Minsk recalls Belarusian specialists from the customs structures of the EAEU

389
Information Agency TASS publishes an urgent message that the President of Belarus has decided on the participation of Belarusian specialists in the bodies of the Eurasian Economic Union. By his decision, Lukashenko recalled Belarusian officials from the customs authorities of the EAEU. This message appeared in the course of his press conference, during which Lukashenko announced “violations of customs agreements and legislation by Russia”.

Minsk recalls Belarusian specialists from the customs structures of the EAEU




Recall that on the eve of the news agency Regnum material appeared with reference to unnamed sources, which stated that Minsk is considering the possibility of withdrawing from the EAEU and the CSTO. In the same material it was noted that Moscow is not going to impede if the Belarusian leadership makes such a decision, although this decision contradicts the interests of the Belarusian people.

Against this background, during a press conference, Lukashenka said that he did not claim anything Russian, and that “the Russian leadership would be burned.” President of Belarus quotes the portal BelTA:
I do not pretend to anything Russian. But you do it in vain, on this you will suffer the most severe defeat. Not a single Russian, not a single Russian, will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, a stranger, that he has turned to the West and somewhere else. This will not believe. And your guide will burn on it. Belarus has not violated a single agreement with Russia, another thing is Russia.


It should be noted that the Russian authorities had previously invited Lukashenko to the Russian Federation. The meeting with Vladimir Putin should take place on February 8-9, but at the moment there is no confirmation of the readiness of the Belarusian leader to fly to Russia.
  • http://www.belta.by
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

389 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +66
    3 February 2017 17: 35
    We don’t get into brothers, you want to leave, go yourself, just don’t get burned on this.
    1. +107
      3 February 2017 17: 42
      Against this background, Lukashenko during a press conference said that he did not pretend to be anything Russian

      In addition to Russian cheap loans, as well as cheap oil and gas, military equipment, and even more, more cheaply, and other nishtyaks, but it doesn’t pretend. wink
      that "the leadership of Russia will be burned."

      Dad, do not go too far, Rostov is not rubber, feed you later. what
      1. +38
        3 February 2017 17: 46
        Aged, handed over, it's time to retire.
        1. +19
          3 February 2017 18: 01
          the son has not grown up yet.
          1. +2
            3 February 2017 19: 23
            This is a matter of time .. There will be a "regency" .. Yes Let's see if he will go to Moscow or not.
            Quote: uralant
            the son has not grown up yet.
        2. +8
          3 February 2017 18: 09
          I agree, even if he carries any nonsense, but in retirement and with the prefix EX. Got it already.
        3. WKS
          +33
          3 February 2017 18: 39
          A freebie is a familiar thing. Convenient. And the fact that this freebie for Lukashenko is pulled from the pockets of Russian citizens does not matter to him. The main thing is more. This is rudeness. It is necessary to dare the mustachioed from a free trough.
          1. +2
            3 February 2017 18: 57
            And they quickly get used to the freebie :-)
            1. +24
              3 February 2017 19: 38
              Quote: Nikolay Chernenko
              And they quickly get used to the freebie :-)

              Belarus is a small country and one of the few remaining allies.
              The most important stone in the CSTO and the EAEU - without it, that one, that the other is empty.
              And if you have to pay for this, then you have to pay.
              As many have noticed, no one wants to be friends with Russia for free. Maybe this is the legacy of the USSR?
              You can of course again shout glory to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Lavrov personally, but if in the end Belarus falls off, then Kazakhstan will leave 100% and where will we go?
              In splendid isolation, surrounded by enemies and all because of what?
              In Syria, then the loot can be driven without stopping, and native Belarus?
              Old man to the nobility? The Old Man has his own suits, but as you can see no one wants to love Russia for free - get used to the status of a superpower - the Americans have understood this for a long time and are pushing right and left - and they don’t bother.
              The behavior of Russia reminds me of the behavior of some fathers of drunks - who are not clear to whom they are ready to give their souls, but keep their family on a starvation ration and spread rot.
              Ukraine has already been lost, Georgia, all the countries of the former USSR, well, now Belarus remains to lose, and then what?
              In some cases, you have to pay for love or you have to be self-satisfied in solitude.
              1. +27
                3 February 2017 19: 47
                Quote: krass
                In some cases, you have to pay for love or you have to be self-satisfied in solitude.

                Thank you dear. I watch Belarus, we are becoming a country with low social responsibility. It seems to me that Uncle Vova will not pay for the hot, whiskered love.
                And about loneliness - Russia is not used to it, if we break it into anything, but RB will be swallowed along with the peel.
                1. +23
                  3 February 2017 19: 54
                  Quote: Winnie76
                  Thank you dear. I watch Belarus, we are now becoming a country with low social responsibility

                  Call it what you want, Syria damn ally and friend - where was it when Russia was hard? Can you remember at least one free orange from Syria in the 90s?
                  Maybe from Veresuela? Come from Iran?
                  But they are bowled and bowled without restriction.
                  And why not help Belarus?
                  Or now have to drive gas pipelines around Belarus?
                  If the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not know how to negotiate with its closest allies and brothers, it’s necessary to drive him with a filthy broom, and let all commentators of the type “LET FALL OUT” --- do you even understand what you are saying?
                  Quote: Winnie76
                  It seems to me that Uncle Vova will not pay for the hot, whiskered love.

                  well, the consequences will pay 10 times more.
                  1. +25
                    3 February 2017 20: 08
                    In Syria, the Russian Federation defends its interests. Why on earth should we “tower” in Belarus. Do we have something in return for this except rudeness? What for us such, such as the ally on whom it is impossible to rely on anything. The Union is not only rights, it is also a duty. I do not like it - with a tablecloth the road, forward, to Europe. There, Grandma Merkel will show how to love her homeland.
                    1. +6
                      3 February 2017 20: 36
                      She can and will show. And it won’t make it any easier for us. Get a united front from the Baltic to the Black Sea. As in the Second World War. Only if then partisaned on these lands, now they will go to us. It is unlikely to hold. Some garbage is going on.
                      1. Caa
                        +10
                        3 February 2017 20: 49
                        Quote: unwillingly
                        Only if then partisaned on these lands, now they will go to us. It is unlikely to hold. Some garbage is going on.

                        Believe me, they will be partisan.
                        True, there will be more policemen .. But, basically, with, “a young, young man))) Who will not be busy on toilets in Europe.
                      2. 0
                        5 February 2017 19: 41
                        Get a united front from the Baltic to the Black Sea.


                        Why are there no better allies like this, just a neighboring country. so it’s cheaper and you don’t need to be afraid of what will give to the one who offers the most.
                        Yanukovych is the most striking example.
                        Although this does not apply to Belarusians (ordinary people), although what can I say who the main one was chosen.
                    2. +8
                      4 February 2017 01: 00
                      Quote: Winnie76
                      In Syria, the Russian Federation defends its interests.

                      Of course, does Belarus mean there are no interests, or are they an order of magnitude lower than in Syria? belay
                      Quote: Winnie76
                      Why on earth should we “tower” in Belarus.

                      Because no one is closer than them. Just nobody. Or do you want to say that Syria, Venezuela. Iran is closer than Belarus?

                      Quote: Winnie76
                      What for us such, such as the ally on whom it is impossible to rely on anything

                      And who can you rely on?
                      Is love free? Will you love your power for free? I say power, and why others?
                      Quote: Winnie76
                      Union is not only rights, it is also duties

                      Of course, only Russia recognizes someone equal to it? No - that's why the responsibilities are different
                      Quote: Winnie76
                      I do not like it - with a tablecloth the road, forward, to Europe. There, Grandma Merkel will show how to love her homeland.

                      Ok, but 5 steps forward trying to think?
                      1. +2
                        4 February 2017 01: 28
                        And it’s enough to expose Russia in the form of a moron who wakes everyone up on his own and that's why everyone communicates with him. Enough.
                        We need to develop our country, that’s when a citizen of the Russian Federation will live 3 times better than a citizen of the Republic of Belarus, then maybe they will reach us. After all, everyone wants to live like in Europe, like nobody in Russia.
                        Russia is huge and great, we essentially do not need anyone, because we are fucked and strong. Ordinary trade and market relations, absolutely pragmatic - this is enough for Russia.
                        And about the war .. From the Republic of Belarus there will be zero sense, from the word in general. Like from the entire CSTO. Even if you imagine that nuclear weapons do not exist. The USA will pump us, both with RB and without. And we will win any regional conflict (if at least 0% of what our government tells us the truth).
                  2. +14
                    3 February 2017 20: 47
                    And Belarus in the 90s drove us everything for free !!!!! If there was anything !!! And yes, when we introduced food sanctions against the European Union, they suddenly got Belarusian ocean and sea fish started and citrus fruits started to grow! Lukashenko clearly sees his benefit and covers it with fraternal feelings. And as soon as the discount becomes a little less, everything at once Russia betrays the brothers !!!!
                    1. +4
                      4 February 2017 08: 20
                      Quote: Hyperborea
                      ! And yes, when we introduced food sanctions against the European Union, they suddenly got Belarusian ocean and sea fish started and citrus fruits started to grow!

                      No need to blame Belarus, first of all, the Russians themselves would support the sanctions and not buy shrimp from Belarus - then no one would drive anything.
                      Smuggling is the fulfillment of consumer demands of society - you eat and buy these shrimps, Belarusians shove them into their mouths by force.

                      Quote: Hyperborea
                      And as soon as the discount becomes a little smaller, Russia immediately betrays the brothers !!

                      no, he needs to survive and the country is the same.
                      Do not want to feed? He himself will not be able to, there will be fermentation among the people, Maidan, and where will Old Man run?
                      That's all, either you feed (if you want Belarus as an ally) or there is someone else who will feed it.
                      With their economies themselves, they cannot.
                      1. +3
                        4 February 2017 10: 24
                        Quote: krass
                        Smuggling is the fulfillment of consumer needs of a society

                        this is primarily a crime
                  3. +15
                    3 February 2017 20: 51
                    It’s simple .. then allies of Russia can’t be ... Either friends and partners, or enemies, there is no third! we’ll somehow live without them!
                    1. +5
                      3 February 2017 21: 14
                      Quote: Finches
                      It’s simple .. then allies of Russia can’t be ... Either friends and partners, or enemies, there is no third! we’ll somehow live without them!

                      Eugene, I’m very disappointed in you, I thought you would understand the whole background of this conflict, stretching back from the nineties, alas, patriotism has become inherent in you.
                      1. +15
                        3 February 2017 22: 41
                        To be objective, in this case there is an element of manipulation of our consciousness, through the presentation of one-sided and negative information about Belarus! I’m not making excuses, but I want to emphasize that if the Belarusian people calmly swallow Batsky’s such suits, then I’ll run into just such an attitude on our part! I’ll take the liberty of arguing for the majority’s opinion ... We have just studied this subject with Georgia, Moldova ... I do not say anything about Ukraine! Answer me the question - how long should Russia endure such tricks? Isn't it time to think about yourself, and not about the ever-aching "brothers" who in fact turn out to be traitors?
                        I am not a patriot! I began to get tired, proving that Ukrainians, Belarusians and Russian people are of the same root, that Moldavians, Georgians, Kazakhs, Azerbaijanis, Armenians ... are capable of prosperity only in one case - when together! If they do not want to understand this, is there any point in convincing them? Would it not be easier to concentrate on internal problems, where there are many more nationalities in need of help than all these independent republics? But there is one But - History! Which shows that all the above-mentioned peoples are not needed by anyone in the world and will begin to enslave them and then they will again begin to beg under the roof of Mother Russia and again the well-being of these peoples will be paid for with the tones of the blood of Russian Ivanov .... As always! Do we need it? hi
                      2. +5
                        4 February 2017 06: 43
                        And I don’t understand .. But shouldn't we look at ourselves? Why does Old Man behave like that? Yes, because some time ago, because of the selfish interests of the monopolies, they started to bend him ... Like Vysotsky’s: ".. we don’t need such a friend! "And who is needed? If not Belarus? Then we’ll bite our elbows ..
                        Quote: lis-ik
                        Quote: Finches
                        It’s simple .. then allies of Russia can’t be ... Either friends and partners, or enemies, there is no third! we’ll somehow live without them!

                        Eugene, I’m very disappointed in you, I thought you would understand the whole background of this conflict, stretching back from the nineties, alas, patriotism has become inherent in you.
                    2. +4
                      4 February 2017 01: 03
                      Quote: Finches
                      It’s simple .. then allies of Russia cannot be ... Either friends and partners, or enemies-the third is not given!

                      To be in proud loneliness.
                      Quote: Finches
                      Let stomp ass lick the Anglo-Saxons, but hurry, there is already such a queue gathered, you need to have time to win a place under the anus to conquer .., and we’ll somehow live without them!

                      You know, they won’t bother with this.
                      They will not change anything from this ---- and you?
                      So when you take a bribe back to your bureaucrats - this is normal, the solution to the problem is generally acceptable and everyone is familiar with it. But in the international arena (especially for the closest allies) - no.
                      It's funny to read all this.
                      1. +3
                        4 February 2017 06: 18
                        What does the bribe have to do with it? It is clear that the relations of states are different from the relations of neighbors in the stairwell, but it would be time to have the honor to know - to drive to another paradise! And then how to take the authorities at the expense of separation from Russia, so ahead of the rest, and how to pay for it, then immediately show off!
                  4. +8
                    3 February 2017 21: 38
                    Please tell me where Belarus was in the 90s, what exactly was the help of fraternal Belarus throughout the post-Soviet period?
                  5. +6
                    3 February 2017 22: 25
                    As if in the 90s Belarus delivered potatoes to us for free
                  6. +5
                    4 February 2017 02: 51
                    Quote: krass
                    Can you remember at least one free orange from Syria in the 90s?

                    So I don’t remember Belarusian potato, for free ...
                    Quote: krass
                    Do you understand what you’re saying?

                    Конечно.
                    Quote: krass
                    Or now have to drive gas pipelines around Belarus?

                    It will be necessary, a chase.

                    Quote: krass
                    If the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not know how to negotiate with its closest allies and brothers, it’s necessary to drive him with a filthy broom

                    Do you follow events at all?
                    Let me remind you: 2,5 years ago, Russia entered into a sanctions standoff with the EU. Reoriented its policy and economy towards this. And what did the “closest allies and brothers” do? Right! They immediately engaged in smuggling to the state. level. So who needs to be driven?
                    Quote: krass
                    well, the consequences will pay 10 times more.

                    So it will be the payment of ourselves, for ourselves. In the meantime, all these injections into the "allies" lead only to an increase in their appetites. And the sense of them ..? Ukraine out, only officially more than forty lard should. So what?
                    1. +2
                      4 February 2017 06: 52
                      Watch less shows with Kiselev. He’s doing some good work (for some reason he’s resting in Brussels), but what’s left in your head?
                      1. 0
                        4 February 2017 10: 25
                        Quote: 3danimal
                        Watch less shows with Kiselev. He then fulfills money well (for some reason he has a rest in Brussels)

                        do not envy
                    2. +2
                      4 February 2017 06: 57
                      Believe me, in comparison with the internal "thief rent," the costs of micro-allies are completely invisible.
                      It’s easy to be alone, it’s hard to restore relations. Emotions in international politics are a big weakness. Fortunately, there are not very many such people there)
                      1. +1
                        5 February 2017 14: 42
                        YES it’s enough to whine and impose such “allies” here. Like? Adopt and feed yourself.

