Servicemen of tank divisions of the Southern Military District master T-72BM

21
Tankmen of combined arms units deployed in the Southern Military District on the territory of the Chechen Republic master the modernized Tanks T-72BM, which entered the troops of the Southern Military District at the end of 2011. According to the press service of the Southern Military District, the tanks are equipped with the latest missile and cannon weapons, modern means of communication and effective fire control systems.

At the Kalinovsky and Guardsman training complexes, in conditions as close as possible to the combat, with tankmen, tactical, technical, fire training and driving lessons are held.

The objectives of the field activities: mastering the operation of the upgraded tank and the development of its "innovations"; reinforcement of crews professional skills; tank maneuver training in fire; improvement of the actions of each crew member in his specialty.

In the course of training, driver mechanics will have to learn to confidently overcome difficult obstacles and limited passages in mine explosive barriers. Operator operators should be able to not only find targets, but also determine the possibility of their defeat. The tank commanders have to learn to make the right decisions depending on the situation. It should be noted that the situation leaders will constantly become more complex.

Classes are held both during the day and at night. In the near future, tankers will have to be coordinated as part of tank platoons and companies. The battalion tactical doctrine will complete combat training at this stage.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    21 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. Evil Tatar
      +12
      10 February 2012 14: 38
      The armor is strong, and our tanks are fast ...
      Sing, and everything is immediately clear.
      When the harsh hour of war comes
      And he will send us to attack Rodin ...
      1. +1
        10 February 2012 20: 06
        As a tanker, I am especially pleased that the crews are not just engaged in the maintenance of equipment. Finally, the fathers of the commanders began to engage in real combat training and the coherence of the crews. With the growth of skill, the crews will really use all the capabilities of military equipment, terrain folds, etc. Not only the performance of a combat mission, but also their own survival depends on the skill and experience of the crew. When new models of military equipment enter the troops, it will be easier to master them. For the future, I would like for tankers to master their skills in cooperation with BMPT (tank support combat vehicles), infantry, attack aircraft, etc. In general, the news is cool. bully
    2. swat2238
      +7
      10 February 2012 14: 50
      It’s a pity that it’s not the T-90, but still better than nothing!
      1. Sergh
        +4
        10 February 2012 14: 55
        The southern district is filled up specifically with technology. What are they planning? Cunningly somehow.
        1. H1dRUS
          +6
          10 February 2012 15: 00
          it is necessary to take into account that this is not the most peaceful and safe region, high population density, many neighbors, both friendly and not very friendly. I hope most of the T72 tanks are modernized rather than written off for scrap metal. There are no unnecessary tanks
      2. kPoJluK2008
        +9
        10 February 2012 15: 03
        T-72BM - this is essentially the T-90 ..
        1. PLO
          +3
          10 February 2012 17: 57
          only have a problem

          on the tower to the left of the gun there is no dynamic protection, and their engines are old 840-strong, instead of the new 1000-strong, i.e. in mobility they are inferior to the tanks that they replaced

          hz, maybe they fixed it at the moment, but at the time these tanks arrived in the South-Eastern Military District, such information was slipping
      3. beech
        +3
        10 February 2012 17: 32
        But is this modification far behind the t-90A?
        1. ANTK
          -11
          10 February 2012 17: 39
          Quote: beech
          But is this modification far behind the t-90A?

          Behind, but depending on how you look. But in fact - everything is old.
          1. PLO
            +6
            10 February 2012 18: 02
            don’t be puffed, they won’t appreciate you here

