National Interest: British destroyer is unlikely to frighten Moscow

70
For the first time since the Cold War, the British sent a warship to the Black Sea. The purpose of this step is to send a signal to Russia: “do not invade Ukraine”. But should Moscow take this signal seriously, the “National Interest” observer wonders.

National Interest: British destroyer is unlikely to frighten Moscow




“The last time, reminds The National Interest, the British invaded Crimea in 1854, when the Anglo-French expeditionary corps seized Sevastopol. This time we are talking only about one destroyer HMS Diamond, on board of which there will be about 60 marines. This warship will lead the NATO tactical group and help defend the 650 British soldiers participating in secret exercises in Ukraine, ”the article cites the channel. RT.

Although the destroyers of the type 45 and are the newest acquisition of the Royal Navy, but their engines fail when the ships are in warm waters, the publication said.

“Fortunately for the Royal Navy, the Black Sea is not in the tropics,” the author says ironically.

Earlier, British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said:
The UK sends a clear message that we are committed to defending democracy around the world and support the sovereignty of Ukraine, its independence and territorial integrity.


"Meanwhile," it is unlikely that Putin and his government will take this step of the British as a special threat, because in military terms, one ship with 60 marines on board looks like a purely symbolic gesture, "- said the columnist.

If Russia’s containment turns into war, then this “destroyer, even as part of a NATO tactical group, will not last long off the Russian coast, which has military aircraft, coastal defense missiles and near which there are a lot of Black Sea ships fleet”, The article says. Also, he will not be able to help Kiev in the event of a “land-based Russian invasion”.

According to the author, “Even as a symbol, one destroyer does not send a particularly strong signal that Britain is ready to fight with Russia for the sake of Ukraine’s salvation.”

Nevertheless, it is of interest that the British cruise to the Black Sea is part of the “more decisive” British policy: “At present, the Royal Air Force planes strike an IG (banned in the Russian Federation) in Iraq and Syria, the British military train Ukrainian soldiers, thousands of military personnel this summer will be deployed to Estonia and Poland, and Typhoon fighters to Romania, ”the article says.

In addition, the Typhoon fighters will take part in a joint exercise with Japan, and aircraft carriers such as the Queen Elizabeth, the construction of which should be completed in 2020, will be deployed in the South China Sea.

All this is a rather serious feat, considering that the composition of the Royal Navy has decreased to 19 destroyers and frigates, the composition of the Royal Air Force has also decreased, and in the British army there are less than 80 thousands of military personnel,
summarizes the author.
  • https://ru.pinterest.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    12 February 2017 16: 34
    to the naglosaks it seems to the infidel themselves to feel the effect of Russian electronic warfare equipment ...
    1. +3
      12 February 2017 17: 14
      The Black Sea is easily controlled from the Crimea. What kind of threat are we talking about? They will be impudent, they will play with them, as with Donald Cook.
      1. +9
        12 February 2017 17: 27
        Quote: oleg-gr
        What kind of threat are we talking about?

        When a stranger breaks into your doorstep and begins to dictate which room in your own apartment you do not (in his opinion) have the right to enter - how do you perceive it? There is nothing for these Tsingot masters to do in the Black Sea, all the more so to send “signals” to someone ...
        1. +4
          12 February 2017 17: 42
          They were not bothered yet to send signals. Honestly already sick. By God! Either Stoltenberg will send, then Bridlav will follow. Now, Fallon also signed up for the signalmen. Or signaling. And everyone strives to scare. Fear to catch up. Ursula from Germany with her Go.mo.seks not yet signaled for an hour? It will be really terrible there, unbearable. And in fact they really think that they will scare. belay
          1. +6
            12 February 2017 18: 00
            Well, let the signalmen work until the “semaphore” is cut down.
        2. +12
          12 February 2017 17: 46
          In this post about the destroyer, the most interesting part is 650 Britons secretly doing something in Ukraine. Are they preparing a new assault on New Russia there? And if you have to drape, then transport off the coast, and let the rest burn with a blue flame ...
        3. 0
          13 February 2017 01: 12
          ava09

          There is a convention, and these pelvis can be in the Black Sea for up to 21 days. Although I support you, the naglosaks stay away from our shores
          1. 0
            13 February 2017 03: 09
            National Interest

            the British send a warship to the Black Sea

            All this is a pretty serious feat.

