MiG-29 and Su-27: the history of service and competition. Part of 2
New Times
Since 1991, the process of degradation of the armed forces of the USSR, and then of Russia, began. All subsequent processes had a negative impact on all types of aircraft of the Air Force, Air Defense and the Navy, but it was the MiG-29 that received the most painful blows. Of course, with the exception of those types that were simply completely destroyed before the service life expired (Su-17М, MiG-21, MiG-23, MiG-27).
Of the 4th generation fighters in the Soviet aviation MiG-29 was the most massive. However, after the division of the army between the Union republics in the Russian Air Force, the number of 29s actually equaled the number of Su-27s. A large number of MiGs, and quite fresh ones, remained in the Union republics. For example, almost all aircraft of this type of 1990 were sold to Belarus and Ukraine, because literally on the eve of the collapse of the Union they saturated the shelves in Starokonstantinov and Osovtsy. Aircraft from the "group of forces" mostly ended up in Russia - and these were not the newest aircraft from 1985-1988. Also in the Russian Federation there were also aircraft of the very first releases, received in 1982-1983 at the 4th Center for Combat Use.
The situation with the Su-27 turned out to be better mainly due to the fact that mass production of this type began later than the MiG-29, and the entire 27's fleet was generally newer. In addition, the bulk of the Su-27 stationed in the territory of the RSFSR and the loss on the "division" of the Soviet inheritance between the former fraternal republics did not undermine their numbers so much. Of particular interest is the following figure: the average age of the aircraft inherited by Russia for the 1995 year was 9,5 years for MiG-29 and 7 years for Su-27.
The initial balance of the system of two fighters was broken. Suddenly, the fleet of mass light fighter became almost less in size than the heavy fighter fleet. The very meaning of dividing into two types in this situation became rather absurd. Looking ahead, we can say that in the future the decline of the 29-x fleet occurred faster than the 27-x. Thus, in 2009, the United Air Force and Air Defense of the Russian Federation included 265 MiG-29 of old types, 326 Su-27 and 24 of newly built MiG-29СМТ (presumably intended for Algeria, which was abandoned in 2008 year). Naturally, in this number, far from all the aircraft were in a flying state, but the total number on the balance also suggests that the “heavy” fighter became more massive than the “light” one.
As mentioned above, several other qualities were sacrificed to the mass in the Soviet fighters. In particular, the assigned resource, which for the MiG-29 was installed in 2500 hours or 20 years. More is simply not required. The redundant resource was not needed by the front-line fighter, which at the beginning of a full-scale war will die without flying off, perhaps the 100 hours. On the other hand, the speed with which the military equipment was improved during the Cold War, required regular updates. The aircraft was aging over 20 years. In 1960, the MiG-21 seemed to be a guest from the future, and in 1980 against the background of the MiG-29 - quite the contrary, a guest from the past. Consequently, it is not profitable to make an airplane with a 40-50 resource for years - it will just need to be written off, without spending a reserve on 50%. However, in the 90-e years, the situation has changed dramatically. The rapid change of generations of technology slowed down, and the savings required the maximum support for existing machines in the ranks. In these circumstances, the key opportunity to extend the life of the aircraft was the extension of the resource. However, in the case of the MiG-29, such work was not actually carried out. In reality, the aircraft, withdrawn to Russia, gradually stopped flying, getting up for a long time funny. Under the open sky, without any conservation. All this led to the fact that already in 2010-e years, the design of a set of machines became useless.
The Su-27 initially had a resource approximately the same as that of the MiG-29 - 2000 watches and 20 years of service. The devastating consequences of the collapse of the USSR affected it, but air defense planes flew all the same a little more often. As for the MiG-31, it was saved by an initially robust design, designed for flying at high speeds and an abundance of titanium and steel alloys in the structure. Therefore, the park 29-x has undergone the most landslide cuts. When aviation again began to fly in the 2010, it was the 29 that appeared to be in the worst condition.
