February 1917 of the year in the province

61
February 1917 of the year in the province

Rally at the Anchor Square on the occasion of the proclamation of the "Kronstadt Republic." 1917 Photo of the Year


The 1917 revolutions of the year spawned dozens of myths, most of which survived to the 100 anniversary. We observe them in the speeches of politicians, on the pages of school and university textbooks. The most false are the myths about the bloodless February Revolution, about the democratic Provisional Government, which was overthrown with German money by the Bolsheviks, the “stolen victory” myth — that is, the Bolsheviks saved Germany from defeat, etc. Almost all of our interpreters stories reduce the period of Russian life between February and October of 1917 to the events in Petrograd. The power of the Provisional Government was relatively strong there, and there was a constant confrontation between the Cabinet of Ministers and the Soviets; there were no nationalists or separatists. However, most of the territory of the former Russian Empire was very poorly controlled by the Provisional Government, and some territories, and first of all, the outskirts, were practically independent from the central government.



And let's see what happened in the province. Given the volume of this publication, I will consider only two examples: atypical - Kronstadt and typical - Tver province.

OFFICERS KILLED IMMEDIATELY

March 3 (16), 1917, that is, the day after the abdication of Nicholas II, in the Helsingfors raid on the battleship "Andrew the First-Called", the sailors demanded to lower the Andreevsky flag and raise the red one. The lieutenant commander Gennady Bubnov refused and was raised with hostility. This served as a signal for reprisal against the officers. On the gangway of St. Andrew the First-Called, Admiral A.K. Nebolsin. Admiral R.N., the chief commander of the Kronstadt port, was also killed. Viren, chief of staff of the Kronstadt port, Admiral A.G. Butakov; March 2 - Commander of the Baltic fleet Admiral A.I. Nepenin; after them the commandant of the Sveaborg fortress, Lieutenant General for the Navy V.N. Protopopov, commanders of the 1st and 2nd Kronstadt naval crews N. Stronsky and A. Girs, commander of the battleship "Emperor Alexander II" captain 1st rank N. Povalishin, commander of the cruiser "Aurora" captain 1st rank M. Nikolsky and many others naval and land officers.

By 15 in March, the Baltic Fleet lost 120 officers, of whom 76 was killed (in Helsingfors - 45, in Kronstadt - 24, in Revel - 5 and in Petrograd - 2). In Kronstadt, moreover, at least 12 land army officers were killed. Four officers committed suicide, and 11 went missing. More 600 officers were attacked. For comparison: all the fleets and flotilla of Russia have lost 245 officers since the beginning of the First World War.

In Helsingfors, around 50 officers were arrested and in Kronstadt around 300. A number of officers, fleeing from mob law, themselves wished to be arrested. In Helsingfors, most of the officers were released in the first days after the events. But the rest, about 20 people, mostly involved in suppressing the Sveaborg uprising of the 1906 of the year, were in prison, at least in July of the 1917 of the year. In Kronstadt at the end of May, 180 people continued to be under arrest. The provisional government tried to transfer them to Petrograd in separate groups. “But,” complained the Minister of Justice P.N. Pereverzev at the congress of the 25 officers' deputies in May - huge crowds gathered each time, demanding that not a single officer be taken out of Kronstadt ... And, taking into account the implacable mood in Kronstadt, we did not take decisive measures so as not to cause violence against the imprisoned officers ".

The current liberals and monarchists are killing all officers of the Bolsheviks. Well, who else? And over time, according to the formula of Dr. Goebbels, a lie repeated a thousand times becomes true. But the evidence of the participation of the Bolsheviks in the March murders, or even the direct incitement of sailors by them, no one can bring. By the way, contemporaries, eyewitnesses of the murders, do not even mention the Bolsheviks.

But the connection with the Freemasons from the Provisional Government, of course, was. A story about them is a topic for a separate work. I will give little-known details of the murder of Admiral Adrian Ivanovich Nepenin.

WHAT HAPPENED IN THE KONSTADT

With the onset of unrest in Petrograd, the head of the Baltic Sea Mine Defense, Vice Admiral Andrei Semenovich Maksimov began campaigning for electing himself, dear Commander of the fleet. In this, Maximov was assisted by his flag officer, Senior Lieutenant K.E. Vasilevsky and all the staff scribes.

Maximov’s handcuffers gathered on Helsingfors Street a small rally of sailors who “chose” a new comflot. And then Maksimov and his chief assistants, captain 2 of rank L. Muravyov and senior lieutenant K. Vasilevsky, hung with red bows and ribbons, got into the car, which the armed sailors literally stuck to, also hung with red bows. Maximov went to the staff ship "Krechet" to announce the election of Admiral Nepenin. But he firmly stated to him that he did not recognize any elections, that he and the fleet had obeyed the Provisional Government, and to whom it would indicate, that he would surrender command.

Maximov left, but still raised the badge of the fleet commander on the vehicle. Soon he showed up at the Station Square. Meanwhile, Admiral Nepenin was killed, and thus, the command of the fleet had actually passed to him as the eldest. So Admiral Maximov became the commander of the fleet. The rhetorical question: could the vice-admiral act on his own, without enlisting the support of the Petrograd masons?

What is the fate of Maximov? In the position of a comflot, he remains up to 2 June 1917, and calmly looks at the massacres of officers and the complete collapse of the fleet. Well, in September 1917, Maximov - Chief of the Naval Staff of the Supreme Commander.

Already 2 March 1917, the Provisional Government issued an order No. 169 on the appointment of a member of the State Duma, Viktor Nikolaevich Pepeliaev, as commander of the port and city of Kronstadt and as commissar of the Provisional Government. 3 March 1917, the Pepeliaev arrived in Kronstadt. On the same day, a garrison meeting was held, which elected an executive body, called the “Council of Ten”. Its chairman was the government commissioner Pepelyaev. The garrison assembly decided that each military unit should send two deputies to the Council of military deputies.

The next day, March 4, deputies were elected to the Council of Workers' Deputies, and on March 5, the first meeting was held in the building of the Commercial Assembly, at which the following members were elected: FPP worker. Serov and the Executive Committee composed of 10 people. And 8 March, another 8 people were elected by the executive committee.

On March 15, at a meeting of the Council of Military Deputies, General N.V. was elected commandant of the Kronstadt fortress. Gerasimov, and the head of the Naval Forces, Senior Lieutenant Peter Nikolaevich Lamanov.

