviny-iz-59-raket-ss
          ha.html
          1. Moor
            Moor April 7 2017 13: 17
            0
            Oh, so interesting! By the way, judging by the results, it seems to be true. But the reason to find out? Or are we still trained?
      2. fider
        fider April 8 2017 10: 25
        0
        He’s lying. http://www.vesty.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4946758,
        00.html
  13. native Russian
    native Russian April 7 2017 12: 18
    +8
    it is not so important that Lavrov, Putin, Shoigu, (Medvedev is not on the list) say. It is important that they do. There is no need to talk about what they will do. This should be seen. And you need to do, as a minimum, the following:
    - increase the minimum wage
    - reduce taxes to at least 30%
    - increase childcare benefits, etc.
    - give cheap loans to business
    - really support small business

    And shit about tomahawks, our brain is fucked up .... you don’t need to
    1. Squelcher
      Squelcher April 7 2017 12: 45
      0
      I pay 13% of income, why do you want to raise? Or are you the son of an officer?
    2. 97110
      97110 April 7 2017 13: 11
      +1
      Quote: native Russian
      And you need to do, as a minimum, the following:

      Well, you ... give !! In the country of CAPITALISM shockly built! And our bourgeoisie are contesting with everyone else their piece of the world pie. That is, everyone else is watching tightly so that ours is not squeezed out. And about your happy thoughts ... From time immemorial, external complications were for the hosts an occasion for the staff to cut the solder. That is: 1. Lower pensions and minimum wages.
      2. Make it difficult to get benefits.
      3. Raise taxes.
      4. Raise the price of a loan.
      5. Shit .. to the staff brains shit about axes and bring to the personnel the obvious fact that Trump and al-Bagadadi - one face, only painted.
      Then we will tear their staff to the British flag, and our bourgeois will receive a piece of world pie worthy of Great Russia. And your recommendations are aimed at undermining the national capitalist economy. Which then starve the army to starvation and Kalibrov will not give in accordance with state orders. What will we fight against evil enemies? What you are not truly Russian, if you call for the defeat of domestic owners of the means of production. Maybe you are from the Bolsheviks?
  14. ando_bor
    ando_bor April 7 2017 12: 18
    +2
    Russia suspends Syria incident prevention memorandum
    - Now Americans in Syria can be legally wet, - without warning.
  15. rasputin17
    rasputin17 April 7 2017 12: 19
    +3
    Old songs about the main thing and a monologue about anything under international law! sad
    For a long time we will chew snot and crush water in a mortar, relying on resolutions of chimeras such as the Soviet Union and the UN which have not put anything into anything for a long time!
  16. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 7 2017 12: 19
    +4
    The Foreign Ministry, of course, needs to be given an answer, and naturally at the level of diplomacy. And in parallel with our videoconferencing, it is also necessary to respond with attacks on the IS and the so-called "moderate". And so that they remember this day for life (who will remain alive).
  17. red joni
    red joni April 7 2017 12: 19
    0
    let America scoop up all the affairs in Syria, but we need to get out of there and I will vote for Putin anyway.
    1. native Russian
      native Russian April 7 2017 12: 23
      +1
      we don’t need to be felled from there in any case. We bombed 400 military factories there. You think for whom they were manufacturing products. Misconception: start a third world in Europe. Reality: start a war with us with the wrong hands
  18. Sanitary and epidemiological station
    0
    This must not be dismissed. A retaliatory strike is needed on the US sixes in Syria!
    1. GSPDJGneva
      GSPDJGneva April 7 2017 13: 12
      0
      Quote: Sanitary and epidemiological station
      This must not be dismissed. A retaliatory strike is needed on the US sixes in Syria!

      Yeah) right away a couple of thermonuclear ammunition)) And it’s on the sixes of the USA)))))))))))) There are times and there the Syrians
      1. Sanitary and epidemiological station
        0
        It doesn’t matter what nationality ISIL animals, although there are more than half of foreign mercenaries, as in Chechnya, at one time.
  19. red joni
    red joni April 7 2017 12: 21
    +2
    Assad is not our ally, he damn horn substitutes us a bastard.
  20. Operator
    Operator April 7 2017 12: 21
    +7
    Runway at Shairat Air Base Not Damaged - Trump наш man in washington


