Military Review

The war of the USA and England against Europe and Russia for absolute power on the planet

73
The war of the USA and England against Europe and Russia for absolute power on the planet

100 years ago, 6 April 1917, the United States declared war on Germany and entered World War I. Before that, they remained neutral. The entry into the war of a power with a powerful economy, with enormous resources, capable of forming and maintaining a large army and navy, not exhausted by many years of struggle, promised to finally create an advantage in favor of the Entente, so it happened. In addition, the US entry into the war allowed the Entente to calmly endure the fact of actual, and then officially, exit from the war of Russia, engulfed in turmoil.


The United States entered the war at an extremely convenient time. Germany and the bloc of the Central Powers were already exhausted by a long war, their troops lost their former strike power. In addition, it took time to transport troops and weapons overseas, that is, the Americans could not actively participate in the most serious battles of the 1917 campaign of the year. American troops entered the battle only in the fall and suffered much less casualties than the main powers of the Entente. At the same time, the United States was able to share the “skin of the German bear” and its allies, dictate its will to weakened allies, creating the American order on the planet. And during the war, even before entering the fighting, the American clans of the "golden elite" (financial international) were fabulously rich. The United States was at the beginning of World War I, the debtor, and during the war became the main world creditor, receiving the main streams of gold from the warring powers.

It is also worth remembering that The First World War is a war of the USA, Great Britain and France against Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary. Russia was formally an ally of England and France, their "cannon fodder." But in reality, the masters of England and the United States initially planned the war in such a way as to simultaneously solve several global tasks:

1) destabilize, destroy and crush the Great Russia. The masters of the West decided by 1914 for the year that sufficient funds had been accumulated for the final solution of the “Russian question”, all forces were prepared, both outside Russia and within it, taking into account the experience of the Russo-Japanese War and the 1905-1907 Revolution. The masters of the West wanted to destroy Russian civilization as a global competitor who could create an alternative, fairer model of world order. In addition, the West needed the immense territories and resources of Russia to build its world order.

2) destroy the last national aristocratic Aryan empires - Russian, German and Austro-Hungarian, built on similar principles Ottoman empire, which prevented the owners of the West (financial international) to build a new world order - "liberal-democratic", the capitalist world (in fact, global slave civilization). To do this, they poisoned Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia and France on the continent, so that they would be destroyed by the results of the war and could not oppose the plans of the “masons-architects”. In fact, it was the war of the masters of England and the USA against Europe and Russia for absolute power on the planet, the power to parasitize freely on the body of humanity. The masters of England and the USA were going to destroy the Russian civilization and the superethnos of the Rus - the main and most dangerous rival on the planet, the carrier of the “Russian matrix” - an alternative fair model of the global world order;

3) it was necessary to destroy thoroughly destroy Europe, to deliver a powerful blow to the Anglo-Saxon competitors - the old Roman-German elites. Britain and the United States became the leaders of the Western project, subjugated continental Europe. At the same time, the United States was planning to get ahead and take the place of the “senior partner” in the bond America - Britain.

Thus, the First World War unleashed by England and the United States was based on a scenario prepared in advance in London and Washington (New York City). The masters of the West carried out their plan - by 1917, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, France and Russia were drained of blood. The most powerful competitors of the Anglo-Saxons - Germany and Russia, destroyed each other in a mutual slaughter. Russia in February-March, 1917, collapsed in turmoil, the Russian autocracy, greatly interfering with the Western masons, fell. Financial International based in England and the United States reassigned Eurasian banking clan houses. Financial, gold flows, plus refugees - labor and engineering, intellectual personnel (for example, Igor Sikorsky - the creator of the helicopter, Vladimir Zvorykin - became one of the inventors of modern television) rushed to the United States, turning America into a global creditor and industrial, technological center of the planet. National power in Germany, Austria-Hungary and Turkey was on the eve of the collapse, and these territories could soon be thoroughly robbed and subjugated to London and Washington. Preparing a revolution in Germany. Therefore, Washington decided it was time to go to war. There is practically no chance of much overthrowing from Germany, the victory is close, soon it will be time to divide the skins of the vanquished.

American troops have fought since October 1917 on the Western Front and since July 1918 on the Italian Front. During the war, more than 4 million people were called up for military service. The USA lost more than 117 thousand people in the First World War.

Casus belli

The United States closely followed the course of the war, well enriched in the supply of the Entente and partly Germany. However, in general, material and financial support was in favor of the Entente. By 1917, the US hosts decided it was time. At first, neutral tendencies prevailed in public opinion. They say it is not our war, the business of Europeans. But then gradually public opinion was skillfully handled in the anti-German way. Especially used underwater war, which led Germany.

So, especially the great noise caused the death of a huge steamer "Lusitania" in May 1915. The ocean liner was torpedoed by a German submarine. Killed more than a thousand people, including more than a hundred Americans. This attack, possibly provoked and prepared by the British special services with the aim of demonizing Germany and processing the American public opinion in the right direction, had serious consequences. The general opinion of Americans was expressed by former US President Theodore Roosevelt, who compared the actions of the German fleet with “piracy superior to any murder ever committed in the old pirate era” and called for action in the name of maintaining national dignity. A propaganda campaign was launched in Great Britain and the United States on the barbarism of German submariners and the German people as a whole.