March 10 The Provisional Government offered the Kronstadt garrison and the courts to swear allegiance to him. The response of the Kronstadt Soviet was: “The free people do not need to swear. Not the people should give the oath of allegiance to the Provisional Government, but the Provisional Government to the people. ”

13 (26) March between the Commissioner of the Provisional Government Pepelyaev and the Council, a conflict arose over the candidacy for the post of chief of the Kronstadt police. As a result, Pepelyaev resigned. According to some reports, he was even arrested by sailors.

In the absence of other possibilities, the Provisional Government launched a massive ideological attack on the fortress. March 18 Comrade of the Petrograd Soviet, Member of the State Duma MI MI arrived in Kronstadt Skobelev.

Well, March 18 from Oranienbaum rolled the car procession of Kerensky himself across the ice. He reported directly to the Council (the former Maritime Club) and began to shout something at the window pane to the assembled crowd. Well, then I went to the rally at the Manege.

There, Kerensky spoke with emotions about the significance of the February revolution, then about the struggle of the Russian people against the autocracy. In conclusion, he urged those present to support the Provisional Government.

Bolshevik Council member Semen Roshal, a member of the executive committee of the Council, welcomed Kerensky only as a friend of the chairman of the Petrograd Soviet, and not as a minister of the Provisional Government.

In response, Kerensky, in tears, rushed to embrace Roshal. At this presentation ended.

On April 5, the commander of the Petrograd Military District, General L.G., arrived in Kronstadt. Kornilov with the Serbian General Popovic. The gold-generals annoyed the sailors, and only a few dozen people gathered to listen to Kornilov on Yakornaya Square. I note that in Moscow and other cities, the appearance of Kornilov caused a storm of enthusiasm among the crowd of inhabitants, especially the female sex.

16 (29) of May, the Kronstadt Council adopted a Resolution, which stated: "In matters of state order, we enter into direct relations with the Council of Workers 'and Soldiers' Deputies of the city of Petrograd."

In fact, this meant that the Kronstadt Soviet was the only authority in the city and the fortress. The provisional government considered the situation in Kronstadt "threatening and completely unacceptable."

VICTORY WAS STOLEN WITHOUT PARTICIPATION OF BOLSHEVIKS

It is curious that the creation of the "Kronstadt Republic" greatly angered ... Lenin. The deputy chairman of the Kronstadt Council, Fedor Raskolnikov, recalled:

“- What happened here? What's the matter? What does the creation of the Kronstadt Republic mean? .. The Central Committee does not understand and does not approve of your policy. You both will have to go to St. Petersburg for an explanation with Ilyich, ”announced Fedorov (the Kronstadt Bolshevik) to me and S. Roshal.

After consulting, we concluded that Semyon Roshal needed to stay in Kronstadt, and I would go to St. Petersburg.

The speedboat took me along with G. Fedorov to Nikolaevskaya Embankment, and after a while we knocked on the door of the Pravda editorial office, which was then located on the Moika.

“Come in,” came the well-known, distinct voice of Ilyich.

We opened the door. IN AND. Lenin sat close to the desk and bent his head low over the paper. In a nervous handwriting, he fluently wrote another article for Pravda.


The head of the Provisional Government, Alexander Kerensky (in the car - on the left) and the appointed commander of the port and city of Kronstadt, Viktor Pepelyaev. 1917 Photo of the Year[center] [/ center]

When he had finished writing, he put the pen aside and threw a gloomy look at me.

- What have you done there? Is it possible to perform such actions without consulting with the Central Committee? This is a violation of elementary party discipline. We will shoot for such things ...

I began by explaining that the resolution on the transfer of power into the hands of the Kronstadt Soviet was adopted on the initiative of non-partisans.

“It was necessary to make fun of them,” Lenin interrupted me. - It was necessary for them to prove that declaring the Soviet power in one Kronstadt, separately from the rest of Russia, is utopia, it is an obvious absurdity.

I pointed out that at the time this issue was resolved, the leaders of the Bolshevik faction were not in the Council. Then I described in detail Ilyich that, in essence, the situation in Kronstadt was all the time such that the local Council had full power, and the representative of the Provisional Government, Commissioner Pepelyaev, played absolutely no role. Thus, the decision of the Kronstadt Council only formalized and consolidated the real situation ”.

23 May in Kronstadt without any warning arrived Minister of Posts and Telegraphs I.G. Tsereteli and Minister of Labor M.I. Skobelev. At an emergency meeting of the executive committee, convened on the occasion of their arrival, Tsereteli stated that he and Skobelev were seconded by the Provisional Government with a special assignment to achieve a definite agreement with the Kronstadt Soviet.

Negotiations in the Executive Committee lasted all night. The result was a large resolution - a few pages of empty chatter, but the essence: "Regarding the Commissioner of the Provisional Government, it was decided that he would not be appointed from Petrograd, but should be elected by the Kronstadt Council and approved by the Provisional Government."

Well, the Kronstadters never arrested the arrested officers of the Provisional Government.

In the end, the compromise candidate, the teacher Parcheveki, became the commissar of the Provisional Government. He unquestioningly carried out all the instructions of the Kronstadt Soviet. I tried to find any information about Parcheveki’s identity, but to no avail.

So, in 1917, the “Kronstadt Republic” was ruled by non-partisan “pincers”. Talking about the control of the Bolsheviks over Kronstadt in the 1917 year is a big stretch. Although after October 1917, their influence has increased significantly.

Here is a typical example. 1 May of that alarming year, the meeting of the personnel of the fort "Krasnaya Gorka" decided: "Lenin's tactics do not cause us sympathy, and we are not going to stop the fight against German imperialism." The fact is that the fort "Red Hill" was in the deepest rear. His guns never shot at the Germans, and will not shoot in the future. He was sitting in the “Red Hill” garrison in warm barracks, received a good ration and was ready to “continue the struggle against German imperialism” for many more years.

Similarly, when sailors at meetings decided whether to fight the Germans in the Irbensky Strait, opinions were divided: on battleships and cruisers they were all in favor, and on destroyers, gunboats, minesweepers and other small vessels - against. The decision was determined not by party affiliation, but by the draft of ships. Who did not allow the draft to pass the strait, they were, of course, "for", and on ships with a small draft, the sailors unanimously voted against.

Can such a fleet be considered combat-ready? As we see, the “victory” was stolen in the spring of 1917, and the Bolsheviks had nothing to do with it.

Well, until October 1917, Kronstadt was a kind of Zaporizhzhya Sich with sailor freemen instead of the Square Cossacks. Simply put, Kronstadt was independent of the territory of the Provisional Government and the Petrograd Soviet.