                        It’s better to use this money to help state employees, pensioners and strengthen the country, than to throw it into the “abyss” in the form of supposedly fraternal people. Which also twists his nose.
                    3. +4
                      4 February 2017 07: 30
                      Look at the Humpty Dumpty case. Average Moscow officials, without bargaining, paid $ 10 million to preserve the anonymity of Internet correspondence. If there are 10-20 thousand of them in the country (which is likely), then the amount of "pocket" money will be $ 100-200 billion. The expenditure side of the budget of the Russian Federation for 2017 is $ 270 billion, the revenue side is $ 220 billion (deficit). These people are really eating up the country (infrastructure deterioration, for example), not spending on the main ally even $ 5 billion a year. They successfully distract people through TV: Belarus, Syria (why, by the way, not Somalia - it's high time), Geyropa, Obamka ..
                      And there is no need to dissuade, they say we will get rid of the allies, then we will deal with thieves. Firstly, there are no "you" as a subject. Here is a klepto-class in power. Secondly, they will quickly explain to you on the second point that there will be no repetition of the 37th year, and they will be distracted by something else. Well, then it’s for sure that we’ll deal with thieves. Etc )
                      1. 0
                        5 February 2017 14: 44
                        You have the slave’s thinking - “since there are bribes, then let everything be tied to bribes, and it’s not worth changing anything, it’s easier”
                  7. +2
                    4 February 2017 06: 46
                    You do not confuse the help of Belarus with the replenishment of Lukash’s pocket.
              2. +20
                3 February 2017 20: 05
                Quote: krass
                And if you have to pay for this, then you have to pay.

                For God's sake, pay, but out of your pocket, Russia’s treasury is not bottomless. Yes
                1. +7
                  3 February 2017 22: 31
                  one yacht less your oligarchs stand, that’s the price of helping Belarus .... naive people, they think something will fall if they press the Old Man.
                  1. +14
                    3 February 2017 22: 55
                    Quote: vasek5533
                    one yacht less your oligarchs stand, here is the price of help to Belarus ...

                    Oh e, and our oligarchs are nice people and do not give a ruble, not a dollar, not a cent. wink Everything comes from the poor Russian budget, dear, and you are a yacht, a yacht Yes
                  2. +3
                    4 February 2017 02: 57
                    Quote: vasek5533
                    one yacht less your oligarchs stand, that’s the price of helping Belarus .... naive people, they think something will fall if they press the Old Man.

                    It is very strange that you consider the yachts of the Russian oligarchs to be the property of Belarusian citizens. even we, Russian citizens, do not greet like that ... request
                  3. +9
                    4 February 2017 05: 16
                    Quote: vasek5533
                    one yacht less your oligarchs stand, here is the price of help to Belarus ..

                    You poor thing is ours, what a greedy Russia, just one help yacht. Is there a conscience?
                    This was reported in the press service of the Kremlin. “From 2011 to 2015, 18-23 million tons of oil were supplied duty-free to the republic. In total, during this period, the Russian budget received less than $ 22 billion 300 million, ”the press service noted, adding that“ all this is nothing but direct support from the Union State. ”

                    Source: http://politikus.ru/v-rossii/90189-rossiya-potery
                    ala-22-mlrd-dollarov-na-postavkah-nefti-v-belorus
                    siyu.html
                    Politikus.ru
                    1. +1
                      4 February 2017 12: 54
                      Hamsters will be thrown in, and they are glad to jump ... from what fright the budget did not receive? Everything was bought for money at an agreed price, there is no debt for the delivered goods. Well, let's guess ... they figured out how much the budget would have got if the price was world ... well, sorry if my grandmother had ...
                      The goods cost as much as they are ready to buy, there would be a world price, Belarus would not buy 23 million tons, and would buy half as much, but twice as much, that's all. The budget of the Russian Federation would receive the same money. What else 22 million ... and also as an option would be bought not from the Russian Federation at all. Because they buy from the Russian Federation, which is cheaper.
                      In short, you persecute Ukrainians that they have been brainwashed, but how you are washed is seen in the comments on this site.
                      1. +1
                        4 February 2017 14: 13
                        Quote: vasek5533
                        Everything was bought for money at an agreed price,

                        Vasek can't read?
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        delivered duty free

                        Vasek can't read? But it’s taken to speculate about someone’s brains ..? request
                  4. +1
                    5 February 2017 14: 45
                    Minus one yacht from the Russian oligarchs, plus one yacht from Lukashenko's entourage. What is the fundamental difference?
                2. +2
                  4 February 2017 08: 25
                  Quote: vovanpain
                  Quote: krass
                  And if you have to pay for this, then you have to pay.

                  For God's sake, pay, but out of your pocket, Russia’s treasury is not bottomless. Yes

                  If Belarus floats to the west - how much will Russia lose? Think about it.
                  1. 0
                    5 February 2017 14: 47
                    Then piss off.
              3. +3
                3 February 2017 20: 32
                I completely agree. Maybe this is part of the plan for the collapse of the Russian Federation. To provoke, turn all former allies into enemies. "Pragmatic politics" will not say anything
                1. 0
                  5 February 2017 14: 48
                  Friends should not be in the modern world (they will all betray), Russia should have only mutually beneficial relations (trade, military, etc.) and not one-sided, as it is now (and there is no sense and friendship, only expenses)
              4. Caa
                +27
                3 February 2017 20: 42
                Quote: krass
                Belarus is a small country and one of the few remaining allies.

                Suppose tomorrow NATO attacks Russia. Let everyone imagine the father’s behavior. Now I guess (maybe it will be so): "We are a small, peaceful, independent, neutral country. We’re not climbing anywhere, we are not touching anyone. Go all along the forest."

                The most important stone in the CSTO and the EAEU - without it, that one, that the other is empty.

                EAEU: why is RB so important here? Suppose Russia itself organizes the border in order to filter everything and everything.
                CSTO: at the moment, of course, is important. Purely like a buffer in which there is no READY infrastructure of the enemy. But, of course, there is no Russian one either ... So, if something happened: whoever got up first - that and slippers. And in 20-30 years with such development of armaments, there will not be much difference from these several hundred kilometers.

                And if you have to pay for this, then you have to pay.

                You have to pay. But, for something ..

                As many have noticed, no one wants to be friends with Russia for free. Maybe this is the legacy of the USSR?

                Firstly, they are “friends” - in principle, for free))) For money, these are other forms of relationships. And secondly, Russia is already paying: both directly and indirectly.
                The phrase about the heritage of the USSR-vile to shiver ..

                but if in the end Belarus falls off, then Kazakhstan will leave 100%

                Why suddenly ???

                In Syria means loot can be driven without stopping

                This is where the Arabs and the west loot drive without stopping. Russia is fighting terrorism there. And, to spend as much time during this time as she had spent on the Republic of Belarus - the Ishilovites would have shaved there, took St. George’s ribbons and went in line singing the Russian anthem.

                Americans have long understood this and are swinging right and left

                Everyone, like one, like a mantra, pronounces this phrase. Tell who and how much they bow. Do you even understand the true nature and motives of relationships, say, within NATO? Who do the states CONTAIN and support financially ??? What are you about??? Are you talking about those bases that belong to them? So RB refuses ...))) By the power of everyone they keep and wet dreams of a "tasty mammoth."

                The behavior of Russia reminds me of the behavior of some fathers of drunks - who are not clear to whom they are ready to give their souls, but keep their family on a starvation ration and spread rot.

                The truth is that Russia does see native people in Belarus. And only the blind do not see this. And does not recognize the hypocrite.

                Ukraine has already been lost, Georgia, all the countries of the former USSR, well, now Belarus remains to lose, and then what?

                Not lost, but released. There is a difference? Face it: Do you REALLY think that Russia could not keep any of the above ???

                In some cases, you have to pay for love or you have to be self-satisfied in solitude.

                You described a strange love. Not love at all. Such a surcharge is not necessary.
                1. +1
                  3 February 2017 21: 03
                  Quote: caa
                  Do you think that Russia could not keep any of the above ???

                  You, apparently, know more than others about what is happening in the AP and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation)
                  Judged by deeds, not imaginary possibilities and non-existent (dormant?) Forces. If a person has no friends, he often justifies this fact by the fact that there are no worthy people and in general, he does not need anyone (send all ...).
                  This is easier than recognizing the presence of problems in oneself (sociopathy, kleptomania, inconsistency, splitting of consciousness?).
                  1. +9
                    3 February 2017 21: 32
                    This is easier than recognizing the presence of problems in oneself (sociopathy, kleptomania, inconsistency, splitting of consciousness?).


                    Are you suffering from unsupported syndrome? Does the fate of the Russian people care? Are you startled by looking at the capital letter P? Wake up at night from the drone of a low flying airplane? Dr. Krasnoshtein is waiting for you at - Ul. Weizman 6, Tel Aviv
                    +972 3 697 3426
                    1. 0
                      4 February 2017 19: 58
                      As I understand it, in essence there is nothing to answer, only jokes)
                  2. Caa
                    +7
                    3 February 2017 21: 45
                    Quote: 3danimal
                    You, apparently, know more than others about what is happening in the AP and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation)

                    Where to me! An ordinary, modest person .. who knows what the globe is, and can compare Russia and the Baltic states, Russia and Georgia, Russia and Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, according to the list, according to various indicators.

                    If a person has no friends,

                    But it seemed to me that we were talking about states, about geopolitics .. Let’s talk about people: Putin is sure that he has a lot of friends. Useful info? And I have a lot. Not so useful, but also infa.
                    1. 0
                      4 February 2017 19: 56
                      Have you heard about the analogy?
                2. 0
                  5 February 2017 14: 50
                  Ltd. You have already started selling your friendship. And how much does it cost? Well, like a year. And if you pay for 5 years, will there be a discount on your "friendship"?
                  1. 0
                    19 March 2017 20: 52
                    You have already started selling your friendship.

                    You have nothing to say on the merits. There is a policy of a strong state (China, for example), but there is not a very strong one.
                    And nuclear weapons have nothing to do with it. The guard at the entrance to the headquarters can entertain himself with the thought as much as he could to beat the CEO in the ring.
              5. +26
                3 February 2017 21: 24
                In some cases, you have to pay for love or you have to be self-satisfied in solitude.


                You are kind, the road to Amsterdam, and the red light district. There you will pay for the love of all the colors of the rainbow, or maybe they will pay you something. And Russia is not a loving person. This is the pivot on which any people seeking security and self-identification can rely. They only need one thing, to follow the rules that the Russian, Russian people themselves follow. Nothing more. Therefore, gather your love in a fist, and go in peace where you were sent ......
                1. Caa
                  +5
                  3 February 2017 21: 47
                  Quote: Asadullah
                  And Russia is not a loving person. This is the pivot on which any people seeking security and self-identification can rely. They only need one thing, to follow the rules that the Russian, Russian people themselves follow. Nothing more.

                  And there is!
                  1. +3
                    3 February 2017 21: 58
                    And there is!


                    laughing I see you also drawn to send this drawn company of anxious?
              6. +4
                3 February 2017 22: 02
                For love, they usually pay girls of easy virtue and other keepers, and as you know, they very quickly change the object of love to a more profitable one.
              7. +1
                3 February 2017 23: 47
                I don’t agree, now America under Trump is going to stop paying the bills of her “allies”, and this despite the fact that she has a printing press and public debt as much as you want, especially the Russian Federation - the dad wants to get cheap oil, gas and loans, duty-free access to the market - do not force yourself, and if you want to be independent all this to yourself - pay like everyone else. The principle is simple and I'm glad that the GDP and the company began to apply it. It is pleasant that this one will start to stink and blame Russia for all mortal sins, but this is unlikely to add money to the budget. Why should Russia pay for some kind of ephemeral alliance? What did Lukash do good for us ?? Nothing at all
              8. +5
                4 February 2017 00: 53
                And what is the meaning of such a friendship? This is called not friendship but parasitism, no need to replace concepts! They never supported us at all, either in Syria or in the Crimea! From China there is more sense! Belarusians are brothers, of course, but it is impossible for our budget to keep everyone afloat! They need to change the management system, they strangled the whole business! There, surrounded by Luke, confusion and vacillations, everyone quietly rowing for themselves, waiting. The union crumbled without reforms in the economy, and Belarusians are apparently waiting for it ((
              9. +9
                4 February 2017 04: 05
                Quote: krass

                Belarus is a small country and one of the few remaining allies.

                Belarus has not supported Russia in any issue at the international level, it is completely unclear what is its allied role?
                1. 0
                  5 February 2017 14: 52
                  It’s just to be ... like friends, brotherly people, now it’s good to sell it :-) especially to any sentimental fools :-)
              10. SSR
                +2
                4 February 2017 05: 06
                Quote: krass
                In Syria, then the loot can be driven without stopping, and native Belarus?

                Syrian millions do not give sleep? Do Belarusian billions mean they also cry a tear? Justice from someone else's pocket cheeks breaks?
              11. +3
                4 February 2017 08: 19
                krass Yesterday, 19:38 ↑
                Quote: Nikolay Chernenko
                And they quickly get used to the freebie :-)


                Belarus is a small country and one of the few remaining allies.

                Belarus only in words an ally receives the cheapest oil, and according to the agreement, it delivers less fuel from its refineries than agreed (it is because of this that the Russian Federation drives it duty free, you live for a good deal, or what?). Abatka processes our oil and drives to the west;
                RB receives gas at the cheapest prices (you will not find cheaper), does not sell gas to anyone in the Russian Federation at such prices of the Russian Federation at any price, anyway, it manages to owe gas debt, what do you offer RB for free (non-renewable and) to give and still smile RB, and then take offense yet ...

                The most important stone in the CSTO and the EAEU - without it, that one, that the other is empty.

                What is the use of RB in the CSTO for the Russian Federation, if there is an agreement on joint defense, and the military infrastructure and bases of the Russian Federation on its territory does not allow the RB to deploy, how then can we prepare our countries for joint defense?
                EAC needs more RB so that loans can be obtained from EAC bank (Belarusians have already managed to get a few without investing a dime), the benefits of the Republic of Belarus in the EAC are its territory as a state bordering the EU, so the Republic of Belarus cannot (or does not want) to take control of counterfeit and sanctioned goods that goes through it in the Russian Federation ...
                Take the SCO as an example, there are no people in the country (only 6 states), the organization is purely economic, all the programs adopted are being successfully implemented ....

                And if you have to pay for this, then you have to pay.

                So you pay, I don’t want (like my parents - who paid for the entire social camp) to pay for the wives who are still doing bad things to you ...

                As many have noticed, no one wants to be friends with Russia for free. Maybe this is the legacy of the USSR?

                If we pay, then to developed countries that can at least teach us something, in the vast expanses of the former USSR I do not see a single country that can give us what we don’t have or what we ourselves can’t do ...

                You can of course again shout glory to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Lavrov personally, but if in the end Belarus falls off, then Kazakhstan will leave 100% and where will we go?
                In splendid isolation, surrounded by enemies and all because of what?


                We won’t stay if our Foreign Ministry had the same pro-programmatic approach to Belarus as it is now to Turkey, the current crisis would not exist ...
                The Republic of Belarus will fall off and to hell with it, we need to develop further, the Republic of Kazakhstan will not leave us, because we have more joint economic projects than with Belarus ...
                We are fighting in the SAR, so as not to fight on the territory of the Russian Federation ...

                Americans have long understood this and are chattering right and left - and they don’t bother.

                they are simple to anyone, so they don’t pay for anything and get what they want in return, unlike ours, who get only spit in response ...

                The behavior of Russia reminds me of the behavior of some fathers of drunks - who are not clear to whom they are ready to give their souls, but keep their family on a starvation ration and spread rot.

                not a correct comparison, for the Russian Federation, the family is its peoples who inhabit it, and not the former republics of the USSR ...
                or forgot how the “family members” raised their hands on their father in the early 90s and said that they would be better off in a non-native home and that strangers would shelter them?

                Ukraine has already been lost, Georgia, all the countries of the former USSR, well, now Belarus remains to lose, and then what?

                I don’t think that the Russian Federation lost them, it’s they lost part of their territories (I think they’ll lose in the future, one - Adjara, the other the entire right-bank Ukraine), the "children" have chosen their own path, let them go their own way, they will come to their senses if they can, they can always to return back (another thing is whether the children in the Russian Federation recognize their children, this is another question ...)

                In some cases, you have to pay for love or you have to be self-satisfied in solitude.

