Military Review

Gorbachev: nuclear war must be banned at the UN

90
Today, the situation on the planet looks as if the world is preparing for a global war, writes former USSR President Mikhail Gorbachev.



“Relations between the great powers for several years increasingly deteriorate. Advocates of arms build-up and the military-industrial complex are rubbing their hands together, ”Gorbachev quoted the agency. Ридус.

The politician calls to put war outside the law. And the first step along this path must be taken by the member states of the UN Security Council. In particular, he proposes to adopt a resolution at the Security Council meeting, which would state that "nuclear war is unacceptable and cannot be waged under any circumstances." The initiative in this matter, according to Gorbachev, should come from Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

Today, the burden of fear and the stress it causes are felt by millions of people, and the main reason is militarism, armed conflict, the arms race and the nuclear sword of Damocles. To rid the world of this fear is to make people freer. This goal should be universal. Then it will be easier to solve many other problems. The time has come to make decisions and act
he writes.

Commentary by Leonid Gusev, Senior Researcher, Analytical Center, MGIMO Institute of International Studies: “I do not think that we need to prepare for war, especially for a nuclear one. The fact that some countries with similar weapons, from time to time it is reminded of in different ways, does not at all indicate an intention to use it and attack someone. ”

Another expert - political analyst Stanislav Byshok - also believes that "nuclear potential, especially in the last decade, is generally more a deterrent than an attack." And "countries like Iran or North Korea are interested in obtaining it solely for the purpose of self-defense in order to protect themselves from a possible attack, because they are in an extremely difficult environment," he said.

“As for the direct accumulation of nuclear weapons or the rearmament of the US Army, about which Trump spoke, and also praised Putin for the fact that he re-armed the Russian army for many years, there is nothing terrible here. I repeat, nuclear weapons are used, and will be used as a sign of a superpower, on the one hand, and for defensive purposes, on the other. Because we are well aware that there will be no winners in a nuclear war ", - said Byshok.

Gorbachev's initiative to ban a nuclear war at the UN level seems to him somewhat frivolous, from the series “for all the good, against all the bad”.

“There is no rational component in this proposal, the political analyst explains. And why only nuclear? Let us also ban the war in principle, let's ban people to kill each other, states to attack each other, ”the expert says ironically.
Photos used:
Ivan Sekretarev / AP / TASS
90 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. cniza
    cniza 30 January 2017 08: 44
    +16
    It is not possible to ban a war, it can only be prevented and it is very difficult.
    1. himRa
      himRa 30 January 2017 08: 53
      +17
      I agree with this at the household level - let's not fight anymore! laughing
      But Judas himself must be banned! I’d be sitting in a foreign country like a mouse, otherwise I can initiate the investigation of crimes he committed!
      1. dik-nsk
        dik-nsk 30 January 2017 09: 32
        +6
        I support, and in general the United Nations, a dummy that has outlived itself like the League of Nations and the litter of overseas comrades.
        a proposal from the series “to the world - peace” and also on behalf of the person who carried out the largest geopolitical catastrophe of the new time, if Judah
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 30 January 2017 09: 40
          +10
          Behind the silly and absurd political proposal of Mishka Gorbachev, ears of servants and successors of the so-called "new world order" of the Bush, Clinton, Obama!
          This is their provocative political bandwagon to Trump and Putin in the international arena! This is a continuation of their policy!
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 30 January 2017 10: 03
            +12
            Quote: Tatiana
            Behind the silly and absurd political proposal of Mishka Gorbachev, ears of servants and successors of the so-called "new world order" of the Bush, Clinton, Obama!
            This is their provocative political bandwagon to Trump and Putin in the international arena! This is a continuation of their policy!

            If they have already pulled this leoperd toad into the light of God - Putin and Trump are doing everything right!
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter 30 January 2017 10: 48
                +6
                Once again, he was convinced that Brokeback was a showman. am
                1. Orionvit
                  Orionvit 30 January 2017 14: 53
                  +1
                  A showman is, by definition, a person who entertains the public. This same figure, not only does the overwhelming majority cause an attack of nausea, and even give his statements with insanity. What to prohibit? You might think that nuclear war at the UN is now resolved. Rave.
            2. Tatyana
              Tatyana 30 January 2017 11: 02
              +8
              Hi Paul!

