New 2017 Weapons: Remington RP9 Pistol

51
Armory Remington is mainly known for its guns and rifles, but this year, at the SHOT Show 2017, it demonstrated a rather interesting pistol, positioned as a weapon for law enforcement agencies. The manufacturer considers the main features of this gun to be high reliability, ease of handling and constant combat readiness with sufficient security. Given the fact that Remington, of short-barreled weapons, is best known for its variations on the Colt 1911 theme, the new pistol looks more than interesting.

If you evaluate the RP9 pistol in appearance, then there is absolutely nothing remarkable in it, such weapons are shown annually in dozens, and if it does not find its niche, then it is often forgotten. However, the arms company Remington is a large enough and well-known manufacturer who can not only make good weapons, but also provide them with enough advertising to get them interested in the police and the army. What will come of this, time will tell, in the meantime, the company has secured itself by adjusting the production of stores of reduced capacity in order to fit into the restrictions for the civilian market.



Despite the unremarkable appearance of the weapon, on closer examination some details attract attention. One of these parts - the back pad on the handle of the gun. This item is interchangeable, fixed pin. By replacing this lining, the gun can be adapted to the size of the palm of the arrow. This possibility is clearly not superfluous, especially since interchangeable pads of three different sizes are supplied with the gun.

The second remarkable feature is that the gun has duplicated controls on both sides of the weapon. Thus, the shutter delay button is located on the left and on the right, and the button for extracting the magazine can be rearranged to either side. Such two-sidedness makes the weapon equally convenient for both left-handers and right-handers. The lever for disassembling the weapon is located only on the left side.

A lot of questions are caused by the absence of some controls that are familiar to most pistols. There is not even a hint of a fuse switch on the weapon; all the obvious safety devices are limited only by the automatic safety on the trigger of the weapon. This is explained by the fact that the designers of the Remington company tried to make their pistol constantly ready for use without delay, that is, they pulled out and fired according to the principle. At the same time, attention was paid to the safety of weapons.

The whole secret, which has long been a secret and is found in many other models of pistols, lies in the trigger mechanism. The trigger mechanism of a pistol Remington RP9 drumnik, only double action. Thus, each shot is self-cocked with the effort of pressing the trigger. Despite the fact that when the trigger is pressed, the shooter compresses the mainspring, the pressing force does not exceed 3 kgf. It is also possible to adjust the triggering force, it can be reduced to 2,5 kgf, but this will lead to a larger trigger travel.

The Remington RP9 pistol has an indicator of the presence of a cartridge in the chamber, which is realized as a painted surface on the ejector, which becomes visible when the weapon is in combat readiness.

Thus, if you insert a magazine into the gun and ottyanuv bolt to send the cartridge into the chamber, then for a shot it will be enough just to pull the trigger. At the same time, the gun remains safe for continuous wear, as long as the automatic safety key is not pressed and the trigger is squeezed, the shot will not occur. With an adequate level of training and responsibility, the shooter of these means of protection from an accidental shot is enough.

Separately, it is worth mentioning that, despite the rather small effort of pressing the trigger, shooting with a self-coil will still affect the accuracy of the fire, which can be attributed to the minuses of the gun. It would be much more logical to equip the pistol with a double-action trigger mechanism and to provide a key for safe descent of the drummer. This would make the gun more convenient, and the complexity of the design would be insignificant.

Once the conversation turned to the accuracy of firing, it would be unfair not to mention aiming devices. The standard version of the weapon is equipped with the simplest one and the front sight with light-accumulating points. Both elements can be replaced with more convenient ones for the shooter. Instead of the rear sight, you can install a collimator sight. Additionally, the gun can be equipped with a laser target designator or a flashlight, for which there is a seat in front of the safety bracket.

The system of automatic weapons built on the scheme using the recoil energy in the short course of the barrel. Disengagement of the barrel with the cover-bolt is due to the distortion of the breech. The distortion of the trunk is due to the figure cut in the tide under the chamber.

Due to the fact that the gun has a polymer frame, its weight without ammunition is 750 grams. A weapon shop can hold 18 9x19 or 10 ammunition for the civilian market. Gun barrel length - 114 millimeters, thickness - 32 millimeter, height - 141 millimeter.

