"We do not need a Russian base, we need Russian planes"

208
During his press conference, which is called the “big talk,” the president of Belarus continues to “burn with napalm.” And most of the "napalm" from Alexander Lukashenko goes to the Russian Federation, which is a strategic partner of the Republic of Belarus. After a statement that he had appealed to the Ministry of Internal Affairs regarding the need to initiate a criminal case against the head of the Rosselkhoznadzor, Dankvert, Lukashenko said that Belarus "is suing Russia for reducing the supply of oil."

At the same time, Lukashenko did not specify in which court exactly the issue of reducing the supply of “black gold” from Russia to Belarus is being considered.



"We do not need a Russian base, we need Russian planes"


Then Lukashenko announced that he was opposed to the deployment of a Russian air base on the Belarusian territory.

RIA News quotes Lukashenko's statement:
They say the military base ... Come on, who needs these 10 airplanes that Russia wanted to land in Bobruisk. We have excellent pilots, we have a great school, you know that we are no worse at war on military aircraft.


And here Lukashenka didn’t specify when the last time Belarusian pilots (with all due respect) “fought” on military planes and against whom “hostilities” were fought ...

Then Lukashenka started talking again about the “blocked road for Belarusian goods”. From his statement:
What are you doing? Why are you blocking Belarusian goods? We need to sell it in order to pay you for oil and gas, I always talk about it.


After that, Lukashenko added that if between the two countries “there is an abyss, then it will have to fall asleep for decades; there will be neither Putin nor Lukashenko, and we will leave all this to the children ... ”
  • http://www.belta.by
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

208 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +32
    3 February 2017 14: 18
    "We do not need a Russian base, we need Russian planes"
    And then dad suffered! We are in Sochi too, only the sanatorium "Belarus" in Krasnaya Polyana is needed! Without dad's stupid manners, to block traffic 3-4 hours
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 14: 24
      And he actually is there ... but not in Krasnaya Polyana itself ...
      Quote: Observer2014
      "We do not need a Russian base, we need Russian planes"
      And then dad suffered! We are in Sochi too, only the sanatorium "Belarus" in Krasnaya Polyana is needed! Without dad's stupid manners, to block traffic 3-4 hours
      1. +7
        3 February 2017 14: 27
        210ox hi God forbid, when there, here, in the wash, the daddy came laughing This is transcendental chaos! Even our traffic cops are shocked laughing
        1. +5
          3 February 2017 14: 30
          Quite right, when a cortege, even those close to the Belarusian president, is driving from the Adler airport ... THIS IS CHAOS ...
          Quote: Observer2014
          210ox hi God forbid, when there, here, in the wash, the daddy came laughing This is transcendental chaos! Even our traffic cops are shocked laughing
          1. +28
            3 February 2017 14: 46
            Something, recently the dad is very similar to Edorgan

            Speaks loudly and squints in all directions


            1. +6
              3 February 2017 17: 28
              Megalomania.
              But in essence, Lukashenko understands that he wouldn’t be anywhere without us, and so he doesn’t want to, now he is likened to ghouls that occupied the neighboring land.
              The elders said that Belarus would disappear for a while, but the gulping goryushka, like a beaten dog, like a prodigal daughter, would return home.
              Apparently, the Belarusian spiral begins to shrink.
              1. 0
                3 February 2017 20: 34
                I don't believe it ..
                1. +1
                  4 February 2017 18: 43
                  oooo, but where are our "giants of thought", a year ago worshiping the "crappy business owner and defender of his people, who does not spare the belly of the Swago", who sang laudatory odes to the mustachioed freak, and any criticism of the AG was perceived as Svidomism, Western bias and betrayal of the motherland, ayuu ! Where are you ??? also express your opinion about the order to arrest the head of the Rosselkhoznadzor, with the wording about causing harm and damage to Belarus, and I would like to hear their opinion about the statements of the AG that brotherly Ukraine is fighting for its independence
              2. +1
                4 February 2017 00: 51
                Quote: Alena Frolovna
                The elders said that Belarus would disappear for a while, but the gulping goryushka, like a beaten dog, like a prodigal daughter, would return home.

                yes, these elders generally said a lot
                and apocalypse in 2012
                and 44-th US president will be the last
                well and the rest
                so I wouldn’t really trust them
                but it’s not always clear to the person who conducted the press conference what he said
                but about vodka on spring water
                1. +2
                  4 February 2017 05: 44
                  and apocalypse in 2012
                  and 44-th US president will be the last
                  well and the rest
                  so I wouldn’t really trust them
                  but it’s not always clear to the person who conducted the press conference what he said
                  but about vodka on spring water


                  this is your favorite wang chatting, and you, stupid and believe.
                  Not a single old man said that 44 was the last, but only this crazy blind.
                  1. 0
                    4 February 2017 18: 41
                    there it seems like Indian curses were pulled in))
                  2. 0
                    4 February 2017 19: 05
                    Quote: Alena Frolovna
                    chatted, but you fools believe.

                    here here
                    they all talk like that
                    something comes true in the end
                    well, if it’s not forgotten - the future is shaky and it is not given to despicable mortals to know it, or something like that
              3. +5
                9 February 2017 13: 21
                why send the whole of Belarus to the slaughter, it's easier to put this old goat on the drum, it is no longer suitable for more, sly-ass
    2. +66
      3 February 2017 14: 27
      At first glance, it sounds quite convincing, but it looks like blackmail again, now by children and grandchildren. If good planes and pilots - for God's sake! But the point is that we supply these very planes for free (and then serve them) to the Belarusian armed forces and then they will protect us, this is friendship! And in general, oil is a rotten topic. If Belarusians bought purely for themselves - but no problem, but the trouble is that their eyes are bigger than their own stomachs, there will be 10 Belarusians, + all the fuel is being driven to Ukraine in full - and then they fill up the tanks with them. That's the whole alignment. I'm not even talking about their "solidarity" with Russia in terms of counter-sanctions, be healthy! So all this friendship is good while the money is dripping ...
      1. avt
        +18
        3 February 2017 15: 07
        Quote: maxim947
        Sounds pretty convincing at first glance,

        what I would believe in
        We have excellent pilots, we have an excellent school, you know that we are as good at fighting on military aircraft.
        , if Batska added - "I myself am wounded on the Kolchak fronts." bully
        What are you doing? Why are you blocking Belarusian goods? We need to sell it in order to pay you for oil and gas, I always talk about it.
        BUT! At a fair price set by Batskaya himself. bully Zadornov can not be in a hurry to return to the stage, let him calmly heal, the holy place is no longer empty. bully
        1. +1
          4 February 2017 00: 52
          Quote: avt
          , if Batska added - "I myself am wounded on the Kolchak fronts."

          on which fronts he is wounded, it seems like the most important secret wink
      2. 0
        5 February 2017 13: 56
        with such friends and enemies it is not necessary ...
    3. +41
      3 February 2017 14: 27
      Quote: Observer2014
      And then dad suffered!

      Something tells me that in the near future my father will suddenly retire, as was the case with Khrushchev. It hurts a lot lately to vote towards the Russian Federation. As I have said more than once, an attempt to sit on three chairs leads to the fact that the ass is torn and it is good if along, or maybe across, bypassing all physical laws.
      1. +3
        3 February 2017 14: 37
        Quote: NEXUS

        Something tells me that in the near future my father will suddenly retire, as was the case with Khrushchev.
        Is there your own Brezhnev? Doubtful.
        1. +3
          3 February 2017 14: 38
          Quote: Pushkar
          Is there your own Brezhnev? Doubtful.

          And what are our special services for?
          1. +19
            3 February 2017 14: 40
            And what were they for in Ukraine until 2014?
            1. +6
              3 February 2017 14: 43
              they sawed bablishko and wrote bravura reports from Moscow
            2. +11
              3 February 2017 14: 44
              Quote: Pushkar
              And what were they for in Ukraine until 2014?

