Pentagon Railguns

75
Success in the global military-technical confrontation is ensured only by those countries where they profess a strategy of technological advancing of competitors. An indispensable condition for an effective response to the challenges of potential adversaries is the prompt introduction of breakthrough ideas as a key element of the defense scientific and technical reserve (NTZ) in creating promising and non-conventional weapons.

The level of defense research and related technologies has been and remains the most important factor determining the development of means of warfare in the long term. In this regard, it is of practical interest to analyze the innovation policy of the United States, aimed at implementing a new strategy for ensuring military superiority.



Strategic agility

In November, the Pentagon initiated a set of activities called the Defense Innovation Initiative (DII) to counter the growing threats to national security in the military sphere and ensure technological superiority in November. The main goal is to identify the unique ways, directions of advanced equipment of the US Armed Forces in the XXI century and the formation of a system of sustainable funding for research. DII involves a complex of works in six main areas.

The first is related to the formation of a plan of long-term research aimed at identifying promising areas for the creation of new types of weapons and military equipment, that is, new military technologies and effective methods for their use - the Long-Range Research and Development Plan (LRRDP). From December 2014 to August 2015, proposals were collected in such scientific and technological areas as space, underwater operations, strike operations and air superiority, air defense (AD) and missile defense (PRO), and some others. The first results of the examination of the information received are reflected in the draft budget of the US R & D for the 2017 fiscal year.

The second direction is devoted to the reform of the Reliance XXI system - a procedure for integrated (interspecific) planning of applied research (budget category R & D of the US Department of Defense - BA2) and technological developments (budget category - BA3) of the Pentagon. One of the results of the reforming of Reliance XXI was the selection of 17 areas (Communities of Interest), which are the overall planning of research and development programs of the US Department of Defense.

The third direction - “Ensuring global leadership in innovation for defense needs” involves promoting the development of the scientific community engaged in defense work, training qualified personnel for the planning, acquisition and management of the life cycle of weapons and military equipment, as well as stimulating the influx of young professionals. The complex of relevant activities in the formative stage.

Three other areas include the development of approaches to conducting exercises and command-staff training (war-gaming), reducing the testing time of innovative technologies, improving the art of war (tactics and strategies for the use of the US military taking into account technological innovations), identifying, adapting and implementing effective business -models in the planning, development and procurement of IWT (Innovative Business Practices). As part of the latter, the third and third program to improve the system of defense acquisitions, R & D and management of the life cycle of weapons and military equipment - Better Buying Power 3.0 was formed.

Pentagon RailgunsThe results of the activities of the US DOD on DII are reflected in the formation of a new (third) strategy to ensure the military superiority of the United States - the Third Offset Strategy. This refers to potential adversaries with modern means of countering (blocking) access to their own or controlled territories (Anti-access / Area Denial - A2 / AD). The A2 / AD is a complex of weapons, including high-precision weapon (WTO), defense systems (anti-space, anti-air, anti-missile, anti-ship and anti-submarine) and electronic warfare (EW). Absolute superiority is understood as the unconditional achievement of military success in all areas - space, air, on land and sea, in cyberspace.

According to military experts, previous US military superiority strategies were successfully implemented in the Cold War. The first was based on nuclear weapons and their means of delivery. The second is on the synergistic effect of the use of the WTO, information-intelligence systems, missile / defense systems and technologies for reducing the visibility of weapons and military equipment. It is believed that the first theoretical rationale for technology that provides military superiority, given by William Perry (William J. Perry) when he was the US Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Development. It should be noted that Offset strategies are based on providing the US with global technological leadership in the military-technical sphere and are a kind of invitation to eventual opponents to participate in the arms race.

According to the concept of the US military, the new strategy under the symbol “Quickness” should focus on the following tasks: large-scale and complex use of the capabilities of robotic complexes, operations using low-profile long-range aircraft, submarine warfare using autonomous complexes of heterogeneous technical means, design of weapons and military equipment with their accelerated integration into a single system.

Five areas of R&D have been identified: autonomous machines and systems capable of continuous self-learning; human-machine interaction technologies that provide effective decision support; new technical means to improve the efficiency of human activity; technologies for the interaction of groupings from crewed weapons and military equipment and robots; semi-autonomous weapon systems that operate effectively in conditions of large-scale use of electronic warfare by the enemy.

In the 2016 fiscal year, a one-year project started, aimed at accelerating the introduction of technologies that ensure the implementation of the new strategy of excellence (Defense Technology Offset), with the amount of funding 75 million dollars. The key areas of the project include directed energy weapons (high-power laser weapons and microwave weapons), hypersonic weapons and high-speed projectiles, cyberspace operations technology, autonomous complexes of diverse technical means intended for submarine warfare, big data analysis technologies (Big Data ).

Silicon Valley Residency

To support the measures envisaged by the DII, and to accelerate the processes of forming a scientific and technological foundation for the implementation of the third military superiority strategy, the United States Defense Department has formed new divisions: Defense Innovation Unit Experimental - DIUx, Strategic Capabilities Office) and the Defense Innovation Board (DIB).

DIUx was formed in 2015 year as a separate structural unit of the US military, based in Silicon Valley (Silicon Valley). Its main tasks are: strengthening ties with the scientific community and attracting new high-tech companies to participate in defense research and development projects; monitoring the performance of innovative companies located in Silicon Valley, and prompt identification of the prospects for the achievements obtained in the interests of the US Armed Forces; performance of representative functions of the US DoD in this area. George Duchak, who previously headed the Information Systems Directorate of the United States Air Force Research Laboratory (ARL), has been appointed head of the unit. Organizationally, DIUx enters the office of Assistant US Secretary of Defense for Research and Development.

DIUx is positioned as an innovation hub, designed to most fully realize the potential of high-tech companies to ensure US superiority in the military sphere. The expediency of finding this unit in Silicon Valley is due to the following. First, it is one of the three largest US technology centers (with centers in New York and Washington). From San Francisco to San Jose there are several thousand institutions (headquarters and representative offices of companies, development centers, etc.) engaged in world-class projects.

Secondly, the research and development ordering system created by the Pentagon did not allow to quickly identify innovative breakthroughs that are emerging in the main technological centers of the country. In this regard, it is noteworthy that in the summer of 2016, the DIUx representative office in Boston was opened (in the territory that received the conditional name Eastern Silicon Valley).

In 2015 – 2016 fiscal years, no budget allocations were made for commissioning work for the DIUx Experimental Division. But already in the cycle from 2017 to 2021, it is planned to annually allocate approximately 30 million dollars for applied research (work category BA2).

To introduce successful business practices, Pentagon will expand its cooperation with the venture capital company IQ-Tel. In the 2017 fiscal year, approximately 40 million dollars are allocated to finance its pilot program. Initially, the company created in 1999 on the initiative of the CIA was represented as an NPO. Now its main task is to serve the interests of the country's intelligence community in the development and implementation of advanced technologies (mainly information and computing) using a variety of mechanisms (approaches, principles, methods, models, etc.) of venture investment. IQ-Tel has proven itself to be a highly successful, high-profit organization implementing innovative public-private partnership projects in the field of national security.

