Iranian ballistic missiles of the Hormuz-2 family: big ambitions and dubious opportunities

25


Many years of military-political pressure on Tehran from Washington, expressed in the regular presence in the Arabian Sea of ​​naval and carrier strike forces of the US Navy, as well as in turning the entire western coast of the Arabian Peninsula into an air / missile anti-missile and at the same time outpost of the US Armed Forces at the maritime border of Iran, forced the military industrial complex of this powerful state to concentrate on large-scale development programs for high-precision strike and defensive weapons. Ambitious projects and contracts for the re-equipment of outdated air defense systems, as well as the upgrade of radio equipment attached to it, were taken as the basis for shaping the country's effective defense capability.



As a result, we were able to observe the birth of the strongest air defense in the region, comparable in capabilities to those of Saudi Arabia and Israel. At the same time, in this direction, Tehran was able to achieve relative self-sufficiency, as indicated by the recent statement by the Minister of Defense of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hussein Dehkan, about the absence of the need to purchase Russian S-400 “Triumph”. Here, the Iranian air defense system is based on the most high-tech “semi-national” project - the Bavar-373 air defense system, which embodies the element base of the Chinese HQ-9 and our C-300PT / PS. Some elements of the latter were at the disposal of the creators of the complex for one and a half to two decades.

Anti-ship capabilities of the Iranian army (against the background of the lack of the required number of carrier rocket-propelled fighter carriers and a "frail" surface component fleet) are supported by a variety of coastal SCRC batteries, which are subordinate to the Guardian Corps of the Islamic Revolution. The most common missile systems are Noor and Qader, with a range of 120 and 250-300 km, respectively. These anti-ship missiles were developed on the basis of the Chinese S-802 and have a similar speed (800 - 900 km / h), a similar flight profile (25 m on the marching section and 4-5 on the final) and an identical radar signature of the order (EPR about 0,15, 2 m1000). Two types of missiles are housed in modular-built launchers placed on the wheeled chassis of trucks like the Mercedes-Benz Axor. On the same trucks, a kung is also located with a point of combat control of the coastal SCRC battery. The IRGC and the Armed Forces of Iran are armed with several hundred similar batteries with 500 or more anti-ship missiles Noor and Qader, ready for immediate use, but their radius of action allows them to fire on enemy surface ships in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. As you know, the tactics of the AUG of the US Navy provide for the strike of the Tomahawk Special Purpose Logistic Force from a distance of 800-XNUMX km, which is carried out in parallel with the anti-radar deck operation aviation.

Since Iran does not yet have a proper airborne component of the fleet and air force, then the 3 low-noise Russian diesel-electric submarines of the 877 EKM will play a huge role here. However, in Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain there are a huge number of strategically important facilities of the US Armed Forces (including the headquarters of the US Navy's 5 operational fleet), to protect which, if necessary, Washington will definitely attract enhanced AUG from 4- 5 EM “Arleigh Burke Burke” and also 2 RKR URO “Ticonderoga” in composition (the States will never send a standard AUG to the shores of the Islamic Republic of Iran). In this situation, and you may need rockets "Noor" and "Qadir". Iranian calculations will be able to run from a few dozen to two hundred ASRs on the American group from the coastal sections of the Harmazgan, Fars and Bushehr provinces, but even this amount is hardly enough to break through the 5 - 7 "Ajis" antimissile shield ship After all, the slow subsonic Iranian RCC will be opposed not by the outdated RIM-67D or RIM-156A SAMs with PARGSN, but by two types of promising anti-missile missiles - light RIM-162 ESSM and long-range RIM-174 ERAM. The latter are equipped with active radar homing and can be guided by target designation of deck aircraft DRLOiU E-2D "Advanced Hawkeye", thanks to this, the Iranian anti-ship missiles will be successfully intercepted at the trans-horizon line from AUG in 50 - 100 km.

