Military Review

The launch of the 20385 head corvette is scheduled for May 2017.

54
According to the Internet portal defense.ru, the press service of the shipyard "Severnaya Verf" (part of the United Shipbuilding Corporation) reported that the head corvette of the 20385 project "Gremyaschy" (laid down February 1 2012) will be launched in May this year:

Launching the corvette into the water will allow the installation of ship systems, main engines and shafting to be completed, to center them and to prepare the “Thunderman” for mooring trials.




Alexander Ulyashev, deputy chief builder of the plant, said that Russian manufacturers engaged in equipping the ship would soon complete the manufacture of equipment previously supplied from abroad.

Ранее сообщалось that the engines were manufactured as part of an import substitution program at the Kolomna Plant, which specializes in locomotive and diesel engine building based on its own scientific and technical developments.

The hull coloring is almost complete. Immediately before launching, we will install the fairing hydroacoustic station.

- explained A. Ulyashev on the progress of work.

Multipurpose corvettes of the 20385 project, developed by the Almaz Central Design Bureau, are intended for detecting and destroying enemy submarines and surface ships, for assault landing, and also for solving various tasks in the near-sea zone. Artillery, missile, anti-submarine, sonar and radar complexes are located on the ships. The project provides a hangar for the Ka-27 helicopter.

Corvette displacement is 2200 tons, cruising range is 3500 miles, autonomy is 15 days, crew is 99 people. The ship’s armament is represented by an 100-mm artillery mount. A-190-01, two 30-mm anti-aircraft guns AK-630M, universal missile system "Caliber-NK", anti-aircraft missile system"Redoubt"antisubmarine complex"Package"anti-submarine helicopter Ka-27.
54 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 17 February 2017 07: 22
    +7
    At least one good news about our fleet under construction has not been postponed, postponed to a later date, but launched!
    1. Orel
      Orel 17 February 2017 07: 24
      +8
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      At least one good news about our fleet under construction has not been postponed, postponed to a later date, but launched!


      Do not exaggerate;) The ship program is large and it is generally being implemented.
      1. Dangerous
        Dangerous 17 February 2017 07: 49
        +25
        Exiled liberoidoc - Not lowered, but planned for descent only)
        Eagle - most of the terms are broken, this applies to Project 22350, nuclear submarine Project 855 Yasen, BDK 1171.1 Ivan Gren, not to mention the reduction by half of the ships of Project 11350.
        It’s just that the news creates the feeling that everything is being carried out, such as being designed - put into production - a building is laid down - will be launched - launched - prepared for testing - will be accepted for service - accepted for service. And all this is about the same ship, although the timing is several years. It would be interesting to read that we were promised another year in 2011 under the rearmament program and what was accomplished from this
      2. Banishing liberoids
        Banishing liberoids 17 February 2017 07: 50
        +7
        Arelik there are unfinished corvettes without engines, is "good" for the fleet "overall"? am I understand that patriotism is over the top for you, but, be a progamist, the de facto program was disrupted because of the sluggishness of ministries and departments and the acute shortage of personnel, we placed advertisements in Rostov-on-Don on Don Sevmash, they need specialists in machine tools and welders, rotational work method, several of my friends went to find out what was there and how actually with salary and work.
        1. Wild_grey_wolf
          Wild_grey_wolf 17 February 2017 08: 54
          +4
          Quote: Expelling Liberoids
          Arelik there are unfinished corvettes without engines, is "good" for the fleet "overall"? am I understand that patriotism is over the top for you, but, be a progamist, the de facto program was disrupted because of the sluggishness of ministries and departments and the acute shortage of personnel, we placed advertisements in Rostov-on-Don on Don Sevmash, they need specialists in machine tools and welders, rotational work method, several of my friends went to find out what was there and how actually with salary and work.