In March 2016, the Defense Innovation Board (DIB) was formed in the office of the US Deputy Secretary of Defense for Technology, Armaments Acquisition and Logistics (USD AT&L), the main task of which is to find organizational mechanisms and best business practices. ensuring the effective development of the US Armed Forces based on technological innovation. In fact, there was transferred part of the functions of the Committee for the Study of Business Processes in the Interests of the US Defense Department (Defense Business Board - DBB), concerning the development of recommendations for improving the organization, planning and financing of R&D based on best commercial practices.

The Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) was formed in summer 2012. The main task is to accelerate the implementation of the scientific and technical groundwork of the US military department in breakthrough areas of AME development. SCO was officially presented as an institution ordering secret innovative developments. The office is in the organizational structure of the USD AT&L apparatus and is subordinate to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for R&D (ASD R&E). William Roper, who previously served as MDA chief designer for systems integration, has been appointed director of the new division. Since its inception, SCO has funded 15 R&D projects (project categories BA3 and BA4), focused on solving 23 priority tasks of AME development. The Pentagon leadership recognized the activity as successful. Therefore, it is planned to allocate almost $ 2017 million for the implementation of projects in the 902 financial year. About 36 percent of the total budget allocation is planned to go to support development for the US Navy.

When coyotes fly

The main activity of SCO is focused on three priority areas for creating prototype weapons and military equipment: upgrading existing products to solve new problems, integrating systems to enhance synergy, integrating commercially available technologies and innovative developments.

In the first area, SCO’s activities are focused on the following.

1. Participation in the development of an anti-ship supersonic missile with a range of more than 6 kilometers (maximum speed - approximately 174 M) based on the SM-370 SAM (RIM-3,7 ERAM, Raytheon). The test results of this variant of the SM-6 were recognized by the military authorities as successful. It is expected that this year will begin placement of the sample on warships.

2. Execution of works (on the Strike-Ex project) to create the Tomahawk anti-ship variant of the Kyrgyz Republic based on the TLAM Block IV E modification. The rocket in this version is capable of hitting mobile ground targets based on information received from the communications satellite and re-targeting (on-board re-planning flight task in flight) and send to the command post review photos.

3. The program of the next torpedo upgrade Mk 48 Mod 7AT (FMS). It is planned to create two versions of the APB-6 / TI-1 and APB-7 / TI-2 torpedoes Mk 48 of the new modification Mod 8.

4. Participation in the modernization of the operational-tactical missile system ATACMS with the unitary warhead (program for extending the ATACMS SLEP warranty period). Presumably, part of this work, like the Strike-Ex project, is focused on replacing the onboard electronics of the rocket, the control system, including the inertial navigation system and error correction tools, as well as updating the automation (including the explosion point maintenance system) warhead.

5. The project of the accelerated creation of prototypes based on the use of technology of ultrafast body throwing - Hypervelocity Gun Weapon System - HGWS (the former name of the project - Land-and-Sea-Based Powder Guns). Prior to 2022 years planned jointly with the orders the agencies Navy and the Army work on prototypes gun mounts firing subcaliber high-speed corrected projectiles (High Velocity Projectile - HVP) ship 127-mm Mk45 in versions Mod 2 (barrel length - 6858 mm) and Mod 4 ( barrel length - 7874 mm), naval 155-mm Mk51 AGS (Advanced Gun System), ACS M109A6 PIM and towed 155-mm howitzers M777A2. The project provides support for the development of an experimental model of a stationary ground-based complex with an electrodynamic system of hyper-speed projectile throwing of a HyperVP (HyperVelocity Projectile) rail type (Land-Based Rail Gun - LBRG). In the 2014 – 2015 financial years, the SCO Directorate funded preparations for conducting experimental studies of the LBRG complex, located on the territory of the Navy test center on Wallops Island (Virginia). The HGWS project is based on a scientific and technical background, formed during the implementation of an extensive complex of fundamental, applied research and development, focused on the development of ultra-high-speed body throwing technologies (projects HyperVP, EMRG, LBRG, etc.).

An example of system integration to enhance the synergistic effect is the SCO Sea Mob project, which is focused on increasing the autonomy of unmanned surface boats (BNK) and ensuring their group actions in anti-mine and anti-submarine defense. The base platform, apparently, was the BNK of the CUSV (Common USV) project, created under the program of purchasing target modules for LCS class ships. According to the statements of the Americans, the BUS CUSV autonomous navigation system will be able, with minimal operator involvement, to ensure navigation safety of the vessel (at speeds up to 25 – 30 nodes) in accordance with the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) . It is understood that collision risk assessment methods, control algorithms, which provide maneuvering methods for avoiding collisions and planning safe movement, comply with the requirements of COLREGS.

The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Payloads project can serve as an example of SCO's third priority activity - "Combining Commercially Available Technologies and Innovative Solutions". It is focused on finding "mature" technical solutions aimed at accelerating the implementation of the results of the Low-Cost UAV Swarming Technology (LOCUST) program. It, ordered by the US Navy ONS (Office Naval Research - ONR), provides for the development of technologies for performing combat missions by groups of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with a low cost of "life cycle". Under the LOCUST program, in particular, the technologies for the group synchronized launch of the UAVs of the Coyote project from containers and ensuring their interaction in flight were improved. One of the tasks being worked out for the grouping of such devices is the search, detection and tracking of moving targets (ground and sea), as well as the issuance of target designations for corrected ammunition or anti-ship missiles. The UAV of the Coyote project was developed by Advanced Ceramics Research (now renamed Sensitel and part of BAE Systems Corporation). Coyote belongs to the class of single-use abandoned vehicles and, due to its design (wings and rudders open in flight), it is launched from containers accepted for the supply of the US Armed Forces, for example, from a 127-mm TPK sonobuoy installed from an aircraft (Orion P3, P-8A Poseidon) or submarines. The device takes payload modules with a total weight of up to 2,2 kilograms. To detect submarines, a variant of equipping with a miniature magnetic anomaly detector has been worked out. The average cost of one Coyote UAV without a payload module does not exceed $15. Now BAE Systems (Sensitel) offers a version that provides the ability to reuse UAVs. It should be noted that Drones of this project were acquired by the command of the naval aviation U.S. Navy to test the use of robotic systems.

The American Defense Innovation Initiative focuses primarily on achieving qualitative changes in the technical equipment of the US Armed Forces in the coming years. The new structural divisions created in the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for R & D should speed up the processes of forming the NTR to realize the third strategy of American military superiority.

It can be said that the Pentagon’s innovation policy in the military-technical sphere is characterized as follows: “first revealed a new scientific direction (scientific idea)” - “first initiated research” - “first obtained results” - “first assessed the feasibility of implementing the obtained results during modernization existing and the creation of promising and unconventional models of weapons and military equipment ”.

