Syria against the Palestinians. Israeli invasion of Lebanon

32
Syria against the Palestinians

Surprisingly, Arab Syria formally entered the Lebanese war at the call of the Maronite Christians. When the military advantage was on the side of the left-wing Muslim forces, they also turned to Syria for help (earlier Damascus supported the Muslims by sending Palestinian units based in Syria). The head of the Christian police squads, Bashir Gemayel, hoped that Syria would help him get rid of the actual occupation of Lebanon by the Palestinians. However, Damascus had its own plans for the Lebanese state. The Syrians, not without reason, considered a significant part of Lebanon historical part of their state. Also, the loss of the Golan Heights put Syria in an extremely disadvantageous military-strategic position in relation to Israel. The deployment of Syrian troops in Lebanon would make it possible to somewhat improve the balance of power between Syria and Israel. In addition, Hafez al-Assad did not want victory either of the left, the strengthening position of the Palestinians, or the right, planning to restore equilibrium in the country and the region as a whole.



The 12 thousandth Syrian corps entered Lebanon in April 1976. Intervention allowed Syria to become the country's main political force. Gradually, the Syrian military presence was increased to 30 thousands of people. Leaders of the Lebanese Christian community supported the actions of Syria and the Christians met the Syrian troops as liberators. The United States also did not oppose such intervention by Syria. Jumblatt’s desperate attempt to negotiate, through the mediation of the newly elected President of Lebanon, Elias Sarkis, about national reconciliation with Christians and a joint action against the Syrian forces did not lead to success. Jumblatt’s appeals to other Arab states and France to assist in the fight against the Syrian troops were also unsuccessful.

Syrian troops entered Lebanon and began to advance towards Beirut, lifting the blockade around the surrounding Christian villages. Fierce battles between Syrians and Palestinians took place. Syria was not stopped even by the numerous mediation efforts of various Arab countries, dissatisfied with the union of Damascus with Christians and the fighting of the Syrians against the PLO. 7 June Syrians attacked the Palestinian-controlled suburbs of Beirut. Palestinians are defeated. Palestinian militants abduct in Beirut, the American ambassador, the embassy counselor for the economy and the driver of the embassy. All abducted were executed. The US evacuates embassy personnel from Beirut.

Thus, the open intervention of Syria radically changed the situation in Lebanon. Falangist Christians launched a counterattack. A large-scale battle for Tal Zaatar begins - the largest Palestinian refugee camp in the Beirut district of Dekvane. About 15 thousand people lived in the camp, including the garrison of 2,5 thousand militants. The camp was originally located in the industrial zone, so by the beginning of the battle the Palestinians easily turned it into a real fortified area. 22 June 1976 began the siege of the camp, which lasted 2 month.

The main forces of the Christians were the formations of the Guardians of the Cedars (led by Etienne Sakr), the Tigers of Akhrar (Dani Chamoun), and El-Tanzim (George Advan). Total 2 thousand soldiers. The Palestinians sent troops from the south of the country, trying to break the blockade ring, but could not succeed. 29 Jun. Christian troops are taking by storm the small Palestinian camp Jisr Al-Bash, located near Tal Zaatar. 5 July Palestinians stormed the Christian cities of Kura and Cecca in northern Lebanon. Having removed part of the troops from the siege of Tal Zaatar, the Christians literally at the last moment manage to save the population of these cities from the massacre. The Palestinians, meanwhile, are moving their troops from the south of the country, but they are unable to break the blockade around Tal Zaatar.

8 July 1976. The Palestinians and their allies make another attempt to break through the blockade of the camp. Jumblatt's troops strike at Christians in the area of ​​the Beirut port and business city, while Palestinians are trying to break the ring around the camp. However, this attempt fails. July 13 Palestinian sniper from Tal Zaatara kills the Phalanx military wing leader William Xavi, who came to inspect his troops on the opposition line. As a result, the command of the Phalangist militia and the united Christian detachments is fully concentrated in the hands of Bashir Gemayel.

