Trump announced the beginning of a "large-scale restructuring" of the American army

72
In the US, the new Secretary of Defense was sworn in - 66-year-old John Mattis. At the same time, the American press notes that for the entire post-war period (meaning story United States after the Second World War) is only the second case in the country, when a retired soldier is appointed Minister of Defense. The first was the appointment of General George Marshall to the post of head of the Pentagon.

US President Donald Trump, who took the floor after the ceremony, said that he intends to carry out a “serious reform” in the American army. It drew attention to the fact that in his speech, Trump eventually replaced the word “reform” with a variant of the word “large-scale restructuring”.

Trump announced the beginning of a "large-scale restructuring" of the American army


The US media cites a fragment of a statement by the White House host:
Today I intend to sign a decree on large-scale restructuring in our armed forces. New aircraft, new ships, new resources and new tools for our people in the form.


According to Trump, the military department "will move away from the practice of torture of persons suspected of terrorism." In addition, in the text of the document that the US President is preparing to sign, it is noted that the Pentagon "will conduct an analysis of the missile defense system."

After the oath, the activity immediately decided to show Mattis himself. According to him, he has already ordered the start of testing the program of the X-NUMX-generation F-5 aircraft. According to the new head of the US Department of Defense, "the cost of the program is too high." Mattis added:

The Deputy Minister of Defense should monitor the verification of the F-35 program in order to reduce its cost.
  • FOXNews
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mad
    +7
    28 January 2017 07: 47
    Translated - abydic! F-35 drank without us! Well, nothing, let's start our own project:
    New planes, new ships, new resources and new tools for our people in shape.
    1. +4
      28 January 2017 08: 23
      "retired soldier" - will not cope! What's in America furniture factories, with promising directors, or not at all ... laughing
      1. +9
        28 January 2017 09: 26
        Hi Zhenya ! hi drinks I would have looked at the place of mattresses, following the example of the Teutons of some gynecologist, to look for the Minister of Defense ... feel
        1. +5
          28 January 2017 09: 29
          Good afternoon, Pasha! hi

          Germany is a slave country, so gynecologists are appointed there, and the United States is the type of host country, so you need your own Taburetkin, otherwise they can start jiving in Russia ... laughing
  2. +9
    28 January 2017 07: 48
    After reading the word "perestroika" I remembered Gorbachev alone? And how it all ended lol
    1. +7
      28 January 2017 08: 12
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      After reading the word "perestroika" I remembered Gorbachev alone? And how it all ended


      I suggest that they (the mattresses), as a good gesture to Russia, hand over the team of Serdyuk-Vasiliev as advisers to the new Minister of Defense!

      And they will have both reform and perestroika in one bottle!

      Gorbachev is resting!
    2. +3
      28 January 2017 08: 21
      Why does it have to end like ours?
      1. +1
        28 January 2017 08: 25
        Quote: Deniska999
        Why does it have to end like ours?

        And why not?
        1. +2
          28 January 2017 08: 35
          You saw a familiar word and, knowing how the perestroika ended with us, you make hasty conclusions about its results in the USA.
          1. +3
            28 January 2017 11: 24
            Quote: Deniska999
            You saw a familiar word and, knowing how the perestroika ended with us, you make hasty conclusions about its results in the USA.

            Perestroika then means that the system will be scrapped and further improved. Modernization - improving the system, without scrapping. USSR rebuilt - China modernized. The difference is not visible with the naked eye))) Here Russia is currently being modernized. The United States is going to rebuild, break the system of globalism into the system of "America First." Humpbacked to help them)))
      2. +2
        28 January 2017 08: 31
        Because we judge by ourselves. (And they are not going to rebuild the state and their president is not a combine operator ...)
    3. 0
      28 January 2017 09: 00
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      After reading the word "perestroika" I remembered Gorbachev alone? And how it all ended

      Here, rather, Serdyukov’s modernization and optimization are closer - it concerns only the army soldier
    4. 0
      28 January 2017 10: 54
      Perestroika, perestroika, and somewhere overseas, an old man with a spot on his bald head began to hiccup without stopping.
  3. 0
    28 January 2017 07: 53
    According to Trump, the military department "will move away from the practice of torture against people suspected of terrorism"
    As simple as that, for this it is necessary to declare all detainees terrorists.
  4. +1
    28 January 2017 08: 03
    Trump moves along the marked path - the first stage, perestroika, the second stage - skirmish, and the third stage - roll call lol The first stage has begun, we are waiting for results like "new thinking", "one hundred days of the capitalist economy"! lol
    1. +9
      28 January 2017 08: 20
      No, we are not waiting. Do not expect. Trump is an experienced businessman, several times able to rise from the bottom to the top. This is not a rag Gorbachev without a king in his head.
      1. +5
        28 January 2017 10: 38
        08.20. Greenwood! The fact that it is not a rag, it seems to be already visible. It will be visible the second Roosevelt (or Trump first). The term of his presidency is limited to 4 years (unless shot earlier). We have no results either after 16 or after 25 years. I think their reforms will advance rapidly. Not comparable to our pace. I want a decisive president with us. Putin clearly clearly loses to Trump in decisiveness, and in 4 years he will be very noticeable in business.
      2. +1
        28 January 2017 11: 02
        Quote: Greenwood
        Trump is an experienced businessman who has managed to rise from the bottom to the top several times.

