The newest helicopter carrier 22DDH "Heisei 22" type "Hyuga" will start to build in Japan

31
In Japan, the construction of a third Hyuga type helicopter carrier - 22DH “Heisei 22” is planned. Today, the Japanese Navy has two such ships - Hyuga 16DDH (tail number DDH-181) and Ise 18DDH (tail number DDH-182).

The newest helicopter carrier 22DDH "Heisei 22" type "Hyuga" will start to build in Japan


The new ship got its name in honor of 22's Emperor Akihito's reign. Hensi - this Japanese era, which began with the reign of the current Emperor. In late January, according to media reports, Japan approved a decision on the financing of the construction of a new ship. A light aircraft carrier or helicopter carrier, or a helicopter destroyer, or even a multi-purpose landing craft - all this can be said about Hugue-class ships. Although the standard displacement for ships of this class is 13 900 tons, and the length - 197 meters, the new ship will have a displacement of slightly more than 19 thousand tons, and it will have a length of 248 meters. Approximately join the ranks of the Japanese Navy in 2015 year. The cost of a new project is a little over one billion dollars. Matured to the construction of the ship in Japan just in time for the final stage of construction of the Chinese aircraft carrier. The Chinese are building an aircraft carrier with a length of 320 meters and 50-th fighters on board, while on the "Heisei 22" the Japanese are going to install modern systems weapons and management of American production. According to unofficial data, the ship will be provided with the SeaRAM Mk-15 Mod 31 anti-aircraft missile system, 11-and container performance, from the American company Reyteon. The data of the air defense missile system today have only American ships, for example “LCS-2”.



Japan made a decision to build light aircraft carriers for helicopters a long time ago, and although such ships are considered less reliable protection than attack aircraft carriers, the decision to build the newest destroyer - a helicopter carrier is connected, first of all, with the buildup of China’s underwater fleet. Basically, anti-submarine defense helicopters will be based on the Heisei 22.

In Japan, in connection with the ever-growing military potential of China, they begin to talk about the deep modification of this project to accommodate a deck-based jet aviation. I would like to note here that Japan announced the basing of 14 PLO helicopters on the ship. But foreign analogues, for example, Cavour, are provided with 16 aircraft and 8 helicopters. So, most likely, Japan deliberately “understates” not only the class of the ship, but also the possibility of deploying an air group. If you look at such a small aircraft carrier, you can easily place 20-30 fighter jets on board, and given the purchase of modern weapons and equipment from the United States and the absence of catapults, it is likely that Japan can buy American-made F-35Bs at any time and provide them with a new destroyer-helicopter carrier. It should be noted that with the commissioning of a new ship, the naval forces of Japan will become the second after the United States in power at sea, and the personnel of the Japanese Navy is only 45 thousand sailors.

In addition to the development of the Navy, in Japan there is a rapid development of the Air Force. New UAVs and fighter jets are being built. So, the ATD-X fighter, the start of construction of which has been going on intermittently since 2004, will be ready in 2014. Approximate adoption in the Air Force - 2016 year. In 2009, 40 billion yen is poured into the project. In service is already a new unmanned helicopter, 4 unmanned vehicles are under development. In 2012, 15 billion yen will be allocated to the development of the UAV.



The purpose of the light aircraft carrier 22DDH "Heisei 22"
The ships of this class were planned as a replacement for the destroyers of the Haruna class of helicopter carriers. The purpose of "Heisei 22" - the protection and defense of various kinds of compounds of ships, opposition to enemy submarine forces, the flagship. The ship is capable of moving thousands of paratroopers and around 4-trucks to the landing site of the 50. The project of the ship is called "Destroyer 19000t". It is likely to receive the tail number of the DDH-183.

Key Features:
- displacement 19.5 thousand tons;
- length 248 meters;
- 38 meters;
- speed of 30 knots;
- draft 7.5 meters;
- 4 COGAG propulsion systems.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    11 February 2012 09: 03
    Japan made a decision to build light aircraft carriers for helicopters a long time ago, and although such ships are considered less reliable protection than attack aircraft carriers, the decision to build the latest destroyer - a helicopter carrier, is primarily associated with the buildup of China's submarine fleet

    But for actions against TF, it’s just right, for that it is so universal and landing.