Thanks to the well-thought-out design of the weapon, as well as the use of parts, the release of which has already been adjusted, the cost of the weapon was reduced to a minimum. At the moment, a pistol with two shops costs only 489 US dollars.

The excellent characteristics of the weapon, the common cartridge and the constant combat readiness of the gun can cause the weapon to really take its place in the police or army. An important role in this issue can play a low price gun. But you should not write off other models of weapons from other manufacturers, since this year there are a lot of new pistols, which are predicted to have a great future.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    20 March 2017 06: 20
    Glocky gun, nothing like that. Although the lack of a non-automatic fuse annoying. I wouldn’t take a gun for myself, whose fuses are only automatic.
    Instead of a rear sight, you can install a collimator sight

    Gun with collimator belay . Monsieur knows a lot about perversions wassat . Still optical would add laughing
    1. +10
      20 March 2017 07: 49
      + tactical flashlight + laser rangefinder + stereo headphones .... bully
      1. +5
        20 March 2017 08: 57
        Add: this gun is also available in .45 ACP caliber, has the designation RP-45 and a magazine for 15 rounds.
      2. +4
        20 March 2017 09: 57
        This is a real "toilet-sofa-bleed."
      3. +4
        20 March 2017 10: 55
        Ballistic calculator forgot laughing
    2. +3
      20 March 2017 09: 28
      Almost two times cheaper than Glock or Zig Sauer. That is noteworthy.
    3. +2
      20 March 2017 10: 16
      Yes, I do not recognize the collimator at all, I cannot use it, although many people say that it is much more convenient. And the fact that such an opportunity is necessary to note)
      1. +3
        24 August 2017 04: 05
        The collimator is practically unsuitable for shooting. It significantly delays the time on aiming and shot. The red dot scatters shots depending on whether it is centered on the collimator or offset. To shoot from the dark on a light background, the point is not visible, in rain or drizzle, dew, it simply does not work. There is always a chance that he will loosen or loose, or the shooting will be lost. A good collimator in the range costs from 300 to 1000 dollars. You can get used to the collimator, but it is always an additional unknown to fix which time may not be there. Conclusion .... COLIMATOR SIGHTS ON THE GUNS OF PRACTICAL SHOOTING are useless, senseless, expensive and simply dangerous for military use. And Remington in the article is just another freak fading after the former power of the company.
    4. +1
      20 March 2017 13: 14
      Quote: Comrade_Stalin
      Glocky gun, nothing like that.

      Glock has a partial self-recharge. Those. it is either convenient or reliable in any way.
      Quote: Comrade_Stalin
      Gun with collimator

      And practitioners have a reason for this. Tasks have become more difficult - you need to quickly aim and shoot accurately in motion and from uncomfortable positions. Here it’s difficult with an assault rifle, but with a pistol and its kutsey the aim line will have to aim at the bar altogether - it is almost impossible to set and hold an even fly. Meanwhile, the distances are the same, but the goals have become smaller - 5x5, for example. In practice, this means an arm, leg, or weapon leaning out of the shelter. With the usual sights for such a situation no matter how you train, you won’t get any sense.
      1. +4
        20 March 2017 13: 34
        Come on. No one is going to an assault or a battle with a gun. If you need to hit a small target, it is much easier and more efficient to fill it with a burst of a dozen bullets. Moreover, the pistol is a melee weapon: from 5 to 25 m maximum, and there simply has no time to aim there, you need to get intuitively and take 2-3 shots at once, for sure.
        1. +2
          20 March 2017 15: 34
          No one is going to an assault or a battle with a gun.

          Well why. The first in the assault group comes with a shield and a gun.
          1. +1
            21 March 2017 00: 06
            Well why. The first in the assault group comes with a shield and a gun.

            This first one is used as a ram, he holds a shield with his left hand and a pistol with his right hand. It is clear that he needs a weapon that can be used with only one hand. But behind him are just the same armed with machine guns, not pistols.
          2. 0
            21 March 2017 10: 34
            Quote: glory1974
            The first in the assault group comes with a shield and a gun.