UNLIMITED VIOLENCE IN A QUIET PROVINCE

What happened in the rest of the former Russian Empire? Take for example the backwater - Tver province. There, until February 1917, everything was quiet and fine. February 28 Tver army radio station received a telegram about the riots in Petrograd. And the next day, in the garrison of Tver, which numbered over 20 thousand people, fermentation began. On March 2, several dozen workers with red flags moved into the barracks on the Zhelchakov field. The commander of the 196 Infantry Reserve Regiment, Major General Rutkovsky tried to stop them, but was seriously wounded by soldiers.

In Tver, the Cadets and the Zemstvo quickly created a local government that was subordinate to the Provisional Government - the Public Security Committee. It is located in the City Council. Alas, the Committee had no real power. Already 2 March in the city began the killings. For example, a young warrant officer, who demanded that soldiers give him honor, was brutally beaten and then thrown from the third floor of the building onto the pavement.

The committee sent a group of soldiers to arrest the governor N.G. Bunting They took him out into the street and began to shower him with insults. “What have I done wrong to you?” The governor tried to defend himself. “And what have you done to us good?” - answered some woman. And so, “for the inactivity” of Buying was beaten to death, and the disfigured corpse was dragged out and thrown into the square.

Committee members - cadet attorney A.A. Cherven-Vodali, member of the 4th State Duma, and Lieutenant Colonel G.V. Colonels - tried to protect the governor, but were brutally beaten by soldiers. Later, both of them were shot by the Bolsheviks. I note that the vice-governor and a number of other officials, having learned about the events in Petrograd, fled from Tver.

Practically throughout the Tver province, the revolutionary events of February-March of 1917 were accompanied by an increase in violence, cruelty, hooliganism, and crime. The source of anarchy, as a rule, were the soldiers.

So, 1 – 2 March the situation in Tver was uncontrollable. The actions of unorganized crowds of soldiers and workers were accompanied by pogroms and violence. The soldiers looted the house of the governor of Tver, N.G. von Buying, crushed the Tver prison and freed the prisoners. The prisoners, dressed in the form of officers, soldiers, students, high-school students, robbed the population, mocked all those who were considered "gentlemen".

The lower ranks of the 57, 196 and 232 infantry reserve regiments looted the bakery of the Morozovskaya factory. At the enterprises, the soldiers disarmed the sentries guarding the German and Austrian prisoners of war who were in the work.

The soldiers of the Torzhok garrison demanded that the military authorities release those who were in penalty companies and in the guardhouse. After fulfilling this requirement, they destroyed the city prison, from which all the criminals were released.

In Bezhetsk, crowds of soldiers crushed the prison, and in Vyshny Volochyok - the police department and the district council.

In the first half of March, 1917 in the Tver province appeared over three thousand deserters. On March 14, Lieutenant-General Pykhachev pointed out in a telegram that “deserters freed from responsibility, instead of returning to their units, allow themselves to attack civilians and terrorize them.”

A member of the Moscow Council of Soldiers' Deputies Shishilin, visiting the Tver garrison as an instructor in April 1917 of the year, came to the conclusion that “there are few conscious soldiers”.

In June 1917, the Provisional Government began preparations for an offensive on the front. 5 Jun. Kerensky signed an order to send full regiments from the rear garrisons. However, most of the soldiers from the reserve regiments did not want to go to the front. In this regard, even 29 April Prince S.V. Kudashev presented to the Minister of War A.I. Guchkov a memorandum with a plan for creating volunteer percussion units. They were given a large salary and pensions to families. Later, the new war minister, Alexander Kerensky, seized on this idea. June 13 issued Supreme Command Order No. 439 on the formation of revolutionary battalions from rear volunteers “with the aim of raising revolutionary inspiration and an offensive rush in the army”

Someone from the soldiers believed the chatter of Kerensky, who claimed that the Germans would not be able to resist the “revolutionary battalions” and would flee. Someone was seduced by money. As a result, in the Tver province several hundred people enrolled in these battalions.

Thus, the formation of the “death battalion” began in Tver. His goal was proclaimed "to campaign in the rear and at the front in favor of the offensive and, having formed, go to the front."

CIVIL WAR BEGINNED ALREADY IN MARCH

To maintain the power of the Provisional Government, Kerensky began to act on the principle of "divide and rule." He ordered the formation of "national units" - Polish, Czechoslovak, Ukrainian, etc., which, in his opinion, should suppress the revolutionary movement. Alexander Fedorovich turned out to be right - it was the national units that became the instigators of the civil war in Russia.

Thus, in Tver, too, they set about creating the “foreign legion” of Kerensky. In the 27 th infantry reserve brigade, which served about five thousand soldiers mobilized in the southeastern provinces, the Ukrainian National Regiment was formed. The Ukrainian "death squad" was formed in the 293 Infantry Reserve Regiment.

However, Kerensky’s plans to launch a large offensive aroused the anger and indignation of most of the soldiers of the garrisons of the Tver province. These sentiments were covered by the soldier mass, which was released on a demonstration in Tver 18 June. In the course of it, a soldier rushed at an officer of the 196 Infantry Reserve Regiment, who carried a flag with the inscription “Trust to the Provisional Government under the control of the Soviets”. The soldier was killed. Then several officers were killed.

Soldiers who did not want to be recorded in the "shock parts", engaged in robbery. In June, 1917, abusive searches and arrests, beating of officers, and the defeat of wine warehouses became the norm in the garrisons of Tver and Rzhev.

Not lagged behind the soldiers and peasants. Already in March-April, the estates were burning and sharing the land. The case of the peasants of the four villages of the Pervitinsky parish of the Tver district against the landowners of the Tails is curious. On April 7, a gathering of peasants from 200 sent a petition to the county Interim Executive Committee with a request to "send landowners from the limits of the volost for their commitment to serfdom and a crime before the revolution."

The detachments of soldiers, sent by the Provisional Government to the cities to maintain order, themselves became a source of atrocities and pogroms. For example, a detachment of soldiers from the 196 Infantry Reserve Regiment sent to Bezhetsk from Tver refused to maintain order in the city, looted the library of the city school, drank all the meth, intended for physical experiments.

The commander of the detachment, Ensign Nikolsky, stated that “he does not want to know anyone, he does not recognize any military ministers of Kerensky that he has his own Tver Republic, where he does what he wants.”

It was not better in other provinces. However, the wise Soviet, and now anti-Soviet professors-historians who have become anti-Soviet, are still dumb about the peaceful bloodless February revolution, the “lost victory”, that the Civil War began in the summer of 1918, etc.

In February – October, the Provisional Government in Petrograd was 1917, but there was virtually no centralized state. The closest analogue of Russia in February – October is the hetman’s rule in Little Russia in the second half of the 17th century. A hetman sat in Baturin, and in Mirgorod, Belaya Tserkov the power belonged to the colonels (field commanders), in the Sich - Cossacks-gorlopan, well, the capital city of Kiev was itself and was ruled by citizens and the metropolitan. But the hetman, having inflated his cheeks, conducted negotiations on behalf of the whole Little Russia with Moscow, Warsaw and Constantinople.