This should initiate a response to improve the domestic scientific and technical reserve, which under no circumstances should become the “stepchild” of the state defense order. There is no shortage of new ideas in our country.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 9 2017 06: 55
    Participation in the development of an anti-ship supersonic missile with a range of more than 6 kilometers (maximum speed - about 174 M) based on the SM-370 SAM (RIM-3,7 ERAM, Raytheon company).


    Dangerous weapons capable of reaching our low-orbit satellites ...
    I hope in RUSSIA, too, there are surprises for the American satellite constellation ... it is no secret that many successes in aggression against other states of the United States owe precisely to satellites of various purposes.
  2. +9
    April 9 2017 07: 04
    US Defense Ministry DII Results Reflected in the Formation of a New (Third) US Military Superiority Strategy

    The Yankos has a STRATEGY spelled out, adequate and with a long-term perspective. They understand where to strive and know where to invest. And if we discard all political tinsel, then these are grandiose plans.

    Is our "strategy" an asymmetric response? Like, we don’t take part in the arms race, but your technology is a blunt cut of a boble))) This is not a strategy, but a tactic. Or is everything so classified with us?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +7
      April 9 2017 08: 53
      Quote: MainBeam
      Is our "strategy" an asymmetric response? Like, we don’t take part in the arms race, but your technology is a blunt cut of a boble))) This is not a strategy, but a tactic. Or is everything so classified with us?

      But why...
      There is clearly a priority in the development of electronic warfare systems, air defense systems, primarily ground-based systems. Finally, they began testing sound-thermal complexes for detecting shooting guns and mortars ...
      This is all just an asymmetric answer. Like missile defense systems.

      Quote: MainBeam
      The Yankos has a STRATEGY spelled out, adequate and with a long-term perspective.

      The funny thing is that they always have strategies spelled out adequately. Moreover, they always invest a lot of money. Problems begin when it is necessary to supply the developed troops. Funny pros from lobbying offices in Washington begin to work, and the army receives not what it needs, but what will bring the greatest income to the military-industrial complex
      1. 0
        April 9 2017 10: 50
        You are absolutely right that what you wish is often taken for the reality. I can say for sure that in order to set electronic warfare equipment to a new qualitative level, it is necessary to solve the fundamental problems of physics. In particular, it is necessary to generate a new perturbation impulse in a completely new way, so that later through wave processes it can be transmitted in space. And for me it is quite obvious that this is not done for the simple reason of the lack of relevant inventions and discoveries. Although Tesla already stated and it is clear on what basis, how and how to generate a qualitatively different impulse in its ability to spread effectively in space
        1. 0
          April 9 2017 11: 11
          Quote: gridasov
          To set electronic warfare equipment to a new qualitative level, it is necessary to solve the fundamental problems of physics. In particular, it is necessary to generate a new perturbation impulse in a completely new way, so that later through wave processes it can be transmitted in space.

          The main problem of RE suppression is the vulnerability of jamming transmitters. Yes, they are trying to solve it, for example, with REP artillery ammunition, installing sources on UAVs, but this still does not solve the problem.
          1. +1
            April 9 2017 11: 53
            Where to apply this is understandable. Only there are no solutions in the primary link of the process. There is no scientific justification or technical solution in the possibility of substantiating the physical process of transmitting a disturbance impulse and transmitting it to a distance. Therefore, returning to Tesla we can clearly state in which direction his research was and what it came to. And believe the questions, it’s completely not in the power parameters of the corresponding pulse generators. The question is a whole complex of coordinated decisions on the perturbation of a pulse and its directed wave motion. And without these fundamental decisions, all the announced achievements are a bluff.
        2. +1
          April 10 2017 09: 33
          a qualitative leap can be made if you simply upgrade the production of system components to a modern level. We have enormous problems in the element base, communications, commonplace generators. And then you can do new principles.
          1. 0
            April 10 2017 09: 54
            Alas, modernization will not work. Essentially new approaches to solving problems are needed. The essence of these tasks is to organize, in a fundamentally new way, physical processes at the level of magnetic force interactions.
            1. +2
              April 10 2017 11: 24
              you offer a bodyagion with an incomprehensible outcome and incomprehensible terms and costs,
              but there are very specific steps that you just need to take.
              not easier, is it first to make clear, and then do FIG knows what?
              1. 0
                April 10 2017 11: 58
                I see everything a little differently. I don’t offer anything to anyone. And if I propose in another place, then I definitely know with whom and what I'm talking about and what are the prospects for such cooperation. Therefore, if you please distinguish between where and what you can talk about. If you think that in such forums you can talk about serious things and discuss the specifics of introducing certain ideas, then I don’t think so. Here is a search for "needles in a haystack." I am looking for my values, someone else. Another thing is that sometimes I stimulate answers in one form or another. Therefore, I accept your vision of the situation. But for myself I draw conclusions.
      2. +4
        April 9 2017 11: 08
        "Problems begin when it is necessary to supply the developed troops.
        Funny pros from lobby offices "//// begin to work

        Military innovation is stalled, not because of lobbyists, mainly, but because
        budget cuts. And the lack of high-tech specialists in the army.
        Capable tech guys do not rush into the army, as they pay a lot more for a citizen.
        In Israel, as soon as they are not sophisticated, to lure / detain high-tech talents in the army.
        One bespectacled man behind a computer can now replace a battalion, if not a brigade. But go persuade him ... On the strength, on the order / threat, you won’t leave here: only on his enthusiasm can the triangles on the display be correctly turned into strikes by missiles and drones.
        1. +2
          April 9 2017 11: 25
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Military innovation is stalled, not because of lobbyists, mainly, but because
          budget cuts.

          What am I talking about? After all, it is the costs of lobbying that determine whether new models of military equipment will reach the troops or not. And now it has become even more fun there, already in the courts they are beginning to decide what the army needs, and without asking the military themselves, their Wishlist for the courts is the tenth matter.
        2. +1
          April 9 2017 12: 31
          Have you tried to lure with money?
          1. +3
            April 9 2017 15: 49
            Wow! And how! Somehow, our familiar soldier-sergeant was slowed down
            police: "where are you so littering with money? take a taxi?" (dripped on it).
            They hinted that he was a drag dealer ... where else?
            He: "the army pays." Let's go to the bank: tens of thousands of shekels, legal
            from the army. Sorry.
            1. +1
              April 9 2017 18: 50
              Quote: voyaka uh
              where are you so littering with money? do you take a taxi?

