"With the lifting of sanctions, the" Russian bear "will become a monster"

59
In the United States are afraid that the lifting of sanctions will lead to a sharp increase in the Armed Forces of Russia, writes Defense One.



“A number of military experts in the United States have concerns that the possible lifting of anti-Russian sanctions by Donald Trump will allow the Russian defense industry to gain access to some of the most important technologies, which will significantly enhance Russia's military potential,” the article quotes RIA News.

The publication notes that the Russian armed forces are considered second only to the US, emphasizing "the perfection of Russian air defense systems, armored vehicles, as well as fifth-generation fighter aircraft under development."

In addition, the Russian army is growing quantitatively. So in 2014, the First Guards was recreated tank army stationed in the west of the country.
This army affects the situation in Europe by the very fact of its existence: it forces the units sent for reinforcement to the Baltic states to shudder, and Eastern European countries are scared to death,
quotes the publication of the head of the Independent Potomac Institute for Political Studies, Pentagon consultant Philip Carber.

According to the author of the article, "access to technology from the list of US military products will increase the already significant Russian military power, turning the" Russian bear "into a real monster." However, he notes that although the existing sanctions do not constitute an insurmountable obstacle to the development of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, they nevertheless "seriously complicate the obtaining of military-important technologies."

But if all restrictions are removed from Moscow, this task will be greatly simplified, the publication concludes.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    2 February 2017 08: 36
    Who is the USA today? - This is a super monster and a parasite.
    1. 0
      2 February 2017 08: 45
      Well, so they are afraid that we will be able to replace them ... then no one needs the dollar and will cost less than the paper on which it is printed ...
      1. +11
        2 February 2017 09: 07
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Well, they are afraid that we will be able to replace them ...


        Unfortunately it will be difficult. The economy is at war. Influence expands the economy. Weapons only reinforce the existing economic power, and expanding it with weapons is inefficient. Capturing something else does not mean getting something from it. To master the occupied territory is much more difficult and more expensive than just to occupy. Therefore, the army in the modern world is secondary to economic influence. Without economic power, a military will always be like a cart in front of a horse. The US is more concerned about China, as its military power is combined with economic power. And the troops in Europe are only to calm the allies.
        1. 0
          2 February 2017 09: 14
          China is in the ring of enemies. China has no territorial disputes with only one country - Russia. So if something happens, Vietnam, India, Japan, Taiwan will gladly stick a knife in China’s back.
          1. +6
            2 February 2017 09: 24
            Quote: Moskovit
            China has no territorial disputes with only one country - Russia.

            This is what you think, having "occupied" the original "Chinese Siberia" where more Chinese than Russians already live wink
            1. 0
              2 February 2017 09: 40
              Everyone knows more. "We are trying more ..."
              And it is right. Everything flows and dries. You cannot soak your feet in a dry river. Especially on the BBV.
            2. +3
              2 February 2017 11: 37
              Quote: He1ovek
              This is what you think, having "occupied" the original "Chinese Siberia" where more Chinese than Russians already live

              Since when has Siberia become an original Chinese land? I will tell you more, part of the land of China is the original Russian lands, if you recall the Great Tartaria.
            3. +3
              2 February 2017 11: 41
              Well, why write nonsense about millions of Chinese in Siberia?)
              1. +2
                2 February 2017 12: 12
                Well, a person probably from his country it is better seen what is happening in our Siberia.
                1. +2
                  2 February 2017 19: 15
                  Quote: KondratKo
                  Well, a person probably from his country can better see what is happening in our Siberia