In my opinion, the Civil War began in March 1917. And in the course of it in Russia, by October 1917, many tens of thousands of people were killed, at least 90% of noble estates were burned, and almost all landowners' lands were divided. The provisional government never fully controlled the central provinces of Russia, and the outskirts did not obey Petrograd at all.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    12 February 2017 06: 57
    The author is right that * tiligent * figures lie and lie consciously about the February events. It has already become * a commonplace * by some kind of ritual, it is imperative to blame Bolsheviks for anything and, of course, IN AND LENIN. Moreover, the charges begin with * Jewish * origin and up to * sale * RUSSIA. And how many copyright fakes are launched? After all, this is strange, the authors of rumors and false * documents *, then they themselves announced their own authorship and were proud of it. It seems like they advertised themselves and their skills to the owners. But still * they believe * fakes and not documents. It seems that the figures of modern RUSSIA are ashamed of the fact that in 1917 nobles, churchmen, merchants and * tiligents * destroyed the RUSSIAN EMPIRE, but the Bolsheviks defended the land and created the SOVIET UNION.
    1. Cat
      +9
      12 February 2017 08: 37
      I will give an example of my small homeland, Serginsky and Ufaleysky factories of Krasnoufimsky volost.
      The events of February 1917 stopped everything, I emphasize all the factories of the Serginsko-Ufaleysky Partnership. The factory workers in the summer of 1917 switched to a subsidiary farm. Fortunately, there was an experience. In the 19th century, plants stood for 10 years. The next step is the requisition of land, mowing and pasture clear-sighted in June-July 1917, the owners try to return the old-timers with a pitchfork sideways. In addition, by the autumn of 1917, soldiers began to return, naturally with weapons. Quiet confrontation between the upper and lower classes continues until November. In November 1917, the lower classes unanimously supported the "soviets" for the promise to start up the plants.
  2. +13
    12 February 2017 07: 09
    Article plus! The author has indeed refuted the theses of the "bakers," smearing the Bolsheviks with blood and diarrhea, about the "great and bloodless" February revolution. By the way, the Bolsheviks were able to accumulate strength and unsuccessfully speak only by July 1917, having behind them the Kronstadt freemen.
    1. +1
      12 February 2017 11: 07
      Quote: V.ic
      Article plus!

      Article minus.
      1. +6
        12 February 2017 11: 19
        RUSS well this is an argument! laughing
        1. 0
          12 February 2017 11: 22
          Quote: Uncle Murzik
          RUSS well this is an argument! laughing

          This is a short post. tongue
    2. +1
      12 February 2017 11: 21
      Quote: V.ic
      The author did indeed refute the theses of the "bakers," smearing the Bolsheviks with blood and diarrhea, about the "great and bloodless" February revolution.

      The author writes what you want to hear and listen to, writes what is a win-win ride on this site, eat eat this "honey". Shirokorad also writes books, and you buy them! There is the same businessman, the historian Spitsin, who is also now engaged in public relations of his books on the Internet.
      1. +7
        12 February 2017 12: 29
        RUSS well, you as a "great" historian would have taken and written your article, in rebuttal! belay and then only verbiage is one lol
        1. +1
          12 February 2017 19: 12
          Quote: Uncle Murzik
          RUSS well, you as a "great" historian would have taken and written your article, in rebuttal! belay and then only verbiage is one lol

          Verbiage here and on TV
          The population does not believe the news and the media in general, and that's because of such authors!

          Russian citizens have less confidence in television. Meanwhile half compatriots are confident in the veracity of news from TV programs. These are data from a survey conducted by the Public Opinion Foundation.
          Russians have less confidence in the news that is shown on television, despite the fact that it is still the main news source.
      2. +3
        12 February 2017 12: 34
        and who's stopping you from writing a true article here?
        1. +4
          12 February 2017 12: 44
          after all, Alexander Shirokorad, an excellent truthful article, did it for me! good
          1. +2
            12 February 2017 12: 46
            Yes, I wrote to RUSS
      3. +3
        12 February 2017 12: 46
        You understand Svanidze nicer ...
        1. +1
          12 February 2017 18: 23
          Quote: Djuma-13
          You understand Svanidze nicer ...

          Unlike the scribbler and publicist Shirokorad, Svanidze the historian, he graduated from the History Department of Moscow State University. Until 2012, he was a member of the Commission to Combat Attempts to Falsify History to the detriment of Russia's interests; now he is a member of the Presidential Council for the Development of Civil Society and Human Rights.
          And who is Alexander Shirokorad?
          1. +5
            13 February 2017 06: 06
            Quote: RUSS
            Unlike scribbler and publicist Shirokorad, Svanidze historian

            Quote: RUSS
            And who is Alexander Shirokorad?

            You correctly noted: Shirokograd is a publicist with a not always reasoned base.
            That's just Svanidze, despite his education, is a small cheater and a juggler, which he successfully demonstrated to the whole country on TV.
            In this case, Shirokograd operates with numbers and specific facts. Are there any complaints about the numbers and facts?
            1. +1
              13 February 2017 06: 44
              dear Moore, what claims can RUSS make from him, and even from our Moldavian brother Olgovich, one verbiage!
            2. +1
              13 February 2017 11: 58
              Of course I have. Shirokorad zvizdun and juggles the facts, or simply does not know them.
          2. +4
            13 February 2017 07: 07
            You can finish anything, here it’s more difficult to become a person with a capital H, and doubly difficult to love your country. Also be called at least RUSSOM internally remain Russophobe.
            attempts to falsify history to the detriment of Russia's interests

            ... of course it's brilliant!
            And who is

            An example given by any historian who speaks at odds with the beliefs of this sofa Yksperd will be * an insufficient historian * * a sufficient merchant * or * who such *.
  3. +10
    12 February 2017 07: 13
    The God-chosen Russian people, the unbridled element of insane violence, the lack of goals and the slogan of robbing looted are shown quite well. How much effort has been put by the Communists to curb and ghost some element of this element, and then it will be put to them by vindication. Liberal politicians dignitaries did not understand this the top of the army, what will it lead to? Russian maybe? malicious intent? or the logical result of the existence of a weak feudal dependent backward torn apart by the contradictions of tsarist Russia. February 1917 is so similar to August 1991, the consequences are identical only in contrast to 1917 today in Russia there is no force capable of stopping and returning it Russia is on the path of independent development.
    1. +3
      12 February 2017 08: 23
      Quote: apro
      Didn’t liberal politicians understand this

