Candidate Yavlinsky: from “normalizing relations with the West” to “convening a Constituent Assembly”
Exactly one year before the presidential election. The political, and, more precisely, political-tech race has begun. And it began even without a shot of a starting pistol - they rushed. Someone from a low, some from a high start, and some from no time to change the form in which the performance went in previous seasons. One of the starters was a political old-timer - an eternal opposition figure who counts on the leader’s shirt, but instead of a shirt that has received in recent years political-level political initiative approval — Grigory Yavlinsky.
Grigory Alekseevich’s website, which broadcasts in two languages (Russian and English), has become a platform on which the presidential candidate preparing to celebrate his 65 anniversary, has shared his program with the public. This program will be devoted to this material, which opens the cycle with the publication of the programs of all those who are nominated for participation in the upcoming elections (2018) as a candidate.
For reference: Grigory Yavlinsky, according to his personal statistics, will try “presidential” happiness for the third time. Previous results are as follows:
1996 year - Yavlinsky gains 7,34% of votes, taking the total 4 place;
2000 year - with 5,8% of the votes, the leader of the Yabloko party takes the third place after Vladimir Putin and Gennady Zyuganov.
What is going on now?
The new program (aka platform) of Yavlinsky, presented the other day, consists of three main sections, named as follows: “Urgent actions”, “Main goals” and “Priorities”. Already the name alone makes shrug. It is not entirely clear, will the priority tasks be solved before the commission of urgent actions, or both, after the “main goals”? In general, everything important, urgent and top priority is such a platform.
So, if hypothetically admit that Grigory Yavlinsky not only registered as a candidate for the presidency of the Russian Federation, but also won the elections in March 2018, then we should consider what he is preparing for us - ordinary citizens of the country.
As mentioned urgent actions, Grigoriy Alekseevich (hereinafter referred to as “pokitatno”): “will stop the state lie”, “will cancel repressive anti-civil laws”, “will release political prisoners”, “will stop military-political adventures”, “will refuse confrontation with Europe and the world” “Normalizes relations with Ukraine”.
Remarkably, isn't it? That's just the impression that such statements are not meant for Russian citizens, but for external “consumption”. A sort of advertising for those who are willing to invest in the presidential campaign 2018 in Russia with the aim to caress the candidate advantageous for themselves.
The statement itself “to give up confrontation with Europe and the world” looks like a fairy tale about a white bull — against the background that since the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, Europe and some countries of the world have not refused to confront us. If Grigory Alekseevich forgot himself, then he needs to be reminded of the promises made by partners in this form: “You support the unification of Germany, and we will not move NATO’s infrastructure east a single step.” Well, where are those promises?
Who launched the confrontation - Russia or all those who unilaterally withdrew from the fundamental treaties? For example, the treaty on the limitation of missile defense systems, from which the United States came out in 2002 year. Why did they “go in the same person” without accepting Russian attempts to clarify the situation? Oh, yes ... - they came up with a fable about the Iranian threat ... but so far no documents of "nondirectionality" against the Russian Federation have been provided.
It is worth reminding Grigoriy Alekseevich that at that time Russia had rather warm relations with Ukraine, and the partnership with the USA was conducted in virtually all areas (from supporting the operation carried out in Afghanistan by US troops to concluding contracts in the field of energy). So who started the confrontation, and why does Russia need to give it up with regard to the fact that the West is not going to refuse it? .. Russia would have refused the confrontation with pleasure, but the process should be two-sided, as they have already dealt with verbal promises ”and M. Gorbachev's joyful nodding. Yavlinsky has no word about it.
Further - “normalization of relations with Ukraine”. It is also an excellent point of the platform in all respects, especially considering that Ukraine is not capable of normalizing relations within itself today. They can not fulfill their own obligations, they are hammering out of all calibres in the long-suffering Donbas, arranging all kinds of blockades. The Nazis march through the streets and squares with torches in their hands, persecute those who opposed the Maidan, carry out demonstrative reprisals against those who are not yet able to resist them. So who is Grigory Alekseevich going to normalize relations with? With Poroshenko, whose rating fell below 12%, or with Rada, the percentage of approval of the activities of which from the population is completely below the "plinth". With whom?