In mid-July - early August, with the support of the "Red Cross", the civilian population is evacuated from Tal Zaatar. Evacuation is accompanied by armed provocations on both sides. By early August, the Red Cross reported that 90% of the civilian population of the camp had been evacuated. Most of them are settled in the former Christian Damur. On August 6, the Phalangists took control of the Shiite district of Beirut Nabaa, through which the Palestinians are trying to break through from Tal Zaatar. They offer the enemy to capitulate to save the civilian population. Palestinians refuse. Arafat promises to turn Tal Zaatar into Stalingrad. 12 August after a fierce assault, Christians take the camp Tal Zaatar. Christian militants are taking revenge on Palestinians for the slaughter in Damur, they do not take prisoner either militants or civilians who remained: about 2 thousand people were killed and 4 thousand wounded. At the same time, Falangists with bulldozers are demolishing the camp in order to prevent its re-settlement by the Palestinians. In their cruelty, the sweep Tal Zaatara surpassed the massacre at Damur.

Syria against the Palestinians. Israeli invasion of Lebanon


Fights in Tal Zaatar

Ruined Tal Zaatar

Palestinians and detachments of Jumblatt are taking revenge. 17 August they begin rocket and artillery shelling of Beirut. More 600 volleys turn the capital of Lebanon into hell. However, in August and September, Syrian troops continued to crowd the Palestinians, already in the north of Lebanon. Now the PLO is in a hopeless situation. As a result, by October 1976, the Syrian troops brutally suppressed all Palestinian groups and established control over the entire territory of Lebanon. This forced Arab countries to intervene in the course of the civil war, which were extremely dissatisfied with the actions of Damascus. It is worth noting that, as in the present, Arab unity was only an appearance. Several countries claimed regional leadership (in particular, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia). Therefore, the strengthening of the position of Damascus in Lebanon irritated the rest of the Arab countries.

In early October, meetings of almost all parties to the Lebanese conflict were held in France and Saudi Arabia. Lebanese President Elias Sarkis, Egyptian President Anwar Saddat, Syrian President Hafez Asad, Emir of Kuwait, King of Saudi Arabia, Gemayel, Kamal Jumblat, and PLO leader Yasser Arafat met at the negotiating table. The parties agreed on a truce, the withdrawal of Syrian troops, the entry of Arab peacekeeping forces, the establishment of permanent Arab forces to maintain stability in Lebanon. During the year, the clauses of the agreement were mainly implemented. The “green helmets” of the Arab peacekeeping forces occupied all the territories, except for the southern regions of Lebanon controlled by Saad Hadad’s army. At the same time, the Arab peacekeeping forces mainly consisted of Syrians (85% of troops). That is, the Syrians have maintained their position in Lebanon.

Thus, the first stage of the war in Lebanon ended. During the two years of the war only 60 thousand people were counted dead. The infrastructure of the country was destroyed. Prosperous "Middle Eastern Switzerland" is a thing of the past. The Lebanese capital Beirut was in ruins, two thirds of its pre-war population of one and a half million left it. The Palestinian forces and the NPS unit were defeated. Despite the fact that in some places clashes continued, by the beginning of the new year most of the Palestinian and Lebanese groups laid down heavy weapons. Beirut was divided into the western part (Palestinians and Muslims) and the Eastern part (Christians). The Union of Christian Parties “Lebanese Front” significantly strengthens its position, and its united army “Lebanese Forces” under the command of the young leader Bashir Gemayel gradually becomes a powerful force.

December 4 1976 tried to kill the leader of the Lebanese Druze and one of the main leaders of the left movement of Lebanon, Jumblatt. 4 killed, 20 man injured. Kamal himself was still alive. The leader of the left Muslim forces (NPS) Kamal Jumblat was shot 16 March 1977 in his car between the settlements of Baaklin and Deir-Durrit in the district of Shuf, south-east of Beirut. In response, the Druze massacred Christians in areas adjacent to the site of the murder, destroying civilians according to various sources from 117 to 250. The village of Deir Durrit was razed to the ground. In Christian areas, the news of Jumblat's death was greeted with glee. This is not surprising. Jumblata in Lebanon was hated by many. If in Beirut and other parts of Lebanon the Druze formations supported the Palestinians, in the mountainous Lebanon, in the places of the original residence of the Druze, they “cleaned” the territory from everyone they could get. Not only Christians were slaughtered, but Palestinians, Sunnis and Shiites. Ethno-confessional massacre in Lebanon was common then. Jumblatt "got" many already, and he would be happy to be eliminated by representatives of a number of groups.

