Military Review

Fukushima as a special operation

36
Three non-nuclear principles prohibit Japan from owning, producing or importing nuclear weapons into its territory. However, the ruling circles are trying with all their might to circumvent the ninth article of the country's Constitution.


Formally, Japan does not possess nuclear weapons. However, the facts that can not be hidden at the present level of space and geophysical monitoring, say the opposite.

Chinese media have put forward their version of the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in March 2011. With reference to anonymous sources, it is claimed that the earthquake was caused by a failed nuclear test. The accident at the Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant was staged to hide the true causes of the spread of radiation. The hint by the governor of Tokyo Shintaro Ishihara about the possibility of using nuclear weapons against China also speaks in favor of this version. Soon after these words in the Pacific Ocean off the northeast coast of the main island of Honshu was recorded an earthquake magnitude 7,4. In addition, news agencies have distributed photographs from outer space of a huge whirlpool capable of carrying even powerful ships into the abyss. This funnel was formed in the ocean after an earthquake, but no one could explain the reasons for its occurrence.

The failure of the power supply system at Fukushima-1 NPP looks suspicious. The only rational explanation is that the Japanese deliberately allowed a leak of radiation in order to divert attention from the unsuccessful test of 9 in March of 2011.

The crew of the US Navy aircraft carrier "Ronald Reagan", traveling to sea exercises jointly with South Korea and located in the ocean not less than fifty miles east of the emergency nuclear power plant, received a monthly dose of radiation, while on land people were evacuated within only a radius 20 kilometers from the source of danger. Everything falls into place if it is assumed that the source of the main nuclear radiation was in the sea much east of Fukushima 1.

And finally, all experts are alarmed by the fact: the Japanese side is still not reporting what is really happening at the nuclear power plant. Neither the public nor the representatives of international organizations - the IAEA and the World Nuclear Association - are aware of it.

9 September The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries provided very interesting data for 2015 a year. It follows from them that radioactive elements were found in 17 of Japanese prefectures in 0,1 of a percentage of staple foods. In 2013-m, that is, two years after the accident at the nuclear power plant, according to the results of a routine survey conducted in Fukushima Prefecture, it was stated that the consequences are still very tangible. Fishermen from the city of Iwaki to this day do not conduct fishing, as radiation leaks into the ocean, as the authorities say, continue.

Taking into account the fact that all protective measures were taken at the station, and this is an indisputable fact, we can assume: the source of radiation is still in the ocean.

Let us pay attention to the January statements by the Japanese authorities that the country does not intend to support in the UN General Assembly the resolution on the start of negotiations on the global ban on nuclear weapons in 2017. With all this in mind, it is possible to assume with a high degree of confidence that Tokyo has nuclear weapons, although with all its strength it hides it from the world community.

Recall that Japan is the country of the most advanced dual-use nuclear technologies. At the Tokai plant, the Japanese created an installation to test equipment for processing fuel and reproduced material (Recycle Equipment Test Facility - RETF) from two light-water Mondzue and Dsee reactors, which use plain water as a coolant to slow down neutrons and (or). According to experts, plutonium accumulated at RETF is cleaner than weapons grade. It contains more than 96 percent Pu-239. Accumulated for 10 years of radioactive metal is enough, according to various estimates, to create 70 nuclear charges of various capacities.

Fukushima as a special operation

It is likely that Japan now has the largest reserves of plutonium. Experts from the US Department of Energy are confident that it can be used to manufacture nuclear weapons, so its civilian use is risky.

Recently, the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, Ichiro Osawa, said that the country could produce "thousands of nuclear warheads." And former Secretary General of the Cabinet Yasuo Fukuda continued: “Bans in the constitution do not mean that Japan cannot have nuclear weapons.” According to him, more than fifty reactors are dual-use objects: they now work for the civilian needs of the country, but if necessary, Tokyo can easily rebuild them in a military way. Japan had about 2016 tons of plutonium on the 100 year. And nobody stops its production.