    It's time for all the prowlers to stick their tongues in the ass am
  21. To be or not to be
    To be or not to be April 7 2017 12: 21
    +1
    From the revelations of trump - businessman
    “The best thing is to take care of the lever of pressure on partners in advance, in other words, to let them know that you have what they want, or what they crave, and even better - something that they simply can’t do without . ”
    (Donald Trump The Art of Making Deals ")
    1. April 6, Chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China Xi Jinping, together with the government delegation, paid an official visit to Florida, where he will meet with US President Donald Trump.
    2. Successes of Russia in Syria
    3. On May 25, 2017, the NATO summit at the level of heads of state in Brussels. TRAMP is participating,
    1. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be April 7 2017 12: 26
      0
      More from the postulates of trump
      "Sometimes, in order to push through your deal, you have to go to cast a shadow of doubt on a competitor."
      "if you are a little tougher or a little more scandalous than others, if you are doing something daring, large-scale or dubious, the press will write about you with pleasure. I always do things a bit differently than others, I’m not afraid of non-trivial decisions, my goals always ambitious. "
  22. Mwg
    Mwg April 7 2017 12: 21
    +5
    I personally determined the essence of the US actions. They can say anything, but they will do what they intended. These are actions from a position of strength and only strength, and nothing else. Those who say - they don’t even need to say reasons, if only the air was full, and they would not answer for anything and would not answer. Until the US army lyuley rake out in an adult way in any region, the talkers will not calm down. Vietnam remember. The United States did not rock the boat long after that.
  23. Rabinowicz
    Rabinowicz April 7 2017 12: 22
    +1
    They warned in advance that they would hit.
    There was no such humanism from Assad or Hizbala during the shelling of Israel.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak April 7 2017 12: 38
      +5
      Assad without your Israel has a headache. It’s only your warriors who are sick on the head, without understanding, shower Assad’s troops with shells and missiles on any provocation.
  24. 34 region
    34 region April 7 2017 12: 22
    +1
    What international law? If the lion's share of UN funding belongs to the United States, then UN decisions will be made in favor of the United States. The USA pays the servant and the servant will be against the lord? All international law is a fiction. In Soviet times, international law was ensured by the power of the USSR. This has been shown in both Korea and Vietnam. Then even as it respected international law. Today, the US is devouring countries and regions one by one. There is no one to confront the United States today. Even China is silent in a rag. It’s not clear what’s going on in Syria. It feels like the United States and we are sharing Syria and jointly destroying the Syrians. What did the US demonstrate by launching rockets? Were they disposed of, checked our air defense systems, conducted an operation in favor of ISIS (supported by fire)?
  25. Lelek
    Lelek April 7 2017 12: 22
    +2
    (In other words, Fallon wants to say that the American missile strike is "single", and it was carried out as part of an ongoing US military operation in Syria?)

    Those. in other words, the demonstration of muscles and the simultaneous support of "their son of a bitch" from Daesh. It fits into the credo of the "Anglo-Saxons".

    And here it would be quite logical for the Russian Federation to “close the Syrian sky” and to initiate in the UN the issue of an unauthorized missile strike by the United States on the territory of the sovereign state of Syria. yes
    1. 34 region
      34 region April 7 2017 12: 38
      +2
      12.22. Lovely! There, most likely, the war is not due to Syria, but because of business interests. Whoever controls that region will have goodies from him. The game goes on a long run. Control over the entire region (not only Syria) will mean a monopoly of its business in this territory. It will be both control over oil and gas production, and control of transport routes (especially if they build a network of canals from the Baltic to those countries where there is a war. And there are plans for building canals for a long time.). Why, then, the US does not fight directly as in Iraq? Why would they bear the cost of this? You can hire contractors (such as Saudis) who hire subcontractors (ISIS) and wait for the completion of the order. You can sometimes help your people. At the same time, to work out modern military tactics and test modern weapons. For the US, this war is one solid bun. Russia rests? They will try to break down with sanctions, terrorist attacks, a pen for spending on military needs, arrests of accounts and property ... hi
      1. Lelek
        Lelek April 7 2017 12: 50
        +1
        Quote: Region 34
        34 region


        I agree, Syria is a "transit hub" and the struggle here will be "weak?". From how smartly Russia behaves in it, its image in the entire BV region and in our southern underbelly will depend. We will fight, there is no alternative. In addition, the US strike on Syria activated the Bandera Nazis in \ on the Ruin, and we can expect their attack on LDNR at any hour. yes
  26. Cynic
    Cynic April 7 2017 12: 23
    +1
    War?! No, that’s how we, by chance for peaceful purposes, have killed and will continue to kill ...