            It was like that at first. As a one-handed weapon, there were only two options, PMM and APS. So it was necessary for a comrade with a shield to take the APS in his hand. But what if PP-2000 were available, for example?
            1. +2
              21 March 2017 17: 51
              . But what if PP-2000 were available, for example?

              Depending on the tasks. If the hostage is released, only the gun. It is necessary to make a hole in the forehead of the terrorist without hitting the hostage. The submachine gun is not good.
              If the assault on an apartment with fighters, then PP-2000 will do.
          3. 0
            24 August 2017 04: 09
            He goes undercover, carrying a heavy tire. "LIVER" IN THE SECOND HAND Instead of PISTIC ..... But man's possibilities are not unlimited.
        2. +1
          20 March 2017 16: 21
          Quote: Comrade_Stalin
          Moreover, the gun is a melee weapon: from 5 to 25 m maximum,
          In this case, dispersion allows you to shoot at a greater distance. According to enthusiasts, the same Glock-17 with a collimator normally pulls up to 100 m. without a collimator, firing at such a distance can only be the wall of the opposite house. With a collimator, you can put more than half of the hits in a particular window.
          Quote: Comrade_Stalin
          you need to get intuitively and make 2-3 shots right away, for sure.
          Well, there’s a device that helps intuition, called the LCU. Barrel mount available. But this is 10-15 meters for full-sized goals. In a different scenario, targeted shooting is required. And here the standard rear sight with a front sight in combination with a short sighting line for a specialist can be completely unsatisfactory. A collimator is considered as an auxiliary device. As miniature and light options appeared, they began to be hooked to pistols. It’s only clear that additional training is needed, and not everyone needs it.
          Quote: Comrade_Stalin
          Come on. No one is going to an assault or a battle with a gun.

          The main weapons of the police are still pistols. In the states among enthusiasts of such weapons there are many police officers or former police officers. And other shooters are attracted by the opportunity to have a universal weapon that fits in a holster and is suitable for constant wear. Here, by the way, in one of the articles a plastic clone CZ-75 with a collimator sight and a folding shoulder rest was presented. For such enthusiasts. But the topic is being discussed and collimators on pistols have been put on their own for already 20-25 years. So there is a demand.
          1. +1
            20 March 2017 17: 10
            Quote: brn521
            The main weapons of the police are still pistols. In the states among enthusiasts of such weapons there are many police officers or former police officers. And other shooters are attracted by the opportunity to have a universal weapon that fits in a holster and is suitable for constant wear.

            I have a relative in the states who works in the sheriff’s service, who is not a fan of pistols, but who respects not big revolvers anymore. By the way, he uses it as a second chance weapon. A 45-caliber glock, full-time but rarely used in events. The main weapon is M-4. Mexican drug cartels you won’t be surprised with a gun. There are raids comparing special operations somewhere in the Middle East.
            He wants to get the PM in the Browning 9x17 cartridge, akin to Walter RRK.
            1. 0
              20 March 2017 17: 36
              Quote: marshes
              The main weapon is the M-4.

              What about patrolmen on the streets? Also with the M4?
              1. +1
                20 March 2017 17: 54
                Quote: brn521
                What about patrolmen on the streets? Also with the M4?

                Depending on the state or the district, Bereta-92, Gloki, Taisers. Mosberg, Remington or M-4. By the way, the NK-416 is already starting to use. And someone as a weighty argument carries Tommy Gan in the trunk.
                There, cops use pistols for threats, the more terrible it is for offenders, there are few "shooters." Besides "frostbitten".
                The main statistics for 22 and 25 caliber, it is easier to acquire illegally. Since 2010, laser microprinting should be located on firing guns sold in the USA.
          2. 0
            24 August 2017 04: 47
            I’m not afraid to make a mistake in assuming that you have nothing to do with shooting sport (and not one of the disciplines).
            You carry nonsense about 100 meters. A bullet will fly by much more, but with such deviations and a fall, unless you can only get into the wall of the house. The collimator shoots at DIRECT SHOT !!! For example, at 9mm (luger) a direct shot 20 meters further the bullet begins to fall. At 100 meters, it falls already at 32 centimeters. In addition, the best pistols with good shooters and good ammunition give accuracy of about 2-3 inches per 25 meters. That is, 100 meters in ideal conditions (even without wind) the spread will be about 30 centimeters. The energy of a bullet falls from 1119 joules to 950 ... I don’t remember exactly with copecks. So who are you going to shoot at 100 meters with such ballistics? How are you on a collimator, designed for a direct shot drop bullets are going to compensate? How much to lift it? Or is it a “call” to take the enemy as soon as possible to the enemy with what automatic? You will not have a chance from 100 meters in this case. What are you still raving about there ..? Ah ... you have policemen with guns ... Probably precisely because they are beaten by a "hundred" ..... Let it be known that according to statistics in North America the use of weapons occurs at a distance of less than 5 meters .... If the police (patrol) were allowed to put collimators in most cases, the police would be dead. Before you write "authoritatively" in VO, you still need to have an idea of ​​what you want to say and the topic of conversation (it is better to know it thoroughly). And so your arguments are simply ridiculous and naive. Now there is a lot of information .... read. But theory without practice .... you are in the know.
            1. 0
              24 August 2017 11: 16
              Quote: tracer
              You carry nonsense about 100 meters.