              You know, I saw Mishka Gorbachev live at the opening of his exhibition dedicated to the 10 anniversary of the death of his wife Rasa Gorbacheva. I stood just a meter away from him.
              Honestly, he hit me then. He is above average (even tall), without gray hair or almost without gray hair (probably dyed), very youthful in his face, a snow-white shirt with a tie, a black impeccably sewn suit without dandruff, a sporty fit dressing, very neat, spoke without a piece of paper (as always ) and ohhhh very (!) artistic.
              Gorbachev voiced his speech - and then he was blown away by the wind! As if he was not here at all! The people did not expect this. His guard worked very professionally.
              Then it turned out that the audience was sorted out in advance on the basis of loyalty to Gorbachev (they didn’t let everyone in) - and still, Gorbachev from the audience (in my opinion, by invitation tickets) instantly disappeared. I went as a columnist from a public organization.

              M.S. Gorbachev is an incomparable example of a high-ranking Soviet political changeling in the international arena! (English School of Betrayal)
              1. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter 30 January 2017 11: 11
                +6
                Tatyana, my respect! hi We, it seems, switched to "you"? Well, that’s not the point. I already answered (see above my post).
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 30 January 2017 11: 20
                  +1
                  Ha! laughing Pasha! We didn’t switch to “you”! request When did you manage to switch to “you” ?! belay Keep your distance!
                  1. bouncyhunter
                    bouncyhunter 30 January 2017 11: 21
                    +7
                    No, no, I don’t insist.
                    1. Tatyana
                      Tatyana 30 January 2017 11: 28
                      +1
                      Quote: bouncyhunter
                      humpback - showman

                      The word "showman" to Gorbachev very accurately! Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye!
                      1. bouncyhunter
                        bouncyhunter 30 January 2017 11: 37
                        +9
                        Initially, I wanted to write a "corrupt fool" ... repeat
            3. your1970
              your1970 30 January 2017 11: 32
              +3
              let him say to our sworn "partners" -
              "The strategic command of the US armed forces as part of the Pentagon, together with intelligence agencies, are developing a new program to assess the ability of Russia and China to" survive a nuclear strike, "Bloomberg reports.
              The Congress ordered the military to evaluate the new parameters before the assumption of Donald Trump, and this promising task found the support of Democrats and Republicans. This assessment will include, for example, “the location and description of underground communications of political and military importance.”
          2. lis-ik
            lis-ik 30 January 2017 10: 19
            +1
            As he was a racketeer and populist, he remained, you need to remind yourself from time to time, that’s nonsense about the UN, although he knows very well that this organization is worthless.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Blondy
        Blondy 30 January 2017 14: 25
        +1
        Gorbachev: nuclear war should be banned at the UN.
        Insanity was strong
    2. Skeptic Self-Taught
      Skeptic Self-Taught 30 January 2017 08: 53
      +3
      Apparently, even elementary wisdom does not come to Gorbi's head for old age ...
      If you want to ban something - the first question is - who will control how and how?
      1. antivirus
        antivirus 30 January 2017 09: 46
        +1
        and for a long time I will be so kind to the people that ... I called for mercy for the fallen
      2. Saratoga833
        Saratoga833 30 January 2017 11: 47
        +2
        Old-old saying, "Wisdom comes with old age. Sometimes old comes alone." - fully applicable to Gorbachev. Raiska was alive - she lived with a near mind, she was gone - she got a complete imbecile!
    3. Teberii
      Teberii 30 January 2017 09: 01
      +2
      Nuclear weapons, deterrence weapons. As soon as such a decision is made, a war of global proportions will become inevitable.
    4. Topotun
      Topotun 30 January 2017 09: 14
      +5
      In addition, as far as I remember, our doctrine fully LETS apply nuclear weapons in case of a threat to the country's security. And the first. Otherwise, they will hammer us, even if not with nuclear weapons, and we will again have to ruin the peasants by the thousands, just because nuclear war is, as it were, forbidden?
    5. ziqzaq
      ziqzaq 30 January 2017 09: 14
      +3
      It was necessary to forbid the parents of humpback to multiply, so that there was no nuclear war ......
    6. Tatyana
      Tatyana 30 January 2017 09: 17
      +3
      Yeah, now! No matter how!
      Mishka Gorbachev once ruined our country and the countries of Eastern Europe - he ruined the USSR, ruined the Warsaw Pact, agreed with the USA that NATO would not move one step closer to the border lines of the Warsaw Pact countries! And where is all this ?!
      US presidents come and go, but the interests of militarists and financial capitalists remain!
      The old impudent Gorbachev - a senile and traitor, a bald "peacemaker" - before his death, decided to remind himself and now shit not only his homeland again, but the whole world - so to speak, finally, after himself, into the coffin to lead all of humanity into a nuclear fire! After all, he knows very well that there can be no uniform and equal disarmament, no matter how both sides agree! And historical practice has proved it!
      Gorbachev spoke out to discredit the personal international authority of Trump and Putin.
      M.S. Gorbachev Was a led “duRaK” of British and American intelligence - a led “duRaK” and will die! Surely the foreigners thought him up again - he didn’t get to that again with his own brains! You look, and he will receive money from someone for the funeral!
      1. cap
        cap 30 January 2017 09: 36
        +1
        Quote: Tatiana
        M.S. Gorbachev Was a led “duRaK” of British and American intelligence - a led “duRaK” and will die! Surely the foreigners thought him up again - he didn’t get to that again with his own brains! You look, and he will receive money from someone for the funeral!