The entire period of destruction and degradation in the 90-e and 00-e years, almost no equipment was purchased. KB had to survive as they could. And in these conditions, luck just smiled at the Sukhoi Design Bureau. One of the main customers of the Su-27 and the new Su-30 are China and India. The People's Republic of China has acquired a license for the assembly of the Su-27, and the total sales abroad have amounted to at least 200 Su-27 and 450 Su-30. The number of MiG-29 sold during the same period was much lower. There are various reasons for this. First, the largest customers experienced an acute need for an aircraft with the size and characteristics of the Su-27 / 30. This is primarily India and China. They had enough light fighters of their development in abundance. And the machine of the MiG-29 class was simply not needed (China) or was purchased in limited quantities (India). On the other hand, Russian exporters had obvious delight from sales of Dryers, and they began to pay less attention to the advancement of the MiG, realizing that once the demand for Dryers began, it was necessary to unwind it as much as possible. In terms of trade, it is quite logical and correct.
To the Sukhoi firm, foreign orders allowed us to keep production in tune (KnAAPO and Irkut), and to work on serious improvements in the Su-27. Anyway, this fact has to be considered. It was Sukhoi that received hard currency from abroad, and this became a serious trump card.
Combining Air Force and Air Defense
The next step in the destruction of the "peaceful" coexistence of the two fighters began scrapping the Soviet concept of the distribution of tasks between the Air Force and Air Defense. In 1998, the air defense forces are reorganized and merged with the Air Force. Frontal aviation, in fact, is also ceasing to exist - now we are talking about a single, universal form of the armed forces. The Soviet system with individual air defense forces was caused by the extraordinary importance of the task of protection of its territory, which is constantly violated reconnaissance aircraft of the NATO countries. There was a danger plaque massive strike aircraft with the nuclear weapons on key objects of the country.
But at the same time such an organization was extremely costly. All structures were parallelized - management, pilot training, supply, administrative apparatus. And this is despite the fact that there were no principal obstacles for the inclusion of air force front-line fighters in the air defense. Technical issues (the difference between communication frequencies, radar frequencies, guidance and control algorithms) were surmountable. The only consideration that can be taken as essential is the impossibility of the fighters of one regiment to simultaneously provide the country's air defense system and follow the moving front of the ground forces. In Soviet times it was important. Frontal aviation was supposed to support the ground forces, without any distraction. At the same time, the simultaneous commencement of hostilities by land armies and a massive raid on cities in the USSR was considered the norm. That is, the Air Defense and Air Forces had to act simultaneously in different places - in such a situation the distribution of duties was inevitable.
With the collapse of the USSR and the reduction of funding, it became impossible to maintain two structures - the air defense and the air force. The merger was a matter of time, and in a certain sense justified. Nowhere in the world, even in countries with a large area, are not allocated separately air defense forces. Minimizing costs leads to the creation of universal fighters. Currently, in fact, the tasks of air defense are relevant only in peacetime and in a period of threat. With the beginning of a full-scale conflict with NATO, Russia is unlikely to immediately begin an active offensive against the West, rather it is about the defense of its territory, i.e. about the classic air defense task, it will be easy to hide behind not only command and control centers, but also your troops. Aviation has become too expensive a resource to solve such highly specialized tasks. In addition, the invasion of masses of bombers is not expected - the payload in the form of cruise missiles occurs at frontiers unattainable for the air defense missile systems and fighters of the defending side. With a high probability after the reflection of the first massive raid, the country's air defense task will become not very relevant - either the nuclear end of the world will come, or the confrontation will shift to the plane of land army combat operations, without repeated massive raids on the cities of the country. The enemy will simply not have enough cruise missiles for several massive strikes, and the use of time-delayed use will not allow Russia in the short term to inflict decisive damage under conditions of surprise. Finally, the country's defended facilities cover not only fighters, but also air defense missile systems, which are not planned to be moved to the front-line lane with the outbreak of hostilities.
In addition, serious changes occurred in the nature of the front-line aviation. In particular, not every conflict today is accompanied by the existence of a well-defined front line, and aviation has to operate in a difficult situation, eliminating the steady presence of the rear and its air control system. Of course, the wars with the classical front also did not disappear anywhere - but there is an expansion of the tasks and their complication for aviation, which was considered frontline in the USSR.
