Advanced AFAR-radars for front-line and prospective MiGs: unprecedented potential for upgrading video conferencing (part of 1)

44

Technological demonstrator of promising airborne radar with active phased array "Zhuk-AME". At 50%, a long range will be realized thanks to advanced manufacturing technology of transceiver modules based on a low-temperature co-fired ceramic substrate. Due to the much higher thermal conductivity of the dielectric glass-ceramic substrate, it will be possible to more effectively cool the radar of this radar, which will increase the power of each module from 5 to 7-8 W


DETAILS OF THE WESTERN COURSE ON UPDATING ON-BOARD RADAR RADAR SIGHTING COMPLEXES FOR A TACTICAL DEFENSE Aviation



An integral part of the complex modernization of tactical fighters of the 4 generation to the level of machines with “two pluses” is the integration of modern on-board radar with passive and active headlights into their on-board electronic equipment, which always requires the introduction of high-tech digital control interfaces and the transformation of information from the new RCMS. The recognized leaders in this field are the Russian, American, European, and also Chinese aerospace concerns giants, which today are conducting a multi-level modernization of the Su-30, MiG-29, F-15C, F-16C, J-10B, J-15 fighter jets , as well as the Typhoon EF-2000. Let's start with those corporations whose programs have already managed to distinguish themselves as the greatest export success, and demand among domestic customers, some of whom are involved in working on these contracts. Anyway, but the favorite today is the staff company Northrop Grumman, which supplies modern on-board radars from Lockheed Martin as part of the external and internal sales of the upgraded F-16C / D and upgraded F-16A / B modifications.

So, for example, on January 16 of 2017, the ambitious 144 upgrade program of the F-16A / B Block 20 fighter 16, which is in service with the Taiwan Air Force to the F-1V level, was launched at the facilities of the Taiwanese company Aerospace Industrial Development Corporation in Taichung. The modernization contract was concluded between the Ministry of Defense of Taiwan and Lockheed Martin 2012 on October 16. It provides for the enhanced re-equipment of the F-83A / B to a more advanced digital circuitry, advanced pilot cockpit indicator equipment, as well as onboard systems, including the AN / APG-XNUMX SABR (with the synthesized aperture mode) onboard AFAR-radar, new widescreen LCD MFI for the withdrawal of tactical information, a modern high-performance on-board computer and a new integrated electronic warfare station. The successful signing of this contract was facilitated by many years of military-political tensions between Taipei and Beijing, which was established due to disagreements over the territorial identity of Taiwan. In connection with this situation, the security department of the latter began implementing numerous defense programs to protect against possible "expansion" of the PRC.

The second customer of a similar upgrade package for their F-16C was the Singapore Defense Ministry. Despite more or less normal relations with China, the richest city-state of Southeast Asia maintains very close political and defense ties with the United States, Great Britain and Australia, which are among the main participants in the "anti-Chinese axis." For this reason, Singapore pays maximum attention to the combat potential of its Air Force, armed with which the 32 heavy tactical fighter of the 4 ++ generation F-15SG already consists. The vehicles are equipped with a powerful radar with AFAR AN / APG-63 (V) 3 with a detection range of typical targets 165 km, and by total characteristics they correspond to Qatari and Arabian modifications F-15QA and F-15SA. As for the Singaporean F-16C / D improvement contract, it will update the 32 single-seat F-16C and 43 twin-seat F-16D in the amount of 914 million dollars. The third verified customer can be the Republic of Korea Air Force, which 22 of October 2015 signed with Lockheed Martin a contract to upgrade X-NUMX F-134 Block 16 fighters to F-32V worth 16 billion. A set of options similar to the Taiwanese contract. Thus, only the Taiwanese, Singaporean and South Korean contracts for the renewal of 2,7 “Falcons” are already estimated at 353 billion dollars, without taking into account the possibility of starting such work to re-equip the Polish, Danish, Turkish air forces, etc. What does the promising radar with AFAR AN / APG-7,1 SABR multi-purpose fighter F-83A / B / C / D.

Firstly, it is a significantly longer range for detecting air targets: an object with 2 m2 EPR can be detected and escorted by 150-160 km at a distance and captured at a distance of about 125 km. Accompanied by much smaller targets than the usual airborne radar with a slit antenna array (RAD) AN / APG-66. Modern high-performance computing base AN / APG-83 SABR allows each AFM AFAR (or MRP groups) to operate at its own frequency, simulating a complex radiation pattern in LPI mode (“low signal interception capability”) for outdated birch SPOs. Also AFAR has many times higher noise immunity and resolution when scanning water / sea surface in the synthetic aperture mode (SAR). The station of the previous generation AN / APG-68 (V) 9, although it has the SAR mode, its resolution is very mediocre and does not allow to classify small ground targets, based on their geometric features.

Secondly, AN / APG-83 has a much higher bandwidth (in SNP mode no less than 20-30 VC), target channel (8 simultaneously fired targets), as well as hardware adaptedness for using part of the receiving-transmitting modules AFAR as emitters radio interference. The latter option also found use in the AN / APG-81 radar of the X-Numx generation F-5A fighter. Thirdly, as each radar with active AFAR, AN / APG-35 has many times greater reliability (time between failures). And even after the failure of an anti-personnel unit, the effectiveness of the station remains at a level that allows the combat mission to be completed. All radar AN / APG-83 SABR, entering the external and internal markets of weapons, are at the level of EMD initial alert, which is fully consistent with large-scale production of products.

Similar programs are being conducted by European groups of companies specializing in aerospace technology. Such programs include the design and development of promising AFAR-radar "Captor-E". The works involve well-known European companies Selex Galileo, Indra Systems and EADS Defense Electronics (Cassidian), united in the Euroradar consortium. The Captor-E station was designed specifically to replace the aging radar with the Captor-M ECR-90 “Captor-M” on the EF-2000 “Typhoon” multi-purpose tactical fighter jets, which are in service with the air forces of the European states of the Arabian Peninsula ; it will also be installed on new versions of the IPA5 / 8 machine.

Tactical and technical parameters of the new radar, in comparison with the previous “Captor-M”, are unique not only in the Typhoon modernization line, but also among American programs for implementing AN / APG-63 (V) 3 and AN / APG-83 SABR in the Iglo and Falconov avionics. “Captor-E” has a rare technical feature for AFARs: the antenna array is not fixed on a fixed module, but is equipped with a specialized azimuth turning mechanism, due to which the viewing sector in the azimuth plane is 200 degrees, which is 80 degrees more than that of the “Raptor” one Radar AN / APG-77. The new “Keptor” can “look into” the rear hemisphere, which no known on-board radar with AFAR, except for radar with passive HEADLIGHTS, is capable of today. Moreover, fighter-type targets (2-3 and 2 EPR) will be detected by the “Captor-E” radar at a distance of 220-250 km, which is by far the best indicator among airborne radars for light multipurpose fighters. At the moment, prototypes of this station are being tested at British Typhoon, and their results are quite successful, which already in the near future promises Euro-Radar multibillion-dollar contracts in the European and Asian markets.