        He received "For Victory in the Cold War", they gave the Nobel Peace Prize for the collapse of the USSR, now he plans to get a bribe for nuclear disarmament. Squeezing between D. Trump and V. Putin, emphasizing his importance. Reminds Poroshenko in Photoshop, I don’t remember who wandered around. I would sit in silence, waiting in the wings.
        I can imagine how much will be drunk in Russia on this occasion.
        1. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 30 January 2017 11: 52
          +3
          Do not forget that Medvedev even hung the order after him! So by wisdom, one does not outweigh the other!
      2. himRa
        himRa 30 January 2017 09: 37
        +6
        Even if we discard the impossibility of control, even if we discard all unaccounted factors, one thing remains: he wants to deprive Russia of having a deterrent any the aggressor! In the best case, the senile is more real and that traitor! The Americans have not long been proposing a reduction in nuclear weapons ...
    7. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 30 January 2017 09: 38
      +2
      First, we prohibit the UN nuclear war, as a first step, and even the UN, the solution of which no one is fulfilling. The second step.-Ban the UN nuclear weapons .. The third step, the UN will adopt a resolution on the destruction of nuclear weapons ... so what? Again, leave the state without a SHIELD!
      And how to ban nuclear wars in the presence of nuclear weapons themselves?
      It can be seen. GENSEKA gnawing resentment-Yeltsin opened a whole center in their homeland in Yekaterinburg. laughing
  2. Uncle Murzik
    Uncle Murzik 30 January 2017 08: 45
    +5
    hunchback gives out pearl after pearl! wassat
    1. himRa
      himRa 30 January 2017 08: 49
      +8
      Yes, he has senility! This must be prohibited! Not to be allowed to go to the media for a kilometer, Judah! I’d sit like a mouse, otherwise people can still initiate proceedings
      1. jovanni
        jovanni 30 January 2017 09: 11
        +5
        Quote: himRa
        Yes, he has senility! This must be prohibited! Not to be allowed to go to the media for a kilometer, Judah! I’d sit like a mouse, otherwise people can still initiate proceedings

