Liberals opposed the military-patriotic education

Famous public figures opposed the introduction of the obligatory subject “Military-Patriotic Education” in Russian school curricula.

“Formally, such education is aimed at preparing for service in the armed forces of the country. But in fact, it directly provides for the formation of a worldview based on the cult of the state, nation and army,” Russian civil society activists said in a statement said in a statement.

The document, in particular, was signed by Lyudmila Alekseeva, head of the Moscow Helsinki Group, Andrei Sakharov’s widow Elena Bonner, head of the Andrei Sakharov Foundation Sergey Kovalev, leader of the For Human Rights movement, Lev Ponomarev, head of the Right of Child organization Boris Altshuler, writer Boris Strugatsky, co-chair Right Cause Party Leonid Gozman, Executive Secretary of the Solidarity opposition movement Mikhail Shneider.

According to their data, “military-patriotic education” of children and adolescents is provided for by the concept of the federal system of preparing citizens of the Russian Federation for military service for the period up to 2020 of the year. The concept was approved in February 2010.

"Military-patriotic education inevitably includes biased preparation and mythologization stories his country, the uncritical glorification of those wars that were fought by his own country, the cult of a strong centralized power, "the statement says.
The authors of the document remind that "military-patriotic education has always been understood and understood as a holistic ideological doctrine." “The concept of“ military-patriotic education ”goes far beyond the limits of raising love for the Motherland, a natural attachment to one's culture, to one’s native land, to one’s own country,” write public figures.

“All together, this instigates nationalism, inspires children and teenagers about the unconditional priority of the interests of state power and national feelings over other values, including universal, humanistic and truly religious,” the authors of the document say.

In their opinion, the education system should be built "on the basis of modern humanistic and democratic principles, unconditional respect for the rights and dignity of the individual, on objective and comprehensive informing students about past events and the current situation in our country and the world."

Comments

[Mi]

What not to do, everything is wrong! And so they lit a shitty, leisbian-fagot mess with marches and rallies. Fell in Pindos, b ... di submarine.

[djjn]

Well, what are the "personal convictions" of humanists, common people, liberals? Phantom, personal belief, demand?
February 1917 happened! The talk shop took over the rule ... The subordination of the army was abolished, and they called for discussions. The army has become a herd. The soldiers were "tired of fighting," and crowds of deserters flocked to the country.
In view of the same talking, the rule of law turned into a muddle. It became impossible to defend the state.
Power has become weakness.
The Bolsheviks put an end to this, having dispersed this whole talking room. And they started small: they stopped transport and upset finances. Without supplies, industry rose in a week; in the cities food ran out, soap and salt disappeared. Foci of epidemics began to emerge.
The next step was a call for expropriation ... Anyone who considered it possible - the ubiquitous homeless people, criminals, armed deserters, beggars, adventurers - all responded to the general plunder of the country and rallied around their own, dear to the heart ... The Bolsheviks relying on this lumpen could already unleash the "Red Terror".
It is no secret that the Trotsky project was implemented in Russia by the efforts of the Anglo-Saxon behind the scenes. With Lenin everything is clear, in war all means are good. But in that war, Russia was an ally of the British ...
They seemed to like this thing. But at the expense of home-grown screamers, these must be calculated and taken note. You never know what ...

[Krylovets2000 (HVVKU)]

Excuse me, but ... WHO ARE LIBERALS?
I WILL ANSWER IMMEDIATELY: JEWISH Fascists (Khabadniks and a hedgehog with them)! 5-th column in any Slavic state. They see us as pigs (see here: http://www.molvica.com/podcast/sistem/ddd.html)

that's all. Who needs strong Slavs ???

[Comrade]

Well, I saw their last names and understood everything ... I'm not surprised that they are against the patriotic education of our youth)
But in spite they need to open Dosaafa so that these deck rats run far away ... !!!

[Altergo]

There really is nothing to think about here, like our liberals, or rather liberalists, are concerned about a completely different country. You'll hear even worse things from them.

[Shuriken]

The Dulles Plan is a guide to action for these primates. Or even a handbook ...

[Chamber No. 6]

The document, in particular, was signed by Lyudmila Alekseeva, head of the Moscow Helsinki Group, Andrei Sakharov’s widow Elena Bonner, head of the Andrei Sakharov Foundation Sergey Kovalev, leader of the For Human Rights movement, Lev Ponomarev, head of the Right of Child organization Boris Altshuler, writer Boris Strugatsky, co-chair Right Cause Party Leonid Gozman, Executive Secretary of the Solidarity opposition movement Mikhail Shneider.
Stormy applause! A curtain! Sailed ...