Japan's non-nuclear status is a fiction. The country, allegedly adhering to the three non-nuclear principles, deceives the world community and even the United States, whose deadly arsenals are concentrated on the islands of the Ryukyu archipelago for almost all post-war years.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/35213
36 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. the most important
    the most important 19 February 2017 15: 50
    +9
    Well, if North Korea was able to, then Japan can even more so create a nuclear bomb .... China will be delighted !!!
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 19 February 2017 16: 46
      +17
      Quote: the most important
      Japan and even more so can create a nuclear bomb

      This is so, because it is included by analysts in 10 countries, which can create national nuclear weapons within a year. Another thing is whether they will take such a step, knowing that the islands will be washed into the ocean if the dismantling of the "third level" begins!
      Yes, and with the media they seem to be all right
      Since 1970, Japan has been launching scientific and applied satellites, has developed light and medium launch vehicles, its own ISS module, and an automatic cargo spacecraft for it.
      So, "in this post is a lot of material for serious thought" bully
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 19 February 2017 17: 04
        +6
        I always asked myself the question: why the Japanese do not increase the area of ​​their islands like the Chinese, who are building all kinds of alluviums? CAN long and secretly dream to expand at the expense of the mainland?
        1. fyvaprold
          fyvaprold 19 February 2017 18: 59
          +9
          So it is the Japanese who began to create artificial islands. China and others only follow them. With respect.
  2. ZNGRU
    ZNGRU 19 February 2017 15: 56
    +5
    So I look at all this news and think - is it really heading for the Third World War? ...
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 20 February 2017 12: 29
      +1
      will there be a difference, if you call the "Fourth"?
      1. ZNGRU
        ZNGRU 20 February 2017 12: 51
        +1
        But there is no difference.
    2. bastard
      bastard 20 February 2017 18: 57
      +2
      Quote: ZNGRU
      So I look at all this news and think - is it really heading for the Third World War? ...

      Everything is much worse and more prosaic, my friend. I have repeatedly laid out links and videos on this topic and not only. Maybe at least you will be able to study the material, otherwise the majority only chase the rating. Do not be lazy, get a lot of pleasure. The rollers are ancient. There, not only about Fukushima, the scientist says, he also communicated with Kurchatov and built the USSR nuclear missile shield. Please love and respect.
      About nuclear technology:
      https://youtu.be/ZubMsUnwCY0

      about Fukushima specifically:
      https://youtu.be/36bFc8zd25I

      This is a very interesting, also nuclear topic:
      https://youtu.be/PTkUVHZ5_Ug

      It will be interesting to throw more “marmalade”. hi

      1. ZNGRU
        ZNGRU 20 February 2017 19: 01
        +1
        Thank you - I’ll thoroughly familiarize myself with the info. good
  3. thinker
    thinker 19 February 2017 16: 40
    +5
    Recently Liberal Democratic Party leader Itiro Osawa said the country could produce “thousands of nuclear warheads.” And the former secretary general of the Cabinet, Yasuo Fukuda, continued: “Prohibitions in the constitution do not mean that Japan cannot have nuclear weapons”

    These statements are made. in 2002 yearthat even more leads to bad thoughts. And to this add that Japan back in 1970 launched the AES, the fourth in the world.
    http://www.prezidentpress.ru/news/prezident/1510-
    est-li-u-yaponiiyadernaya-bomba.html
  4. Darth Revan
    Darth Revan 19 February 2017 16: 49
    +6
    They don’t understand that in which case the Japanese islands simply go under water? fool
  5. demiurg
    demiurg 19 February 2017 17: 08
    +5
    Conspiracy Theory, REN-TV lol
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 19 February 2017 17: 40
      +6
      Quote: demiurg
      Conspiracy Theory, REN-TV

      Do not be so categorical! The version of failed nuclear weapons tests was studied literally on the next day after the Fukushima accident.
  6. Niccola Mack
    Niccola Mack 19 February 2017 18: 41
    +6
    The accident at the Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant was staged to hide the true causes of the spread of radiation.