Therefore, at the beginning of 1917, anti-German sentiment in American society already prevailed. And when Germany at the end of January 1917 resumed an unlimited submarine war, the corresponding sentiments in the United States were already prepared. It is not surprising that when the German Prime Minister Theobald von Betman-Golweg found out about this decision, he declared: “With Germany it is now over,” anticipating the imminent imminent entry into the US war. The US government has repeatedly warned Germany that it will regard attacks on its ships as an act of aggression. February 3 from Berlin was recalled by the American ambassador Gerard. On the same day, US President Woodrow Wilson asked the Senate for "permission to use all means that may be necessary to protect American ships and citizens in their peaceful activities."

Soon the United States received another reason to join the war. On January 16, German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmerman sent an encrypted telegram to the German Ambassador to Mexico, Heinrich Eckhard. It said: “We [Germany] intend to start a merciless submarine war with February 1. In spite of everything, we will try to keep the United States in a state of neutrality. However, in the event of failure, we will offer Mexico: to wage war together and to make peace together. For our part, we will provide Mexico with financial assistance and assure that at the end of the war she will receive back the territories of Texas, New Mexico and Arizona that she lost. We entrust you to work out the details of this agreement. You will immediately and top-secretly warn President [Mexico] Carranza as soon as the declaration of war between us and the United States becomes a fait accompli. Add that the president of Mexico can, on his own initiative, inform the Japanese ambassador that it would be very beneficial for Japan to join our union immediately. Pay the president’s attention to the fact that we will continue to make full use of our submarine forces, which will force England to sign the world in the coming months. ”

Thus, Germany offered to conclude an alliance with Mexico, promising it in case of victory the southern territories of the United States. The British intercepted decrypted this telegram, its text was transmitted to the representatives of the United States, which became the official reason for declaring war on Germany. As the British historian Neil Grant noted: "Zimmerman's telegram provided evidence of Germany’s hostility towards the United States, which, as President Wilson often repeated, was necessary for him to make a decision to declare war."

1 March The text of a hostile US telegram was published in American newspapers. On the same day, the US Congress made a decision on the arming of merchant ships to counter the "unlimited submarine war", which Germany announced. US President Woodrow Wilson raised before Congress the issue of declaring war on Germany on 2 in April and on April 6 received agreement. Wilson concluded his appeal to Congress with the following words: “Staying neutral is no longer possible when the world’s world and the freedom of the world are at stake. So, we are forced to take the fight with the natural enemy of peace and freedom. We will sacrifice for this our life, our condition, all that we have, in the proud consciousness that the day has finally come when America can shed its blood for the noble principles from which it originated. ”

That is, the owners of the United States once again covered their criminal and predatory goals "in battle with the natural enemy of peace and freedom." All their imperialist and predatory wars in the XX - early XXI centuries. The USA covered with similar slogans. They say that the “empire of good” sacrifices its blood for the “noble principles of democracy and freedom”, while the ungrateful still have the audacity to be outraged.
Author:
Articles from this series:
1917 Campaign

The transition of the Central Powers to a strategic defense
Entente plans for 1917 year: bet on a decisive victory in the war
Russian army to the beginning of the 1917 campaign of the year: the approach of the general collapse
Attack without shot: Mitav operation
How Germany began the unlimited submarine war
German submarine vs UK
How the German submarine fleet tried to crush the "mistress of the seas"
The United States used the myth of "inhuman" submarine warfare to oppose Germany
Caucasian front in 1917 year. Baratov corps offensive in southwestern Persia
Mosul operation. How the British, until recently, tried to use the Russian "cannon fodder"
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Maegrom
    Maegrom April 6 2017 07: 06
    +5
    I like to read such articles in the morning, recalls the assertion that the pen and weight will fall from the Leaning Tower of Pisa at the same time on the basis that the author has not yet passed anything except the acceleration of gravity in physics. (At the beginning of the article) And the statement that g is different (at the end) based on the same experience.
    The fact that the United States plays on itself (like any other country in the world) at the beginning and then as allies, forgetting about its own risks and the described difficulties in transferring the US army, by all means remove Russia from the game - immediately later in the text.
    1. V.ic
      V.ic April 6 2017 07: 40
      +3
      Quote: Maegrom
      Recalls statement that a feather and a weight will fall from the Leaning Tower of Pisa at the same time

      In an airless space it will be so. Build an object with a similar height on the moon and simultaneously drop a feather and a weight and taikonauts will confirm this statement. Consider comparing 1 kg of cotton wool and 1 kg of cast iron in gradations greater / equal / less ... lol
      1. Maegrom
        Maegrom April 7 2017 06: 44
        0
        So I’m talking about that - the thesis of the article only works on a spherical horse in a vacuum. The effect is "analyzed" in isolation, while in not all cases it can be objectively determining, and the conclusions are disseminated ignoring obvious errors.
    2. cost
      cost April 6 2017 09: 53
      11
      Another alternative story. Gleboa and Nosovsky smoke nonsense aside.
      1. venaya
        venaya April 6 2017 10: 03
        +1
        Quote: Rich
        Another alternative story.