    Such a small aircraft carrier, if you figure it out, can easily place 20-30 fighter jets on board, and taking into account the purchase of modern weapons and equipment from the United States and the lack of catapults, it is likely that Japan can buy American-made deck-based F-35Bs at any time provide them with a new destroyer-helicopter carrier


    Only for the placement of f-35b it is intended, in the final version
    1. Skiff
      0
      11 February 2012 10: 58
      Cheap and cheerful, our answer may be that!

      Now, Russian developers have taken a revolutionary step - they put ship missiles in a standard container and achieved their autonomous launch. And this fundamentally changes the tactics and strategy of using missiles.

      • At the same time, formally, Club-K missiles are not subject to any restrictions. Their flight range is up to 250-300 km, and they are not even ballistic, but winged. The Americans themselves, at one time, took cruise missiles out of the scope of missile technology export restriction treaties — now they are reaping the benefits.

      • What frightened the Club-K of Pentagon military experts? In principle, there is nothing supernovae in the combat and technological plan - the complex “shoots” with subsonic cruise missiles of various modifications (even the 3M54E is subsonic - only the last 20-30 km of its shock part passes through 3M supersound to effectively overcome powerful air defense and create a large kinetic effect on a large target). The system allows you to hit sea and ground targets at a distance of 200-300 km from the launch point, including aircraft carriers - but it is not Wunderwaffe in itself.
      1. nonsense
        +2
        11 February 2012 12: 28
        our answer may be like that!

        don't be confused carrier weapons and weapons ....
  2. +4
    11 February 2012 09: 58
    As for the basing of the F-35B, it is very doubtful that the Americans faced the problem that its jet stream "burns" the deck. If the ships were originally planned not even for the "Hariera" (unlike the American ones), then such a constructive flaw simply cannot be overcome. And in general, the fate of the "vertical" is a big question ...
    1. 0
      11 February 2012 11: 02
      no one de facto will reveal to us the secret of the thickness of the flight deck. even photos can be duck. but the fact that they land on the deck, burning it with a jet stream, plus piling on weight is a problem. If this is a "pure helicopter carrier" ship, then after a series of landings of fighters, the deck will be like a golf course .... if the deck is made "for a fighter too," then there is such a puff pie that you can compare with armor, and this weight of the building. and the catapult is not placed there, judging by the sisterships. (although it can be argued that it is not needed)
      wait and see
    2. Sergh
      0
      11 February 2012 11: 08
      Therefore, double saturation. If F-35V is not given, then helicopters will be accurate. And with the deck, this is not such a heavy problem, another thing, problems with verticals. But the fact is that the Mistrals will still be useful to us, if people build them and do not refuse, then the landing will now be planted in honor to the neighbors, or in the future, for example.
      1. 0
        11 February 2012 11: 55
        Will come in handy. "A useful load does not pull your pocket, especially if you are in a car" (saying of tourists - jeepers)
  3. Jaguar
    0
    11 February 2012 11: 27
    "But foreign counterparts, for example, Cavour, are provided with 16 aircraft and 8 helicopters. So, most likely, Japan deliberately" underestimates "not only the class of the ship, but also the possibility of placing an air group. Such a small aircraft carrier, if you figure it out, can easily accommodate on board 20-30 jet fighters "well" Cavour has 7000 tons more displacement. And Harier is smaller than the F-35
  4. 0
    11 February 2012 11: 43
    It is interesting to compare it with Mistral in terms of characteristics
    1. snek
      0
      11 February 2012 12: 09
      These are different types of ships. Mistral, in addition to being a helicopter carrier, is also a landing ship and a control ship. So it's hard to compare
    2. +2
      11 February 2012 15: 51
      Quote: Forward
      compare with Mistral

      For comparison, UDC like "Osumi", of which there are 3 pieces, one more is under construction.

      Ships of the Osumi class have a flat and elongated deck like an aircraft carrier, 178 meters long and 26 meters wide. It is used as a platform for two combat helicopters, but experts point out that the ship may well be equipped with vertical take-off and landing aircraft.

