Technodinamika will begin to develop the D-14 parachute system

Tekhnodinamika holding (part of Rostec) this year will begin development work on the creation of the D-14 “Shelest” parachute system, reports Defence.ru with reference to the CEO of the company Igor Nasenkov.

“The technical assignment for a new parachute system has been developed, development work will begin this year,” said Nasenkov.

The new parachute will be combined with the equipment “Warrior.

According to the CEO, the promising D-14 system will be ready for delivery to the troops by 2019 of the year.

Now the company is engaged in the modernization of the D-10 2 parachute. As part of the modernization, a more sophisticated suspension system is being developed with improved ergonomic indicators, which provide, inter alia, a combination with modern military equipment sets. “In addition, a cargo container is planned to be located in front of the reserve parachute, which will allow paratroopers to gain greater autonomy when carrying out combat operations. In the case of a parachutist landing, it will be used as a raft, "the material says.

The X-NUMX series D-10 system is designed for jumping from Il-2, An-76 aircraft and Mi-2 helicopters by paratroopers of all specialties with or without full service armament and equipment, as well as individual parachutists or parachutists groups. At the moment, the parachute system is being modernized, a technical assignment for a new parachute system has been developed, development work will begin this year,

told the CEO.

Comments

[Teberii]

We got a new terms of reference, the necessary solution for new equipment.

[Pancer]

Quote: Teberii

a new solution for the necessary equipment.

Yes, but it’s not happy that its readiness is only for 2019 .. why is it with such long deadlines ?? The WARRIOR is already in the army ..

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Pancer

Yes, but I’m not happy that its readiness is only for 2019 .. why with such long deadlines?

And that’s good - the “six” is working for now and will still work oh-hoo ... Although I did not look closely at what the boys are now jumping on. Bad another but this is on my personal level - time is going on !!!.... I jumped the first three jumps in DOSAAF on PD-47 ... And the “six” was my family ... And now D-14... Oh, time .... I envy today's boys - we thought we were equipped with the latest technology. More than 20 years passed in uniform with this thought. And compare with "now" - so we had, roughly speaking, only AKS, IL-76 and a wild faith in ourselves and in the landing .... Although this is already very much, it seems to me.

[Pancer]

Quote: Zoldat_A

Although this is already very much, it seems to me.

Well, you guys in blue berets, the guards of the country, do not hold your breath. Therefore, we are proud that we have winged infantry.
But the new ..., with such delays in the new equipment, is not great. Someone is clearly out of place.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Pancer

But the new ..., with such delays in the new equipment, is not great.Someone is clearly out of place.

So it has always been like this ... Someone serves the motherland, someone is bullied ... Someone is in the BV, someone is serving a term ... Unfortunately, even in the best troops (I do not want to offend ALL the rest !!!) not all eagles ... And in the context of the article the same thing - someone thinks how it is better for boys to fall on the enemy’s head, and someone wipes a suit for a half kilobax in a chair ... How are they, such Uproot ALL - a rhetorical question ... G .... always and everywhere enough ... Unfortunately ....

[Arh]

Yes, it is necessary to develop in those areas even more ....

[Pancer]

Quote: Zoldat_A

How to eradicate ALL of them is a rhetorical question ... G .... there is always and everywhere enough ... Unfortunately ....

Hmm .. there was a time in the owl Lavrenty Palych .. well, he would definitely find a way ..

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Pancer

Hmm .. there was a time in the owl Lavrenty Palych .. well, he would definitely find a way ..

If my plus sign Lavrenty Palycha had resurrected ... I wonder if Marshal Taburetkin would simply disappear instead of the UAC board of directors or would there be an indicative court for the whole country?

[Hellraiser]

Yes, they’ve already come up with a lot of things after the Six.
Here are the links if interesting D-10: http://milaremina.ru/vdv/desantnyj-parashyut-d-10
-id-10p.html
Crossbow-2 for special. Airborne units and intelligence
http://milaremina.ru/vdv/parashyut-arbalet-2.html

[Rusfaner]

1976 - D-1-8 ser. 6, then D-5, D-6, PO-9, Mallow, Crossbow ...
The "winged" infantry would have automatically controlled cargo "wings" with GLONASS / GPS, so that the guys "in the cold" could receive from afar EXACTLY ammunition, food, batteries (otherwise it was a curse to carry them ...). The eroplan threw them from a height of 10k kilometers in 20-30 and left, and the system itself taxied to the group. And if it’s also downwind, and if it’s a cargo paraglider, then you can drop it even after 50 km. And he "floats" in the night sky completely silently ...