              Some strange stories you have. I didn’t come across the Israeli police, but I wondered * to the armed man with the question of why he was taking a taxi ...
              1. 0
                April 10 2017 09: 37
                it's Israel laughing and in general, dripping on a neighbor is sacred.
                Common practice in many countries
                But seriously, Israel holds on to just such petty vigilance.
              2. 0
                April 12 2017 01: 50
                It was a "drug police." They can cling to anyone if there was a tip that the dealer or something like that.
            2. 0
              April 10 2017 12: 02
              I wonder how the army’s discipline requirements influence (on how much) the desire of important specialists to cooperate with the army and to what extent does the money compensate for this?
        3. +1
          April 9 2017 12: 43
          Quote: voyaka uh
          mostly because
          budget cuts. And the lack of high-tech specialists in the army.
          Capable tech guys do not rush into the army, as they pay much more for a citizen

          Well, the trouble here is not that the US military has run out of money. Rather, for a limited resource (cool techies, applied researchers, managers), business and the state are fighting. The government cannot beat business by definition (disparate quality of governance) until it applies force. But in the labor market it will not work.
      3. 0
        April 9 2017 16: 19
        Quote: Spade
        priority in the development of electronic warfare systems, air defense systems

        But how narrow! I say that there is no strategy. We are doing well to Armatu, C500, nuclear submarines, but there are no long-term plans with comprehensive planned R&D for the future.
  3. 0
    April 9 2017 08: 20
    It looks like another bubble for cutting the budget. By the type of shale revolutions and other things.
  4. mvg
    +1
    April 9 2017 08: 38
    Quote: The same Lech
    Participation in the development of an anti-ship supersonic missile with a range of more than 6 kilometers (maximum speed - about 174 M) based on the SM-370 SAM (RIM-3,7 ERAM, Raytheon company).

    Dangerous weapons capable of reaching our low-orbit satellites ...
    I hope in RUSSIA, too, there are surprises for the American satellite constellation ... it is no secret that many successes in aggression against other states of the United States owe precisely to satellites of various purposes.

    This is an anti-ship missile, on satellites "special" SM-3, like)) But 370 (and they write about 600) and> 3M is more abruptly than onyx and 3M-54. And they have fewer problems with target designation, given the E-2 Hawkeye and the E-3 Sentry.
    1. +1
      April 9 2017 10: 04
      Quote: mvg
      This is RCC, according to the satellites "special" SM-3, like))

      Either you were mistaken, or poorly worded. SM-6 is not anti-ship missiles, but missiles designed for any atmospheric purpose. First of all, it’s just the anti-ship missiles (the most difficult to intercept), but the aircraft will also be enough.
      Quote: shovels
      Problems begin when it is necessary to supply the developed troops.

      Anything has happened. You can put in the army another complex and capricious garbage. And you can just steal all the money, also a variant of the rules.
      Another thing is that the Soviet Union, they say, at one time managed to look at Americans who were getting bumpy and take 10 years later to armament is a relatively working analogue. The phrase came across that the Soviet military-industrial complex lagged behind the American quite a bit - like a cargo ship going right behind the icebreaker. Now the Chinese are trying to do it. It is strange to talk about Russia in this context.

      Quote: Egor-dis
      bubble for cutting the budget. Like the shale revolutions

      Sorry to upset you, but
      1. Slates are a completely commercial subject.
      2. Slates, unlike the Pentagon, easily, reliably, for free and forever destroyed Great Russia. The one with 120 oil each. By the way, B. Obama made Great Russia by banning Iran and driving oil above 100.
      1. +4
        April 9 2017 11: 07
        Quote: Octopus
        Slates, unlike the Pentagon, easily, reliably, for free and forever destroyed Great Russia

        Gy 8))))
        Or maybe it’s not “the shale that destroyed Russia”, but the US allies, the Saudis acted on the principle of “separate tobacco” and destroyed the “shale revolution”?
        As earlier, in 2008-2009, they destroyed the “biofuel revolution" in Europe by the same methods.
        The funny thing is that they operate using proven American methods: they paid ecologists and they regularly work out money, arranging tantrums about the "eco-catastrophic" production of shale hydrocarbons.

        With such allies and enemies it is not necessary 8)))))))))))))))))))))))

        Quote: Octopus
        By the way, B. Obama made Great Russia by banning Iran and driving oil above 100.

        eight))))))))))
        And also providing the geopolitical rival, China with cheap hydrocarbons 8))))))))))
        The last smart American president was Bush Sr. He knew how to play Brzezinski chess
        And subsequent presidents up to Trump inclusively exclusively in checkers, and only in "Chapaev" 8)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
        1. +2
          April 9 2017 12: 19
          Quote: Spade
          did the Saudis act on the principle of “separate tobacco” and destroyed the “shale revolution”?

          Horrible. Most importantly, do not tell the Americans that such a fakap with a shale revolution, otherwise they will pay.

          Quote: Spade
          destroyed the "biofuel revolution" in Europe

          It was easy if you were talking about all this rape stuff. One thing is the toys of politicians, another is objective market forces and scientific and technological progress.
          Quote: Spade
          With such allies and enemies it is not necessary

          The situation with US oil production is higher, gas production is lower.
          But OPEC, in fact, is destroyed - it can do nothing more with prices.
          Quote: Spade
          providing geopolitical rival China cheap hydrocarbons

          Yeah, 120 each.
          China, if we are talking about it, was not much affected by this movement - its share of hydrocarbons in the energy balance was relatively small. Freeloaders who imagined themselves partners became a certain “geopolitical” problem - first of all, Great Russia, to a lesser extent Great Venezuela, Great Qatar and Great Nigeria. However, the music did not play for long.
          Quote: Spade
          The last smart American president was Bush Sr.

          Of the last 5 presidents (it’s too early about Trump) - only Bush was unable to be re-elected.
          1. +2
            April 9 2017 12: 40
            Quote: Octopus
            One thing is the toys of politicians, another is objective market forces and scientific and technological progress.

            That's it!
            How did you guess?
            The production of shale hydrocarbons is more expensive than the production of traditional oil and gas. And with lower oil prices, an interesting moment appears when traditional production is still profitable, and shale production is not profitable.
            What did the Saudis do with brilliance, preventing the expansion of the “shale” to Europe

            Quote: Octopus
            Yeah, 120 each.

            Yes, at least 1200.
            Gas pipelines and oil pipelines have been building for a long time, and then they need to be filled with something in order to recapture expenses.
            The confrontation with Iran put an end to all projects for transporting Central Asian and Iranian hydrocarbons to Europe. And the Chinese “cut through” this moment, and all the time this tension was actively building pipelines.
            Moreover, the pressure on Gazprom was also in the hands of China ...

            That is, my thesis about "checkers in" Chapaya "" found another reinforced concrete confirmation. American authorities like one-day butterflies. No attempts to figure out the situation for several moves.

            Of the last 5 presidents (it’s too early about Trump) - only Bush was unable to be re-elected.

            This says a lot about the American electorate ... He doesn’t like people smarter than himself ...
            1. +1
              April 9 2017 13: 07
              Quote: Spade
              The production of shale hydrocarbons is more expensive than the production of traditional oil and gas.

              Holy truth, although there are many details. The Arctic shelf, for example, crashes.
              Quote: Spade
              And with lower oil prices, an interesting moment appears when traditional production is still profitable, and shale production is not profitable.