As a result, the NPS block finally collapses. Syrians were suspected of killing Jumblat. Shortly before his death, Jumblat began recklessly to come out with aggressive attacks on the Alawite leadership of Syria, declaring a Sunni-Alawite conflict and an alliance of Alawites with Lebanese Maronite Christians.


Fighters Christian "Phalanx"

The second stage of the Lebanese war. Israeli intervention

It seemed that the war was over and the world would be long. 1977 year became a time of respite. The country is slowly moving away from the war. Embassies of various countries of the world return to Beirut. So, the US returns its embassy to Beirut. Famous artists Charles Aznavour, Julio Iglesias, Demis Rusos, Joe Dassin and Dalida perform in the destroyed Beirut with concerts. In summer, the first groups of tourists arrive in Lebanon.

However, the Big Game continued in the Middle East. The United States did not want to strengthen the position of Syria (an ally of the USSR) in the region. Israel was dissatisfied with the outcome of the war: Syria gained too much influence in Lebanon. Syria actually occupies the northern part of Lebanon, which it considers its territory. The Israelis did not want to tolerate the location of the Syrian troops in areas from which they could strike at the Jewish state bypassing the fortifications on the Golan Heights. At the same time, the Arab (de facto - Syrian) peacekeepers performed the functions of maintaining peace in the south of Lebanon formally - the attacks of the Palestinians against the Jewish settlements in the north of Israel did not stop. After the conclusion of a peace treaty with Egypt at 1976 in Camp David, the Israelis were counting on signing the same agreement with Lebanon. The problem was: with whom to sign it? Lebanese President Frangieu held the pro-Syrian position. The only suitable candidate for the role of Israel-friendly leader was Bashir Gemayel. Therefore, the Israeli government maintained contacts with Bashir Zhmeyel and strengthened his strength.

At the same time, Syria’s relations with the Christian parties, which demand the immediate withdrawal of the Syrian peacekeeping contingent, which has become essentially occupational, are deteriorating. Christians fear that the Syrians will remain in Lebanon for a long time and seize a part of the country. Lebanese Christian leaders begin covert collaboration with Israel, which supplies Christian troops weapons and technology, provides financial support. Militants of the Christian militia were trained in Israel. The United States is also arming the Christian militia by transferring weapons and equipment across the sea. In turn, Damascus is changing its tactics in Lebanon. Syrians are beginning to attract former opponents from the ranks of the collapsed NPS. Syrian troops are beginning to re-equipment of the Palestinian and Lebanese Muslim groups under their control.

7 February 1978, the Syrians from the Arab contingent of peacekeepers arrest the military leader of the Christian "Lebanese forces" Bashir Gemayel at a checkpoint in the Beirut district of Ashrafia. On the same day, the Syrians attack the Lebanese army barracks in Fedaya. The army has shown an unexpected strong resistance, as a result of which the Syrians lose 20 people killed and more 20 prisoners. Up until February 9, the Syrians, with the support of artillery, were attacking Lebanese army barracks. To help the Lebanese army comes the Christian militia "Tigers Ahrar." Dozens of dead on both sides. February 16 parties exchange prisoners. Skirmishes of phalangists with the PLO also began. The leaders of the Christian community announce that henceforth the Syrian army in Lebanon is occupying and demanding its withdrawal. At the same time, the leadership of the Lebanese Front split on the Syrian presence in Lebanon. As a result, Suleiman Frangieu left the pro-Syrian mood.

However, relatively small and scattered Christian units could not resist the Syrian army and Palestinian units. Christians needed direct support from Israel to create a buffer zone in southern Lebanon, where there would be no PLO units and a regular pro-Israel Lebanese army could be created. Ariel Sharon, then Minister of Defense of Israel, still in the middle of 1970, insisted on creating a buffer zone in 15 miles north of the border with Lebanon along the Litani River.