                As long as we have money, we won’t be alone, contradict ourselves, you have to pay Belarus and then it will be an ally, and if we pay Germany or Italy, they will not be our allies? It’s better to pay more to Italy, but at least we’ll get the normal technology and production (for example: Italians buy gas at the price that goes to Belarus, and they will build refineries for us in Russia).
                RB is not the case for which you have to pay, especially not getting anything in return ...
              12. +2
                4 February 2017 10: 55
                Only whores are paid for love, but they tear them for it without stopping in all the cracks. And they are generally allowed to open their mouths only to please the one who bought them.
              13. 0
                4 February 2017 16: 07
                Quote: krass
                Belarus is a small country and one of the few remaining allies.
                The most important stone in the CSTO and the EAEU - without it, that one, that the other is empty.
                And if you have to pay for this, then you have to pay


                I agree with you! I am sure that Belarus will remain with us. And its loss is generally unacceptable - and so Ukraine was lost. Belarus is the most important bridgehead in the western direction - by the way, the most dangerous one - where the pressure comes from and practically the offensive of Europe with its eternal wrangling. In addition, Belarus was able to preserve all the high-tech industries and the scientific, technical and human potential - Belomo optics (arguing with Zeiss) are installed on all the space technology of the Russian Federation, tractors, even washing machines, elevators and refrigerators - than it’s better to buy Korean Chinese from your own all the same - feed your a common economic space than someone else’s - the more potential opponents



                Quote: krass
                if in the end Belarus falls off, then Kazakhstan will leave 100% and where will we go?



                I am absolutely sure that the KZ will not “fall off” even if Belarus leaves - historically and geopolitically, our fate is the same with Russia - a single large market is always better than a small one and economically more profitable - and it’s impossible or unacceptable for us to integrate into the Chinese or European market. KZ in general is the "center" of Eurasia and the great steppe, like Tatarstan with the Bashkirs - if anyone "falls off", it’s rather the west of Russia - the same St. Petersburg - and the Great Steppe is the "last line of defense"

                Quote: krass
                Ukraine has already been lost, Georgia, all the countries of the former USSR, well, now Belarus remains to lose, and then what?


                I agree with your attitude to the issue - but I wanted to say that not everything is so bad. Fortunately, instead of a team of Eltsin’s liberalists who denied all our republic’s initiatives to integrate into the EAC, new Russian leaders came, who finally turned to the “west back and to us” and realized that Central Asia is not a “yoke” and Kazakhstan is the same people as in Russia

                Starting with the 3 republics, the EAC already unites 5. And tomorrow Moldavians and Tajiks will come, and Turkmens will also come 100%, and maybe even the Mongols if we agree with China - It has already been many times - Eurasia has been "killed" many times - but it has risen every time in even greater greatness like a Phoenix bird from the ash.
                I am sure that even the same Georgians will come to their senses tomorrow and ask for us. Azerbaijan, of course, will not come now - but this is conjuncture - but in fact the peoples of the Great Steppe (the core of Eurasia) are as close relatives to them as the Turks - but in fact it may be closer

                In general, I’m not going to be lost, I think - and Belarus will stay with us - and these are just everyday conflicts in a communal apartment - the Old Man will scold and then make peace
                1. 0
                  5 February 2017 14: 58
                  Another lover of feeding all kinds of ragged people at the national expense.
            2. +14
              3 February 2017 21: 48
              "Not a single Russian person, not a single Russian will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia"


              No one thinks so. They just see that Lukashenko is a rude, overly impudent blackmailer. And he is hiding behind the Belarusian people as hostages.
            3. +1
              4 February 2017 03: 00
              In order for the average citizen to live in Russia 3 times better than a resident of Belarus, you need to stop spending money on a Syrian adventure and significantly reduce military spending. Which of the regulars of VO will agree to such a "betrayal"?
              1. +5
                4 February 2017 04: 09
                Not before the Izgail leaves all the territories he has seized, and the area of ​​US national interests is limited to the territory of the USA itself
              2. +4
                4 February 2017 07: 35
                Quote: Matak
                , you need to stop spending money on the Syrian adventure and significantly reduce military spending.

                Israel... laughing Who about what, and lousy about a bath about a bath ... laughing
                Quote: Matak
                "betrayal"

                Betrayal is to give similar advice in Russian from under the Israeli flag. Notice, on the Russian resource, to Russian citizens ... This is a betrayal. Yes
              3. 0
                4 February 2017 08: 32

                0
                Matak Today, 03:00 ↑


                Quote: Matak
                In order for the average citizen to live in Russia 3 times better than a resident of Belarus, you need to stop spending money on a Syrian adventure and significantly reduce military spending. Which of the regulars of VO will agree to such a "betrayal"?


                I partially agree with you. ATS must be tied, but also controversial, because We were promised bases on its territory and agreements have been signed on their placement for 49 years.
                Regarding armaments, one can partially agree, because the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation receive only what they did not receive in the period from 1991 to 2010, after 2020 the delivery of the VT BT will go into its usual direction ...

                Yes, and do not "turn on the stupid ... go" Israel its military spending every year only increases https://regnum.ru/news/polit/1866682.html

                So without the "good" advice, the Russian Federation will sort it out somehow
          2. +3
            3 February 2017 22: 38
            When this "freebie" ends, the citizens of Russia at best will not feel anything, but most likely will get worse. Almost everything that is sold in the Russian Federation is assembled from Russian components or raw materials. Then tell the workers of the Yaroslavl motor, when they stop making engines for MAZ, how you pressed the dad and now everyone will heal.
            1. +4
              4 February 2017 07: 44
              Quote: vasek5533
              when they stop making engines for MAZ, how did you press the dad and now everyone will heal.

              One more indispensable ... I remember, I remember, "they don’t have enough brains or money," and "Mos ... ali ate our fat." It was also, "we feed the whole union, they will crawl to our knees," but they even calmed down, you see, they are tired of waiting until we crawl.
            2. +3
              4 February 2017 08: 41
              vasek5533
              Then tell the workers of the Yaroslavl motor, when they stop making engines for MAZ, how you pressed the dad and now everyone will heal.


              I almost shed a tear, or is it that engines at the Yaroslavl plant only do MAZ engines? And why, do you think that the Yaroslavl plant will stop supplying engines to MAZ? If the Republic of Belarus is ready to pay, why not supply, we have a market economy, demand creates supply, and the other thing is that in Yaroslavl they can refuse to produce engines for MAZ, because of low profitability, this is possible ....

              And how will it become worse for me personally because the Russian Federation will cease to sell public property at lower prices than other states, where is the logic, what financial college did you graduate from?
            3. 0
              6 February 2017 10: 36
              We have already heard similar things from Ukraine, such as Russia without Ukraine will die out of hunger and generally fall apart, because Ukrainians are irreplaceable and feed the whole of Russia.
              Now it turns out that Belarus feeds and supports all of Russia, millions of Russians go to Belarus to earn money.

              You vasek5533 on the Maidan did not ride?
        4. SSR
          +9
          3 February 2017 18: 46
          Quote: cniza
          Aged, handed over, it's time to retire.

          And more recently, many Luke set an example .....
          In fact, it’s really normal for the coffin, so many leaders wouldn’t be too smart .... but with his tantrums he really turned many away from him and those who looked through his three-seat seat through his fingers now start to look contemptuously at the neoo ...
          In general, I agree with you ... he still has a chance to go to the cottage with dignity and the label "Old Man" of Belarusians.
        5. +2
          3 February 2017 19: 51
          Quote: cniza
          Aged, handed over, it's time to retire.

          Moreover, care needs complete control!
        6. +14
          3 February 2017 20: 06
          Three years ago, I posted here that Lukashenko was a political prostitute, caught a hundred or so minuses .. fellow
          1. +1
            4 February 2017 08: 44
            Quote: INVESTOR
            INVESTOR Yesterday, 20:06 ↑
            Three years ago, I posted here that Lukashenko was a political prostitute, caught a hundred or so minuses ..


            It’s just that you’re respected then, you didn’t feel the whole political moment, you didn’t read the periodicals (official), but now it's time to signal ...
        7. +3
          3 February 2017 20: 40
          Quote: cniza
          Aged, handed over, it's time to retire.

          Come on, I recently held the hockey championship and became the best goalkeeper, full of strength and energy.
          1. +3
            3 February 2017 20: 51
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            and became the best goalkeeper

            Disclaimer, top scorer.
      2. +28
        3 February 2017 17: 47
        Exactly, father did play the "cool" leader, and probably felt like a celestial. This is a direct road to the neighbors to Yanukovych. And if he also flirts with the West, then to Gaddafi with Hussein.
        1. +7
          3 February 2017 18: 06
          The first president of the Republic of Belarus from 1994 to the present = 22 years !!!!
          He has been in office for the longest time among all European heads of state (except for monarchs). laughing
      3. +4
        3 February 2017 17: 49
        He really will not live to see Rostov. Tear it up.
      4. +16
        3 February 2017 18: 00
        When it is impossible to boast of economic achievements, social tension grows, and an “external enemy” is needed.
      5. +9
        3 February 2017 18: 14
        But there is no need for such lengthy discourses. .. and the prostitute this Old Man. Everything.
      6. +24
        3 February 2017 18: 14
        The Old Man has an aggravation. As soon as Putin transferred Old Man's economic cries from political relations to economic Old Man became nervous. Now he can’t speculate - I admit Crimea is Russian under such conditions .... I got the answer - go take a walk in the field and you may not recognize it. Twitched. Although Russia is tired of listening to the promises of His Majesty Belarus.
        1. +10
          3 February 2017 19: 32
          Old Man even bargains for recognition of the Crimea, but when does Crimea recognize the territory of Russia the same Gref?
          1. +2
            3 February 2017 19: 40
            Gref does not have to. May create a child structure. Why is he not doing this is already a question? Sberbank may somehow formally circumvent the sanctions.
          2. +3
            3 February 2017 20: 38
            Hurray patriots try not to notice this little misunderstanding.
        2. +8
          3 February 2017 19: 45
          You dear commentators are ruining Russia with these actions. You are no different from Ukrainian football fans.
          1. 0
            4 February 2017 08: 47
            Quote: Kohl
            Kolya Yesterday, 19:45 ↑
            You dear commentators are ruining Russia with these actions. You are no different from Ukrainian football fans.


            Kolya!? And why without a father in Canada?
      7. +13
        3 February 2017 18: 15
        Quote: vovanpain
        In addition to Russian cheap loans, as well as cheap oil and gas, military equipment, and even more, more cheaply, and other nishtyaks, yes it doesn’t. wink

        He always had words in his campaign speeches about integration with Russia, now let him bite his elbows, it's too late, there was nothing to do with populism. To be honest, Putin’s actions are clear, he is not interested in Belarus as a union state, but needs a republic as a part of Russia. But just what is the point is not clear? Russia won nothing if instead of Belarus there would be a part of the Russian Federation.
        By the way, the article does not mention the reasons why Russia regained border control with Belarus.
        1. +35
          3 February 2017 18: 28
          About border control, everything is simple: Belarus unilaterally canceled visas with a bunch of countries, and with us the border is absolutely transparent, without control - that’s the minimum control introduced. We don’t need to let US citizens fly to Minsk without a visa and enter Russia without control.
          In Belarus itself, border guards on the Russian-Belarusian border have been working for a long time, but no one has made a fuss about it!
        2. +13
          3 February 2017 18: 29
          Quote: MyVrach
          By the way, the article does not mention the reasons why Russia regained border control with Belarus

          Old Man took out European and Ukrainian goods for Belarusian to issue and import duty-free into the Russian Federation. He was warned for two years to tie
        3. Caa
          +11
          3 February 2017 19: 42
          Quote: MyVrach
          Russia won nothing if instead of Belarus there would be a part of the Russian Federation.


          Well, you give!)))
          Will win in everything! Both Russia and Belarusians. S t.z. defense - there’s nothing to say even - some advantages. Even purely economically, this is a much better solution: we are economically, like "two puzzles" - ideally suited, just divorced a little apart.

          The market is becoming truly common, including the energy one - our enterprises will be able to operate at the level of yours, i.e. no need to kick people out. At the same time, many freebies that Belarusians are used to are canceled. And there remains a small budget deficit, certainly less support needed now. No matter how here (in Belarus) everything may be bent, but in the natural environment (when combined) - it will live normally.
        4. +2
          3 February 2017 20: 42
          Quote: MyVrach
          By the way, the article does not mention the reasons why Russia regained border control with Belarus.

          They are discussed in the comments to another article. This is a reaction to visa-free travel for 80 states in Belarus. Well, now it’s possible to consider this as part of the war between us. They probably already knew about his plans when they made a decision.
        5. +2
          3 February 2017 22: 45
          Russia won nothing if instead of Belarus there would be a part of the Russian Federation.


          Old Men and Putin come and go ... But if NATO settles on the territory of Belarus and Ukraine, such a failure of foreign policy cannot be corrected by two Crimea and five Syria. And then either you have to spend the last shirt on the army, or tighten your tail and turn everything in, turning into lackeys and a raw materials appendage.
      8. +1
        3 February 2017 18: 59
        https://news.tut.by/economics/530200.html
        1. +1
          4 February 2017 08: 53
          Quote: Vladislav

          1
          Vladislav Yesterday, 18:59 ↑
          https://news.tut.by/economics/530200.html


          Expensively "soyuznichki" ("bros") cost the Russian Federation.
          The enemy regime in Ukraine threw us $ 3 billion, and the allied Belarus - over 28 ...
          With such "allies" and enemies do not need
          1. +2
            4 February 2017 08: 57
            Quote: commbatant
            The enemy regime in Ukraine threw us $ 3 billion, and the allied Belarus - more than 28.

            You still do not know about Venezuela wink
      9. +2
        3 February 2017 20: 25
        It will feed you Belarusians, when you will swell from hunger
      10. 0
        4 February 2017 10: 32
        There is a place. Near me, the building plot is free.
      11. 0
        4 February 2017 22: 46
        Quote: vovanpain
        Dad do not go too far



        Firstly, Old Man, not Dad.

        And secondly, already just the stepfather!
    2. +15
      3 February 2017 17: 46
      Quote: antikilller55
      We do not get into brothersIf you want to leave, go on your own, just don’t get burned on it.

      A fundamentally wrong thesis!
      We are by blood Brothers.
      1. +35
        3 February 2017 17: 53
        We have blood brothers to a fig and more, just something in difficult times, these brothers can’t be seen.
        While it is profitable - BROTHERS, and if suddenly it is not profitable - then already, it seems, no ....
        1. +19
          3 February 2017 18: 02
          again, people are confused with power.
          1. +12
            3 February 2017 18: 31
            That's it - substitutes its people.
            "Another victim of the Kremlin!" - that’s what they will begin to sing in the West. At such a moment, when the support of the allies is important ... it's like a knife in the back. Does the LAS not understand this? Since 2010, according to the Government of the Russian Federation, assistance was provided in the amount of $ 25 billion. And really because of the debt of half a billion. - maybe he sniffed with Poros !? Some sequence is traced. And who is interestingly offered help (promised) to the LAS - he is implicated in such tricks.
            Pigs there are satisfied with the slaughter and such a gift to Russophobes in the West is a stupid and stupid act. Short-term gain - and tomorrow what !? The West can give cheap oil and gas or transit and attendants for it? The LAS itself climbs into the loop and drags the whole of Belarus - Kiev is an example of this with the Baltic states.
            It will turn out a belt of "alienation" from the Baltic to the Black Sea - to which Russophobes sought. And how does the LAS not understand this - and also declares that "no one will believe" that Belarus can turn west ?! is he fool who wants to hang noodles - the GDP with NAS will not be forgiven - he is not afraid of this !? hi
            The Kremlin today or tomorrow will brainwash and LAS will be like silk. Enrages such blackmail - little Piglets provocation, so more ... Punish the same GDP - at world prices tomorrow gas, oil will buy Belarus - Lag is like !? And not for rubles, for currency.
            1. +1
              3 February 2017 19: 12
              But father himself claims that he lost 15 yards in the union.