              And who in general dealt with Ukraine, if all the way we were voicing about the sovereign expression of the will of the citizens of Ukraine? This is now, when the roasted rooster pecked, after the Maidan, they began to scratch their turnips and do something.
              1. +11
                3 February 2017 15: 30
                Ukraine was then dealt with Medvedv D.M. and Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Russian Federation Mr. (in the sense of "condom") Zurabov M.N. fool
          2. +13
            3 February 2017 14: 46
            "The right" path is the dad, the path of the Yaneka.
            1. +6
              3 February 2017 15: 06
              Yes Yes ! very similar . that for not having done nothing, but for having done a lot. but we had to drive him away from the feeder before. maybe it's not too late. in Belarus, dope in their heads no less than in Ukraine. there were demonstrations and they shouted: we don’t want to go to Russia. we will fight. yes on x .... all of them. what we ? what do we have from them? let them live as they want. enough to drag everyone by force. minimum attention. prices are for everyone. until they crawl on their knees. how they like to say it. hi
              1. +5
                3 February 2017 15: 31
                there is an impression that we are always correcting / solving the consequences. although initially we see the reason and wait: maybe it will. with Janek it has already "carried", we need to farce the decision, the second orange plague already in Belarus may already be, if not fatal, then very painful.
              2. +1
                3 February 2017 17: 58
                let them live as they want. Enough to drag everyone. minimum attention. prices for everyone. until they crawl on their knees. as they like to say it.
                you see what's the matter. I would agree with you. if not for the conclusions you came to. this is exactly the kind of slamming doors that our worst "partners" want us to do. as they themselves say openly, they see their task in preventing unification processes in general and in the post-Soviet space in particular, and Lukashenka as a representative of the specific elite of the collapsed USSR on their side. but you can't just turn away. we will get another aggressively hostile country on the borders, and the separative activity will not stop, it will simply be transferred inside Russia. do we need it?
            2. 0
              3 February 2017 15: 29
              Only the path towards The Hague, they will gladly accept him there.
            3. 0
              3 February 2017 18: 10
              Quote: newbie
              "The right" path is the dad, the path of the Yaneka.

              he is not the first. I have not heard about the good results of such walks, but constantly someone hopes that he will be the first.
          3. +1
            3 February 2017 16: 02
            Ride on "geliks". laughing tongue lol
          4. +1
            3 February 2017 16: 05
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: Pushkar
            Is there your own Brezhnev? Doubtful.

            And what are our special services for?

            Ride on "geliks". laughing tongue lol
        2. +2
          3 February 2017 14: 52
          who knows who exactly will be found on this Khrushchev ... Brezhnev is, by the way, the most affectionate case ... but if Beria?
          1. +3
            3 February 2017 15: 33
            Well, if Lavrenty Palych comes, then there will be no problems from the word at all! remember the atomic project, and he also supervised the development of the space program ...
      2. 0
        3 February 2017 20: 14
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: Observer2014
        And then dad suffered!

        Something tells me that in the near future my father will suddenly retire, as was the case with Khrushchev. It hurts a lot lately to vote towards the Russian Federation. As I have said more than once, an attempt to sit on three chairs leads to the fact that the ass is torn and it is good if along, or maybe across, bypassing all physical laws.

        And who will leave him? Everything is captured there, however, as well as with us.
    4. +7
      3 February 2017 15: 14
      The authors of the post took some excerpts from the speech. At the expense of the military base. First, he talked about how unnecessary it is. Then he went over to criticize the opposition, who said that Russia is an enemy, will repeat the Crimean scenario, he also spoke about future joint exercises. This is a subtle hint at the reason for the abandonment of the military base, so that the opposition and the public (and not only :)) do not excite. Do you think the people of the Republic of Belarus in the majority have a good attitude towards Russia, imagine their reaction if there was a real military base, so that his decision may even be beneficial. And at the expense of air defense, if you didn't know, the Detection Point in the Republic of Bashkortostan has recently started working, (I don’t know the details), but it seems to close most of it, in the Russian Federation they wanted to implement this for a long time.
      1. +5
        3 February 2017 16: 25
        Quote: Ivanbesmert
        Do you think the people of the Republic of Belarus in the majority have a good attitude towards Russia, imagine their reaction if there was a real military base, so that his decision may even be beneficial.

        Explain.
        1. +1
          3 February 2017 16: 54
          This is a hint that we have no brothers. But we are no strangers, we will cope ourselves as always and at all times.
      2. +8
        3 February 2017 17: 18
        I have no doubt that they don't treat Russia well in the former republics of the USSR, that's why I want to have a visa regime between the Russian Federation and all the former republics of the USSR, return the column `` nationality '' to the passport and give the non-indigenous population of Russia so much rights in Russia, how many Russians have in your republics, and nothing more. So it will be fair.
    5. +7
      3 February 2017 15: 20
      Observer

      Yes, there’s no, he’s wearing an old man.

      Here's the GDP, messed up.

      This is in my superficial opinion, without going into details.

      What's the problem?

      The problem is as follows.

      There is a union agreement between the two countries. The agreement includes various areas of relationship. Economic, political, military.
      Russia is the basis of the contract, as it influences the formation of contractual volumes.
      It turns out that there is a contract, and the conditions are constantly changing from the wishes of the main partner. Simply because the partner is larger and prioritizes his interests.

      First, let's start with the main thing. The main thing is the economic system that dominates the settlement between market participants, the well-known and problematic capitalism. The basis of the system is competition. Competition for material resources. It is impossible to guarantee with absolute certainty that the parties to the transaction will find themselves in a bilateral advantageous position.

      Lukashenko felt that he could not cope with his economy, due to circumstances and changing conditions. Therefore, he began to signal his problems at the political level. At the level where he can have an opportunity, influence.

      Already in this article you can see what the problem is.

      Do you all remember how the GDP said that the world needs to increase the price of oil, so the price of oil is approaching the prime cost mark? Russia, like many other countries, trades in natural resources, oil. GDP, said that the OPEC countries should lower oil production in order to raise the price and Russia will support this organization. Russia has fulfilled its promise. The price went up. And she received a political warning from Lukashenka.

      There is a contract. This contract should not be influenced by the price of oil and its production. Crappy capitalism, not capitalism, and each of the partners is obliged to fulfill their part of the conditions. And don't give a damn about your problems.

      Output.

      The economic system does not provide guarantees for partnerships. This relationship cannot be left to chance. You need constant "manual control". In Russia, officials did not cope with the work due to the administrative decision of the president, GDP. A planned economy cannot react flexibly to the actions of its participants. The planned economy is a guarantee of partnership. A planned economy will always have contradictions with a market one.
      1. +13
        3 February 2017 15: 33
        Quote: gladcu2
        Here's the GDP, messed up.

        Is Russia to blame again? You will already announce the list of which we are not to blame. I think it will be very short for you.
        1. +4
          3 February 2017 17: 47
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          You will announce the list, for which we are not to blame

          Sasha, I’ve announced almost the entire post below, you’ll have a desire to get acquainted in more detail in the search engine "This is Putin" and you will be happy laughing Hello Far East drinks !
      2. +5
        3 February 2017 16: 35
        Do not carry nonsense. You argue like all politicians in the West, some must fulfill the contract, while others do not. In this case, the dad does not even half of his part of the contract. Such allies are not needed.
      3. +3
        3 February 2017 17: 21
        Partnership relations are mutually beneficial relations, and when these relations are reduced to sucking money and other freebies from Russia, then Russia does not need such a relationship.
      4. +2
        3 February 2017 17: 23
        It was Russia that came up with a delusional "fair gas price of $ 80", at which the chairman wants to buy it ??? Iago's eminence has been bringing in something a lot lately, Luka says in Russian. And he is bored because he doesn’t agree with his credit, and for example, dating s / x (to maintain dumping prices for the same milk) is becoming more and more difficult. Russia certainly did not violate any agreements, but Belarus does not repay debts for the supplied hydrocarbons. And what side is Putin here?
      5. +1
        3 February 2017 17: 43
        Dear gladcu2, as you rightly noted, there are different agreements "Economic, political, military". There are also business, commercial contracts with volumes, prices, terms, etc., which must be fulfilled by all parties who have signed an agreement with different planned, market economies. Do not confuse the principles that are declared in the agreements "Economic, political, military" and specific commercial transactions.
      6. +5
        3 February 2017 17: 45
        Quote: gladcu2
        Yes, there’s no, he’s wearing an old man.
        Here's the GDP, messed up.