    That's what the child would not amuse, if only he would not cry. A nuclear bomb would definitely give radiation and no one would test so close to Japan.
    Conspiracy therapists are bad - the main mistake in the Fukushima accident is the failure of the backup diesel engines and the explosion of hydrogen in the reactor cover. The second - the miscalculation of the liquidators, the first has no reasonable explanation at all - it is not clear how they were designed. In World War I (and now too), diesel generators were put on all types of ships and without problems withstood not only any pitching, but also close explosions, while remaining operational.
    All this happened before the eyes of a large number of people - maybe in order to "hide the explosion" it was necessary to "bang" one reactor and generally leave half the territory of Japan inhabited?
    And the former secretary general of the Cabinet, Yasuo Fukuda, continued: "Prohibitions in the constitution do not mean that Japan cannot have nuclear weapons."

    This is unrealistic - Americans do not need it on either side. The only area where the United States and the USSR were unanimous and supported each other's positions was the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
    And you can talk about anything.
    1. alex-cn
      alex-cn 20 February 2017 07: 44
      +4
      This is unrealistic - Americans do not need it on either side. The only area where the United States and the USSR were unanimous and supported each other's positions was the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
      How did this prevent India, Israel, and Pakistan?
      1. Niccola Mack
        Niccola Mack 20 February 2017 08: 13
        +2
        Israel is encrypted, while the Yusovites did not hold India and Pakistan after WWII for one place - as did China.
    2. 72jora72
      72jora72 20 February 2017 10: 06
      +1
      standby diesel engine failure
      Sorry, but the diesel engine worked properly, the fuel supply ran out (since the "surplus" fuel reserves are considered dead money), an operational fuel supply was planned ....... but it did not grow together.
      1. Niccola Mack
        Niccola Mack 20 February 2017 10: 26
        0
        out of fuel

        Website atominfo.ru:
        The emergency diesel generators were switched on normally, and with their help, the necessary coolant level in the primary circuit was maintained. However, about an hour after the shutdown, for unexplained (or as yet unclear) reasons, the generators turned off.

        Yesterday's reports of the failure of standby diesel generators due to a tsunami strike are also subject to verification. On the one hand, the generators at the station are really low. On the other hand, it is most likely that the problems were not with the generators, but with the electrical part (short circuits, etc.), and that their sources were not the tsunami wave, but the water available at the station.

        But I especially like this:
        The second - the accident, apparently, design, and not beyond design.


        Can someone else throw versions? - maybe all the staff went to dinner!
        1. xtur
          xtur 20 February 2017 13: 34
          0
          > Second, the accident seems to be a design one, not a beyond design basis.

          during beyond design basis accidents, nuclear fuel is not destroyed - the whole point of all design systems is precisely in preventing this event
  7. Old26
    Old26 19 February 2017 20: 31
    +3
    Quote: thinker
    These statements were made in 2002, which is even more suggestive of bad thoughts. And to this add that Japan back in 1970 launched the AES, the fourth in the world.

    Yes, how much you can pay attention to what some deputies say.
    Nobody argues, high-tech industry, advanced developments. But they forget only one thing. It is now impossible to test a nuclear charge so that countries such as the United States or Russia do not notice this.
    As for the launch. So two months later the satellite launched China. That's just the Japanese rocket could put into orbit 26 kg (satellite weighed 24 kg), the Chinese weighed 173 kg with a maximum for the carrier 930 kg. The Japanese worked for 15 hours ....
  8. Medium
    Medium 19 February 2017 20: 48
    +4
    If only VO published this nonsense, I would not be surprised. But this article was published by the Military Industrial Courier.
    Now we open the website of "Komsomolskaya Pravda" for April 11 already in 2011. And we find there an article by Svetlana Kuzina, “An earthquake in Japan is the result of an unsuccessful nuclear underground test!”
    A brief quote from it.
    “The earthquake in Japan was caused by an unsuccessful secret underground nuclear test by the Japanese, and the accident at the Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant was staged in order to hide the true causes of the spread of radiation caused by a nuclear explosion at a remote test site deep beneath the ocean floor,” he said. for example, blog.fontanka.ru, citing "many Chinese sites," whose authors, in turn, point to unnamed experts. What formed the basis for such claims? "
    I send everyone who wants to verify the identity of the text to the link http://www.kp.ru/daily/25666.5/828409/.
    Only there it is considered as stupidity, and with us - as news ... six years.
  9. albert
    albert 19 February 2017 21: 10
    +1
    I heard that ours found traces of thorium in air samples near Fukushima, but it is not used in nuclear power plants, but is needed just for the production of nuclear weapons.
  10. sentaniel
    sentaniel 20 February 2017 05: 11
    +1
    Only it was not a nuclear test. And the attack with the use of a nuclear warhead laid in the mine rig of a marine rig, which caused an earthquake. And on Fukushima, they did indeed leak specially to hide the traces of radiation in the water from a nuclear explosion.