All that was needed was an excuse to invade Lebanon. He soon appeared. On March 11, 1978, Palestinian militants land on the coast near the Israeli city of Haifa, seize a regular bus and move along the highway to Tel Aviv, shooting civilians from the windows of the bus. As a result, 37 Israeli civilians became victims. Then, Israeli troops eliminated the terrorists. In response, Israel begins the military operation "Litania", which lasted three months. March 15, 25 thousand Israeli group supported aviation, artillery and tanks invades southern Lebanon and pushes the Palestinian troops north of the Litani River. The cities of Kuzai, Damur and Tire are bombarded. Lebanese and Palestinians lost between 300 and 1500 killed, while Israel's losses were minimal - 21.

As a result, Israeli troops occupied the southern part of Lebanon and transferred it under the control of the “Southern Lebanon Defense Army” (“Southern Lebanese Army”), led first by Major Saad Haddad and then by General Antoine Lahad. This army was formed with the support of the Israeli army in order to create a “buffer” between the Jewish state and forces hostile to it in the north. The preparation of the army, its equipment and maintenance was carried out directly by Israel. The “Army of Southern Lebanon” on 80% consisted of Christians. The rest were Shiite Muslims, as well as a small number of Druze and Sunni Muslims.

The UN sends UNIFIL blue helmets to Lebanon to control the withdrawal of Israeli troops and to promote the return of Lebanese sovereignty over southern Lebanon. Israel begins the gradual withdrawal of its troops, transferring control over the Christian "Army of Southern Lebanon" seized by Lebanese territory. In addition, Israel is holding the “red line” along the banks of the Litani River. Israel warns Syria that if the Syrian soldiers cross the “red line” the Israeli army will attack the Syrians. At the same time, units of the “Army of Southern Lebanon” attack UN peacekeepers. Later, the "blue helmets" came under attack and Palestinian troops. As a result, the peacekeepers could not restore Lebanese sovereignty in the south of the country.

Under the cover of the Israeli invasion, the Phalang detachments launched a large-scale offensive against their opponents. The war began with a new force. Thus, Syria, solving first of all its own military-strategic tasks, managed to stop the civil war in Lebanon in 1976. The world lasted almost 2 year. However, the actions of Israel and the Christian "Phalanx" led to a new round of conflict, which again escalated into a big war.



To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 5 2017 07: 39
    I remember many names from the 70s. nor what has changed under the moon. The price of water and land in the desert is higher than any cruelty and blood. Now transit has increased. in 20 years they will fight for the stratosphere over this patch of land.
    1. +3
      April 5 2017 12: 37
      These "guardians of the cedars" and we would be in the Siberian taiga. Not that all the cedars are cut by the Chinese. laughing
      1. +1
        April 5 2017 20: 20
        These "guardians of the cedars" and we would be in the Siberian taiga.
        God forbid am These will soon turn Siberia into a desert; they have experience. laughing
  2. +2
    April 5 2017 07: 47
    There was and will not be peace on Lebanese soil .. It hurts many states to put their eyes on this country ..
    1. +2
      April 6 2017 03: 24
      The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and earlier the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has repeatedly stated that there are suspicions that the Lebanese campaign may be considered by the United States only as a prelude to the campaign against Iran.
  3. +5
    April 5 2017 08: 57
    It reminds me of something. Lebanon received the Palestinians, they unleashed a war against Christians. And our leadership strangely took a pro-Palestinian position, although, logically, the Christian population should have stood up. Or is it by principle, the enemy of my enemy is my friend? ... These fanatics will never live with anyone in the world - so many years have passed, but nothing has changed.
    1. 0
      April 5 2017 20: 32
      our leadership strangely took a pro-Palestinian position, although, logically, the Christian population should have stood up
      And what is the logic, the Marxist-Leninist government, suddenly stands up for ideologically alien Christians? This is now our government suddenly remembered with enthusiastic enthusiasm that Russia is a Christian country. And in the seventies, the allies were chosen on the basis of loyalty to Soviet ideology.
  4. +7
    April 5 2017 09: 01
    Israel stood up for Christians.