      Did not understand. Just as many of those who danced with joy in 1991, or those who rode on the Maidan in 2014 did not understand. People generally do not like to learn the lessons of history, in particular the fact that there are no bloodless revolutions - and any only prologue to chaos and the almost inevitable civil war.
      1. +1
        12 February 2017 15: 36
        There is already, excuse me, but as Alexander Zinoviev wrote about such cases, there are two ways: either a meaningless, immoral, irresponsible existence without any hope of the future or a salvage assault with obvious victims. Revolutions occur when contradictions and problems accumulate that the government does not want to notice or solve, the development of the country and society rests against a wall that cannot be circumvented, but must be demolished. But for successful revolutions, ideas are needed, primarily of a positive social character, then they are not replaced by Maidan.
        1. +1
          12 February 2017 15: 42
          Quote: Rastas
          Revolutions occur when contradictions and problems accumulate that the government does not want to notice or solve, the development of the country and society rests against a wall that cannot be circumvented, but must be demolished. But for successful revolutions, ideas are needed, primarily of a positive social character, then they are not replaced by Maidan.

          The revolution is, first of all, the most complicated operation, which requires not some contradictions, but people with the necessary skills, major financial injections, and betrayal of some power elites. Problems and contradictions are everywhere and always will be, such is life and there is nothing to be done about it. But it is better to solve them in an evolutionary way, without war and devastation, for a long time, yes, dreary, but cheaper. And for money and for lives. As for the Maidan, there was a very simple idea - to spoil Russia. And this idea came true
          1. 0
            12 February 2017 16: 19
            Read carefully - contradictions that the government does not want to solve. Contradictions and problems come in different levels and dangers for the country. Evolution is wonderful, but if the government has no desire, then evolution will be poher. Tell me, in what leading countries in the world there were no revolutionary upheavals?
            1. +1
              12 February 2017 17: 10
              Quote: Rastas
              Read carefully - contradictions that the government does not want to solve.

              No contradictions will lead to a revolution unless specialists prepare it. The maximum that people are capable of is street riots that are easy to suppress. And then the question of price arises.
    2. +1
      12 February 2017 12: 35
      Quote: apro
      God-chosen Russian people are shown quite well, the unbridled element of insane violence,

      But do other nations not behave like that?
    3. +2
      12 February 2017 15: 16
      You are very excited about the lack of goals. Here you repeat the myths of the Russian intelligentsia about the meaningless and merciless rebellion. In fact, the same peasants knew perfectly well what they wanted. Say, they burned the estates with a rational goal - to get land, because the landowner and his family will clean up after the ruin of his estate, the "black redistribution" was a completely rational idea. They burned not all the estates, but those where there was more land and a lot of landless ones. The pogroms began closer to the summer of the 17th, when it became clear that the Social Revolutionaries, having developed a good law on the land, could not approve it.
      1. +1
        12 February 2017 15: 27
        I agree Rastas the peasants decided to grab the fellow countrymen and turn into bars themselves, but why did the soldiers and sailors officers and townsfolk let them into the expense? Does anarchy find the mother of order?
        1. +1
          12 February 2017 15: 45
          Not at all, not by any bars, the “black redistribution” wasn’t about that, so that the lords would appear again, only from peasants. Here, each community would be given an equal plot of land, and distribution would already occur within the community itself. No inequality. And the officers were shot, because in the first Russian revolution of 1905, many of them were engaged in punitive actions that they did not forget about, many executions were carried out by ordinary criminals, they were shot because of resistance, many were enemies for the revolution, not on their heads to iron.
          1. +2
            12 February 2017 21: 52
            Quote: Rastas
            And the officers were shot because in the first Russian revolution of 1905, many of them were engaged in punitive actions

            As I understand it, revolutionary sailors killed fleet officers because they were engaged in punitive actions in their Russian provinces on their ships? The results of the reprisals of sailors over officers of the Baltic Fleet during the February Revolution of 1917 / A.V. Panova // Extremism, Conflict, and War: History and Present: Proceedings of the International Conference. - Voronezh: VSTU, 2010.
    4. 0
      13 February 2017 10: 55
      And Bunin wondered: "Chud and Russia are fighting. Who will win? Where did he get out of?" etc
      low and noble and other opposites
  4. +10
    12 February 2017 08: 28
    In my opinion, the Civil War began in March 1917
    ... I support ...
  5. +5
    12 February 2017 08: 48
    In Pskov, it was more or less quiet.
    The soldiers of the automobile company, located in the Yenisei barracks, were the first to know about the overthrow of the tsarist autocracy. A company committee was elected in the company, which decided to arm the soldiers. The company commander went over to the side of the soldiers and gave the keys to the weapons warehouse. They put up guard on the Olginsky bridge across the Velikaya river and on Troitsky across the Pskov river, and armed patrols were sent to the streets of the city.
    The cars traveled around the factories and plants of Pskov, military units of the Pskov garrison. All the soldiers and workers of the city learned about the revolution in Petrograd.
    Soon it became known that Nicholas II abdicated the throne and signed the act of abdication in Pskov. On the morning of 3 on March 1917, at a rally near the station, this was announced to soldiers and railway workers, in the afternoon there was a rally on Torgovaya Square near the building of public places and a crowded demonstration under red banners. The demonstration also took place on 4 of March, at the head of which were more than 250 armed soldiers of the automobile company. Demonstrators released soldiers on guardhouse and political prisoners in a hard-labor prison.
    Thus, in Pskov, as in Petrograd, but in miniature, dual power was established: a Council was formed - a body of power for workers and soldiers (peasants in soldier's overcoats) and a Committee of public security - a body of power subordinate to the Provisional Government ...
    ... After the overthrow of the autocracy, like the working people of all Russia, the Pskovites hoped for a quick solution to socio-economic problems to improve their lives: workers stood for an 8-hour work day, peasants demanded land, soldiers demanded less discipline, an end to the war.

  6. +7
    12 February 2017 09: 45
    In my opinion, the Civil War began in March 1917. And in the course of it in Russia, by October 1917, many tens of thousands of people were killed, at least 90% of noble estates were burned, and almost all landowners' lands were divided. The provisional government never fully controlled the central provinces of Russia, and the outskirts did not obey Petrograd at all.