              I would have bent 200 meters, because for software this is the standard. But holding the gun is less convenient than PP, and the barrel is short.
              Quote: tracer
              At 100 meters, it falls already at 32 centimeters.

              PP users somehow cope with this, while stubbornly putting collimators on their weapons.
              Quote: tracer
              That is, for 100 meters in ideal conditions (even without wind) the spread will be about 30 centimeters

              Well, read my text again. It's not about reliably hitting a head target at this distance. The thing is that with a collimator at 100m you can fire not at the wall of the house, but a concrete window. Well, 30 cm is already some kind of sniper. On your part, not criticism, but confirmation of my words. And that's what a thing. What bothers these enthusiasts the most? Native pistol sights that pull a maximum of 50 m. So the collimators on the pistols have been, are and will be. Another thing is that these are either athletes or specialists.
              Quote: tracer
              Ah ... you have the police with guns ...

              The same answer. Stop dumbing. I’ve mentioned the police in what case. It is among them that most of all enthusiasts are squeezing maximum opportunities out of a pistol. I note that this is not necessarily about its official use. In the same way, if you leave them with only batons, separate specialists will appear, squeezing the maximum out of these batons.
              Quote: tracer
              I’m not afraid to make a mistake in assuming that you have nothing to do with shooting sport (and not one of the disciplines).

              I have enough Ltsu, combined with a flashlight. I am neither an athlete nor a specialist. I don’t even understand how poor pistol sights can allow you to shoot further than 25 meters. At this range, everything is already merging. So I understand those who intend to shoot at 100 meters and change sights for the sake of it. The front sight completely covers the target, not to mention the introduction of some amendments. At such a range, the collimator will not be enough for me. Give more reliable emphasis and sports soft descent. I don’t understand how the vocals with its specific descent manage to talk about 100 m.
              Quote: tracer
              Before you write "authoritatively" in VO

              And here we are absolutely on a par. How many publications do you have? None. Your opinion is original and differs from the generally accepted. You need to promote it, open people's eyes. People are waiting for your revelations, because even experts are mired in the darkness of ignorance. For example, a real specialist. http://karden.livejournal.com/ There's a discussion open there. Urgently explain to him how stupid it is to use a collimator on the PP, because the pistol bullet has such poor ballistics.
        3. +1
          21 March 2017 07: 55
          Come on. No one with a gun to storm or fight

          An apartment in the city, in it a type with a "squirrel" took hostage his own family. Armed with a sawn-off shotgun. Negotiations failed. Will you go with the assault rifle and shield to the assault?
      2. +2
        21 March 2017 07: 41
        Quote: brn521
        Quote: Comrade_Stalin
        Gun with collimator
        And practitioners have a reason for this. Tasks have become more difficult - you need to quickly aim and shoot accurately in motion and from uncomfortable positions.


        the tasks are the same as always - to make a hole in the enemy. nothing changed.
        the collimator sight for pistols is comparable to the sight for fly swatter. possible but not necessary.
        1. +1
          21 March 2017 11: 16
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          the collimator sight for pistols is comparable to the sight for fly swatter.