          It’s a nightmare how to live, to punish everyone, to dismiss, to put, pensions for the elderly, the way of the people.
          You are all re-patriots, all the pill.
          Nobody knows anything, all the deadlines have passed, Only I know and understand everything. Now how do I get down to business.
          1. just exp
            just exp 17 February 2017 11: 47
            +2
            Tell me, which of the naval projects has not been disrupted?
            1. Wild_grey_wolf
              Wild_grey_wolf 17 February 2017 11: 55
              +4
              Are you suggesting that you write in all the comments about how life is bad, that no one knows how to, and the one who writes certainly knows everything, but never gets up off the couch, because who if he does not open his eyes to a life.
              Well funny After all.
              1. just exp
                just exp 17 February 2017 13: 43
                +4
                no, I suggest not lying. liars already got me. they promised armature by 2012, PAK FA by 2013, and they promise them every year, they lie about ships, about helicopters, they lie about everything. when I read that in Russia I’ll do this and that, I don’t believe them anymore, I don’t think, I know that they won’t do anything.
                and you think I'm to blame? or am I guilty of not believing liars?
                it’s their fault, and let them correct this situation and the first step to fix it is not to lie, the second step in the media is to write only WHAT THEY DID, and not exactly what the tochnik will do in their mouth. because I know what they will not do.
                but those who star in the media about what they’ll do, they really do.
                I have not seen the winning articles of the Dome that they will soon make TorM2, I do not see the winning articles about the S-500, but they are made.
                therefore less words and boasting, and more work.
                1. Wild_grey_wolf
                  Wild_grey_wolf 17 February 2017 14: 02
                  +4
                  Quote: just EXPL
                  no, I suggest not lying. liars already got me. they promised armature by 2012, PAK FA by 2013, and they promise them every year, they lie about ships, about helicopters, they lie about everything. when I read that in Russia I’ll do this and that, I don’t believe them anymore, I don’t think, I know that they won’t do anything.
                  and you think I'm to blame? or am I guilty of not believing liars?
                  it’s their fault, and let them correct this situation and the first step to fix it is not to lie, the second step in the media is to write only WHAT THEY DID, and not exactly what the tochnik will do in their mouth. because I know what they will not do.
                  but those who star in the media about what they’ll do, they really do.
                  I have not seen the winning articles of the Dome that they will soon make TorM2, I do not see the winning articles about the S-500, but they are made.
                  therefore less words and boasting, and more work.



                  Everything is bad, everyone LIES, horror everywhere, Putin, of course, is to blame for everything, around the devastation. I don’t believe anyone and I don’t advise you. Believe only me. I will tell you how to. All on the barricades.

                  Funny again.
                  1. just exp
                    just exp 17 February 2017 17: 17
                    0
                    1 i'm just a prodigy
                    2 I did not call for barricades, moreover, I will go first to smash those barricades
                    3 I got liars who lie every day giving impossible promises or otmazyvayas from frustrations of the plans of that same Putin.
                    4 but didn’t come up with the idea that a mole has gotten into the defense industry that disrupts all programs, and it seems like big work is going on, money is being spent, ships are being built, but the fleet has no new ships?
                2. Kudrevkn
                  Kudrevkn 18 February 2017 13: 44
                  0
                  Dear friend! Even Reagan (a great liar and a hoaxer, a funeral worker of the Soviet Socialist Republic) said: "Always speak the TRUTH, speak only the truth - do not tell the whole truth to the end!"? Is it "cheating" or "bluffing" when you sit down to "play" with cheaters, and you do not have "trump cards" or are they smaller than your "counterparts"? But are you forced to "pout with importance like a frog" so that your opponent does not have the temptation to "bite" (destroy) ?! Good luck, optimism and faith in people and Russia!
              2. Monarchist
                Monarchist 17 February 2017 14: 02
                +1
                And how it makes breathing easier. There is such a breed of eternal writers.
                1. Wild_grey_wolf
                  Wild_grey_wolf 17 February 2017 14: 08
                  +1
                  Quote: Monarchist
                  And how it makes breathing easier. There is such a breed of eternal writers.


                  Yes, I have no doubt that it’s not an article that’s so many knowledgeable and convicting know-it-alls.
                2. just exp
                  just exp 17 February 2017 17: 21
                  +2
                  Yes, but there is a breed which can be promised forever, like a bisvis to kaklam.
                  You can scratch them every year that next year we will accept the armature, Pak FA will go into production, ships will be introduced by squadrons.
                  and record it all on tape and every year just turn on the cassette, and the suckers are happy, they again promised a bunch of nishtyaks. and from these promises the army will be renewed, and the equipment itself will be built.
                  already a thousand times wrote that let them unsubscribe what they DID, and not what they type do.
                  When they give you a salary, and for 10 months they promise that they will definitely pay next month, will you believe such a leader strongly?
        2. rov81
          rov81 17 February 2017 18: 25
          0
          Again, Sevmash is stirring something up, there are plenty of personnel here and in Severodvinsk, it is unclear why to gather people all over the country ?! Although depending on what salary they promise, maybe they want to attract people for less money (
      3. Burbon
        Burbon 17 February 2017 09: 53
        +2
        Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
        about our fleet under construction, not delayed, postponed to a later date, and launched!

        read carefully laughing WILL be lowered bully
    2. Rokossovsky
      Rokossovsky 17 February 2017 08: 42
      +17
      Quote: Expelling Liberoids
      At least one good news about our fleet under construction has not been postponed, postponed to a later date, but launched!