    Or maybe it began under Pugachev? Or Razine? Or under Spartak?
    The author likes to refer to contemporaries: WHERE evidence contemporaries about the "many tens of thousands of people killed" (as at the front) between February and October, except for his unhealthy fantasies?
    In Helsingfors, only 120 officers were killed, and the bulk were killed not by their own teams, but by crowds of obscure rabble staggering between the ships. Contemporaries speak of German agents — who shot Komflot and bribed rabble to kill officers in order to weaken the fleet, although the agitation of their accomplices to the Bolsheviks played a corrupting role.
    A contemporary historian Melgunov, investigated the issue of the victims of February and considered the revolution to be practically bloodless, and individual cases of violence were not widespread.
    The interim government never completely controlled the central provinces of Russia, and the outskirts were not subordinate to Petrograd at all.


    Nonsense is complete. Even the notebook separatists (under the USSR), Latvians and Estonians FULLY obeyed the VP (and did not ask for anything),
    -Finland, which requested autonomy in DOMESTIC AFFAIRS, was rejected even in this matter and submitted to the EP.
    -Ukraine-Nazi historians, for example, V. Savchenko (a great lover of Petlyura and Grushevsky), would say better in Ukraine themselves:
    " Despite the self-declaration of autonomy of Ukraine, back in June 1917, this autonomy is actually still did not exist until the end of October 1917As real power in the so-called South-Western provinces of Russia held by the Provisional Government of the Russian Republic. "
    Yes, and the decrees of owls. Let the author read the authorities, where she curses the EaP for not giving independence to the Ruin.
    -Muslim congresses made decisions on cultural and national autonomy (education, culture, care, literature, etc.)
    Congress of Siberian provinces in Tomsk confirmed unity of Russia, accepting only those rights that will be given to her by the Constitution of Russia.

    And here is what a certain Ulyanov wrote: "Russia is now the freest country in the world, there is no violence against the masses and, finally, the masses trust the VP

    Need to study their leaders, comrade author.
    1. +3
      12 February 2017 10: 38
      Quote: Olgovich
      Contemporaries are talking about German agents / 1 /-and shooting at Komflot and bribing rabble to kill officers in order to weaken the fleet, although agitation their accomplices of the Bolsheviks / 2 / played a corrupting role.

      At 3,14sano it is very transparent, you would not be too lazy and would immediately declare that the "first" and were "second", and would immediately refute the author ... laughing
      1. +4
        12 February 2017 12: 10
        [quote = V.ic] Na3,14sano[/ Quote]
        Smells bad, don’t you? But this is a comment on a respected VO.
        1. +2
          12 February 2017 15: 38
          Quote: Olgovich
          Quote: V.ic
          Na3,14sano

          Smells bad, don’t you? But this is a comment on a respected VO.

          This is an assessment of your comment ... unfortunately it cannot have the aromas of Kazanlak roses ... But as a matter of fact my objection, as always, cannot be answered? Perfume "forever"!?!?
    2. +4
      12 February 2017 10: 40
      Quote: Olgovich
      Need to study their leaders, comrade author.


      Comrade the author does not bother to study historical sources, he convincingly demonstrated this in his several recent publications ....
      There you can find such blunders that you wonder, but the author does not bother, judges everything and sweepingly, sometimes not choosing expressions, from the figures of monarchs, the civil war to the defense of Leningrad ...
      According to a well-known law, the number of publications turned into quality, far from the best ...
      Biting and unproven - his corporate identity ...
      1. +3
        12 February 2017 11: 06
        Quote: ranger
        There are such bloopers that you wonder, but this does not bother the author

        Because the author has a mediocre attitude to history. Shirokorad apparently uses the Internet and seeing how it is now fashionable to be a Stalinist, or even the Bolsheviks and others are now in fashion, so on this wave and writes his pseudo-historical opuses, it is gratifying that such people are not allowed to shoot guns, for example, for compiling textbooks on the history of Russia.
        1. +8
          12 February 2017 11: 24
          It’s very funny to look at the hysteria of the bakers! wassat waiting for their favorite argument "it's all communist propaganda" lol
          1. +4
            12 February 2017 15: 03
            Quote: Uncle Murzik
            It’s very funny to look at the hysteria of the bakers!

            I said earlier, I repeat again ...
            French roll is a baguette. When he is just out of the stove, you bite him and he crunches very nicely. And you Hawai crackers camp .....
    3. +3
      12 February 2017 12: 44
      It is curious how all of them obeyed the EaP when there was a parallel power structure. TIPS? The EaPs promised everyone autonomy at almost the confederal level; it was not in vain that units based on nationality began to be created in the army.
      Well, Comrade Lenin could write anything because of the "hillock", in fact the VP had no power and one consolidated company was overthrown
    4. +6
      12 February 2017 15: 00
      Contemporaries speak of German agents and shooters at Komflot and bribed rabble to kill officers in order to weaken the fleet,
      ...Those. German agents lurked until February, and immediately after February, they took money out of the capsule, bribed rabble and rabble went to shoot officers to weaken the fleet .. Thus, a conclusion suggests itself .. the February revolution was the work of German agents ... It was they who organized strikes created a collapse on the railway ... stopping food supplies to Moscow and Petrograd, and Timofey Kirpichnikov was the first soldier to raise weapons against the tsarist regime, as the Provisional Government called it, a German agent.? And General Kornilov, who handed him to George, all the more? .. And is there the name of at least one agent detained by Russian counterintelligence ... before the arrival of V.I. Lenin ... the most famous German agent?
      1. +4
        12 February 2017 20: 46
        Quote: parusnik
        ..Those. German agents lurked until February, and immediately after February they took money out of the capsule, bribed rabble, and rabble went to shoot officers in order to weaken the fleet


        They lurked, as it should be for agents, before and after February and worked successfully. You are not in the know? Use the troubles to solve their military goals, create this troubles with the enemy, destroy the commanders, the main goal of the agents (see June 1941). You don't know that either?
        Without them, most likely, such victims among the fleet command would not have happened. I repeat what eyewitnesses said: an unknown rabble walked between the ships and demanded the extradition of officers. Not all teams gave their own.
        Quote: parusnik
        Thus, the conclusion suggests itself .. the February revolution is the work of German agents.