          I remember, once upon a time I came across an advertisement for a fly swatter to shoot flies without getting up off the couch. Pneumatics like. And the sight was available.
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          possible but not necessary.

          The collimators are placed on the PP. Although the working distances are actually the same. The premises, or the street across from home to home. PP of course is more convenient than pistols. But this is not a weapon of constant wear. And all sorts of laws on civilian weapons, they are substantially cut. There is no automatic mode, restrictions on the capacity of the store are possible, and even constant wearing for a company with guns and rifles is completely prohibited. So there were comrades who want to squeeze the maximum out of their gun. Up to the possibility of crushing machine gunners with fire at a distance of up to 100 meters.
    5. 0
      21 March 2017 07: 38
      Quote: Comrade_Stalin
      The gun with a collimator. Monsieur knows a lot about perversions. Still optical would add


      owls right. but I think it’s even more perverse only double action
      what the heck?
    6. 0
      16 October 2017 16: 22
      Quote: Comrade_Stalin
      The gun with belay collimator. Monsieur knows a lot about wassat perversions. Still optical would add

      Modern glocks, and not only have mounts for collimators. For shooting galleries, that’s it.
  2. 0
    20 March 2017 13: 19
    similar to GSh-18.
  3. 0
    20 March 2017 13: 24
    And what do you show us import samples? And where are ours: Swift, PL-15, Boa constrictor? A couple of years ago they promised to "surprise with new developments," and this bodyagie stretches and stretches! And the army is still armed with PMs!
    1. 0
      20 March 2017 14: 21
      Quote: senima56
      And the army is still armed with PMs!

      And what a good gun is what is needed for the Army and the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Simple and reliable.
    2. 0
      20 March 2017 14: 59
      Quote: senima56
      A couple of years ago they promised to "surprise with new developments"


      Dad promised to go to the zoo - dad went. It seems similar here.
    3. 0
      20 March 2017 17: 52
      Quote: senima56
      And what do you show us import samples? And where are our

      Well, please. http://karden.livejournal.com/42332.html
      GS-18 works with stores from PY, albeit without a shutter lag.
    4. 0
      24 August 2017 04: 50
      "Swift" shit is unique .... I can’t say about the rest, I didn’t shoot, did not hold it in my hands and even less did not repair it.
  4. +2
    20 March 2017 14: 01
    Maybe you should stop publishing such articles, otherwise you start reading the article and the "green pimply" starts to push. An article in the series we don’t live like that. Given that Glock in Europe starts the price tag with 200 euros, and with our legislation ....
    1. +2
      20 March 2017 20: 09
      Well, who's stopping you to become an athlete? The same practical shooting is very fashionable now. smile
  5. +2
    20 March 2017 15: 27
    Now look at him in action and think if he is worthy of a separate article.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUeNP51XTeg
    1. 0
      21 March 2017 07: 54
      Quote: Petrucho
      Now look at him in action and think if he is worthy of a separate article.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUeNP51XTeg


      yeah, serious flaws. Something is amiss in the Danish state.
  6. 0
    20 March 2017 17: 29
    There is Glock, everything else, its derivatives. All.
    1. 0
      24 August 2017 04: 52
      I can list a bunch of good trunks; I personally prefer Smith Weson MP.
  7. +1
    20 March 2017 19: 36
    Thus, if you insert a magazine into the gun and pull the bolt out to send the cartridge into the chamber, then for the shot it will be enough just to press the trigger.

    Doesn’t it seem strange to the author that the given algorithm is valid for all pistols? or is it again "British students have proven"?
    1. +2
      20 March 2017 20: 10
      It is understood that it is not necessary to remove from the fuse.
  8. +1
    20 March 2017 19: 52
    That is what a modern gun should be. USM of only double action makes the weapon ready for immediate use, eliminates the likelihood of a fatal mistake for a shooter in a stressful situation, and the ability to adjust the trigger force can improve firing accuracy. Such a weapon is ideal for people with little shooting skills, who may simply forget to remove the weapon from the fuse in the face of danger, when every moment is worth its weight in gold.
    1. +6
      20 March 2017 20: 14
      I would still prefer an extra fuse switch or refuse to carry a weapon with a cartridge in the chamber. I understand with my mind that I will not shoot myself, but sometimes it is better to be outrun than to get it.
      1. +1
        21 March 2017 00: 25
        A fuse is an extra element in a dual-action trigger. It is impossible to accidentally create a force of 3,5 kg * s on the trigger; the automatic fuse inside will not allow a shot to be fired without fully depressing the trigger. Revolvers have long been doing fine without a fuse, being completely safe for their owners.
      2. 0
        21 March 2017 08: 01
        Quote: AlexMark
        I would still prefer an extra fuse switch or refuse to carry a weapon with a cartridge in the chamber. I understand with my mind that I will not shoot myself, but sometimes it is better to be outrun than to get it.


