Military Review

T-72B3 new modification at the rehearsal of the parade in Alabino

56
According to "Messenger of Mordovia”, 5 on April, during the rehearsal of the Victory Parade in Alabino, the modernized T-72B3 tank with additional protection was presented to the public.


T-72B3 new modification at the rehearsal of the parade in Alabino


There are two major improved modifications of the T-72B3. The first option, the so-called "biathlon" or T-72B3М, is distinguished by the presence of additional protection (lattice anti-cumulative screens, DZ "Relikt"), the Sosna-U all-day sight, the updated 2А46М-5-01 gun, which is also used, which is more than a problem, which also has a more than 100-template, more than 100; (92 hp instead of 2), modern communications.



A more simplified modification does not have, unlike the “biathlon” version of the panoramic sight, the “Relict” dynamic protection. They are easily distinguished from the classic T-72B3 by the presence of side screens. The first contract for the supply of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation of this modification tanks was concluded in 2015. It provides for a major overhaul with the modernization of 154 T-72B-type vehicles, bringing the T-72BZ to type with additional protection during 2015 - 2017. According to available information, the shipment of the contracted equipment began at the end of 2016. In March, tanks of this model were seen when they were received by the 8 Army of the Southern Military District.

Photos used:
http://vestnik-rm.ru/news-4-19612.htm
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Thrall
    Thrall April 6 2017 10: 29
    +9
    “The Kremlin is preparing armored tanks for the capture of Lithuania” - headlines for tomorrow's Lithuanian newspapers smile
    1. Muvka
      Muvka April 6 2017 10: 35
      +5
      Finally showed a new modification. And it was a lot of unbelievers ... :)
    2. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 April 6 2017 13: 08
      +2
      Right! Russia is preparing, like the USSR, a tank breakthrough to the English Channel ....................
    3. RASKAT
      RASKAT April 6 2017 14: 24
      +5
      Excellent modification of the T-72 I'm glad.
      And here is a couple of shots of equipment that lit up at the rehearsal of the parade.
      Arctic air defense system Armor and Torah

      1. RASKAT
        RASKAT April 6 2017 14: 33
        +2
        Here is the passage of the technology of the 2017 parade
        Damn something does not give well, whoever wants can look at the pens.
  2. MPK105
    MPK105 April 6 2017 10: 32
    10
    Yeah ... Well ... Armata, they began to be safely buried, shouting honest all over the world ... But when we upgrade the T-34, you won’t tell me ... ?????????
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 6 2017 10: 40
      25
      Quote: MPK105
      Yeah ... Well ... Armata, became-safely buried, buzzing the whole world honest ..

      Lesha, sarcasm again? what Armata is now in army trials and no one is going to bury it, well, unless they dream of bulk with Khodorkovsky. yes
      Quote: MPK105
      .A T-34 when we upgrade, do not tell me ... ?????????

      And why should the T-34 be modernized at the monuments, they will be painted with new paint. drinks yes
      1. MPK105
        MPK105 April 6 2017 10: 43
        +6
        Well, I can’t without sarcasm, reading news like hi drinks
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain April 6 2017 10: 45
          20
          Quote: MPK105
          Well, I can’t without sarcasm, reading news like

          Yes, we understand, the same mockingbirds. fellow
    2. Thrall
      Thrall April 6 2017 10: 44
      +7
      Quote: MPK105
      T-34 when we upgrade, do not tell me ...?

      T-34 in some countries is still at war. So, early to upgrade it, be patient a little more smile
      1. i80186_
        i80186_ April 6 2017 10: 55
        +6
        Quote: Thrall
        T-34 in some countries is still at war. So, early to upgrade it, be patient a little more

        And in some countries this is what they are doing. smile
    3. venik
      venik April 6 2017 10: 45
      12
      Quote: MPK105
      Armata, began to be safely buried, buzzing the whole world honest ...