      Like the American universal amphibious assault ships, a dock chamber is located in the stern of the Osumi, which has two American LCAC air-cushion landing craft or a corresponding number of conventional landing craft. The tank hold adjacent to the dock chamber can hold up to ten main battle tanks or 1400 tons of cargo. For a long time, up to 330 marines can be on the landing ship. If we are talking only about transportation over relatively short distances and about the landing of troops, then the ship is capable of taking on board a unit of up to 1000 soldiers and officers. Thus, if before the commissioning of the Osumi ships, the amphibious forces of Japan were rated at two infantry regiments, then after the construction of all four universal amphibious assault ships of the Osumi class, the Japanese Navy will be able to transfer by sea and land on the coast an entire infantry division with reinforcements.
  5. -1
    11 February 2012 12: 14
    something TTX of this Japanese is not all right. and wider by 10m and longer by 50m and the tonnage is the same as that of the mistral. With such a tonnage, there is definitely no deck apron, and therefore the virtalcalk cannot be based here. WHERE IS THAT WE LIE.
    1. +1
      11 February 2012 12: 26
      Look at Dock-Do, there is a more successful layout than the Mistral and the Hyuga type.
      1. +1
        11 February 2012 13: 18
        You can link to the internal layout.
        the fact that he is a "better project" is a very controversial statement
        when USC tried to push through the idea of ​​buying DOK-DO, there was overwhelming desire to make money on an EMPTY pelvis. For the USC had joint projects with the Koreans. Pindos call this "lobby"
    2. Jaguar
      0
      11 February 2012 13: 05
      Quote: core
      then the TTX of this Japanese is not all right. and wider by 10m and longer by 50m and the tonnage is the same as that of the mistral
      Japanese 3000 tons more
      1. +1
        11 February 2012 13: 42
        maybe there are less bulkheads and decks laughing and steel is thinner
      2. 0
        11 February 2012 14: 16
        three thousand is not critical, the dimensions are very different, and the weight is somehow wrong.
  6. ivan79
    0
    11 February 2012 12: 15
    on the basis of the mistral it will be possible to build something similar (destroyer-helicopter carrier PLO) - I am not talking about the simple replacement of the helicopter group with the ka-27 (although as an ersatz version this can also be done with the mistral + a pair of frigates - a full-fledged anti-submarine grouping and, if even a kuzu (with an enlarged air group due to helicopters) add here with kirov and a couple of bpc, here you and the AUG well, and a couple of pl will not interfere in this company) and the construction of a full-fledged project, but this, as I think, no earlier than 2020 needs to be reanimated too much .
    1. +1
      11 February 2012 13: 36
      judging by the declared units, serial ships, then in 4 years we will have a "semblance of 3" AUG (don't throw stones at me, I'm exaggerating)
      another question is why Russia needs AUG, in the classical sense, if we loudly declare self-defense (almost in the manner of the Japanese, although we were not won and were not spelled out in the constitution)
  7. suharev-52
    +1
    11 February 2012 12: 36
    Do not be surprised that the Japanese are taking measures to strengthen their marine component. With two such powers at hand, such as Russia and China, which is gaining strength. In addition, one should not forget that Japan has territorial claims with both Russia and China. That is why militarization is taking place in the Far East. And in this case, after the destruction of our military infrastructure, we look pale against our potential opponents. We also need to increase our Pacific Fleet.
  8. ivan79
    0
    11 February 2012 16: 28
    .. why Russia is precisely AUG, in the classical sense ... 1) Politics, the so-called. projection of force (the blacksmiths were sent to practice and then there was so much negativity from the west, and if only a full-fledged AUG came to Syria, for example, for a long time (until Assad finished off the last opposition, I exaggerate smile ) then this is a completely different scenario.

    2) To cover the full deployment of submarines
  9. ivan79
    +1
    11 February 2012 17: 13
    classic AUGs are needed and not 4

    I found it: ... however, at the present time it is expected that by 2027 the Navy will receive two carrier groups - one in the Pacific Fleet and one in the North.
    Now the Russian military is busy forming the terms of reference for a promising aircraft carrier. According to preliminary data, the ship will be nuclear-powered, since when equipped with diesel power plants, the aircraft carrier will require a large amount of fuel. The final design of the ship will be ready by 2017, and in 2023 the first aircraft carrier will be launched. To save money, the new aircraft carrier will be built according to a modular scheme at two enterprises of the United Shipbuilding Corporation with the final assembly of ready-made modules at the Severodvinsk Sevmash.