The Iranian Armed Forces also have a number of simpler medium-range anti-ship missiles, among which are noted such products as the C-801K subsonic (50 km range, the 7-20 m flight altitude, and the F-4E tactical fighters, Su-24M and etc.), “Raad” (3-hthon RCC with a range of 350 km and speed of 900 km / h, has a large EPR around 0,3-0,5 м2, designed on the basis of the Chinese C-201), the family “Nasr” and “Kowsar "(Range to 35 km and speed ≥1М, mass of warheads 29-130 kg, etc. But operational and tactical missions continue to cause the greatest interest Khalij-e-Fars (Persian Gulf) and Hormuz-2 tivocate ballistic missiles. The Raad missile, for example, can be attributed to the Iranian technological concept of a transition generation, on which Iranian specialists could “stretch their hands” in the development of long-range anti-ship missiles The product is present in the armament of coastal batteries in very small quantities, not widely used due to various tactical and technological deficiencies that are characteristic of anti-ship missiles 60-x. XX century.

The most significant of them are considered subsonic speed and low thrust-to-weight ratio with a large radar signature. Not less unpleasant is the fact that the launch of the 3-htonnoy anti-ship missile "Raad" uses a powerful suspended solid-fuel rocket booster with a thrust from 29 to 33 tons, creating a huge infrared radiation. As a consequence: the launch site of the rocket can easily fix the infrared complexes of high-resolution high-altitude UAVs and tactical aircraft at a distance of 150 and more than a km. For comparison: the thrust of the accelerator PKR "Harpoon" is only 6,6 tons.


The Raad long-range anti-ship missile (not to be confused with the Pakistani strategic Ra'ad missile) is a radically modernized version of the Chinese HY-2 anti-ship missile and our P-15M Termit. Instead of a liquid propellant rocket engine, an economical turbojet is installed. According to the Iranian Defense Ministry, the missile range has been increased from 100 to 300-350 km


As it became known on March 9, 2017 from the informationnews platform rbase.new-factoria.ru with reference to the Iranian news agency Tasnim, the commander of the Air Force and the Military Space Forces of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps, Brigadier General Amir-Ali Hajizadeh made a successful training launch of the ballistic anti-ship missile system “Hormuz-2” in early March. The missile was able to hit the training target at a distance of 250 km, which is already a very good result for the IRI, because achieving the minimum indicator of circular probable deviation (CVO) for a high-speed ballistic missile is a very delicate matter, providing for high performance of its on-board computing facilities, as well as speed data transmission from the homing head to the aerodynamic control module. With a high degree of probability it can be assumed that the element base of this missile, like most types of Iranian precision weapons, is of Chinese origin. For obvious reasons, the statement of the IRGC command makes one feel real pride in the Iranian military-industrial complex, but how effective is the new concept of high-precision weapons against the above described AUG of the United States Navy or the air defense system of missile defense, created by the American army in the countries of the "Arabian coalition"?

To answer this question, you need to familiarize yourself with the tactical and technical characteristics of this rocket, as well as the principle of its use, which is radically different from other (low-altitude and subsonic) anti-ship missiles of the Iranian Armed Forces. No matter how much the Iranian media claims about the uniqueness of the new missile, it is a “thoroughbred” conceptual counterpart of the earlier Khalij-e-Fars ballistic anti-ship missile. Both rockets have a range of 300 km and a speed of about 3200 km / h. Considering the circular probable deviation of the first Khalij-e-Fars modification, they were able to reduce from 30 to 8,5 m, the Hormuz-2 indicator can reach 5 m. This opportunity appeared due to the equipment of the rocket with modern high-resolution television or infrared. Due to the modular type of the targeting compartment, centimeter / millimeter active radar homing can also be installed. With a weight of 650 kg warhead, the error (QUO) in 5-7 m is not a significant drawback, and the enemy’s surface watercraft suffers serious damage.