            summarizes the author.
            laughing wassat
  2. +2
    12 February 2017 16: 37
    National Interest: British destroyer is unlikely to frighten Moscow
    "bastions" on the walls of the Kremlin put ....
    1. 0
      13 February 2017 01: 14
      Andrei Yurievich Yesterday, 16:37 New
      National Interest: the British destroyer is unlikely to scare Moscow "bastions" on the walls of the Kremlin put ....


      why so ironic. Enough of those in the Crimea ...
  3. +4
    12 February 2017 16: 39
    The goal of this step is to send Russia a signal: “Do not invade Ukraine.”
    but the fact that? feel
    British destroyer is unlikely to scare Moscow
    but should have? belay belay well tady-oh, boy, boy recourse
    1. +2
      12 February 2017 16: 51
      Izya Top - Izya lol do not foolishly lol Imagine this destroyer on the Moscow River, but as a guide the cow itself, or how is the queen? Britain! hi And you don’t speak Chinese wassat That's what you need to be afraid of !!! sad
    2. +2
      12 February 2017 16: 53
      Quote: izya top
      British destroyer is unlikely to scare Moscow should have? well tady-oh, boy, boy

      And I would have trained on the site of Moscow on this destroyer, when such a case presented itself, at the end of the exercises, one and a half liter British sailors could be missed from Massandra's reserves.
      1. +2
        12 February 2017 16: 55
        Quote: saturn.mmm
        half a liter from the stock Massandra

        yeah, and then the horses for reparations will still charge for wine recourse how to live next? request
        1. +2
          12 February 2017 17: 36
          Quote: izya top
          how to live next?

          Drink.
      2. Ren
        +4
        12 February 2017 20: 08
        Quote: saturn.mmm
        with British sailors half a liter can be missed from the stocks of Massandra.

        Drinking without chewing and only after they give an excursion to the monument to the fallen British in the Balaklava Valley (Attack of the Light Cavalry). And in farewell, everyone should be presented with a volume of Alexander Sergeyevich Pushkin with the only verse in all European languages ​​to “Slanderers of Russia”:
        So send us, vitias,
        His angry sons:
        There is a place for them in the fields of Russia,
        Among the coffins that are not theirs.
  4. +2
    12 February 2017 16: 47
    A good ship, it will be a pity to sink. if necessary ...
    1. Cat
      +1
      12 February 2017 20: 41
      I won’t even regret the wreath! And a tear stingy Pushcha!
      1. +2
        12 February 2017 22: 19
        Quote: Kotischa
        I won’t even regret the wreath! And a tear stingy Pushcha!

        What a sentimental you are, however!
        But where did you learn to squish your nose?
        Really in the trenches of Stalingrad? angry
  5. +1
    12 February 2017 16: 47
    Nonsense. The military needs to report to British taxpayers.
    Bullshit, window dressing ... The British and the Crimea - the question was decided in 1945 by Stalin ...
  6. +2
    12 February 2017 16: 48
    At first, I thought that we were talking about the Moscow missile cruiser, but after reading the article I thought that neither Moscow would be scared.
  7. +1
    12 February 2017 16: 51
    Shoot the soyuznichki began ....)))
  8. +2
    12 February 2017 16: 53
    Oops, the messenger was sent wassat laughing
    And I wonder how it’s an air defense destroyer (at least so PR request ) can help from the Black Sea the battalion of "bearers of democracy", who train local Aborigines somewhere in the steppe forests of the Ternopil region-Lviv region and other pieces of Ukraine? what
    That would shugan this next "beautiful" favorite Kaptsov fellow winked feel
    1. +1
      12 February 2017 22: 24
      Quote: Rurikovich
      And I wonder how this anti-aircraft defense destroyer (at least so proprietary) can help from the Black Sea the battalion of "bearers of democracy"

      When they hurry off to flee, EM will go to Odessa (if she remains proparashensky) and take compatriots on board.
      This is called evacuation. Yeah ...
  9. +16
    12 February 2017 16: 53
    National Interest: British destroyer is unlikely to frighten Moscow