      You don’t mind that the corvette in / and 2200 tons was laid in the 2012 year, and it was launched in the 2017 year, five (!!!) years later! They don’t even give the fleet, but float!!!
      What you rejoice is a mystery to me! request
      1. lis-ik
        lis-ik 17 February 2017 11: 10
        +6
        Construction of the building only 5 years!
  2. jovanni
    jovanni 17 February 2017 07: 56
    +1
    Beautiful model in the picture! Now I would bring the ships to the Fleet, otherwise the Indians must have already laid eyes on them ...
    1. Monarchist
      Monarchist 17 February 2017 14: 06
      0
      As far as I know: Talavs are attractive to Indians, that is 11350
  3. Shadow shooter
    Shadow shooter 17 February 2017 08: 09
    +1
    What engines are placed on these corvettes?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. evge-malyshev
      evge-malyshev 17 February 2017 14: 00
      0
      Quote: Shadow Shooter
      What engines are placed on these corvettes?

      Can you read? Kolomenskie !!!
    3. Monarchist
      Monarchist 17 February 2017 14: 17
      0
      Kamrad, read carefully: "engines are made as part of import substitution at the Kolomenskoye plant ..... based on our own scientific and technical developments"
  4. Old26
    Old26 17 February 2017 08: 50
    +14
    Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
    Sevmash placed an advertisement, they needed specialists in machine tools and welders, shift work, several of my friends went to find out what was there and how, in fact, with salary and work.

    Learned?
    I have a friend in Leningrad, for a year, according to him, he drove past the shipyard. Welders were required (you yourself understand what qualifications). So this was the year in 2012 salaries offered 60-70 thousand. And the announcement hung from a year. Is this talking about something?
    And I agree with you. The news is presented in such a way that everything seems to be fine. Well there are small, tiny delays. Read the comments on such news: "good news", "the news pleased." And as a result. How many more years will Gorshkov finish? During this time, it was possible not only to “match” the radar with the air defense system, but also to make either a new radar or a new air defense system. As a result, for how many years has the commissioning term been disrupted?
    And so in all respects. Whether it is aviation (victorious reports that the T-50) will be in service in the amount of XX pieces in 2016), astronautics - from Vostochny, manned flights will be in 2016 (2018, 2020). The new spaceship will take off in a manned version in 2018 (now already in 2023), the Sarmat is just about to, no later than in ... will be tested .... Well, etc.
    And the worst thing is that with punitive measures (as it is suggested here at VO to shoot or plant sometimes) nothing is achieved. First of all, the training system for industry was destroyed. Management (“effective”) does not bear any responsibility for decisions made. And these Augean stables for a month or a year can not be cleared. Alas .... Sorry for the messy post. But frankly it hurts to hear all this ...
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 17 February 2017 09: 37
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      Sorry for the messy post. But frankly it hurts to hear all this ...

      Greetings! hi I’ve said it all here many times, Vladimir ... The biggest gag we have with military shipbuilding. And what’s interesting, we build icebreakers quickly with a good displacement with YaSU, but we build corvettes and frigates in time like aircraft carriers. In the construction of submarines the same mess and mess. They report about the bookmark, and then they process it with a file for 10 years ...
      Except as a mess and outright sabotage, this can not be called.
      1. Dart2027
        Dart2027 17 February 2017 17: 31
        0
        Quote: NEXUS
        And what’s interesting, we build icebreakers quickly with a good displacement from the YaSU, but we build the corvettes and frigates in time as aircraft carriers

        Because icebreakers do not need counterparty equipment in the form of guns, air defense systems, etc. The problem here is not shipbuilders.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 17 February 2017 19: 00
          +1
          Quote: Dart2027
          The problem here is not shipbuilders.

          And I didn’t always talk about shipbuilders, but about the developers of weapons, power plants, and so on ... in general, allies and financiers.
          Or, for example, yesterday it only became clear that we could not see Ukrainian gas turbines?
  5. Genals
    Genals 17 February 2017 09: 24
    0
    What kind of name? Type rattles like a bucket of bolts?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 17 February 2017 09: 40
      +4
      What is the name?