Do not lag behind in the update programs of their “light aircraft fleet” of front-line fighters and Swedes. SAAB, for example, in 2008, announced the launch of the development of the promising 4 ++ fighter of the JAS-39E Gripen-NG. In addition to the modules of the highly advanced high-speed tactical information exchange system CDL-39, new fighters will receive a promising airborne radar with AFAR ES-05 "Raven" (in the photo) from the Italian company "Selex ES". The station will be represented by more than 1000 MRP, capable of implementing all the modes of operation known for AFAR, including the creation of energy “dips” of the radiation pattern in the direction of the enemy’s electronic warfare means. Similarly, the radar “Captor-E”, “Raven” will provide the system with mechanical adjustment of the antenna array, which will bring its viewing area to 200 degrees, allowing you to “look” 10 degrees into the rear hemisphere of the machine, providing firing “over the shoulder”. Naturally, the target detection range in this mode will be less in 3-4 times due to strong energy losses of the receiving-transmitting aperture area of ​​the radar complex. The ES-05 “Raven” on-board radar is capable of detecting a target with an 3 2 EPR at a distance of 200 km with simultaneous tracking of 20 airborne objects. The station has a liquid and air cooling system.

Behind the Raven radar antenna module (on the upper surface of the fuselage nose, in front of the cockpit canopy), one can see the fairing of the Skyward-G optical-electronic sighting system developed by Leonardo Airborne & Space Systems. According to the information from the advertising sheet, the sensor is bispectral and operates in 2 main infrared ranges of 3-5 microns and 8-12 microns. The first range is shorter wavelength and allows excellent selection of targets with a low infrared signature against the background of surrounding objects (trees, structures, relief details); the range of this range is not as high as that of the long-wave. The range of 8-12 microns does not have the ability to realize high-quality selection of small-sized targets with a low IR signature, but its range of action is much greater than that of the former.

The Skyward-G / SHU optical-electronic sighting system has 4 viewing mode: narrow angle (8 x 64 hail), medium angle (16 x 12,8 hail), wide angle (30 x 24 hail), it implements visualization of the accompanied object, and also common mode, which covers 170 grad in the azimuth plane and 120 grad in elevation. The power of the air-cooled OLPC Skyward-G reaches 400 watts. The station accompanies up to 200 targets in air-to-surface and air-to-air modes.

MODERNIZATION OF RUSSIAN "TACTICS" OF THE MIG-29 FAMILY: WORKING IS, BUT THE EMBODIMENT "IN IRON" IS DELAYED

As we can see, in Western corporations things are progressing relatively successfully and with constant positive dynamics; and this does not take into account the fact that at least 300 F-16C / D units in service with the US Air Force are being upgraded with new radars, after which these fighters will completely surpass our MiG-29С / СМТ and Su-27ММ in long-range air combat mode. How can we respond to such ambitious state programs? What asymmetric measures is being worked out by the Russian Defense Ministry to eliminate the dangerous tendency to lag behind the AFARization of the combat units of the USAF fighter aviation? These questions are very urgent, relating to the rank of strategic.

As you know, on January 27 of 2017 in the Moscow region of Lukhovitsy, an international presentation of the most advanced version of the light tactical fighter MiG-35 "Fulcrum-F" was successfully held. Despite the fact that the machine does not belong to the 5 generation, special attention was paid to the representatives of the American and European media. And this is absolutely not surprising, since the MiG-35 is the only Russian multi-purpose light-class fighter capable of achieving complete superiority over Rafahl, Typhoon, F-16C Block 60, F-15SE “Silent Eagle”, F / A-18E / F and even any F-35 "Lightning-2" modification. Moreover, according to statements by the BKS Commander-in-Chief of Russia Viktor Bondarev and information from other sources, approximately 140 of the 170 serial MiG-35 will receive promising airborne radar with an active phased array of the Beetle family. Such a number of these machines is enough to change the balance of power in their favor in any air direction (HV) East European theater; Yes, and in the closest air combat, the MiG-35 will be overcome by any NATO multipurpose fighter. At the beginning of our previous material, we already said that without taking into account the range, the combat potential of the MiG-35 with promising radar stations is one step ahead of that of heavy Su-30CM: Falkrum speed is higher on 0,25M (about 2450 against 2150 km / h), afterburner 11% higher traction (2647 vs. 2381 kgf / m2), which means that the MiG accelerating qualities are much higher. Moreover, the crew of the MiG-35 will be able to more quickly and reliably fix the suddenly emerging air threats, and then also quickly eliminate them, which the crew of the Su-30CM will not be able to do.

The fact is that on the lower surface of the left nacelle and on the gargrote the MiG-35 contains high-resolution opto-electronic sensors NS-OAR (for viewing the lower hemisphere) and Sun-OAR (for viewing the upper hemisphere), combined into a common detection station the attacking SOAR missiles, operating in the TV band, and capable of detecting enemy EASOs at a distance of 30 km, and escort to 5-7 km. This station will transmit the coordinates of threatening missiles to the fighter’s computerized SLA, and then to air combat missiles of the P-73RMD-2 or P-77 (RVV-AE) type, capable of intercepting other missiles of a similar class. Also, in addition to the standard nose optic-electronic aiming complex OLS-UEM, an overhead container with a turret is installed on the right-hand nacelle, in which an auxiliary complex OLS-K is installed, designed to observe surface and ground objects in the lower and rear hemispheres. Such a variety of optical-electronic sighting sights on the "Dryers" today can not be found - hence the high interest. On the electronic filling machine is close to the 5-th generation. But is everything as good as it seems at first sight?

Firstly, the 140 MiG-35 with new radars is not the number that will be enough to fully cover all possible theaters near our borders on the Eurasian continent, because in the Far Eastern operational direction alone we can withstand: 65 modern tactical fighter of the 4 ++ generation F-2A / B, 42 Fighter X-NUMX-generation F-5A Japanese air force, as well as several F-35A fighter squadrons deployed at the Elmendorf-Richardson airbase, and this is not counting the US Navy carrier fighter aircraft, which can It is to be transferred in an amount 22-3-x hundred units Western Pacific. The situation is similar in the northwestern as well as in the western UN, where the numerical superiority of the modernized F-4A / B / C / D and "Typhoon", which are in service with European countries, and the promising F-16A / B, which are will be purchased by Norway, the UK, the Netherlands and Denmark. It turns out such a "picture" that technologically MiG-35 is equivalent to approximately 35-2 F-3C Block 16 + or 52 "Typhoon", but the total number of our "MiGs" will be 2 - 3 times less than the new fighters from the US allies in the APR and Europe, which will not allow not only to achieve domination, but also to equalize the balance of power. The issue requires immediate resolution, and it is necessary to act in the same manner that Lockheed Martin uses - by updating the existing fleet.