        And in the case, that is, in the text of the article, are there any specific complaints, or are you just suggesting that you step on the same rake endlessly? Really open your eyes to the true customers, financiers and organizers of all these world wars is not so nice. Does it hurt my eyes?
        1. cost
          cost April 6 2017 10: 09
          +6
          I am very happy for you that this article opened your eyes to history. Each scribble has its own reader.
          1. venaya
            venaya April 6 2017 10: 19
            0
            What is written in this article, I myself write constantly, just really familiar with this topic. Therefore, I personally wish that this article did NOT open your eyes to the true story, without embellishment and the usual endless total lie.
            1. kalibr
              kalibr April 6 2017 15: 27
              +5
              "The masters of the West wanted to destroy Russian civilization as a global competitor that could create an alternative, fairer model of world order."

              This phrase is especially impressive. The country is a centuries-old monarchy, with relatives in all the ruling houses of Europe. With men in bast shoes ... Buying from them almost everything ... And so they decide that she can create a fairer model of the world order? They probably have a secret chronovisor created by N. Tesla. They looked into it and ... found out about what happened in the future! But he had limited actions and didn’t do it until 1991, and even more so until 2017. Tesla made a weak device !!!
              1. venaya
                venaya April 6 2017 15: 55
                +1
                Quote: kalibr
                The country is a centuries-old monarchy, with relatives in all the ruling houses of Europe.

                And why, some monarchs in Europe actually rule "their" countries, or simply "fool around", pretending to be some ruling houses? Life went far ahead, the monarchs, except for the heads of the Austro-Hungarian, German and Russian empires and the Ottoman, to some extent, really had the ability to somehow rule. It was these idiots who were put in their place by more influential banking structures that have significantly more real economic power than any of the listed monarchs.
                1. kalibr
                  kalibr April 6 2017 20: 49
                  +1
                  That is, they knew in advance that Russia is capable of this, believed in it and decided to risk capital? Looked at the chronovisor, huh?
                  And don’t write “Che” - even students from distant villages don’t write or say that to me. However, to whom am I writing something. Sorry, I forgot, paranoia is not treated in Russia.
              2. V.ic
                V.ic April 6 2017 17: 32
                +1
                Quote: kalibr
                They probably have a secret chronovisor created by N. Tesla. They looked into it and ... found out about what happened in the future! But he had limited actions and until 1991 he did not drift, and even until 2017, even more so. Tesla made a weak device !!!

                Again dabbled in mushrooms? Tie it up!
                1. kalibr
                  kalibr April 6 2017 20: 50
                  +1
                  This is not for me to advise, but to the authors of such opuses!
                  1. V.ic
                    V.ic April 7 2017 10: 44
                    0
                    Quote: kalibr
                    This is not for me to advise, but to the authors of such opuses!

                    In the "opus" there was no such hypothesis. The idea = yours, the responsibility for spreading is also on you. lol
        2. 27091965
          27091965 April 6 2017 12: 23
          +3
          Quote: venaya
          And in the case, that is, in the text of the article are there any specific claims


          It seems to me that it is not worth uniting England and the USA, each of them had their own goals. The Americans planned to take first place among the Navy of other countries. It is clear that England was their main rival. Therefore, they considered 1MB as a tool to achieve their goals.

          «We need to start building ships of the largest available displacement, we can withstand all the financial burdens that arise with this. England and other countries should follow our example or abandon competition with us. We must make the construction of the fleet as expensive as possible. We have more money than any other country and we will have even more money by the end of the war, when most countries will go bankrupt. In no other way can we get the world's first fleet and surpass England. Money is power if used properly. We have more money than any other country. Let's use this."US Senate June 20, 1916.
          1. jumbo
            jumbo April 6 2017 16: 37
            +1
            It would be more correct to name the main rival of the United States at that time Germany, and in the future, Russia. England during WWI is still more an ally for the United States than a rival. But after the WWII, when Germany and Russia were withdrawn what is called “out of brackets”, the turn of Great Britain came. The Washington Maritime Agreement of 1922 is a vivid confirmation of this.
            1. 27091965
              27091965 April 6 2017 18: 31
              0
              It would be more correct to name the main rival of the United States at that time Germany, and in the future, Russia. England during WWI is still more an ally for the United States than a rival.


              I think no. The open door policy in China led to an attempt by the United States in 1909-1910 to create an international consortium for the construction of railways in China. Against this were France, England, Japan and Russia, only Germany supported the United States. The idea failed, the United States did not give a loan to China in the amount of $ 50 million to reorganize its financial system, the “group of comrades” mentioned above again opposed it, moreover, Japan and Russia concluded an agreement on joint protection of their interests in Manchuria and China. In essence, this agreement was against the economic expansion of the United States.
              In 1912, the Americans in the Senate voiced the idea of ​​creating a new fleet for supremacy in the world's oceans, but rejected this idea.
              In 1916, making money on military supplies, the Americans adopted a new program for the development of the US Navy, they already had enough money for this. So that they didn’t feel “warm” feelings for anyone.
              1. jumbo
                jumbo April 6 2017 22: 09
                0
                The only thing I can agree with you is that they, (USA), didn’t have warm feelings for anyone either then or now. And again, according to your version, in this particular case, Germany was on the side The United States in 1909-1910, why in this case the United States joined the WWI on the side of France, England, Japan and Russia? If you accept your version that England is the main rival of the United States, then it would be more logical for them, the United States, to join the WWI on the side of Germany.
                1. 27091965
                  27091965 April 6 2017 22: 59
                  0
                  And again, according to your version, in this particular case, Germany was on the side of the United States in 1909-1910, why, then, did the United States join the WWI on the side of France, England, Japan and Russia?