        That is, there were still periods of decline? And now I want such a period by A. Merzsky sun so that we can recover a little.
        1. +6
          28 January 2017 11: 56
          We must work ourselves, and not want the cow to die in the neighbor's house.
          1. +2
            29 January 2017 14: 57
            Quote: Greenwood
            We must work ourselves, and not want the cow to die in the neighbor's house.

            Please specify, but have you already begun to work? After all, the overall results are made up of specific participants. And here, unfortunately, liberals are above the roof. Recall the time after the civil war and after the Great Patriotic War. All, or almost all, in one fit restored the national economy. And now, as in Krylov’s fable. Evaluate the work of our "beloved" "government. Some liberals. Settled, you can’t drive them out. Instead of normal education, schools plan to introduce the history of cinema, etc. e. Elementary-multiplication tables do not know. Yes, and how they will know - on smart notebooks smart publishers print it with errors. One teacher told me that it’s like jokes ... Here they give us cool knowledge ... As a result - cool achievements ...
  5. +3
    28 January 2017 08: 04
    Quote: mad
    Translated - abydic! F-35 drank without us! Well, nothing, let's start our own project:
    New planes, new ships, new resources and new tools for our people in shape.

    You shouldn’t be so. The United States has enormous military and technical potential. And even though the bureaucracy and treasury are huge there, you don’t have to evaluate them. We understand this well and are building up such opportunities that they need to get to for a long time. the scarce budget of the military-industrial complex, and the country's economy.
    1. +5
      28 January 2017 08: 27
      In the USSR, there was also a huge military-technical potential, maybe even more powerful. So what? Forgot how it ended? The army is a mirror image of the state. If the state is in crisis (and in the states it is, but such that if it cracks, it will not seem to the whole world), then in the army, respectively. If in the Union the crisis was caused artificially as a result of the betrayal of senior management, then the Western predatory system has simply exhausted itself. The worst thing is that Western countries solve their crises by unleashing world wars. Moreover, they themselves can strongly and not participate, it is enough to pit others.
      1. +2
        28 January 2017 09: 04
        Quote: Orionvit
        The worst thing is that Western countries solve their crises by unleashing world wars.

        I guess, yes Yes Only not global in the literal sense of the word, but as applied to modern realities, local. Grabanuli some thread country (preferably where there is what you need) and for five years live and spit on the ceiling. feel Everyone is afraid of your strength, the bubble of faith in green papers is further inflated, the defense industry is pulling the economy, etc. We will repair everything wassat
        1. +2
          28 January 2017 09: 25
          Yeah, local, only on a global scale. That is, wherever possible. As you said
          bubble of faith in green papers
          In the era of the dollar, there is no need to rob anyone directly, just print green papers and the whole world itself will bring everything you need. Well, often you have to change unwanted political regimes, bomb the obstinate countries, organize pro-American color revolutions, in a word, bring democracy to the world. What can you do, the costs of world domination. They just forgot that it cannot always go on like this. Therefore, my forecast. There will still be a big war. The West urgently needs to relieve the accumulated tension, and preferably at the expense of Russia and China. And if in Russia once again there are traitors like Gorbachev (and such a rampart), then the West will succeed.
          1. 0
            28 January 2017 09: 43
            Quote: Orionvit
            In the era of the dollar, there is no need to rob anyone directly, just print green papers and the whole world itself will bring everything you need. Well, often you have to change unwanted political regimes, bomb the obstinate countries, organize pro-American color revolutions, in a word, bring democracy to the world. What can you do, the costs of world domination.

            Personally, I do not see a difference in this case request
            Quote: Orionvit
            The West urgently needs to relieve the accumulated tension, and preferably at the expense of Russia and China.

            Well, yes, and even the ever-growing debt raises questions. But on the bill
            Quote: Orionvit
            There will still be a big war.

            I doubt No. Qualitatively different weapons now and the otvetka will not take long. Although, if the West has a steel sphincter (which I do not agree with), then everything is possible what And then in the event that they can still really expose (or provoke) us as an aggressor. request
            1. +2
              28 January 2017 11: 18
              09.43. Rurikovich! What’s the debt then? When the whole world is in ruin, who will demand debt? And when everything is in ruins, it will be possible to give loans for the purchase of their products, than drive them into debt and dependence. Yes, you can still create an international organization with your money. Here Germany won’t be able to return its gold from storage in the USA, and you are talking about debts. About the quality of weapons today is also not necessary. Each weapon has a cost. Fighting is the cost of the cost of defeat. If we bomb fuel trucks from airplanes and fire rockets, then this is very expensive. The cost of a rocket and the cost of a fuel truck. Here we economically spent very stupidly, even wastefully. But color revolutions with small arms are very cheap and effective. Today there is a nuclear weapon. But who is fighting them? No. Fighting with small arms (cheap) weapons. There is also a technique. Toyota won its jeeps with ready-made mounts for the installation of machine guns. We began to supply UAZ with machine guns to Syria. But it is still less expensive than the use of aviation and missiles. Amertsians use aviation. and very effective. Civilians are being bombed, army support is weakening. That’s all the tactics and strategy of modern warfare. And everything happens without confrontation between troops in WWII or in the Second World War.
              1. 0
                28 January 2017 15: 27
                Quote: Region 34
                What’s the debt then?