    I can’t agree here. I think it will scare, and how! It was 15 years ago in St. Petersburg. Then, with a friendly visit, an English warship docked (I don’t remember which one). Right next to Lieutenant Schmidt’s bridge. And the English sailors roamed along the promenade. I was surprised to see that there were many female persons among them. That's right, because language does not turn to call them women. Scary all as a selection! Horror! And I doubt that since then the British gene pool has changed for the better. Therefore, of course, they will scare Moscow and everyone ...
    ps Guys, love our women - they are all beautiful!
    1. +3
      12 February 2017 20: 40
      Everywhere where the Catholic Inquisition frolic, or, in this case, its Anglican counterpart, there is a shortage of beautiful women. Under the distribution of witch-hunts, the most beautiful ones usually fell (well, an honest Christian cannot become so pretty without the help of witchcraft and the devil himself). Here is the gene pool of beauty and povybil, in accordance with the teachings of Darwin.
      Well, again, the specifics of the profession. Beautiful will arrange personal life in a civilian, and ugly ones to get their portion x .. simple feminine happiness, they are looking for him where there are many unaccounted hungry men. Well, the truth is that with the growth in the west of non-traditional orientations and identifications, such tactics can fail.
      1. +1
        12 February 2017 22: 59
        Quote: Nagan
        The beautiful ones will arrange a personal life in a civilian, and the ugly ones, to get their portion of x ... simple female happiness, are looking for him where there are a lot of unaccounted hungry men.

        Our signalmen were very beautiful, and in RAV the girls were also cool.
        1. 0
          13 February 2017 04: 06
          Your inquisition didn’t frolic
  10. +1
    12 February 2017 16: 58
    In addition to the National Interest and Sivkov, does anyone write anything at all?
    (I apologize to Opus, Andrei from Chelyabinsk and Kaptsov, the authors are very interesting, though each is different)
  11. 0
    12 February 2017 17: 06
    Well, it is directly necessary for one of ours with the "Caliber" to watch for this time in the North Sea to protect shipping from pirates and to support Irish fighters against the British colonial regime.
  12. 0
    12 February 2017 17: 12
    If the Secret Special Forces training is SBS ... A very combat-ready unit ...
  13. +1
    12 February 2017 17: 16
    We put something on this “message”.
  14. +1
    12 February 2017 17: 17
    What what, but NI writes sometimes interesting things, for example I liked
    full of ships of the Black Sea Fleet

    Recently, attacks on the insignificant potential of the World Cup in the region suddenly stopped and suddenly such curtsies. It is clear that after the Turkish coup, the Turkish Navy thinned out de facto (some corvettes and destroyers were removed from the balance sheet) due to the thrown out topic of the coup pilots of the admirals, who "took" part of the ships in an unknown direction, but this obvious stupidity did not last long as a motive. Now the layout of the theater has changed, especially after a demonstration of the capabilities of the Caspian flotilla. In the end, everything can happen as with Cook, only now this destroyer will be met and escorted by Varshavyanka, shelling him with waste.
  15. +1
    12 February 2017 17: 51
    Ukraine will be OUR, at least drive off all your smelly fleet, led by Her Majesty to the Black Sea! "And do not be interested in our life ...!" (from).
  16. +1
    12 February 2017 17: 55
    Quote: oleg-gr
    The Black Sea is easily controlled from the Crimea. What kind of threat are we talking about? They will be impudent, they will play with them, as with Donald Cook.

    It has engines from Rolls-Royce, which produces aircraft engines. It can take off from fright. The Type 45 destroyers are equipped with two advanced WR-21 gas turbine engines with an intercooler and a regenerative (IHP) heat exchanger, which provide significant savings in fuel and space on the ship. The recuperator recovers energy by working from exhaust gases, which increases the efficiency of fuel use. Ecology, their mother is in hot water.! He will throw the sea with sawdust and he will grunt.
  17. cap
    +2
    12 February 2017 18: 25
    National Interest: British destroyer is unlikely to frighten Moscow