"Main goals" from Yavlinsky:
And here Mr. Yavlinsky contradicts himself. On the one hand, he is going to unite the people "on the basis of respect for man" and immediately declares the times of the existence of the USSR "lawless rule." And the fact that millions of Russian citizens have a completely different, in contrast to Yavlinsky, view of “Bolshevik rule” doesn’t bother Grigori Alekseevich? And doesn’t he be embarrassed by the fact that it was under the “lawless Bolshevik rule” that he received an education (not at all in the ordinary higher educational institution of the country — the Plekhanov Institute of National Economy); he began his career and was (which is especially interesting in connection with the current statements of G.A. Yavlinsky) Komsomol activist? Or the logic is this: who remembers the old ... Although even this does not work for Yavlinsky, as he insists on taking into account historical factors.
About them - for dessert from Grigory Alekseevich: "priorities", where again about the "illegitimacy" of the Bolsheviks, about the need to restore relations with Ukraine, about the state "for the people." There are also points about anti-corruption and the creation of a Constituent Assembly. The latter reads:
Is this a joke? .. By the way, thanks to Yavlinsky, she began her walk back in 2011. "To restore continuity with historical Russia, it is necessary ... All-Russian Constituent Assembly." So if you “restore historical continuity,” such a Constituent Assembly will have to hold one meeting, which for him will immediately and be the last with an immortal “guard! Tired!” Well, as in 1918, with shouts, scuffles, clanging weapons, the final creation of warring with each other "directories", etc.
What if Yavlinsky is not joking ...
Grigory Alekseevich’s website, which broadcasts in two languages (Russian and English), has become a platform on which the presidential candidate preparing to celebrate his 65 anniversary, has shared his program with the public. This program will be devoted to this material, which opens the cycle with the publication of the programs of all those who are nominated for participation in the upcoming elections (2018) as a candidate.
For reference: Grigory Yavlinsky, according to his personal statistics, will try “presidential” happiness for the third time. Previous results are as follows:
1996 year - Yavlinsky gains 7,34% of votes, taking the total 4 place;
2000 year - with 5,8% of the votes, the leader of the Yabloko party takes the third place after Vladimir Putin and Gennady Zyuganov.
What is going on now?
The new program (aka platform) of Yavlinsky, presented the other day, consists of three main sections, named as follows: “Urgent actions”, “Main goals” and “Priorities”. Already the name alone makes shrug. It is not entirely clear, will the priority tasks be solved before the commission of urgent actions, or both, after the “main goals”? In general, everything important, urgent and top priority is such a platform.
So, if hypothetically admit that Grigory Yavlinsky not only registered as a candidate for the presidency of the Russian Federation, but also won the elections in March 2018, then we should consider what he is preparing for us - ordinary citizens of the country.
As mentioned urgent actions, Grigoriy Alekseevich (hereinafter referred to as “pokitatno”): “will stop the state lie”, “will cancel repressive anti-civil laws”, “will release political prisoners”, “will stop military-political adventures”, “will refuse confrontation with Europe and the world” “Normalizes relations with Ukraine”.
Remarkably, isn't it? That's just the impression that such statements are not meant for Russian citizens, but for external “consumption”. A sort of advertising for those who are willing to invest in the presidential campaign 2018 in Russia with the aim to caress the candidate advantageous for themselves.
The statement itself “to give up confrontation with Europe and the world” looks like a fairy tale about a white bull — against the background that since the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, Europe and some countries of the world have not refused to confront us. If Grigory Alekseevich forgot himself, then he needs to be reminded of the promises made by partners in this form: “You support the unification of Germany, and we will not move NATO’s infrastructure east a single step.” Well, where are those promises?
Who launched the confrontation - Russia or all those who unilaterally withdrew from the fundamental treaties? For example, the treaty on the limitation of missile defense systems, from which the United States came out in 2002 year. Why did they “go in the same person” without accepting Russian attempts to clarify the situation? Oh, yes ... - they came up with a fable about the Iranian threat ... but so far no documents of "nondirectionality" against the Russian Federation have been provided.