                  This is not my version. There is a book "America in the struggle for China", it has a section where the relations in the Far East are very well described before the WWII between the countries you mentioned.
                  Join the side of Germany in the war? It seems to me that the Americans understood that Germany could not win, economic opportunities were not comparable. For them, the main thing was to get the maximum benefits from this war.
                  1. jumbo
                    jumbo April 6 2017 23: 19
                    +1
                    "these countries" were not mentioned by me, but by you, and it was naturally not handy to join the United States on the side of Germany, because this country at that time was the second industrialized power after the United States, and successfully drove the states out of the European market, and not only from the European, despite the fact that Germany did not have extensive colonies, if we compare it with the same Great Britain or France.
                    1. ukoft
                      ukoft April 7 2017 06: 48
                      +1
                      At the beginning of the 20th century, Germany’s economic growth was no longer the same. Slowed down. The effect of the merger has passed. We needed profits. They wanted to get growth due to access to the colonies; they also wanted places in the sun. The Americans also wanted a place in the sun, access to the colonies of England and France. So it is quite possible that they would give them away. But they did not need to get a hegemon in Europe. And so, economic growth in the USA was good at that time. The model has not yet developed
                    2. ukoft
                      ukoft April 7 2017 06: 51
                      0
                      By the way, if anyone thinks that the colonies gained independence in large numbers after the WWII due to some awakening, this is a mistake. Metropolis lost its monopoly on access to the markets of the colonies. So they sent them to free swimming. And no Gandhi with his non-violent approaches would help otherwise
                    3. 27091965
                      27091965 April 7 2017 08: 05
                      0
                      and joining the United States on the side of Germany was naturally not handy, because this country at that time was the second industrialized power after the USA, and successfully drove the states from the European market, and not only from the European,


                      “German import (import) of 11,6 billion, export (export) of 10,9 billion for 1913” is a bit strange figures for the second industrial power.

                      “With the numerical predominance of Anglo-Americans, who occupy almost all government posts in the United States, this is likely to induce sympathy in the war between Germany and England to the English side.” Bernhard von Bülow.

                      The European market at that time had protection in the form of duties, and not only Germany replaced the USA from the Chinese market.
    3. Dart2027
      Dart2027 April 8 2017 10: 26
      0
      Quote: Maegrom
      and how the allies, forgetting about their own risks and the described difficulties in the transfer of the US army, by all means take Russia out of the game

      And what did they risk? Germany was already physically unable to win before the fresh forces arrived from the USA. Losses at the front? So those who determine politics themselves do not fight, but they always spat on ordinary people.
  2. parusnik
    parusnik April 6 2017 07: 22
    +9
    destroy the last national aristocratic Aryan empires
    ... Already, a tear struck ... laughing.. It turns out .. we Aryans, popular aristocrats ... So that's where the dog rummaged .. laughing
    1. kalibr
      kalibr April 6 2017 15: 31
      +5
      "People's aristocratic empires" is generally a pearl. It is customary to write in dissertations: the author introduces new documents into scientific circulation .... (list attached). And here the author introduces a new “scientific term” of global significance and is still not a doctor of sciences (assigned without protection!) And not in a psychiatric hospital. You need to be able to do this.
  3. Olgovich
    Olgovich April 6 2017 07: 59
    12
    It is also worth remembering that the First World War is a war. USA, UK and France v. Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary.

    This, in my opinion, no one has claimed. With such statements it is necessary to go to the WORLD level. lol
    in reality, the owners of England and the USA initially planned the war in such a way as to simultaneously solve several global problems:
    1) destabilize, destroy and crush for themselves Great Russia.

    DOCUMENTS, author, documents, witnesses, notes, memoirs of participants, meeting places -announce. In addition to their visions.
    By the way, if Russia was already Great, what kind of Leaders of All Leaders did they build? belay Even greater? Or just restored? recourse request
    Russia was formally an ally of England and France, their “cannon fodder”.

    Cannon meat turned out to be French and British.
    The most powerful competitors of the Anglo-Saxons - Germany and Russia, destroyed each other in a mutual slaughter.
    I did not understand, but what about:
    this is the war [b] of the USA, Great Britain and France against Russia, Germany
    request

    In general, an amusing article from parallel "reality", for which the article is, of course, "+" good
    1. venaya
      venaya April 6 2017 08: 56
      +7
      Quote: Olgovich
      The most powerful competitors of the Anglo-Saxons - Germany and Russia, destroyed each other in a mutual slaughter.
      I did not understand, but what about:
      this is the war [b] of the USA, Great Britain and France against Russia, Germany

      I didn’t sing either, what exactly didn’t you understand here? Indeed, in order to defeat the enemy or better enemies it is economically more profitable not to fight them, but simply to pit them with each other. This is standard practice, do you really need to present similar examples here both at other times and in other places. It’s always expensive to fight by ourselves, and to bribe the top (“elite”) is always economically much cheaper. The article is quite rightly written, accurate and consistent. Another thing is that someone may seem overly confident, because this is more likely from the insufficient competence of some readers who are not very familiar with this particular topic. The article is unambiguous (+). To whom it is not understood or seems unfair, it is always possible to discuss and clarify individual emerging clarity.
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich April 6 2017 09: 10
        +7
        Quote: venaya
        o Bleed them with each other.