    Well at least they admit it .. We hit twice, once on the head, the second on the lid of the coffin. Forgot?
  18. 0
    12 February 2017 18: 42
    The British will soon have a very balanced Navy of the open ocean. 45 along with two aircraft carriers and new frigates. Air group f35, there are airplanes. It seems like new helicopters make drills. 45 is considered the best in air defense, for anti-submarine warfare new frigates. So in the open ocean after the United States, they will be. Near the French, but they only have one aircraft carrier and less destroyers. China is building aircraft carriers, but which planes will be there? Afar radars on destroyers next to samsons will stand? What about rockets? With AGS at the end site? Soon. So guys this will be the second after the US fleet in the next decade
    1. 0
      12 February 2017 19: 33
      Quote: ukoft
      new helicopter drills do. 45 is considered the best in air defense, for anti-submarine warfare new frigates. So in the open ocean after the us, they will

      in all of this the key word is will. but when this "will" comes, God alone knows. while it’s just a concussion.
      1. 0
        12 February 2017 19: 59
        It seems like they are close to the goal. Two aircraft carriers with winged friends will be by 2020. Helicopters should give for 2 years, I always wondered why they wouldn’t make a convertiplane. Inertia and so onservatism chtoli. Here, according to frigates, cheap and massive (on the scale of the British of course) seem to have decided on a replacement 23. If no force majeure then in 3-5 years they will take on a form very dangerous
        1. 0
          12 February 2017 22: 48
          No one really needs a tiltroot, dear dog and not very heavy.
          1. 0
            13 February 2017 08: 03
            Range and speed.
    2. 0
      13 February 2017 01: 22
      Quote: ukoft
      45 is considered the best in air defense

      Yeah, the trough with a displacement of eight kilotons is the best in air defense! But what can he do except air defense?
      Quote: ukoft
      It seems like new helicopters make drills.

      Oh, how do we mean DRLO helicopters are viciously criticized, but are normal in the British Navy?
      Quote: ukoft
      So guys this will be the second after the US fleet in the next decade

      Sixth place, they will not rise above, and that is in question.
      1. 0
        13 February 2017 08: 04
        I wonder whom and by what parameters did you set higher?
        1. 0
          13 February 2017 09: 43
          Quote: ukoft
          I wonder whom and by what parameters did you set higher?

          Americans first
          Russian second
          Chinese third
          French fourth
          Fifth Hindus
          British sixth
          I wanted to put the Japanese in sixth, but their underwater strategic component is frankly weak. The Russian fleet is superior to all in the shock anti-ship component, but we have a shit with landing operations and control communications
          1. 0
            13 February 2017 10: 07
            Who is comparable strike component m 2sch aircraft carriers with a displacement of 60 thousand tons. Not Russia, not France does not possess. Japan can put on its helicopter carriers f35, redid the deck. The rest is deaf. For destroyers, only Japan has normal. And then the radar is not afar. For low-flying targets, it works poorly as aliberki. Russia has good divers. On the surface dull. The Chinese have no flyers and destroyers with air defense similar to the 80s of the last century. Also the Indians. Technologically, China and India have no analogues f35 and daring.
            1. 0
              13 February 2017 12: 57
              Quote: ukoft
              Who is comparable strike component m 2sch aircraft carriers with a displacement of 60 thousand tons.

              These aircraft carriers are still under construction. At the moment, the Royal Navy's strike forces have provided 13 frigates of type 23 armed with harpoons and 7 diesel-electric submarines with the same harpoons. The British fleet was on my list thanks to strategic submarine missile carriers.
              Quote: ukoft
              Japan can put on its helicopter carriers f35, redid the deck.

              This is an uncertain future.
              Quote: ukoft
              And then the radar is not afar.

              These AFARs were given to you, they are certainly good, but not an end in themselves, over-the-horizon radars are much more in demand.
              Quote: ukoft
              The Chinese have no flyers and destroyers with air defense similar to the 80s of the last century.

              The Chinese will crush the number.
              Quote: ukoft
              Technologically, China and India have no analogues f35 and daring.

              F-35 f firebox - its value is doubtful.
              Darling has already been written about above - the machine is certainly perfect, but it is highly specialized, except for air defense it does not know how to do anything and its value outside the AUG is zero point ten. Perhaps the British are on the American path trying to put elements of a missile defense system on ships.
              1. 0
                13 February 2017 17: 17
                In 2020, aviks will be. F35 underestimate not worth it. Given its capabilities. Superhornets just do not change them. This is shock power. No one has any analogues except the USA and is not expected. Of course, this is a stripped-down version, without refueling and a helicopter drill. But this has nothing to oppose. Aircraft modified and run in. Air defense is better than dering and vliberki will not give. Close are the brothers from France in the face of the horizon, but it seems there are only three of them. Plo 23 will cope with it and the replacement is on. With submarine forces, they also hold the level. Debt discussion on afar may turn out, let's not here. Over-the-horizon with inconspicuous not very cope. But Samson located so high few will kill. The number of China against f35 in the open ocean and with obsolete pro.
                1. 0
                  13 February 2017 18: 40
                  Quote: ukoft
                  In 2020, aviks will be.