    By the time the first aircraft carrier ship is launched, the Navy must complete the formation of an escort force. It is expected to include missile cruisers, destroyers, multipurpose submarines, frigates, corvettes, landing ships and support vessels. In total, each carrier group will include 15 ships, not counting the aircraft carriers themselves. Currently, USC is building new frigates, corvettes, and is also designing a destroyer and is developing restoration projects for missile cruisers in reserve.

    In addition to the formation of carrier groups, the Navy will also be engaged in the construction of new bases for their support, as well as the creation of a ground-based simulator for deck aviation in the city of Yeysk in the Krasnodar Territory.

    But they are needed: a) politics, the so-called. force projection, b) to cover the deployment of submarines
    1. 0
      11 February 2012 19: 34
      Can I link to a source in the studio?
    2. 0
      11 February 2012 19: 36
      All this is wonderful, but according to our commander-in-chief, Admiral Vysotsky, a promising ship of this class will not be a classic aircraft carrier. This ship will have to provide combat operations in different environments, air, space, surface and underwater environments. It is required to build a combined carrier that solves a number of "all-medium" problems. Speaking about the classic aircraft carrier, the admiral stressed that they offer here either an improved Kuznetsov or a worsened Nimitz, which, it must be understood, is long out of date for us. Like this. As for the timing, if the final project is ready by 2017, then 2023 is the year of commissioning, a very, very optimistic period, given that the lead ship takes longer to build, and our ships of this class usually took 9 years to build. Try to imagine classic AUGs with a "non-classic" aircraft carrier. Apparently, the creation of aircraft-carrying cruisers is being continued in our country, further removing the aircraft carrier from its immediate tasks. By 2023 or 2027, a lot, of course, can change, but aviation at sea will remain, and, consequently, the classic aircraft carrier, whose main task is not to wage a nuclear war, but to prevent it. The Japanese and Chinese look at this more sensibly, do not create "space carriers", but build real ships.
      1. +1
        12 February 2012 16: 43
        Why is the "space carrier" not needed?
        If, say, the fleet will conduct military operations in the tropics, and local satellites do not fly over the territory of Russia, where it has weapons.
        (And it is expensive to shoot down satellites with Soyuz and Protons)
        The "space carrier" must have inexpensive means of destroying satellites, so as not to be "in full view" of the enemy and still threaten to harm commercial infrastructure.
        Or even shoot down ballistic missiles.
        Then no one will touch him and there will be no war.
        1. 0
          13 February 2012 22: 07
          The problem is, Andrey_K, that when they start shooting down satellites, it means the beginning of a global nuclear war, and no "space carrier" - an aircraft carrier, especially in piece versions, will be able to live even an hour. If you mean spacecraft tracking ships, then the USSR had them, though they did not belong to the Navy, but to the Academy of Sciences. This is a different topic, like the American Aegis missile defense system, which requires dozens of deployed ships with these missiles to function effectively. The task of an aircraft carrier, both strike and multipurpose, is to participate in local conflicts, where it will dominate, and thereby PREVENT A GLOBAL war. In a global nuclear war, the entire surface fleet will most likely be destroyed in a short time, especially aircraft carriers.
  10. ivan79
    0
    11 February 2012 20: 09
    delved into a modular construction scheme and on one site (military-analytical-news) found this news as I recall dated November 2011 And I don’t remember which site sad
    1. 0
      11 February 2012 20: 29
      it happens to me too, no matter how hard I try to bookmark "special articles" ....
  11. ivan79
    0
    11 February 2012 20: 35
    By the way about satellites for intelligence of the Navy (well, I think for n 700) posted in the mistral
  12. 755962
    +2
    11 February 2012 23: 38
    It should be noted that with the commissioning of a new ship, the naval forces of Japan will become second after the United States in power at sea, and the personnel of the Japanese Navy is only 45 thousand sailors.
    There is something to strive for, we must also take into account the fact that all this power is focused on Pacific Fleet.
    1. 0
      13 February 2012 15: 42
      and a little to China
  13. Odesit
    -1
    14 February 2012 23: 39
    Two rockets and the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. CREW will not save.