              Yeah. And this very moment becomes the “right” price for oil. Now it is about $ 50-60. The most advanced ones already have less than $ 40.
              The trouble is that neither at 60, nor even at 40, can Russia build Great Russia. Well, that is, if you don’t work. And with this trouble.
              And in terms of costs - yes, the Saudis can bring down the price of commercial dollars to 15. It would always be there if it was determined economically, not politically. But Ibn Saud after some time outweighed by citizens who are no longer enough for the gold toilet. Guess what at this price will cease to be enough for you.
              Quote: Spade
              What did the Saudis do with brilliance, preventing the expansion of the “shale” to Europe


              Quote: Spade
              And the Chinese “cut through” this moment, and all the time this tension was actively building pipelines.

              As a result, none of their new friends is already rocking - nowhere.
              Yes, the Chinese, on average, better than others understand what they want, so they are * fucking hard. Now, it seems, our former friend Donald seems to be convinced of this.
              Quote: Spade
              That says a lot about the American electorate.

              Somehow I’m not ready to judge the American electorate. But it really says something about you.
              1. +1
                April 9 2017 18: 18
                You don’t understand either oil shale or traditional oil production. Only in copy paste. The difference in export and import is an order of magnitude in favor of export.

                1. 0
                  April 9 2017 18: 30
                  much NOT in favor of export
                2. 0
                  April 9 2017 18: 36
                  Quote: fzr1000
                  you understand. Only in copy paste

                  At least in something.
                  Quote: fzr1000
                  The difference in export and import is an order of magnitude

                  1. Not an order of magnitude.
                  2. And what? Did I write somewhere that the US is a net exporter? Although it may soon come to this.
      2. 0
        April 9 2017 11: 43
        Quote: Octopus
        1. Slates are a completely commercial subject.

        It’s a pity to upset you, but shale is a pyramid worse than MMM, in which a lot of enterprises selling "related products" participate, in the form of equipment for mining and other chipfish, and therefore, are interested in this "MMM" lasting as long as possible and capture as much as possible suckers participants. The loser is the one who buys as much equipment, sites, etc. as possible. by the time the pyramid falls. And so it will be as long as the usual deposits of natural gas remain available.
        1. +1
          April 9 2017 11: 53
          Quote: Egor-dis
          It’s a pity to upset you, but shale is a pyramid worse than MMM

          Believe in these tales.
          Rosneft believed the same thing and even managed to convince the GDP.
          Quote: Egor-dis
          so that this “MMM” lasts as long as possible and captures as many suckers of participants as possible

          I wonder what you say about this
          In the Palyanovskaya area of ​​the Krasnoleninsky field, Gazpromneft-Khantos (a subsidiary of Gazprom Neft) completed the construction of a well with a horizontal section of 1 meters for the development of unconventional reserves - the Bazhenov formation *. A 9-stage hydraulic fracturing ** (hydraulic fracturing) was carried out in a high-tech well, a gushing flow of anhydrous oil from a productive horizon at a depth of 2,3 thousand meters was obtained. The flow rate is more than 45 tons of oil per day.
          As part of a project to develop unconventional reserves in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area, Gazprom Neft was the first in Russia to implement the entire cycle of technological solutions used in the global oil and gas industry to develop shale oil
          “Drilling horizontal wells in the Bazhenov formation with a length of 1000 m and performing multistage hydraulic fracturing in conditions of foreign economic constraints is unique not only for the company, but also for the Russian oil and gas industry. Success of work can be regarded as a huge step forward in developing hard-to-recover reserves, ”said Vadim Yakovlev, First Deputy General Director of Gazprom Neft.

          MMM Gazprom, you say wink
          Quote: Egor-dis
          . And so it will be as long as the usual deposits of natural gas remain available.

          Actually oil, do you want to talk about gas?
          In early November, US gas exports exceeded imports, and the country became a net exporter of “our main” fuel.

          At present, in the United States, according to the Department of Energy, approximately the same amount of gas is produced as is produced in Russian Siberia, reports platts.com

          The main amount of produced gas is obtained by the method of developing shale.
          1. 0
            April 9 2017 12: 32
            Quote: krass
            I wonder what you say about this

            Nothing good.
            Traditional oil can be extracted even by camel breeders. But shale is still only a country with a powerful industrial and financial base. Apart from the United States, no one has succeeded so far. Large-scale development of the Bazhenov Formation in general, and under sanctions in particular, is extremely unlikely.
            1. 0
              April 9 2017 12: 35
              Quote: Egor-dis
              al to upset you, but shale is a pyramid worse than MMM

              Yes, Yegor’s somehow sintered.
              Sorry . Probably went MMM coupons counted
              1. 0
                April 9 2017 18: 19
                And why do you answer foolish copy-paste here? Go to specialized economic forums, rake in your pseudo-theories and streamline.
                1. 0
                  April 9 2017 18: 40
                  Quote: fzr1000
                  Go to specialized economic forums

                  B !, the professional has come. Scatter, shkolota.
                  Quote: fzr1000
                  in its pseudo-theories

                  1. I have no pseudo-theories, except for the fact that the price of oil and the Greatness of Russia are connected at least quadratically.
                  2. I’m in some places, you see, happen.
                2. 0
                  April 10 2017 14: 51
                  In fact, they are not stupid, but quite Internet professionals, and they are quite professionally using the PREPARED information for their work.
              2. 0
                April 9 2017 22: 13
                Quote: krass
                Sorry . Probably went MMM coupons counted

                Why should I recount your coupons? Judging by how you protect shales here, you have invested heavily in them. laughing
                1. 0
                  April 9 2017 22: 22
                  Quote: Egor-dis
                  Why should I recount your coupons? Judging by the way you protect the shales here, you have invested heavily in them

                  I will not hide, it was the case.
                  Picked up well.
          2. +1
            April 9 2017 22: 07
            Quote: krass
            Rosneft believed the same thing and even managed to convince the GDP.

            I’m waiting for proofs on the bulk of oil / gas exports from Russia due to the development of oil shale. The idea that you need to own the technology (even if its profitability is currently doubtful) at least in order to export it (not to mention not to import it) apparently does not visit you.
            Quote: krass
            In early November, US gas exports exceeded imports, and the country became a net exporter of “our main” fuel ....
            ... The main amount of gas produced is obtained by the method of developing shale.
            Why the United States produces gas is purely their own business. And they also eat GMOs and fast foods. But this does not mean at all that everyone else should do the same. About the environmental problems of the development of oil shale, they wrote here without me. Which, of course, are not included in the price of oil / gas and are not taken into account by analytes, but in the end they hit on the pocket much more. The fact that the United States began to actively develop oil shales only means that difficult times began in the country.
            1. +2
              April 9 2017 22: 26
              Quote: Egor-dis
              I’m waiting for proofs on the bulk of oil / gas exports from Russia due to the development of oil shale.

              Do not wait - technology under sanctions
              Quote: Egor-dis
              Why the United States produces gas is purely their own business.

              Of course - oh they mine from shale
              Quote: Egor-dis
              And they also eat GMOs and fast foods

              And?
              Moreover, their average life expectancy is higher than in Russia
              Quote: Egor-dis
              About the environmental problems of the development of oil shale, they wrote here without me.