                  And if tomorrow is war?
                  Quote: ukoft
                  F35 underestimate not worth it.

                  He was overestimated so much and no one changes the superhornets for them, even the Americans realized that the superhornets are better than this crap - F35.
                  Quote: ukoft
                  No one has any analogues except the USA and is not expected.

                  Russia, China, France, Sweden have analogs ....
                  4 internal suspension points, six external, do you realize that in the shock version it will shine like any other apparatus of the previous generation?
                  Quote: ukoft
                  This is shock power.

                  This "strike force" of yours is simply an analogue of the MiG-29 at the price of a squadron of these same MiG-29s.
                  1. 0
                    13 February 2017 19: 17
                    Let's get more specifics. Others have nothing for war at all. They are more ready than others. They are more ready than others. And hornnts will change, a matter of time. The price of one in f35 without an engine of 80 limits. And the downward trend is going, and with afar and ols das. He has no equal. 360 degree covers. The first to see the shoot and forget. At what distance does the radar of destroyers 52 or 55 of the Chinese Navy identify it, for example?
                    1. 0
                      13 February 2017 19: 27
                      Quote: ukoft
                      Let's get more specifics.

                      What kind of injustice? Why can you be without specifics, but I can’t?
                      Quote: ukoft
                      At what distance does the radar of destroyers 52 or 55 of the Chinese Navy identify it, for example?

                      So you tell us this and you raised this question.
                      Quote: ukoft
                      The price of one in f35 without an engine of 80 limits.

                      Is this the whole cunning of the Americans - without an engine, without an expensive stealth cover, have you forgotten anything?
                      1. 0
                        14 February 2017 12: 33
                        Yes, it is unfair of me. The EPR of the superhornet is 1 m2, while f35 is 0,05 m2 in the frontal projection. Theoretically identify and naturally detect Hornet can at a distance of 250 km, then f35 only at 50 km. In the decimeter range. The difference is very significant
                      2. 0
                        14 February 2017 12: 37
                        Well, in the event of a collision with w15, the f35 round-robin ols will leave no chance for the enemy. Probably worth discussing about ranged
              2. 0
                13 February 2017 17: 23
                Chinese destroyers are based on the technology of 80-90 years. How soon they will see f35 big question. And from the pro based on the c300 against low-flying targets .... I'm afraid it will be too late. Also india
                1. 0
                  13 February 2017 18: 52
                  Quote: ukoft
                  Chinese destroyers are based on the technology of 80-90 years. How soon they will see f35 big question.

                  Question? Maybe later? Maybe early?
                  The Americans have placed too much emphasis on invisibility to the detriment of other characteristics, whatever the buzz is for them, but it is wonderful for us.
                  1. 0
                    13 February 2017 19: 20
                    So how soon will they see? In what frequency range does the radar detect 55 destroyers ??? Probably much later than Hornet.
                    1. 0
                      14 February 2017 17: 48
                      Quote: ukoft
                      So how soon will they see? In what frequency range does the radar detect 55 destroyers ??? Probably much later than Hornet.

                      The F-35 has the advantage if both planes are hunting freely, but this is a hypothetical situation, a spherical horse in a vacuum. But one hundred Chinese planes will go in bulk to an American aircraft carrier (or any other target that needs to be defended at all costs), and they will need to be stopped as they say, all F-35s will die, but the enemy will not be stopped.
  19. 0
    12 February 2017 18: 44
    Have you forgotten about the "Black Prince"?
  20. 0
    12 February 2017 19: 21
    It turns out, the mouse decided to scare the cat. The main thing is who is the cat and who is the mouse. Well, you won’t change nature.
  21. +1
    12 February 2017 19: 29
    This heroic act of the English resembles a childhood impression, when "adult" boys of 10-12 years old go to steal neighboring cucumbers, and after them a small 5-6 years old runs and shouts, "take me!"
  22. +1
    12 February 2017 19: 29
    "in the event of an invasion of Ukraine ...", that is, there is no invasion yet? with what sanction then? and I also really liked about the SECRET teachings))) or is it still a "translation difficulty"?
  23. 0
    12 February 2017 19: 32
    But how interesting is the resource of this destroyer in a real battle, how many minutes? I think a couple of minutes and he sleeps safely at the bottom of the Black Sea.
    1. +2
      12 February 2017 22: 48
      Quote: KIBL
      But how interesting is the resource of this destroyer in a real battle, how many minutes? I think a couple of minutes and he sleeps safely at the bottom of the Black Sea.

