Failures of "Roscosmos" in the assessment of NASA

11
Failures of "Roscosmos" in the assessment of NASAAccording to the Americans, the reasons for the failures that have been pursuing Roscosmos throughout the year are not systemic. A NASA spokesman said he believes in his Russian colleagues. At the same time, he also noted that manned rockets are being prepared for flights regardless of the missiles that launch satellites into orbit.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) does not see in the known difficulties with Soyuz, as well as in the Progress accident in 2011, of serious systemic problems. According to the agency "News”, Referring to the head of the International Space Station program at NASA, M. Saffredini, the US space agency believes that Russian colleagues are concerned about the issues that have arisen. Saffredini said that Russian colleagues had difficult launches over the past year, but they take their work seriously. Saffredini also noted that the difficulties that had arisen were not related to the manufacturer of Soyuz and Progress - RSC Energia.

According to the representative of NASA, Roscosmos employees are very concerned about what is not a "systemic problem." “I know that they take the problems seriously, and, in general, I am sure of them,” said M. Saffredini.

Giving a comment on the latest failure of Roscosmos - a breakdown during testing of the descent vehicle of the Soyuz TMA-04M manned spacecraft, a NASA representative called the problem situation very unsuccessful, but at the same time considered it an "internal affair of Russian partners." Saffredini explained that testing is a complex process and that this can happen. The representative of NASA does not see in the incident a more serious problem related to RSC Energia.

However, against the background of a number of accidents at the Phobos-Grunt interplanetary station and several Russian satellites, a NASA representative noted that it is customary to treat the spacecraft of the manned program completely differently from the point of view of safety and quality control.

The past 2011 year has passed for Roscosmos indeed very hard. In December, 2010 was a major setback for Russian space specialists during the orbital launch of several GLONASS satellites. In February, 2011 was lost another military satellite. Then, in August, Roskosmos was unable to put the Express-AM-4 telecommunications satellite into orbit, which had a cost of over seven billion rubles. In August, for the first time in thirty years, the Progress-M-12М, which delivered the cargo for the space station, fell to the ground during its launch into space. Further, in November 2011, the Roscosmos lost the Phobos-Grunt interplanetary station. Finally, in December, 2011 suffered a catastrophe at the launch and the military satellite Meridian.

The new, 2012 year, for Roskosmos, also began with major troubles: on the tests before the flights the landing vehicle of the Soyuz manned spacecraft was damaged. Recall that today only "Soyuz" can deliver astronauts to the International Space Station. The NASA office very much hopes that all the failures listed will not affect the work of the station.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    4 February 2012 11: 49
    Let us hope that the authorities will learn from those problems that have occurred.
    1. 0
      14 November 2018 01: 52
      What does power have to do with it? Or do you have another reason?
  2. Slayer
    -3
    4 February 2012 11: 52
    American, they themselves can no longer fly into space, and they interfere with us ...
    1. jamert
      +13
      4 February 2012 11: 54
      Have you read the article, dear? or hatred of "Pindos" you completely closed your eyes?
    2. -2
      4 February 2012 13: 29
      I would not say that they interfere. Manned space exploration in Russia occupies a niche of 40% of the total launch of spacecraft. And this is the first indicator in the world ...
  3. Vrangel
    -4
    4 February 2012 11: 56
    "By yourself with a mustache", we will do without the "expert" assessment of NASA.
  4. ab
    ab
    -1
    4 February 2012 12: 03
    Giving a comment on the latest failure of Roscosmos - a breakdown during tests of the descent vehicle of the Soyuz TMA-04M manned spacecraft, a NASA representative called the problem situation very unsuccessful, but considered it to be "an internal affair of the Russian partners." Saffredini explained that testing is a complex process and that this can happen. NASA representative does not see in the incident a more serious problem related to RSC Energia
    ».
    In general, NASA can understand, criticize Russia and beat the plates, so to speak, step on its tail. Before NASA moves to a new manned system, they are completely dependent on the Russian Space Agency, and as you know, they don’t change horses

    Quote: Vrangel
    Yourself with a mustache ", we will do without the" expert "assessment of NASA.

    That's for sure, especially in the light of our recent successes.
    1. Vrangel
      -5
      4 February 2012 12: 48
      It's like "you" have the last good luck?
  5. +4
    4 February 2012 12: 18
    God forbid, everything will work out. I would like to have such relations with the Americans ... so to speak "without foam at the mouth" ... The world would definitely become HEALTHY.
    1. -1
      5 February 2012 09: 27
      This will never happen ...
  6. sashalenovo
    +3
    4 February 2012 12: 23

    http://www.buran.ru/htm/cliper.htm
    Representatives of RSC Energia announced that work on the project for the new Russian reusable manned spacecraft Clipper has been completed. Currently, the program is under implementation, and the commissioning of Clipper is scheduled for implementation by 2015.
    http://student.km.ru/view.asp?id=185A9ADD031E45638D109D8375744D9A&idrubr=711CAD9
    370434AD385D11AF2A4CBE76E
  7. +9
    4 February 2012 12: 23
    Internal problems have long matured in Roscosmos. Successful managers always bring any problem to the handle. And there there are too many of them. It's time to solve staffing problems. Everyone should do what he knows and can. In our case, all failures are transferred to a switchman - some locksmith who missed, forgot, cut, squandered, etc. It got to the point that the Americans are beginning to teach us, are optimistic, at least in words, about our capabilities. But this does not make it easier for us. There are too many unsuccessful launches. But so far, unfortunately, no one has been punished. All work hard at their posts.
  8. Nechai
    +2
    4 February 2012 13: 00
    "In the opinion of the Americans, the reasons for the failures that have plagued Roscosmos throughout the year are not systemic." - well, not only THIS YEAR. And precisely the reasons are systemic. Having collapsed the one that existed before, not sinless, but working. They blinded something different, based on different values ​​and priorities. Please, get it ...
  9. suharev-52
    +1
    4 February 2012 19: 53
    AlexUkr. I agree with you. All the failures of our "Roscosmos" in recent years are connected precisely with the fact that the industry is run by "specialists" of a different profile. These successful managers can only effectively - steal, sawed, benefit for themselves. In case of failure, they blame the failure: on alien intervention, cosmic cataclysms, the intrigues of enemies, or, in extreme cases, find a switchman among the locksmiths, but not the fault of their loved ones. When these gentlemen manage the industry, it gradually degrades. But that doesn't bother them in the least. The main thing is that the grandmas are mastered in full.
  10. -1
    5 February 2012 06: 53
    Lavrov’s page is already 7 hours old, as I observe, remains infected with the virus.

    Infection details
    URL: http://xn----8sbqhgcbyc6bn6h.xn--p1ai/uploads/posts/2010-04/1272495522_1histori5
    22.jpeg
    Process: file://C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\Aplication\chrome.exe
    Infection: al