Military Review

Intellectual shells for Russian armored vehicles will be adopted next year

33
Intellectual ammunition for the latest Russian armored vehicles, including military vehicles "Armata" and "Kurganets", will be adopted in 2018 year, reports RIA News a message from the general director of the Techmash concern Sergey Rusakov.



At the time of the Concern "Tehmash", on the basis of NPO "Pribor" JSC, preparatory work on the integration of the complex "intellectual ammunition" into the appropriate combat modules of armored combat vehicles for the purpose of conducting state tests. Arming these munitions is possible no earlier than 2018,
told Rusakov.

Earlier it was reported that the developer of the shells concern "Tehmash" began preliminary testing of "new artillery ammunition with an intelligent system of remote blasting." In particular, it was said about prospective ammunition for X-NUMX-mm AU-57 “Baikal” combat modules, which will be installed on the Armata T-220, the Boomerang, and the Kurganets-15 BMP.
Photos used:
http://bastion-karpenko.ru
33 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 20 February 2017 12: 56
    +7
    If only they would do it first, and then write ... otherwise, announce the whole list, please, for 200 years, what awaits us there ...
    1. Koshak
      Koshak 20 February 2017 13: 05
      +13
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      If only they would do it first, and then write ... otherwise, announce the whole list, please, for 200 years, what awaits us there ...

      Why grumble? Anyone like that, but I'm interested in knowing the plans and prospects for the development of weapons. If you are not interested, spit and do not read.
      1. Monos
        Monos 20 February 2017 13: 21
        +3
        "New artillery ammunition with an intelligent remote detonation system."

        How is it that they themselves determine where to explode?
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 20 February 2017 13: 33
          +4
          Remote fuse with a non-contact setting of the blasting time. I don’t know, as with the 57 mm, on the “thirty” this is done by the laser after the projectile leaves the channel of the gun barrel.

          Data from the rangefinder.

          Allows you to work effectively on some wound "complex" goals. For example, aircraft, enemy infantry behind shelters, well, etc. Not a prodigy, but increases combat capabilities.
          1. Arh
            Arh 20 February 2017 13: 47
            +1
            I like it, as soon as possible armored vehicles on the stream after GOST tests.
        2. Alikos
          Alikos 20 February 2017 21: 49
          +1
          Quote: Monos
          "New artillery ammunition with an intelligent remote detonation system."

          How is it that they themselves determine where to explode?


          Very necessary. But yesterday ...
      2. RUSIVAN
        RUSIVAN 20 February 2017 13: 40
        0
        If you are interested in knowing plans and prospects, read fiction there will be a lot of useful and interesting things for you. By the way, I spat and don’t read anymore.
      3. barclay
        barclay 20 February 2017 13: 42
        0
        Quote: Koshak
        Who cares, but I’m interested to know the plans and prospects for the development of weapons

        For us, these are only prospects. Such ammunition is needed. Unfortunately, we are only catching up with them so far.

        Although these ammunition is expensive enough for mass use, we should have it too. This is an indicator of the level of economic development.
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 20 February 2017 13: 53
          +1
          Quote: barclay
          For us, these are only prospects.

          TKN-4GA-02.
          1. barclay
            barclay 20 February 2017 14: 00
            0
            This is all not bad. But the caliber is smaller. And the ammunition itself is not yet controlled.
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 20 February 2017 14: 03
              +1
              Why should it be managed?
              Managed in such calibers do not make much sense.
              1. barclay
                barclay 20 February 2017 14: 09
                0
                Apparently for use on single targets of the appropriate size and degree of protection in certain conditions (in particular on water) it is cheaper than a guided missile.
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 20 February 2017 14: 37
                  +3
                  Quote: barclay
                  Apparently for use on single targets of the appropriate size and degree of protection in certain conditions

                  Doesn't make much sense. The power of action at the target of small-caliber ones is not so great, the control system reduces it even more. It’s easier to apply a dozen conventional ones, the probability of hitting a target will be higher.
                  1. barclay
                    barclay 20 February 2017 15: 07
                    0
                    Partly agree with you. The caliber is too small for guided ammunition.
                    But one shot is one goal, you must admit it quickly and efficiently.
                    Of course, for this there is an ATGM in the end, which is almost three times the caliber. Here for sure. good
                    1. Lopatov
                      Lopatov 20 February 2017 15: 12
                      +2
                      Quote: barclay
                      But one shot is one goal, you must admit it quickly and efficiently.