        Zadolbal already this hit with different melodies but the same text "Rain and hail outside the window. It's Putin's fault!
        The cat left the kittens - Putin is to blame,
        Mistress threw a hare - Guilty, guess!
        Here comes the board The unfortunate goby,
        Our Tanya cries loudly - Nearby Putin, not otherwise!
        The light went out, the fence fell, The car stalled motor,
        Healthy tooth removed Ile climbed into the apartment thief,
        I didn’t like the movie. You’ve come to shit ...
        Any cataclysm has one explanation ...
        Every democrat knows - Putin is to blame! "
        and further in the text ..... Lukashenko is looking for a freebie, but he doesn’t know where and before whom they will bend, and all this nonsense of him is attempts of petty blackmail. Looks like pollen from the country 404 not only hovers over its territory but also reaches Minsk. . That's the whole philosophy of these twists of the owner of a fraternal country.
      7. 0
        3 February 2017 23: 08
        Everything, in my opinion, is much simpler - it was no shit to resell oil with such a margin, getting it at the same time almost cheaper than the cost price;
        RB introduces visa-free travel for 80 countries, which is why ours are building a border, but not from Belarus, but from those countries; ours impose restrictions on the import of beef from the Republic of Belarus.
      8. 0
        4 February 2017 02: 28
        To be honest, I didn't understand a damn thing.
    6. +2
      3 February 2017 15: 45
      Quote: Observer2014
      "We do not need a Russian base, we need Russian planes"
      And then dad suffered! We are in Sochi too, only the sanatorium "Belarus" in Krasnaya Polyana is needed! Without dad's stupid manners, to block traffic 3-4 hours

      We have a rich country,
      And oil, and gas, and granite chips.
      What about Belarusians?
      Of the fossils - one potato.
      1. +3
        3 February 2017 19: 47
        "From fossils - one potato" ////

        Japan doesn't even have that. But this did not prevent it from becoming one of the most developed countries in the world. And South Korea has no fossils. And Switzerland.
        And thank God!
        Minerals - gold nose ring. Cool, but it hurts. And no development ...
        It is the lack of minerals that should be the "engine" of Belarus.
        If you do not expect "weather from the sea". They've already done something: they've learned how to write software well.
        World of Tanks is more profitable than all tractors.
        Electronic military devices. But in order to get rich, you need to enter international markets - to work together with Silicon Valley.
        1. +1
          3 February 2017 20: 23
          Quote: voyaka uh
          "From fossils - one potato" ////

          Japan doesn't even have that. But this did not prevent it from becoming one of the most developed countries in the world. And South Korea has no fossils. And Switzerland.
          And thank God!
          Minerals - gold nose ring. Cool, but it hurts. And no development ...
          It is the lack of minerals that should be the "engine" of Belarus.
          If you do not expect "weather from the sea". They've already done something: they've learned how to write software well.
          World of Tanks is more profitable than all tractors.
          Electronic military devices. But in order to get rich, you need to enter international markets - to work together with Silicon Valley.

          Even on the old resource, I wrote about the fact that the natural wealth of Russia is its curse at all times. This corrupts both the government and the people demanding preferences, literally let the territory remain, but the bowels will be empty. And then either we are fools or really the economy will appear, and certainly all the filth from the government will be washed away.
        2. 0
          5 February 2017 14: 13
          voyaka uh 3 February 2017 19:47
          It is the lack of minerals that should be the "engine" of Belarus.

          something dragged on for Belarus with the formation of a technological power, 25 years have already passed, and not like everyone will not become a "motor", probably the damned maskals are to blame ...

          Electronic military devices. But in order to get rich, you need to enter international markets - to work together with Silicon Valley.

          they were waiting for them, they just sleep and see "orphans" in the technology parks of the USA, India, China ...

          Jews, as always with their condescending "advice", appear when a crisis manager is needed ...
  2. +19
    3 February 2017 14: 20
    It's alarming somehow. It seems that the old man has really blown the roof off.
    1. +9
      3 February 2017 14: 22
      When they are deprived of a "little" gesheft, they will blow their roof off.
    2. 0
      3 February 2017 14: 23
      The division of cash flows at the state level is a special thing.
      1. +7
        3 February 2017 14: 49
        "We do not need a Russian base, we need Russian planes"

        And I don't need you yourself. I need your money. Gopota, damn it
  3. +6
    3 February 2017 14: 24
    The impression is that everything is so bad that he went crazy. There is no clear line of conduct.
  4. +19
    3 February 2017 14: 25
    let the F-35 buy now
  5. +18
    3 February 2017 14: 25
    Any diplomacy can be successful only if the interests of the high contracting parties are taken into account. Lkashenko has no idea that Russia, like Belarus, has any interests and that they need to be taken into account. Give me the money, period.
    1. +4
      3 February 2017 15: 01
      And here it seems to us that it is the other way around ... but what do you know about the interests of Belarus? but nothing, because you think, "Come on, the point." That's how we live.
      1. +4
        3 February 2017 15: 20
        Quote: vasek5533
        And here it seems to us that it is the other way around ... but what do you know about the interests of Belarus? but nothing, because you think, "Come on, the point." That's how we live.

        What interests can Belarus have? Do you get money? Subsidies? You need to download rights when you are not dependent on anyone. Do not like no one holds and hello onality of Ukraine.
      2. +3
        3 February 2017 15: 25
        What do you know about Russia's interests? hi
      3. +7
        3 February 2017 15: 31
        Quote: vasek5533
        What do you know about the interests of Belarus?

        Can you Vasek 5533 tell us in detail about the interests of Belarus, maybe we misunderstand?
        If I'm wrong, then correct me!
        The reform of the economy is stalled, but you need money. Your goods are not competitive on the world market. You take funds from loans (I looked at your debts), often from Russia, "vparivanie" your goods to Russia (although you can buy others), export Fuels and lubricants obtained from Russian oil (sold at a huge discount), and transit (the fee for which the old man increases), and finally, the sale of goods from Europe (which Russia has banned). Maybe refute at least one of the points! Interests of Belarus, money is needed, but we need them too! hi
        1. +3
          3 February 2017 15: 44
          In addition, due to the transit of European goods, the resulting quality of your products goes to zero. I used to take your sour cream with pleasure. Not now. And not because politics is to blame.
        2. +4
          3 February 2017 19: 52
          "The reform of your economy is stalling, but you need money. Your goods are uncompetitively capable of the world market." ////

          Stunned! One economic lagging behind with GDP growth in the red - Russia teaches another outsider - Belarus - how to live .... As if Russia is competitive on the world market.
          1. +3
            3 February 2017 21: 02
            Quote: voyaka uh
            As if Russia is competitive in the world market.

            But we make rockets ... fellow feel
          2. +1
            3 February 2017 21: 14
            And we are talking specifically about Belarus. After all, the goods of Belarus are made specifically for the Russian market, no one else needs them. And we have problems, but we do not solve them at the expense of others. And our goods, which, according to you, are "uncompetitive" we ourselves consume, and that at the level of world standards (and higher), for example, weapons, reactors, we supply abroad (market, contests, exhibitions). And we certainly MUST buy their products for Belarusians! hi
            PC-and with the growth of GDP, we somehow cope, only there would be fewer such "friends and allies", otherwise the USSR "fed" half of the world and overstrained! Yes
          3. 0
            5 February 2017 14: 23
            Quote: voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 3 Feb 2017 19:52 ↑
            "The reform of your economy is stalling, but you need money. Your goods are uncompetitively capable of the world market." ////

            Stunned! One economic lagging behind with GDP growth in the red - Russia teaches another outsider - Belarus - how to live .... As if Russia is competitive on the world market.


            Are we throwing everything non-competitive on the world market? Why then do your senior comrades come to Moscow so that we do not sell another batch of "non-competitive" products to Iran and the SAR? for ...... whether already with their indulgence, the "motors" of the world economy ...
            You differ from RB in that you can do something with someone else's raw materials (you will never have your own), but RB does not ...
            Just think about what you will do with sanctions against your country and the lack of raw materials ...
      4. +6
        3 February 2017 15: 34
        Quote: vasek5533
        And here it seems to us that the opposite is true ... but what do you know about the interests of Belarus?

        We know that half of the country your shrimps and red fish eat
        1. 0
          4 February 2017 04: 40
          Alexander Romanov Yesterday, 15:34 ↑
          Quote: vasek5533
          And here it seems to us that the opposite is true ... but what do you know about the interests of Belarus?
          We know that half of the country your shrimps and red fish eat

          And also apples, deliveries of which exceed the volume of the grown crop by 5 times.
      5. +3
        3 February 2017 15: 45
        what do you know about the interests of Belarus?