        Primitively. But they, too, of course.
        Quote: parusnik
        It was they who organized strikes, created a collapse on the railway ... stopping food supplies to Moscow and Petrograd

        Yeah, tell me the Apocalypse: there were severe drifts on the railway and small interruptions, there was no famine.
        1. +2
          13 February 2017 06: 57
          Olgovich you urgently need to look for German spies in the royal village, among the German dynasty Holstein-Gottorpov supposedly the Romanovs! lol
        2. +3
          13 February 2017 09: 06
          Those who called for the overthrow of the monarchy in the Duma .. such as Kerensky .. this is a German agent .. The empress in her letters to the sovereign well, very indignant .. his behavior ..
          Yeah, tell me the Apocalypse: there were strong drifts on the railway and small interruptions, there was no famine.
          ... and the demonstrations were from overeating cakes by the working class ... they demanded bread ... Transparencies were written apparently by German agents.
          .destroy commanders - the main goal of agents
          ... And the emperor’s refusal of support by almost all generals .. Is this part of the German conspiracy ...?
          Primitively. But them too, of course.
          ..So, the conclusion from your post is Alexander Olgovich ...
  7. +16
    12 February 2017 10: 10
    Dear Alexander, thanks for the article. Readers ponder the loss figures that the author cited. Why are there such troubles in Russia connected with the independence and collapse of the country? Our ancestors and we are given some dashing times. And everything is connected with the softness of the Head of State. Nicholas II climbed into the war, which promised nothing to the country. Abdicated, civil war broke out. Tagged and Alkash gave freedom of self-determination. Not only did they ruin the country once again, but they allowed the bastards to even attack officers in the subway. And that was in the 90s. There were such rallies as in the square in Kronstadt. These two types complied with Washington's instructions, as in 1914, 1917. A country requires order and a decent life for its population. After all, we have such opportunities.
    On February 9, at the ICAO meeting in Moscow, I was awarded the International Prize for the "Creation and Development of Air Navigation Systems". Yes, I have dedicated it all my life. Today, airplanes and the navy use these systems that I created and under my leadership not only to protect the country, but also to live peacefully. Really, thanks to someone we will destroy everything. And then create again. Many enterprises created under my leadership have been liquidated. Only in Ukraine, 12 enterprises of the former USSR Ministry of Radio Industry were closed, which were once subordinate to me. And this is 435 billion dollars. US value of fixed assets. There now, US officials are trying to produce gas. Closed enterprises in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus. I have the honor.
    1. Cat
      +5
      12 February 2017 13: 57
      Yuri Grigoryevich, many of us understand your longing and grief when the long-suffering for decades decays in an instant. Do not take to heart! Yes, it’s bitter to realize that because of the “fools ..... ka” at the top, a mighty power appeared on the edge of propato twice. In the seventeenth, could not resist and fell into the abyss of civil fratricidal war. In the nineties, they went along the edge of the abyss, singeing the soul and heart of two Chechen companies. In both cases, a large country was losing territory and people, but even now, in spite of adversity, we remain the largest country in the world, in which more than 180 nationalities live. The last trouble happened before our eyes and we remember and will not allow the repetition of the "script". Our "partners" understand this and are furious, they are already spraying with saliva. Choke. And your work - the service is more true, will describe the work of all those who put their mind, hands and heart on the block of defense of the Fatherland, and not rarely life - will always be with us! We will not forget, we remember!
      Sincerely, Kotische is from all who care. I have the honor!
  8. +12
    12 February 2017 13: 08
    In principle, the facts presented in the article are known to everyone who is interested in this important topic. But given the 30-year brainwashing, which reached the very absurd theses such as “The Tsar was overthrown by the Bolsheviks, a repetition of these elementary facts would be useful.
    Speaking about the essence of events, it must be said that in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century two were prepared at once opposite in terms of meaning, and revolutions that are hostile to each other. - The bourgeois revolution of the "upper" dismantles the archaic and unnecessary more absolute monarchy with its estate system and the conditionally socialist, or rather, the lower people's revolution, associated primarily with the transfer of land to the peasants.
    It was the struggle of these two revolutions that became the essence of the civil war, and the mutual hatred of the "elite" and "cattle" reached the level of religious fanaticism on both sides, it’s enough to read the Cursed Days by Bunin with his endless curses against the rebellious people and the desperate desire for foreign occupation which will help the "gentlemen" to again drive the people into a stall.
    In addition to these two main forces, the agents of the civil war complicating the overall picture were the numerous nationalists of the outskirts of the Republic of Ingushetia (at the same time of different orientations), the foreign imperialists, who were also mutually hostile, and finally, the forces of the “Russian rebellion” who received a free-will and a criminal world that were hostile to any state under conditions collapse of the state complete freedom of action.
    1. +4
      12 February 2017 15: 25
      Fans of tsarist Russia are very fond of invoking Bunin's “Cursed Days”. True, most of them did not read this book, and if they did, they themselves compromised themselves, because the book calls on the Germans to restore order, destroy the Bolsheviks, and drive the Russian people back to the stall, where it belongs. Bunin calls ordinary people atavistic individuals, ugly faces. This is called social racism, so you should not scold ordinary men who ruined the intelligentsia, they deserve it. A disgusting impression of the position of a good writer, he could not stand above events, like, say, A. Blok. The only thing to justify Bunin is his words said in 1934 that the revolution of the 17th can be impartially judged after 100 years.
      1. +2
        12 February 2017 16: 12
        Can you give at least one link of tsarist Russia lovers to Bunin? and who needs the excuses of Bunin himself?
        ....... do not blame ordinary men who ruined the intelligentsia, they deserve it. No ordinary men destroyed the intelligentsia, this did not happen, and could not be. All the intelligentsia was destroyed by the Bolsheviks, they understood that they could not do anything except chatter, and they understood what such chatter could lead to (chaos, unrest, incitement, etc.). )
        About Blok, too, it is not clear what kind of events he stood up to.
        1. +3
          12 February 2017 16: 21
          "Intelligentsia and revolution" read, then you will understand. And Bunin is constantly referenced by the main gentleman in Russia Mikhalkov.
          1. +5
            12 February 2017 17: 35
            Blok died in madness, with him Lucifer took the place of Christ, and you advise me to read him.
            1. +1
              12 February 2017 19: 06
              Quote: bober1982
              Blok died in madness, with him Lucifer took the place of Christ, and you advise me to read him.

              Wisely. As the Caliph Omar used to say, if these books say what is in the Qur'an, then they are useless. If they say something else, then they are harmful. Therefore, in both cases they must be burned.
              As for Blok, there was a cleaner story: he worshiped not Lucifer, but Azazel and all four horsemen of the Apocalypse were behind him.
              1. +2
                12 February 2017 19: 35
                Then he (Block) demanded that the revolutionary authorities destroy all temples and monasteries, then broke furniture in his house Black Block music, rubric "Demonism and society", published on March 21.03.2005, XNUMX.
                This is apparently what you called Azazel worship.
                1. +1
                  12 February 2017 19: 58
                  Quote: bober1982
                  then broke furniture in his house

                  I listened to him once: well, for the time being I spoke of the Assyrians and Babylonians - nothing yet, but as I got to Alexander the Great, I can’t tell you what happened to him. I thought the fire, by golly! I ran away from the pulpit and, that there is strength, grab a chair on the floor. It, of course, is Alexander the Great, but why break chairs?
                  However, Griboedov, too, do not need to read-the inveterate was Zoroastrian
                  1. 0
                    12 February 2017 20: 05
                    However, Griboedov also does not need to be read ...
                    I completely agree on what he (Griboedov) gave up, let the aesthetes read.
      2. +3
        12 February 2017 19: 46
        Quote: Rastas
        for in the book there is a call to the Germans to restore order, destroy the Bolsheviks, drive the Russian people back to the stall, where it belongs. Bunin calls ordinary people atavistic individuals, ugly faces.