Moreover, the Hormuz-2 has the ability to destroy mobile / stationary ground targets, and therefore can be used not only to destroy US Navy warships and the Arabian Coalition fleets, but also to attack the most powerful and most dangerous bridgeheads of the US Air Force near the western coast of the Persian Gulf, which include the air base: Al-Dafra (UAE), Al-Udeid (Qatar) and Al Salem (Kuwait). At the same time, Avb El-Udeid will very soon become the front line of the regional aerospace defense system of the United States in the Persian region (here the decimeter radar station ANR / XPS 132 Block-5 with 5500 km will be deployed, and it will cover its powerful air fleet of Qatar Air Force, presented by 72 tactical fighter F-15QA). It was vital for the Iranian armed forces to design a multi-purpose operational-tactical missile system capable of striking in a matter of minutes both the AUG ships of the American fleet and the above-mentioned ground targets. Ormuz-2 has such capabilities. True, for this there are serious technical obstacles.

In particular, the upper parts of the ballistic flight trajectory of the Ormuz-2 rocket, exactly like Khalij-e-Fars, pass at altitudes 40-70 km in the speed range 3 - 3,2М, which turns it into the simplest target for combat information -control systems "Aegis", as well as attached to them ship-based air defense systems SM-3 and SM-6, located on American destroyers and cruisers. Considering the US E-3C / D aircraft that are in service with the US Navy deck aircraft wings, which allow the Iranian Ormuz-2 to be detected even on the overclocking trajectory, they can be intercepted over the western Persian Gulf anti-missile system as RIM-161B and RIM-174-10 as well as guided missiles of the AIM-120D long-range air combat, with which the F / A-18E / F "Super Hornet" carrier-based fighters are armed.

Moreover, due to the low speed of flying in 2300 - 2800 km / h, "Ormuzas" can be quickly detected by the airborne radar of the Emirates and Qatari "Mirage-2000-9" and "Rafale", and then easily destroyed by air-to-air missiles MICA-EM. Let's not forget about the battery of the Patriot PAC-2 / 3 air defense system on the Arabian Peninsula covering the American air bases: for them, the Ormuz-2 missiles in general pose virtually no threat. The new MIM-104C and ERINT anti-missiles have advanced semi-active and active radar homing systems with work software for ballistic objects. These interceptor missiles shoot down dozens of "Hormuz-2" with a probability of 0,8 - 0,95.

Unfortunately, even in the appearance of the Hormuz-2 missiles, the simple design of the aerodynamic controls and the absence of a block of gas-dynamic control engines are well traced. All this indicates a low maneuverability capabilities of the BR, which will not allow “to leave” even from such a rocket as the “Super-530D” or the AIM-7M “Sparrow. The Hormuz-2 is a large missile with an EPR near 0,5 - 0,7 m2, which is why not only the Arabian-NNXX Mirage-2-2000NNXXR-NNXX MiG-9 fighter radar with MiG-XNUMX fighter radar can be detected by Emirates MiG-XNUMX-XNUMX fighter jets. ".

The lack of high maneuverability qualities of the Hormuz-2 rocket, together with the use of an active radar homing head, creates another unpleasant surprise for the command of the IRGC. Its essence lies in the simplicity of intercepting the Ormuz-2 ballistic anti-ship missile with the aid of the RIM-116 Block-2 self-defense missiles used in the ASMD ("SeaRAM") anti-aircraft missile system. Even if the Hormuz-2 homing head doesn’t have the necessary temperature to capture the RIM-116 Block-2 RAM infrared-ultraviolet seeker, the RIM-116 second passive radar channel, presented by two miniature radio interferometers, placed in front of the radome of the thermal seeker on the special “antennal” rods. Interferometers provide guidance for the electromagnetic radiation of an active radar homing head of an enemy missile. Consequently, due to the impossibility of intensive anti-aircraft maneuvering of Ormuz-2 missiles, the use of active radar guidance makes them even more vulnerable to the near defensive line of American destroyers, cruisers, littoral warships of the coastal zone and aircraft carriers (all of them are equipped with ASMD).