In the united structure, called “Air Force and Air Defense”, and then “VKS”, the two fighters became crowded. MiG-29, although it was an excellent front-line fighter, was less well-adapted for air defense missions. It can be argued that the MiG-23, similar in TTX, solved the air defense tasks quite successfully. This is true, but the MiG-23 did it in the conditions of unlimited funding of the Soviet period. Then it was possible to afford to have a fleet of "heavy" fighter-interceptors (MiG-25, -31 and Su-15) and a fleet of light interceptors. Their dislocation depended on the spatial scope of the covered ones. In particular, there was no MiG-23 in the Urals and central Siberia at all. But in modern conditions, the maintenance of such a motley fleet has become impossible - something had to be sacrificed. And in the air defense forces at the time of unification in 1998, 23's almost did not remain (as well as Su-15 and MiG-25), but all Su-27 and MiG-31 remained. With the exception of the former Soviet republics.
When asked about reductions and savings, the military naturally wanted to give away something that has more modest combat capabilities — that is, light fighters. At first they went under the write-off of the MiG-21 and 23, and when they ran out, and the end and edge cuts were not visible, I had to start gradually giving back to the 29. In matters of procurement was the same, if we were given something to buy, then I wanted to get the most powerful weapons, i.e. Sukhoi aircraft. This is logical, because the Su-27 could solve problems inaccessible to the MiG-29. Initially, the “dual” assignment for Su-27 for Air Force FA and Air Defense Force became a significant advantage.
In addition, the universalization of tactical aviation around the world has also taken the form of shock missions throughout the world. The American F-16 and F-15 have learned how to work effectively on ground targets. Disadvantages of avionics are compensated for overhead sighting containers. Specialization is maintained only in highly specific areas, such as “attack”, where such aircraft as the A-10 are still in service. In Russia, work has also begun in this direction, both at MiG and at Sukhoi. However, here Drying looked preferable. The fact is that the suspension of the entire 29-x bombs caliber 4 kg became the limit of the combat shock load of the MiG-500. While the Su-27 could take twice as much. MiG-35 can take 6 FAB-500, but Su-30 - already 10, and Su-34 to 16 FAB-500. At the same time, our Air Forces failed to completely abandon the specialized bomber aircraft - the Su-34 went into the series, while nowhere in the world did anyone build such planes.
Due to foreign orders, Sukhoi aircraft were constantly ready for operation and production. They implemented measures to extend the resource to 3000 watches from Su-30 and to 6000 watches from Su-35. All of this could have been done for MiG-29, but the MiG company did not have such wide opportunities in view of much more modest financing - there were an order of magnitude less foreign orders. And there was no interest from the domestic customer. Not the last role was played by the image of the company Sukhoi, beautifully showing their cars at exhibitions. Well, the administrative resource - Sukhoi dragged himself and the entire meager flow of public funds. The latter is very annoying aviators of other companies, and there is some truth in this. However, in the new market conditions everyone is forced to survive as they can. Sukhoi did it successfully. It is always convenient to blame the state - they did not create conditions, did not support other manufacturers. This is of course all true, and there is a reason to criticize the state. But on the other hand, in conditions of limited means, the choice is very bad - either to give everyone a little bit, or to give one, but a lot. Both options have their pros and cons. In any case, a similar situation with the adoption of two combat helicopters (Ka-52 and Mi-28) for use at once does not look like the ideal solution.
As a result, the situation with the "main" fighter itself was oriented to its original position, when only one heavy fighter was considered when announcing the TFI competition in 70. The MiG-29 fleet died out faster than other Russian aircraft, and the replenishment began with a weak streamlet of Sukhoi-only machines.
Prospects
In 2007, the MiG introduced the “promising” MiG-35 fighter. The word “promising” is taken in quotation marks because the aircraft was based on the very same MiG-29, created at the end of 70's. If this is really our perspective, then, as stated in one funny movie, “your deeds are bad, comrade conscript.” And this is not at all a bias towards the aircraft of the MiG firm, because we are talking about the future, which actually is not, neither Su-35, nor Su-34, nor Su-30, nor MiG-35.