                  Duc, Jewish Autonomous Region - it is on the very border with China! And there are probably more Chinese there than Jews! So he is worried! laughing
            4. +3
              2 February 2017 12: 41
              Laurels of Azef, Gershuni and other comrades do not give rest? What are theories about the Chinese? I understand that you would certainly like this very much. But they are here in Siberia, not quite comfortable! Everyone left for themselves, they have New Year now, they will celebrate another week! And yes, it is customary to celebrate it with their family, in their native land! Born, and I live in the region you designated, I know what I'm talking about hi Shalom to you, from Asgard of Iria! Yes And yes, I completely forgot, there are more of ours in China now than we are Chinese! laughing And as for the "occupation" of territories laughing funny you!
            5. 0
              2 February 2017 18: 56
              Dear, have you counted the Chinese in Siberia? Not tired by the hour? This nonsense about "where more Chinese than Russians already live" is mainly carried by our Jewish friends. Not tired yet hi
            6. 0
              2 February 2017 19: 43
              Siberia has never been Chinese, and the people living there, although Asians, have nothing to do with the Han, and the Uyghur region has the most problematic region.
          2. 0
            2 February 2017 11: 44
            Taiwan is the rebellious province of the PRC, which, in turn, considers the territory of the PRC occupied by "communist rebels."
            Vietnam, with all the disputes and disagreements, considers China to be an ideological ally and almost an "elder brother." The official position of the SRV is this - territorial disputes with the PRC are a sad misunderstanding. The PRC has the same position regarding disputes with the SRV.))
            The DPRK has no territorial claims against the PRC. Both Bhutan and Burma do not have them.))
        2. +2
          2 February 2017 10: 51
          Quote: Orel
          Therefore, the army in the modern world is secondary to economic influence. Without economic power, a military will always be like a cart in front of a horse. The US is more concerned about China, as its military power is combined with economic power. And the troops in Europe are only to calm the allies.

          This is partly true, but no one excludes such an “insignificant” property of the army as to dust someone’s developed economy and thereby raise their own, by seizing equipment and technologies, as well as honestly redistributing other assets and gold and foreign exchange reserves the winner’s favor))). By the way, Russia never plundered the defeated enemy to the last line and allowed the defeated side to rebuild its well-being. Even Germany did not receive full compensation for the damage caused to the USSR. But parasites and our generosity do not appreciate ..... You must admit that the European economy in 1941 was more developed than the economy of the USSR, and the Wehrmacht army, in terms of technology, was an order of magnitude higher than the Red Army. However, we won. I'm not talking about the economy of the United States and Vietnam ..........
          1. 0
            2 February 2017 11: 22
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Agree that the economy of Europe in 1941 was more developed than the economy of the USSR


            You make a mistake when you evaluate the "Europe" of 1941 as a whole and contrast the USSR. There was none. Each country in Europe had its own economy; it was not united. In terms of industrial production, the USSR really lost in many things, but this was due to the collapse of the country, the civil war and restrictions on international cooperation, which prevented the penetration of new technologies into the USSR. However, the USSR did not completely curtail international cooperation. Many large industrial enterprises of the country were actually built by foreigners. The Stalingrad Tractor Plant was mounted by an American contractor. The plant was manufactured in the USA, assembled, then dismantled and transported to the USSR by ships and mounted in a new place. Therefore, the industry of the USSR in the prewar years was created in many respects with the involvement of Western experts, despite the politics. And economically, the USSR was gaining strength, but the administrative model of the economy itself and the war certainly crippled us. Lend-lease helped a lot in this regard. Opponents of its significance say that the overall percentage of deliveries was small compared to general production in the USSR. But they are cunning, since Lend-Lease supplied a lot of critically important raw materials and goods without which the production of many items of military products was simply impossible physically. For example, the mobility of the army and the rear was almost completely ensured by foreign trucks.
            1. +1
              2 February 2017 13: 02
              Quote: Orel
              Lend-lease helped a lot in this regard. Opponents of its significance say that the overall percentage of deliveries was small compared to general production in the USSR. But they are cunning, since Lend-Lease supplied a lot of critically important raw materials and goods without which the production of many items of military products was simply impossible physically. For example, the mobility of the army and the rear was almost completely ensured by foreign trucks.

              You climb into the wilds. Definitely - in 1941, evaluating the economy in conjunction with the army, the USSR was weaker than Germany. As for the Lend Lease, he went only when it became clear that Germany would not win this war. And yet, yes, Western support in the provision of goods and materials and Lend-Lease Armaments was not free of charge, not as a goodwill gesture, but for voiced yellow metal that the USSR shipped in exchange for supplies. I also remember that after the war we returned to our “partners” the surviving equipment delivered according to Lend-Lease, including the trucks you mentioned, which they immediately turned into scrap metal and sent for re-melting. Everything is conditional and not so simple, but of our "partnership" relations.
              1. 0
                3 February 2017 06: 34
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                You climb into the wilds. Definitely - in 1941, evaluating the economy in conjunction with the army, the USSR was weaker than Germany.