              You were unlikely to be in the USA, I have been more than once. There, ecology is much cooler than in Russia
              Quote: Egor-dis
              Which, of course, are not included in the price of oil / gas

              CEP knows maybe perfectly knows the American language and in general in the subject
              laughing
              Quote: Egor-dis
              The fact that the United States began to actively develop oil shales only means that difficult times began in the country.

              What would you live like laughing laughing laughing
              1. 0
                April 10 2017 07: 54
                Quote: krass
                Do not wait - technology under sanctions

                Shield? belay Has the USA banned the development of oil shale in Russia? These are all-powerful and all-pervasive American sanctions! laughing
                Quote: krass
                Moreover, their average life expectancy is higher than in Russia
                With their bouquet of diseases and the cost of medicine, they probably regret that it is not lower than in Russia.
                Quote: krass
                You were unlikely to be in the USA, I have been more than once.
                Do not compare travel with emigration. wink
                Quote: krass
                There, ecology is much cooler than in Russia
                And if the cool environmentalists were so broken through the knee (although why be surprised), then this only confirms my words.
                Quote: krass
                What would you live like
                pah-pah-pah (tapped wood). I feel better here. But no one is holding you here and the American "paradise" has already been waiting for you.
            2. +2
              April 9 2017 22: 30
              Quote: Egor-dis
              the bulk of oil / gas exports from Russia through the development of shale

              This is not, and most likely never will be. For this you need to work, not cut.
              Quote: Egor-dis
              at least in order to export it

              The opus below rightly writes that without cheap money this technology will not pay off. And it’s not about money. Any Devon Energy would have been sold for a long time to a glass from Tver, and J. Larry Nichols would have been either in London or in prison.
              Quote: Egor-dis
              About the environmental problems of the development of oil shale, they wrote here without me. Which, of course, are not included in the price of oil / gas and are not taken into account by analytes, but in the end they hit on the pocket much more.

              Fighting for the US ecology in Russia is a great way to spend time.
              Quote: Egor-dis
              hard times began in the country.

              They do not end in the USA since the time of Karl Marx, at least. How they are still not there "Roskomnadzor" - I do not understand.
              1. 0
                April 10 2017 08: 05
                Quote: Octopus
                Fighting for the US ecology in Russia is a great way to spend time.
                Personally, it makes no difference to me, but logic tells me that when they finally ditch her, they will reach the others. And so already, how many years, a box is opened to Siberia.
                Quote: Octopus
                They do not end in the USA since the time of Karl Marx, at least. How they are still not there "Roskomnadzor" - I do not understand.
                Exclusively due to migrants from places with favorable demographic conditions. Without this, by now, the continent would again belong to the Native Americans (Indians) completely and completely.
                1. +1
                  April 10 2017 13: 21
                  Quote: Egor-dis
                  Exclusively at the expense of migrants from places with prosperous demographic conditions

                  To steal money in Russia - to escape to the USA - to die. Well, the normal circuit works great. 330 million already, not counting illegal immigrants.
                  Quote: Egor-dis
                  . how old is, to Siberia open a box.

                  Another will read Albright's mind.
                  But the idea is rich. I want to see the Americans raid in Omsk. I hope they will take pavers from America that is dying, otherwise all legs will break.
                  Quote: Octopus
                  American "paradise" has already been waiting for you.

                  Here, to be honest, the main problem.
                  Quote: Egor-dis
                  Do not compare travel with emigration

                  Well, yes, you cannot trust my classmates, they are being tortured there to lie to me. Only through the channel Russia they tell the truth, and RenTV yet.
                  Quote: Egor-dis
                  cool ecologists have broken

                  American environmentalists, unlike European ones, have not yet completely cleared out all the common sense partisans. Viva la resistance!
                  Quote: Egor-dis
                  they probably regret

                  At this point there should be links to suicides of cancer patients.
                  Quote: Egor-dis
                  banned

                  Yes, but alas, these are not Americans. To drill one (two, ten) well, how to fly into space - yes. But to create an industry - hundreds of boreholes, thousands of wells - is impossible in Russia.
                  1. 0
                    April 10 2017 19: 06
                    Quote: Octopus
                    To steal money in Russia - to escape to the USA - to die. Well, the normal circuit works great. 330 million already, not counting illegal immigrants.
                    I did not know that all Chinese, Indians, Arabs and Mexicans, before fading into America, first stole money in Russia. What a rich country, however, and many complain.

                    Quote: Octopus
                    But the idea is rich. I want to see the Americans raid in Omsk. I hope they will take pavers from America that is dying, otherwise all legs will break.
                    Why do they need it? They will hire someone like you to carry them in a carriage, like a Chinese rickshaw, or in a sleigh, given the slightly more northern latitudes.
                    Quote: Octopus
                    Well, yes, you cannot trust my classmates, they are being tortured there to lie to me.
                    I can name a few reasons at once why your friends cannot be an objective source.
                    Quote: Octopus
                    At this point there should be links to suicides of cancer patients.
                    Suicide among regular antidepressants will suffice. About Obama's medical reform, he is modestly silent, for he will draw on a separate branch of the discussion.
                    Quote: Octopus
                    Yes, but alas, these are not Americans. To drill one (two, ten) well, how to fly into space - yes. But to create an industry - hundreds of boreholes, thousands of wells - is impossible in Russia.
                    You still lament that Russia stubbornly does not want to develop horse-drawn transport. A simple question - WHY? What is the urgent need for the development of such an industry specifically in Russia, specifically NOW? The Americans did not have normal deposits, from the Middle East or where else, carrying hydrocarbons is expensive, we have to play with the development of shales. And why do we need it? Experimental and training development is, purely for the development of technology, and that's enough. And so, we calmly develop deposits, develop the Arctic and enjoy life.
                    1. 0
                      April 10 2017 20: 50
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      I did not know that everyone ... stole money in Russia.

                      These are the details.
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      to carry them in a stroller, like a Chinese rickshaw

                      1. Have you been to China? Where did you see the rickshaw there?
                      2. The average salary in China is 1,7 times higher than in Omsk. By median, the difference is likely to be even greater.
                      3. Pavers are still needed. That one.

                      Americans can’t stand it. Wimps.
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      why your friends cannot be an objective source.

                      Not necessary. I do not believe in the existence of objective sources.
                      But I’m sure that they haven’t rested there yet and are not torn back. By the way, for one of them "back" can be incl. Israel, so there’s a lot to choose from.
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      Suicide among regular antidepressants will suffice.

                      Find suicide statistics, or myself?
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      A simple question - WHY?

                      You see, for any industry you need more or less the same thing. Engineering, finance, training, etc. Therefore, I am quite sure that neither this, nor any other industry in Russia will appear in the foreseeable future.
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      calmly develop deposits

                      Not a single major new field.
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      mastering the Arctic

                      This will never happen.
                      Quote: Egor-dis
                      and enjoy life.