      ======
      And where does "Armata"? "Armata" is generally a fundamentally new PLATFORM, on the basis of which it is planned to build up to 2 T-500 tanks .... But !! Firstly, this is when it will be ... So far it is known that 14 units were built in 2015. for testing. At the end of 20 - the serial production of an experimental batch of 2016 units began, for the military "break-in" and training personnel.
      And secondly, 2.5 thousand pieces for Russia is not just a little, but VERY little! Whether it will be more money to build - is still unclear (the tank is NOT OF CHEAP !!!). So, the concept, in general, is clear - the T-14 is used “on the edge” of the strike and the most tank-dangerous directions and is covered by the good old T-72 / T-90 and T-80 ...
      And then the 72nd of which there are more than one thousand pieces - WHERE TO DO ??? For scrapping ?? Will it be too "bold" ???
      1. MPK105
        MPK105 April 6 2017 10: 59
        +6
        Yes it was a cry of the soul, the namesake of the President hi It happens to me (men will confirm here) -Do not pay attention ... wink
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 6 2017 11: 53
        +2
        It should also be borne in mind that the promised 2500 are Armata platforms, not tanks.
        1. venik
          venik April 6 2017 19: 11
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          It should also be borne in mind that the promised 2500 are Armata platforms, not tanks.

          =====
          No, it's like the T-14 !! But still LITTLE !!! All T-72, T-80 and T-90 - DO NOT REPLACE !!! Yes, probably, and DO NOT !!! But to have an “Armored fist” (with the support of by no means weak, albeit somewhat outdated cars), which few can resist (if you really can anyone!) - IT'S NOT WRONG !!!
      3. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 April 6 2017 13: 12
        +1
        Absolutely agree! drinks
    4. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 6 2017 10: 58
      11
      Quote: MPK105
      Armata, they began to be safely buried, shouting honest to the whole world ... But when we upgrade the T-34, you won’t tell me ...

      Duc ... and what to do? It is necessary to fight BTV on something, while “Armata” is brought to mind. The fundamentally new tank in the troops of the first years was horror-horror-horror. Plus, a long and tedious correspondence between the plant and the army team, which on the one hand inquires - that the designers and factory workers smoked, having made some tricky knot, which is nicht arbayten in the field, and from the inside they can’t get to it, but on the other they ask why the hell did “qualified” crews and technicians not read the instructions and try to operate the equipment in unintended modes with unforeseen service (if this is translated into censorship). smile
      And, EMNIP, Armata was not planned as an MBT - it is a tank of high-quality amplification.
      I’m interested in another thing: what garden plant the hole in the forehead of the T-72B3 tower of the new model was half closed: on the one side they put a DZ, and on the other - bare steel and a nanobarz? belay
      Okay, the original T-72B3 - it was made from the calculation "quickly, quickly, many, many - otherwise tomorrow we have a resource of Soviet yok tanks, and all BTVs will walk"But now, having riveted as many as a thousand T-72B3s and" satisfying the hunger "of the BTV, could all the complaints about the old one be eliminated in his new model?
      1. MPK105
        MPK105 April 6 2017 11: 11
        +6
        good I always read you with pleasure, everything about the case, in detail, in detail ... hi Write more often ... For amateurs ... Like me repeat
      2. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 April 6 2017 13: 14
        +1
        The unsuccessful designer caught ......... laughing
      3. Nehist
        Nehist April 6 2017 14: 29
        +1
        Oh how well characterized T-14 !!! According to reports from the troops, the tank is difficult to operate, there are many minor flaws, so they’ll bring them to mind for another 10 years hi In general, the army team is not happy, a heavy sau could be simpler and cheaper to do ....
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA April 6 2017 15: 25
          +4
          Quote: Nehist
          Oh how well characterized T-14 !!!

          Chihiks ... in fact, I gave a brief summary of the correspondence on the development of the T-34 and KV troops. smile
          Just a fundamentally new technology in the army usually at first raises the same questions. And the meaning of the correspondence does not change from what the army received - T-34, T-64 or Armata.
      4. venik
        venik April 6 2017 19: 37
        +2
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Okay, the original T-72B3 - it was made at the rate of "fast, fast, many, many - otherwise tomorrow we have the resource of Soviet yok tanks, and all BTVs will go on foot." But now, having riveted as many as a thousand T-72B3s and “satisfying the hunger” of BTVs, could all the complaints about the old one be eliminated in his new model?

