Analysis of recent events in Ukraine by Evgeny Satanovsky

33
Analysis of recent events in Ukraine President of the Institute of the Middle East Yevgeny Satanovsky.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    10 February 2017 19: 18
    Five plus Yevgeny Armagedonovich good
    1. 0
      12 February 2017 05: 03
      Quote: Dym71
      Five plus Yevgeny Armagedonovich good


      Yeah, ten!
      In the deputies probably marks ...
      1. +3
        12 February 2017 14: 49
        Quote: Alikos
        Yeah, ten!

        To whom, as it is more convenient, I'm just used to the Soviet five-point grading system smile
        Quote: Alikos
        In the deputies probably marks ...

        Yeah, for the presidency ... fellow
  2. +1
    10 February 2017 20: 12
    own land where you can stick a bayonet in the ground. Take, recognized "partners", and live. Under international law
  3. +6
    10 February 2017 20: 38
    Why doesn't nick listen to him
    1. 0
      12 February 2017 05: 04
      Quote: semenov3005
      Why doesn't nick listen to him


      Did you hear a joke about Elusive Joe?
      1. +1
        12 February 2017 10: 48
        Quote: Alikos
        Did you hear a joke about Elusive Joe?

        Have you heard about Trump? Now he’ll scroll on TV, gain popularity and become a politician. And the people will be tired of coping and will choose. And the more terrorist Bandera bombs will burst from us, the quicker they will choose.
        Everybody neighs and gets sick from America. But people here can smell out that you can choose anyone.
        1. +3
          12 February 2017 11: 00
          Quote: Barkhan
          Everybody neighs and grows fierce from America. But people here can smell out that you can choose anyone

          - Do you still confidently believe that Trump in America was chosen by the people?
          - I will disappoint you, probably: any so-called "democratic elections" on a scale ofоMore than the election of the collective farm chairman, there is a strictly controlled and controlled process.
          - the outcome of such elections depends on which of the candidates (read - the teams) has more resources, PR managers are better ... well, and much more
          - and only from the so-called. "people" does not depend on anything. Because "people" is a crowd, and a crowd is a herd. And the herd is always controllable request
          1. +2
            12 February 2017 11: 55
            Hello hi
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            - Do you still confidently believe that Trump in America was chosen by the people?

            Yes, I believe that the American people have become a decisive factor in choosing Trump. The whole state apparatus, huge capital, almost all the media ... and such a wrecker worked for Hillary.
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            - I will disappoint you, probably: any so-called "democratic elections" on a scale larger than the election of the collective farm chairman are a strictly controlled and controlled process

            Any passenger airplane pilot believes that he controls the ship 100% ... but only until the passengers run around the cabin ...
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            - the outcome of such elections depends on which of the candidates (read - the teams) has more resources, PR managers are better ... well, and much more

            Again, the situation with Trump and Clinton. And add rating agencies with support for the entire "democratic world."
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            - and only from the so-called. "people" does not depend on anything. Because "people" is a crowd, and a crowd is a herd. And the herd is always controllable

            It is possible that the herd, and that managed ... But the shepherds are not always aware of where the herd will ultimately tax. The whole story consists of such examples. Humanity is a seething cauldron.
            1. +3
              12 February 2017 12: 15
              Quote: Barkhan
              Yes, I believe that the American people have become a decisive factor in choosing Trump

              - no, well, pepper is clear - democracy is good

              Quote: Barkhan
              The entire apparatus of the state worked for Hillary, huge capital, almost all media

              - and the "apparatus" - not all ...
              - and the capital for Trump as if not more than for Clinton
              - about the media ... mdya ... but "practically" is not all the same?

              Quote: Barkhan
              ... the shepherds are not always aware of where the herd will ultimately tax out ...

              - Do they need it, to know? The herd will drive to where the shepherds need Yes

              Quote: Barkhan
              Humanity is a boiling cauldron

              - but there are also those in it who regulate the temperature in this boiler ... and others, um, "drilling parameters"

              In short, I understand you, IMHO.

              "Blessed is he who believes, it is warm to him in the world" (c) A, C, Griboedov wink
              1. 0
                12 February 2017 12: 35
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                - but there are also those in it who regulate the temperature in this boiler ... and others, um, "drilling parameters"

                There are such people. Only they, so to speak, according to my religious convictions, are not people. Well, but the so-called "earthly rulers" are only pawns in the wrong hands. Everything that people do not create turns into dust and memories.
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                In short, I understand you, IMHO.

                Of course, you and I are adults, with experience in life and an established worldview. Each will remain with his own opinion.
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                "Blessed is he who believes, it is warm to him in the world" (c) A, C, Griboedov