        So the inaction of his family raises the question - is it really not a pity for the daughter that the media regularly bring out this old brainless doll for all to see? Someone for fun, and for many, like a living rebuke that they once committed his betrayal ... They would have already hidden him in some hospice ...
  3. himRa
    himRa 30 January 2017 08: 46
    +5
    This you must be prohibited ..... Judah !!! I would have closed my mouth so that it does not stink!
  4. Vasiliev Yu
    Vasiliev Yu 30 January 2017 08: 47
    +6
    Nuclear war will not be 100%, if the UN bans.
    Where was Humpbacked with his advice about the wars in Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Syria? An obvious cant of him, that the council did not give in time and reached the wars.
    One pleases, insanity clearly mows the ranks of the liberals.
    1. himRa
      himRa 30 January 2017 08: 59
      +4
      Quote: vasiliev yu
      Nuclear war will not be 100%, if the UN bans.

      Do not be naive, and do not express such thoughts to others! What will happen, what will not happen, we are not destined to know, but when the sapper shovel lies in the car, you feel more confident, especially when there is a response system even with a missed attack!
      1. Vasiliev Yu
        Vasiliev Yu 30 January 2017 09: 03
        +3
        For reference: I prefer black humor without a smile, with a serious face. No need to take everything here so literally seriously.
        1. himRa
          himRa 30 January 2017 09: 08
          +3
          Quote: vasiliev yu
          For reference: I prefer black humor without a smile, with a serious face. No need to take everything here so literally seriously.

          I understand ... now wassat
          For example, I prefer to speak out so that there is no double interpretation, otherwise such situations will be over and over again drinks
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 30 January 2017 10: 32
      0
      There will be nuclear war, there is a weapon and it will be used someday, the only question is who and against whom.
  5. mitrich
    mitrich 30 January 2017 08: 47
    +5
    Yes, with such rulers, not like enemies, and wars are not necessary. Ras ... they all go without them. Who is now interested in the opinion of this "useful idiot" of the West?
  6. ARES623
    ARES623 30 January 2017 08: 47
    +5
    "Gorbachev’s initiative to ban a nuclear war at the UN level seems somewhat frivolous to him."
    Gorbachev, in his declining years, generally became an "alien." Probably mowing under the insane, so as not to be dragged to court ...
  7. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 30 January 2017 08: 54
    +1
    Quote: Vasilyev u
    Nuclear war will not be 100%, if the UN bans.
    Where was Humpbacked with his advice about the wars in Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Syria? An obvious cant of him, that the council did not give in time and reached the wars.
    One pleases, insanity clearly mows the ranks of the liberals.

    Where, where !!! In Russia! . We sent by platoon and company into oblivion. Nuclear weapons were forbidden, undead! And he does not hiccup?
  8. Ham
    Ham 30 January 2017 08: 57
    +5
    this pseudo "Leopold" with its "let's live together!" (which is strange unilaterally) has already brought everyone to the zugunder ...
    and now it’s necessary to correct what this “peacemaker” has done because of which millions of people have died
  9. raid14
    raid14 30 January 2017 09: 00
    +3
    That is, he calls not to use nuclear weapons under any circumstances?
    Following his logic, if we (God forbid) are "democratized", then we must lock our nuclear arsenals on the key and throw the key away!
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 30 January 2017 09: 09
    +4
    Famous peacemaker, who passed for jeans and chewing gum of the Department of Internal Affairs and the USSR, sings an old song. am

    Interestingly, what is he counting on? What will they remember about him, but throw some grant?

    And it’s not frail to adopt resolutions prohibiting: color revolutions (any regime is automatically recognized as illegitimate), humanitarian bombing (any), unilateral sanctions (the UN is almost the whole of the General Assembly for this), foreign military bases, nuclear weapons in Europe (which is clearly illegal) etc?
  12. Altona
    Altona 30 January 2017 09: 09
    +7
    Gorbachev and Yeltsin had to be banned at the time. Henpecked and an alcoholic steamed the country.
  13. fedor13
    fedor13 30 January 2017 09: 09
    0
    He is not a paradise (very doubtful) hell will not be taken (high probability), the atom will begin perestroika. In Russia, it’s just not to let and forget !!!
    1. cap
      cap 30 January 2017 09: 43
      0
      Quote: fedor13
      He is not a paradise (very doubtful) hell will not be taken (high probability), the atom will begin perestroika. In Russia, it’s just not to let and forget !!!