      If they knew the history of the Navy, they would not ask. There were already ships with that name
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B5%
      D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%B9_(%D1%8D%D1%81%D0%BC
      %D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%86,_1937)
    2. Sashka
      Sashka 17 February 2017 12: 29
      +3
      It seems that you are either very young or completely off topic. In the late 30s, such a destroyer appeared in the USSR. There is such a tradition, passing the name "from generation to generation." And not only your bucket can rattle, but also guns! It is a respectable name!
      Good day!
    3. The Little Humpbacked Horse
      The Little Humpbacked Horse 17 February 2017 17: 10
      +2
      Quote: GenAlS
      What kind of name? Type rattles like a bucket of bolts?


      I agree, it must be replaced by ...

  6. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 17 February 2017 09: 36
    +1
    A drop in the ocean - in the literal sense of the word, of course we can’t wait for a series of these ships ..... in the Russian Federation even a corvette is now happy, as if at least a missile cruiser was launched into the water ...
    1. INTA_VEGA
      INTA_VEGA 17 February 2017 14: 43
      +1
      In a situation where the political and military leaders (including the naval ones) are well aware that it’s pointless to deal with amers in the ocean at this stage, spending a lot of money on the ocean fleet is stupid. So we are glad that at least something new.
      Our resources are quite limited, so that at the same time new generation tanks, the ocean fleet, and the Strategic Missile Forces, and fly into space. So the government chooses the most appropriate and necessary now, which will bring the greatest benefit to the country.
      The structure of naval construction says that the main thing for us now is:
      have a couple of walking units "to demonstrate the flag" and the persecution of all sorts of women;
      the ability to protect the coast (all kinds of coastal "Bastions", "Balls", "Land Onyx", etc.);
      wear a component of the strategic nuclear forces.
  7. base66
    base66 17 February 2017 09: 48
    +1
    but it’s interesting whether it is possible to install not eight calibers, for example twelve or sixteen, and even American destroyers have up to 56 tamahawks, I understand that it’s three times as large, but you won’t get crushed by the amount
  8. starshina78
    starshina78 17 February 2017 10: 07
    0
    More and more! This is our shipbuilder’s motto.
  9. Old26
    Old26 17 February 2017 10: 17
    +5
    Quote: starshina78
    More and more! This is our shipbuilder’s motto.

    The motto should be "Quality and on time." And more and more often - this is Wishlist
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Sergey S.
        Sergey S. 18 February 2017 15: 12
        0
        Quote: rudolff
        rudolff Today, 11:19 ↑
        There, even if on time, on Kolomna diesels all the same will not go far. In the Baltic, further afraid of the Swedish pouring zone is afraid to let out.

        Until the series is built - at least 3 dozen ships, new diesel engines will not finish.
        In Soviet times, the D42 diesel engine began to be installed on boats sometime in 1959, the boats were put into operation 20-30 a year, each with 2-3 diesel engines ... The motor received a quality mark, from memory, in 1967. And this is in the presence of Kolomzavod repair bases in the fleets.
        I don’t understand how to develop and develop a new generation diesel engine for Kolomna people.

        However, such an impression is that money is crashed ....
        But only if shipbuilders get something, then the designers of Kolomna got budget money clearly less than what is required for fine-tuning.
        And the number of diesel engines ordered by the fleet clearly cannot pay for the future.
  10. OlegYOla
    OlegYOla 17 February 2017 11: 18
    0
    Replacement rocket boats and a series of probably 50 pieces to 30mu-sarcasm repeat
  11. Nehist
    Nehist 17 February 2017 12: 55
    +1
    On the one hand, it’s good, but on the other .... Even if 50 units are transferred to the fleet tomorrow, the fleet will not know what to do with them. All coastal infrastructure is destroyed, there are no places for normal basing and those services. So it’s not yet known that the presence or absence of mass construction of ships is better
    1. INTA_VEGA
      INTA_VEGA 17 February 2017 14: 48
      0
      The most important thing is that the fleet will not know “why the hell” for him 50 ships, if all of their tasks: to release strategists into the sea, scare the Barmaleys with a couple of CDs, and show up in the Amer’s media and indicate the presence.
      They invest in the infrastructure exactly as much as the number of combat units planned.
      1. Nehist
        Nehist 17 February 2017 15: 13
        0
        If!!! The whole history of the Russian fleet proves just the opposite!
  12. JD1979
    JD1979 17 February 2017 13: 00
    0
    Yeah ... no matter how many "latest" I see in the pictures, in the class of frigate corvettes, warships, those are more convinced that the design bureau that designed them previously was engaged in condom development. Both that and that disposable products. Until the first battle. Useless troughs that are dangerous to release outside the base.
    1. Dangerous
      Dangerous 17 February 2017 15: 14
      +1
      In the sense? What will happen after the first fight?
      1. JD1979
        JD1979 20 February 2017 17: 09
        0
        another attraction for divers and a mass grave for sailors
  13. Samarin
    Samarin 17 February 2017 13: 02
    +1
    Quote: Rokossovsky
    What you rejoice is a mystery to me!