        100%. pulled the shutter, the fuse opened. shoot. no problem.
        if it’s become very scary, put the cartridge in the barrel, lower the fuse and be ready.

        quite a few people shot themselves and friends for negligence.
      3. 0
        21 March 2017 11: 52
        Quote: AlexMark
        I understand with my mind that it will not fire by itself, but sometimes it’s better to overdo it than to overdo it.

        It's all Glock's fault. It got to the point that some comrades began to drag him in front of his belt, shrouded in front. With a cartridge in the barrel, of course. And without any consequences. The principle - until you hit it, shoot it - it worked perfectly. The finger rests on the trigger only upon reaching the aiming line, which is fair and sufficient for any weapon if this weapon is made correctly. And there, all sorts of other concessions went. For example, the classic instructed the driver to drag the gun to the window bypassing the steering wheel so that the trunk line did not cross the legs. It turned out to be nonsense - excessive concern for security to the detriment of combat readiness. Price is an addiction to Glock’s special descent, which is just about on the border between security and combat effectiveness. The people got used to it, and some even decided that it was an ideal. I suspect that the descent at the pistol from the article was made specifically only for self-cocking in an attempt to imitate Glock's descent, but cheaper and more technologically, without troubles with half-cocking.
    2. 0
      21 March 2017 07: 57
      Quote: mr.redpartizan
      That is what a modern gun should be. USM of only double action makes the weapon ready for immediate use, eliminates the likelihood of a fatal shooter error in a stressful situation,


      double action gives the same solution. cocked cock - shoot, cocked not cocked and cocked.
      and do not pull the weapon with a double action, with each shot.
      1. 0
        21 March 2017 12: 07
        Quote: Maki Avellievich
        cocked cock - shoot, cocked not cocked and cocked.

        But the descent handling is different. This is considered to be one of the advantages of Glock. Due to the constant half-platoon, he always has the same descent. Those. before making the first shot, no unnecessary troubles affecting the result of the shot. You do not need to remember the state of your gun and make extra body movements.
  9. 0
    21 March 2017 22: 14
    The release of the barrel with the casing-shutter is due to the skew of the breech.

    the next upgrade will probably be in the presence of a drum instead of a magazine in the handle, an attached bayonet-knife and the presence of gift wrapping
  10. 0
    26 March 2017 07: 00
    Another oral craft for making money.
    Weapons for police (patrol, district, etc.) should not have similar performance characteristics with weapons for police force units. And the requirements for army pistols in general from another book.
    And a hundred meter pistol shooting to suppress a submachine gun is generally to Hollywood.
    1. 0
      24 August 2017 04: 55
      IN BOLYWOOD !!!
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    30 August 2017 17: 18
    Quote: brn521
    I am neither an athlete nor a specialist. To me

    You see, this is what distinguishes us. With your permission, I am both the first and second, I was also the third, but the service has long been completed. I wrote my expert opinion based on more than 30 years of experience in shooting, although pistols are a derivative, I am a “rifleman”. And, by the way, my opinion is addressed to people like you. Connoisseurs of the Kalash class break through the rail. He published his articles in specialized forums not related to military review. The truth is now "lazy" .. And I rarely visit one of the most popular weapon forums in Russia. In addition, I will tell you that this is not a cheap pleasure. In order to draw the conclusions that I described about the use of the collimator, I spent a sufficient amount and several years of time. Do you think this is enough to put an expert opinion? Your choice of how to relate to this, usefully or "fill the bumps." When mom tells the child do not put your fingers in the socket, the child is aware that the mother is "dark" on this topic. Do not be like a moody baby.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"