At the moment, in the combat units of the VKS of Russia, there are about 250 multi-purpose front-line fighters MiG-29С / М2 / СМТ and UBT, as well as several hundred machines of the 9-12 and 9-13 modification on preservation. The most advanced modifications among them are the MiG-29CMT of different variants (“Products 9-17 / 19 / 19Р”), present in the number of 44 units, as well as the MiG-29М2. These fighters belong to the generation of "4 +" and are equipped with onboard radar H019MP Topaz and H010MP Zhuk-ME. The stations are built around a modern digital data interchange bus in the MIL-STD-1553B standard avionics architecture and have hardware support for the Synthetic Aperture Mode (SAR) with an additional GMTI (Ground Moving Target Indicator) detection and tracking mode at speeds up to 15 km / h. The radar data functionality is similar to the American stations AN / APG-80 and AN / APG-83 SABR for bundling Falcons, but there are significant differences between them. If the state-owned products have long been built on the basis of active phased arrays with electronically controlled beam, our improved Topaz and Beetles are represented by mechanically controlled slotted antenna arrays, which means that there are such disadvantages as:

- low resolution in the mode of the synthesized aperture and tracking of the moving ground targets (GMTI), constituting 15 meters, while the centimeter AFAR-radar in this mode gives resolution 1-5 meters, which is achieved by a large number of individually controlled receiving-transmitting modules, able to form the most complex spatial pattern configurations;

- low bandwidth on the number of routes followed by air targets (the radar H019MP and H010MP can accompany no more than 10 air objects on the aisle); stations with AFAR can accompany from 20 to 30 and more;

- low target channel, which for the H019MP Topaz is only 2 simultaneously fired with Р-77 (РВВ-АЕ) missiles, and for the Х010П Zhuk-ME - no more than 4 goals, while the airborne radar with active and passive HEADLIGHTS are capable of “capturing” on accurate auto tracking and simultaneously firing from 8 to 16 targets;

- the impossibility of forming “failures” in the directivity pattern for the area of ​​space in which the electronic countermeasures of the enemy are functioning, because of this, stations with AARs have extremely low noise immunity from such advanced EW aircraft as F / A-18G;

- the lack of simultaneous operation in air-sea / ground modes, as well as air-to-air modes, due to which the pilot and the system operator lose momentary awareness of the tactical situation at the same time on the ground and air sectors of the theater of military operations; AFAR and PFAR have this feature.


Approximately such a list of tactical and technical deficiencies exists today in the “baggage” of our combatant MiG-29CMT and MiG-29М2, the number of which in units barely exceeds 50-60 units. Their on-board radar complexes Topaz and Zhuk-ME have the only plus — increased pulse power, due to which the range of target detection with EPR 3 м2 increased from 70 to 115 km, which is an excellent increase for a conventional WAR; but this is not enough for long-range combat with European and American F-16C, equipped with SABR radar.


Multifunctional airborne radar with a slit antenna array (W) AN / APG-68 (V) 9. This station is equipped with most of the generation of fighter "4 +" F-16C Block 52 +, consisting in service of the Air Force of the countries of Western and Eastern Europe, as well as the Middle East. In the long-range air combat mode, the AN / APG-68 (V) 9 parameters on the 10-15% exceed those of the N019MP Topaz of our most popular MFIs MiG-29С: the indicator is not so significant, given the presence of medium-range air combat P-missiles 77. At the same time, the F-16C Block 52 + air-to-ground tasks are superior to our most numerous light front-line aviation fighter assets: Topazs are deprived of the “on the ground” mode of operation, while AN / APG-68 ( V) 9 adapted to the mapping of the terrain


The remaining vehicles of the MiG-29C modification, in the amount of slightly more than 100 units, have an even more outdated “stuffing” built around the SUV-29С armament control system with an integrated radar sighting system RLPK-29М. This complex is represented by an early version of the H019M Topaz radar, which does not have hardware support for ground targets, and also has a standard energy potential that allows detecting targets with 3X2 EPR at 70 km distance and “capturing” only 2 aerial targets. The weapons control system SUV-29С is adapted for the use of air combat missiles Р-77, but due to the low capabilities of the НHNUMXМ radar, the MiG-019С can be opposed only to those F-29C “blocks” that did not pass the modernization program and are carried on board Old-fashioned AN / APG-16 slot radars with a fighter-type target detection range on the order of 66-60 km. Even the modification of the F-65C / D Block 16 +, which the Polish Air Force has, is likely to be outdated by the outdated RLPK Н52М MiG-019С fighter, especially since the Poles have long acquired a modification of the URAVV AMRAAM with the AIM-29C-km increased to 120 km 120, and such F-7C in Poland alone 16 units.

The conclusion is this: the situation with the perfection of the onboard radio-electronic equipment of light front-line fighter jets of the VKS of Russia MiG-29С, and to a certain extent MiG-29СМТ / М2, is really critical. With all the perfection of the airframe and the power plant, allowing to win the closest air combat from any western 4 fighter and even 5 generations, our serial MiGs are completely vulnerable to any other threat from the modern network-centric theater of operations. Some may argue that such machines as Su-27СМ, Su-30СМ, and also Su-35С can completely correct this situation, but this opinion is not entirely objective. Heavy tactical fighters, especially the Su-35S, are more designed to create a powerful air defense line and gain air superiority at long-distance approaches to the air borders of the state, as well as to accompany DRLOI airplanes, air command posts, and military transport aircraft from enemy fighters 4- go and 5-th generations. They can also successfully carry out long-range anti-ship and anti-radar missions using X-31AD and X-58USHKE missiles. We don’t have enough of these machines to close all the technological “gaps” observed in the sector of light front-line aviation, and especially with the current production rates of T-50 PAK-FA.

The issue can be resolved by re-equipping all the MiG-29 VKS being in service with promising on-board radars developed by Fazatron-NIIR JSC and its subsidiary Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies. The main applicants are the multi-channel airborne radar Zhuk-AE and Zhuk-AME; these products embody the most advanced developments of the Russian defense industry in the area of ​​the AESA, and according to this, they are already ahead of all that used in the H011 Bars and H035 Irbis-E stations of the multipurpose Su-30CM and Su-35С fighters, with the exception of range of action.