              Lukashenko did well, if NAS had not been so toothless, what good would have come out of taiga integration.
              In general, I think it will be very funny if he is thrown out of the EAEU just like from the USSR. = D
              1. +3
                4 February 2017 16: 13
                "Friends in a difficult moment are known." I would fill such a friend’s face and forget it.
                He, like a problem, is the whole Union in the subject. He wrote that one call from the Kremlin, and the LAS gives an interview for 7 hours and excuses itself - well, what kind of first person is it in the country !? A man or a rag? What good fellow is he? He signed the papers himself - the energy market since 2025. - so why beg and throw tantrums with blackmail. Subscribed - responsible for the "bazaar" - otherwise what kind of man are you !? I’m not going to block the GDP, but it’s clear that Belarus is hanging on the neck of the Russian Federation, and not vice versa. The mistake of the LAS that it does not carry out reforms and privatization of unprofitable enterprises - the Republic of Belarus is not self-sufficient, so the problems of a planned economy will be pulled back.
                Integration, what do you think brings, what is the benefit for ordinary citizens? For me it's a competition. "Agashkam" does not squeeze superprofits from the people. That's all. You know the examples yourself and it makes no sense to give. And so - well, there will be all sorts of monopolists to milk us - what good !? And politics is here at least comrade. Xi Sadi, even Putin - there will be no changes for the common people - "agashki" quickly assimilate laughing .
                But where does the Lag go with the vehicle? Well, instead of 130 bucks, he will pay all 200 in rubles, but in currency - now he will run away, yeah, he’ll just run away! Kiev and Minsk showed that these Bialowieza Agreements are a toilet paper. Where will he sell his tractors and combines, refrigerators and telly with "seafood"? Russia had to immediately immerse them in independence and in the market at world prices - let them get out. But no, they themselves broke up with subsidies and discounts - now we disentangle. If she had acted like with us and Central Asia - now they would look into the mouth of the GDP that Kiev, that Minsk - every penny of discounts would be happy. hi
                These are the thoughts, Zymran. We stand together - single-handedly pit us (see relations along the perimeter of the old Union), because The Union is a force with which neither the East nor the West can cope - to respect and be reckoned with (that’s what makes you bleed).
                1. 0
                  4 February 2017 18: 28
                  If you do not remember, then the father of the National Academy of Sciences with GDP was almost kicked into this alliance.
                  Has integration brought much benefits for ordinary citizens? Yeah, be patient a little. Nothing but screwing up, violation of civil liberties, wild fines of idiotic laws and taxes. All this under the roof of the Russian Federation. Such as you can play up a new union, rejoice in the success of the separatists, etc. but your time is running out. The ruling regime will collapse, and all the idiocy he has undertaken will dissipate.
                  1. +2
                    4 February 2017 22: 15
                    It’s impossible to understand you. The Old Man, whom you praise so much, remains the last bastion of socialism in the post-Soviet space — in your opinion, it’s 100% “Sov.ok”! I just criticize him that it is impossible to maintain such a system in such a state without outside help. Well, how not to laugh, Cheslovo!
                    Come on, you react so viciously. I approach from the point of view of logic and development of the country and no more. And you need to steer the GDP here - leave this theory of "Putinism" ?! He has one task - to have friendly countries around the perimeter, which corresponds to our foreign policy tasks.
                    Just the same time, the unification is coming. Look at the western republics. Argue and what better to live? Economics is a science. If there were necessary resources for development in V. Europe, there are no questions. But they are not there and it is possible to take cheaper (for one reason or another) only with us (RF + RK + CA). It’s not my fault. And the latest events clearly demonstrate their dependence on the large market of the Russian Federation. After all, this is also important for us, for our villagers - or how !? So why sit and frown? Therefore, based on the initial data, V. Europe (incl. Western) needs us. Therefore, everyone will climb to "fraternize" for GDP - do not go to a fortuneteller .... On the other hand. According to statistics ... more than 40 countries go to have a vehicle mode with us - so whose time is running out, why is it necessary to “close”, if there are advantages, do you need to use it !?
                    I also concluded that Ukraine would not be able to live economically without separatist militias. Isn’t that so? GDP did not deceive when it talked about annual subsidies of $ 9 billion - this is evident in Ukraine.
                    From the collapse and revolutions, as we see, nothing good. Countryman, well, one will be replaced, the next will come - what will change !? He will have his own cockroaches in his head - do not go to a fortuneteller. One "idiocy" will change for another - and that’s it !!! There (in power) the evolution that goes on for generations is important. Do you want a Western-style democracy - this will not happen, is there a different mentality ?! We need to build our own, but this in time ... hi
                    Leave this anger - we are not going to swear here, but to express our point of view and why so, and not otherwise. Good luck
                    1. +1
                      4 February 2017 22: 49
                      Countryman, here is my view on the development of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Well, let it be your way. We are leaving the Union. We are closing. Now think about the transfer of power. At Turkmen, etc. .. And look at the behavior of the beloved granddaughter. He doesn’t even have any upbringing - his parents were definitely not up to him. When was it that the young publicly discussed the elders, and even blamed them? I completely lost the coast. That is why it will break to power, as ... you yourself know who - there will be enough money and resources. We will get a situation that we want to avoid. Isolation will only lead to more authoritarianism and cult. The union ... there is someone to point out the shores and decency to send observers to the elections. Isolation will ultimately lead to the fact that there will be no elections ... - the family will decide everything without them. How do you like that? Many things do not suit me, but evolution is needed, but not revolution. Something like this. hi
          2. +4
            3 February 2017 18: 46
            Quote: uralant
            again, people are confused with power.


            And I'm not talking about people and power, I'm talking about the state. And I don’t confuse anything.
            As you yourself imagine, in general, to separate people and power. That the Ukrainian people can throw off their power by hostility to support the fraternal people? I don’t think so.
          3. +2
            4 February 2017 08: 56
            Quote: uralant
            uralant Yesterday, 18:02 ↑
            again, people are confused with power.


            Old Man seems not to be an emirator, people like him elected, loans allocated by the RF one way or another went to the whole people of the Republic of Belarus, one way or another to the detriment of the people of the Russian Federation ...
            1. +1
              4 February 2017 09: 00
              Quote: commbatant
              loans allocated to the Russian Federation one way or another went to the whole people of Belarus, one way or another to the detriment of the people of the Russian Federation ...

              Credit cannot be to the detriment
              implies a REFUND of money with interest.
              wink
              1. +3
                4 February 2017 10: 27
                Quote: krass
                mk
                implies a REFUND of money with interest.

                this is you hohlam tell
          4. 0
            4 February 2017 14: 22
            Quote: uralant
            again, people are confused with power.

            Flesh from the flesh ... request
          5. 0
            4 February 2017 22: 49
            Quote: uralant
            again, people are confused with power.


            Unfortunately, decisions are not made by the PEOPLE, but by rulers from power!
        2. 0
          3 February 2017 22: 50
          This, well, very distant relatives.
      2. +6
        3 February 2017 18: 00
        We are BROTHERS by blood.

        Here, some owners of Russian mineral resources adhere to the thesis:
        The Russian and Belarusian people are brothers, I love taking them from me ... feel
        1. +6
          3 February 2017 18: 37
          Quote: yuriy55
          We are BROTHERS by blood.

          Here, some owners of Russian mineral resources adhere to the thesis:
          The Russian and Belarusian people are brothers, I love taking them from me ... feel


          No need to juggle.
          Not to you and not to me from the bowels of the Nothing falls and will not fall.
          One must always remain human.
          1. +6
            3 February 2017 19: 11
            It falls into us. And not sour. It’s worth remembering the fat years until 2008. No fairy tales. If you personally haven’t transferred to your account a certain amount with the signature “from oil and gas to fellow citizens” this is no reason to judge like that. Considering that HALF of citizens, at least, evade taxes and fees - we live in a magnificent country where it is not clear what money they are doing something.
            1. +1
              3 February 2017 22: 40
              Quote: ytsuken
              Considering that HALF of citizens, at least, evades taxes and fees by all means - we live in a magnificent country where it is not clear what money they are doing.

              If they do not shy away, they will give back everything they earned and still have to pay extra, earning on the side, for the honor of doing business. I mean the production, not the mining of diamonds. Verified on many ruined friends.
              1. 0
                4 February 2017 08: 59
                Quote: DMB84
                DMB84 Yesterday, 22:40 PM ↑
                Quote: ytsuken
                Considering that HALF of citizens, at least, evades taxes and fees by all means - we live in a magnificent country where it is not clear what money they are doing.

                If they do not shy away, they will give back everything they earned and still have to pay extra, earning on the side, for the honor of doing business. I mean the production, not the mining of diamonds. Verified on many ruined friends.


                why then you demand from the Party and the Government, evade further ...
                1. 0
                  4 February 2017 14: 00
                  Quote: commbatant
                  why then you demand from the Party and the Government, evade further ...

                  A weak party and government to create sane taxes? Not on the principle of "still not blame", but on the basis of common sense? Who will be involved in the production, if in the end they select the latter? commbatant, probably you have never tried to do business. I mean honest business. Here we have one pension fund worth what. It has practically nothing to do with pensioners. He is "non-state". That is, the pension fund raises money for the needs of the pension fund. To guide the pension fund. From the state there is not only no help to the production workers, but in my opinion there is a certain unspoken rule - everything that does not engage in petty trade is strangled by all means. in fact, this is how it happens.
          2. +5
            3 February 2017 19: 19
            The more accurate the calculation, the more reliable the friendship!

            an old saying by the way.
    3. +20
      3 February 2017 17: 49
      Lukashenko flashed something in the media with statements of dubious adequacy. This is not good.
    4. +7
      3 February 2017 17: 50
      As always, Old Man picks up a difficult moment for Russia to squeeze his penny.
      Before that, he did it, it's time to put an end to it.
      Only he has nowhere to go, but he can spoil.
    5. +5
      3 February 2017 17: 53
      Brothers Belarusians, clarify, there are people on the site
      1. +41
        3 February 2017 18: 04
        Clarity? There is a slave to power at the helm of the country, who is not able to leave voluntarily, even if the whole Belarusian people get sick of this, and who has not been conducting any dialogue with the general public for a long time. If there is a question, whether Belarusians own power or the welfare of the Belarusians, power will be unambiguously chosen.
      2. +13
        3 February 2017 18: 25
        Quote: sined0707
        Brothers Belarusians, clarify, there are people on the site

        Russia defends its interests, and Lukashenko is offended that they no longer reckon with his interests. The republic’s economy is strongly connected with Russia, and now Lukashenko has no choice but to speak, and then go again to beg. After all, gas was never found in the republic crying
        1. 0
          15 February 2017 14: 24
          Thanks for the answer
      3. Caa
        +40
        3 February 2017 18: 32
        Quote: sined0707
        Brothers Belarusians, clarify, there are people on the site


        Fills the price. Only this time almost all-in goes.
        He was not in vain blaming the entire conference for Russia. Belarusian news look: constantly all around are to blame. Or specifically at someone points a finger at meetings, or accuses neighbors, or citizens in general.

        There are only two solutions: either we’ll agree or not. If we agree, you will be paid again. If not, then, as usual, there will be a "turn to the west" to strengthen its position.

        That's just, apparently, this time the position will have to not only be strengthened, but really give in to the West. And what? Belarusians still consider Europe a paradise on Earth. Ask anyone, he will say that it is better to live in Europe. The average Belarusian will not think about issues of geopolitics, defense, etc. Moreover, the majority really believes that you can join the EU, but at the same time be the closest, most fraternal people with Russia. At the level of an ordinary person, this is how it is: as relatives travel to each other, they will. As they spoke in Russian, they will be so. A certain awareness will come only at the last moment, when the abrams will begin to unload near Mogilev.

        Therefore, the Old Man can go all-in quietly. Tear all ties with Russia, blame her for everything, will announce a rapprochement with the West. And everyone will support. Just from the fact that no one thinks what this means. Everyone will have an open Europe in their head (visa-free travel, as they like to say in Ukraine), cheap goods, the opportunity to go live / study, work in Europe. At the same time, the Russian direction in the consciousness of the Belarusian will be unchanged: we are one people, my relatives, friends, etc. are there.

        And when the perpetrators are identified, the masses approve of the direction, then the guilt for all the consequences is removed! And the consequences can come in a year or five. At the same time they will constantly pour into their heads, saying: “You yourself wanted to Europe? You wanted. I tried to dissuade you for many years? I tried to dissuade. But, you should know that Russia threw us, encroached on independence ..” and so on and so forth .

        At the same time, some goodies for guidance:
        - no fault
        - no liability
        - the West loves and does not threaten prison
        - the fifth column disappears (and who are they now ???)
        - the masses are in confusion (they themselves are to blame) and no seething
        - The remnants of the country can be instantly grabbed to the tune of European integration.

        All chocolate!
        1. +7
          3 February 2017 18: 57
          Answer to 5 points
        2. 0
          15 February 2017 14: 29
          Thank you for the detailed answer, I agree, "answer 5 points"
    6. 0
      3 February 2017 20: 33
      Quote: antikilller55
      We don’t get into brothers, you want to leave, go yourself, just don’t get burned on this.

      And Belarus will leave - to China. And Russia will remain with a nose.
      1. +3
        3 February 2017 23: 23
        Chu, they’ll dig a tunnel to China under Russia in order to go there.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +1
      3 February 2017 21: 42
      All,. friendship dad like smoke dissipated!
    9. 0
      3 February 2017 21: 58
      Before the election, bets were made in the USA. Trump won.
      At the rates of the Russian Federation should (apparently) receive a prize - BSSSR. The decision was made at the highest level - bankers divided the feed base.
      Zhirik voiced loudly and before him there were reports of this.
      In Nuland, it only organized (by order from above) polarization, for an objective assessment of the forces of the parties (traded and quoted on the world stage).
      Who is capable of capturing and holding, including without an Army, only chatter and promises.
      Comrades for work !!!
      Lukashenko does not see in this section a place for independent states in the CIS (BSSSR), in particular Belarus.
      How do you like this gift?
      25 years ago, he read with Solovyov (or others): “Russia was given to possess the colony — the wild Asia of the Slovak Republic and ... XXXX, they’re not allowed into Europe, they howl about barbarians” - not verbatim
      Doctrines of 1850 - preparation for the Crimean War
      And give the Western Hemisphere (Monroe Doctrine).
      And with the influence of China, "fight yourself"
      The main thing is that the growth of dough in Chinese banks is faster. than in Western countries (is Stol yeast better?) We need to protect our markets.
    10. 0
      4 February 2017 07: 27
      Then one such fourth year spits towards Russia, turning its own country into a battlefield. Kaby, so as not to repeat the path of a neighbor.
  2. +8
    3 February 2017 17: 35
    There you and my friend’s road ....
    1. +6
      3 February 2017 18: 51
      Quote: Lyncher
      There you and my friend’s road ....

      Lukash is already old and not far off is the time when he himself will leave the helm. And if he doesn’t want / cannot leave behind pro-Russian power, Belarus will very quickly turn into one more a country of Euro-integrating Russophobia - a fact.
      What then will Russia remain against the entire Western world? Kazakhstan, but with Nazarbayev, everything is far from smooth.
      There is still friendship against America with China, but there is a double-edged sword. Today, China benefits one thing, and tomorrow it’s completely different, and there are plenty of forces in the Middle Kingdom, it resembles a game with fire.
      “Russia has only two allies: its army and navy.” (Alexander 3), only time is now such that one is not a warrior in the field and Russia is in no position to scatter allies.
      1. +8
        3 February 2017 19: 26
        I would say three allies: Army, Navy and VKS.
        Russia does not have and did not have allies that will fit into all hands and the situation.
        All our allies and friends are temporary until they become hot or the interests and mutual benefits end.
      2. +5
        3 February 2017 19: 32
        Quote: Großer Feldherr
        Russia is not in a position to scatter allies.