        ======
        You also forgot about Slingshot ... If it’s true that she has already joined the troops, then OY! For all that, according to the TTX complex, it doesn’t surpass either “abrash” or “modeling”, but with a well-trained crew it can easily “pile” on it “I can’t” itself, so that “it won’t seem a little” .. ...
    5. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 April 6 2017 13: 09
      +2
      Why did you forget? She is now being tested at full speed. About "Armata" I think we will hear a year from 1,5-2
  3. activator
    activator April 6 2017 10: 36
    +1
    And that this year there will not be an armada parade? something is not mentioned about her.
    1. Sergey Ui
      Sergey Ui April 6 2017 10: 43
      0
      https://youtu.be/ysdVIvwzFTA
      1. Sergey Ui
        Sergey Ui April 6 2017 10: 44
        +5
        Will armata
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 6 2017 11: 54
          0
          Something not a single MLRS, there is no rehearsal.
  4. kolkulon
    kolkulon April 6 2017 10: 37
    +1
    If they start up after b3 t90e, without armature, it will be clowning in general.
  5. Coconut
    Coconut April 6 2017 10: 39
    +1
    after reading the media of Ukraine and Russia over the past 5 years on the territory of Russia about 8 ..9 thousand T-72s do not write anything about the modification ... even if these tanks shoot shit .. the Baltic countries do not shine anything good ..)))
  6. Mike2388
    Mike2388 April 6 2017 10: 40
    +1
    Does he have the same protection on board as on the T 90 MS or what? It’s a pity they didn’t do it right away. And then the first T72B3 turned liquidy ...
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 6 2017 11: 07
      +7
      Quote: Mike2388
      It’s a pity they didn’t do it right away. And then the first T72B3 turned liquidy ...

      So the first T-72B3 did, driving the tank into two Procrustean beds. Firstly, after UVZ raised the cost of the new T-90 by almost 70% over the year, the Moscow Region set a condition: during modernization, it was necessary to keep within 52 million per tank at any cost. Secondly, the same MO demanded to increase the production of tanks threefold - up to 180-200 vehicles a year. And so it turned out a budget mass tank to replace the Soviet-made T-72A / B, which was driven in the tail and mane without replacement from the time of the Tagged.
  7. kolkulon
    kolkulon April 6 2017 10: 45
    +1
    Although if the three Pak-fa are allowed, I will close my eyes to the passage of retrotechnics.
  8. pepel79
    pepel79 April 6 2017 11: 01
    +3
    Opachki, the tank received additional protection for the sides of the tower, in the form of dynamic protection designed for lightly armored vehicles ...
    1. Brod9iga25
      Brod9iga25 April 6 2017 11: 46
      +4
      If you click on the link to the source of the material, you’ll read that the reactive armor is installed in the so-called soft case, I think due to the fact that these units are installed in the back of the turret, this is a goal that would not damage rear infantry.,
  9. gabonskijfront
    gabonskijfront April 6 2017 11: 09
    0
    C-class, budget option. Real boys do not fight on such.
  10. Mike2388
    Mike2388 April 6 2017 11: 20
    +1
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Quote: Mike2388
    It’s a pity they didn’t do it right away. And then the first T72B3 turned liquidy ...

    So the first T-72B3 did, driving the tank into two Procrustean beds. Firstly, after UVZ raised the cost of the new T-90 by almost 70% over the year, the Moscow Region set a condition: during modernization, it was necessary to keep within 52 million per tank at any cost. Secondly, the same MO demanded to increase the production of tanks threefold - up to 180-200 vehicles a year. And so it turned out a budget mass tank to replace the Soviet-made T-72A / B, which was driven in the tail and mane without replacement from the time of the Tagged.


    Yes, I thought so too. But nothing seems to have changed. 90 did not fall in price especially. The military probably got even less money. They have a decline in production or something, free hands appeared and became generous on the screens? It seems that they quickly understood the defectiveness of the first B3 and then these: "Well, all the guys, not only serve conscripts on these tanks, maybe they will go to battle, let's have screens and a panorama (Syrian experience)."
    1. Muvka
      Muvka April 6 2017 11: 24
      +2
      And where does the experience of Syria? An order for them was issued in 2015. And before the order there was still some development time.
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 6 2017 18: 17
      +2
      Quote: Mike2388
      The military probably got even less money. They have a decline in production or something, free hands appeared and became generous on the screens? It seems that they quickly understood the defectiveness of the first B3 and then these: "Well, all the guys, not only serve conscripts on these tanks, maybe they will go to battle, let's have screens and a panorama (Syrian experience)."