The only promising fighter-bomber of our Air Force is the PAK-FA. The situation with modern supplies looks in this light rather absurd. Airplanes are being bought, the effectiveness of which against the background of foreign F-35, F-22 and domestic PAK-FA, to put it mildly, is controversial. The idea is shocking, especially for a patriotic public, but the essence is exactly that. To some extent, the current situation can be justified by the fact that you have to fly on something, you have to load industry with something. Until the last engineers, workers and pilots from the combat regiments ran away. All this had to be done at the end of 90's, but for obvious reasons we started only a couple of years ago.
Su-30 and Su-35 are good, but they were needed in the mass series 10 years ago. Nevertheless, the fact that in the interests of the Air Force they have been producing quite a lot for several years is still welcome. Let these planes be inferior in all characteristics to the promising PAK-FA - they have a key advantage - they are going to the combat units today, while the PAK-FA is still being tested. This also favorably distinguishes them against the background of highly experienced MiG vehicles.
Su-34 is produced in principle for the same reasons as Su-30 / 35 - you have to fly on something, because the Su-24 resource is not infinite, and they are slowly becoming a thing of the past. However, as mentioned above, today’s aviation is too expensive to have such highly specialized aircraft as the Su-34 bomber. Nowhere in the world, even in the rich, can the US afford it. Let fighters in the role of strike aircraft lose some of their effectiveness (all American fighters, while working on ground targets, are still less effective than the F-111 and F-117 written off earlier), but the savings are simply enormous. It would be much more logical to produce the same Su-34 instead of the 30 in an increased quantity. However, obviously, inertness of thinking impedes us in this matter. But the situation will become even less clear and logical when the serial PAC-FA appears. Shock missions due to powerful avionics, high speed and low visibility will solve many times more efficiently than the Su-34. What place and role will then be assigned to this bomber? Understand difficult. Unless PAK-FA will clear the corridor for him, mowing the air defense system in the enemy's air defense system. And then, in the resulting gaps, not covered by air defense, Su-34 will be introduced. Nevertheless, the Su-34 is again good because it has already been brought to mass production and more than a dozen cars are in service.
The MiG-31 survived in the 90 and 00, mainly due to its robust design, which survived a long downtime on earth without catastrophic consequences for power elements. However, the avionics of this aircraft, shaking the imagination in the 80-s, today does not look unique. The combat capabilities of the F-35, Rafale and EF-2000 smaller in size are no worse, and in a number of parameters even better than those of the 31. The speeds and heights of the MiG today are not claimed. And the cost of operation - just space. Obviously, the aircraft will last until the end of the resource and will not be replaced by anything “similar” in the new generation. The same PAK-FA solves all the tasks assigned to the MiG-31 more efficiently. A highly specialized high-altitude interceptor today is just as expensive as a bomber, and therefore an extinct species.
And what about the MiG-35? With him, as usual, the most difficult. He would have had every chance of playing the role of a light fighter of a transitional period, similarly to the Su-30 / 35, if in the 2007 year it was tested, brought to mass production and the question was only in its purchases. However, in the 2017 year there are only a few prototypes, the flight tests of which, although close to completion, are still not finished. The series is scheduled for 2018 year. And while this series is limited to symbolic 30-y machines. More like an attempt to prevent the “sick” from dying completely. There is a logical question - why? There is already a “transitional” aircraft in the form of Su-30 / 35, which has been supplied in significant quantities for several years. Starting production in the 2018 year, the MiG-35 will actually become the same age as the PAK-FA, in a situation where between them, despite all the “+” after the 4 digit in the generation designation, lies a gigantic abyss. And this is in conditions when our “potential friend” buys already the third hundred F-35 fighter jets. Sadly, the prospects for the MiG-35 is extremely small. It does not have a decisive advantage in terms of performance characteristics over Sukhoi’s machines, it is absolutely inferior to the PAK-FA and is still in the “experienced” stage, i.e. behind in terms of commissioning of the Su-30 / 35, and possibly even from the PAK-FA.
What kind of fighter does the air force need today?
The Russian air force needs, first of all, a heavy fighter-bomber with a long range and powerful air-borne equipment.
Heavy 90-e strongly reduced airfield network, which in the Soviet years did not cover the country completely. There is no hope for a full revival, and even in the case of the partial commissioning of closed airfields, the coverage will remain insufficient.