The procedure for unifying new radars with OMS of more modern MiG-29CMT and MiG-29М2 will be carried out under a lightweight scheme, since these aircraft were originally developed using the multiplex data bus of the MIL-STD-1553B standard, the same bus with an open architecture forms the basis of the tactical weapons control system MiG-35 fighter. As for the older MiG-29S, here you will need a complete replacement of the electronic "core" of fighter control, built around the old BTsVM Ts101M, which is not designed to work in conjunction with the next-generation digital interfaces "Zhukov". There is a real chance to radically modernize and “put on the wing” several hundred front-line and “mothballed” MiG-29А / С, which completely eliminates the technical backlog of the entire fleet of light front-line aviation from foreign fighters of the 4 ++ generation. What are the features and advantages of promising airborne radar "Zhuk-AE" and "Zhuk-AME"?

The first, “Beetle-AE” (FGA-29), was developed from the 2006 year on the basis of developments obtained by “Phazatron” during the design of a not very successful early model “Beetle-AME” (FGA-01), having an impermissibly large mass in 520 kg. The new product is widely used compact and lightweight monolithic integrated circuits (MIS), which today can be found in any modern digital device. The aperture diameter of the Zhuk-AE AFAR was reduced to 500 mm (total diameter - about 575 m), in comparison with the 700-mm FGA-01 web; This was done to better match the internal diameter of the radio transparent fairing of the “154” prototype board (MiG-29М2), on which the new station was tested. The FGA-29 canvas is represented by 680 receiving and transmitting modules with 5 W power, which is quite enough to realize 50 cm resolution at a distance of up to 20 km and 3 m at a distance of 30 km. The station's pulsed power is 34 kW, which makes it possible to detect targets with 3 m2 EPR at a distance of up to 148 km to the front hemisphere and to 60 km to the rear hemisphere (in pursuit). Beetle AE accompanies air targets on the 30 aisle and simultaneously captures 6; in the mode of close air combat, the so-called “Swivel” mode can be used, which operates when synchronized with the helmet-mounted target designation system of the pilot or system operator.


Experimental radar "Zhuk-AE" (FGA-29) on board the prototype of the promising light multipurpose fighter MiG-35


Thanks to the individual control of the operating frequencies of individual APMs (or their groups), as well as a more sensitive and interference-free transducer of electromagnetic waves reflected from the target, Zhuk-AE has a very significant advantage over other airborne radars - a slight decrease in the detection range of air objects against the earth's surface totaling 8-11%, for radar with PFAR, this figure is about 15-18%, as proved by the tests of the Irbis-E radar operating in the broad sector of the review: VTs with EPR 3mXNU MX was detected at a distance of 2 km (against the background of free space), and 200 km (against the background of the earth's surface). Even here we can see a noticeable plus radar with AFAR.

High performance of the “ZHUK-AE” is also noted when operating in air-sea / ground mode: a heavy armored vehicle group, or an artillery self-propelled artillery can be detected at a range of 30-35 km, a surface ship of the corvette class - 150 km and “ destroyer "- more than 200 km. The air-to-surface mode has several dozen sub-modes, including a synthesized aperture, the ability to freeze the terrain map with all detected surface objects, detecting and tracking moving units (GMTI), measuring the speed of the carrier in accordance with the speed of displacement of stationary objects in the fighter's coordinate system, following the terrain at near-sonic speeds, which is used in the "breakthrough" air defense of the enemy. The radar review sector is standard for fixed AFAR apertures and is 120 degrees in the azimuth and elevation planes, which is a drawback with mobile AFAR stations, for example, “Captor-E”, but the mass of the RLC is only 200 kg, which is ideal for upgrading light MiG-29С / СМТ / М2. The total capabilities of Zhuka-AE are between the American AN / APG-80 and AN / APG-79 radars, which are equipped with the F-16C Block 60 and F / A-18E / F "Super Hornet". Modernization of the existing MiG-29C / SMT radar "Zhuk-AE", as well as more advanced optical-electronic complexes OLS-UEM and modern information field of the cockpit will provide an opportunity to significantly outperform the Polish F-16C Block 52 + and the German "Typhoons", equipped with outdated radars with a slit antenna array. At the same time, the lag behind the “Typhoons” with the radar “Captor-E”, as well as the F-35A will be significant. MiGs will need an even more powerful airborne radar with an active phased array antenna, the Zhuk-AME.

This station was first presented at the “Airshow China-2016” aerospace exhibition in Chinese Zhuhai in 2016. The Zhuk-AME receiving and receiving modules are manufactured using a completely new technology, based on three-dimensional microwave conductors generated in the process of low-temperature co-fired LTCC ceramics ("Low Temperature Co-Fired Ceramic"). The birth of super-strong crystalline structure of conductors occurs as a result of burning of a multicomponent mixture of special glasses, ceramics, as well as special conductive pastes based on gold, silver or platinum, which in certain proportions are added to this mixture. These APM have many advantages over the standard arsenide-gallium elements used in most well-known radar with AFAR (Japanese J-APG-1, "Captor-E", etc.), and in particular:

- excellent mechanical stability, achieved by a low coefficient of thermal expansion and high elasticity in a wide range of operating temperatures, these qualities are the basis of a long service life of the APM;

- stable electrically conductive indicators in all frequency ranges of waves, up to the millimeter Ka-band, due to which there is a great stability of AFAR operation in several modes at once, including EW;

- the density of the ceramic base of PPM made by LTCC technology ensures the tightness of the conductor elements from the negative effects of the external environment, in other words, the Beetle AME can continue to work even in case of damage to the radio transparent radar nose radome;

- higher thermal conductivity of LTCC ceramic substrates, in comparison with organic analogues (4 W / MK against 0,1-0,5 W / mK, respectively), makes it possible to more efficiently cool the most high-temperature zones of PPM, especially when using metal heat sinks;

- the process of creating such PPMs does not require high firing temperatures, all that is enough is 850-900ºС.


In the case of LTCC technology, low-temperature co-fired ceramics is a low-profile dielectric substrate for platinum, gold, or silver RL-wavelength emitters / receivers. It is much more heat-resistant than conventional printed circuit boards made of organic compounds and allows you to work with an increased energy potential: the receiving and transmitting modules of AFU Zhuk-AME can have a power of the order of 6-8 W. This led to the fact that the promising radar "Zhuk" increased the target detection range with the 3 m2 EPR to about 220-260 km, which is comparable to the station "Captor-E". According to the statements of “Phasotron”, “Beetle-AME” was developed both for installation on fighter jets of the “4 ++” MiG-35, and on the MiG-29С / СМТ. The antenna module, along with the web and loops, has a mass of the order of 100 kg, which is an unprecedented indicator among Western fighters. Cloth station represented 960 MRP.