        Yes, what is an ally, do not tell. Selling for 30 shekels and does not blink an eye. Let it bring down Europe, maybe our illusions will diminish among our patriots.
        1. +6
          3 February 2017 19: 56
          I would remember dad how he sold PU from C300 to the USA.
      3. +2
        3 February 2017 20: 43
        Quote: Großer Feldherr
        Lukas is already old and the time is not far off when he himself will leave the helm

        Well, yes, I ran! A shift is preparing smile
  3. +6
    3 February 2017 17: 36
    If this fool has hemorrhoids, then the burn from under the tail had to be pulled out earlier. Do not bring the matter to bloodshed.
  4. +23
    3 February 2017 17: 38
    Entire nations and states become hostages of the personal ambitions of leaders ... trouble ... Old Man has become very old?
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 18: 15
      See my comment above.
  5. +14
    3 February 2017 17: 45
    something is happening behind the scenes .... it’s painfully loud and full-blown hysteria at the Old Man ... something I can’t believe that he was grabbed so hard by the wallet that the tantrum was for the whole CIS !!!!
    1. +9
      3 February 2017 17: 53
      Or maybe he was paid, and not a little ...
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 04: 58
        Quote: Alexanast
        Or maybe he was paid, and not a little ...

        He already has enough. Do you think he is in poverty?smile
        1. +7
          4 February 2017 09: 35
          And they are not superfluous hi
    2. +8
      3 February 2017 18: 45
      Quote: Damir
      something is happening behind the scenes .... it’s painfully loud and full-blown hysteria at the Old Man ... something I can’t believe that he was grabbed so hard by the wallet that the tantrum was for the whole CIS !!!!

      Here, too, I thought that we did not know much, it was evident that there were strong disagreements and they offended me very much. In principle, from our ghouls in the government and those close to the feeding trough of the other, one should not have expected them to promise and throw, like "two fingers ......", they fence around their people for the missing, so that they are Belarus.
  6. +9
    3 February 2017 17: 46
    Some sort of billiard occurs.
    They could always agree, but now they cannot.
    Someone, something, is not saying .........
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 17: 50
      Quote: Suharik.inline
      Some sort of billiard occurs.
      They could always agree, but now they cannot.
      Someone, something,.........

      That is the whole point.
    2. +16
      3 February 2017 18: 01
      Quote: Suharik.inline
      Some sort of billiard occurs.
      They could always agree, but now they cannot.
      Someone, something, is not saying .........

      Moscow will not feed anyone for no reason. You need to choose to be the Russian ally or partner. If you are an ally. then you have obligations, if the partner then go to market rails.
      An ally cannot say that the ATO is a warrior for independence.
    3. 0
      3 February 2017 18: 11
      They intrigue simply.
  7. +7
    3 February 2017 17: 46
    But what about the West-2017 exercises in response to the large-scale NATO exercises? Preparations for them are in full swing, in general. We should not give up training in protecting this territory, because our strategic facilities are there and the Belarusian people are not a stranger to us. Therefore the match should take place in any weather, and Minsk and Moscow need to eliminate the differences in approaches to integration.
    1. cap
      +7
      3 February 2017 18: 10
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      We can’t step back from training to protect this territory, because our strategic facilities are located there and the Belarusian people are not strangers to us. Therefore, the match should take place in any weather,


      He counts on this, believes that at such a moment haggling is appropriate. From the Soviet starley politician, he turned into an old mercantile huckster. Although .... to keep afloat for so much due to discounts and other preferences, to get a shit from the effective Russian managers who gained fat If you take into account that meat with shrimp also speaks Spanish, as the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare has found out, and there are no supplies at the box office, it’s a shame as much as three times.
      I remember a case on the Belarusian-Polish border, when in a duty-free shop, the line forced me to buy a block of cigarettes instead of one pack, for one simple reason, the seller had no change and she turned to my line over my shoulder:
      "-there man asks to sell a pack of cigarettes, exchange 100 euros!",
      quickly reacting to the rumble of the line at the back, I “corrected”
      - then let's block " laughing
      On the way, they explained to me that all cross-border trade was Lukashenko’s estate.
      1. +2
        3 February 2017 18: 35
        Quote: cap
        quickly responding to the rumble of the line

        Yeah ... smoking is bad! wassat
        1. cap
          +4
          3 February 2017 18: 46
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Quote: cap
          quickly responding to the rumble of the line

          Yeah ... smoking is bad! wassat

          Drinking is also harmful, so I took Barclay for delivery of whiskey laughing
          PS After two buses to Poland and Germany, the store was filled with a completely new delivery, as everything was taken out. I remember the Belarusian border like that.
    2. +6
      3 February 2017 18: 40
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      But what about the West-2017 exercises in response to large-scale NATO exercises? Preparations for them are in full swing, actually ..

      Will be along the way, but not teachings!
    3. +7
      3 February 2017 19: 08
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      But what about the West-2017 exercises in response to the large-scale NATO exercises? Preparations for them are in full swing, in general. We should not give up training in protecting this territory, because our strategic facilities are there and the Belarusian people are not a stranger to us. Therefore the match should take place in any weather, and Minsk and Moscow need to eliminate the differences in approaches to integration.

      Football Russia-Germany.
      The match Russia-Germany in Moscow. The Russians lose 0: 3. On the podium, an upset veteran shouts:
      - We beat them in Stalingrad, beaten in Berlin, and you?
      The Georgian sitting next to him turns and says:
      “Then, deed, you had another trainer!”
      In Russia, there are no teams left, they are honest, they are not even in the team of substitutes, and in fraternal Belarus, things are not better. But time will put everything in its place.
      1. cap
        +1
        3 February 2017 19: 33
        Quote: Berkut752
        In Russia, there are no teams left, they are honest, they are not even in the team of substitutes, and in fraternal Belarus, things are not better. But time will put everything in its place.


        Our coach is a professional, though the team consists of only amateurs, more reminiscent of "mishandled Cossacks." Something like this.
        About ten years ago, everyone was sure that the two parallel lines did not intersect, as it turned out to be a delusion. Maybe we still live in the territory of delusions, but we don’t even suspect about this.
        Time will tell you are right about that. hi
  8. +7
    3 February 2017 17: 48
    You still take your zarobitchitsy from Russia, they are here for us unnecessarily, there is nothing to feed our own.
  9. +7
    3 February 2017 17: 48
    A potato that would dad dad wassat
  10. +14
    3 February 2017 17: 49
    Lukashenko bit her bit ... The state is not a collective farm. The scale is needed. And soobrazhalka. He wants to BREAK the export of Belarusian products to Russia. Does he imagine the scale of the consequences? Or is his example Poroshenko inspiring? With a negative balance of payments?
    1. +4
      3 February 2017 18: 39
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Lukashenko bit her bit ... The state is not a collective farm. The scale is needed. And soobrazhalka. He wants to BREAK the export of Belarusian products to Russia. Does he imagine the scale of the consequences? Or is his example Poroshenko inspiring? With a negative balance of payments?

      Yes, he does not want to break off exports from Belarus to Russia! Yes, this is impossible. He wants the goods within the EurAsEC to go freely, without duty, and we are just making exemptions from the general rule regarding the supply of oil and gas there. So he shows the character, wants to prove that he is ready to go to the end, hysteria. Only, I think and hope that they will nevertheless meet and agree with Putin. Better at least a poor ally than not at all.
  11. +4
    3 February 2017 17: 50
    I will support Belarus.
    1. +36
      3 February 2017 17: 55
      Quote: Rabinovich
      I will support Belarus.

      Shekel support.
    2. +21
      3 February 2017 17: 56
      Quote: Rabinovich
      I will support Belarus.

      And if we are Hezbollah?
    3. +19
      3 February 2017 17: 57
      Quote: Rabinovich
      I will support Belarus.

      Yes, we somehow deal with each other by the Slavs.
      We can wake up ...
      But when the Jews try to "work with their elbows" Then all insults and feuds between us go by the wayside, we unite and DUBASIM these clever people SUPPORTED !!!!!
      1. 0
        3 February 2017 20: 50
        Quote: Pulya
        Yes, we somehow deal with each other by the Slavs.

        I would like to ... But so far the Slavic brothers have successfully razed Donetsk to the ground at the command of the Jews. And the likelihood that this will happen again in Belarus is growing. Butsk promised refuge from citizens of Belarus in Florida?
    4. +3
      3 February 2017 18: 03
      Who would doubt that laughing
    5. +6
      3 February 2017 18: 06
      How much poison to “Old Man” from people who know what is happening from the headlines? The question is rhetorical. The herd is frantic.
      1. +5
        3 February 2017 18: 49
        Quote: Grandfather Luka
        How much poison to “Old Man” from people who know what is happening from the headlines? The question is rhetorical. The herd is frantic.

        Alexander Grigorych, so you tell me directly that the people here wouldn’t be exhausted. laughing
      2. +1
        3 February 2017 20: 52
        Quote: Grandfather Luka
        Herd of rabid

        Remember, grandfather, Ukraine.
    6. +5
      3 February 2017 18: 14
      Support Iran ...
    7. +8
      3 February 2017 18: 23
      Rabinovich is you Old Man Lukashenko who sent 30 shekels the other day?
    8. +1
      3 February 2017 19: 20
      Quote: Rabinovich
      I will support Belarus
      in what?
  12. +7
    3 February 2017 17: 50
    Cho is not clear. What claims to Russia? If Lukashenko has the initiative (on exit), then why will Russia get burned?
    1. +5
      3 February 2017 18: 09
      Sacred Russia ... And its leadership is always right, so what? It is necessary to understand, and not to stand.
      About column 5 smiled) Who will clean it? Itself if only. Yes, and read about the Humpty Dumpty case, a vivid example of which Koreiko citizens are massively in power.
      1. +4
        3 February 2017 19: 17
        Quote: 3danimal
        Russia, sacred ... And its leadership is always right, so what? It is necessary to understand, and not to stand.

        not at all, but today Lukashenka acted like a cheater - a thimble and I’m sorry as a hysterical woman
    2. avt
      +18
      3 February 2017 18: 11
      Quote: Norma
      Cho is not clear. What claims to Russia?

      Well, But Butzka himself did not sign the Customs Code, in fact, and what HIS bureaucrats from customs should do in the EAEU?
      Lukashenko Announces "Violations by Russia of Customs Agreements and Legislation."
      Himself with a mustache, but traditionally Russia is to blame. Déjà vu .... but already great Litvin. Taperich Batsk decided to scare the hedgehog with his bare ass ... but does Yong know that the hedgehog is not a bear? bully
  13. LEK
    +3
    3 February 2017 17: 51
    Lukashenko handsome, he will not give his people an insult!
    1. +12
      3 February 2017 18: 03
      Like Poroshenko.
    2. +22
      3 February 2017 18: 09
      own people?

      rather your cooperative)

      if he loved his people, he would have long been a part of the Russian Federation
      1. +2
        3 February 2017 19: 19
        To put on the neck of Belarusians the yoke of the "oligarchy" of the Russian Federation? I do not wish them such a share. But Old Man was blown away. He did not want to be the Emperors of Russia, now he can become the six masters of the Fed, and they remember how he humiliated them and avenge them.
      2. 0
        4 February 2017 06: 49
        Quote: c-Petrov
        own people?

        rather your cooperative)

        if he loved his people, he would have long been a part of the Russian Federation

        How can he become part of the Russian Federation and simply turn from a ruler into a deputy or what governor?
    3. +23
      3 February 2017 18: 09
      And who offends the people of Belarus? You do not see that events are developing along the path of "maydaunov"? Evil Russia and the PTN offend the Belarusians, and here there are heroes, horses, "all on the Maidan", "friendship trains", then a complete break, and then you know. Already on May 9, 2015, this scenario was launched, remember the refusal to attend the Victory Parade, the replacement of St. George ribbons with state colors?
      1. cap
        +5
        3 February 2017 18: 52
        Quote: Pushkar
        Already on May 9, 2015, this scenario was launched, remember the refusal to attend the Victory Parade, the replacement of St. George ribbons with state colors?


        I remember I was very surprised and annoyed. I did not expect chesslovo.
    4. +4
      3 February 2017 19: 11
      And where are the people? The people still have nothing to get.
    5. +4
      3 February 2017 19: 16
      Quote: LEK
      he will not give his people an insult!

      nuuuu
      it is more like protecting the interests of commercial entities
    6. +1
      3 February 2017 19: 23
      And what offended? Who and how?
  14. +11
    3 February 2017 17: 52
    What a multi-vector ...
  15. +6
    3 February 2017 17: 52
    Yes and x. on him! Himself crawls on the fours! Let him not speak on behalf of the whole Belarusian people!
    1. +3
      3 February 2017 19: 11
      Quote: valent45
      am crawling on the fours!

      do not let go
  16. +11
    3 February 2017 17: 52
    "I do not pretend to be anything Russian."
    What about the money, Grygoritch? A minimum of $ 6 billion is owed. You should give it first, and then roll in .... wherever you want.
  17. +16
    3 February 2017 17: 53
    I don’t believe that Belarus is an enemy of Russia, but I believe that dad from the backyard immediately believe.
  18. +14
    3 February 2017 17: 53
    But how will he now supply “independent” Ukraine with diesel fuel, apparently it will be unprofitable? feel
  19. +13
    3 February 2017 17: 53
    TASS publishes an urgent message that the President of Belarus has decided

    So far, there have been only declarations. But, now the matter is already taking a serious turn. The game is on the nerves, there is an increase in rates. Putin's next move. Lukashenko openly begs! For some reason, the lapdog decided that it would scare the elephant.
    1. +6
      3 February 2017 19: 04
      Quote: Stas157
      The game is on the nerves, there is an increase in rates. Putin's next move.

      Ahhhhh, as usual, the GDP will not notice tantrums and just keep silent ... generally keep quiet ... (until all the farts are demolished) and then at a press conference he will answer that the drowning person should at least want to be saved ... and the GDP itself has nothing to do with it he was preparing for the arrival of the Sterkhov.
      True, this can finally finish off Luka.
  20. +14
    3 February 2017 17: 54
    Neither Russia nor Belarus is worth it. Such a hysteria does not arise from scratch, they have gone too far somewhere. "Not a single Russian person, not a single Russian will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, a stranger, that he turned to the West and somewhere else. They will not believe this." This is a message to us Russians. Others on the forum do not need to tear the gates on themselves and shout that they say that we are so beautiful and alone will manage.
    1. +14
      3 February 2017 18: 02
      You still sell your apartment and transfer money to this rat, suddenly it will help him
    2. +8
      3 February 2017 18: 05
      Quote: koni
      Not a single Russian person, not a single Russian will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, a stranger, that he turned to the West and somewhere else. They won’t believe it. "

      Why does he act like not a friend?
      1. +5
        3 February 2017 19: 18
        “Not a single Russian person, not a single Russian will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia ,.


        Belarus may not be the enemy, but Lukashenko is in doubt.
    3. +2
      3 February 2017 21: 15
      Quote: koni
      not a single Russian citizen will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, a stranger, that he turned to the West and somewhere else.

      There was a time, most recently it was when not a single Russian citizen believed that Ukraine was an enemy. And today we are scientists. We and Gorbachev remember how insidiously he deceived him. We and EBN remember how he heroically peed at their airport. And to list all the traitors in the USSR does not make sense. It is also clear that the price is being squeezed. But it turns out that from America. But father really grew old, now no one will give him a cent. They can promise. To accuse Russia of aggression looked better.
  21. +4
    3 February 2017 17: 54
    Dad! tired of usurpation, it's time to "sadists"
  22. The comment was deleted.
    1. +5
      3 February 2017 18: 01
      Historically justified by whom?
    2. +22
      3 February 2017 18: 04
      Quote: Stanislav Gandraburov
      Now there is a historically substantiated rapprochement with Ukraine and the Baltic countries.

      What is this Ukraine, a beater with an outstretched hand, can attract an old man? Is there a market for Belarusian goods? Or can loans be cheap? Or maybe oil and gas, at half the price, Ukraine can offer? What does the homeless have? Cowards, socks! Yes, and then torn!)) The same tribaltics applies!
    3. +13
      3 February 2017 18: 09
      Quote: Stanislav Gandraburov
      Now there is a historically substantiated rapprochement with Ukraine and the Baltic countries.