To control the vast expanses, you need an aircraft with a long flight time and the ability to quickly reach the intercept line. With regard to avionics, even in 80-s, the rule was derived that an increase in the mass of the equipment by 1 kg entails an increase in the weight of the glider by 9 kg. Since then, this ratio may have become less extreme, due to some decrease in the proportion of electronics, but the principle is unlikely to change dramatically. Have a powerful avionics can only be on a large plane. A heavy fighter will always win at the expense of a powerful avionics in long-range combat from a light fighter. In particular, the range of steady radar contact directly depends on the area of the radar antenna, which is greater, the larger the aircraft on which it is located. In a duel duel, a group of heavy fighters has a chance to first detect the enemy and attack first, with all the ensuing consequences. The first losses, even before establishing visual contact, always inflict a heavy psychological blow on the enemy, reduce his strength before entering the melee, and thereby contribute to success.
A large supply of fuel on a heavy fighter can be converted not to a greater range, but to the possibility of longer for an enemy on a light fighter to retain the ability to maneuver during afterburner without fear of wasting fuel ahead of time. Or in the possibility of a long time to patrol in the area, waiting for the enemy or call for support of ground forces. The latter is especially important - the infantrymen will not have to wait until the attack aircraft or light fighter take off and reach them - the strike will follow many times faster.
With the universalization of tactical aviation, a heavy fighter effectively accomplishes percussion tasks, delivering a substantially larger mass of bombs to a target, or a load comparable to a light fighter, but at twice the long range. The pre-existing advantages of light fighters in a maneuverable melee are fully leveled by modern advances in wing mechanization, controlled thrust vectoring and aircraft control automation.
MiG-29 / 35, unfortunately, does not fit into the future needs of the Air Force. This does not mean that it is a bad plane - quite the opposite. The plane turned out great, and ideally corresponds to the technical task. He ideally suited the front-line aviation of the USSR Air Force. However, the problem is that there is no longer a front-line aviation of the USSR Air Force. Conditions have changed. Money for defense is no longer allocated "as much as necessary." Therefore, the choice will have to do.
In the US, too, have their wonderful aircraft - F-16, for example. But there no one betrays this fighter as promising. They are working on a brand new F-35. This work is not without difficulties. However, it is a difficult step, but a step into the future. What can be said about the MiG-35. Americans squeezed out of the design of the F-16 exactly as much as it was possible to squeeze, without harm and competition for the new generation. What are we doing? By the year 2020, when the Americans get their 400 F-35, we will only begin production of the aircraft, which was supposed to appear in the 90-e. Backlog in 30 years. The only argument in favor of the production of the MiG-35 is the desire to support the renowned MiG company, which you really don't want to lose.
***
A picky reader might think that the author has set a goal to throw mud at a wonderful plane - the MiG-29 and its descendants in the form of the MiG-35. Or offend the staff of the company MiG. Not at all. The situation is not the fault of the team, and the MiG aircraft are excellent. It was not their fault that the wonderful technical solutions and the beautiful aircraft fell out of the once-harmonious weapon system, and the upgrades were not implemented on time. The main question is to let it all be so, but is it not worthwhile today to concentrate on creating something new than to give out planes from the past (even if they are excellent planes), for the great achievement of the present and future.
Использованная литература:
P. Plunsky, V. Antonov, V. Zenkin, and others. “Su-27. Start stories, M., 2005.
S.Moroz “Front-line fighter MiG-29”, Exprint, M.
N. Yakubovich “MiG-29. Fighter of the Unknowns ”, Yauza, M., 2011.
Aviation and Cosmonautics magazine 2015-2016 A series of articles "There was such aircraft", S. Drozdov.
“Su-27SK aircraft. Flight manual.
“The combat use of the MiG-29. Methodological manual pilot "
“The technique of piloting and aircraft navigation aircraft MiG-29. Methodological manual pilot "
Airwar.ru
Russianplanes.net
- Alexey Alex_59 Polyakov
- http://russianplanes.net/
- https://topwar.ru/107787-mig-29-i-su-27-istoriya-sluzhby-i-konkurencii-chast-1.html
Information