Demonstrator on-board radar "Captor-E"


High-resolution high-resolution “Beetle-AME” modes of operation make it possible to accurately classify sea, land and air objects by their shape and radar signature due to comparison with a loaded reference base of hundreds or even thousands of units. Moreover, the target can be identified from a small distance, when the SAR mode has a resolution of 50 cm, or in the case when the target is radio-emitting. Then the base of the frequency templates of numerous enemy radar facilities is used, which can be integrated into the updated SPO of the upgraded MiG-29. The Beetle can operate in LPI mode, to complicate the work of the enemy EW, or in the passive mode - for covert access and attack on the enemy’s radio-emitting targets, among which may be ground-based or multifunctional radars of anti-aircraft missile systems and RTR stations and EW air-based.

To be continued ...
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    8 February 2017 07: 21
    100 kg for such a product is very small. It is interesting how heat is removed during operation.
    1. +2
      8 February 2017 09: 56
      Quote: zulusuluz
      It is interesting how heat is removed during operation.

      =====
      Typically, such systems use special coolants. The Swedes really invented for the side-view radar on their AWACS aircraft an original cooling system with an oncoming air flow, but there the antenna arrays are located above the fuselage in special fairings. For a fighter, this will not work ...
      1. 0
        18 March 2017 23: 35
        On the IL-38 in Legend, a similar air cooling system
    2. 0
      8 February 2017 14: 04
      . It is interesting how heat is removed during operation.


      Yes, they jumped far. KNP at Sapphire 23 MLA 300 watts. These grids should be at least no less. With an “amazing” efficiency of 15%, 3 kW of heat must be used somewhere. The "soldering iron" is powerful weighing 100 kilos .. Yes, and the lattice of the modules is multi-story and dense. Evaporative would fit with heat pipes. Although as a matter of fact, I do not know. Engineering is not an easy task.
      1. +1
        8 February 2017 16: 07
        Dmitry Rogozin said after the presentation that this problem on the MiG-35 was solved. In general, on the Su-27 and MiG-29, the equipment was cooled by air running into the same air intake, 10-15% of the air entering the air intake went to this. I read about it in one of the topics at "Airbase". I do not know how much this problem was solved on the Su-30SM. It is a pity, of course, that AFAR will only go with the second batch, and the MiG-29 SMT, probably only this equipment will be installed on a remake during the modernization, since they have the potential for modernization for such systems. Interestingly, there is information that the MiG-35 will be assembled at the Sokol, although the wound stated that 50% of the equipment for the machine would be produced there, and the fighter would be assembled at Lukhovitsy, would Lukhovitsy be completely rebuilt to produce IL -112? I would hope that this is not so, but in one video, an official of the Falcon said that they had built a line for the MiG-29M / M2.
  2. +1
    8 February 2017 07: 46
    Good and interesting article.
  3. 0
    8 February 2017 07: 48
    The only way we can fill in the gaps is the modernization of the old MiG-29M ... As I understand it, after putting Zhuk with AFAR on the conveyor radar, we will see something in a heavier class, for Sukhoi.
    1. +5
      8 February 2017 09: 02
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Good and interesting article.
      No. Unfortunately, the author is inclined once again to wishful thinking.
      At the moment, in the combat units of the Russian Aerospace Forces there are about 250 multipurpose front-line MiG-29С / М2 / СМТ and UBT fighter jets, as well as several hundreds of “9-12” and “9-13” modifications on conservation.
      Do you believe that?
      1. +2
        8 February 2017 09: 33
        Quote: Bongo
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Good and interesting article.
        No. Unfortunately, the author is inclined once again to wishful thinking.
        At the moment, in the combat units of the Russian Aerospace Forces there are about 250 multipurpose front-line MiG-29С / М2 / СМТ and UBT fighter jets, as well as several hundreds of “9-12” and “9-13” modifications on conservation.
        Do you believe that?

        ====
        Actually, according to Military Balance 2016, the Russian Armed Forces were armed with 177 MiG-29s of various modifications (including 154 units in the Air Force Forces and 23 in the Navy). And how much is already in the MO stocks (in storage) - it is difficult to say, as well as the state in which they are.
        1. +5
          8 February 2017 09: 50
          Quote: venik
          Actually, according to the Military Balance 2016, the RF Armed Forces were armed with 177 MiG-29 of various modifications (including the Navy - 154 units and the Navy - 23).

          Agree to the numbers you specify (although they are also overpriced) and
          250 MiG-29С / М2 / SMT multipurpose front-line fighters
          - this is not the same thing.
          Quote: venik
          And how much is already in the MO stocks (in storage) - it is difficult to say, as well as the state in which they are.
          Surely you yourself guess how the aircraft are "stored" with us. And the MiGs of the first modifications are for the most part scrap metal that does not have any chance of flying into the sky. The main scourge of the 29's is glider corrosion.
          1. +6
            8 February 2017 15: 19
            Store as prescribed. If something is covered somewhere, these are questions to the head of the storage base. Or do you think that our process is set worse than that of ukrov, who pulled out a bunch of trash 40 years ago, and, suddenly, it is still quite operational?
            1. +2
              8 February 2017 15: 22
              Quote: EvilLion
              Store as prescribed. If something is covered somewhere, these are questions to the head of the storage base. Or do you think that our process is set worse than that of ukrov, who pulled out a bunch of trash 40 years ago, and, suddenly, it is still quite operational?


              I do not think, I know. It has been observed repeatedly. And what does the "Ukrainians" have to do with it? request Let’s not even be here about Ukraine? Although I wonder about the 40 summer trash, what exactly do you mean? More details please!
          2. +3
            8 February 2017 15: 41
            As for scrap, it’s you too (although our storage base, this is of course the last way for airplanes), Indian and Polish fighters, these are also old men, Serbian ones too, but their resource is far from exhausted and extended. Although the same Poles can safely transfer to the F-16, the MiG pilots do not want to. About the MiG-29SMT, yes, bust. we have them within 46 units. In general, the MiG-29 of the old versions in the VKS has no more than two regiments, therefore not all rubbish is in storage, there are many withdrawn from the VKS not so long ago. I think that a couple of regiments can be recruited and upgraded and they will still serve. Of course there is corrosion, but this problem was greatly exaggerated, since only we had a “scourge” and was inflated in order to completely remove the MiG-29 from service and absorb the MiG Design Bureau of Sukhoi OJSC itself, which almost happened. Those Hindus, to which moody, shouted about everything, but not about the “scourge of corrosion”. MiG-21s are still flying and will still fly, the 29th is much younger and will still serve quite a few. By the way, the MiG-29SMT of the Algerian contract, these are old gliders and there are no problems with this scourge. Aircraft just need to be serviced on time and well, I'm not talking about kapitalku. In civil aviation, similar moments also arise in the event of a violation of the regulations for servicing equipment (the same doc. Films about plane crashes, there are also quite a few, corrosion, then fatigue cracks and ..., and all of the violation of the maintenance of equipment). It was just a time when the MiG simply spread rot and everyone and everyone hung on it, and now they pour a lot of dirt, but times are changing anyway and it pleases.
            1. +4
              8 February 2017 15: 53
              Quote: vanek77
              As for scrap, it's you too (although our storage base, this is of course the last way for aircraft)