      Given the recent whining in the press about the noisiness of Her Majesty’s ships, this will be a contrasting target for 636.3. First 3m-54, then USET-80 and we can assume that the "Admiral Belgrano" avenged!
      1. +1
        13 February 2017 02: 09
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        Given the recent whining in the press about the noisiness of Her Majesty’s ships, this will be a contrasting target for 636.3. First 3m-54, then USET-80 and we can assume that the "Admiral Belgrano" avenged!

        Yes, I agree. But the contents of the lateworks are enough for him.
        The first month of autonomy ended, and for the second week the blind race for the largest and most powerful aircraft carrier lasted. The “silence” mode was abruptly replaced by the full speed, then again drift on the depth stabilizer without a move, a change in depth and again a race. And all this is on readiness number one: neither eat properly, nor wash, or sleep. People are completely exhausted, latches are full, fresh water is running out - all these are consequences of the silence regime.
        And now, finally, a reward for perseverance, here it is, the materialization of the dream of the commander and the entire crew. A boat on the depth stabilizer without a move, everyone is silent, straining, and the acoustics catch their group target with their sensitive electronic and human ears, and in the middle there is something that can easily be classified as an aircraft carrier! Gee-s !!! Estimated, counted - the main goal will pass by ten to twelve cable. Here it is, the dream of youth and all subsequent life! Well, why, why, why on the planet at this moment the world ?! Ahhh! ..
        - Combat alert, torpedo attack! Do not use bells and chestnuts! All teams and reports - only by phone!
        “Well, scribe, it began,” escaped from the crew. - Beat the adversary.
        But the war is cold, time is peaceful, you cannot attack, even imitate the attack ... Of course, wait! The main thing is that the deputy and the special agent do not come to their senses, otherwise they will fly: it is not allowed! there is a directive! and in addition to the directive, they also have their own informers, that is, these ... informants. Who are they? In theory, they should be among the officers. Only telephoned combat posts and command posts are notified of combat alert, walking between compartments is forbidden ... and the target spurs itself for rapprochement with a thirty-node move, without changing course. Just about to fly by ... We must do something, somehow designate a torpedo attack, let them know that the Russian Ivan is not basting, and do not think about impunity ...
        - Boatswain, float to the periscope depth on the stabilizer.
        Teams - at least, all at a glance, everyone works, laying out one hundred percent.
        - Raise the periscope.
        The disheveled deputy with a special agent arrived in the central one. Look, in a hurry, they didn’t even manage to put a gloss on. Begin to slowly move into the atmosphere. The commander is to the periscope to avoid unnecessary questions. In about five minutes, the aircraft carrier will be on the beam. There he is, full of lights, taking planes, which means he will not change course. BIP produces data for firing - everything is on the machine. The commander from the periscope - to the phone:
        - Mineer! How long does it take to free the fourth and fifth devices from torpedoes? .. How much ?! Well, you ooh ... .... Five minutes! And to prepare these devices for shooting through the air! Clear?!
        Trying to intervene just about the situation, the deputy with a special officer was numb, like the admiralty anchors on the Neva embankment. There is a directive of the General Staff with a recommendation to avoid imitating combat attacks, which requires ensuring its own security, preventing collisions and bulk, and something else about the international situation ...
        The miner also jammed, and there was no clear answer "yes." Here are those here. Preparing, getting ready, and everything went to pi ... deja at party meetings. Yes, in wartime it’s easier: I entered the shooting data - and they are perfect! - and "Pli!" And here all the devices are loaded with combat torpedoes, all in full. True, it is possible to free two vehicles from torpedoes in case of emergency exit from a sunken boat. Well, free, time is running out ...
        Time is running out, the aircraft carrier is about to catch up with the boat, and the miner's “is” will not sound at all, and the deputy and special officer will soon recover.
        Then the mechanic - found, Christmas trees, a way out! - The largest opposition and secret mocker of the commanding utopias. He had long been asking for “good” to purge the latrines (only the doctor’s in the isolation ward remained empty), but the commander always forbade - the purge sound unmasked in a swoop. The mechanic cursed and claimed that we were soon taught the smell even in the Pentagon.
        - ... miner! ...
        “Dragging the kndir,” the mechanic interrupted, “I am ready to shoot the latrine!” The effect is the same, but the benefits are greater: there is no need to relieve pressure from the compartments, especially since it is already excessive and the air consumption for this business is less. And there will be no violation of the directive. BUT?
        The thought itself is not bad, but ... somehow it is ... and there is no other way out ...
        “Well, that’s a completely different matter,” the deputy, almost out of his stupor, turned to the special agent who was starting to leave.
        “Okay, fur, convinced,” the commander said. - Blow out the latrines on command.
        And himself - to the periscope.
        In the rare ruptures of the clouds, a quarter of the moon was visible. The lunar path escaped towards the carrier, approaching inexorably, like the collapse of capitalism.
        - Mechanic, prepare a turbine for giving the course. What is the matter with the latrine?
        “The turbine is ready, the latrine apparatuses of the second and third compartments are ready to fire,” the mechanic reported, “there is a proposal to lower the periscope: Kingston purge the latrines on the same frame with the periscope, not to pollute the optics for a short time ...”
        “Got it, got it, mechanic ... BIP!” Report shooting data with two "products"! - I listened to the data, checked the periscope and gave the command to lower it.
        - Mechanic, oats!
        - There is a tov!
        - Pli!
        - Got it! - answered the mechanic. - The second and third, blow out the latrines, do not spare the air!
        After some, very short time, a characteristic smell went into the central one, and everyone turned their noses.