                It is difficult to say here, in terms of military production the USSR was significantly ahead. Even if you look at the performance indicators of the main military products. We have always surpassed Germany in the production of tanks and self-propelled guns, we just lost them very quickly, but this is a different story. Before the war, in general, we had 13 tanks in the border districts, and there were about 000 new models that exceeded all that the Wehrmacht had, but we could not apply them correctly, and the organizational structure of the Mehkorpus arr. 2000 was extremely unsuccessful, cumbersome, uncontrollable in a real battle, which largely predetermined the rout.
          2. 0
            2 February 2017 11: 46
            In the GDR, our generosity was appreciated. After all, we satisfied all our claims at the expense of our zone of occupation.
    2. +2
      2 February 2017 08: 48
      cniza And the USA
      who today? - This is a super monster and a parasite.
      Helminth (worm) Healthy striped worm
      1. +3
        2 February 2017 09: 20
        Sanctions, sanctions, sanctions ... everyone has already forgotten their essence, but dancing with tambourines around this bugbear continues.
        With or without sanctions, the West will not transfer us.
        Anti-sanctions can only be our SVR.
    3. +8
      2 February 2017 09: 29
      Sanctions were imposed in order to worsen the life of the Russian people, and not the business of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. laughing Judging by the rising prices for food, medicine, a communal apartment and an increase in taxes on the "bad habits" of almost half of the citizens, the government is experiencing our patience, but the oligarchs are only gaining fat from this. belay
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      3 February 2017 18: 58
      Quote: cniza
      Who is the USA today? - This is a super monster and a parasite.

      The USA is only the tip of the iceberg, or rather, the Masonic hydra.
  2. +3
    2 February 2017 08: 39
    This army affects the situation in Europe by the very fact of its existence: it forces the units sent for reinforcement to the Baltic states to shudder, and Eastern European countries are scared to death,

    Do not shudder strongly there, otherwise the kakahi from the legs will begin to fall out.
    access to technology from the list of US military products

    Well, nafig - the longer there is no American junk, the sooner his will appear.
    1. +2
      2 February 2017 08: 57
      Here, as usual, they roll a green goat with their fingers and dance around it. Why are you so fearful, if you are so great and terrible?
  3. +8
    2 February 2017 08: 42
    According to the author of the article, "access to technology from the list of US military products will increase the already significant Russian military power, turning the" Russian bear "into a real monster." However, he notes that although the existing sanctions do not constitute an insurmountable obstacle to the development of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, they nevertheless "seriously complicate the obtaining of military-important technologies."
    But if all restrictions are removed from Moscow, this task will be greatly simplified, the publication concludes.


    You might think that before the sanctions we had free access to US military technology! Here they had it. They should put a monument to humpback and alcoholic for technology, including ...
  4. +5
    2 February 2017 08: 43
    will allow the Russian defense industry to gain access to some of the most important technologies, which will significantly strengthen Russia's military potential

    Here it is the goal of sanctions and, of course, an attempt to undermine our economy. And then Crimea, Crimea, Ukraine. There would be a desire, but an occasion can always be found.
    1. +2
      2 February 2017 08: 52
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Here it is the goal of sanctions and, of course, an attempt to undermine our economy.

      We spawn from their military uniforms and so did not see anything. This is an empty concussion.
      1. +1
        2 February 2017 14: 11
        Our specialty uses quite a lot of their military. Sights, helmet, NVD, thermal imagers, body armor, active headphones, almost 100% of equipment, because we don’t do this, or disgusting quality, even shoes, although this is a drop in the bucket. Well, the fact that without importing high-tech equipment (with which we have just tight) is somewhat difficult for aviation, navy and armored vehicles (again, optics, thermal imagers, night vision devices, radars).
  5. +9
    2 February 2017 08: 44
    For that matter, then sanctions against Russia, (SVR, GRU laughing) Well, it doesn’t affect both the improvement of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the strengthening of the defense capability of RUSSIA ... Rather, the opposite.
    1. +5
      2 February 2017 08: 52
      For that, the increase in prices for something is reflected on us. There was a couple of days ago, they want to increase communal tariffs in Novosibirsk because of saving citizens.
      A strong army is great and right, but a strong rear is not iron.
      1. +6
        2 February 2017 09: 02
        Well, not only in Novosibirsk they get to insanity ...

        Vodokanal in the Jewish Autonomous Region has included rain and snow collection in its accounts, EAOmedia reports.