Run the rim-xnumx block-xnumx


Based on the above parameters of the new Iranian multi-purpose OTBR, as well as the technological features of the air defense systems of the US fleet and the missile defense of strategic air bases on the western shores of the bay, it can be emphasized that even the massive use of multi-purpose Khalij-e-Fars / “ Hormuz-2 "will not allow the Iranian armed forces to cause significant damage to Washington’s advanced strike and defensive bridgehead on the Arabian Peninsula, including its supporting groups Key US Navy. For a noticeable change in the alignment of forces in Front Asia, Tehran needs to develop and mass-produce promising supersonic types of high-precision weapons with a low-altitude flight profile, as well as low radar and infrared visibility.

Information sources:
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/news/v-irane-vypolneny-uspeshnye-ispytaniya-pkr-hormuz-2
http://imp-navigator.livejournal.com/154722.html
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/ram_rim116/ram_rim116.shtml
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 6 2017 07: 10
    This is a threat to Israel.
    1. +5
      April 6 2017 08: 15
      Rabinowicz
      This is a threat to Israel.
      Who?! More precisely than ?! Iranximi RCC? Yes, they fly with difficulty. Even the range of the entire Persian Gulf is at least enough to "shoot"?
      1. +3
        April 6 2017 11: 12
        Quote: Observer2014
        Who?! More precisely than ?! Iranximi RCC? Yes they fly with difficulty

        Here, as it were, such a thing:
        1.Hormuz series missiles (Hormuz-1 and Hormuz-2) are similar in purpose and characteristics to anti-ship missiles of the Khalige Farce coastal base and created on the basis of an operational-tactical missile "Fateh-110".
        2.Fateh-110 with TTRD
        Fateh-110 first generation 200 km 650 kg Max 3.5
        Second generation Fateh-110 250 km 450 kg Mach 3,7
        Fateh-110 third generation 300 km 650 kg Mach 3
        Fateh-110-D1 (fourth generation) 300 km 650 kg Mach 3
        3. Fateh-313, an Iranian solid-fuel short-range ballistic missile, was unveiled on 21 on August 2015 of the year. Rocket - a new generation of rocket families Fateh-110. The missile is almost identical to the previous generation of the Fateh-110 missile. The rocket uses a new composite fuel and body, which increased the range to 500 km.
        4.Zolfaghar with multiple separation warheads (MRV)
        This is a new and improved version of the family of solid-fuel tactical ballistic missiles Fateh-110, declared range confirmed by launches 700-750km (in my opinion in 2015 or in 2016)



        Like yes:

        However, if you dream up with a launch point (given that they can be based on the SPU and on the ships of the Iranian Navy), as well as progress in range: 200,250,300,500,750,?, ?? Km
        It is annoying.

        So, Comrade Rabinovich from Israel is not in vain worried

        n.1. it is only for MTCR, shopping mall “Fateh-110” based on Zelzal-2, and it is based on the Soviet FROG-7 (9K52 Luna-M)

        Quote: matak4b
        Iran's only (and huge) threat to Israel is nuclear weapons

        and delivery system of course. And with them they have obvious progress.
        The belt of a shahid with YaBch has not yet been invented, thank God, and the CNBZ of a knapsack type will not be available to Iran for another 30-50 for years if nothing changes dramatically
        1. 0
          April 6 2017 17: 06
          in fact, everything is simple

          Iran scares US to deter attack

          In the event of a real threat of aggression from the United States and Israel - Iran will immediately receive much better Balls and Onyxes and additional air defense and even cheaper from China, but in large quantities there are a lot of things - the benefit of the railway was built recently and everything can be put

          If Syria is not surrendered, then Iran will definitely not surrender
          1. +1
            April 6 2017 18: 47
            Quote: Talgat
            If Syria is not surrendered, then Iran will definitely not surrender