      It draws near, draws closer, the main thing is to send him a little little more money and don’t demand returns, here you’ll have a flat sidekick. laughing winkSomething to lure then you will, corn or something. tongue
    4. +7
      3 February 2017 18: 13
      Now there is a historically substantiated rapprochement with Ukraine and the Baltic countries.


      ahah

      well you and a drug addict
    5. +11
      3 February 2017 18: 24
      Quote: Stanislav Gandraburov
      Now there is a historically substantiated rapprochement with Ukraine and the Baltic countries.

      Of course it will be, you will ride on the ropes together with Rygoritch, you will have nothing more to take Rygorich with you rogue.
    6. +3
      3 February 2017 19: 08

      Stanislav Gandraburov
      Lukashenko realized that he was mistaken in drawing closer to the Russian Federation.
      Now there is a historically substantiated rapprochement with Ukraine and the Baltic countries.



      Will you be homeless together?

      Flag in hand, forge in teeth and drum on neck laughing
    7. 0
      3 February 2017 21: 45
      Yeah, historical countries losers poberushki and whores)) with such of course all losers get closer!
  23. +9
    3 February 2017 17: 55
    “There is no happiness in the Japanese” ..... A brilliant saying in relation to the Old Man now. His antics were predictable. The only chance to retain power and pass on to Kolenka is arrogant Russophobia and nationalism. But this is the next, and inevitable step.
  24. +11
    3 February 2017 17: 55
    Quote: Rabinovich
    I will support Belarus.

    Do not forget to support Ukraine and ISIS!
  25. +3
    3 February 2017 17: 55
    Not Putin should meet with Lukashenko.

    Their specialists should settle the problems. But Putin and Lukashenko must adhere to the ideological foundations. Give clear instructions to their specialists on what ideological positions to regulate relationships.

    Due to the sanctions, Russia in particular GDP has changed the idea of ​​relations. His specialists reacted and Belarus immediately felt this economically.

    Lukashenko, can signal Moscow using only political methods by the threat of a permanent exit from the union. No other methods can work in this case.
  26. +8
    3 February 2017 17: 55
    Really Putin will miss this demarche by attention. It’s necessary to crush the rat now, then it will be too late
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 19: 10
      and it’s like with a capricious child sometimes you just need to not notice, although it may be worth a while
    2. +2
      3 February 2017 21: 15
      Just a man
      Really Putin will miss this demarche by attention. It’s necessary to crush the rat now, then it will be too late

      Very true offer. Press urgently. Otherwise, we will lose White Russia. We are already losing it.
  27. +5
    3 February 2017 17: 56
    This is the height of stupidity and greed, pretended to be offended by Russia, the local god, indeed, the wind walks in my head, does not want to understand that all his actions are harmful to the people of Belarus. I want to mumble, but I want her in a “bathhouse”, I’ll try to politely say Lukashenko, and a very narrow-minded and petty person, hiding behind the interests of the people, you think about your feed. You will leave as a human being, obeying the peoples of Belarus and Russia for your greed and stupidity.
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 20: 03
      quote: “He usually has a wind in his head, but sometimes urine hits him” wink
  28. +10
    3 February 2017 17: 56
    ... material appeared citing unnamed sources, which stated that Minsk was considering withdrawing from the EAEU and the CSTO.

    In order to make any statements about hostage nations, leaders need to know a little the essence of the problems. It is possible to find out at a joint press conference of Lukashenko and Putin ... recourse
    And why did you actually get outraged that Belarus wants goods at a lower price? Maybe this dad doesn’t want the Belarusian economy to work for the pockets of different secular millers? belay You tell yourself how silently you rejoice at the meager handouts in response to the arrears of interest on loans, rising prices and low salaries ... belay Go to Red Square and resent the high prices for fuels and lubricants, electricity and ... lol water ...
    1. +4
      3 February 2017 18: 17
      Quote: yuriy55
      interest on loans

      Who makes you take it? Under machine gun trunks forced to sign loan agreements? What the hell are you talking about?
      Look here
      http://www.minfin.gov.by/public_debt/pressrelease
      s/21db889fc83d4fa6.html
      And tell us about the effective leadership of Butsky ..
    2. +5
      3 February 2017 18: 17
      Quote: yuriy55

      And why did you actually get outraged that Belarus wants goods at a lower price? Maybe this

      Give me candy - will I be friends?
      1. 0
        3 February 2017 19: 09
        Quote: Pushkar
        Give me candy - will I be friends?

        yes no shurik candy is not limited
    3. +6
      3 February 2017 18: 20
      Maybe this dad doesn’t want the Belarusian economy to work for the pockets of different secular millers?


      tell us about the wonderful working economy of the 8 millionth state

      with examples

      his entire economy is handouts from the Russian Federation. The state cannot live in debt - it’s not the state anymore, but don’t understand that

      The fact that he still is - and his state is on the map - the good will of the Russian Federation

    4. +6
      3 February 2017 18: 32
      I want to go to the stores "Belarusian Products" and buy products there for 5 cents, but better so for free!
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 06: 44
        You never know what. Belarusian goods are not cheap at all! !!!! Milk ----- at the Finnish level. One to one !!!!!!
        1. 0
          17 February 2017 11: 46
          So why can Belarus want Russian gas and oil for free? And Russian equipment too, but without our military!
  29. +9
    3 February 2017 18: 00
    Hurray !!!!!! Seafood from Polesie forests and dirty potatoes (in mud) will no longer be!
  30. +1
    3 February 2017 18: 02
    Understand the root
    1. +8
      3 February 2017 18: 07
      Ivan Ivanov hi
      Understand the root
      In that, the dad with his collective farms (on loans totally) wants to manage Russian oil fool
    2. +2
      3 February 2017 18: 18
      Quote: IvanIvanov
      Understand the root

      Loot must be given .., but do not want to.
    3. +1
      3 February 2017 18: 18
      I would also like to understand why Old Man kicked his hoof. But there is not enough information to understand the true reasons. As I understand it, Russia demanded something from him that “tore off the tower”. Or seduced by the "friendship" with the EU for the "promises" are different. In general, for the time being I will refrain from harsh words, for so far I have heard one side and that is speaking in riddles.
      1. +3
        3 February 2017 19: 04
        I would not mind understanding why Old Man kicked his hoof
        He wants gas for seventy-something dollars, instead of 132 and cheaper oil to get more fuel and lubricants, and then sell dill and other Europeans through Baltic ports.
    4. +3
      3 February 2017 19: 04
      Quote: IvanIvanov
      Understand the root

      It began a long time ago, under Yeltsin, when a union state was created, much was promised, and when it came to specifics, i.e. election of the head of this entity, the Russian Federation backed up. Indeed, nothing would shine for Yeltsin in the event of an election; Lukashenko would have won. By and large, everything goes on from those unmet ambitions, and as far as economic tantrums, more than half of the population of our planet probably do this (in other matters and on a larger scale), this is the essence of the person who was promised that they scammed and threw from three boxes. It comes off as it can and naturally does not forget itself.
  31. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  32. +8
    3 February 2017 18: 06
    Right! These are all leftist structures ... Russia is conducting the wrong policy! Russia needs not to appoint friends to itself, but to trade with everyone at world prices, and they themselves will ask us as friends when, due to trade at world prices, Russia will become rich!
  33. +9
    3 February 2017 18: 07
    Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, a stranger ...

    Lukashenko, first of all, substitutes Belarusians with his policies, he has thrust Belarus into the Russian oil and gas and credit needles with his inept economic policy, and an economy such as a drug addict needs an increasing dose, and at a lower price, and now breaking comes and, as a result, inappropriate behavior. Putin always succumbed to blackmail by Lukashenko when he threatened to leave the EAEU and the Collective Security Treaty Organization, and now Rygorych went all-in and decided to withdraw the Belarusian officials, hoping that Putin would give in again. But Russia is calmly responding to Lukashenko’s tantrums, and that makes it even worse. Instead of going to Moscow and negotiating, negotiating and negotiating again, the gray gelding bit the bit and gallops into the cliff.
    1. +10
      3 February 2017 18: 35
      Quote: Anatol Klim
      Lukashenko, first of all, exposes Belarusians to his politics, he throws Belarus into the Russian oil and gas and credit needles with his inept economic policy, and an economy such as a drug addict needs a bigger dose, but at a lower price

      Do you really think that the planned economy and industry of Belarus, which is focused on the Russian market by more than 90%, can survive without communication with the Russian Federation? An example of Ukraine does not mean anything? In Ukraine, the flagships of the economy are falling apart, not to mention medium-sized businesses, and 40 million people live there, unlike Belarus.
      And what Lukashenko is doing now is called a simple Russian word, political blackmail.
      1. +5
        3 February 2017 19: 12
        Quote: NEXUS
        The planned economy and industry of Belarus, which is focused on the Russian market by more than 90%, is able to survive without communication with the Russian Federation?

        And where did I write that the Belarusian economy should abandon the Russian market? I’m saying that in Belarus, thousands of state enterprises, collective farms, organizations, institutions, to put it mildly, do not earn their maintenance, they are unprofitable, they work at the warehouse, but workers regularly get paid, and due to what they are paid, or rather, at the expense of whom ? Here again, Lukashenko told his officials that the Belarusian salary should be $ 500, where you want there and take it, even steal ... (not exactly, but the point is). Ask the Belarusian how much the “hare” has lost zeros since birth. Is this an indicator of sound economic policy? Without Russia's support, the Belarusian economy would have been bankrupt for a long time, reforms are needed, and Lukashenko does not want to or cannot carry them out. By the way, you are not telling me, but tell the great chairman that the Belarusian economy is more than 90% focused on the Russian market and cannot survive without the Russian market, because it threatens to leave the EAEU and withdraws its officials.
        1. +2
          4 February 2017 06: 35
          Worst of all, the POLITICAL blackmail of the father is increasing all the time. Moreover, in his previous speeches, his phrase was that the Republic of Belarus (or its economy) was dependent and became hostage to its partner, that is, the Russian Federation is identified as guilty if something is wrong with the Republic of Belarus. Bad phrase sounded! HAVE that phrase, the President himself is setting his people against the Russian Federation. !!!!!!!!!! And the violation is unilateral ??? A very strange act by the President of the Republic of Belarus, especially after the events in Ukraine.
          Many wrote that no one wants to be friends with Russia for free !!!!! Only for the money. BUT my worst is not this !!!!! TAKE the money ------ say thanks !!!!! So who did Russia hear this from? Count on the fingers! Anyway, there’s not much to give, but instead of thanks --- intrigues, intrigues, blackmail !!!!!
  34. +3
    3 February 2017 18: 08
    Yeah owlsthis "roof" went to the director of the "state farm" .... request
  35. +1
    3 February 2017 18: 09
    but we can’t not so wrong, it was hard to walk along the Path
  36. +9
    3 February 2017 18: 09
    Quote: koni
    This is a message to us Russians. Others on the forum do not need to tear the gates on themselves and shout that they say that we are so beautiful and alone will manage.

    However, I also can’t believe that the Old Man has requested something supernatural.
    There is still Belarus to crap ....
    1. +3
      3 February 2017 18: 29
      There is still Belarus to crap ....


      better now than at a critical moment to get a feint. And how is it pr * - if it depends on us 99% - in this situation pr * can only Belarus

  37. +1
    3 February 2017 18: 16
    Lukashenko completely played up. I am writing to Belarusians: What is going on with you? Belarus for Belarusians? Do you want to become Nazis? They write: Everything is calm. And so they slowly turn into b ..
    1. Caa
      +5
      3 February 2017 19: 01
      Quote: victorrat
      Lukashenko completely played up. I am writing to Belarusians: What is going on with you? Belarus for Belarusians? Do you want to become Nazis? They write: Everything is calm. And so they slowly turn into b ..


      And where are you, in fact, and why are you writing?))) Here are the addresses for you, open news related to Russia and read comments. These are the 2 most popular resources: 99,9% of the audience. Representativeness is exceptional. Draw conclusions.
      tut.by
      onliner.by
  38. 0
    3 February 2017 18: 24
    He feels that the freebie is ending, it starts to freeze both yours and ours, but you can’t sit on two chairs with one ass, you will squeak!
  39. +4
    3 February 2017 18: 30
    Not a single Russian person, not a single Russian will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia

    Lukashenko is not an enemy of Russia, but a snickering senile. All these years, I bought gas, oil for a penny .. Again, trying to poke everything for nothing, frightening, ending with a "sincere friendship" with the Russian people and the Kremlin. The example of Ukraine, I am sure, the Kremlin has taught a lot, and I won’t let Moscow take its course, so as not to get the second Maidan in the underbelly at home. And therefore, I will not be surprised that soon, the old man will leave his post and put a more adequate person.
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 19: 30
      Quote: NEXUS
      And therefore, I will not be surprised that soon, the old man will leave his post and put a more adequate person.

      Eh, NEXUS, there the pro-Russian political field has been cleared. Lukashenko today is 7 hours! I talked with reporters, talked a lot of things, but again I kind of agreed to negotiations, so I won’t be surprised that he will get out again, he has a manic dependence on the authorities, so you won’t have to be surprised. No.
  40. +2
    3 February 2017 18: 33
    In general, the whole pumped-up blizzard began because Batko introduced a visa-free regime for 5 days for 80 countries. Accordingly, control points were set up that did not exist a priori all this time. Why did they bribe them and leaked mambets? And why he made such a decision is already a question.
  41. +10
    3 February 2017 18: 35
    Quote: Stanislav Gandraburov
    Lukashenko realized that he was mistaken in drawing closer to the Russian Federation.
    Now there is a historically substantiated rapprochement with Ukraine and the Baltic countries.

    This will never happen! angry Never did the Belarusian people respect the huckster-okraintsev, and even more so the arrogant pseudo-geyropeyts of the Baltic states negative
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 19: 25
      Do you think the names are not consonant with Poroshenko - Lukashenko? Is he really a Belarusian? Folk: Zhokhol was born - a Jew cried.
      Tribaltica has already infested. Schoolchildren have nothing to tell about them about everyone: achievements, culture, news, how are they all different from each other there? What will they represent? Honduras is much more often mentioned in everyday life.
      And that Lukashenko understood that Poroshenko would not understand.
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 16: 25
        Sibiryachka, actually Poroshenko is not a native surname. By mother he is Poroshenko, and by father and grandfather - Weizman. Jew.
  42. +3
    3 February 2017 18: 35
    the "old man" began to play in an independent
  43. +2
    3 February 2017 18: 36
    Old Man, are you crazy? Has opened its borders, and we must open, in your opinion, or do you think that all the intelligence you think will play? Naive....
  44. +3
    3 February 2017 18: 42
    The article is sucked out of a finger, and from rotten one. Before hysteria, information would not be bad to check. http://www.belta.by/president/view/lukashenko-vyh
    od-belarusi-iz-eaes-i-sojuznogo-gosudarstva-polny
    j-vymysel-231354-2017 /
    1. 0
      4 February 2017 17: 02
      If the Russian media began to write disu - it means they are fulfilling the order. Even VO was surprised by a handful of provocateurs who pour dirt on Lukoshenko. And many here, not even trying to look for additional information, are being led to this custom article. Have come - Lukoshenko is the main enemy. Let's study the facts first. VO quickly began to turn into a frantic agitation. This is sad. Lukoshenko himself called all these rumors.
      The President noted that such information appears because there are people who benefit from it, they are happy to disseminate such information

      http://m.belta.by/president/view/lukashenko-vyhod
      -belarusi-iz-eaes-i-sojuznogo-gosudarstva-polnyj-
      vymysel-231354-2017 /
  45. +1
    3 February 2017 18: 42
    Well, let them knock if anointed under mustard. Geyropa and help them, you can not even doubt
  46. 0
    3 February 2017 18: 44
    He wants money, and this is all a threat so far, and possibly indulgences from the West (at least part of it).
  47. +2
    3 February 2017 18: 44
    Hysterics Freeloader. Less freebie, all brotherly feelings immediately disappear. They begin to look for new brothers who will give a freebie, but such west of Brest NOT!!! negative
  48. +2
    3 February 2017 18: 46
    Don’t blame Old Man, he’s still not the president of Russia, he cares about his Belarus. And it’s not his fault that we allow our elite to tear up, rob, sell what everyone has earned ...
    1. +3
      3 February 2017 19: 26
      Yeah, my guardian too ... negative
  49. +3
    3 February 2017 18: 51
    To call a fraud with visa-free travel for Russia its political decision to “punish the people of Belarus” ... No comment. I'm not a doctor.
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 19: 23
      I can give a visa to China
  50. +2
    3 February 2017 18: 51
    By his decision, Lukashenko recalled Belarusian officials from the customs authorities of the EAEU. This message appeared during his press conference, during which Lukashenko announced "Russia's violations of customs agreements and legislation."