                      Hawthorn rises in price, do not miss the discounts.
                      1. 0
                        April 11 2017 00: 32
                        Quote: Octopus
                        You see, for any industry you need more or less the same thing. Engineering, finance, training, etc. Therefore, I am quite sure that neither this, nor any other industry in Russia will appear in the foreseeable future.
                        Yes, yes, "the economy is torn to shreds" (c), we heard, remember. laughing
                        Quote: Octopus
                        Not a single major new field.
                        There are still enough old ones.
                        Quote: Octopus
                        This will never happen.
                        laughing laughing laughing This is already happening. But, your belief in a "torn to shred economy" does not allow this fact to be recognized.
                        Quote: Octopus
                        Hawthorn rises in price, do not miss the discounts.
                        Your American friends have already shared antidepressant drugs with you. laughing laughing laughing
                      2. +1
                        April 11 2017 10: 57
                        Quote: Egor-dis
                        economy torn to shreds

                        You're right. The nigga acted ugly, clung to the achievements of the Sovereign and his boyars. Between us, the foul American manner.
                        Quote: Egor-dis
                        There are still enough old ones.

                        You're right. The imminent n * t is scheduled for the mid-20s.
                        Quote: Egor-dis
                        This is already happening.

                        There is another opinion.
                        https://russian.rt.com/business/news/373428-cena-
                        neft-dobycha-arktika
                        And there is an opinion that the numbers in that first opinion should be multiplied by 1,5
                        Quote: Egor-dis
                        your faith in a torn economy

                        You see, this is not a matter of faith.
                        http://golovin-k101.livejournal.com/114343.html
                        I note that the article was written 2 years before that's all
      3. +2
        April 9 2017 20: 57
        Quote: Octopus
        1. Slates are a completely commercial subject.

        Let me slightly disappoint you
        Quote: Octopus
        with a shale revolution, or else they’ll cry.

        SR is fundamentally possible with the Fed becoming (refinancing) from 0 to 3%, however, like all the "wealth" of the Western world.
        shale technologies have been known for a long time.
        under Reagan, shale mining was not possible (despite the cost of a barrel)

        Here (under Reagan) the cost of a shale bar is far beyond 120 $
        and the fact that this is a “about nothing” bet is understandable to very many.
        "All the top 15 are in debt and that's good," many say, but it’s not.
        Not at all like that.
        2. The oil is the final product (it does not matter which), OTHERWISE AS AND THE VODKA is fresh.
        Let's wait for 2050 years.
        You can pump and “make” shale oil at 40 $ per barrel, but buy fresh water at 200 $ / ton, I wonder what will happen?
        The gap between water supply and demand is constantly growing, and is expected to reach 40% by 2030 year.

        This is especially true (from the "golden 15") -America
        The largest consumers of water (by volume) are India, China, USA, Pakistan, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Mexico and the Russian Federation.

        The most endowed with the resources of river flows are such states as Brazil, Russia, then Canada, China, Indonesia, the USA, and India. But in recent decades, due to discharges of industrial waste without treatment, many rivers are simply poisoned (especially in India, China).


        Map of the world reserves of fresh groundwater.


        Half of the daily water consumed in the United States comes from non-renewable underground sources. At the moment, 36 states are on the verge of a serious problem, some of them on the verge of a water crisis. Lack of water in California, Arizona, Nevada, in Las Vegas.
        And if Asia tolerates, then the USA will have problems: USA - 125 kg / meat per person, and this is water.
        - it takes to produce food for one person 2000-5000 liters daily.

        and a normal person needs only 2-4 liters (for a drink)
        Water has become a key security strategy and foreign policy priority for the US administration. Currently, the Pentagon and other organizations concerned with US security have come to the conclusion that in order to preserve the US military and economic power, they must protect not only energy sources, but also water resources.
        Quote: Octopus
        and forever destroyed Great Russia.

        I hope to live up to the time when a little water at 500 $ / ton will forever destroy great America.
        1. +1
          April 9 2017 21: 29
          Quote: opus
          Let me slightly disappoint you

          Well, try it.
          Quote: opus
          possible with the rate of the Fed (refinancing) from 0 to 3%

          Yes, this method is capital intensive. Therefore, I write that as it turns out so far only in the United States. There is money and technology, for example, in Europe, but there with regulation of the seams.
          However, I do not see any problem in this. Money, as you rightly noted, is now cheap.
          Quote: opus
          but at the same time buy fresh water for $ 200 / ton

          Technical fresh water is a commodity, not a resource. Now the cost is 40 cents (3-4 kW / h per ton). With an investment (with existing technologies) of $ 13 per ton of desalinated water per year. In the future, of course, the price will fall (if you remove the political issues).
          In parentheses, I note that desalination plants are an ideal energy consumer, smoothing out any peaks, especially in combination with renewable energy sources.
          Quote: opus
          will reach 40% by 2030.

          For which I do not like ecologists - they (on average) cannot without lies.
          Quote: opus
          California water shortage

          Change the guber.
          Quote: opus
          Arizona, Nevada

          Buy in Israel. Not water, of course, but specialists.
          Quote: opus
          125 kg / meat per person, and this is water.

          But is it necessary to produce meat in Nevada?
          Quote: opus
          Water has become a key security strategy and foreign policy priority for the US administration.

          You have found a new meaning in the expression "wet dreams."
          Quote: opus
          I hope to live up to the time when some water at $ 500 / ton

          Sorry. However, in Russia, you may survive. And much earlier than you would like. They will give your water supply to Mr. R or Mr. T - they will, they can.
        2. +2
          April 9 2017 22: 29
          Quote: opus
          about buying fresh water at $ 200 / ton, I wonder what will happen?

          Actually, it's a little expensive. You probably think of bottled.
          In Israel, the cost of desalinated water is 40 cents a ton.
          1. 0
            April 9 2017 22: 49
            Quote: krass
            You probably think of bottled.

            Most of the text and pictures are taken from here.
            http://www.vigorconsult.ru/resources/mirovoy-ryin
            ok-presnoy-vodyi /
            But about the prices of $ 200-500 comrades, it seems, he came up with himself.
            The text quoted is written in a typically leftist style, in order to somehow remove the problems of black Africa from the predatory nature of Western capitalism. The fact that water problems are only and exclusively problems with the quality of government’s work is clumsy. If you recognize him, it turns out that there are no problems with fresh water in Singapore (where there is none at all), but in Russia, where at least * eat it drink it - it’s quite possible.
      4. 0
        April 10 2017 09: 40
        Slates destroy the ecosystem from the word altogether. If the United States promotes this topic, part of its territory will become Inferno. And I'm not sure that it costs the money that they will gain from the sale of the extracted resource.
        1. 0
          April 10 2017 12: 56
          Quote: yehat
          part of their territory will turn into Inferno.