            Oh, and who didn’t surrender to Syria? And to whom?
            Quote: Talgat
            Iran will receive immediately

            In such a situation, the score will go for minutes.
    2. +2
      April 6 2017 08: 29
      The only (and huge) threat to Israel from Iran is nuclear weapons. Iran’s conventional army is very weak
      1. +2
        April 6 2017 11: 20
        The launch of two medium-range Iranian ballistic missiles (one with an EMP explosive magnetic generator, the other with a penetrating concrete warhead) through a nuclear reactor in Dimon - and Khan Israel.
      2. +2
        April 6 2017 11: 49
        Quote: matak4b
        The only (and huge) threat to Israel from Iran is nuclear weapons.

        That is why Iran needs to create nuclear weapons for self-defense or that it is much better to disarm the aggressive Israeli regime.
        1. +2
          April 6 2017 14: 38
          Quote: quilted jacket
          Nuclear weapons for self-defense

          You see, if the G-d ordered the Americans to bring democracy, homosexuality and Coca-Cola to the whole world, then he just gave the promised (promised) land to the Jews - a clearly limited piece (Sinai-Jordan-Gollan-Middle-earth). So there is no "self-defense" from Israel and never has been. The western border of Jordan is not guarded.
          But the regimes, declaring that Israel has no place on earth, like today's Iran - yes, indeed they can run into. And here Israel can be understood and forgiven.
          1. +3
            April 6 2017 16: 00
            Quote: Octopus
            then he just gave the Jews the promised (promised) land - a clearly limited piece

            A piece of land under the state of Israel was given by countries that won the Second World War out of pity for the Jews and no one else.
            Quote: Octopus
            But the regimes, declaring that Israel has no place on earth, like today's Iran - yes, indeed they can run into. And here Israel can be understood and forgiven.

            C'mon, the Israeli regime is an extremely aggressive entity that threatens all the countries in the region and then captured and then annexed Arab Palestine.
            1. +2
              April 6 2017 17: 09
              Quote: quilted jacket
              countries that won the Second World War out of pity for the Jews and no one else.

              1. Out of a desire once again to give a shit to the British and to squeeze them from BV.
              2. The opinion of the victorious countries changes at that time (including on the question of who is the victorious country). Opinion B! Ha invariably more than 2 thousand years. At least this is the platform of Zionism, a few I know.
              Quote: quilted jacket
              extremely aggressive formation

              Refresh in memory of who declared war to someone there and in what sequence.
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Arab Palestine.

              West Jordan, you wanted to say? Take an interest in the status of these territories at the time of their "occupation". Separately, I note that old Hussein (Hashimit) in those days imposed such a constitutional order among the Palestinians that it was nice and expensive.
              I’ll also note that if I had the same rogues from Katyusha-rockets in my wartime, I would also advocate genocide, and I don’t care that they are local, and I’m a newcomer.
              1. +1
                April 6 2017 17: 19
                Quote: Octopus
                Out of a desire once more to shit the British and squeeze them from the BV.

                Read the story once again England was just one of the victorious countries in the Second World War and it was she who, with the help of the USSR and the USA, divided her protectorate into BV.
                .
                Quote: Octopus
                Refresh in memory of who declared war to someone there and in what sequence.

                Even for its short existence on the planet earth, the Israeli regime attacked Egypt in 1956 on neighboring Arab countries in 1967 on Lebanon in 1982 and in 2006.
                Quote: Octopus
                West Jordan, you wanted to say?

                There is no Arab Palestine country formed by decision of the UN together with Jewish Israel.
                Quote: Octopus
                I’ll also note that if I had the same rogues from Katyusha-rockets in my wartime, I would also advocate genocide, and I don’t care that they are local, and I'm a newcomer.