      The devils will not be taken at no extra charge, because of the fear that perestroika will arrange. laughing
  14. Baloo
    Baloo 30 January 2017 09: 17
    +6
    I propose to ban Gorbachev in the military. Gorbachev’s audience is on ex-matzah and Lodzh, so let him remind you of himself. But he did not tell why he showed the cards of the General Staff M. Thatcher and where did he get these cards?
    1. cap
      cap 30 January 2017 09: 50
      +3
      Quote: Balu
      I propose to ban Gorbachev in the military. Gorbachev’s audience is on ex-matzah and Lodzh, so let him remind you of himself. But he did not tell why he showed the cards of the General Staff M. Thatcher and where did he get these cards?


      What for? Let him write and go to VO, learn a lot about himself. The assistants read D. Trump, which means that he can access it if there is Internet in the bunker. The fact that he likes to hide in basements is known even from Foros, where he and Raisa listened to the Air Force and the Voice of America, learning what is happening in Moscow. The President of the USSR ....... unprintable laughingFirst and last.
      And he probably ate the cards on the plane, washed down with Fanta so that they would not be taken for treason by the ramp.
  15. Skif83
    Skif83 30 January 2017 09: 19
    +5
    Usually, as history testifies, such "fighters" for peace lead the world to war!
    As they say, we will not leave stone upon stone in the struggle for peace ...
    And Gorby should be silent in a rag ...
  16. Tolstoevsky
    Tolstoevsky 30 January 2017 09: 19
    +1
    yeah. In both UNESCO and the Animal Welfare Society
  17. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 January 2017 09: 21
    +2
    As he was an idealist demagogue, so he remained.
    1. Tolstoevsky
      Tolstoevsky 30 January 2017 11: 25
      +1
      idealist? Come on. agent of influence
  18. kit-kat
    kit-kat 30 January 2017 09: 42
    +3
    If it comes to a decision on the use of nuclear weapons of mass destruction, then the United Nations, I think, will not ask anyone.
  19. Michael_59
    Michael_59 30 January 2017 09: 50
    +2
    There is more harm from a hunchback than from a bomb. Such rubbish itself would be prohibited, but to the point - the UN has long been talking about nothing. A tool in the hands of puppeteers.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 30 January 2017 12: 05
      +1
      Quote: Michael_59
      To prohibit such filth itself, but to sense