        There are other problems with Father. Russia could probably reduce gas prices. But violation of the contract with Gazprom. This will be a precedent. Then other consumers will start making demands and breaking contracts. In this case, Old Man at least take loans, at least get them out of the chest, but pay according to the contract. As an option, we will build a base, and we will pay the difference in gas as for rent. So far, your Old Man has a lot of problems, but Russia will not agree to a precedent for breaking a contract. Gazprom has a lot of lawsuits and violation of the contract with Belarus plays against Gazprom. It doesn't reach your Old Man.
      6. +2
        3 February 2017 15: 58
        Quote: vasek5533
        And here it seems to us

        And you are baptized there sometimes. More often, after all, Great Lent is on the nose. You look, it will cease to seem. And there, crossing yourself, you will understand that even the Urkain version does not shine for you. You just go to grease without Russia, along with daddy and Kolenka. Nobody needs you with your Byalorus. The maksimka courted his neighbors, gave money for betrayal. You WILL NOT GIVE ANYTHING! You just won't be there. And ... with you.
        1. +1
          3 February 2017 18: 17
          Quote: 97110
          Nobody needs you with your Byalorus. The maksimka courted his neighbors, gave money for betrayal. You WILL NOT GIVE ANYTHING! You just won't be there. And ... with you.

          and why are we so happy?
          1. 0
            3 February 2017 21: 40
            Quote: kashtak
            and why are we so happy?

            Better such a joy than living on our money and waiting for the moment when the price of our sale is maximum. Erdogan's example is also important for Russia. A NATO member, not RB in any position, has been put in a position by simple economic measures. Father doesn't read newspapers? He, with his own hands, introduces the Turkish regime for himself. Either he will come to his senses, or we are so happy that a traitor will be drawn.
      7. 0
        3 February 2017 16: 01
        And here on the site everyone posts, the Belarusians do not like it, go to the gentlemen, there they set the conditions. But you won't trade any more and you won't get any raw materials.
        Life is a choice. So choose. Ukrainians have already chosen!
        1. avt
          +6
          3 February 2017 16: 47
          Quote: demos1111
          Ukrainians have already chosen!

          With what they are in this nezalezhny choice and congratulations.
          Quote: demos1111
          go to the gentlemen, there you will set the conditions for them.

          Well, the Poles are so trampled, they will come to panic, but you go to the Chinese who lent you, roll out about "justice" in non-repayment of debt and "I do not trade in souvryanitet" and so on by type
          Eggs crash today
          and the bells delight the soul.
          And the proletarians of all countries unite
          around the Easter table.
          Let your Butt, instead of paying off the debts, sing to the Chinese
          All people are brothers! I will hug a Chinese man
          hi to Mao Zedong
          he will send his yellow eggs to me,
          I'll give him my reds.
          And we ... are so bad
          Quote: demos1111
          And here on the site everyone posts,

          we wish to listen to the answer bully
      8. 0
        3 February 2017 16: 34
        Quote: vasek5533
        What do you know about the interests of Belarus?

        What interests might you have? Your main interest is that people live well and freely. That is money.
        Maybe you want to participate in geopolitics?
      9. +3
        3 February 2017 17: 25
        You have a lot of wishes, but the feedback from you is zero. It is time for Russia to isolate itself from the former USSR and forget about all of you as if it were a bad dream.
      10. 0
        3 February 2017 19: 19
        https://news.tut.by/economics/530200.html
    2. 0
      3 February 2017 18: 15
      Quote: koshmarik
      Lkashenko has no idea that Russia, like Belarus, has any interests and that they need to be taken into account.

      he just could not rise above the level of the manager of the collective farm.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +15
    3 February 2017 14: 26
    I would like to Old Man and "eat the fish and count the net"!
    I would like Russia to give money, but he would remain independent.
  8. +3
    3 February 2017 14: 27
    Have you ever wondered why the United States finds a common language with everyone and under them half of the world, while Russia cannot establish contacts with anyone?
    1. +7
      3 February 2017 14: 29
      State your version. I absolutely do not understand why this is so.
    2. +31
      3 February 2017 14: 35
      It's simple. The US is acting from a position of strength. And we are from the position of a kind word. But as you know, a kind word and a pistol can achieve more than just a kind word. Well, the economy again ...
      1. +1
        4 February 2017 07: 12
        It looks like a position of strength is a hundred times more effective.
    3. +5
      3 February 2017 14: 55
      There are no cookies and we don't throw bombs anywhere laughing
    4. 0
      3 February 2017 15: 01
      http://el-murid.livejournal.com/3109686.html
    5. +3
      3 February 2017 15: 35
      Quote: Nikolai Bolotnikov
      Have you ever wondered why the United States finds a common language with everyone and under them half of the world, while Russia cannot establish contacts with anyone?

      Russia has a different approach. The USA is stupidly buying the top and that's it.
      1. +1
        3 February 2017 16: 10
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        The US is stupidly buying the top and that's it.

        It's not stupid. It is effective. And what, our top is not for sale? Just now, a solid federal minister was revealed to us, personally carrying a small suitcase with dollars. 2 lemma for me even in rubles is a lot. And for his status, it is indecent personally. Or do you hope that it was only for Sechin that he came down, and if the Americans were there, he would take it three times and personally, no, no? Would you trust the driver?
        1. +1
          3 February 2017 16: 53
          Quote: 97110
          It's not stupid. It is effective.

          This is disgusting, then you have to lie a lot to the United States and those whom they bought. Since you condemn them for lying, don't talk about efficiency, otherwise I'll start thinking that you support their lies.
          Quote: 97110
          And what, our top is not for sale?

          90s are over
    6. +2
      3 February 2017 15: 38
      Because the dollar is a simple colored piece of paper, with a cost of $ 0,10, and is sold for money backed by gold. That's the whole "language".
    7. +3
      3 February 2017 15: 51
      And the United States with those who do not want to find a common language with them - the issue is decided by bombers ...
    8. +6
      3 February 2017 17: 28
      The United States does not feed anyone, in contrast to Moscow, which still cannot play enough with pimply internationalism. The United States has a short conversation with such Lukashenkos, they drive the aircraft carrier and arrange a coup, with a demonstrative chopping of the `` tyrant '' into pieces with axes with the hands of `` patriots ''
  9. +9
    3 February 2017 14: 27
    Maybe someone else will be found from Lukashenka's defenders and will explain to us, not distant, that this is our close ally and "brother"
    1. +14
      3 February 2017 15: 10
      He is not your brother, he is on his own. Your brothers, these are the people of Belarus. So get your dad down ... he will not live worse, but the population ... in Ukraine you are no longer "brothers".
      1. +2
        3 February 2017 16: 14
        Quote: vasek5533
        in Ukraine you are no longer "brothers".

        Do you want to too? Ah, people
        Quote: vasek5533
        Belarus
        ? You are brave, are you ready to spite Putin and ride the country for the glory of Trump?
      2. +1
        3 February 2017 17: 20
        Quote: vasek5533
        in Ukraine you are no longer “brothers”

        So what? In Russia, in connection with this, has life become worse?

        And in general, you can’t be a brother for cash. And Old Man wants just that.
      3. +3
        3 February 2017 17: 32
        Yes, we are `` brothers '' to you only while you are eating our bread, and even with that you are unhappy. You live at your place, at your own expense, and not at our expense, as you can, together with Ukraine. Separated from Russia, so live on your own. She died, so she died.
      4. +2
        3 February 2017 17: 32
        Quote: vasek5533
        in Ukraine you are no longer "brothers".