              They inevitably turn into scrap metal there and I personally do not know other examples, although it is possible that they are.
              Quote: vanek77
              In general, the MiG-29 of old versions in the VKS has no more than two regiments, therefore not all rubbish is stored, there are a lot of decommissioned VKS not so long ago. I think that a couple of regiments can be recruited and upgraded and they will still serve.
              Are you sure this makes sense? Suppose even that these aircraft were normally stored. But what is the residual life of the glider? At MiG, he was not so big. If not mistaken 4000 flight hours.
              Quote: vanek77
              Of course there is corrosion, but this problem was greatly exaggerated

              A difficult question, the inspection of the MiG-29 fleet after several disasters showed that on many machines, due to incorrect storage, corrosion reached a critical value. Personally, I have not heard that this would be the case on the Su-27. Although, when upgrading to the level of Su-27СМ in the factory, it was necessary to strengthen the planes and limit operational overload. The example of Indian MiGs is not correct, in this country, cars in the rain do not get wet and there are no negative temperatures there.
              Quote: vanek77
              It was just a time when the MiG simply spread rot and everyone and everything hung on it, and now they pour a lot of dirt.

              The fact that MiGs leave me is also not happy No. But I am also not happy with authors and commentators trying to overestimate our capabilities. negative Who are we kidding ourselves? Our "partners" are well aware of the state of affairs in our aviation.
              1. +3
                8 February 2017 16: 41
                4000 hours is a very good figure, the F-16 has similar numbers, but for example, Hindus exploit their fighters very intensively and even mercilessly, I think they have passed 4000. As for overstating, I also consider this a bad thing and often wrote about it.
                As for catastrophes, it was for this reason that one fighter crashed, this case I remember just after it the company against the fighter became simply wild. How many climbed the sites, the more I did not find the information that the MiGs fought precisely for this reason, just checking the fighters on the ground revealed a similar problem for a couple dozen cars all over Russia. But then again, the fighters at that time were mostly on the ground and didn’t very much service and check them, because they didn’t fly, plus there were rumors about a possible removal of the fighter from armament, and there were already articles on this topic. But for example, the Poles had no problems with this at all, because they love their cars and cherish them, so their condition is excellent, although the cars are very old.
                There is always a point in upgrading aircraft, their resource has not been exhausted, and the Indian UPG can be easily upgraded. Our treasury is in a miserable condition, and the cords are very expensive to operate, Rogozin also spoke about this, and in Syria the Su-34 with four OFAB-250-270, for 300 km, this is not the case. Yes, and the Su-25 is not available, you can safely do it like for example the MiG-23 plus the MiG-27, it is better than rotting in storage, or being shot as a target. The measure is temporary, but still better than making a Su-34 attack aircraft (and such a thing occurs to people). The MiG is a very good car, it’s just that nobody worked on it for a long time. Overstating TTX is already the business’s job, for example, VEB has invested well in Sukhoi, and here it’s PR, it needs a profit. Now this phenomenon is widespread, and not only here.
                1. +5
                  8 February 2017 17: 12
                  Quote: vanek77
                  4000 hours is a very good number, F-16 has similar numbers

                  F-16C / D - 10 000 hours.
                  Quote: vanek77
                  As for disasters, it was for this reason that one fighter crashed

                  At least two.
                  Quote: vanek77
                  just checking fighter jets on the ground revealed a similar problem for a couple of dozen cars all over Russia

                  Almost a hundred cars.

                  Quote: vanek77
                  But then again, the fighters at that time were mostly on the ground and didn’t very much service and check them, because they didn’t fly, plus rumors about a possible removal of the fighter from armament influenced it, and there were already articles on this topic.

                  You are in my opinion confusing cause and effect. Articles appeared after it became known about the unsatisfactory condition of most of the MiGs. Let's talk directly - most of the cars were killed on the ground. and no one answered for it.
                  1. +4
                    8 February 2017 23: 24
                    Vanek77, hello! The resource of the MiG-29 glider was designed for 20 years. In service now, in the Russian Federation, a maximum of a couple of regiments. The WAF generally wrote, in my opinion, from memory, for ONE regiment (in the region of 50 vehicles).
                    Rogozin "picked up" on the topic only recently - so do not pay much attention to his statement. There one such one already reached LASER.
                    Of course, it’s hard for us to deal with all this electronics. not specialists. But the fact that the author writes is impressive. And where did all the "funeral" fighters of the front-line fighter go - did they decide to assign all tasks to Su ?! smile
                    If it is really better than the Su-30SM in what the author writes (about the advantages of AFAR); even with the same price and lower costs, the MiG looks worthy for a purchase. hi
                    Thanks to the author !!!
            2. +1
              8 February 2017 16: 15
              our storage base, this is of course the last way for aircraft


              American, suddenly also in 95% of cases, because it is unlikely that someone will need it.

              In general, the MiG-29 of old versions in the VKS has no more than two regiments, therefore not all rubbish is stored, there are a lot of decommissioned VKS not so long ago


              By the collapse of the Union, the oldest MiG-29 was 9 years old. In the 90, neither shaky, nor swollen anyway, something flew. Maybe 40 hours a year, not 200, but at least it was at the airport, and not in preserving lubricant. With the airframe resource in 2000 hours and all 150 hours of annual flight time (from the norm of 1.5 pilot per car, and 100 hours per pilot) is this a sycoca of years of work? At the same time, the raid gradually grew from 2006-2007. It seems to have been recently, but 10 years ago. It is not surprising that the Su-30M2 had to be made new, the twin Su-27UB, as the most exploited ones, should already be completely killed, and the Su-27 are also decommissioned, even though they are younger than the MiGs. For the MiG-29, this, by the way, is also important, there may still be combat vehicles, but there’s nothing to prepare pilots for. The Czechs lost the only spark in the fire, and all MiG-29 (they had a dozen of them) after that just turned off.

              I admit that maybe the Serbs or Poles are satisfied with the overhaul of the airframe so that the car does not fall apart in the air, they replace some of the Soviet devices with new Western ones, or even Russian ones, put a “TV” instead of the pointer devices, but the radar is the same Soviet as other key systems. And yes, everything flies, the MiG-21 even flies, although its combat value in likely scenarios (not in Africa, where the enemy has the same junk) may already be close to zero.
              1. +4
                8 February 2017 16: 37
                Quote: EvilLion
                American, suddenly also in 95% of cases, because it is unlikely that someone will need it.