      This old writer does not belong to the UN. He sits in his wigwam in Germany and writes such opuses, maybe someone will pay, pills are now expensive. bully
  20. Senior manager
    Senior manager 30 January 2017 09: 54
    +2
    The dear grandfather decided to become famous once again, and maybe sclerosis or a dilution of thought. FSA the main seller of weapons in the UN Security Council will ban its source of income? Nonsense. A very constructive proposal in the face of ignoring international law and the loss of UN authority.
  21. region58
    region58 30 January 2017 09: 58
    +2
    It would be nice to ban fools. Eh ... dreams ...
  22. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 30 January 2017 10: 03
    +3
    It was not hell to sell the homeland! And now PR, as a defender of the maritime order!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 30 January 2017 10: 34
      +3
      He was a coward, and he remained a coward. You can’t fix it in any way - cowardice cannot be cured.
  23. Maz
    Maz 30 January 2017 10: 04
    +4
    Still alive? It's a pity. I would remember him perestroika.
  24. shultz21070
    shultz21070 30 January 2017 10: 12
    0
    Such a leader was to appear sooner or later, both in the USSR and in the USA. We were just less fortunate. But it was also impossible not to try to reform and disarm. And more than he did NOBODY in this direction all over the world. Thanks to this, we have no right to make claims that we are not doing anything to defuse tensions and disarmament. We once believed and tried, naively demonstrated a sincere desire, backed up by decisive action. Set a personal example. As a result, the illusions were dispelled and the understanding came that this should not be done. But I repeat: this attempt was inevitable, but untimely.
  25. Sergey F
    Sergey F 30 January 2017 10: 16
    0
    Still alive? May God grant him health, only with his senile advice would take away from politics!
    It is clear that the world's nuclear potential has reached a critical level, but so far there are local wars, and they should not be banned?
  26. annodomene
    annodomene 30 January 2017 10: 17
    +5
    In my opinion, it would be more correct to say: “Gorbachev must be banned at the UN” forever and ever. IMHO.
  27. You Vlad
    You Vlad 30 January 2017 10: 56
    +1
    What else can you expect from such a "speaker"? Just remember his past victories, but NATO's promises not to expand east! Baron Munchausen rests.
  28. Djuma-13
    Djuma-13 30 January 2017 10: 57
    +3
    ... I hope he is not buried in our land!
  29. Yuri11076
    Yuri11076 30 January 2017 11: 01
    +2
    And this hm about not yet died? Sorry, so sorry ...
  30. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf 30 January 2017 11: 05
    +1
    Bad man (censorship) this is Brokeback. Judas and a traitor.
  31. biserino
    biserino 30 January 2017 11: 28
    +1
    Quote: bouncyhunter

    If they have already brought this leoperd toad to the light of God ...


    And there was a time when bullets were shot in the head for treason.
    Now in Russia, democracy and this toad will probably be buried in Moscow with all honors.
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 30 January 2017 12: 03
      +1
      Quote: biserino
      Now in Russia, democracy and this toad will probably be buried in Moscow with all honors.

      God forbid! Deliver the Almighty Russian land from this scum!
  32. Lelek
    Lelek 30 January 2017 11: 59
    +1
    (“Nuclear war is unacceptable and cannot be waged under any circumstances”)

    Your mother forbidden But what did you not forbid when you were in power and lived in the USSR, and not as it is now in Germany?
  33. Oriental express
    Oriental express 30 January 2017 12: 28
    +2
    It is necessary to ban the Gorbachevs, Yeltsins and NATO!
  34. koshmarik
    koshmarik 30 January 2017 12: 31
    +1
    Somehow it is necessary to declare oneself - that's what drives without getting hit. In general, I would be silent in his place in a rag.
  35. ZVS
    ZVS 30 January 2017 12: 33
    0
    This Judas did everything to push the world towards a nuclear war, and now he is trying to give instructions.
    Gorbachev is moral.
  36. Vitalson
    Vitalson 30 January 2017 12: 38
    0
    Today, the situation on the planet looks as if the world is preparing for a global war, writes former USSR President Mikhail Gorbachev.


    Discovered America.
  37. Will
    Will 30 January 2017 13: 11
    +1
    Atomic weapons, as a way to think about the measure necessary for a simple being at this stage of development / underdevelopment of what is considered reasonable to "clean up" are clearly impossible, because so far education is not upbringing, but training.
  38. Zomanus
    Zomanus 30 January 2017 13: 25
    0
    This old fool generally wants to abandon nuclear weapons.
    Although it’s clear that only thanks to these weapons we forgot
    what is the real "world war".
    Nuclear weapons are deterrence weapons. For a nuclear war will last about an hour,
    everything else is just a debriefing and survival after the war.
  39. rfv0304
    rfv0304 30 January 2017 13: 38
    +1
    A TRAITOR has already survived from the mind! It’s a pity that everything will not be removed. Apparently, in the next world traitors and friends are not needed.
  40. weksha50
    weksha50 30 January 2017 13: 47
    +1
    "he proposes to adopt at a meeting of the Security Council a resolution stating that"nuclear war it is unacceptable and cannot be conducted under any circumstances. ” The initiative in this matter, according to Gorbachev, should come from Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. "...

    Firstly, Humpbacked again substitutes the country in which he was born and which he did not completely destroy ... Again he is looking for the notorious "consensus" ... To ban the nuclear war, thereby giving the United States an advantage with its predominantly high-precision weapons ...