        It seems to me that 2-3 months of broadcasting on all TV channels in the right way, a little (on a national scale) money for the development of the agricultural sector of the economy, an order for a certain amount of some crap available for production in Ukraine, and all svidomye swing on lampposts and Kiev chestnuts. Or they will be strapped to fences with a dung fork. And in the center of Kiev a huge monument will be erected to the prince of Moscow, Kiev and different, different ... Vladimir.
      5. 0
        5 February 2017 14: 31
        Quote: vasek5533
        He is not your brother, he is on his own. Your brothers, these are the people of Belarus. So get your dad down ... he will not live worse, but the population ... in Ukraine you are no longer "brothers".


        the difference is that we were not brothers for the Ukrainians back in the late 80s, and they are just now ...
  10. +44
    3 February 2017 14: 28
    I read the dad’s statements and I have a feeling that it’s not Senka’s hat, he doesn’t have strategic thinking, he thinks at the level of the collective farm chairman, who, because of the fact that the neighboring collective farm did not give diesel fuel, jumped into conceit: - YES you ! Yes, I am now! And I won’t let your cows into my meadow! And our milkmaids will not go to your dances anymore! - This is precisely the level of the collective farm chairman, and not the leader of the country. hi
    1. +3
      3 February 2017 14: 52
      Quote: major071
      I read the statements of my father and I have a feeling that

      and I'm yours, Major, I read, and the feeling that there is no rhyme ... laughing drinks
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 02: 57
        But as in an old joke: x ....... you will break free.
    2. +1
      3 February 2017 15: 28
      Toaarish Major! Is it possible in poetry? You're good at drinks
      1. +10
        3 February 2017 15: 45
        No, brothers, this is not the topic, and the aunt has already left, which is called the Muse. Maybe tomorrow he will look at the light, or maybe in a week. Moody, and does not like to walk in the snowdrifts. wink So I'm hibernating laughing drinks
  11. +3
    3 February 2017 14: 29
    In general, Russia does not need the CSTO or the Customs Union under current conditions! The only thing you need is Belarusian dairy products ...
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 15: 36
      Yesterday I was at the market and saw Belarusian products. A whole department was opened, but there were no buyers. Prices are at least twice as high. Opposite the local cheeses. There is something to compare. I took the sausage to try, now we share with the dog.
      1. +6
        3 February 2017 16: 12
        If the dog eats it means good sausage. It would be worse if the dog didn't eat. laughing
        1. +4
          3 February 2017 17: 23
          Yes, like a dog and "pedigree" (God forgive me) is eating ... laughing So now gobble it up with her?
      2. +1
        3 February 2017 17: 51
        As the USSR collapsed, so in Russia they immediately stopped making Condensed milk according to GOST - all Russian Condensed milk garbage ... But Rogachevskaya Super!
        1. 0
          5 February 2017 14: 46
          Smolenskaya is also not bad ...
          1. 0
            6 February 2017 10: 26
            Quote: commbatant
            Smolenskaya is also not bad ...

            Lyubinskaya good
    2. 0
      5 February 2017 14: 47
      Quote: Holoy
      Holuay February 3, 2017 14:29
      In general, Russia does not need the CSTO or the Customs Union under current conditions! The only thing you need is Belarusian dairy products ...


      justify ...
  12. +19
    3 February 2017 14: 30
    What are you trying to do? Why are you blocking Belarusian goods? We need to sell it to pay you for oil and gas, I always talk about this..
    ... Just like in an anecdote .. Customs officer to Coperfield, you say a magician ... you fly through the air .. Here I am now .. I'll show you the trick .. There was a carriage with equipment, it puts a stamp on a document, and now a carriage with peas ... and then there were Spanish oranges, but they were Belarusian ... the oysters were French, but they were Belarusian ... and Russia is also stalking ... Belarusian goods ... oysters from the Belarusian Sea, oranges from Belovezhskaya Pushcha ... Poroshenko's Lavra, Lukashenko is not given rest ...
  13. +16
    3 February 2017 14: 31
    The most interesting thing is that the majority of Belarusians sincerely believe that Rygorych is right and Russia lives at the expense of Belarus. I know this from my comrades, the Soviet officers who are now living in Belarus.
    1. +9
      3 February 2017 14: 38
      I would not say. Everyone has eyes. And even Russian TV channels with Internet resources have not yet been banned in Belarus.
      1. +8
        3 February 2017 15: 00
        The fact of the matter is that for now! On the outskirts, too, not at once the Natsiks came to power, there are "well-wishers"! hi
    2. +10
      3 February 2017 14: 45
      in hokhlyandiya, too, it began with this ...
      1. +2
        3 February 2017 14: 55
        Damir, straight to the point.
  14. +7
    3 February 2017 14: 31
    The old man's insanity began)
  15. +6
    3 February 2017 14: 37
    Parashenko, you see, sent his squirrel to him.
  16. +13
    3 February 2017 14: 40
    A request to Lukashenka -bury back the Belarusian sea-shrimp and other seafood, as well as goods from Europe, which are subject to our sanctions, are no longer brought to us. And planes -order yourself a hundred f35 at the expense of the USA and the EU, quite in ukroinski-you are all for us and money, and we blow your nose and shit in your face
  17. +13
    3 February 2017 14: 40
    The trouble. This is not the first time Lukashenka has tried to blackmail Russia. Although the stigma in the gun is strong.
    The chairman of the collective farm jumps over. His ambitions are much more powerful. And the supply of oil products to Ukraine from Russian oil? Which one did you get with a discount? How is that?
    In general, it is not very clear where and how the profits from such a profitable position of Belarus flow away. Why the standard of living in Belarus is lower than in Russia. The sensation is clear, I have been there more than once.
  18. +5
    3 February 2017 14: 45
    Soon this "bzdna" will be filled from their family offshore by the children of Butsky to fall asleep in order to buy a house in Rostov
  19. +8
    3 February 2017 14: 47
    Europe, so beloved by daddy, is close by! Come on sells his bulb there, and the demand for Belarusian shrimp is guaranteed. Alexander Grigorievich to trade to the West, to the West.
  20. 0
    3 February 2017 14: 47
    do not twitch son
  21. +2
    3 February 2017 14: 48
    He overestimates himself, 2019 will come on his knees begging
    1. 0
      4 February 2017 02: 09
      not catching up, but what in 2019? belay
  22. +5
    3 February 2017 14: 48
    Daddy Leksander Grygorych caught up with the euro-disease - brain softening !!!!!
  23. +2
    3 February 2017 14: 49
    experience and history show the correct result from all this - everything will be fine and Belarus was, is and will be with Russia. Now this is what is called "state interests" taking into account the geography and the prevailing political realities. Lukashenko, uncle is wise and pisses off these parameters, as well as the huge role of Belarus in transit and auto-railway communication with the EU ... in "a little" in his favor, in the Belarusian one. some kind of dankwart is a signal
  24. +3
    3 February 2017 14: 50
    In addition to the content of his statements, please pay attention to his speech turnover - 1000% selyuk.
  25. +1
    3 February 2017 14: 51
    That do not care, if only vodka does not rise in price (c) neighbor
    I don't understand anything about politics. I only feel the unhealthy media background. What is it for?
    1. +1
      3 February 2017 15: 39
      I'm not impressed with the products, but I liked the vodka.
  26. +6
    3 February 2017 14: 52
    And what will Lukasque testify if he is told: We do not need the Belarusian economy. We need Belarusian products. So drive them to us for free or at the prices set by us.
  27. +2
    3 February 2017 14: 52
    And then he suffered .... The phrase from the immortal work of Ilf and Petrov is always relevant.
  28. Bat
    +2
    3 February 2017 14: 53
    Potato dad seems to have moved with his mind, sawing the branch on which he sits.
    1. +9
      3 February 2017 15: 49
      Gray in the beard - Imp in the rib am Or senile denomination. Seemingly time to rest
  29. +12
    3 February 2017 14: 55
    "In 2014, the import of vegetables and fruits from the EU to Belarus increased several times. For example, in 2013, Belarusians bought cabbage 14,5 thousand tons, and in 2014 - already 40,1 thousand. Export of" Belarusian "cabbage to Russia , respectively, increased from 13,3 thousand tons to 48,6 thousand. Similar figures for apples, pears, apricots, peaches. "Polish stickers were found under the stickers of" Belarusian "apples. These are Belarusian goods, not to mention their seafood. A political prostitute named Lenin Trotsky, then there was no Lukashenko yet
  30. +4
    3 February 2017 14: 55
    So I already noticed that if a politician with a small mustache and a smoothed head, then this is such a vile and treacherous image ... Off the top: Hitler, Erdogan, Lukashenko ... Those friends ... ((( negative
  31. +11
    3 February 2017 14: 57
    In other words, Lukashenka, like all Soviet separatists, needs a freebie from Russia, and when Russia needs something, he will again begin to pester about his independence, rights to self-determination and independence.
  32. +7
    3 February 2017 14: 57
    Quote: Smoked
    The division of cash flows at the state level is a special thing.