    Not a stupid person said: they, because of the only tears of the child, are ready to burn the hospital!
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. Vladimir 38
    Vladimir 38 April 7 2017 12: 24
    +3
    Enough already about international law, not him. The US scored on him and only understand power. It is necessary to “hand over” modern weapons to the Syrians and sink their ships and shoot down planes. They only understand the power
  29. Oleg Severov
    Oleg Severov April 7 2017 12: 25
    +1
    Well, yes, the problem of making a decision. But Russia is an ally of Assad and is obliged to take measures to protect against aggression. Not all is limited to verbiage, so Russia itself will quickly lose credibility
  30. zivXP
    zivXP April 7 2017 12: 26
    +2
    Erdogan still throws - Turkey will support the United States in the event of a military operation in Syria
    https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2259954.html
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak April 7 2017 12: 41
      +1
      Of course it will. It’s more convenient to beat a weak enemy, exhausted by a long war, from behind Uncle SAM’s back.
    2. cost
      cost April 7 2017 12: 55
      +2
      here let him support. Erdogan today chose with whom he is. but we hope this defector is no longer interested
  31. Kgv Kgv
    Kgv Kgv April 7 2017 12: 29
    0
    so they’re wrong all their lives, but in general, Americans are one big ERROR OF NATURE
  32. ochakow703
    ochakow703 April 7 2017 12: 29
    +1
    The situation is like in Yugoslavia. Well, where is the U-turn over the Atlantic ... well, let’s get along more talkatively.
  33. maks007
    maks007 April 7 2017 12: 29
    0
    Quote: Observer2014
    Well, expect something radical from the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

    Russian Foreign Ministry: Russia suspends the Memorandum of Prevention of incidents in the SAR
    https://politexpert.net/33977-mid-rf-rossiya-prio
    stanavlivaet-deistvie-memoranduma-o-predotvrashch
    enii-incidentov-v-sar
    According to the TASS news agency, with reference to the statement of the Russian Foreign Ministry in Russia, it was decided to suspend the Memorandum, which regulated the prevention of aircraft destruction incidents as part of a military operation in the SAR. This international agreement was supposed to ensure the aviation safety of various countries.
    The basis for such a political decision was the recent act of unprecedented US aggression in Syria. Recall that America destroyed the Shairat airbase with 59 Tomahawk missiles. Not only military infrastructure was damaged, but the national interests of ordinary citizens were also damaged. It should be noted that earlier the Russian Foreign Ministry called on the UN Security Council to convene an emergency meeting to discuss the current situation.
    Author: Grigory Pavlodubov

    Or https://rueconomics.ru/238979-zaharova-rf-priosta
    novila-memorandum-s-ssha-o-predotvrashchenii-inci
    dentov-v-sirii
  34. P36M2
    P36M2 April 7 2017 12: 33
    0
    Quote: quilted jacket
    US strike on Syria. Report by Eugene Poddubny from Shairat air base

    And this is from 59 tomahawks ?? Pshyk, not the result.
  35. nomad62
    nomad62 April 7 2017 12: 33
    0
    everything goes according to the script with Iraq
    fake pretext and then annihilation of the objectionable regime
    when Assad is hanged, we will even more strongly condemn US policy and will urge us to think again and not do so anymore
    and x% can we still?
    we are a “superpower” only in the context of possessing a large nuclear arsenal, and we will NEVER use it
  36. Zubr
    Zubr April 7 2017 12: 34
    +1
    The “Safety Flight Memorandum” has been suspended by us. I think that after an ultimatum at the UN, ours will close the sky in Syria.
  37. Sergej1972
    Sergej1972 April 7 2017 12: 35
    0
    It amazes me that the results of the attack are very modest. Or are the Tomahawks not the same, or are rumors about the destructive power of cruise missiles in general (without nuclear weapons) greatly exaggerated?
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket April 7 2017 12: 39
      0
      Russia sent frigate Admiral Grigorovich to the shores of Syria
      In connection with the US missile strike at Shairat airbase in Syria, Russia sent frigate Admiral Grigorovich to the shores of the Middle East state.

      According to the Economy Today agency, the ship left the Black Sea and crossed the Bosphorus.