[midivan]

Quote: Rusfaner

The "winged" infantry would have automatically controlled cargo "wings" with GLONASS / GPS

The idea is not even bad, and then they can not be calculated by the signals of these glonasov \ jeepies?

[Rusfaner]

No, because on the cargo wing there are receivers of signals from the above navigation systems. They do not emit anything on the air.
Mattresses are armed with such means of delivery. Used in Afghanistan.

[vvu-globus]

March 1, 1973, the first jump on the D-3 series 3, and the D-5 was one and with it the head of the VMS jumped.

[dubowitskij.vick]

Quote: midivan

Quote: Rusfaner

The "winged" infantry would have automatically controlled cargo "wings" with GLONASS / GPS

The idea is not even bad, and then they can not be calculated by the signals of these glonasov \ jeepies?

No, they can’t. The fact is that all these systems are passive. They do not emit, but receive satellite signals. Moreover, for the accuracy of determination, at least three at the same time.

[Grim Reaper]

Khe. The paratrooper will determine its coordinates by GPS. The backpack is mine. How do they know each other’s whereabouts? Only if the backpack gives the paratrooper their coordinates. Total - no matter how you go on air, at least from the side of the backpack, it will still be. Another question is how safe and noise immunity.

[Cat man null]

Quote: Ecilop

The paratrooper will determine its coordinates by GPS. Backpack - your

Quote: Ecilop

How do they know each other’s whereabouts?

Quote: Ecilop

Only if the backpack gives the paratrooper their coordinates

- and their paratrooper - a backpack
- then both of them will understandwhere is their ... um, soulmate

[Grim Reaper]

Well, something like this. ))))
Alternatively, a backpack can land at a pre-negotiated point. Then it is truly unbearable and almost unsupportable.
The main thing is that the paratrooper was "in the same place, at the same hour",))

[dubowitskij.vick]

Quote: Ecilop

Khe. The paratrooper will determine its coordinates by GPS. The backpack is mine. How do they know each other’s whereabouts? Only if the backpack gives the paratrooper their coordinates. Total - no matter how you go on air, at least from the side of the backpack, it will still be. Another question is how safe and noise immunity.

And why, when loading equipment into the transporter, or on the go to the drop-out point, does not lay down the coordinates of the target, where the planning system for parachute systems will lead? The scatter will be, but with active management, not significant. Or I'm wrong? Finally, can a beacon operate, but not at a radio frequency, but, for example, in the optical range, on an infrared projector?

[Letnab]

Something like that, delivery by planning parachutes, only by radio control was practiced by the Aviation Protection in the early 90s, then the topic died out, they didn’t even stutter about satellite navigation ... At present, with the current capabilities of satellite navigation and other hardware, this topic is quite possible.

[Romanenko]

I do not quite understand about the cargo raft container under the spare wheel, what do you put there and how will all this "pampering" look when the container is full? Previously, they hung on the back loop of the main girth, of course it was inconvenient to walk with him alone, someone had to help get into the ship, but when landing, everything somehow happened simply and logically, pulled a small ring, the container and hung down on its line , you’re dropping like faster, but since the container lands earlier, its weight does not apply to you when landing. But in the form of a pregnant woman it is somehow incomprehensible. We write to the incorrect description of the new location of the container.

[dubowitskij.vick]

Quote: Romanenko

I do not quite understand about the cargo raft container under the spare wheel, what do you put there and how will all this "pampering" look when the container is full? Previously, they hung on the back loop of the main girth, of course it was inconvenient to walk with him alone, someone had to help get into the ship, but when landing, everything somehow happened simply and logically, pulled a small ring, the container and hung down on its line , you’re dropping like faster, but since the container lands earlier, its weight does not apply to you when landing. But in the form of a pregnant woman it is somehow incomprehensible. We write to the incorrect description of the new location of the container.

All this from the irregularity of the human body. The knees should bend back. Then the container in front would not interfere.