    He thought that at the expense of free money from the Russian Federation he would cover his Western loans. And the freebie is not sickly - gas is cheaper than to Europe, oil is cheap, and even in such volumes that the fat on the resale is the same as Ukrainians cannot get from stealing gas. I wanted to twist the RF hands - they reduced the volume of supplies, and this at a time when the debt to the RF is growing and not being paid off, which can be considered another source of income, albeit a temporary one. The West, for its own money, will not turn this smart-ass collective farm chairman out of the way. Hence all this rhetoric about sovereignty and independence. An example of an independent neighbor is not a lesson for him - he will go to the West with his family, but what will become of the people who have supported him today, and tomorrow will be left with a bare bottom - this is where the danger of his pseudo-independence lies. You cannot live and not depend on anyone, even if you have everything beyond what you need for life! Lukashenka is a populist, but the average man wants to believe in his own peculiarity and believes him. soldier
    As for trade, nobody slows down Belarusian goods, but only if they are really Belarusian! good
  33. +5
    3 February 2017 15: 04
    Shenko virus passed from Poroshenko to Lukashenko
  34. +8
    3 February 2017 15: 08
    Another aggravation. End of winter, vitamin deficiency. Even Belovezhskaya oranges do not help. And if you look, how much Lukashenka has already poured mud on Russia, it’s time for him to cook a house not in Rostov, but in Magadan. Well, you have to be such a dog, bite the hand with which it eats. D.B.
  35. +2
    3 February 2017 15: 09
    The old man clearly does not understand that as soon as Lukashenko is gone, Belarus will become Russia.
    1. 0
      4 February 2017 08: 54
      Belarus will not become Russia after Lukashenko. Since Russia does nothing for this. And Western countries do a lot of things, with the permission and patronage of Lukashenka.
  36. 0
    3 February 2017 15: 17
    The authors of the post took some excerpts from the speech. At the expense of the military base. First, he talked about how unnecessary it is. Then he went over to criticize the opposition, who said that Russia is an enemy, will repeat the Crimean scenario, he also spoke about future joint exercises. This is a subtle allusion to the reason for the abandonment of the military base, so that the opposition and the public (and not only :)) do not excite. Do you think the people of the Republic of Belarus in the majority have a good attitude towards Russia, imagine their reaction if there was a real military base, so that his decision may even be beneficial. And at the expense of air defense, if you didn't know, the Detection Point in the Republic of Bashkortostan has recently started working, (I don’t know the details), but it seems to close most of it, in the Russian Federation they wanted to implement this for a long time.
    1. +2
      3 February 2017 15: 41
      Quote: Ivanbesmert
      Post Authors

      Leave this comment 5 more times. As I understand it, you’re an assistant to Lukashenka. Tell him from us
      1. +2
        3 February 2017 17: 51
        Yes, I don't really eat, I just wrote as I saw, lol. Well, I didn't want to send a comment just, I thought it was a bug, so I left it under the answer. And it apparently slowed down then it was displayed and it turned out 2 times, sorry :(
    2. +2
      3 February 2017 15: 53
      All that really follows from his rantings is that he believes that he is the only one cunning, and all the fools and he will sit with one fool on 2 chairs for another 20 years. No matter how negative
  37. +3
    3 February 2017 15: 24
    Quote: Just a man
    Maybe someone else will be found from Lukashenka's defenders and will explain to us, not distant, that this is our close ally and "brother"

    if you need a whipping boy - pzhl.
    Lukashenko, of course, is still a beetle. But he defends the interests of his country. What's wrong that he tries to take as much as possible and pay less?
    You might think we have a different policy. We put a fence on the goods of Belarusians, especially meat and dairy products. This is necessary for Russian large sellers of the same products. Here are just Russian they are rather arbitrary. Our / not our oligarchs want to restrict competition. it is clear that this causes a response from the neighbors.
    Belarusians sell oil to Ukraine ...
    And how does Armenia (a member of the CU and CSTO) feel about the fact that we sell weapons to Azerbaijan? This is so offhand. We are also looking at where to grab something. or rather, not us, but those who can do it.
    So everything is relative.
    Sorry for the confusion.
    1. +4
      3 February 2017 15: 55
      So why are they offended when we disagree with their demands? If everyone has their own interests ...
    2. +2
      3 February 2017 16: 15
      Junior Lieutenant Omich, you are right, daddy Lukash, he acted as a peasant should: pretending to be a simpleton, but in fact he was thinking about the benefit of the country and it was logical. Recently, daddy Lukash has lost his scent and looks into the geyrope
    3. +3
      3 February 2017 17: 37
      Quote: Omich
      And how does Armenia (member of the CU and CSTO) feel about the fact that we are selling weapons to Azerbaijan?

      Well, if we were to buy this very weapon with discount from Armenia and then sold to Azerbaijan, then, probably, it would look the same ...

      Quote: Omich
      You might think we have a different policy.

      The other one. Our talk is about mutually beneficial cooperation, and not Russia's altruism in favor of Belarus. One could talk about any discounts and concessions if the Allies "paid" at least politically, i.e. recognition of Crimea, support of counter-sanctions of the Russian Federation against the EU, recognition of Ossetia, deployment of a military base on its territory, etc. etc.
      And so .... Just the height of cunning ...
    4. +1
      4 February 2017 04: 54
      Omich, we are selling ours. Does Azerbaijan have any complaints that under the label "Made in Russia" the inscription "Made in China" is visible?
  38. +1
    3 February 2017 15: 29
    oh, okay, for the first time chtoli? :) , I think everything will be fine...
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 16: 03
      Quote: faiver
      oh, okay, for the first time chtoli? :) , I think everything will be fine...

      I also think so, Old Man likes to stick out ...
  39. +1
    3 February 2017 15: 41
    The old man looked at the consequences of the Russian base in Crimea and decided that he did not need it.
    1. +1
      3 February 2017 15: 55
      Actions in Crimea are a response to the occupation of Ukraine by the Nazi junta, if it weren't for the junta, Crimea would have remained with them.
      1. +1
        3 February 2017 15: 57
        You never know what Russia can consider a junta.
        1. +1
          3 February 2017 16: 12
          Those who kill their population for the sake of money and gave the country into occupation differently as a junta and enemies of the people cannot be named and if they do not release the GDP. Crimea there would also be bombed by peaceful people, so I did everything right.
          1. +2
            3 February 2017 16: 19
            Here's the definition:
            Junta (Spanish junta - assembly) - a group of military, [1] [2] came to power by force as a result of a coup, [3] [4] and, as a rule, exercising dictatorial rule by methods of terror [5]. In Spanish-speaking countries, associations and government agencies are called so. [4]

            There was nothing like that in Kiev, otherwise there would be no elections. As for "killing his population for the sake of money and giving the country to the occupation" is so controversial that I will not get involved.
            1. +3
              3 February 2017 16: 49
              What kind of elections are you talking about? From the choice that stood before the current president of Ukraine, to die or flee to Russia. Do not carry nonsense.
            2. 0
              4 February 2017 15: 42
              There was nothing like that in Kiev

              Yes, nothing like that, just everyone who disagrees with the junta was driven and destroyed, by order of the junta, this is an election.

              so controversial that I will not get involved.

              Well sooo controversial.
    2. +4
      3 February 2017 17: 41
      But we looked at Ukraine and came to the conclusion about the veracity of the proverb - No matter how much you feed the wolf, he keeps looking into the forest. Enough for Russia to feed the wolf, it's time to make a hat out of it!
    3. +1
      4 February 2017 08: 58
      And the Crimeans looked at the consequences of growing. bases in the Crimea and decided - nafig this Ukraine. This is what Lukashenka is afraid of.
      1. +1
        4 February 2017 15: 44
        Crimeans looked at the Nazi junta in Kiev, at the house of trade unions and fascist marches and
        decided - nafig this Ukraine
  40. +3
    3 February 2017 15: 50
    Dad is tired! from the usurper power, it's time for a well-deserved rest with gratitude from all Slavs !!!
  41. +1
    3 February 2017 15: 53
    What prevents them from living normally in prosperity? It seems like the goods are being sold, oil is discounted, loans were given to 0.0, maybe someone is stealing there very much?
  42. +1
    3 February 2017 16: 01
    Quote: Nikolai Bolotnikov
    Have you ever wondered why the United States finds a common language with everyone and under them half of the world, while Russia cannot establish contacts with anyone?

    probably because they have military bases in this "half of the world"
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. 0
    3 February 2017 16: 05
    Quote: Pushkar
    Quote: NEXUS

    Something tells me that in the near future my father will suddenly retire, as was the case with Khrushchev.
    Is there your own Brezhnev? Doubtful.