                You can immediately see a real Jew imagining himself a God-chosen Aryan lol
                1. +1
                  April 6 2017 18: 32
                  Quote: quilted jacket
                  with the help of the USSR and the USA shared

                  Yeah. This is precisely the help of the USA and the USSR was necessary in the division of their own colonies. It was impossible to divide without their participation.
                  Quote: quilted jacket
                  attacked Egypt in 1956 on neighboring Arab countries in 1967 on Lebanon in 1982 and in 2006.

                  Dashing ripples, these Jews. Could you tell in more detail what they found there, that they attacked all the "neighboring Arab countries" at once?
                  Quote: quilted jacket
                  Arab Palestine, a country formed by decision of the UN together with Jewish Israel.

                  You see, the theme of Arab Palestine exists exactly from the moment it is "annexed" by Israel. While she was part of Jordan, everyone who wanted to talk about this topic was promptly put up against the wall. And with tremendous bust, I want to note.
                  Quote: quilted jacket
                  you are a real jew

                  Well no. Just while the NURSs are shooting, there’s nothing to talk to and about.
  2. +4
    April 6 2017 08: 27
    It seems that everything is correctly written, all TTx are consistent, but the author shies in his articles from side to side (regardless of what he writes). So it is here. Speaking of the minus of the Iranian anti-ship missiles, he was right there, he stroked the pluses with a smear. And this is the case when the quantity goes into quality. Even if a missile defense (missile defense) has a probability of defeat of 0,85-0,9, this means only one thing. For 100% defeat, it will be necessary to use several missiles to defeat such a target. Depending on the number of launchers, you can simply oversaturate the missile defense system of the ships and this is enough for 2-4 missiles to break through to cause significant damage.
    Of course, the use of the BKRR as ground-to-ground missiles is stupid enough. Nevertheless, it is not worth talking about hat-throwing either.
    1. +1
      April 6 2017 10: 20
      Quote: Old26
      when quantity goes into quality

      Americans will not put 3 of their missiles on one Iranian? Seriously?
      Quote: Rabinovich
      This is a threat to Israel.

      Is Israel planning to expand to the Persian Gulf? To Persians 250 km was enough?
      1. 0
        April 6 2017 11: 16
        Quote: article
        But the most interesting is the operational-tactical anti-ship ballistic missiles of the Khalij-e-Fars (Persian Gulf) and Hormuz-2 families ........ No matter how much the Iranian media declares the uniqueness of the new missile, it is a “thoroughbred” conceptual analogue of the earlier Khalij-e-Fars ballistic anti-ship missile system. Both missiles have a range of 300 km and a speed of about 3200 km / h. Given the circular probable deviation of the first Khalij-e-Fars modification, they were able to reduce it from 30 to 8,5 m, the Ormuz-2 indicator can reach 5 m

        Here, the author is most likely right and the Hormuz-2 anti-ship missile system is a development of the Khalij-e-Fars anti-ship missile launcher which was designed for one missile, but now Iran can launch an anti-ship missile launcher with a new launcher, and if for high-tech US ships even a volley missile is not particularly scary, then for the ships of the Persian Gulf countries which will be the most likely opponents of Iran to shoot down these missiles will be quite problematic.
        By the way, let’s not forget that only China and Iran now have ballistic RCC.
        The predecessor of the RCC Hormuz-2, manufactured in Iran, the RCC Khalij-e-Fars, had good accuracy in any case during the exercises.

        Quote: article
        The Iranian Armed Forces also have a number of simpler medium-range anti-ship missiles, among which there are such products as: subsonic S-801K (range 50 km, flight height 7-20 m, carriers - tactical fighters F-4E, Su-24M and etc.), "Raad" (3-ton RCC with a range of 350 km and a speed of 900 km / h, has a large EPR of about 0,3-0,5 m2, designed on the basis of the Chinese S-201), the Nasr family "And" Kowsar "(range up to 35 km and speed ≥1M, warhead weight 29-130 kg, etc.

        Here are some types of anti-ship missiles currently in service with Iran.