                      Not a fact.
                      Even in anti-tank systems, the probability of hitting a target is not equal to one.
                      1. barclay
                        barclay 20 February 2017 15: 31
                        0
                        Well, if we talk about probability, then of course it is not 100%. But still, the consumption of ammunition (managed and unmanaged) is not comparable.
            2. Gray brother
              Gray brother 20 February 2017 14: 03
              +1
              Quote: barclay
              But the caliber is smaller.

              With small, on the contrary, everything is more complicated.
              Adjustable ammunition is not news at all.
              1. barclay
                barclay 20 February 2017 14: 10
                0
                And I did not claim that this is news.
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 20 February 2017 12: 57
    +2
    And you say, microelectronics in Russia has disappeared. Such ammunition without smart fuses DO NOT HAPPEN. Well, not in China, they order crystals for them, that's for sure.
    1. 100502
      100502 20 February 2017 13: 08
      +1
      Believe me, disappeared.
      1. bald
        bald 20 February 2017 13: 16
        0
        You are mistaken !!! Still plowing. EXAMPLE ON FLIGHT all the Serdyukovism razderbanila - and the microassembly workshop still plows.
      2. Koshak
        Koshak 20 February 2017 13: 28
        +3
        Quote: 100502
        Believe me, disappeared.

        Who, specifically, needs to be believed? Svidomo media, or what? So they don’t build the Crimean bridge, and the “Armata” from cardboard, and the shelves in our stores are empty, hedgehogs for coupons and two-day queues, and pensioners are dying of hunger right on the streets.
  3. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 20 February 2017 12: 58
    +3
    I’m just happy from such news - what if something is wrong? The article is certainly interesting, but what if the technical overlay and the delay will be big? The article lacks the words “if”, “maybe”, “probably” - this is at the time of the creation and adoption of such shells.
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 20 February 2017 13: 16
      +1
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      on the creation and adoption of such shells.

      I don’t see any particular problems - 30 mm already have shells and a sight with a programmer.
      TKN-4GA-02 http://www.romz.ru/en/catalog/pricel-tkn-4ga-02.h
      tm
  4. Altona
    Altona 20 February 2017 13: 01
    +1
    I hope not in the amount of 10 pieces will be released.
  5. kouldoom
    kouldoom 20 February 2017 13: 05
    0
    I’m all waiting for the armature on the radio control to be done.
    1. Banishing liberoids
      Banishing liberoids 20 February 2017 13: 37
      0
      I saw it on sale, though, my dear, they say that about 25 pieces are worth it, and they are brought to order - if you buy it for sure!
      1. kouldoom
        kouldoom 20 February 2017 13: 42
        0
        Oh a little expensive
  6. mitrich
    mitrich 20 February 2017 13: 20
    0
    Hmm, the vast majority of news we have in the future tense. The implementation of which is a single digit. ETOGES, despite the Soviet developments, we have no guided shells in real combat units! And the thing is necessary. Instead of pouring hundreds of pieces of "cast iron", with an incomprehensible result, 1-2 such devices are enough and the target is hit.
  7. Shuttle
    Shuttle 20 February 2017 13: 20
    0
    Quote: 100502
    Believe me, disappeared.

    How to trust the opinion of the login index?
  8. Stinger
    Stinger 20 February 2017 14: 29
    0
    Interestingly, stuffing in dollars or in rubles? Where can I get the money for these intellectuals, Zin?
  9. Slovak
    Slovak 20 February 2017 17: 12
    0
    With this intellectual ammunition can be arranged to fly, for example, in the Rada?
  10. mavr1l
    mavr1l 21 February 2017 20: 14
    0
    Soon, the concept is expandable. From 1 year to 1000 years?