    Palestinian militants land on the coast of the Israeli city of Haifa, grab a regular bus and drive along the highway to Tel Aviv, shooting civilians from the windows of a bus

    Terrorists always act in the same way, attacking the defenseless. And when they encounter force, they hide behind their children and wives, or in hospitals.
    1. +1
      April 5 2017 15: 12
      We had to try to keep several terrorists alive in order to ask who sent them to Israel. This is very similar to the capture of a radio station in Gleivitz and live canned food.
      1. -1
        April 8 2017 16: 10
        Absolutely, everyone knew the directors, led by gebesnoy protege Arafat. What other clarifications?
    2. 0
      April 5 2017 20: 23
      Yes, and they usually hide out of habit, also for other people's wives and children.
  5. +4
    April 5 2017 09: 05
    Rabinovich, it’s not just because Israel stood up for Christians. He made his own gesheft in this war.
    1. -1
      April 8 2017 16: 14
      You dunce. There is no other explanation for the stupidity that you wrote. The only "gesheft" that Israel has been looking for all these many years is calm and safe borders.
      1. 0
        April 8 2017 16: 28
        Vlad the tops.
        I would tell you, about your essence, as you have been called by the people since the times of the Khazar Khaganate. Yes, alas, three or three warnings, for you ...
        received.
        But gesheft, he's different.
        Well, this is for you to know.
  6. 0
    April 5 2017 09: 05
    Alexander continues to delight.
  7. +2
    April 5 2017 11: 10
    Quote: A resident of the Urals
    It reminds me of something. Lebanon received the Palestinians, they unleashed a war against Christians. And our leadership strangely took a pro-Palestinian position, although, logically, the Christian population should have stood up. Or is it by principle, the enemy of my enemy is my friend? ... These fanatics will never live with anyone in the world - so many years have passed, but nothing has changed.


    The USSR Christian or not was all the same, besides the Christian police were essentially phalangist, i.e. far right. The Union supported its military-political ally
  8. +1
    April 5 2017 11: 26
    during the first stage of the war in Lebanon for two years of the war, only 60 thousand people were counted dead - and Israel was not there then. Arabs - Muslims / Christians / Palestinians carved each other with villages. during the entire participation of Israel in the Lebanese conflict, losses on both sides were many times smaller
    1. +2
      April 5 2017 12: 41
      The civil war in Lebanon (1975-1990) caused serious material damage, radically changed the confessional and political balance in the country. In the fifteen years of the war, nearly 100 thousand people died, 300 thousand were injured, mostly civilians.

      Agriculture and industry suffered the most from the war, and Lebanon's infrastructure was almost destroyed. External debt exceeded $ 2 billion and accounted for a significant portion of GDP.

      Over the years of the crisis, the size of the middle class and the wealthy Lebanese have sharply decreased, most of whose representatives left the country at the beginning of hostilities. More than 600 thousand people, mainly Christians, left Lebanon, which amounted to about 20% of the total population in the pre-war period.
      In general, if someone wants to really understand what the "Middle East question" was called in the USSR, then, of course, you need to turn to serious authors. By the way, one of these is Evgeni Maksimovich Primakov. Primakov is not only a statesman and politician, but also an orientalist - an Arabist.
      Primakov E.M. Anatomy of the Middle East Conflict. - M., 1978.
      Primakov E.M. The story of one conspiracy. - M., 1985
      Primakov E.M. Middle East on stage and backstage. - M., 2006.
      1. 0
        April 8 2017 16: 21
        Do not read Primakov. He occupied an unambiguously one-sided position in events in the BV. He poisoned the USSR into completely unnecessary attempts by the Arabs of the Arabs to destroy Israel and participated in fomenting those wars. The specialist is still ...
        1. a
          0
          16 June 2017 11: 53
          Well, what would be worth reading? Israeli authors? They also one-sidedly consider all the events.
  9. +4
    April 5 2017 14: 30
    If Lebanon really were “Middle Eastern Switzerland,” he would never allow what happened. Switzerland managed to avoid this, despite the fact that they have four languages ​​that have the status of a state. And from a religious point of view, Catholics and Protestants somehow found a way of peaceful coexistence. Switzerland is a monolith, despite the fact that it is considered a confederation, a kind of "alpine hedgehog." They managed to save the united state to this day and not turn it into a "passage yard" to this day.
    1. +1
      April 5 2017 18: 06
      The Swiss perceive themselves as a nation almost from the 14th century, and the Lebanese generally have no idea that they were Lebanese until the mid-twentieth
      1. 0
        April 5 2017 19: 06
        Quote: Cartalon
        The Swiss perceive themselves as a nation almost from the 14th century, and the Lebanese generally have no idea that they were Lebanese until the mid-twentieth

