LAS proposal to bring peacekeepers to Syria rejected

11
Official Damascus rejected the initiative of the Arab League (League of Arab States), aimed at ending the confrontation in Syria, which continues for 11 months, reports Interfax. The resolution, which was adopted following the meeting of foreign ministers of the League in Cairo, calls for the introduction of a joint peacekeeping contingent of Arab countries and the UN in Syria.

The League also announced the development of ties with the rebels and the termination of all diplomatic contacts with the Syrian authorities.

In response, Yusef Ahmad, the Permanent Representative of Syria to the League, said that the Arab countries, after failing to adopt a UN Security Council resolution on Syria, "are in a state of hysteria."

On the eve of the Arab League held an emergency meeting at the level of foreign ministers in Cairo in private. The agenda was only one issue - the situation in Syria, where armed clashes between opposition forces and the Assad regime occur more than ten months.

26 December 2011. The League of the Syria sent observers after the Syrian-Arab Protocol on the admission of observers to the country was signed. 23 January at a meeting in the Egyptian capital, the League extended for a month the mandate of the observer mission and promised to expand its capabilities. The Syrian government agreed with this decision. Later, the Arab League suspended the mission, as the level of violence in the country increased. According to the UN, the death toll during the clashes exceeded 5 thousand people.

Russia and China 4 February at a meeting of the UN Security Council used their veto power in voting on the draft resolution on Syria, introduced by the delegation of Morocco. This document provided for the application of sanctions against the regime of Assad.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    11 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. serg792002
      +1
      13 February 2012 10: 29
      Nothing to do, let them sit at home. Conductors of Western interests.
    2. +3
      13 February 2012 10: 32
      Who else would have agreed that later, under the guise of covering the peacekeeping forces, would NATO be entered without a passage zone ?!
      1. +2
        13 February 2012 10: 54
        Quote: urzul
        Who else would have agreed that later, under the guise of covering the peacekeeping forces, would NATO be entered without a passage zone ?!








        Greetings and support! They (the "civilized") have this favorite game - to start with the introduction of peacekeepers and then bring down bombs on people's heads! In 080808, the same fucking peacekeepers, having provided cover for the concentration of rodent troops, a few hours before X, fled, putting our guys and residents of Tskhinvali under fire! Send such peacekeepers many times!
    3. PISTOL
      +1
      13 February 2012 10: 32
      If the peacekeepers will be from those countries that are for Syria and for Assad to remain, then I think we need to introduce peacekeepers there to help Assad shoot back from the militants from the West.
    4. alatau_09
      +1
      13 February 2012 10: 38
      I didn’t get a trojan from propindosnos ... now they tear my hair from everywhere where my hand reaches ... and at that time, a country possessing nuclear weapons supported Iran against Israel and Amers ... in turn, Iran insures Syria with weapons and guards ...

      http://warfiles.ru/show-2768-pakistan-ugrozhaet-podderzhat-iran-v-sluchae-napade


      niya-izrailya.html
    5. svvaulsh
      +2
      13 February 2012 10: 44
      There are many interests in Syria. The stability of the country does not need the West, because Syria is an ally of Iran, the Saudis - in terms of building a great caliphate, the Ottomans - in terms of rebuilding the empire. I think in the very near future this pack will tear apart an independent state, creating a new hotbed of instability in the region.
    6. in4ser
      0
      13 February 2012 10: 58
      svvaulsh,
      I do not think the Syrians and Iranians will defeat this whole fuss, with difficulty with sweat on their faces, but they will win !!! many countries have rallied against this war.
      1. svvaulsh
        +2
        13 February 2012 14: 13
        I want to believe, but here I am a pessimist. Russia will not get involved in a mess, and the Syrians will not stand up against Amers, and even with such a fifth column in the country.
    7. Bob
      0
      13 February 2012 11: 28
      The capture and destruction of states is the face of new fascism. And this evil seems to come from Qatar, Saudi Arabia - the richest countries in the world based on per capita income. Pindos actively help this evil - because it is the main market for arms. Everything is seized, and the war is not just for democracy in the states, but in the oil states, so that the Saudis then, together with the Pindos, gain control of the richest and most demanded world oil market.
      Well, they do not fight in Samali, in Niger or elsewhere - NOT FAVORABLE.
      If you analyze the situation and predict the future, then the Caspian Sea with its hydrocarbons and Russia with its reserves will also be an attractive object for democratization, and preparations for this have been going on for several decades, a whole generation of cowards, renegades and traitors who see no value in their homeland has been born and this is a problem. Enemies are internal and external, and they will have to fight with both in order to remain a state.
      And Syria is our leading front for today, tomorrow there will be Iran, and this is the Caspian, Caucasus, Central Asia - a direct threat to Russia. Depending on how the problem with Syria is resolved, our future also depends.
    8. Owl
      0
      13 February 2012 13: 47
      The Syrians do not want occupation. If Russia and Iran succeed in defending Syria, aggression is pushed away from its borders.
    9. gent
      0
      13 February 2012 14: 11
      at the moment they will not climb into Syria and Iran. . much can get ... the presence on the territory of Russian weapons and the help of China and Russia made the Americans think ... well, if you have no mind, then come to hell. then nothing will stop

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"