        This, in fact, is the essence of the White Guard project, and they implemented it in practice. Specifically, I cited Bunin as an example only because in his diaries he spoke directly and bluntly.
        Quote: Rastas
        therefore, do not blame ordinary men who ruined the intelligentsia,

        Well, specifically, they didn’t destroy the intelligentsia, they destroyed all the bar, “gentlemen” in the broad sense of the word. Most intellectuals were simply devoted to the ideals of the bourgeois revolution and therefore they “loved” the people when it was necessary to fight the “cursed tsarism” when the deed was done and the people began to claim the right to power, they hated it as a "rebellious boor".
        Quote: Rastas
        Fans of tsarist Russia love to cite Bunin's “Cursed Days”

        True, only need to be clarified. The fans of tsarist Russia are divided into three categories
        1) Frankly crazy: shell-shocked by the collapse of the USSR and subsequent impoverishment with the collapse of communist ideals. As a result of this and a general archaization of consciousness, a wide variety of cults and sects have blossomed from the Rodnovers to the Fomenkovites from the PGM-ty to the Seventh-day Adventists. Of course, the oligarchic authorities of the Russian Federation are happy to support them all.
        2) True monarchists. There are very few of them (I haven’t met a single one on our website), but they still remain. These are just the Bunins who do not stand up to the spirit (like Jude Nikolai 2) and Cursed Days are not quoted.
        3) And finally, the most powerful group is the bourgeois anti-Soviets of various stripes (from agents of the State Department to the chicks of Putin’s nest) for whom tsarist Russia is just material for creating an anti-Soviet myth — they themselves are not monarchists, moreover, they are completely hostile to them. They are, by and large, in a drum to mourn whether the “martyr king” or the “innocent victims of Stalin’s repressions” (that is, those who shot the “martyr king”). The main thing is against socialism. These are just the Cursed Days that quote and admire Bunin. "Barin" Mikhalkov whom you mention, just from this group.
        1. +2
          12 February 2017 20: 01
          You did not mention the fourth group of monarchists — English spies.
  9. +4
    12 February 2017 15: 06
    "Kerensky began to act on the principle of" divide and conquer. "He ordered the formation of" national units "- Polish, Czechoslovak, Ukrainian, etc., which, in his opinion, should suppress the revolutionary movement."

    Shirokorad again tupit - national units, incl. Polish and Czechoslovak, as well as Latvian, were created long before Kerensky, even under the tsar-priest.
  10. +6
    13 February 2017 06: 27
    Quote: apro
    God-chosen Russian people are shown quite well

    Generally speaking, it’s customary to call a “slightly different people” smile
    And our people - the “God-bearer”, something like that ... And if we give the “God-bearer” the will, he heaps ...
    I remember 1991, autumn. We are standing in a field position (three Topol APUs, PKP, a bunch of soldiers, ammunition, etc.). A clown in Moscow comes from a neighboring village with two of the same - one (one) of them is female.
    They demand to call the “main” - they were naturally not allowed to go further than the checkpoints - and they transmit an ultimatum to our commando: either at 24 o’clock we get out of their beloved countryman, or they will show us. They. Us.
    Our wise commando, alcoholized with a good-quality awl, the commando did not wake the dashing. I did not send them there on foot on an erotic journey, knowing that in a couple of days we would leave from there. Negotiated by the difficulty of coordinating the issue with Moscow, etc. After a couple of days, we left, and the clowns, if alive, still probably think that they drove off thermonuclear death ...
    That's what I mean ... Their faces were the same as, I believe, among those who suddenly felt their power over unhappy officers and the governor - crazy from permissiveness and exalted from joining the great. hi
  11. +5
    13 February 2017 09: 18
    I’m adding an article to the author and I want to deposit my 50 cents. As if this was not unpleasant for those who today are looking for any ways to maximize the Bolsheviks and the CCCP, but the version of the "Bolsheviks stole victory from Russia" is refuted by the facts of the state of the Russian army for the period from February to October 1917. I will not now swing the numbers torn hastily from the Internet about the number of deserters, the state of fronts, leapfrog in the change of command, etc. Volumes have been written about this, there are archives, there are documents - he who wants to hear and understand. I would just like to focus on the document, which the author did not mention: Order No.1 of 01 of March 1917 of the year, which in fact legitimized the bacchanalia and collapse that prevailed in the army and navy at that time. Explain to me how it is possible in the Belligerent country, in the Belligerent army to officially abolish the principle of unity of command, on which the very existence of the army, as a combat unit, is based? !! Of course, one can argue: the brainwave of the army and navy began earlier, BUT - before the appearance of this document, all the outrages were unauthorized, and somehow fell under the category of war crimes. Order No. 1, by its appearance, gave the go-ahead for permissiveness in the complete absence of possible responsibility for what was done. By and large, the SAMA power deprived itself of control over the army, passing it into the hands of the MOST army, again depriving the command staff of this same army of all levers of influence on subordinates. With the advent of Order No. 1, the Russian army turned from a combat unit into a regular armed crowd with all the consequences. And this happened with the blessing of the Provisional Government. Explain how, on the one hand, you can call for war to a victorious end, and on the other, how to add: "Well, you decide whether to fight or not." So who disarmed Russia, who stole her victory? Involuntarily recalls Bulgakov and his "White Guard":
    “I,” Turbin suddenly thumped, jerking his cheek, “unfortunately not a socialist, but ... a monarchist. And I even have to say I can’t bear the word“ socialist. ”And of all socialists, I hate Alexander Fedorovich Kerensky most of all ... .The eyes of the colonel instantly popped up on his face and some sparkle and sparkle flickered in them. He waved his hand, as if wishing to politely close his mouth to Turbin, and spoke:
    - It is sad. Um ... very sad ... The gains of the revolution and so on ... I have an order from above: to avoid staffing with monarchical elements, in view of the fact that the population ... is necessary, you see, restraint. In addition, the hetman, with whom we are in close and close contact, as you know ... sad ... sad ...
    The colonel’s voice not only did not express any sadness, but, on the contrary, sounded very joyful and his eyes were in complete contradiction with what he was saying. "