        Bleed-wild unreasonable animals. Gosudartsva, especially the larger ones, act on the basis of their interests.
        Quote: venaya
        do you really need to show similar examples

        I need to present documents, witnesses, notes, memoirs of participants, meeting places - these "conspiracies", and not give ALREADY what happened beforehand planned.
        Quote: venaya
        Another thing is that someone may seem overly confident, so this is more likely from lack of competence some readers

        Many doctors of science "do not have enough" competence to understand these .. gm .. visions:
        This is the war of the USA, Great Britain and France against Russia,

        If some .. readers have enough imagination to plunge into the parallel world of the author - this is interesting, but nothing more.
        Quote: venaya
        The article is unambiguous (+).

        So I article plus set very amusingly lol
        1. V.ic
          V.ic April 6 2017 09: 38
          +6
          Quote: Olgovich
          I need to present documents, witnesses, notes, memoirs of participants, meeting places -

          To begin, present yourself a certificate that they did not contact a psychiatrist ...
          1. Alex_1973
            Alex_1973 April 6 2017 10: 23
            +8
            V.ic Today, 09:38 ↑ New
            To begin, present yourself a certificate that they did not contact a psychiatrist ...
            Victor hi , I beg you, and there’s nowhere to put any stigma on it ... There, for a long time, the last vestiges of the mind have nibbled on Shiz.
            And the article is quite robust, if you omit the minor nuances. All right, the arrogant Saxons have striated their empires according to the ancient Roman principle of "divide et impera" - divide and conquer.
            Pay attention to when the United States entered into both world wars ...? Right at the very end, in order to have time to grab the most delicious piece of cake. In a word, universal jackals are scavengers.
            1. Olgovich
              Olgovich April 6 2017 10: 56
              +3
              Quote: Alex_1973
              Victor, I beg you, but there’s nowhere to put any stigma on it ... There, for a long time, the last vestiges of the mind have eaten the shiz.


              You, comrade NONE, can you refute something from my comment? No. Those. You-a man who cannot.
              Sorry.....
              1. Alex_1973
                Alex_1973 April 6 2017 11: 54
                +6
                Olgovich Today, 10: 56 ↑
                I sympathize ..... You, comrade NONE
                I feel sorry for myself, "comrade XTO" ... laughing
                can you refute something from my comment?
                To refute your nonsense I do not even see the point; arguing with you is like proving to a psycho that he is a psycho and not a doctor.
                Those. You are a man who cannot.
                Did you check, or did you keep a candle in my bedroom? Fucking sex therapist ... laughing negative
                1. Olgovich
                  Olgovich April 6 2017 12: 28
                  +3
                  Quote: Alex_1973
                  Sympathize with yourself

                  You need it, because it is you who are insolvent.
                  Quote: Alex_1973
                  To refute your nonsense I do not even see the point; arguing with you is like proving to a psycho that he is a psycho and not a doctor.

                  You can NOT., I.e. a man who cannot. Think, refute, prove.
                  Quote: Alex_1973
                  Did you check, or did you keep a candle in my bedroom? .

                  No, of course: I just read your comments-this enough yes
            2. Warrior with machine gun
              Warrior with machine gun April 6 2017 12: 50
              +6
              only now the Japanese trick into the Second forced to get into earlier than the First, and the fact that the vultures of a planetary scale is a fact, and all their activities to this day confirm this.
          2. Olgovich
            Olgovich April 6 2017 10: 50
            +4
            Quote: V.ic
            Quote: Olgovich

            For a start present yourself a certificate that they did not contact a psychiatrist ...


            Good (what knowledge of the procedures you have)! But you provide a certificate from a psychiatrist that already passed a course of treatment. And most importantly, the course worked. And then, judging by the comments to the ARTICLE and to the comments, alas, he was unsuccessful .. request

            PS "Interesting" you have comments, "substantial", and most importantly, on the topic of the article. fool
        2. venaya
          venaya April 6 2017 09: 41
          +3
          Quote: Olgovich
          Bleed - wild unreasonable animals. States, especially large ones, act on the basis of their interests.
          I need to present documents, witnesses, notes, memoirs of the participants, meeting places - these "conspiracies", and not to give out what happened ALREADY in advance.