    These are the enemies. They rejoice at how long the ships are being built.
    1. INTA_VEGA
      INTA_VEGA 17 February 2017 14: 53
      0
      Enemies, on the contrary, are sad, they themselves will not justify the budgets for the fleet if the Russian threat disappears smile
      Although in reality - in most cases they’re “on the drum”, in the “big geopolitics” the real functions of our fleet are to hold a couple of tankers and bulk carriers to the shores of another ally.
  14. VladimS
    VladimS 17 February 2017 13: 35
    +2
    Quote: just EXPL
    Tell me, which of the naval projects has not been disrupted?

    It is necessary to understand the root causes of the "failure", and not indiscriminately ...
    And what is the deadline and why was this and not that, but THIS - was originally? And now what? Extra month, half a year, everything is gone * ?! They tear it off ... !!! But did you take into account all the nuances from the very beginning when assigning dates - dates? Hardly!
    It was smooth on paper .. - but forgot about the ravines!
    The technique is getting complicated .... hundreds of enterprises are working on the final product!
    And what, everyone could - all on time ??
    And scold and reprove .. it's forever, please! You don’t even have to ask anyone. There are many who wish ..! Eh !!!
  15. Old26
    Old26 17 February 2017 13: 35
    +2
    Quote: rudolff
    There, even if on time, on Kolomna diesels all the same will not go far. In the Baltic, further afraid of the Swedish pouring zone is afraid to let out.

    Rudolph, of course, the engines should be on par.

    Quote: JD1979
    Yeah ... no matter how many "latest" I see in the pictures, in the class of frigate corvettes, warships, those are more convinced that the design bureau that designed them previously was engaged in condom development. Both that and that disposable products. Until the first battle. Useless troughs that are dangerous to release outside the base.


    Do others have reusable ones?
  16. Bronevick
    Bronevick 17 February 2017 17: 44
    0
    In the United States for such a period, aircraft carriers are building. What kind of import substitution are we talking about? At 20380 Kolomna diesel engines are.
  17. Old26
    Old26 17 February 2017 18: 20
    +1
    Quote: Sashka
    It seems that you are either very young or completely off topic. In the late 30s, such a destroyer appeared in the USSR. There is such a tradition, passing the name "from generation to generation."

    The fact that the comrade is not in the subject is unambiguous. But the history of ships with the name "Thundering" in our fleet did not begin in the 30s. In the history of the fleet, there were 8 ships with this name.

    Quote: VladimS
    And what is the deadline and why was this and not that, but THIS - was originally? And now what? Extra month, half a year, everything is gone * ?! They tear it off ... !!!

    All is not lost. But the state is nevertheless building its plans on the basis of something. And if a ship is put into operation six months to a year later than scheduled, it means only that further plans are "flying"
  18. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 17 February 2017 18: 20
    0
    Quote: Old26
    And the worst thing is that with punitive measures (as it is suggested here at VO to shoot or plant sometimes) nothing is achieved. First of all, the training system for industry was destroyed. Management (“effective”) does not bear any responsibility for decisions made. And these Augean stables for a month or a year can not be cleared. Alas .... Sorry for the messy post. But frankly it hurts to hear all this ...

    And the worst thing is that today all sorts of Gozmans in the media and television claim that in the 90s they benefited the people of Russia with the restoration of the worst kind of capitalism - oligarchic, while they dare to claim that they are the bearers of truth in the last resort, and the people ... .. that does not understand anything and therefore protests against the denigration of Stalin. And the fact that without any war for some 5-7 years in Russia the population decreased by several million is not an argument for them at all, like they are to blame! Today we are reaping the fruits of the politics of the 90s, hence all these unfinished projects and boasting with the promises of all officials, both civilian and military. And the deed is done with a gulkin nose! hi
  19. kefan
    kefan 17 February 2017 19: 48
    0
    Yes, I agree, the deadline for the construction of the corvette is certainly depressing, it remains to be hoped that in 2018 it will at least be transferred to the fleet.
  20. VladimS
    VladimS 17 February 2017 20: 39
    0
    Quote: Old26
    And if a ship is put into operation six months to a year later than scheduled, it means only that further plans are "flying"

    Where are they going, your plans?
    Are they building all the ships in one enterprise / plant? And how does this interfere with plans?
    And others may also not have time .. housing for example for new crews, on time to build / update, etc. etc.