    PS There is a version that the warhead was stolen from the "Kursk"
  11. Wolka
    Wolka 20 February 2017 06: 26
    +1
    but the tsunami was caused precisely by an underground nuclear explosion made by Japan at a secret nuclear test site in the ocean, which secretly conducted nuclear material tests creating its own nuclear bomb, but something went wrong and the nuclear explosion did its job, and Fukushima is not the cause, but the consequence in this episode, now it’s also a disguise, and the Yankees and Chinese are very well aware of this, but the Yankees still can’t hold on to the region, the imperial ambitions of the Chinese are too great, the Japanese are impotent in this respect, they want, but they can’t, because the Yankees suffer at home ...
  12. Damir
    Damir 20 February 2017 06: 52
    +1
    Neither the country's public, nor representatives of international organizations - the IAEA and the World Nuclear Association - are aware of

    and also the behavior of international environmental offices is extremely interesting ... where are all sorts of "Rainbow Warriors", GREENPIES, WHITE, etc ?????? it is not visible, not heard, no rallies, no strikes .... and if all of a sudden we have something happening now, even on a smaller scale, the stench will be for the whole europress ....
  13. Mwg
    Mwg 20 February 2017 08: 35
    +2
    "At the Tokai plant, the Japanese created a facility for testing fuel processing equipment and reproduced material (Recycle Equipment Test Facility - RETF) from two light-water reactors Mondzyu and Jey, in which ordinary water is used to slow down neutrons and (or) as a coolant." - technology is clearly dual-use, do not go to the grandmother .....
  14. Rostislav
    Rostislav 20 February 2017 10: 06
    +3
    The Chinese media put forward their version of the Fukushima disaster in March 2011. With reference to anonymous sources, it is alleged that the earthquake was caused by an unsuccessful nuclear test.

    Nonsense. Seismologists elementary calculate where the earthquake, and where the blasting of YAB. Such a statement is nothing more than a "stuffing", designed for the near average man in the street.
  15. Vladimir73
    Vladimir73 20 February 2017 12: 01
    +1
    But I’m wondering, maybe someone noticed that after the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, the Japanese militaristic rhetoric about the military seizure of the “Northern Territories” practically ceased ... or simply stopped paying attention to such opuses in our press ?!
  16. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 20 February 2017 12: 27
    +10
    The focus on mozhet being that .... - as the Japanese would say in Russian.
    .. somewhere I read that it was after the accident in the sea water that there were traces of a radioactive element used in nuclear weapons. I will not balabolit what exactly, but I read the article for sure. So, apparently, narrow-film did something ...
  17. xtur
    xtur 20 February 2017 13: 31
    +1
    Quote: Nikkola Mac
    The main mistake in the Fukushima accident is the failure of standby diesel engines and the explosion of hydrogen in the reactor lid. The second - the miscalculation of the liquidators, the first has no reasonable explanation at all - it is not clear how they were designed


    The alleged mistake in the design of diesel engines could be due to the fact that everyone understood that in the event of an earthquake that would require diesel engines, the reactor would be damaged, because the error in installing diesel engines was supposedly used as a lightning rod, so as not to focus on an unsafe reactor.

    In any case, NPP personnel had more than enough time to buy, supply, assemble and connect a new portion of diesel engines to the NPP system. Another explanation for the lack of attempts to do all this is given in the article.