                Yes, I agree with him. And I sincerely pity unbelievers.
                1. +2
                  15 February 2017 04: 14
                  I will remind you to enable your logic in the operating mode.
                  The FBI revealed about Clinton that which it never revealed. so not everyone in the government supported Clinton.
                  actually when choosing from shit and shit it doesn't matter what they choose.
                  eg. clinton would shorten the handles, trumps will increase the handles.
                  in short, US policy does not depend on a monkey sitting in a white house. it became clear to me after Reagan.
                  I hope when you can understand what kind of choice a mouse has between a cat, a vaska, a cat, a saffron, and a cat, a murzik.
                  wish you learn to think and not repeat the slogans of various media.
              2. +1
                15 February 2017 09: 44
                - Do you still confidently believe that Trump in America was chosen by the people?
                - I will disappoint you, probably: any so-called "democratic elections" on a scale larger than the election of the collective farm chairman are a strictly controlled and controlled process
                - the outcome of such elections depends on which of the candidates (read - the teams) has more resources, PR managers are better ... well, and much more


                add - Trump was supported by the military, and this is perhaps stronger than the "American people". The SHA military lobby is everything ... supplying almost the entire world with its military "toys" is one of the few industries where Americans have no dangerous competitors. Even Ukraine is now trying to replace Kalashnikov with the M16 and become another “made in USA” weapon consumer. I think the CIA also provided some support to Trump, but the fact that he is not white and fluffy and does not change much in relations with Russia, in my opinion it is becoming apparent right now, his policy will be more predictable, but no more. I repeat - he is a much more dangerous opponent than Clinton - smarter and more cunning ... hi
          2. +1
            15 February 2017 04: 16
            Cat Man Null. respect you. few people can think independently. the vast majority are repelled by the false postulates of the media, creating logically dead-end thoughts.
  4. +6
    11 February 2017 08: 16
    Solovyov’s best: declare the successors of Ukraine DNRLR; withdraw recognition from Kiev; demand from Germany and France the implementation of the Minsk agreements.
    1. +1
      15 February 2017 04: 25
      I agree, but it is also necessary to destroy artillery points. I would combine these solutions.
      The Minsk agreements were needed by the West in order to maintain the current power. These agreements have fulfilled their task and the West is no longer interested. so you can demand but to no purpose.
      and it means there is no point in observing LDNR either, since Kiev has not complied with for a long time.
      It's time to adequately respond to the shelling.
      1. 0
        15 February 2017 22: 41
        absolutely, put, if necessary, for this modern complexes and equipment for the fight against electronics, etc. The club and diplomacy are better than under-diplomacy, when even the flag at the embassy cannot be hung up so as not to provoke.
  5. +8
    11 February 2017 09: 11
    As for the Americans and Israelis, Satanovsky said absolutely correctly regarding actions to ensure his security. And the question is why we cannot act as well, the answer is simple. Because in these countries, the elite does not keep their capital at the cordon, and we have it very often. Our "elite" feels like temporary workers, who are working in Russia, in order to flush to the West. The main slogan: Cut the cabbage and rinse off.
    But why artillery guns in the Donbass are not detected and not immediately destroyed is a question.
    1. +3
      11 February 2017 13: 09
      very true remark. mother’s fathers tell us about love for the motherland and Putin, and children and grandchildren abroad. where is the FSB looking? how can such people be trusted? Conflict of interest on the face. I want to swear. although a different race is formed that we live in a matrix. visibility is one and reality is different. hi
    2. 0
      11 February 2017 13: 14
      And the answer in your words written in the line above, as it were, was not, and the system has been common for many years. And it's easier to say - everyone is tied.
    3. +2
      15 February 2017 04: 31
      I will open the answer LYSOV. our top keeping a little money in the west wants to look beautiful in the eyes of the west (so that the accounts are not arrested). therefore, does not allow LDNR to destroy the artillery of the Armed Forces.
    4. 0
      12 March 2017 14: 59
      Everything is simpler. The Western World is already captured by the children of Zion, and Russia is still half
  6. +2
    11 February 2017 09: 55
    Unfortunately, the republics are not capable of much. Mostly words, but there is no deed.
    1. +1
      15 February 2017 04: 34
      so ktozh will allow them to do things. It is clear that the republics are dependent on Russia. that's why they are obedient. and no business.
  7. +1
    14 February 2017 12: 01
    Cool, cool Satanovsky.
  8. +2
    14 February 2017 21: 58
    Satanovsky is not cool, but rather cynical. But now all such a world politics. What he proposes is quite realistic if we had not had brakes in the government. In addition, there is a very strong oligarchic environment with huge resources. They seem to be removed from power, but this is purely arbitrary. And the recent elections have demonstrated this. Because three years and hollow guns and missiles in the Donbass. It would be a political will for a long time all turned into scrap with the help of Voentorg and the North Wind. To do this, you do not need to step on the adversary and violate Minsk once, two three, four .... You just need to destroy all the firing large-caliber iron.
    1. 0
      15 February 2017 04: 37
      Well, everything is impossible to destroy. NATO and Allied reserves are unlimited.
      but it is necessary to destroy systematically. and with the help of reconnaissance from space, accidentally get into front-line warehouses.
    2. +1
      13 March 2017 08: 28
      Satanovsky is not cool, but moderately cynical

      Realistic, informed, the arguments are always relevant and objective.
  9. 0
    15 February 2017 14: 47
    He would throw five kilograms to Zhenya! well done
    1. +1
      13 March 2017 08: 27
      He would throw five kilograms to Zhenya!
      Will not work. Genetics. metabolic syndrome and the rest of the bouquet is concomitant.
      I can’t read the article. There is a title, but no text. Why? I always listen with satisfaction to Satanovsky on talk shows, respect.
  10. 0
    15 February 2017 16: 43
    I have kosher tears of emotion come out when I watch our central television channels and listen to the radio station to lead fm.)))
  11. +1
    13 March 2017 08: 25
    I opened the article. There is a title, but no text. Question to administrators, it happens or is it just on my working computer?
  12. 0
    7 November 2017 13: 35
    [b] [/ b] Armageddonitch - SUPER ...