    Don't worry: "a holy place is never empty" - there will be those who want to steer
  45. +2
    3 February 2017 16: 05
    You just need to stop the borzet "dad", otherwise he might end up like Yanukovych, but he will not run away to Russia, but somewhere in a geyrope, it seems like we will remove the title of "the last dictator of geyrop" from him ... No.
    1. 0
      3 February 2017 17: 09
      It seems that the sanctions were only partially removed from him.
  46. The comment was deleted.
  47. +3
    3 February 2017 16: 14
    Moreover, most of the "napalm" from Alexander Lukashenko goes to the Russian Federation, which is a strategic partner of the Republic of Belarus

    Well, I don’t know who the partner is, but without Russia, the best foreman of the post-Soviet potato state farm would have been forgotten long ago.
  48. +7
    3 February 2017 16: 15
    Moment 1, economic. The Belarusians are in one way or another in the orbit of the Russian economy. We have sanctions and a drop in purchasing demand. We are being hummed about tightening our belts. The Belarusians, like us, cannot tighten their belts, since there is no such gigantic difference in the incomes of the population. In other words, they live there on average a little better than our lower level, without any special frills. "Procrastination" is fraught with mass poverty for them in the full sense of the word. Hence the whole dance.
    Moment 2, political. Lyaksandr Rygorovich is already in his years, and is probably thinking about a well-deserved rest for those honestly earned by back-breaking labor. Recent years have shown that the RF is not very suitable for a pleasant pastime in retirement. It is much more pleasant to take a break from pressing matters in Europe, or on tropical islands, slowly withdrawing money from an account in Switzerland. And here in Omerik, the elite changed, in Europe, too, everything became dull ... The most appropriate moment to flare up with democratic enlightenment.
    Moment 3, diplomatic. The foreign policy of the Russian Federation is dull, artless and superficial. Relationships are built exclusively on a personal basis, with leaders of states. As a result, we have Ukraine, Turkey, Syria, and now the Old Man. Even in the Soviet Union, they worked with the elites and business, public organizations.
  49. 0
    3 February 2017 16: 16
    Quote: Incvizitor
    What prevents them from living normally in prosperity? It seems like the goods are being sold, oil is discounted, loans were given to 0.0, maybe someone is stealing there very much?

    Where are there no thieves?
  50. +1
    3 February 2017 16: 21
    The leadership of Belarus is pursuing a dangerous policy and balancing on the brink of breaking off relations. We need to be careful, flexible and tough at the same time. Not yielding to their pressure and blackmail, to force Belarus not only to pay its debts, but also to stop anti-Russian rhetoric. Their help to the illegal Ukrainian regime in the war against the people of Donbass requires separate consideration. A systematic and very persistent search for a compromise is needed, which must be found. In general, Belarus must be dealt with very seriously, we cannot lose it as Ukraine, it is deadly. the Polish representative said so bluntly that NATO is interested in the eastern border of Belarus. And it's not just a matter of finding a compromise, along with the manifestation of a firm position, we must finally learn to work directly with the Russia-oriented part of the Belarusian society and even the opposition. You need to learn how to apply your soft power methods. At the same time, I would like to especially note that our country may well interest Belarus in interesting economic projects, but the supply of practically free oil and smuggling from and from their territory should be stopped. So: firmness, flexibility and the search for mutually beneficial options for interaction.
  51. +2
    3 February 2017 16: 28
    As far as I remember, all the fuss with oil products started because the Russian Federation and Belarus agreed so. We give them oil at a discount, they give us already distilled gasoline. That is, they loaded their refineries with work. At first they fulfilled the agreement and then began to send gasoline to Europe. There, a liter of gasoline costs 2 euros, but in the Russian Federation the same gasoline costs a penny. The fact that at gas stations in the Russian Federation is a separate issue. This is where the disagreements began. They sell oil for pennies, and they start throwing gasoline at solid euros. So a rift began in the form of “recommendations” from Bashneft and Tatneft to limit oil supplies to Belarus
  52. +6
    3 February 2017 16: 36
    Quote: Nikolai Bolotnikov
    Have you ever wondered why the United States finds a common language with everyone and under them half of the world, while Russia cannot establish contacts with anyone?


    It is impossible to find a common language with those who are trying to turn your Russian people in their countries into a separate nation with hatred of Russians.
    The United States would not for a day sponsor a regime in which the authorities are unfriendly to them. Russia, for 24 years, sponsored Ukraine in which the people were raised by the state to hate Russia and Russians, exalting Nazi collaborators and degenerates.
    In Belarus, the situation is different only in that there is no backlog in the form of Bandera’s supporters and the Russophobic generation needs to be raised, which the Belarusian authorities have been doing since independence in the 90s.
    The authorities of Ukraine and Belarus, from the moment they gained independence, are doomed to pursue a Russophobic policy internally in isolation from Russia, fearing that the triune Russian people might unite into one state, Russia, and they would turn out to be unnecessary.
    After the return of Crimea to Russia, Lukashenko became seriously frightened and sharply increased support for nationalist movements and support for the implementation of the Belarusian language.

    For me, the Belarusian and Ukrainian authorities are enemies of the Russian world, as they are against the reunification of the triune Russian people.
  53. 0
    3 February 2017 16: 57
    I will repeat the proposal voiced earlier - I will sell used tires to residents of Belarus, while they are not expensive...
  54. +1
    3 February 2017 17: 00
    It looks like “dad” is trying to sit on two chairs? In my opinion, a dangerous trend!
  55. +2
    3 February 2017 17: 00
    Quote: lopvlad
    For me, the Belarusian and Ukrainian authorities are enemies of the Russian world, as they are against the reunification of the triune Russian people

    so-called The “Russian world” was not divided. In Moscow, at least, there were always a lot of crests and Belarusians working. And not only.
    However, not everyone likes the customs of the Russian world, where the minimum wage is 7 thousand per month, and the salary of a government official is 5 million per day.
  56. +1
    3 February 2017 17: 23
    The old man generally went crazy and became insolent. The killer Poroshenko is his best friend. Russia gives him nothing! The Belarusian language is only 90 years old, even less than the Ukrainian language, and the fanaberia is longer than that of the Banderaites. Will Russia survive without Belarus? What about Belarus without Russia? Dad has gone completely crazy!
  57. +1
    3 February 2017 17: 28
    Quote: gladcu2
    Observer

    Yes, there’s no, he’s wearing an old man.

    Here's the GDP, messed up.

    This is in my superficial opinion, without going into details.

    What's the problem?

    The problem is as follows.

    There is a union agreement between the two countries. The agreement includes various areas of relationship. Economic, political, military.
    Russia is the basis of the contract, as it influences the formation of contractual volumes.
    It turns out that there is a contract, and the conditions are constantly changing from the wishes of the main partner. Simply because the partner is larger and prioritizes his interests.

    First, let's start with the main thing. The main thing is the economic system that dominates the settlement between market participants, the well-known and problematic capitalism. The basis of the system is competition. Competition for material resources. It is impossible to guarantee with absolute certainty that the parties to the transaction will find themselves in a bilateral advantageous position.

    Lukashenko felt that he could not cope with his economy, due to circumstances and changing conditions. Therefore, he began to signal his problems at the political level. At the level where he can have an opportunity, influence.

    Already in this article you can see what the problem is.

    Do you all remember how the GDP said that the world needs to increase the price of oil, so the price of oil is approaching the prime cost mark? Russia, like many other countries, trades in natural resources, oil. GDP, said that the OPEC countries should lower oil production in order to raise the price and Russia will support this organization. Russia has fulfilled its promise. The price went up. And she received a political warning from Lukashenka.

    There is a contract. This contract should not be influenced by the price of oil and its production. Crappy capitalism, not capitalism, and each of the partners is obliged to fulfill their part of the conditions. And don't give a damn about your problems.

    Output.

    The economic system does not provide guarantees for partnerships. This relationship cannot be left to chance. You need constant "manual control". In Russia, officials did not cope with the work due to the administrative decision of the president, GDP. A planned economy cannot react flexibly to the actions of its participants. The planned economy is a guarantee of partnership. A planned economy will always have contradictions with a market one.

