Russian flamethrower: from the beginnings to the present day

28
A flamethrower is one of the most demoralizing weapons on the battlefield. It is a mistake to assume that the German troops invented it first. This opinion came from the fact that it was Germany that first used flamethrowers during the hostilities of the First World War, but Russian military equipment had long been developing its apparatus. The events described took place in 1915-1916, but the prototype of the flamethrower appeared much earlier: the first mentions of such a tool date back to about the VII century. It was then called "Greek fire."





Initially, Greek fire was used in naval battles. In 673 and 717–718, the Arab fleet was burned with its help, 872 Cretan ships were destroyed in 20, and in 882 the fire-burning Byzantine ships (Helandria) again defeated the Arab the fleet. Since then, the design of flamethrowers has been improved for centuries, and mortality has increased tenfold.

Russian flamethrower: from the beginnings to the present day


It is believed that for the first time in a mass order flamethrowers were used by the 30.07.1915 fritz. against the British infantry. However, it was only a distant likeness of flamethrowers. In 1915-1916 in Russia, flamethrowers were also designed. In September 1915 was tested by knapsack flamethrowers of Professor Gorbov, in 1916 the army received the Tarnitsky flamethrower. Already in the autumn of 1916, the flamethrower teams of the Russian army were equipped with a Tobarnitsky flamethrower.



A little later, Strandin, Povarnin and the Capital created a high-explosive flamethrower (SPS-flamethrower). The range of such a tool was 35-50 meters.

However, the first prototype of the Soviet ROX-1 backpack flamethrower was created already after 24 of the year, in 1940 of the year. Cylinders with a combustible mixture were attached to the knapsack, and the flamethrowing gun itself resembled an ordinary gun. The Soviet model of the flamethrower was introduced into the combat mode later than the German one only because it was sent for revision, as a result of which the volume of flammable liquid and limiting flame throwing increased in the subsequent ROKS-3 model.



Throughout the Second World War, thanks to flamethrowers, many enemy forces were destroyed. Only according to approximate calculations of historians: manpower - 34 people, Tanks, self-propelled guns, armored personnel carriers - 120, bunkers, bunkers and other firing points - 3000, vehicles - 145. How powerful weapons become a flamethrower in our time?



Russia boasts developments that have virtually no analogues in the world. The "ancient" method of delivering a combustible mixture has sunk into oblivion. And if it was “overflowed” under pressure in flamethrowers of the military and post-war period, in 1970, Soviet gunsmith engineers created a fundamentally different weapon in their class: the rocket infantry flamethrower RPO “Lynx”.

After the transition to the new system, the main flagship of the Russian military-industrial complex was the rocket infantry flamethrower (RPO) "Bumblebee", which came to replace the flamethrower RPO "Rys". The Bumblebee, adopted by the chemical forces of the Soviet Army in 1988, was repeatedly improved and modernized, becoming one of the most powerful mobile guns to date.



At the moment, "Shmel-M" is in service (in different quantities) in flamethrowing units of the troops of radiation, chemical and biological protection, the marine infantry of Russia, special forces, in the armies of the CIS countries. Its last modification, Bumblebee-M, destroys all living things in volume to 80 m³, and its impact area is equal: in open areas - from 50 m², in confined spaces - to 80 m². The numbers are impressive, but in reality everything looks even more intimidating.



Tactical and technical indicators:
Caliber, mm: 90
Sighting range, m: 800
Capsule range, m: 1700
Weight of flamethrower, kg: 8,8
Mass of fire mixture in capsule, kg: 3,2
Length, mm: 940
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 February 2017 07: 22
    Forgot to write about an analogue from NPO basalt for infantry units.
    1. +1
      11 February 2017 10: 23
      It has no analogues in the world.
      1. 0
        12 February 2017 18: 04
        I hope it wasn’t sarcasm ... by the fact that Amer’s shells for m62 if my memory doesn’t change 3 times worse ...
  2. +2
    11 February 2017 08: 13
    It is claimed that:
    Initially, the flamethrower was planned not as an army, but as a police weapon for dispersing demonstrators. A good way to pacify demonstrators is to spray them with a fiery jet with a combustion temperature of 1000 degrees.


    A flamethrower is one of the most demoralizing weapons on the battlefield.

    I suppose that the demoralizing effect of modern jet flamethrowers has decreased. Although the efficiency has increased.

    At the beginning, flamethrowers were called "flamethrowers"
    Trophy flamethrower PMV.
  3. 0
    11 February 2017 08: 17
    Yes, and during the Second World War, the fascists quite a few hit our bunkers and bunkers together with people. Scary weapon!
    1. +3
      11 February 2017 08: 35
      Well, ours hit the same thing on the offensive
    2. 0
      12 February 2017 18: 06
      And you can also remember the flamethrower tanks ... by the way, our TOSIK ... and it came from them ...
  4. +6
    11 February 2017 08: 54
    The article is very interesting, but a blot
    Germany first used flamethrowers during the First World War, however, Soviet military equipment has long been developing its apparatus.

    where did Soviet technicians come from First world?
  5. +4
    11 February 2017 10: 08
    The author is a stupid person. article cal. where the hell .. en Soviet military equipment in the first world?
    1. +2
      11 February 2017 19: 56
      How from where. Russia is the birthplace of elephants.
  6. +5
    11 February 2017 12: 01
    Sorry author, but the article is some kind of confusion.
  7. 0
    11 February 2017 12: 10

    The most "charismatic" of flamethrowers in my opinion)
    1. 0
      13 February 2017 11: 09
      He's just the most poppy.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +2
    11 February 2017 13: 28
    It is believed that for the first time in large numbers flamethrowers were used by the Fritz on 30.07.1915/1915/1916. against the British infantry. In the years 1915-1916. flamethrower construction was also conducted in Russia. In September 1916, Professor Gorbov's knapsack flamethrowers were tested, in XNUMX the army received Tovarnitsky's flamethrower. Already in the autumn of XNUMX, Tovarnitsky’s flamethrower was equipped with flamethrower teams of the Russian army.