          Yes, you are just an idealist. You want everything at once, this does not occur in practice. It is recalled that when killing only pres. A. Lincoln to the next world more than 120 people went after him, I note that while no one was able to leave any documents talking about the true customers of this crime. I am talking about "covering the tracks." Is it really not clear? The situation is quite similar in the organization of wars, especially World Wars. Instead of your own analysis of events, you are here demanding documents and still apparently certified by the Lord God himself. Do you really not notice that your requirements are not competent. Although, lately, the information about what A. Samsonov writes here has accumulated more than enough, I personally liked the info about the tasks and results of this war, which was issued even before the war by Pan Pilsutsky, even before the war. This info can be found. So I do not accept your claims to the article, I consider them clearly tendentious.
          1. Army soldier2
            Army soldier2 April 6 2017 10: 11
            +3
            A conspiracy to kill and a world war are not comparable things. Any war "reserves" the plans, directives, orders, minutes of meetings. As an example: our "friends" in the West argue that Germany was only ahead of the USSR in the attack. However, they have the Barbarossa offensive plan, and we have the defensive cover plan.
            Did you notice that there are always no references to the source in Mr. Samsonov? Therefore, this is his personal free discussion on the topic.
            1. venaya
              venaya April 6 2017 11: 01
              +1
              The material presented in this article is by no means "his personal free discourse on“But it’s really quite widespread in the scientific community. You declare that“ Mr. Samsonov always has no references to the sources ”- I do not agree, he refers to the opinions of the most respected specialists specializing in this topic, by the way I’m personally acquainted with some of them and I confirm the accuracy of the information provided.Another thing, and in that you are right, this information is really not so easy to find, so this has its own logic: this information is very unpleasant for financial circles, who actually they are becoming the mainstream media (up to 99% of the media are in their hands). So efforts to confirm this information are really small, and this is the main problem: we didn’t accidentally put the mainstream media in the wrong hands, for some reason we want what It’s not possible to figure it out. It really needs its own efforts and not small ones. As for the links, so here the journalist V. Shpakovsky will pile this crap in bulk, there’s no sense in it, just one zombie. This is not a sufficient condition for obtaining reliable information, it should be recognized.
              1. kalibr
                kalibr April 6 2017 15: 41
                +1
                Quote: venaya
                This is not a sufficient condition for obtaining reliable information, it should be recognized.

                A sufficient condition is personal contacts with "respected people." And there, over a glass of tea, revelations are made. But to relate such people to the archive is bad manners. If only a reference. But no, everything has been rewritten. Everything is falsified. There was only one genius of the spirit, which allows the inhuman effort of will to see the secrets of history. And there are, there are people who can. And some are especially active in the spring. Why's that?
                1. venaya
                  venaya April 6 2017 20: 01
                  +1
                  Quote: kalibr
                  such a people relate to the archive on the archive If only a reference. But no, everything has been rewritten. Everything is falsified.

                  I’d like to find out exactly which bastard does all of this: cleans up archives, burns not orthodox researchers at the stake, forbids them from doing their favorite work if some forces don’t like the studies that they produce, excommunicate students. Still list all the possible measures of "taming the obstinate"? I recall how many of the work the authors did not venture to publish, while outstanding scientists were informed about these works, by the way it happened before my eyes, but it turns out that I myself witnessed scientific reports that did not receive wide coverage, that is, only for specialists. You do not know that not all materials are available to the general public? I am surprised. Can you recall whose money was issued and is still being published "our" textbooks?
                  1. kalibr
                    kalibr April 6 2017 20: 37
                    +1
                    Quote: venaya
                    Can you recall whose money was issued and is still being published "our" textbooks?

                    I know for sure which mine were released. Do you know everything? So maybe you are Dr. Nou?
            2. kalibr
              kalibr April 6 2017 15: 44
              0
              "Have you noticed that Mr. Samsonov always has no references to the source?"
              There are people who think that giving links to anything ... indecent.
          2. Olgovich
            Olgovich April 6 2017 11: 05
            +6
            Quote: venaya
            Instead of your own analysis of events, you are here demanding documents and still apparently certified by the Lord God himself. Do you really not notice that your requirements are not competent.

            Loud statements claiming to be sensational without reliance on huge array of archival sourcesI listed them. And he is completely absent, emptiness. And This is the basis of the work of any historian, the processing of many archives, the mass of documents, the selection, and only then, the conclusions.
            If you had to read historical monographs of scientists, then there links take up almost more space than the text itself.
            .
            Quote: venaya
            So I do not accept your claims to the article, I consider them clearly tendentious.

            I do not see not a single doc of your innocence and that of the author and comments on my comment, DO NOT accept. hi
        3. jumbo
          jumbo April 6 2017 17: 09
          +1
          Well, it’s not a fact that states (even “large” ones) always act on the basis of “their interests”. And one more thing, "wild unreasonable animals" often behave smarter than humans (sorry for the tautology), and sometimes more humane. As for the topic of the article, I can offer a book by Sergei Kremlev: Russia and Germany: play !: From Versailles Wilhelm to Versailles Wilson: A new look at the old war. From the series "Great Confrontations".
    2. Curious
      Curious April 6 2017 12: 55
      +5
      Olgovich! I usually oppose you. But today I already agree with you twice. Such a creative and globally minded “interpreter of history” is sorely lacking for the current Ukrainian followers of Clio. I do not understand why the author does not go to the planetary level. Ukrainian science fiction historians would have accepted him with pleasure. Protoukry would play with other colors.
      But still I think that historical views should be placed in the "Opinion" section. Or create a special section.
    3. kalibr
      kalibr April 6 2017 15: 32
      +1
      It would be more correct to write Notes of a Madman.
  4. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh April 6 2017 08: 30
    +6
    "The First World War is the war of the USA, Great Britain and France against Russia,
    Germany and Austria-Hungary "////

    To go nuts: Brusilov turns out to be the thugs of the English-French! The Russian guard suffered
    defeat from the Americans!

