Not long wedding danced
And how beautiful, how romantic this story! "The first interfactional wedding!" - broadcast from all television screens. And indeed, it was difficult not to be touched, seeing the strict bride and groom in a white dress. Yes, and even knowing that the groom represents the Communist Party faction, and the bride - the faction of "United Russia". Even a chastushka went to the people with these words: “Apricot lips, and I sing cleanly. Happy United Russia, at night - a communist". And when the newlyweds had a child, in the State Duma’s buffet, in joy, they treated all visitors for free.
So the story could start about some positive hero, but - alas ... Our "hero" was not a hero at all.and it ended in treason. But not the same as in the novels about the wedding and veil. And - the most natural betrayal of the Motherland (not to mention the betrayal of the party, thanks to which he came to the State Duma of the Russian Federation). And they wrote Negeroy into scrap, as used material.
So, the wedding of Denis Voronenkov and Maria Maksakova took place in March 2015. As it turned out, the bride is something with a very, very dubious past. And the party, and his wife, he used for the sole purpose - to cover himself.
I do not want to call Voronenkov a communist - it would mean to defile the high idea with which millions of people went to die for their homeland. Moreover, he himself easily repudiated the Communist Party, lied to the public, as if he was not a member of it — he simply ran for parliament. The leadership of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation refuted Voronenkov's words - it turns out he was, and not even an ordinary one, but a member of the Central Committee.
If you dig deeper, this wedding is not so interparty, because in due time - namely, in 2000, Voronenkov was the senior referent of the “Unity” faction apparatus (this fraction is the predecessor of the current United Russia). Even then, he got into an unpleasant story: it turned out that he was extorting money (supposedly for the party) from one of the businessmen, promising him to loot the interests of his business. But the businessman (his last name was Trostentsov) did not wait for the fulfillment of the promises and turned to the law enforcement agencies. Then, the cunning Voronenkov managed not only to "otmazatsya", but also to put himself in the role of a fighter against corruption.
In this capacity - an uncompromising fighter against corruption - Denis Voronenkov and ran for the Communist Party. He made a party career quickly - the faction even tried to nominate him for membership in the Accounts Chamber.
But law enforcement had many questions to him. He was implicated not only in extortion of bribes, but also in raider seizures, smuggling and other crimes. From the "inconvenient" questions Voronenkov saved parliamentary immunity.
And the story of a beautiful wedding helped him avoid depriving him of that same immunity. When the Investigation Committee tried to raise this question, it was found for Voronenkov who would intervene. Thanks to his wife's connections. For him, in particular, stood up by the then State Duma Chairman Sergei Naryshkin, with whom Voronenkov became friends at the time of his marriage. And how was it possible to offend the hero of such a romantic story, which was told to the whole country?
In the elections to the State Duma in September 2016, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation no longer included him in the federal list. He had a chance to go through a single-member district - from Nizhny Novgorod. But the local communists came out sharply against him. Anyway, the ex-deputy campaign failed. This meant that with the termination of the powers of the Duma there would no longer be a saving mandate. It was necessary to look for a new way to escape from the omnipresent law enforcement officers.
And this method was found. True, for this it was necessary to renounce not only their convictions (which, apparently, Voronenkov never had), not only the Communist Party faction, but also all other deputies and, ultimately, Russia.
Our antihero leaves for the capital "Square". To earn asylum, he seeks to be a useful junta. And what to take with him, besides testimony? It was he who gave the testimony - against the legitimate president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovich. Allegedly, Yanukovych’s letter influenced the decision of the State Duma deputies to allow V. Putin to send troops into Ukrainian territory.
All this very much fits into the propaganda of the current Kiev junta: Yanukovych "called on foreign troops for help" and, therefore, committed "treason". About cookies foreigners Victoria Nuland junta prefers not to remember (although, of course, cookies are only the outside, a vivid symbol of the colossal support that external forces provided to Euromaidan).
Voronenkov also spoke against the annexation of the Crimea to Russia, showing disrespect for the will of the inhabitants of the peninsula. Once in Kiev, he suddenly "remembered" that he did not vote. According to him, when the Communist Party faction decided to support the annexation of the Crimea, they voted for him with a card. To believe him or not to believe? Rather, he lied, as well as his membership in the Communist Party. At least, when he was profitable, he did not object to the decision of the faction, did not come out of it, did not slam the door, as his colleague Ilya Ponomarev (to the meeting with which he was going on the day of his death). But how could Voronenkov receive Ukrainian citizenship if he had not renounced the Crimea? It became profitable - renounced.