It is worth reminding Grigoriy Alekseevich that at that time Russia had rather warm relations with Ukraine, and the partnership with the USA was conducted in virtually all areas (from supporting the operation carried out in Afghanistan by US troops to concluding contracts in the field of energy). So who started the confrontation, and why does Russia need to give it up with regard to the fact that the West is not going to refuse it? .. Russia would have refused the confrontation with pleasure, but the process should be two-sided, as they have already dealt with verbal promises ”and M. Gorbachev's joyful nodding. Yavlinsky has no word about it.
Further - “normalization of relations with Ukraine”. It is also an excellent point of the platform in all respects, especially considering that Ukraine is not capable of normalizing relations within itself today. They can not fulfill their own obligations, they are hammering out of all calibres in the long-suffering Donbas, arranging all kinds of blockades. The Nazis march through the streets and squares with torches in their hands, persecute those who opposed the Maidan, carry out demonstrative reprisals against those who are not yet able to resist them. So who is Grigory Alekseevich going to normalize relations with? With Poroshenko, whose rating fell below 12%, or with Rada, the percentage of approval of the activities of which from the population is completely below the "plinth". With whom?
"Main goals" from Yavlinsky:
Protection of life and dignity of man and citizen.
The rigorous implementation of the principles of inviolability of the person, inviolability of the home, inviolability of private property.
Union:
- people on the basis of man-saving and respect for the person;
- society and the state, separated by a totalitarian and authoritarian model of relations;
- stories a country torn by lawless Bolshevik rule.
The rigorous implementation of the principles of inviolability of the person, inviolability of the home, inviolability of private property.
Union:
- people on the basis of man-saving and respect for the person;
- society and the state, separated by a totalitarian and authoritarian model of relations;
- stories a country torn by lawless Bolshevik rule.
And here Mr. Yavlinsky contradicts himself. On the one hand, he is going to unite the people "on the basis of respect for man" and immediately declares the times of the existence of the USSR "lawless rule." And the fact that millions of Russian citizens have a completely different, in contrast to Yavlinsky, view of “Bolshevik rule” doesn’t bother Grigori Alekseevich? And doesn’t he be embarrassed by the fact that it was under the “lawless Bolshevik rule” that he received an education (not at all in the ordinary higher educational institution of the country — the Plekhanov Institute of National Economy); he began his career and was (which is especially interesting in connection with the current statements of G.A. Yavlinsky) Komsomol activist? Or the logic is this: who remembers the old ... Although even this does not work for Yavlinsky, as he insists on taking into account historical factors.
About them - for dessert from Grigory Alekseevich: "priorities", where again about the "illegitimacy" of the Bolsheviks, about the need to restore relations with Ukraine, about the state "for the people." There are also points about anti-corruption and the creation of a Constituent Assembly. The latter reads:
After a century of powerlessness, Russia needs a state re-foundation. This will be possible only with the active participation of the majority of citizens, otherwise no power will be truly legitimate. The question of the specific form of government (parliamentary or presidential republic, the distribution of powers between the branches of government) and the peculiarities of the political system can only be decided by the people as a whole as a result of a serious national debate. In order to break the chain of lawlessness and not only declaratively, but practically restore continuity with historical Russianeed to start preparation for the convocation of the popularly elected All-Russian Constituent Assembly XXI century. This is one of the most important missions of the future president.
Is this a joke? .. By the way, thanks to Yavlinsky, she began her walk back in 2011. "To restore continuity with historical Russia, it is necessary ... All-Russian Constituent Assembly." So if you “restore historical continuity,” such a Constituent Assembly will have to hold one meeting, which for him will immediately and be the last with an immortal “guard! Tired!” Well, as in 1918, with shouts, scuffles, clanging weapons, the final creation of warring with each other "directories", etc.
What if Yavlinsky is not joking ...
- Alexei Volodin
- https://www.facebook.com/Czernov
Information