            in fact, in battle, there probably is no difference, because the T-72bm and T-90ms LMS are the same, but in operation it’s possible
    3. ANTK
      -7
      10 February 2012 14: 59
      What kind of BM finally do not enlighten?
      1. ANTK
        -1
        10 February 2012 19: 18
        T-72BA, even Ethiopians buy these better from us:
    4. 0
      10 February 2012 15: 01
      The tanks are probably good .. but why the modernization and not the new ones .. For example, the 90-e? It is clear that the tanks in the modern war lost the significance that they had in the Second World War, but still this is armor ... And having at least one tank to fight , but not BMP or armored personnel carrier as it is calmer
      1. +10
        10 February 2012 16: 42
        domokl ------ Tank troops will never lose their significance. So to argue, this means tongue wagging without accurate analysis. And did you even see the tank in reality, sat on the ground crew members? Maybe then it would have figured out what kind of power is in it. And it’s not a matter of calm. The main thing is a belief in their weapons, the determination of tankers to successfully carry out any combat missions.
    5. Vrangel
      +7
      10 February 2012 15: 03
      Do you know that
      The near abroad is 8-16 hours on the tank! :)
    6. dred
      0
      10 February 2012 15: 06
      Cool to say.
    7. Russian sniper
      +5
      10 February 2012 15: 15
      Modernization is good.)) But it is not advisable to completely stop the purchase of T-90)) If it so happened and decided to modernize the T-72 fleet, so let them buy small quantities of T-90 and the troops are good and the plant can teach youth tank building)) drinks
      1. Argentum
        +4
        10 February 2012 15: 46
        Why buy a T-90 at all? Right now, the Taman division is fully equipped with the T-90. And the T-72BM, as the T-90 wrote earlier, but the roofing felts are smaller, the roofing felts are weaker. Right now, all the emphasis on armature and T-99 (new tank)
        1. ANTK
          -3
          10 February 2012 15: 59
          Quote: Argentum
          Right now, the Taman division is fully equipped with the T-90

          90А
          Quote: Argentum
          And the T-72BM, as the T-90 wrote earlier, but the roofing felts are smaller, the roofing felts are weaker. Right now, all the emphasis on armature and T-99 (new tank)

          not BM, but BA
      2. +6
        10 February 2012 16: 44
        Advise this to the Minister of Defense. Maybe you can find a common language.
    8. Eugene
      +1
      10 February 2012 15: 31
      Amusing modernization, the anti-cumulative screens are practically absent, in the frontal part of the tower, around the gun, two DZ blocks regretted.

      But there is only one in this.
      1. ANTK
        -7
        10 February 2012 15: 59
        Quote: Eugene
        Funny modernization, anti-cumulative screens are practically absent, in the frontal part of the tower, around the guns, two DZ blocks regretted. But there is only one in this.

        T-72 is T-72.
      2. grizzlir
        0
        10 February 2012 18: 47
        There is enough protection in the frontal projection of the tower and without DZ, you can catch ATGMs without any special consequences.
    9. +4
      10 February 2012 15: 54
      It is a pity that Tagil is not being bought. And what if things don't work out with "Armata" or we don't have time, but we get involved in something? Modernization of the T-72 will not be enough ...
      1. ANTK
        -6
        10 February 2012 17: 40
        Quote: aktanir
        And what if things don't work out with "Armata" or we don't have time, but we get involved in something?

        I feel that they will jinx it ...
    10. ANTK
      -7
      10 February 2012 17: 44
      And it’s interesting what kind of motor they plan to Armata ...

      Yes and MTO what French will be?
      1. takmagash
        +4
        10 February 2012 18: 38
        The motor will most likely be 12n360: an X-shaped 4-stroke 12-cylinder diesel engine with a capacity of 1500 hp. at 2000 rpm This engine was installed on an experimental T-95 tank. According to the test results of the tank, there were no complaints about the engine. At the moment, this is the smallest tank diesel in the world of similar power.
        1. ANTK
          -6
          10 February 2012 18: 53
          takmagash,
          Murzilki
        2. gor
          gor
          -4
          10 February 2012 19: 31
          a massive engine has a longer service life. As the dimensions are reduced and the power is increased, the load on the parts increases. See the engine of formula 1 and find out how long it lasts
    11. grizzlir
      +4
      10 February 2012 18: 44
      We have an army on conscription. We have the fact that our servicemen begin to master equipment twice a year. My dream is to master military equipment at the beginning of the service, and in the future only improve combat skills and retrain for new weapons.
    12. +1
      11 February 2012 01: 05
      gor,
      not always, do you think they will design a tank with a resource for one race on a tank?
    13. gor
      gor
      -2
      11 February 2012 11: 09
      it’s just that there are laws of physics and you won’t get anywhere. Reducing the size always leads to a decrease in the resource. That's why turbocharged engines have a lesser resource than atmospheric ones, but more power with an equal volume

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"