        Source: http://fishki.net/1310854-mertvaja-petlja-na-podv
        odnoj-lodke.html © Fishki.net
    2. 0
      12 February 2017 23: 01
      Quote: KIBL
      at the bottom of the Black Sea.

      By the way, the bottom of the Black Sea is very decent.
  24. 0
    12 February 2017 19: 39
    Conditional British send conditional signals, not having the slightest real intentions to fight with someone for someone. Yes, and this is not possible. am
  25. +1
    12 February 2017 20: 10
    Here is who else would put England and the USA in their place, otherwise they will climb everywhere, like a plague epidemic. England is high time to get out, from many points of the World, from Gibraltar for example
  26. 0
    12 February 2017 22: 33
    Nevertheless, it is of interest that the British cruise to the Black Sea is part of the “more decisive” British policy: “At present, the Royal Air Force planes strike an IG (banned in the Russian Federation) in Iraq and Syria, the British military train Ukrainian soldiers, thousands of military personnel this summer will be deployed to Estonia and Poland, and Typhoon fighters to Romania, ”the article says.
    In addition, the Typhoon fighters will take part in a joint exercise with Japan, and aircraft carriers such as the Queen Elizabeth, the construction of which should be completed in 2020, will be deployed in the South China Sea.


    It's time to send the "Peter the Great" to cut circles around the British Isles, along with a couple of 11356 frigates with Calibers. Maybe the British realize that they need to keep their armed forces with them, and not distribute democracy all over the world.
    Jokes jokes, but even if we sell Argentina 15 second-hand MiGs-29-x, it will already become a headache for the Armed Forces of Her Majesty
  27. +2
    12 February 2017 23: 47
    dear sirs, peers, and any other shelamud from the British dymeralty .. I remind you of the Russian proverb \ ancient \ without knowing ford, do not go into the water.
  28. +1
    13 February 2017 02: 22
    and what mines from the second world did not remain in the black sea? wassat
  29. +1
    17 February 2017 18: 34
    Well, now we’ll check the British, how are they with the nerves, will they not write off the reports? And if God forbid what conflict, then the Briton will not last afloat for about 20 minutes, so his rattling of weapons is for his reassurance, but how they determine that they are in the sights of our missiles, here we look at the nature of the British.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"