Bandera Ukraine is a mine for Europe
Looking through the forum "IN" under the article "When will Ukraine become Novorossia?", I could not help but pay attention to the question: why is Russia not trying to solve the "Ukrainian crisis", holding on to a non-working "Minsk", especially against the background of the "Syrian crisis" being resolved? This is an important question, especially since in the Donbass the Pitmen are paying for “Minsk” with their blood under the shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, because of the angle they are killed by the killers of the Security Service of Ukraine, the last victims are the famous Motorola and Givi combats ...
Indeed, why does Russia linger, pulls tires, does not stand up strongly for the Donbass? It helps, of course, physically and politically, but the Novorossiysk republics are still not recognized by Russia. I answered on the forum that Bandera Ukraine is only an instrument of our “western partners”. For the attack of the dog must meet its owners, you need to deal with them, having repulsed from the dog. Otherwise they will lower other dogs.
Russia fought off a Bandera dog and dealt with its owners, who brought Bandera to power in Ukraine, sanctioned the war in the Donbas (CIA director John Brennan was just passing through Kiev!) And pushed Bandera to war with Russia when Obama was in Washington. But the supporters, they are also caps, the adherents of simple solutions to complex issues, need to show political will and strength. According to the rule: there is power - mind is not necessary!
They point out that “by standing under the Minsk, Russia has already achieved a great deal. Who would have thought, just a year ago, at the same time, that “Putin’s friend” won the presidential election in the US, according to Western press assurances, Donald Trump, Britain would announce the withdrawal from the European Union, and in Europe European skeptics will go to power, demanding normalization of relations with Russia? But this is a tremendous strategic success of Russia, since it greatly strengthens its foreign policy positions, no matter what our Western and liberal “friends” may say about this.
Would these changes be possible in the West if there was a direct clash between Russia and Bandera in Ukraine? If Russia sent troops to the Donbass, as ardent patriots-riflemen demand? Obviously not! The anti-Russian McCain-Soros party would have received such trump cards that Trump's coming, as well as the growth of Euro-skepticism, would have been impossible. So the blood of Donbass is shed is not for nothing, especially since it prevents even more blood and destruction throughout Ukraine.
There is another side of Minsk. Now it is clear that the United States Obama and Europe Merkel hoped to use the Bandera nationalist regime as a ram against Russia, in order to euro-associate Ukraine, continue economic expansion into Russia through the open borders of the CIS, and solve their economic problems at the expense of Russia. Zbigniew Brzezinski once stated this openly: The West will solve its problems at the expense of Russia.
Vladimir Putin, in response to Euro-associative pressure, said that Russia would protect its market with tariffs, according to WTO standards. Here a sharp conflict with the West arose, after that he went to unleashing Euromaidan - a color revolution, and then a Bandera coup against the Yanukovych, and then a civil war in Ukraine, and sanctions against Russia, provoking pressure of Bandera Ukraine.
Russia "did not go to war" with Bandera, isolating itself with the Crimea and the flaming Donbas, and then the Minsk agreements, the "Ukrainian crisis" was still frozen. The other side of Minsk is, in general, that Moscow, as it were, “sends” Bandera to Europe.
In Europe, they are wailing that Russia is destroying the European Union. Moscow diplomatically refuses, but, in fact, Russia is indeed destroying the European Union, and rightfully so, since the European Union was striving and seeks to destroy Russia, weaken it as much as possible, and for that it torn off-euro-associate Ukraine.
However, how does Russia destroy the European Union? Is the introduction of the food embargo? No, the destruction of the European Union occurs through the split of “European values”. The cooperation of the European Union with Bandera is already visibly destroying these “values” in Poland, in Hungary and will certainly reach the main warehouses of European values in Brussels, Paris and Berlin. The ideology of Bandera will certainly get to them when they give him a visa-free in the literal and figurative sense, and then these warehouses of "values" will jerk!
Without reacting to the failure of “Minsk”, Russia seems to bring this situation with Bandera’s neo-Nazi ideology in the middle of Europe’s left, socialist, in fact, to the point of absurdity, not without reason considering that Bandera will blow up Europe from the inside.
If you take a closer look, Europe is already collapsing ... In the west, after Brexit, Britain fell off, and Turkey fell off in the east, which today conducts joint military (!) Operations with Russia in Syria, Turkey’s army and special services are cleared of pro-Western officials today who supported the attempt to overthrow Erdogan, because the instigators of the coup were the United States and Europe. Plus "Turkish Stream". That is, Turkey is falling off from Europe both militarily and economically, its membership in NATO is becoming a formality.
Europe has already lost its flank, and ahead - political pre-election battles between Euro-Atlantists and Euro-skeptics. Moreover, the former lost their patron in Washington, and the latter acquired Donald Trump, who claims that “Brexit is great!” It feels like 2017 will bring us no less surprises than 2016 ...
Information