    Secondly, Gorbach remained blind and deaf ... He does not see point-blank that the UN has not been solving anything practically and really for a long time ... The talk shop against practical actions is not even zero, but a huge minus ...
  41. Operator
    Operator 30 January 2017 13: 57
    0
    Gorbachev is a senile and Russophobe, married to a karaite (therefore, he was dragged to the top).
  42. pussamussa
    pussamussa 30 January 2017 14: 01
    +1
    The damage that our country has suffered from the rule of humpback and ebony is much greater than from nuclear war. So it’s better to ban Gorbachev.
  43. Maki Avellevich
    Maki Avellevich 30 January 2017 14: 34
    0
    Gorbachev: nuclear war must be banned at the UN


    Right. Cretinism is also time
  44. 1536
    1536 30 January 2017 16: 21
    0
    When there was a system of socialist states, despite the fact that many of them had to be dated, then war was not inevitable, because otherwise one of the systems won. And socialism, with its socialization of property, was more likely to win, because its economy could somehow withstand even the loss of 70-80% of potential. The remaining people could revive that which perished.
    Now, when the question is not about the suppression of another system, but about the suppression of some or other elements of this and the only world system of the system, nuclear war can really destroy all of humanity. And there will be no chance of a revival, because the remaining 20-30% of the world's population will simply not be able to even simply reproduce, since they will not be interested in it on the one hand, and, on the other, will not be able to understand what is needed to revive. It will be a futuristic society of half-beasts, half-humans, fighting only for survival, food, satisfaction of their physiological desires. Such a shift occurred during these 25 years after the collapse of the USSR, the destruction of the countries of socialism, and the destruction of the entire socialist system in the world.
    This is to blame for Gorbachev and the venal top of the CPSU, which he led, who then received support among virtually declassed elements, who subsequently seized power and means of production. It was his empty dreams that led to the fact that mankind has lost its margin of safety, based on the human principle - humanism, psychology and reason, ideas about preserving the future in the name of descendants, ideas of self-improvement and scientific knowledge of the world. It was Gorbachev’s “new thinking in the nuclear age”, based on Trotskyism, the ideas of convergence and globalization, that led mankind to a standstill. Now, not a single UN can turn back the clock. However, this individual, fully prepared to live even after the modern nuclear war, as if he was preparing everything "for himself", again wants his voice to be heard. This is no accident, it again smells of deception, the deception of those who are young and do not remember what this subject did! I also have the "return of the Jedi."
  45. iouris
    iouris 30 January 2017 17: 42
    0
    Gorby agreed with everyone on the non-expansion of NATO, on friendship with Germany. So what?! Now, it turns out, another nuclear war must be banned. Who allowed Gorbachev?
  46. loaln
    loaln 30 January 2017 17: 48
    0
    Gorbachev: nuclear war needs to be banned ...


    And more fools and Judas in politics. You don’t get anything except verbal diarrhea.
  47. razved
    razved 30 January 2017 20: 09
    0
    This old r.v.o.lo.h.ch. offers this not at all from thoughtlessness. All the time trying to spoil Russia.
  48. Disorder
    Disorder 30 January 2017 20: 15
    0
    And why did this miracle come out of the dust closet, did the money run out?
  49. faterdom
    faterdom 30 January 2017 21: 14
    +1
    clinical. For those who are really capable of arranging an exchange of nuclear strikes (I would not even call it a war, this is a complete apocalypse!) The UN opinion on this matter is somehow absolutely not important.
    The UN was created as a platform for resolving issues, or blocking them just in order not to have to solve them by force. And now they are trying to blur this structure, to chat, like "to deprive someone of the veto."
    And what in return?
    So humpbacks with their nonsense are likened to all pangimoons ...
  50. biserino
    biserino 30 January 2017 22: 00
    0
    Quote: Trouble
    And why did this miracle come out of the dust closet, did the money run out?

    Conscience tortured?