      So according to the shortcomings of the T-72B3, everything was clear from the beginning.
      Just at the time of the decision on the initial T-72B3, the situation was such that almost the entire fleet of BTTs needed to be replaced - and this was about 2-2,5 thousand cars. New cars then came in the amount of 65 units per year. Therefore, they chose the cheapest and easiest upgrade option: the new tank was supposed to be better than the most massive army tank - T-72A / B.
      After several years of production of the T-72B3 in the basic configuration, the "tank crisis" was eliminated - and one could think about reducing the number of purchased vehicles with increasing their level. Because the reference level has changed: the new mass tank and the base for comparison were not T-72A / B, as before, but the base T-72B3 - in mid-2016 they were already released about 1000 pieces. smile
  11. Mike2388
    Mike2388 April 6 2017 11: 30
    0
    Quote: Muvka
    And where does the experience of Syria? An order for them was issued in 2015. And before the order there was still some development time.

    Despite the fact that those tanks that received this order earlier, differed from these for the worse. Read the article.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka April 6 2017 11: 49
      +4
      This you read:
      "They can be easily distinguished from the classic T-72B3 by the presence of side screens. The first contract for the supply of the Russian Ministry of Defense with this modification of tanks was concluded in 2015."
      And I read about this modification in January 2016.
      1. Mike2388
        Mike2388 April 6 2017 12: 02
        +1
        What is it classic? He appeared in 2014, has already become a classic laughing ? This is the same repair - the modernization of the existing 72B to the B3 level, made due to the inability to purchase T 90. And how many contracts there were signed for this business does not change the essence. This is the same program.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka April 6 2017 12: 24
          +4
          AND? What is the problem? At 2 years old, the classic B3 was produced (14-15 years), now a newer modification is available, from the end of 15, the beginning of 16. What's wrong? And what does the Syrian experience have to do with it, I strongly do not understand. And I’ll tell you a secret, they put lattices on tanks for a very long time.
          1. Mike2388
            Mike2388 April 6 2017 12: 35
            +1
            This “modification of the B3 of the 16th year, the modification of the B3 of the 14th year of the modification of the 72B ...” with the same success could be bought in the 14th year. ALL of these stray are already there. And these are very useful pribludy. Are they raising the price so much? Maybe you know? So I ask why, then, they bought 2 years of govnomodifikatsiya B3 14 years, which can not be allowed into battle. Purely for slaughter conscripts? Enlighten pliz "in secret" you are our specialist in gratings.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka April 6 2017 13: 23
              +4
              Yes. They significantly increase the price, because the Relic - not Contact, dviglo on 1130 horses - not dviglo on 840 horses, etc. Everything is different there from the first modification - a gun from the T-90, electronics, communications, sights, SLAs, even more advanced tracks. And because the tank is more expensive.
              1. Mike2388
                Mike2388 April 6 2017 13: 30
                +1
                How much? 52 lama cost 3 B2014. How much does this one cost? Where did the money come from, which "was not" in 2014? If it is so expensive, can it make sense to buy 90?
                1. Muvka
                  Muvka April 6 2017 14: 00
                  +4
                  Almost 80 million. More than one and a half times.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. Stabilization
                      Stabilization April 6 2017 22: 39
                      0
                      I dare to repeat your text dear colleague Muvka) ...
                      “Just at the time of the decision on the original T-72B3, the situation was such that almost the entire BTT fleet required replacement - and this was about 2-2,5 thousand cars. New machines then came in the amount of 65 units per year. Therefore, we chose the cheapest and the easiest upgrade option: the new tank was supposed to be better than the most massive army tank - T-72A / B.
                      After several years of production of the T-72B3 in the basic configuration, the "tank crisis" was eliminated - and one could think about reducing the number of purchased vehicles with increasing their level. Because the reference level has changed: the new mass tank and the base for comparison were not T-72A / B, as before, but the base T-72B3 - in the middle of 2016 they were already released about 1000 pieces. "
                      1. Mike2388
                        Mike2388 April 7 2017 00: 30
                        0
                        Did anyone else know about the tank crisis for 2014? More like an excuse. The army had 350 T-90 / T-90A, another 200 units in storage and 450 T-80BV and T-80U, (3000 T-80B, T-80BV, T-80U in storage). I do not see a crisis here if the T-90s are in storage. In addition, the army has 1100 T-72B and T-72BA and 7000 T-72, T-72A and T-72B in storage without taking into account the modifications of the 3 B2014 1000 + 32 new B3 units. So they have so far redone only 9 of the fleet 72 and the base is still T-72 modifications, A, B and BA and not B3. Releasing B3 2014 for only 3 years, they finally caught on and stopped ripping crap. "Cool" modification. Machines on the conveyor stand for 5-7 years. More like an obser rather than a crisis.
  12. pepel79
    pepel79 April 6 2017 12: 19
    0
    Given the complete removal of the jet from the RPG-26 (penetration 460 mm. + 50 mm. (Approximately ... to destroy the internal units and the crew itself)), taking into account the side of the tank turret 70-85 mm., The resistance to single-block cumulative ammunition will increase by compared with the base model up to 600 mm ... this is an indicator ...
  13. pepel79
    pepel79 April 6 2017 12: 25
    0
    Quote: Brod9iga25
    If you click on the link to the source of the material, you’ll read that the reactive armor is installed in the so-called soft case, I think due to the fact that these units are installed in the back of the turret, this is a goal that would not damage rear infantry.,
    1. pepel79
      pepel79 April 6 2017 12: 30
      0
      type of protection bmpt terminator?
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. pepel79
    pepel79 April 6 2017 12: 36
    0
    Quote: pepel79
    Given the complete removal of the jet from the RPG-26 (penetration 460 mm. + 50 mm. (Approximately ... to destroy the internal units and the crew itself)), taking into account the side of the tank turret 70-85 mm., The resistance to single-block cumulative ammunition will increase by compared with the base model up to 600 mm ... this is an indicator ...