        Quote: article
        The Raad missile, for example, can be attributed to the Iranian technological concept of the transitional generation, on which Iran’s specialists were able to “get their hands on” in the development of long-range RCC. The product is present in the arsenal of coastal batteries in very small quantities; it is not widely used due to various tactical and technological shortcomings that are characteristic of anti-ship missiles of the 60s. XX century.

        Most likely, it was generally written off as it was invisible for a long time in the exercises.
        Quote: article
        carriers - tactical fighters F-4E, Su-24M, etc.

        Now Iran is trying to adapt all types of its anti-ship missiles to the various aircraft it has in service, but again, it will most likely be effective against the Gulf countries.
        F-4 Phantom with RCC
      2. 0
        April 6 2017 12: 40
        Americans will not put 3 of their missiles on one Iranian? Seriously?

        Probably not. Just because it is very expensive. A dozen erupted missiles from hundreds launched, even with a conventional warhead, are more than serious.
        1. +1
          April 6 2017 13: 39
          1. So they are not breaking into New York, but to a military base. Nothing good follows such a breakthrough for Iran.
          2. Well, there were a dozen missiles breaking through to Tel Aviv. So what?
      3. +3
        April 6 2017 16: 10
        0
        Octopus Today, 10:20 ↑
        Quote: Old26
        when quantity goes into quality

        Americans will not put 3 of their missiles on one Iranian? Seriously?

        If Iran, in a sufficiently short period of time (20-30 minutes), fires at American AUG 200-250 anti-ship missiles of various types, will the Americans be able to fire 600-750 anti-aircraft missiles? Seriously?
        1. +1
          April 6 2017 17: 14
          Quote: Captain Pushkin
          Americans will be able to shoot 600-750 anti-aircraft missiles?

          1. And how much is it, if you count in Berks?
          2. Why would the Yankees send AUG to a potentially dangerous area without the Tomahawks rush? With ground bases it’s more difficult, but there it’s quite possible to hit 1000 missiles there, the question of price.
        2. +2
          April 6 2017 17: 24
          Quote: Captain Pushkin
          If Iran for a sufficiently short period of time (20-30 minutes) shells American AUG 200-250 anti-ship missiles of various types

          It is unlikely that so many anti-ship missiles Iran will shoot one AUG out, Israeli Jews in 2006 were unable to repel even one Hezbollah anti-ship missiles (delivered by Iran) despite the presence of the Barak air defense system and the ZALK Falanks and the world's best electronic warfare systems (as the Israelis repeatedly boasted)
  3. +1
    April 6 2017 17: 26
    Arab weapons kill only Arabs, mostly their co-religionists.
  4. 0
    April 6 2017 20: 06
    Quote: Octopus
    Americans will not put 3 of their missiles on one Iranian? Seriously?

    I do not say that they will not expose. I say that missile defense system can be saturated? How will the missile defense system work if, for example, 20 missiles are launched at the same time? And if it’s 40 or 50. We must also take into account the channel. You can set the number. That's just maybe the number of Iranian missiles will be quite large. Theoretically of course
    1. +1
      April 6 2017 20: 32
      Quote: Old26
      That's just maybe the number of Iranian missiles will be quite large

      Some strange ideas you have. That Iran, with GDP at par less than the US military budget, can ask for mattresses, albeit on a local theater.
      It seems to me fairly obvious that if Iran suddenly appears sufficiently effective anti-ship missiles, then what happen there will simply not be any AUGs on the first day. MassKR with Ohio and strategists. Let me remind you that Tomahawks only in Ohio 616 pcs. But on the second day already AUG.
    2. 0
      April 8 2017 21: 55
      Quote: Old26
      How will the missile defense system work if, for example, 20 missiles are launched at the same time? And if it’s 40 or 50. We must also take into account the channel.

      The numbers are mesmerizing, all these percentages, probabilities. In fact, there is no guarantee that even one missile will be fought off. Only higher chances, but not one hundred percent.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"