                Anything can happen to Americans. Like it or not, but their storage is better delivered and there are examples of the return of aircraft in operation after 20 or more. Perhaps you have already read this:
                Operation "Phantoms" in the US Air Force continues(clickable).
                Quote: EvilLion
                And yes, everything flies, the MiG-21 even flies, although its combat value in likely scenarios (not in Africa, where the enemy has the same junk) may already be close to zero.

                Here I can not agree with you, although I myself negatively assess the feasibility of upgrading old cars. The upgraded Indian MiG-21 performed well in training battles with American fighters.
      2. 0
        8 February 2017 09: 55
        Quote: Bongo
        Unfortunately, the author is inclined once again to wishful thinking.
        At the moment, in the combat units of the Russian Aerospace Forces there are about 250 multipurpose front-line MiG-29С / М2 / СМТ and UBT fighter jets, as well as several hundreds of “9-12” and “9-13” modifications on conservation.

        Why not? He did not indicate that everything was in combat readiness.
        Quote: Bongo
        as well as several hundred machines modified “9-12” and “9-13” on conservation. Do you believe that?

        Again, why not? Another thing is that the "conservation" in our country is virtually equal to-destroyed.
        1. +3
          8 February 2017 10: 40
          Quote: tomket
          Why not? He did not indicate that everything was in combat readiness.

          Sorry, but the numbers are clearly not true No.
          Quote: tomket
          Again, why not? Another thing is that the "conservation" in our country is virtually equal to-destroyed.

          The indicated number of 250 fighters - this can only be with the vehicles "in storage", from where they can no longer be returned.
  4. +7
    8 February 2017 08: 02
    An excellent advertising article, the author just forgot that LTCC technology is "not our" technology. And the set of installations for implementing this technology is not ours. It is enough to declare an embargo on the supply of special pastes for this technology, and spare parts for a set of equipment - and the production of AFAR antennas will be "blocked". Simply, Almaz-Fazotron acquired in “sweet times” a line for the production of LTCC modules, spent a lot of money on mastering the production of these modules, closing the vacuum-technological direction that was not dependent on Western sanctions, and now put the Russian military aviation in an unpleasant position. Fortunately, he is not the only manufacturer of MRP elements in Russia, and there are other, no less competitive, technologies. laughing
    1. +2
      8 February 2017 09: 48
      The trouble is that in the pursuit of momentary profit we lose prospects
      1. +1
        8 February 2017 13: 00
        “We” are not us. Each problem has names, passwords, appearances.
  5. +2
    8 February 2017 11: 26
    AFAR is needed by aircraft ... whose technology? ... for how long is all this ... absolutely not interesting ... the main thing is to develop your own ... the more production problems are solved during the release of AFAR ... the better ... it is important to start at home and therefore we will improve and create something his ... domestic and unparalleled ...
  6. +1
    8 February 2017 12: 41
    It’s a good article, it’s true that it’s unpleasant to realize that we, as always, are behind in electronics, and if we are ahead of development, then implementation is a real pain for us ... time will show of course and put everything in its place, let's see what it will offer in the near future Ministry of Defense, only one strategic question, but do we have this time?
    1. +4
      8 February 2017 13: 29
      Quote: Alexey-74
      A good article, it’s really unpleasant to realize that we, as always, are behind in electronics

      Russia is not even one of the top ten countries in investment in R&D, China annually increases 18% of investments in R&D, but Russia invests well in US government bonds calling it a safety cushion, maybe it’s time for the Russian leadership to understand that the country's best airbag is not strengthening without scientific progress.
      Sadness however.
  7. +2
    8 February 2017 13: 34
    And when will this radar appear in metal? Without it, it makes no sense to begin production of the MiG-35.
    Well, about the modernization of the old series of the twenty-ninth standing on conservation, these are fairy tales of the Vienna forest.
    I work in the runway area of ​​the Tolmachevo airport, just in the take-off range. MiG 31 see often, Su-34, too. Su-27/30 sometimes fly by. I saw the Tu-22M3 when they drove to Kyrgyzstan during exercises, saw the Chinese, who flew to air darts, Su-25 and Su-24 fly. I have never seen a MiG-29. A-50 and then drive. And on 29th in the course of everything only are registered.
    The most reckless, in love with speed, these are 31x pilots. 25-30 degrees Climb on the afterburner, until the point is gone. They try this on the A-50, a couple of times I thought that they would fall on the wing, they lacked a bit of engine power. lol And they smoke on takeoff))

    By the way, which of the pilots will explain, often in An-12s approaching, one of the propellers is on the feathering, if you count from left to right, then the third, is this the norm?
    1. +1
      8 February 2017 15: 08
      Quote: demiurg
      And when will this radar appear in metal? Without it, it makes no sense to begin production of the MiG-35.

      And this is a long-standing Soviet tradition - when a fighter was put into series without a radar ready for it. At the same MiG-23 radar brought only to the modification of the "M".
      1. 0
        8 February 2017 15: 19
        And then to sell this export hope without a radar? After all, everyone says that this is a hit of the season.
  8. +3
    8 February 2017 13: 43
    The issue can be resolved by re-equipping all MiG-29 airborne armament armaments with advanced on-board radars developed by Fazatron-NIIR JSC, as well as its subsidiary, Radioelectronic Technologies Concern.


    And here is the advertisement, thank God that there are no female panty liners.

    True, there is one caveat. MiG-29С were built at the sunset of the USSR in the amount of something about 50 pcs and were mainly exported to Malaysia, it settled like the whole 18 in the native Air Force. That is, the author simply gets along, and the MiG-29 of Soviet issues remained only at the air base in Armenia, everything else was mothballed or decommissioned. The total number of old MiG-29 now seems to be about 120 machines. I could be wrong, but it doesn’t matter, there weren’t any great hundreds of them on the territory of the RSFSR, some of them were sold, some, although hardly large, could be sawn into a color meter (not by Yeltsin, but by local ensigns), some should already be stupidly written off by wear and tear. In the 2008 year, when cracks were revealed after the next accident and the fleet turned out to be mostly unsuitable for flights, the 270 MiG-29 was listed, and the intensification of flights in subsequent years was to finish off the resource. So I don’t really understand how it is possible to equip something that is not there with something.

    Maybe someone will say that a hundred Soviet cars can still be upgraded, well, so there the modernization will be on the principle of “the tank is on the balance, as long as the number plate is kept from it”, it will be necessary to attach a completely sawn glider with filling to the pilot's seat and lighting equipment.