    This is me about the additional protection described above ...
  16. Shark Lover
    Shark Lover April 6 2017 14: 26
    +6
    And I remember T 72, I don’t know what modification, Soviet still, in the year 90, probably. Himself not a tanker, it so happened, room 1 of the reconnaissance company in the ORB. In the company, a tank platoon, a battalion had already been castrated (times went back then), the t-62s were in service, and there were no tankers. An order came to rearm on the t-72. 62 = e were removed from storage and marching for loading, about 150 km, by levers and two soldiers, mechanized water vehicles BMP. We got all three! Through two passes, the only one, the thumb on my right hand quickly knocked out, stuck in the 1st, sometimes the back one, and a little repair on the way, we repaired it with a nail, the cotter pin flew out on the pull.
    Then get the 72nd, on the basis of storage, 300 kilometers of march. Himself for leverage and go. One word is THING !!! So I parted, a tank road along the Kazakhstan route, loaded scows, Kamazs, they just sniffed the dust behind me, poor Kazakh drivers, then we went in formation, looked at this miracle.
    He heated a couple of times, the water from the canal and the bucket, on the radiator shutters, from the fans, the fountain and could not understand how the fuel tanks switch. By the way, then he loaded them with shells, nothing, a book between the hatches on the tower and forward, everything was loaded. The only thing in the park, when loading, was putting the car with a gun in the mountains, you never know, I’ll press it in the wrong direction, it’s banging again)))). That's how I met BAT)))
  17. proud
    proud April 6 2017 17: 59
    0
    Nice to see!
  18. zloybond
    zloybond April 6 2017 18: 49
    0
    Every year, thousands of soldiers are engaged in exotic activities - they train the Prussian step ....... every year a lot of time is killed instead of useful training grounds for crushing paving stones, developing motor resources, step training, gymnastics, tank ballets ...
    You just need an annual march in Europe. We drove, aired, recalled the fate of the fascist homosexuals to the new euro homosexuals. And again, a year at firing ranges and firing. Again, again on May 9, a march in Europe .... And
    all this ....... HZ.
  19. Stabilization
    Stabilization April 7 2017 08: 22
    0
    Mike2388,
    Well, that is, do you think that your speculation is somehow better than the rest? And what is the reason for this?))