    The view is superficial and therefore not correct.
    Russia, like no other country in modern times, complies with its obligations. At least the same oil supply. Supply contract in prices, volumes and terms. What are we not doing? New proposals from our side to reduce volumes, since these hooligan antics of the “brother” affect our interests, will be spelled out in new ones. Old people who are vomiting? Prices were set for almost a decade. Since then, oil prices have fallen. Have we corrected it? Certainly. Reduced in accordance with world standards? Yes. From whose side is the violence? At least not from the Russian one. Who, did Putin once say in Germany that he would strangle Russia with a pipe? Or, after all, Lukashenko? Opening visa-free entry into his territory is his business. But for us, this is our business. Otherwise, this could come to us through the “brothers.” that our lawyers will have to sweep the houses for a long time. So, let him take offense at himself, this chameleon in his pants. I could speak out more forcefully, but I’ll wait for now.
  58. 0
    3 February 2017 17: 32
    Well, the question is, who needs you besides Russia and who else will tolerate so many of your tricks besides the Russian Federation?
  59. 0
    3 February 2017 17: 53
    Amazing person!
    He himself digs a hole between nations and invites the children to fill it up!
    A strange man!
  60. 0
    3 February 2017 20: 37
    In general, we need to have an open dialogue. So that it is clear who is muddying the waters. Nishi or dad. Ours can wrap it up too. But the fact is that these post-Soviet leaders will change and those who studied at Harvard and others will get to these posts. And they will begin to squeeze us dry, blackmailing us with the admission of NATO troops or blocking transit or something else.
  61. 0
    3 February 2017 23: 40
    It's time Optimization - make one out of two states. It’s better to let those at the top think about this and there’s no point in fooling the people. They staged a clown show in the media.
  62. 0
    3 February 2017 23: 45
    As I understand it, Gazprom tried to deceive, but father was on the alert and exposed everything.
    1. +4
      4 February 2017 08: 59
      Yes, Lukashenko exposed, and now Gazprom owes him for gas, and not vice versa.
      1. 0
        4 February 2017 12: 20
        Gazprom seems to have become unprofitable.
        1. +1
          4 February 2017 12: 47
          And subsidized. Like Crimea. Therefore, Lukashenka needs to sell gas at 70, not 130.
  63. +1
    4 February 2017 06: 23
    **We fight no worse on military planes,** It’s time for Lukashenko to go to Kashchenko. The insanity grew stronger, **I remember everything that was not with me.** wassat
    1. 0
      4 February 2017 18: 42
      Why should Belarusians actually fly worse? Why are you humiliating them?
      Lukashenko didn’t even say what was better, but said “We are no worse.”
      1. 0
        5 February 2017 14: 54
        Quote: Rabinovich
        Why should Belarusians actually fly worse? Why are you humiliating them?
        Lukashenko didn’t even say what was better, but said “We are no worse.”


        Do you know how to read what he wrote or not?
        **We fight no worse on military planes,

        COMRADES, IT SEEMES TO ME THAT THERE ARE NOT JEWS, BUT BANDERISTS, SITTING ON THE FORUM UNDER THE FLAG OF ISRAEL, THE COMMENTS ARE PAINFULLY ONE-SIDED...
  64. 0
    4 February 2017 13: 40
    Quote: voyaka uh
    "The reform of your economy is stalling, but you need money. Your goods are uncompetitively capable of the world market." ////

    Stunned! One economic lagging behind with GDP growth in the red - Russia teaches another outsider - Belarus - how to live .... As if Russia is competitive on the world market.

    Have you already started to go crazy or are you already stunned? In fact, Russia is competitive on the world market and supplies a whole range of goods, including those of the highest competitive category.
    Have you already learned how to use Google?
  65. +1
    4 February 2017 16: 45
    What! He wants to destroy the commonwealth of our peoples. Takes the example of Poroshnyak.
  66. 0
    4 February 2017 18: 31
    It looks like the Russian Federation fucked with everyone it could. The only ones left are Iran (which has already defeated the Russian Federation on planes) and the DPRK.
    1. +1
      5 February 2017 14: 49
      Quote: legkostup
      legkostup Yesterday, 18:31
      It looks like the Russian Federation fucked with everyone it could. The only ones left are Iran (which has already defeated the Russian Federation on planes) and the DPRK.


      In your opinion, there is only one way out - to supply free raw materials to Jews, ask them who to be friends with and who not, and everything will be fine with us?
  67. 0
    4 February 2017 18: 33
    Well, what can we say here --- Friendship of convenience is not sincere friendship.
  68. 0
    5 February 2017 12: 13
    This is what happens when the chairman of a collective farm becomes the head of state. What kind of nonsense does Lukashenko spout. But only in Belarus there is neither an economy nor any kind of international politics. After all, the entire so-called economy of Belarus rests only on the Russian market and on Russian loans, both foreign currency and in the form of raw materials for processing. I have absolutely nothing against Belarusians, what difference does it make to be Russian. But Mr. Lukashenko crossed all the boundaries of what is permitted and what is not permitted. The chairman of the collective farm needs to know that you can’t spit against the wind, because everything will fly into your face. But in the event of a cataclysm, he has nowhere to run. So it will be like Yanukovych begging for forgiveness and help. And the question arises: will it be necessary to save the...ts?
  69. 0
    6 February 2017 21: 06
    WE NEED TO BE A MEMBER OF RUSSIA!
    1. 0
      7 February 2017 16: 39
      But Russia is against it. How Ukraine is trying to get into Europe and NATO, but likewise they are not taking it. Zugzwang.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  70. 0
    7 February 2017 21: 22
    Quote: Roma-1977
    But Russia is against it. How Ukraine is trying to get into Europe and NATO, but likewise they are not taking it. Zugzwang.

    Russia is not against Belarus joining Russia. Lukashenko is against it. Because in Belarus, Lukashenko the Tsar does what he wants. But in Russia, you need to obey Putin or another Russian president. Or Lukashenko will be removed from business altogether.
    Russia is not against it, but Lukashenko is against it and Lukashenko doesn’t want to. Because he doesn’t want to lose his power over Belarus.
    And Lukashenko has already fed up his people with his anti-people laws: a tax on the unemployed, raising the retirement age, power to bureaucrats and bosses and large salaries for them and the people.
    1. 0
      8 February 2017 14: 51
      The annexation of Belarus will cost Russia a lot of money (Crimean costs multiplied by five), and now is not the time. In addition, in Belarus, less than 50% of the population supports the idea of ​​unconditional entry into Russia, and after exposure to increased “soft” anti-Russian propaganda, which even the official media have now taken up, this will decrease even more. The last thing Russia needs is clearing out these hemorrhoids.
      1. 0
        11 February 2017 01: 15
        Lies and provocation. Everything will quickly integrate into Russia.
  71. 0
    11 February 2017 01: 03
    Quote: Roma-1977
    The annexation of Belarus will cost Russia a lot of money (Crimean costs multiplied by five), and now is not the time. In addition, in Belarus, less than 50% of the population supports the idea of ​​unconditional entry into Russia, and after exposure to increased “soft” anti-Russian propaganda, which even the official media have now taken up, this will decrease even more. The last thing Russia needs is clearing out these hemorrhoids.

    Well, is it better to let there be foreign military bases in Belarus, hostile to Orthodox Russia, to the Russian Orthodox? And let there be a missile defense system in Belarus against Russia and the vice will continue to tighten? And they will turn Belarusians into Russophobes - is this the best solution in your opinion?
    ALL Belarus, ALL Belarusians, ALL citizens of Belarus support Belarus’s entry into Russia. Otherwise, Belarus is just crap.
  72. The comment was deleted.
  73. 0
    11 February 2017 01: 17
    Quote: Roma-1977
    Belarus will not become Russia after Lukashenko. Since Russia does nothing for this. And Western countries do a lot of things, with the permission and patronage of Lukashenka.

    It depends on who comes. And what if Russia does just that and comes after Lukashenka, a normal pro-Russian one, who will hold a referendum in Belarus on Belarus joining Russia? Although I agree with you here, there’s not much, not much that Russia, the Russians are doing. They’re sick of it. Ukraine hasn’t taught them? But the West and the USA are doing a lot.
    Brothers, Russians, you need to get moving, work more actively with Belarus, with the Belarusians. Don’t you have an analytical center or something?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"