In exchange for all these testimonies and the renunciations, the junta gave him protection - as a witness, whose life is at risk. Not saved ... Or did not want to save?
The first reaction to the news of the exchange of fire at the Premier Palace Hotel in Kiev, during which Voronenkov was killed: well, now they will dump him again on Russia. And for sure - Mr. Poroshenko was completely predictable. His press secretary, on behalf of the chief, stated: “The insidious murder in the center of Kiev Denis Voronenkov is an act of state terrorism on the part of Russia, which he was forced to leave for political reasons. The clear handwriting of the Russian special services ...».
The reaction of Prosecutor General of Ukraine Yury Lutsenko was about the same: “This was a typical witness for the Kremlin.».
Shortly before his death, the ex-deputy gave an interview in which he stated: “In Ukraine, unlike in other post-Soviet countries, democratic laws work". Nothing to say - for which he fought.
But this was not the only revelation of Voronenkov. He also complained: "On the Russian central television channels, they are already screaming with might and main: they say that Voronenkov must be exchanged for Sushchenko, and if it does not work out - kill him, like Bandera. People in Russia are crazy, they are not healthy". I remember, there was another traitor - Alexander Litvinenko, from whom liberal propaganda made a “hero”. Before his death, he also spoke about the "insidious" Moscow and that Putin personally wants to kill him.
A very desirable picture emerges for Kiev: the Kremlin killed a valuable witness. Well, how can you not poorat about the “Russian aggressors” again?
However, as it turned out the shooter was a citizen of Ukraine, and yes even a participant in the so-called "ATO" - that is, the wars started by junta against Donbass. In general, dill, or dill ordinary. We will never hear any details from him. In a shootout with a Voronenkov guard, the killer was wounded and soon died in hospital. The ends in the water ...
So, if we discard the fabrications of the authorities, at the moment we can consider three main versions happened
1. The murder of Voronenkov is an intentional anti-Russian provocation by the Kiev authorities.
2. The Ukrainian radicals, despite the “value” of this witness, still could not accept the fact that a citizen of Russia, and even formally a “communist”, was granted asylum and even some privileges. (The previous actions of the radicals, who opposed any person, even his ally, whose thinking is a little different from their ideas, support this version. Although the first version still looks more logical).
3. The murder is generally not connected with politics, but is a consequence of the dark criminal past of Voronenkov.
True, another version appears in the press - as if the ex-husband of Maksakova might have been involved in the murder, but, in my opinion, it should be considered only the last.
I remember a number of high-profile deaths that were used in the world for anti-Russian propaganda and, therefore, to justify all sorts of sanctions against the Russian Federation. And this murder looks like a provocation of the same kind.
Moreover, on the day when Voronenkov was killed, another major incident happened in Ukraine - a strong fire and explosions of ammunition in a warehouse in Balakliya (Kharkiv region). Ukrovlasti presents this incident as "Moscow sabotage." (Of course, one can only be glad that bombs and rockets that could kill people in the Donbass are so ineptly profukan if the incident would not have caused damage to the civilian population).
So almost ideal conditions are created for anti-Russian hysteria - in one day, two high-profile cases at once.
And on the eve of the Ukrainian regime "sat in a puddle" - disgraced the whole world. He demonstrated his animal fear of a girl with disabilities, a Russian singer Yulia Samoilova, who would have to sing at Eurovision. SBU banned her entry. And, although the leadership of Eurovision has swallowed such a blatant desecration of the competition, people in the world are not fools. Ukraine looked very ugly. And here - opportunity to divert attention from the shameful incident and to direct all sympathy to yourself. And Russia should again be set as a “wild country”, killing “valuable witnesses” ...
Returning to our "hero" - he died, as he lived. He lived in treason and died at the hands of those whom he considered his own. In a country where he hoped to find security and for this he betrayed his homeland. He escaped from court, and found lead. Dark biography - murky death.
Perhaps the most accurate words describing this case were spoken by the first deputy chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, a member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Ivan Melnikov: “Now one thing is obvious: how a person built his destiny, how he acted, what principles he was guided by, he ended it. And it was all very muddy. There is such a thing - played. Played and fell into the millstones of some dark game, where he turned out to be a public change coin».
It is a pity that he disgraced the title of communist ...
Information