        A new item of expenses for the city’s institutions was discussed at an extraordinary meeting of the commission on territorial public self-government and city economy of the Duma of Birobidzhan. Director of Municipal Unitary Enterprise Vodokanal Andrey Pivenko addressed the local authorities.

        “Today, the enterprise [in connection with precipitation] pumps over 3 million tons of unaccounted water, which causes enormous costs. We have to take into account these losses in water disposal,” he said.
        - so that the "excesses" on the ground must, and are no longer required to be dealt with by the prosecutor's office, but by the FSB.
        1. +1
          2 February 2017 09: 44
          "To date, the enterprise [in connection with precipitation] pumps over 3 million tons of unaccounted water,
          it is a purely question - a city. local taxes and distribution (and dough is always small) in the opposite direction. during the precipitation season
        2. cap
          +2
          2 February 2017 09: 59
          Quote: Knowing
          Director of Municipal Unitary Enterprise Vodokanal Andrey Pivenko addressed the local authorities.
          “Today, the enterprise [in connection with precipitation] pumps over 3 million tons of unaccounted water, which incurs enormous costs. We have to take into account these wastewater losses,” he said. the prosecutor’s office, and the FSB, are obliged to deal with it.


          It turns out in a dry year, Vodokanal will return the money. You won’t need to transfer anything. Then Mr. Pivenko will have to get his stash laughing
        3. 0
          2 February 2017 11: 50
          Read the information on this subject on the Internet. On Ukrainian sites, with pleasure at first this news began to be sucked. And then even stubborn patriots came to the conclusion that everything is logical, and the same fees in Ukrainian cities have long existed.))
          In fact, there are similar payments in most Russian (and not Russian) cities. Stormwater for something needs to be maintained.))
        4. 0
          2 February 2017 19: 46
          Quote: Knowing
          Vodokanal in the Jewish Autonomous Region

          I recall numerous jokes.
  6. +2
    2 February 2017 08: 49
    Guys arrived from the 70-80 years and probably write their articles.
    Very funny ones.
  7. +9
    2 February 2017 09: 11
    Only the US mind, honor and conscience of our era.
  8. +5
    2 February 2017 09: 17
    So the Russian Armed Forces are not weakly strengthened. What "critical" technologies can affect the combat effectiveness of our army? They won’t sell us their M-4 super-screw? laughing Or will nuclear technology be hidden? Or maybe they will not invite the budget to cut on the next version of laser weapons? Our military-industrial complex confidently creates illusions about the advantages of American technology over Russian. Finally, the privacy mode is on. And then everything is out ...
    So far, no advantage (decisive) in wunderwaffles with star-striped markings is noticeable.
    1. +3
      2 February 2017 09: 26
      The Russian army has problems of a technical nature - guided ammunition, optical heads - thermal, radio communications, electronic base.
      1. +1
        2 February 2017 09: 48
        the question is the cost and transfer to the civilian sector of technology from the defense industry. This is the price of food and electricity. and machine tools. and cars (all). and advanced knowledge (for all, including and for the West, from us, but first of all, vocational schools do not receive)
  9. +1
    2 February 2017 09: 19
    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    Well, they are afraid that we will be able to replace them ... then no one will need the dollar and will cost less than the paper on which it is printed ...

    2% of the population; 1,7% of global GDP; in 7 dozen countries by GDP per person; growth rates for 15 years are 20% lower than the world average, for 5 years - 2 times lower; average salary - in the 5th dozen countries; citation index - in the region of Egypt; the best university - beyond a hundred; military budget - on par with Saudi Arabia; the share of its currency in world turnover - 0,2%; share in world trade - 1%.

    be sure to replace it someday (((((((
    1. 0
      2 February 2017 19: 48
      Quote: Vitwin
      be sure to replace it someday

      And the unemployment rate in the US will not lead?
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. +6
      2 February 2017 10: 30
      You all correctly say, definitely +
      Only who said that in general there is a confrontation?
      The West is singing diferembes to the government’s economic course to stifle its own economy.
      Naibulin, Kudrin recognized as the "greatest economists" of our time, and
      Quote: Inhuman
      It is profitable for them to sell oil and our other resources, lease land, raise taxes and tariffs and other delights of Putin's stability.
      This policy has been going on for 25 years, with or without sanctions.
    2. 0
      2 February 2017 19: 49
      Quote: Inhuman
      The government does not benefit from the course of confrontation between Russia and the West, they are forced to take it.