    Heavy tactical fighters, and especially Su-35С, are more designed to create a powerful air defense line and gain superiority in the air at the far approaches to the air borders of the state, as well as to escort AWACS aircraft, air command posts, military transport aircraft from enemy fighters 4- th and xnumx th generations.


    A video card priced at 600-1000 $ is designed to play Cruzys, or Doom with relish at high graphics settings, but this does not interfere with launching one of the countless MMORPGs on it with the simplest 4-5-year-old graphics . Yes, and on a processor such as i7, you can sit and print on the Internet in Word.

    And anyway, there will not be enough planes to fight with all NATO, it is better to destroy divisions and airfields with vigorous bombs immediately in bulk.
    1. +1
      8 February 2017 13: 50
      The principle of reasonable sufficiency has not been canceled. What is needed is not an armada opposing the whole of NATO (even if we tear up the navel, we cannot take out such a quantity), but hundreds of two, three, or four modern light vehicles. That the Poles shuddered in a dream, and the Japanese sat exactly on the fifth point, this is enough, but no more is needed.
      As correctly noted, all other problems are solved by the Strategic Missile Forces.
  9. +1
    8 February 2017 15: 12
    Great article, put a plus.

    Among other things, the author walked a bulldozer around the ears of local propagandists of the advantages of F-35 over F-16, allegedly confirmed at the Red Flag 2016 exercises.
    The AN / APG-83 SABR airborne radar, installed on the latest F-16 modifications, tears the heating pad AN / APG-81 airborne radar installed on all F-35 modifications as an ace. 83-I radar allows you to detect the "inconspicuous" Penguin at a distance of the order of 90 km and take on tracking at a distance of 60 km.

    Special thanks to the author for revealing the performance of the new Russian AFAR transceiver modules made using the technology of low-temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC, Low Temperature Co-Fired Ceramic). The increased operating temperature of the anti-radar data will allow to increase the pulse power and, accordingly, the range of the radar by 50 percent.
    In addition, the use of LTCC reduces the weight of the AFAR by a factor of two and extends the radar frequency range from decimeter to millimeter waves by two orders of magnitude. T.O. the centimeter onboard radar of the aircraft will be able to receive the reflected radiation generated by the ground / ship air defense radar in the decimeter range, or to carry out illumination for the RGV-MD RCGS in the millimeter range.

    Plus, performing the functions of electronic warfare against enemy radars in the decimeter, centimeter and millimeter ranges with one reservation - except for radars equipped with AFAR. All the EW little ones played out - AFAR taught how to programmatically create “gaps” in its pattern of focus on the sectors of space in which the enemy’s electronic countermeasures function, thereby providing 100 percent protection from any EW.
  10. +2
    8 February 2017 18: 06
    It is interesting, on the basis of which the conclusion was made that: "The MiG-35 is the only Russian light-class multi-role fighter capable of achieving complete superiority over ... in any F-35 Lightning-2 modification"?
  11. +1
    8 February 2017 19: 24
    The United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) and S.V. Ilyushin Aircraft Complex signed a contract for development work on the creation of the Il-96-400M passenger liner, and in 2019 a prototype aircraft will be created.
  12. +1
    9 February 2017 10: 43
    Everything is of course simply wonderful, but why are the samples existing only as a model, already lacking analogs in the world? laughing
    1. +1
      9 February 2017 18: 32
      Because the revolution of 1991, threw the country back 20-30 years (money, brains, technology).
    2. 0
      9 February 2017 21: 42
      Something I did not see such words in the article, in my opinion the author gave enough examples to say that it does not have a world-wide analogue, but just the opposite. Moreover, the radar on the experimental 35th is also visible in the photo, where does the layout?
  13. 0
    10 February 2017 19: 38
    Where the author took the figure of 250 aircraft is unclear. It seems like more than a hundred old twins want to write off for a long time because of the unsuitability of the glider. If you upgrade to Migi, then improve those 50-60 units. Mig 29M2 / SMT, which are now in service and whose resource has not yet been worked out. And to put on them not the Beetle-AE, whose characteristics are two times worse than its Western counterparts, but the Beetle AME, whose characteristics correspond to today's tasks. The point is to put what is already out of date, if the Westerners, upgrading their fleet of aircraft, will surpass us? Although, that the AE Beetle still has an experimental status, that the AME Beetle is an even more experimental unit. It seems to me that the AE Beetle is sharpened for export versions of twinks and I would like to see on our aircraft an advanced version of the AFAR Zhuk AME, I hope it will be finished at least for 5-7 years. Therefore, there will be two versions of the Mig 35, as planned, they do not want to wait for a new radar, they will put on the first batch of cars what is at the moment. And the author's idea that the MiG 35 is better than all the light fighters of the West is too rosy. Where is it better, even if there is no radar? In dreams, if only somewhere in the future. They will put a Beetle on it, then it will be equal in power. In general, I want to believe in the best.
  14. 0
    14 February 2017 10: 50
    I read somewhere about quantum physics. And that other laws are possible there. For example, the selection of heat at which the object from which it is taken will be cooled. Well, something like that. And here the question arises that with force of gravity and overloads it will probably be possible to play like this? Like Lukyanenko’s “lord from the planet earth”. In a spaceship some kind of black ball. Which shrinks if overloads increase.
  15. 0
    27 February 2017 16: 25
    In general - everything is sad.
  16. 0
    April 30 2017 12: 39
    ... is that a lecture for the Russian Air Force ..
  17. 0
    10 June 2017 21: 23
    The second issue of the information and analytical journal Radioelectronic Technologies has gone out of print. In it, the laureates of the State Prizes of the Russian Federation Yuri Guskov and Anatoly Kanaschenkov in their article “Do not abandon AFAR halfway” stated that they have 60% ready for a prototype of a new airborne radar station with an active phased array made using 3D technology from low-temperature jointly sintering ceramics (LTCC), which they recommend for the new MiG-4 multi-functional light fighter of the “35 ++” generation. The serial model of radar was brought to 40 percent readiness, but work was suspended. “Unfortunately, RSK MiG JSC did not make a decision on organizing serial production of the radar and did not allocate funds for this development. We don’t have our own financial resources to continue them ... We asked for 1,2 billion rubles, but so far have not received anything. If funds were available ... the first sample would be submitted for testing in 12 months. The serial sample is almost half ready, ”the authors write.
  18. 0
    10 June 2017 22: 21
    I am not a specialist in aviation technology, but after reading the article, the question involuntarily arose:
    - if it is impossible to quickly put modern locators on all aircraft, then why not try to solve this problem by using MIG -29 with different locators in combat work. For example, the leader of the MIG group has a modern locator and, in the case of detecting targets at distant frontiers, by transmitting information with other aircraft (which do not have a modern locator) transfers this information to them.
    After all, MIGs are unlikely to fly alone ...