      Earlier, the Russian authorities called Washington’s actions an act of aggression committed on a far-fetched pretext.
      http://rusplt.ru/news/rossiya-napravila-fregat-65
      3300.html
    2. libertinia
      libertinia April 7 2017 20: 38
      0
      Well, everyone is stupid, no matter how many missiles flew or didn’t fly. It is important that the missiles flew past our military base and everything flew. The Americans checked the characteristics of our air defense systems, satellite monitoring systems for air and ground space also determined how the missile defense systems would work for us in Russia. Collected along the way this information in all frequency ranges, is it bad? At the same time, our generals were checked for lice. Notice that 60 missiles were fired, and could be up to 300. And such an attack on our military base could not be repelled, that's the point. This is a demonstration of the strength that we lack in case of confrontation in Syria There is a solution, there aren’t enough forces, it’s far away. But if Assad is put out of action, the question arises: what are we doing in Syria? If we shot down at least part of the missiles we had a trump card, we would protect the country's independence from enemies. now, wipe the spit and make a smart face. The cowardice of not making the right and terrible decision lies entirely with our Commander-in-Chief. That was Plan B.
  38. L10n77
    L10n77 April 7 2017 12: 38
    +1
    Well, once again they managed it. "If a country, choosing between war and shame, chooses shame, it receives both war and shame"
    © Winston Churchill.
  39. 3vs
    3vs April 7 2017 12: 40
    0
    Now, in essence, EW systems should be turned on to deflect missiles flying from the sea to the left, so that
    our cunning friends diagnosed their dome ...
  40. Fast_mutant
    Fast_mutant April 7 2017 12: 42
    +1
    I am only wondering why, there is no air defense at air bases?
    After all, it is clear that this is an object that will definitely be felled in the first place during an exacerbation with amers!
    And neither where, nor in the media, nor in the internet did I see the question: "WHERE IS THE AIR defense?".
    Why there are no messages like: "... K pieces were shot down from N missiles! ...".
    It seems that the Americans with axes can solve the tasks in Syria for us.
    Isn't it time to think FORWARD, and not POSTFACTUM?
    First, the Su-24 without fighter cover. Now the airbase without air defense, albeit the Syrian army. Or does everyone think that when fighting with the barmales, you can forget about the missiles and drones of the USA, Israel, Turkey and other "allies"? Now, as usual, are you boiling urgent events?
    As an option - ours were “in share” with partners, “political” or some other, for example, Assad S300 was in no hurry to take? Have you decided to hurry?
    In general, as there was a mess, it remained ... One cheers-patriotism on the topic "they - in shit, we - in chocolate"!
  41. Monarchist
    Monarchist April 7 2017 12: 44
    0
    Quote: red joni
    Do we have allies?

    His Imperial Majesty Alexander 3 said: "Russia has only two allies: the army and the photo, and the rest are afraid of our greatness"
    Now I remembered: on the eve of May 9, 1976, the political commander from the military enlistment office arrived and let us "rub our ears" for us: the tsar is so limited that he blurted out complete stupidity and other things, and we have true allies: in America, Cuba, Asia, Vietnam, half of Africa, half of Europe . And now, where are the "faithful allies"? Even if Raul Castro sent a revolution through the woods. Remember his meeting with the Baboon?
  42. Tony Montana
    Tony Montana April 7 2017 12: 45
    0
    All and not for the decisiveness of our authorities.
    Now, probably the terrorists will start the offensive as usual)
  43. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine April 7 2017 12: 46
    +1
    And when America abided by international laws - NEVER!
  44. rus-5819
    rus-5819 April 7 2017 12: 49
    +1
    It recalls the situation of the year 2003, when the United States, Great Britain and some of its allies invaded Iraq, without the consent of the Security Council, in the flagrant violation of international law.