        If you think that in this context the time factor is considered fundamental, you can recall the example of Singapore, how does it differ from Switzerland by and large? This is a country that can be said during the lifetime of one generation has become one of the most developed and prosperous countries in the world, despite the fact that it is not homogeneous both in terms of national composition and in the sense of faiths.
        1. 0
          April 5 2017 20: 41
          You are arguing, but about nothing. The media expression “Switzerland” implies only a high standard of living against the background of neighbors, which Lebanon showed in the context of the Arab countries of the Middle East, as they say has not yet begun. The same thing with Singapore, they just have not yet begun.
          1. 0
            April 5 2017 22: 01
            Yes, I don’t argue with anyone, I’m just stating a fact. Switzerland and Singapore are worthy of imitation in that they did not allow outside forces to intervene, how they build an independent sovereign and prosperous state in the interests of the majority, despite the fact that they are heterogeneous both in ethnic composition and religious, and what will be in the future is not known to mere mortals, and this applies to all, without exception, even those who believe that nothing bad will happen to them. But Lebanon is a pity, indeed once it was the Middle East "Switzerland", before the famous events. A country with a rich history. Maybe someday this country will be able to become prosperous, as in the past best times.
            1. 0
              April 5 2017 23: 18
              although it was not more correct to say, but was considered Middle Eastern Switzerland
  10. +3
    April 5 2017 20: 03
    Christian "Phalanx" are Catholics. The attempt of Catholics supported by Israel to squeeze the Syrians out of Lebanon, where they came at the invitation of the Catholics themselves, led to the extrusion of Catholics from Lebanon.

    The same thing will happen this time - an attempt by the Sunnis supported by Israel to squeeze Shiites out of Syria will lead to the squeezing of Sunnis out of the Levant. And then the Shiite belt from Iran through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon will reach Israel.

    Israel’s "wise" policy in action - such as a reusable rake bully
    1. +2
      April 5 2017 20: 36
      Thanks, I liked it.
      1. 0
        April 6 2017 16: 04
        I learned new things for myself. Thank you, I'm waiting for the continuation of the cycle.
    2. 0
      April 8 2017 16: 28
      Do not repeat the stupidities replicated by well-known "political scientists" about allegedly supporting Israel by any parties in Syria. On one side there are no people who Israel, even theoretically, might want to support. This misinformation is constantly thrown by different parties. First of all - Assad.
  11. +2
    April 7 2017 01: 07
    Good articles about Lebanon, like Samsonov’s everything, but, from my point of view, there is one catch. For some reason, the author does not pay attention to the fact that most often provocations occur at the very moment when someone needs it. For example, Israel has prepared to invade Lebanon, and Palestinians are hijacking a bus on you. Or, the king of Jordan prepared to liquidate the Palestinians' stay in his kingdom, and the Palestinians are hijacking planes before and not later than you. It should be borne in mind that the author himself notes that the same Palestinians and the rest were full of all kinds of detachments subordinate to no one.
    And the Americans ate such a provocation on the dog. They generally believe that such provocations are quite enough, or rather they are mandatory in order to begin the operation prepared for this particular moment. Recall the attack on the market in Bosnia (which the Serbs physically could not get into, but who cared), the find of the killed Albanians in Kosovo (moreover, Finnish experts later proved that they had been hauled in at different times from all over Kosovo, but this did not bother anyone). And in time killed Hungarians in Romania or Lithuanians in Lithuania.
    By the way, and now the same situation, you need a chemical attack, no problem. I do not believe in such coincidences.
  12. a
    0
    16 June 2017 11: 50
    A very interesting article, I never heard or read in such detail about the events of the entry of Syrian troops in Lebanon in 1976, especially about the reasons. In Soviet times, these events were explained quite the opposite. It is also interesting to learn how the Soviet help of the PLO combined with the help of friendly Syria? And this despite the fact that at that moment they were at war with each other ....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"