          I allow myself to give advice: do not read any fighters for the rights of blacks, they always they lie. Especially when it comes to American blacks. American blacks can cope without the Russian-speaking "experts."
          With regard to the topic of conversation: the case, if you forget it, happens in the United States. People who really there is something to say about damage from mining, they write not articles on the Internet, but lawsuits. As far as I know, they have not yet presented convincing arguments
          1. 0
            April 10 2017 13: 42
            when it starts, they will not have time for lawsuits
            1. 0
              April 10 2017 13: 53
              Quote: yehat
              they will not have time for lawsuits

              Them always to lawsuits. It’s like in f * ck, even nicer, if it’s already old. Infa 100%, I heard on TV.
            2. ZVO
              0
              26 January 2018 07: 22
              Quote: yehat
              when it starts, they will not have time for lawsuits


              Hydraulic fracturing, it is fracking - it’s the main mechanism in the development of shale has been used everywhere for 20 years ....
              and on the slates. and conventional oil wells.
              I have a few people. engaged in hydraulic fracturing ..
              And including the head of the "fleet" ...

              So it goes a long time and in Bashkiria. and in the Volga region. and in the Orenburg region, and even in Western Sitira - in general, in every second well ...
  5. 0
    April 9 2017 11: 03
    Russia's security does not rest on a prodigy, but on the power of a nuclear missile shield. High-precision weapons are good at conducting a local war of low / medium intensity, but it is absolutely useless in a world war. All American concepts of the war against Russia and China are smashed to smithereens for one simple reason - in response to an attack by conventional means, US adversaries will launch nuclear weapons, and if they completely relinquish them, they will launch strategic nuclear forces. This alignment is categorically unacceptable for the United States.
    1. 0
      April 10 2017 09: 42
      however, the United States continues to build a global network for delivering accurate and quick strikes.
      And now within 24 hours they can begin to bomb anywhere in the world. About a quarter of the land mass of the planet is controlled by their air defense forces. Ignoring these possibilities is stupid.
  6. +6
    April 9 2017 11: 15
    Noteworthy is the very idea of ​​long-term planning with the involvement of fundamental science, manufacturers, business partners, and intelligence.
    I would like to hope that similar work is also being carried out behind the GDP words about the "asymmetric response", we just don’t see it. Due to the aggressive paranoia of the bourgeoisie, this becomes a matter of survival, and not only of Russia, but of everyone around. It is sad, but in the Russian long-term planning it is imperative to include one more element: the criminal responsibility for participating in the “cutting” of money, to defend the homeland is a great honor ...
    1. 0
      April 9 2017 12: 17
      Obviously, now the conversation is not about slogans or patriotic rantings, but about competence in solving present and perspective strategic tasks. Therefore, the most depressing fact is that there are no specialists who can distinguish ideas based on the basic foundations of past discoveries and inventions and ideas based on fundamentally new methods for solving fundamental scientific, technical and defense problems. The current situation says that there is a balance of scientific and technological potential in the field of fundamental principles and armaments. However, the system can be very easily unbalanced by any fundamental discovery and invention. The grounds for this exist as obvious objectivity.
      1. 0
        April 10 2017 13: 43
        despite the fact that you are using the terms of NTP, the impression is that you have a mystical position laughing
  7. +1
    April 9 2017 13: 42
    so to speak. Comments to the article are much more interesting than the article itself. just some kind of advertising booklet. over a generation in the USA there will not be more than one young American (by origin) engineer, all technical universities are crammed with Indians by the Chinese, etc. and which country the Chinese engineers will work for, the resources will be American. and the results will go to China.
    1. +1
      April 9 2017 14: 09
      Quote: core
      and the results will go to China

      Yeah. About the results of Oppenheimer - to Israel, von Braun - to Germany, Brin - Russia, Mask - South Africa.
      1. +1
        April 9 2017 14: 59
        You very subtly note such a circumstance that indeed a discovery can fall into any hands. The question is which of the leaders of the relevant departments and which country will pay attention to what others will ignore.
        1. 0
          April 10 2017 17: 03
          I did not write about "hands."
          All these people are Americans. Jewish, German, Russian (Jewish) go, Afro-Dutch origin. There were both Chinese and Indian. There will probably be more of these narrow-eyed ones. Americans.
          That is why they are strong. Like Agent Smith. Anyone can become an American.
          1. 0
            April 11 2017 12: 59
            By the way, in Russia they announced the creation of a new generation aircraft engine with a thrust of up to 35 tons-PD-35. So for several years now I have been positioning the concept of such an engine with the justification of fundamentally new process algorithms in it. And now I am absolutely sure that for Russian scientists this is an “unbearable burden”. I will explain why. Because, firstly, it is necessary to choose the right direction of oriented research. This means that if the new engine will be created on the old basis of the formation of air dynamic processes on the blades, the result will be zero. Because there is a fundamental problem of centrifugal forces at which it is impossible to radically increase either the rotor speed or increase the radius of the rotor. Here is the answer to you that the article mentions that specialized institutions cannot always succeed. This means that the development of various independent scientists can easily go into any hands.
    2. 0
      April 10 2017 15: 14
      I also got the impression.
  8. 0
    April 9 2017 13: 44
    All ballistic missiles are hypersonic. Railguns are still a technological dead end. Not only because the atmosphere greatly affects the ammunition, but also because the rails of the firing device wear out very much after EVERY shot. There is a current of tens of kiloamperes. And the arc burns between the rails. Which, in fact, accelerates the projectile. Does everyone know what electric welding is?
    1. 0
      April 10 2017 09: 45
      railgun technology theoretically carries the potential for a quantum leap in the firepower of artillery. It’s hard to say how effective it can be, but it’s better to look for something than to stagnate. Moreover, the search is conducted in other directions - rockets, shells with steering systems, etc.
  9. +1
    April 9 2017 21: 13
    about the history of the railgun - who and why "sold" his idea to admirals:

    forums.airbase.ru/2014/04/t86165--relsotron.html

    glav.su/forum/5/126/threads/1137161/

    glav.su/forum/5/126/threads/394212/
  10. 0
    April 10 2017 10: 17
    It is very interesting to observe that the concept of "strategic speed" already exists, but however, in creating basic physical processes it is not yet understood that the same algorithmic process, but with different phase velocities, can form a completely new quality of the result.
    1. 0
      April 12 2017 13: 11
      Personally, for example, I did not understand what you mean :)
  11. 0
    April 11 2017 22: 35
    Quote: Octopus
    You're right. The imminent n * t is scheduled for the mid-20s.
    Verily I say unto you, on May 4, 1925, the earth will fly upon the axis of heaven! (with) laughing
    Quote: Octopus
    There is another opinion.
    https://russian.rt.com/business/news/373428-cena-
    neft-dobycha-arktika
    And there is an opinion that the numbers in that first opinion should be multiplied by 1,5
    That immediately multiply by 15, for complacency. laughing
    You see, this is not a matter of faith.
    http://golovin-k101.livejournal.com/114343.html
    I note that the article was written 2 years before this is all
    Right through the text, the faces of the Chubais brothers clearly appear. laughing laughing laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"