    This once again proves that the US and NATO forces are acting according to patterns, they are "enraged" by the successes of Russia in Syria and in Aleppo in particular, and they are not able to offer anything cardinal and really effective, except for carpet bombing of civilians.
    And they do not care from the high bell tower to the international community and all rights. They behaved and behave like an elephant in a china shop, and this always gets away with it.
    Many here (including myself) pinned certain hopes on Trump coming to power as an adequate, pragmatic, loyal (in some matters) politician.
    One hundred days of trump ends, the battle for Mosul is practically lost (there is practically no city as such), which remains, only a distracting maneuver - humane bombardment of something:
    59 cruise missiles of $ 2 million each, and then nothing was killed, only five of what kind of Syrians were there.
    "Hawks" in Congress, the Senate and the Pentagon can applaud -Trump-cool man !!! Just what will taxpayers say to that? Will the rating of Donald Hitler rise in the eyes of the Americans? We will have a look.
  45. Monarchist
    Monarchist April 7 2017 12: 51
    0
    Quote: victorrat
    Is it really impossible to sue the International Court of Justice for violating international law on the United States ???? Here Assad would have served !! When Yugoslavia was, Russia was very weak. And now Syria can be lawyers and help sue the Americans.

    As the saying goes: "do not mix my footcloths": if even in the seventies mattresses put the "device" on the international court, and now!
    Remember how 200 years ago the people said: “Do not fight with the strong, but do not sue the rich!”
  46. Zulu_S
    Zulu_S April 7 2017 12: 55
    0
    Again they shook the tube, hit without calculating the consequences. After Iraq, ISIS appeared, but also twin towers in New York.
    What is after Syria?
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. maks007
    maks007 April 7 2017 13: 05
    0
    Quote: Fast_mutant
    I am only wondering why, there is no air defense at air bases?
    After all, it is clear that this is an object that will definitely be felled in the first place during an exacerbation with amers!
    And neither where, nor in the media, nor in the internet did I see the question: "WHERE IS THE AIR defense?".
    Why there are no messages like: "... K pieces were shot down from N missiles! ...".
    It seems that the Americans with axes can solve the tasks in Syria for us.
    Isn't it time to think FORWARD, and not POSTFACTUM?
    First, the Su-24 without fighter cover. Now the airbase without air defense, albeit the Syrian army. Or does everyone think that when fighting with the barmales, you can forget about the missiles and drones of the USA, Israel, Turkey and other "allies"? Now, as usual, are you boiling urgent events?
    As an option - ours were “in share” with partners, “political” or some other, for example, Assad S300 was in no hurry to take? Have you decided to hurry?
    In general, as there was a mess, it remained ... One cheers-patriotism on the topic "they - in shit, we - in chocolate"!

    Probably look bad or between the lines

    http://warfiles.ru/show-148673-tomagavki-v-dele-c
    hem-mozhet-answer-russia.html

    Again, you still haven’t figured out what our air defense systems are for and to protect whom.
    1. Fast_mutant
      Fast_mutant April 7 2017 14: 15
      0
      Quote: maks007
      Probably look bad or between the lines

      http://warfiles.ru/show-148673-tomagavki-v-dele-c
      hem-mozhet-answer-russia.html



      Thanks for the link. I missed, missed ...)) Between the lines I learned to read while still living in the USSR ...
      My thesis is confirmed that we in Syria are not at all “in chocolate”.
      I will explain my point of view.
      Even assuming the presence of 9M96M in ALL starting C400, it is 128 missiles. Nearly 60 missiles were struck at the Syrian airfield.
      According to our database, during a hypothetical strike, without hesitation they can smack up three times as much and four times (the Americans are also aware of 128 missiles) ... It will not cost them a dime ... Of course, there is our fleet, which never not numerous and will leave something for self-defense, which is right ...
      Thus, we "back to back" can only ensure our safety, and that is not 100% likely. Here comes the conclusion: in any case, we now cannot compare with amers in terms of the power of a strike-response. Therefore, in a quiet and "faded" from the air base after a warning.
      Yes, to understand the attitude of my position I will explain one more point ...
      I do not advocate covering all Syrian bases! They themselves must think about their aviation! You can’t buy a C300, buy a “Shell”!
      We ourselves are obliged to reliably cover! Hope to cover.
  49. Sovlat
    Sovlat April 7 2017 13: 07
    0
    Russia once again "worn out", showing the world the C400 in Syria. crying
    1. Fast_mutant
      Fast_mutant April 7 2017 14: 18
      0
      Thanks to the presence of our C400, they did not strike at us, but at the Syrians. Everything's Alright. C400 performs its task! Until.
      1. Istvan
        Istvan April 7 2017 18: 44
        +2
        As in the animated film "But he didn’t butcher us because we are a gang."
  50. hohryakov066
    hohryakov066 April 7 2017 13: 08
    +1
    Or maybe everything is simpler. Is it just that the party “Tomahawks” has expired and had to be disposed of?