    And why then spare the Second World War? Continue:

    "The Second World War is the war of the USA, Great Britain and France against Russia,
    Germany and Austria-Hungary
    "The Wehrmacht and the Red Army defend Stalingrad from the last forces from rushing towards the Volga
    Anglo-Franco-American hordes. "

    For the third year now I have been saying what is happening in Russia: unprecedented correspondence of history.
    Soviet historians simply kept silent about facts that were not linked to ideological concepts
    Marxism and the line of the Party. Putin's - they come up with a story on the go, easily, effortlessly, "without a snack" ...
    1. venaya
      venaya April 6 2017 09: 08
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Soviet historians simply kept silent about facts that were not linked to the ideological concepts of Marxism and the Party line. Putin's - they come up with a story on the go, easily, effortlessly, "without a snack" ...

      To really understand this cesspool, the "Augean stables" which is a modern "history" - it is necessary to really carefully study all the information available today and there is nothing to hush up, otherwise there will be no luck in this matter.
    2. Olgovich
      Olgovich April 6 2017 09: 15
      +4
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Putin's - they come up with a story on the go, easily, effortlessly, "without a snack" ...

      I put you a plus, because I agree, basically.
      But what does the PUTIN historians have to do with it? But what relation is this fantasy composition has to history and Putin?
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh April 6 2017 11: 12
        +2
        Well, getting better, it's my fault: NOT Putin's historians, but "pseudo-historians of the Putin era."
        (Putin does not initiate such opuses, that's for sure).
        What is their calculation: now absolutely everything is stored on Google servers. Any dregs
        gains immortality. Therefore, any nonsense on a polar resource (like VO), especially
        bold (and people today only read 1) the headline 2) the first line
        3) highlighted in bold 4) the last line) - crashes into the memory of such
        "Internet readers."
        That is, it is a "leaflet" - effective propaganda.
        1. venaya
          venaya April 6 2017 11: 46
          +3
          Quote: voyaka uh
          any nonsense on a popular resource (like VO)

          I personally especially liked your personal nonsense about a certain genetic connection between the founder of the Frankish tribe, Prince Meroving and Louis (xx), belonging to the Spanish-French Bourbon dynasty (Spain was captured by the Arabs and the top authorities because of Arabian origin). This is not just nonsense, but the most skilled hutspa. And one must guess that they can be connected with the unimaginable family ties of the Russian speakers, and having a purely Russian religion, the "Druids", which are also widespread in the Great Russian Plain. The genetics of all Merovingians and their direct descendants has been sufficiently studied how to demonstrate the representative of the Bourbons, one of the Spanish branches of descendants of Charlemagne, the very one who just killed the last of the Merovingians and subjugated the "Empire of the Franks" and transformed it into a "great Roman Empire", accordingly, together with the dynasty, the state language itself was also replaced from Russian into Latin.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh April 6 2017 11: 54
            +2
            "I personally liked your personal nonsense about a certain genetic connection between the founder of the tribe" ///

            Genetic communication ??? belay
            Is this when I joked about Louis’s long nose? Type "Jewish snobel"? laughing
    3. V.ic
      V.ic April 6 2017 10: 55
      +3
      Quote: voyaka uh
      For the third year now I have been saying what is happening in Russia: unprecedented correspondence of history

      You should better deny Begin’s words: In his book “Revolution,” Begin wrote: “The massacre in Deir Yassin, along with its like, helped us clear the territory of 650 thousand Arabs. If there had not been this battle, there would have been no “Israel” http://shguno.livejournal.com/169024.html
  5. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy April 6 2017 09: 42
    +2
    The stream of consciousness is a plus. In another way, sorry, do not name.
    The First World War is a war of the USA, Great Britain and France against Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary.
    I wonder what Austria-Hungary did not please France or the United States?
    The masters of the West carried out their plan - by 1917 Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, France and Russia were bloodless.
    Mdya ... France went to wool, but was sheared. And England has almost lost its gold reserves increased?
    It’s closer to me: everyone played their game and everyone lost, except for the USA and Japan.
    Russia is still more right than everyone else! (And the allies .... whether they were with us?)
  6. Cartalon
    Cartalon April 6 2017 10: 02
    +2
    How could the author and his followers want to have absolute power over themselves? If this war were against Russia and Germany, what the hell did the British deploy a huge army in Europe and put an entire generation there, and not only workers and peasants.
    1. Svyatoslav
      Svyatoslav April 6 2017 18: 17
      +1
      What is the dispute, gentlemen, comrades and Others !! ??
      The fact that the gold of Russia from the moment it was transferred to the hands of bankers (then along the Essence in the Fed) rules the world? To prove this, I believe, no one here needs.
      All wars, from the chronicle to the chronicle izTorii, were racial. That's it ..., mixed up on pretexts and reasons with tales of the conquest of territories, resources, markets, gold. Racial wars against race, i.e. white people. The goal is to reduce the number of livestock, self-destroy, harden, turn into an obedient herd. Others themselves will die to a convenient number, then use these others as servants. Look for evidence in statistics and in life. Who needs this? This is a separate issue and is very, very, I will say - “slippery”.
      1. kalibr
        kalibr April 6 2017 20: 40
        +1
        Rules the world SPECTRUM. And James Bond and Samsonov are fighting with him. Now everyone knows this!
    2. kalibr
      kalibr April 6 2017 20: 45
      0
      Quote: Cartalon
      there is a whole generation, and by no means only workers and peasants.