    Minsk recalls Belarusian specialists from the customs structures of the EAEU. Recall that on the eve of the news agency Regnum appeared material with reference to unnamed sources, which stated that Minsk was considering leaving the EAEU and the CSTO. In the same article, it was noted that Moscow is not going to impede if the leadership of Belarus makes such a decision,
    Well, is it really not clear that the days of ultimatums in politics are long gone. Especially in relation to Russia. It is necessary to negotiate.
  51. +2
    3 February 2017 18: 52
    Lukashenko is right! Our government confuses the government pocket with the commercial pocket.

    Million-dollar monthly salaries of officials add fuel to the fire of hatred towards the new oligarchy that has taken over the Russian state.
    1. +7
      3 February 2017 19: 12
      Quote: Mikhail Anokhin
      Lukashenko is right! Our government confuses the government pocket with the commercial pocket.

      Logic be damned.. And what, may I ask you, is in your pocket? Money..not? These are, you know, conventional units for which you can purchase quite real goods for yourself.. IT’S CALLED COMMERCIAL..
      I don’t agree that our state would also support the Belarusian elite. Or do you naively believe that an ordinary hard worker in Minsk has something to gain from the preferences that the Russian Federation gives to the Republic of Belarus?
      Just judge...why does KamAZ need a competitor in the form of MaZ? Vladimir Tractor Minsky?

      I can continue the list... Oil is cheap, father, Belt products have duty-free access to the Russian market... and they also participate in Russian subsidy programs...
      Well, if you want to be completely independent... let the example of Ukraine be nearby.
      Just don’t reduce it all to brotherhood... the state has no brothers. only interests.
      But my father seems to have confused his personal with his state ones.
      [media=[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Js
      g7Ir_vH%20g]]
  52. +1
    3 February 2017 18: 55
    "Either eat a fish or run aground"
    Greed and freebies ruined the schemer. crying
  53. 0
    3 February 2017 19: 00
    What's interesting on Dad's mind?
  54. +1
    3 February 2017 19: 02
    Free, free! If Lukashenko doesn’t need anything Russian. Who is holding him?
  55. 0
    3 February 2017 19: 05
    Shurik is the most important crest of the union
  56. +6
    3 February 2017 19: 06
    that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, a stranger, that he has turned to the West and somewhere else. They won't believe this.


    After his actual support of the fascist-Bandera regime of Hochland, after his latest gestures towards Russia - I BELIEVE!!!!
  57. +3
    3 February 2017 19: 07
    It seems that Poroshenko and Lukoshenko visit only squirrels.

    “Russia is to blame for everything” is a familiar song.
  58. +3
    3 February 2017 19: 18
    Let it turn out, it won’t be worse than in the early 90s
  59. 0
    3 February 2017 19: 21
    It’s very far away somewhere, I don’t care at all.
  60. 0
    3 February 2017 19: 23
    Petty tyrant. Petty tyrant.
  61. 0
    3 February 2017 19: 24
    Let Lukashenka take a long stride... with a Belarus like this there is no need for enemies...
  62. +3
    3 February 2017 19: 25
    Are you sure that he is wrong? Look what a treasure our people hold dear to our people. No matter how much bread grows, the price will still rise in the fall, oil will become cheaper on the world market, and gasoline will rise. So ours also have a stigma. We wonder why crests are demolishing monuments, but didn’t demolish them themselves? Luzhkov shouted Russia ahead, but where does he live? So think about where the truth is and where the lies are.
    1. +3
      3 February 2017 19: 40
      Voenoboz
      Are you sure that he is wrong?


      Sure!!!!



      “Peter Alekseevich, if you need anything from Belarus, tell me, we will do everything you ask within 24 hours.”
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 15: 06
        Yes, he delayed the collapse of the state into regional principalities (we have a war in Chechnya - unnecessary victims), the state is slowly transforming into another formation (Like China). I compare the industry of the city in which I live (most of it was destroyed and the rest is not capable of fulfilling large tasks). But he did not allow this to happen (What about Ukraine?).
  63. 0
    3 February 2017 19: 29
    Quote: VOENOBOZ
    Luzhkov shouted Russia ahead, but where does he live?

    where?
    1. 0
      4 February 2017 14: 49
      In Switzerland.
      1. 0
        5 February 2017 07: 38
        If you don’t know, don’t write, with all my controversial attitude towards “meadow”, why lie, he lives in the Kaliningrad region
  64. The comment was deleted.
  65. +1
    3 February 2017 19: 48
    An anecdote in the subject.
    "Alexander Lukashenko said that he is tired of being president. The coronation is scheduled for Thursday."
    Where and with whom will these customs officials work now?
  66. +1
    3 February 2017 20: 06
    Does anyone understand what's going on? what
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 21: 54
      Shura once again wants something, we have simply forgotten his tantrums on December 31, but in fact he always behaved like this
    2. +1
      4 February 2017 10: 59
      The pie is getting thinner, and the oligarchs, who are accustomed to eating into three throats, are becoming more and more aggressive.
  67. +3
    3 February 2017 20: 08
    Quote: Anatole Klim
    Quote: NEXUS
    The planned economy and industry of Belarus, which is focused on the Russian market by more than 90%, is able to survive without communication with the Russian Federation?

    And where did I write that the Belarusian economy should abandon the Russian market? I’m talking about the fact that in Belarus, thousands of state enterprises, collective farms, organizations, institutions, to put it mildly, do not earn their own maintenance, they are unprofitable, they work for a warehouse, but the workers regularly receive salaries, and at what expense are they paid, or rather, at the expense of whom ? Here again Lukashenko told his officials that the salary of a Belarusian should be 500 dollars, take it wherever you want, even if you steal it...(not exactly, but that’s the meaning). [i]Ask a Belarusian how many zeros the “hare” has lost since birth. Is this an indicator of sound economic policy?[/i] Without Russian support, the Belarusian economy would have been bankrupt long ago,reforms are needed, but Lukashenko does not want to carry them out or cannot. By the way, you tell not me, but the great chairman, that the Belarusian economy is more than 90% focused on the Russian market and cannot survive without the Russian market, because it is he who threatens to leave the EAEU and recalls his officials.


    Hasn't the ruble added zeros?
    And what kind of reforms do the Bulbash need? Please list them, otherwise the crests were also reformed. Are you talking about such reforms? If we talk about such reforms, then what kind of hockey do the Bulbashians not need?
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 20: 55
      Quote: loginovich
      Please list

      Well, you apparently don’t know how the Belarusian ruble depreciated after Rygorych’s orders to increase wages by order: in 1994, the Belarusian ruble depreciated by 10 times, in 2000 by 1000, on July 1, 2016 by 10000 times. Neither the Russian ruble nor the hryvnia lost so many zeros.
      And what reforms are needed, well, a little offhand:
      -live within your means, and not at the expense of someone else’s oil;
      -reform and repurpose unprofitable enterprises, rather than maintaining them on subsidies;
      -don’t choke the private sector with taxes, it’s already barely alive;
      - repeal the law on parasites, it is not thought out at all, the pension reform has been stupidly reduced to raising the retirement age (Russia is facing the same thing);
      - increase labor productivity by investing in high-tech technologies;
      - reduce the tax burden, bureaucracy during reports, government pressure. organs...
      1. +4
        3 February 2017 22: 57
        According to your list, I agree one hundred percent. But my life experience suggests that the reforms will come down to raising the retirement age, renaming streets, demolishing Soviet monuments, abolishing Soviet holidays and replacing Russian words with a set of sounds of unknown origin such as stripyzdyk, etc.
  68. 0
    3 February 2017 20: 11
    A real stab in the back from the Belarusians. Or a paid share? Paid for by whom? And how much does it cost to set one people at odds with another? But, by the way, Lord, deliver us from our friends, and we will deal with our enemies.
  69. 0
    3 February 2017 20: 13
    Well done Lukashenko! He does everything right.
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 21: 55
      What exactly?!
      please be specific
  70. +6
    3 February 2017 20: 15
    The whole country is 10 mil. man... They should have been rolling like cheese in butter for a long time! But they don't ride. “Where is the money, Zin?” They cut in his borders with the Russian Federation... And what was he thinking when he opened for 80 countries without visas... The cockroach began to play.
  71. +3
    3 February 2017 20: 16
    So what has our leadership achieved? Destroyed all ties with the union state. What a disgrace!
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 21: 56
      and without hysterics, what connections and how it was destroyed can you explain
      p/s/ cons are still needed
  72. +1
    3 February 2017 20: 18
    No offense to you, Belarusian brothers, but your president has already tired you with his quirks. Either I get married, or I don’t. I would like to tell him to get lost already, enough of the latest Chinese warnings.
    But I really don’t want any distance between ordinary people at the everyday level. And I really don’t want Maidans for Belarus, like the Ukrainians.
  73. 0
    3 February 2017 20: 19
    Shame on all commentators criticizing Lukashenko.
    1. +1
      3 February 2017 21: 58
      I mean the main thing is the number of posts?!!
      maybe you can try to add quality?
  74. +2
    3 February 2017 20: 20
    For many years in a row, Luke in the West was called the last dictator of Europe. The day before yesterday new notes were heard for the first time. The meaning is this: Mordor after Ukraine began to strangle poor Belarus with exorbitant prices for oil and gas.
    Now Luka has turned from a dictator into a victim of the Putin regime. In!
  75. +4
    3 February 2017 20: 22
    Lukashenko is a big hypocrite. It is not at all necessary that a good collective farm chairman can be a far-sighted President.
  76. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      3 February 2017 21: 02
      We have a lot of oligarchs, but some of them are imprisoned. And you have one “brother”, whose name is Lukashenko. Nobody will imprison him for sure; he does what he wants, and even for a Russian freebie.
    2. +1
      3 February 2017 21: 59
      Quote: Ilja2016
      There are so many defenders of Russian oligarchs on the site.
      "and then Ostap got carried away"
    3. +1
      4 February 2017 04: 53
      Quote: Ilja2016
      There are so many defenders of Russian oligarchs on the site.

      But in “aligarchic” Belarus, according to a sociological survey conducted at the beginning of 2016, only 15,7% of the local population are satisfied with their standard of living.request According to official data, there is no unemployment in the country, but in reality its level reaches 15%. Many citizens regularly leave to work: to Russia, Poland, Germany, and the Baltic states. This is explained by the fact that the average salary in Belarus is much less than in these countries.
  77. The comment was deleted.
  78. +4
    3 February 2017 20: 53
    Guys, I read the comments and read them. For 10% of those who think sensibly, 90% are “where the hell will Belarus go” and “let him go wherever he wants.” Gentlemen/comrades..... if these figures reflect the general mood in society, we will soon lose the last friendly partner in Belarus, and we will begin to divide the Russian Federation. And what ? "Where the hell would Buryatia go without us?" , "let Siberia go wherever it wants, even to China" ...........
    Do you even understand where the crazy “oligarchs” are dragging us? They don’t care, they are “citizens of the world.” We are unlikely to be able to do anything, but at least we need to understand! Soon the Moscow region will remain alone. And that’s not a fact. Let's finish scattering....
    1. +4
      3 February 2017 21: 48
      It is not the oligarchs who are dragging us down, but these would-be brothers who are accustomed to the fact that Russia will feed and support them. Russia is not obliged to solve Belarus' economic problems. Endless blackmail will eventually backfire on the blackmailer. Lukashenka apparently got so fed up with these cheap theatrical productions that Russia simply showed toughness and refused to follow the lead. Russia is developing, but Belarus stands still and lives only thanks to Russia. With a friend like Lukashenko there is no need for enemies.
      1. +1
        3 February 2017 22: 28
        Maybe there is still something we don’t know? (but the men don’t know!!!). For some reason, our gluttons, who were glutted, wanted to squeeze out something too dear to him, and that’s the reaction. There were gentle offers to “donate a pipe”, “give away some enterprises”.... (like, to ruin them).
        By the way, there was a Singer plant in Podolsk. The bourgeoisie came with an offer to buy. There are a lot of plans, beautiful pictures, like crowds of people through the entrance there. From there to the return line there are clouds of sewing machines...... Some bought, others sold. Months pass, people are quietly being laid off. A couple of years passed... The director and the chief accountant remained. Someone in power is asking the bourgeoisie. "And what, actually, how is the reconstruction there?" , to which we received the answer - well... it didn’t work out. If you bring our sewing machines, we will give you a good discount........ Paragraph. They may not have shipped the most high-tech products, the Japanese will clearly do better, but half the city worked and received wages. Now only the director and chief accountant. And so throughout the country. Why bombs, the buck has more destructive power. Let's annex Belarus to the Russian Federation, our privatizers will finish off the remaining production in the Republic of Belarus, as they did in the Russian Federation.
        1. +5
          3 February 2017 23: 38
          Quote: DMB84
          Let's annex Belarus to the Russian Federation, our privatizers will finish off the remaining production in the Republic of Belarus, as they did in the Russian Federation.

          What kind of production exactly? And under what conditions does this production exist? Have you ever tried to ask such questions?
          There is a Radio Factory in Molodechno. Where does he supply his products?
          Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
          Who buys MAZ, BelAZ and MTZ? Aren't these the Russian oligarchs who you are inciting here for their needs?
          It’s strange... I read... and the business owner is strong and has preserved the industry... Why is he walking around with his hand outstretched? The industry is bad... And who does he go to? To Moscow, whose sewing machine factory in Podolsk has closed... what a disaster... Even this scheme doesn’t add up... doesn’t it?
          1. 0
            4 February 2017 01: 38
            People, capitalism is everywhere these days, even among the Chinese! And all without knowledge of economics! The fact that production was falling apart in the Russian Federation is a completely predictable and abnormal process, why should it suddenly and immediately develop if in the USSR, apart from military equipment and the needs of oil and gas production and other minerals, they did nothing else?!?!! Of course, it has sagged, and is only just beginning to gain competitiveness. It’s the same in the Republic of Belarus, only everything there was subsidized, and at whose expense do you think? Yes, stupidly at the expense of the Russian Federation budget, all these years after the collapse, the same thing happened with Ukraine. When this has to end, I’m not against friendship with the Republic of Belarus, and Belarusians are cheerful and good people, but again, I’ll repeat it - capitalism is everywhere now! And don’t talk nonsense about the fact that an ordinary resident of the Russian Federation has nothing from the oil industry, he has and how, the more or less normal standard of living under capitalism that we have is the result of this. Well, by the way, the ability of officials to steal and take kickbacks is also due to oil revenues. If it weren’t for the natural resources of the Russian Federation, the Russian Federation would have really collapsed, so during the transition to a market economy we had nothing competitive at all except these resources.
            1. +1
              4 February 2017 09: 29
              Quote: Serhiodjan
              If it weren’t for the natural resources of the Russian Federation, the Russian Federation would have really collapsed, so during the transition to a market economy we had nothing competitive at all except these resources.

              Only uh... these resources were quickly privatized by a bunch of people of unknown nationality. As is energy. And the money went far not into the budget, but into someone’s bottomless pocket. Those crumbs that the “privatizers” shook off the master’s shoulder were laughed at by the chickens. Do not know. that they all have “very preferential taxation” ... Unlike, for example, small enterprises ...
              1. 0
                4 February 2017 16: 49
                Quote: DMB84
                These are the ones our thick-walled people are trying to finish off...