      So why are there something?
  11. cap
    +1
    2 February 2017 09: 52
    According to the author of the article, "access to technology from the list of US military products will increase the already significant Russian military power, turning the" Russian bear "into a real monster." However, he notes that although the existing sanctions do not constitute an insurmountable obstacle to the development of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, they nevertheless "seriously complicate the obtaining of military-important technologies."


    I don’t understand one thing that we haven’t "stole" it yet. laughing Such naive.
    1. +1
      2 February 2017 18: 37
      Quote: cap
      I don’t understand one thing that we haven’t "stole" it yet. laughing naive such.


      This is not Fedya’s robot on the wire.

      1. cap
        0
        2 February 2017 18: 46
        Thanks for the link. An interesting device, how many interesting hours will work at this pace. After all, there is still no military load on him, if we say that it will not be just a scout, and cross-country ability is a big question. Although yes, it is impressive.
        Or maybe they stole it all the same laughing Only keep quiet out of modesty winked
  12. +4
    2 February 2017 10: 14
    However, it has already been repeatedly said that "the dear ruble is not profitable for us"
    1. +4
      2 February 2017 10: 27
      You tell this to those who volunteered to go to the front during the Second World War. Probably the most patriotic, based on this promise, we have millionaires.
      1. +1
        2 February 2017 11: 27
        Do not confuse completely different situations! Rejoice at gas flows, gum convoys and “world respect”, having a collapsed currency of 100% (in other oil-producing countries, the national currency fell by 13% max) gas is more expensive than in Belarus and so on!
        1. +4
          2 February 2017 11: 42
          I had already heard this. Like, we won’t fight for Abramovich’s yachts and Vekselberg’s diamonds. It only says that these people are not going to fight for anyone and for nothing. And they will always find a beautiful excuse for themselves. You know, it smells ..
          And the patriot protects first of all his country, people, home, family, and then everything else.
    2. +1
      2 February 2017 14: 09
      Schizophrenia - do not go to the polls, and then scold the authorities from the sofas, who came up with your tacit connivance.
  13. 0
    2 February 2017 11: 27
    "This army influences the situation in Europe by the very fact of its existence: it makes the units sent for reinforcements to the Baltic states shudder, and it scares Eastern European countries to death"

    I wish this were true. Only here, for example, residents of the Baltic states are more afraid of the presence of American tanks in their countries than Russian tanks, albeit at the western borders, but standing on their territory.
  14. 0
    2 February 2017 14: 07
    Only when we will be a "monster" - will there be peace on Earth!
  15. 0
    2 February 2017 15: 17
    Are they seriously afraid, afraid? Or is the defense industry paying them for this?
    Judging by all the sources gone, heard, read, so at tea, spent time ... high-ranking "alarmists" and "experts" money row such that Serdyukov is as equal to them as a gopnik compared to a thief in law .. Well, Mr. McCain, as one of the oldest in terms of bullying, knocking out and distributing, has so much kickback ... In general,. If he pretends to be a nuclear war, then he will need paper candy wrappers, empty plastic cards and even gold ... In that world, clean food and non-radioactive drink will be appreciated. AND! Also a great personal weapon ...
  16. 0
    2 February 2017 15: 52
    it shudders units sent for reinforcements to the Baltic states, and scares Eastern European countries to death,

    And if this army is a militant step, but on the parade ground ... then these units will die to death?
  17. +1
    2 February 2017 16: 19
    Just some kind of nonsense: "A number of military experts in the United States have concerns that the possible lifting of anti-Russian sanctions by Donald Trump will allow the Russian defense industry to gain access to some important technologies, which will significantly strengthen Russia's military potential."
    Fears, concerns, sanctions have nothing to do with it, access to technology can always be obtained, and not only legally. wink
  18. 0
    3 February 2017 06: 47
    In the United States are afraid that the lifting of sanctions will lead to a sharp increase in the Armed Forces of Russia, writes Defense One.

    It was necessary to be afraid in 2014, when all this bodyagie from the American pitch started.
    And now, upon the sharp increase in Russia militarily, there are two options.
    Or by your opinion after the lifting of sanctions, the Russian armed forces will increase dramatically, or after tougher sanctions on the fact of 14-16 years, the Russian armed forces will increase even more.
    The result is the same - so relax and have fun.