    Fukushima in any case, the accident provokes confidence that the Japanese are hiding the real reasons for what happened. But what they hide is already a matter of discussion
  18. Alex_59
    Alex_59 20 February 2017 13: 52
    +3
    Authors of the article need to take a physics course at the university again. Environmental pollution from nuclear munitions and from the destruction of nuclear power plants cannot be confused. Modern nuclear ammunition is so clean that after its detonation, just a month later, you can freely be in the epicenter without protection and not get an overdose. This already in the 60-ies was not something unique, but now even more so.
    But the destruction at the nuclear power plant is much dirtier. All this is due to the fact that almost all nuclear material is burned in the munition - there is simply no substance that can cause a long and high infection of the area. But the nuclear explosion is not nuclear (That Chernobyl, Fukushima, that Mayak - there was no NUCLEAR explosion everywhere!) But a thermal chemical, which simply destroys the reactor zone and scatters pieces of the active zone on the ground with a shock wave. And these pieces of the core are the very substance with high radiation. It cannot smell nuclear, in principle - the enrichment level is too low. But it’s shining - mother do not grieve.
    Therefore, the Japanese, if they had already made nuclear weapons ammunition and tested it unsuccessfully, would hardly have wanted to arrange such a complicated cover operation. It was easier to cover everything - to simulate the leakage of radioactive waste locally in the area of ​​weapons testing from some tanker, then quickly deactivate it and silence - after a month or two there will be no explosion products. However, we see that the level of infection is really huge - no modern nuclear warhead can create such an infection in the most sad circumstances. Especially for such a long time. And in general, there is nothing to conduct full-scale tests of nuclear weapons today (none of the "normal countries" do this). Everything today is modeled on computers.
    1. Crimean partisan 1974
      Crimean partisan 1974 21 February 2017 11: 13
      0
      the bull's eye!!!!!! everyone is trying to make a sensation on the banal sloppiness and irresponsibility,
      1. The irresponsibility in Fukushima is the installation of backup diesel generators for emergency pumping of water in the reactor circuits in the basement, they were flooded immediately, therefore they could not be used, as a result, hydrogen became the reason for the failure of all 4 reactors
      2. sloppiness - instead of sending the nth number of firefighters to pump water from the basement while simultaneously supplying third-party electricity to the primary pump water pumps of the reactors, they decided to pour water from above with the help of 50 volunteers, finally nonsense, in short there was a complete mess , and this despite the fact that experts from the former USSR themselves asked for liquidation at Fokusima, but there was a total refusal of help, now radioactive ... has been pouring into the ocean for 6 years
  19. Pilat2009
    Pilat2009 20 February 2017 22: 28
    0
    Quote: Old26
    The Japanese worked for 15 hours ....

    By the way, not so long ago, the launch of an ultralight carrier ended in failure:
    The launch of the world's smallest class SS-520 launch vehicle from the Utinoura Cosmodrome (southern Kagoshima Prefecture) was unsuccessful. Its experts analyzed additional telemetry data and concluded that fuel ignition did not occur in the second stage of the rocket. For some time she continued to fly by inertia, but then fell into the Sea of ​​Japan. The length of the rocket is 9,54 meters, its diameter is 52 centimeters, and its weight is 2,6 tons. Japanese experts managed to minimize the cost of developing a rocket and launching it through the use of commonly available batteries and other components. Total expenses do not exceed 400 million yen ($ 3,6 million)
  20. Pilat2009
    Pilat2009 20 February 2017 22: 30
    0
    Quote: Alex_59
    And in general, there is nothing to conduct full-scale tests of nuclear weapons today (none of the "normal countries" do this). Everything today is modeled on computers.

    However, the first charge is always experienced to be sure for sure
    1. Alex_59
      Alex_59 21 February 2017 11: 24
      0
      Quote: Pilat2009
      However, the first charge is always experienced to be sure for sure

      Even if it is unsuccessful to detonate the test ammunition, such pollution as in Fukushima will not work. If the level of pollution at the time of the explosion is taken to be 100%, then in an hour it will drop to 45%, and in a day to 1%. Fukushima, however, has been phonite for several years with almost the same level. Not a single military explosion will give such an infection, it is simply impossible.
  21. Stanislav73
    Stanislav73 21 February 2017 09: 19
    0
    Americans seem to have moved their nuclear production to Japan.