                And why do they need this? Do you have a rational explanation for this? Because it’s irrational...revenge on my father for the preservation of Soviet industry...doesn’t suit me.
                In my opinion.. for some reason they don’t buy KAMAZ tractors and dump trucks. Agroprom85 tractors.. what makes them do this.. huh?
          2. 0
            4 February 2017 09: 22
            Quote: dvina71
            It’s strange... I read... and the business owner is strong and has preserved the industry... Why is he walking around with his hand outstretched? The industry is bad... And who does he go to? To Moscow, whose sewing machine factory in Podolsk has closed... what a disaster... Even this scheme doesn’t add up... doesn’t it?

            And what, our “business executives” are not always holding out their hand? And doesn’t the allocated money just magically evaporate somewhere? Are we experiencing a boom in industry and an increase in employment? Maybe I overslept the good news? The old man’s mentality is no worse and no better, but the SAME as ours. Just in sight..
            1. +1
              4 February 2017 12: 43
              Quote: DMB84
              And what, our “business executives” are not always holding out their hand?

              At first I wanted to give you a detailed answer.. I went into the GAZ Group’s reports.. there is such a dying company of Deripaska.., and then I thought.. why? You can’t change you anyway.. You don’t care that Deripaska moved an entire plant from the USA , with all the technologies that a new line of cars, engines is being developed and mastered..
              But my father kept it...
              1. 0
                4 February 2017 14: 11
                If GAZ succeeds, I will be immensely happy. Quite seriously. I really want to be proud of something of my own. Otherwise, Kondratiy is taking away from me from the domestic auto industry. I would generally castrate the designers, in particular GAZ. That life should not be taken, but not given the opportunity to reproduce. The engineering solutions are simply fantastic - for example, on an all-metal van body, weld ferrous metal hinges on the OUTSIDE and then paint them. Motorists will understand what will ultimately happen.
                PS/ I’ll read about Deripaska, it’s interesting. Maybe not everything is so sad in the country... I wish...
                1. 0
                  4 February 2017 16: 45
                  Quote: DMB84
                  Otherwise, Kondratiy is taking away from me from the domestic auto industry.

                  What do you use from the domestic auto industry? Here I had: GazelkaBZil-5301..now MAZ-4370.. And having MAZ..I remember ZIL with kind words..except for its hydraulic brakes..
                  As for modern Russian cars... they, in principle, correspond to the quality of Western manufacturers.
                  YouTube is full of videos of reports on the operation of GAZEY, Lawn Next and they are more positive.
                  I can also tell you a lot about the operation of Western trucks.. About 22 two critical errors in the Volvo FH caused by a burnt-out compressor gasket.. and about the hydraulic switching on the MAN gearbox.. it’s very fun to pump it outside the service station..
          3. 0
            4 February 2017 09: 24
            Quote: dvina71
            Who buys MAZ, BelAZ and MTZ? Aren't these the Russian oligarchs who you are inciting here for their needs?

            These are the ones our deep-pocketed people are trying to finish off... These enterprises. So that it would be like with ZIL, AZLK and others. By the way, I see something more on the roads of MANA and a Chinese herd of different-sized trucks.
            1. 0
              4 February 2017 12: 50
              Quote: DMB84
              . By the way, I see something more on the roads of MANA and a Chinese herd of different-sized trucks.

              Statistics only for 15 years..for now..
              As the Avtostat Info agency explained to Gudok.ru, the total fleet of trucks in Russia in 2015 was also mainly formed from products of the KamAZ concern and the GAZ Group. In third place with a significant lag are MAZ trucks. Cars produced at GAZ group factories account for 24% of the total vehicle fleet - 744,7 thousand units. KamAZ trucks make up 23,6% of the total number of commercial vehicles - 733,7 thousand units. There are 216,1 thousand MAZs on Russian roads, or 7%.

              “Uralov” in Russia - 3,9% of trucks or 121 thousand 623 vehicles, Volvo - 2,6% or 81 thousand 775, MAN - 2,5% or 77 thousand 846, ISUZU - 2,2% or 68 692 thousand, FUSO - 2,1% or 65 thousand 855, Scania - 2,1% or 64 thousand 888 units. Mercedec has 1,9% or 58 thousand 872 units. For other brands, the share of the fleet does not exceed 1,4%.
          4. 0
            5 February 2017 01: 42
            Quote: dvina71
            There is a Radio Factory in Molodechno. Where does he supply his products?
            Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

            there is no Radio Plant there anymore, not one
            2 shopping centers, 3 floors each
            and back in 2008 there was at least one, but the most multi-chaired one did not recognize something there and the orders went to Ukraine. Well then, that’s fate.
      2. 0
        4 February 2017 15: 10
        Nonsense and nothing more, turn on your brain, emotions only do harm.
    2. 0
      3 February 2017 22: 01
      Quote: DMB84
      . if these numbers reflect the general mood in society

      yes, not general, of course, but at the same time Lukoshenko sometimes brings it up specifically, I understand that he, like a true peasant, bargains to the last and tries to sell a bucket to his neighbor even during a fire, but still you need to have a conscience
      about friendship and alliance, then forgive me this is just 90% in words
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 15: 14
        What do you think, the Poles are your allies?
    3. +2
      3 February 2017 22: 34
      Why do you think that Belarus is a friendly partner? What do you understand by this definition? My personal opinion is that this is demagoguery and self-deception. Now a mine planted a long time ago is going off. First of all, the Russian Federation has to deal with this shit. What do you personally suggest?
  79. 0
    3 February 2017 21: 37
    Fucking trader!!!
    1. +1
      3 February 2017 22: 01
      Well, no, he’s great as a trader
  80. 0
    3 February 2017 21: 48
    “And then Ostap got carried away” (c)
  81. +3
    3 February 2017 22: 08
    That's it - they bought a "bang" with Western loans, and cutting off freebies from the Russian Federation is just an excuse. Then there will be a forgetting about paying off accumulated debts to Russia and other insults to the bulbous family! And so - he keeps his word to Western creditors, he kept his word better when he was talking about the Union State - he is a potato babbler, you see, he was offended by Russia. Apparently there is enough money in bank accounts, now you can bark about it and indiscriminately blame the Russian Federation for everything. We have added another “offended” neighbor! People of the Republic of Belarus, be vigilant, another traitor is ready to drain his people for the needs of the West. am
  82. +1
    3 February 2017 22: 08
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    Well, no, he’s great as a trader

    You are definitely right!!! Such a horseradish will sell for the price of gold... and he will buy gold for the price of horseradish.....)
  83. +2
    3 February 2017 22: 12
    “Not a single Russian person, not a single Russian will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, a stranger, that he has turned to the West and somewhere else.” Uncle Sasha, take off your rose-colored glasses, thousands of Russians will say that this is so, and maybe a million
    1. 0
      4 February 2017 15: 20
      “Not a single Russian person, not a single Russian will believe that Belarus, that Lukashenko is an enemy of Russia, I COMPLETELY AGREE (capital is rushing like a bulldozer). + information processing.
  84. +3
    3 February 2017 22: 14
    Yes, and one more thing.... It’s clear about oil tycoons from this site. “We”, “Our oil”, “Our gas”... Where are we, ordinary residents of the Russian Federation, who do not see gas everywhere in the Moscow region. I wanted to say something else. How pleasant do you think it is for a resident of Belarus who accidentally (or purposefully) came here to read expressions like “he will crawl on his knees,” “he will come running like a darling,” “he will bow,” etc. Even if it’s not about an entire country, but about its president... Even if he’s not very beloved in his own country. GDP is also far from ideal, but how much fun would it be for us to read about it in such terms in the Belarusian media? or somewhere else? Maybe it's good to turn up your nose? Moreover, I don’t know in detail how the situation with production is in Belarus, but I know first-hand that ALL production is in ruins, and we continue to destroy everything that we have not yet managed to destroy. The military-industrial complex generally lives a very strange life - workers receive starvation rations, and the estimate for a blank no more complicated than a dumbbell is the average budget of a small state. Are we proud? Well, yes.... a rich country, if we still hold on. And what about the fact that there is simply nowhere to work in any city, including Moscow and St. Petersburg? Except sellers, janitors and bankers. For the first, there are not many vacancies; for the second, you don’t want to work; for the third, they are not allowed. The state should create plants and factories, and not destroy them. We really have too many people for such a policy. We interfere with the extraction of minerals. We walk on top, mutter something, want to eat. It's time to reduce the population. Dad with all his
    ambiguity like industrial enterprises are not given up for ruin. Are there any Belarusians? Tell me I'm wrong?
    1. +3
      3 February 2017 23: 45
      You don’t see gas everywhere in the Moscow region? Is EVERYTHING of industry destroyed? Just ask how things are going with gasification in the Republic of Belarus - almost 90% of settlements are gasified, maybe we are not helping much? Do we have any extra money now? There is constant lamentation here at VO, saying that defense programs are shifting to the right, including due to budget cuts, we also have a crisis and sanctions, is it really not clear that we cannot help in the same amount? Is it impossible to endure something together, without the bull? Moreover, seeing how the GDP is able to negotiate, I don’t think that the main reason is in it. As for our oligarchs, I don’t see any examples of really necessary and normally functioning foreign production being bought and destroyed. But by the way, there was a scandal regarding potash fertilizers - Lukashenko kicked ours out, so how did the business go after that?
      1. 0
        5 February 2017 02: 07
        Quote: Cook
        Just ask how things are going with gasification in the Republic of Belarus - almost 90% of settlements are gasified, maybe we are not helping much?

        Absolutely right, mass gasification was carried out under the AHL in the 2000s.
        But it wasn't free either.
        Conditionally free (the budget is taxpayers' money) only the main pipes to the border of the populated area, the rest (intra-city networks, supply to the house, intra-house wiring, gas equipment) at the expense of the population.

        Quote: Cook
        Moreover, seeing how the GDP is able to negotiate, I don’t think that the main reason is in it.

        So the AHL, in fact, constantly said at the press conference that there are no problems coming to an agreement with the GDP, but when the gray faceless bureaucracy gets down to business, then it’s immediately a wedge.

        Quote: Cook
        But by the way, there was a scandal regarding potash fertilizers - Lukashenko kicked ours out, so how did the business go after that?

        It wasn’t AGL who rejected it, but the world’s manufacturers through AGL. Bo Baumgertner and Co. are very smart - they collapsed the world potassium market at prices by 30-40%, so that they would have a more advantageous position in negotiations for the purchase of protein potassium.
        But, do not forget that in addition to the Republic of Belarus, potash fertilizers are produced by Germany, Canada, Israel, and the USA, and they know how to count money.
  85. +1
    3 February 2017 22: 15
    Why don't we believe it? Let's believe it. Although you turn out to be more of an enemy of Belarus. You're acting like a spoiled whore.
  86. +1
    3 February 2017 22: 19
    Quote: antikilller55
    We don’t get into brothers, you want to leave, go yourself, just don’t get burned on this.

    Yeah, some have already separated, and have one foot in Europe, but standing upright is uncomfortable, your legs are numb.
  87. +4
    3 February 2017 23: 09
    Shura Bulba hit his head from the puck, apparently it jammed. The Russian Federation introduced customs on the border with Belarus only for third countries. By his decree, he canceled visas to Belarus for more than 60 countries, the Russian Federation is obliged to do this for the safety of its citizens, and Belarusians can freely cross the border i.e. travel to the Russian Federation without hindrance. Lukashenko himself is going to confrontation, apparently he sold himself to the EU for a ten-kopeck piece, apparently they promised something. damn the accomplice of our enemies under sanctions, the smart-ass, re-exports sanctioned products from the EU by replacing the tags with his own, has anyone seen the ocean in Belarus or made in Belarus on bananas and etc., he idiotically wants to sit on two chairs like Yanukovosch, that one’s asshole is loose, and this one’s will probably split into three parts.
  88. 0
    3 February 2017 23: 20
    Lukashenko explained the situation
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=8HboJ-dnUYo
  89. 0
    3 February 2017 23: 22
    And then Ostap suffered belay
  90. +4
    3 February 2017 23: 54
    I don’t want to comment on this sheer nonsense that commentators have written here! The article is BROKEN in order to finally dismember the two fraternal peoples. Russians read Regnum and the media, watch TV, drink beer and YOU will be happy. THERE IS NO MONEY, BUT YOU HOLD ON - HURRAYS COMRADES.
    1. +1
      5 February 2017 02: 15
      Quote: Starik72
      The article is BROKEN in order to finally dismember the two fraternal peoples.

      Greetings as the future "Bulba-Bandera" future "Bulba-Bandera".
      It is sad to realize that, unfortunately, a lot is moving in this direction.
      Including these stuffing, starting with articles about the Belarusian Donbass in 2015.
      Very, very sorry.
  91. +1
    3 February 2017 23: 56
    Quote: vasek5533
    one yacht less your oligarchs stand, that’s the price of helping Belarus .... naive people, they think something will fall if they press the Old Man.


    What do the oligarchs have to do with it? Do you think they deduct a discount for you from their profits?! Then they are not oligarchs but idiots)) there are no such things, and it seems to me that someone else is naive here
  92. +1
    3 February 2017 23: 58
    I prefer to see my brother in relation to myself...and not by birth. and so he is not Old Man. he is a fucking Makhnovist.
  93. 0
    4 February 2017 00: 36
    It has every right.
  94. 0
    4 February 2017 01: 24
    Quote: caa
    Quote: victorrat
    Lukashenko completely played up. I am writing to Belarusians: What is going on with you? Belarus for Belarusians? Do you want to become Nazis? They write: Everything is calm. And so they slowly turn into b ..


    And where are you, in fact, and why are you writing?))) Here are the addresses for you, open news related to Russia and read comments. These are the 2 most popular resources: 99,9% of the audience. Representativeness is exceptional. Draw conclusions.
    tut.by
    onliner.by


    I read it, and judging by the comments and likes, the Minsk Maidan is not so impossible...
  95. +1
    4 February 2017 01: 42
    Quote: Ilja2016
    There are so many defenders of Russian oligarchs on the site.


    And why can’t all the sick Russophobes write and speak the word Russia normally? Do you think it's more offensive? It's time to get out of 10 years old))
  96. 0
    4 February 2017 01: 50
    http://antifashist.com/item/lukashenko-majdan-eto
    -pozor-dlya-ukrainy.html?comitet

    Calm down already
  97. +3
    4 February 2017 03: 17
    It is necessary to recall how Lukashenko decided to ban the St. George’s ribbon on May 9.
  98. +2
    4 February 2017 03: 46
    What can I say... Lukashenko is still a schemer. In essence, he sells friendship for money; whoever offers the most becomes friends with him.
    1. +2
      4 February 2017 10: 04
      Lie ! Lukashenko defends the interests of his country, his citizens, including economic ones....and not the size of the wallets of Russian oligarchs.
      Or, in your opinion, if you took out a loan, that means you’re already a beggar? All of Russia is on loans and investments..
      Our people in the government only pray to them...
      The ruble exchange rate and foreign investments - we don’t hear anything more from them...
      For them, the Zenit Arena and the World Cup are more important than the size of pensions and the development of their own industry.
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 10: 08
        I subscribe to every word. I agree 100.....
      2. +1
        4 February 2017 14: 57
        Well, you don’t need to make money by fraud, but by producing products and selling them.
  99. +2
    4 February 2017 06: 53
    Quote: Matak
    In order for the average citizen in Russia to live 3 times better than a resident of Belarus, it is necessary to stop spending money on the Syrian adventure and significantly reduce military spending.

    Israeli military spending in 2015 amounted to $16,1 billion for a population of 8,5 million, that is, about 2 raccoons per capita. Military expenditures of the Russian Federation - 000 billion per 66 million, 145 raccoons each. So who needs to sew up the aggressor’s mouth 455 times in order to reduce costs at least to the level of the Russian Federation? Maybe first you should stop participating in the Syrian adventure, otherwise a lot of shekels are being spent on medicines for the Allayavbars?
  100. 0
    4 February 2017 07: 43
    It's hard to sit on two chairs....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"