    The German Richard Fiedler patented his knapsack flamethrower in 1901. Already in 1909, his devices arrived to equip the sapper units of Germany at the same time “long and tedious” was tested in Russia, they decided not to purchase the devices, “for now, monitor the results of experiments on them abroad” - they were traced to the first combat use in 1915.
    However, it was only a distant semblance of flamethrowers.

    What are you saying :))
    Patent for invention:
    https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetail
    s / originalDocument? CC = DE & NR = 134348C & KC = C &
    & amp;
    & amp;
    amp; FT = D & date = & DB = EPODOC & locale = en_EP
    Description of the sample adopted for service: “Kleine Flammenwerfer” includes carrying devices, a container for flammable liquid and a cylinder for compressed gas. A working gas pressure of 23 atmospheres ensures the defeat of the enemy at a distance of up to 22 m. A notable feature of the weapon is the ability to connect two units in the Double Kleif with a jet range increased to 35-40 m and a duration of about 22 s. The weight of the equipped flamethrower "Kleif" is 33,5 kg.
    Photo "hero of the occasion":
  10. +1
    11 February 2017 14: 28
    French film with Philippe Noire "The Old Gun" - scary shots burning the family, and then the Germans !!!
    1. 0
      12 February 2017 15: 16
      One of the best films for revenge. Great movie!
  11. +3
    11 February 2017 16: 05
    oh, these journalists ... in the video (5 minutes 6 seconds) it’s clear that the mess is still without a tower before the shot, and this one scratches: “The tower was ripped off by shoulder with a shot”. why such sloppy productions?
    1. 0
      12 February 2017 18: 09
      Yeah, too. But damn sorry the result of volley fire was cut ... I think the mess thoroughly roasted ...
  12. +1
    11 February 2017 18: 24
    The headline is loud, just where is the flamethrower history?
    1. +1
      13 February 2017 15: 39
      Quote: Fenia04
      The headline is loud, just where is the flamethrower history?

      Yes, in several paragraphs the author ran from the Greek fire to the jet flame throwers.

      Interestingly, the author is aware of the LPO-50 Light Infantry Flamethrower?
      1. 0
        15 February 2017 19: 05
        Quote: Mister X
        Yes, in several paragraphs the author ran from the Greek fire to the jet flame throwers.
        Interestingly, the author is aware of the LPO-50 Light Infantry Flamethrower?


        Or "FOG" high-explosive flamethrower, as well as heavy "TPO-50". Somehow the article with such a headline looks lonely.
  13. +3
    11 February 2017 18: 31
    1. The unique advantage of jet flamethrowers was:
    a) a powerful psychological impact on the manpower of the enemy;
    b) the ability to act point blank (for embrasure or bunker ventilation shaft, for example).
    The so-called jet flamethrower is not capable of this.
    2. And they are not flamethrowers, in fact, but rocket-propelled grenade launchers with incendiary grenade (RPO "Lynx") or thermobaric (RPO-A) action. It’s just that the RKhBZ troops grabbed their teeth into the nomenclature.
    3. Having no analogues in the world RPO "Lynx" ha is actually ineffective garbage. I had to shoot enough. So, in the July heat, set a dry haystack ...
    1. 0
      11 February 2017 21: 56
      But the jet flamethrower gets much farther, and the ammunition of a volumetric explosion gets through any slots.

      Ball machine gun mounts to flamethrowers are generally quite stable
    2. 0
      17 February 2017 03: 27
      b) the ability to act point blank (for embrasure or bunker ventilation shaft, for example).


      Only for this we must still creep to this embrasure at point blank range. Alive by itself. And this is already a non-trivial task.

      In the modern world, thermobaric ammunition is used to defeat such targets, the explosive “flows” inside non-sealed buildings and is also blown up inside without the need for a direct hit, for example, in the embrasure. Well, you can shoot them from a distance, using guided projectiles (there are thermal bars for Cornet) from a very tangible distance.
  14. 0
    11 February 2017 21: 23
    Of course I'm not fucking, but ... Why is the grenade launcher called a flamethrower? In the word flamethrower, I have different associations. Stream of fire! Anyway, the fire is psychologically worse. What is the difference between such "pseudo-flame throwers" from grenade launchers?
    1. +1
      11 February 2017 22: 23
      Because it doesn’t kill with fragments, but with temperature, pressure and a blast wave ...
  15. +2
    12 February 2017 14: 03
    "It is believed that for the first time in droves, flamethrowers were used Fritz"- what kind of nationality is this?
  16. 0
    15 February 2017 10: 57
    And the flamethrowers who were captured were waiting for toasting from their own weapons. On both sides of the front line.