      And why did the non-commissioned officer widow carve herself? Out of mischief!
  7. jumbo
    jumbo April 6 2017 18: 12
    +1
    You can certainly say that this is "crazy nonsense", and hang all sorts of labels, in the sense that the author is "not sane", but in fact, judging not biased, it is difficult to argue with the author. As for documentary evidence, there may also be a Julian Asange, or Edward Snowden, on this subject.
    1. Cartalon
      Cartalon April 6 2017 18: 27
      +2
      Of course, it’s difficult for the author to live in his personal reality. How to argue with him.
      1. jumbo
        jumbo April 6 2017 18: 38
        +1
        Once, for many, it was a big shock when they were told by some "madmen" that the Earth moves around the sun, although before that it was believed that the Earth rests on three pillars and the sun rotates around the Earth
        1. kalibr
          kalibr April 6 2017 20: 44
          +2
          Quote: Jumbo
          around the Earth

          Then they checked it. And here everything is sucked out of a finger and NOTHING is proved.
    2. kalibr
      kalibr April 6 2017 20: 41
      +2
      Quote: Jumbo
      then on this subject is possible

      That's when there is, then we’ll talk about it, and not guess on the coffee grounds, betraying paranoid nonsense as some kind of scientific revelation.
      1. jumbo
        jumbo April 6 2017 22: 17
        +1
        For some reason, I recalled an episode from the movie "The meeting place cannot be changed." - Well, do you bring a certificate from the MUR? )))
  8. Hantengri
    Hantengri April 6 2017 19: 53
    +2
    (After reading the comments) Good article! Effective! Well, what a gift of historical idiocy it is necessary to possess in order for monarchists and communists to merge in a single impulse, to hammer in Samsonov’s slipper and citizens of an alternative historical orientation who have joined it! lol
  9. kalibr
    kalibr April 6 2017 20: 52
    0
    Quote: Olgovich
    which, in my opinion, no one has ever claimed. With such statements it is necessary to go to the WORLD level.

    Right! I have just been sent an invitation to publish material in a scientific article in Norway. I can give the coordinates. Need to start somewhere? And everyone will notice such material at once!
    1. venaya
      venaya April 6 2017 21: 45
      0
      Quote: kalibr
      I have just been sent an invitation to publish material in a scientific article in Norway.

      So that's where the denyushki comes from! Indiscreet question - do you know how many words in the modern Norwegian language? What is the current level of development of science in this country? Such a scientific backwater, although not poorly financially secure - apparently this is your limit, the limit of yours "scientific"essays.
      1. kalibr
        kalibr April 7 2017 07: 56
        0
        The working language of international publications is English. There are invitations from other countries, Norway just caught ... as an example. Want to give an address to the States. There historical science is developed, right? Or to our academic collections? You will be able to subscribe to the newsletter and will be aware of all scientific conferences both in Russia and abroad. The only problem is that it is accepted there that the author pays for the publication. But they don’t pay him. Well, the limit of my scientific essays is Osprey in Great Britain and the Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation in Russia today.
    2. jumbo
      jumbo April 7 2017 00: 05
      +1
      I just didn’t know that Norway was a “great scientific power”))) Of course, the Norwegians have a high standard of living, but this is only because they “sit on the oil pipe” and the fact that the population is not large is only 5 million
      1. kalibr
        kalibr April 7 2017 07: 59
        0
        And why did you decide that she is a great scientific power? Conference collections are published in Poland, Slovenia (!), Bulgaria, Singapore, and all US universities. Please wherever you want. It was an example that scientific collections were published “even there”. Do you want to give the addresses of scientific conferences with us? Are we a great scientific power? Are you okay?
  10. ukoft
    ukoft April 6 2017 21: 57
    0
    Well, the United States would have anyway entered the war against Germany when the TV won. The hegemon in Europe is a potential contingent on a global scale that will be difficult to cope with, it is better with the warring and smaller France and England. As a refutation of the author’s version, I recall that the initiatives of the Americans after the end of World War I were buried by the French and the ENGLISH. These two powers had not yet weakened so much, after they had to organize the Second World War, and they merged. And so they did not learn the markets of the colonies of England and France for access to their goods and capital Natalya. As far as I remember, Wilson even left the conference ahead of time, as the above countries and Egor’s initiatives completely put him on it. Japan also intensified. The losers of this are Germany, Outer Ottomans and Russia. France and England received a feast of victory. With such losses in demography, economics, industry. Will the whole author answer this?
  11. ukoft
    ukoft April 6 2017 23: 28
    0
    And as for how simple people lived in Russia during tsarism, I advise you to read the link: http://voprosik.net/kak-zhila-russkaya-derevnya-p
    ri-care /
    They ate meat on great holidays and led a half-starved lifestyle. And this is the majority of the population. Plus, the Bolsheviks that they overcame their illiteracy, improved their fat and life, of course, probably from the height of the past years, they can be criticized for the bloody reforms and give examples, but most of the revolutions were bloody. That’s how humanity works
  12. Vladimir Alexandrov
    Vladimir Alexandrov 1 May 2017 21: 32
    0
    nuances of structureless management

    Why did Stalin give the cook the Hero of the Soviet Union?