                It doesn’t bother - it is given as an indicator of the function wassat Western financial institutions hi
                Quote: Region 34
                Here Germany won’t be able to return its gold from storage in the USA, and you are talking about debts

                And who will give the vassal gold belay I beg of you laughing
                Quote: Region 34
                About the quality of weapons today is also not necessary.

                Oh well, and the likelihood that you will in any case receive change is no longer taken into account? Or to us, as in the sandbox - "chur, only without nuclear" wink ?
                Quote: Region 34
                If we bomb fuel trucks from airplanes and fire rockets, then this is very expensive. The cost of a rocket and the cost of a fuel truck. Here we economically spent very stupidly, even wastefully.

                If you are looking for a financial trick in everything, you won’t be surprised that over time you will serve the enemy. The French felt that it was cheaper to surrender to Hitler than to fight lol
                Quote: Region 34
                But color revolutions with small arms are very cheap and effective.

                Yes good I do not argue. And in order that this would not happen and there is a state that must protect the sleep of citizens in accordance with the adopted laws, and not chew about liberal “democratic” values wink
                Quote: Region 34
                Today there is a nuclear weapon. But who is fighting them? No. Fighting with small arms (cheap) weapons.

                Nuclear powers are at war with non-nuclear ones, because if a nuclear power starts to fight with a nuclear one, then it will be checked that the bun with raisins is nuclear weapons. And if 20 kiloton bombs showed that there are nuclear weapons, then 500 kiloton, 1-, 2-, 5- megaton not camillefo experience on their own skin And thanks to this, there is the current world order. hi There is a reason, but there is a consequence request
                Quote: Region 34
                Amertsians use aviation. and very effective. Civilians are being bombed, army support is weakening.

                Oh how belay And if we bomb fuel trucks and undermine terrorist financing chains, then we don’t know how to fight? The logic is awesome request wassat
                1. +3
                  28 January 2017 18: 32
                  15.27. Rurikovich! Well, they answered about the debt. Who will give the vassals a debt! wassat Yeah! Sandbox! The USSR had nuclear weapons but was destroyed without it. In Syria, there is a struggle of interests but nuclear weapons are not used. With the French to the point! Yes, and we in the 90s acted like the French. Why bother yourself? We will buy everything abroad! And Medvedev seems to be with all his limbs. The difference in the bombing of fuel trucks and the population is not only in cost. The price of the rocket and the price of a fuel truck, plus the delivery of weapons maintenance (some expenses). A fuel truck pays for itself. The population creates products, means of production and war. Therefore, the destruction of the civilian population, the Western military machine, and is made. How is that logic? hi
          2. +3
            28 January 2017 11: 03
            09.25. Orinovit! In my opinion, they are going to kill not only Russia but also Europe. For this, preparations are underway today. The Arab world has almost finished off. But I think Iran will stand. He survived under sanctions, beats Syria. But in all countries and at all times, the problem of the presence of the Gorbachevs is relevant. And today, Gorbachev’s friends rule in Russia. And they are not going to revive Russia. This is clearly seen in the auto industry. The entire manual on foreign cars. All Moscow on foreign cars. AvtoVAZ under the heel of foreigners. We have already been economically conquered. It remains to count the population. On the outskirts, the population eagerly self-reduces, in Libya too. Similar and prepare for us. There were a lot of patriots in LDNR. Many have already been shot. Che there now, it is not clear. But it probably looks like our future. And it seems war will still be. Processes are taking place not of peaceful construction, but of military-economic destruction.
            1. +2
              28 January 2017 11: 17
              The whole world is going to put to slaughter, and they do not hide it. On the one hand, they promote humanism and democracy (abusive words), on the other hand, they immediately declare that it is necessary to reduce the population to at least a billion. Two-faced sv..l..ch. But the main "enemy" is Russia as always. I completely agree with you, Forecasts for the near future, for the whole world, are the saddest. Even Stalin, for all his sagacity, could not weave, so if in the West they decided that there should be a war, then it will be. True, the scenario is not yet known, but we know that the figures who have been doing this for centuries have dozens of such scenarios for all occasions. And everything is against us.
    2. +1
      29 January 2017 20: 51
      The huge military technical potential relies only on outdated technology. So the use of weapons and this potential is based on victory by quantity. New times require high-quality achievements. And now the question. Who has at least as many close to fundamental, the embodiment of scientific discoveries? There are no discoveries themselves. Therefore, everyone bluffs and plays the dark. Read the same American analysts who declare openly. that over the past sixty years there has been no fundamental scientific discovery. All are based on the foundations laid down in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
  6. 0
    28 January 2017 08: 16
    Well, well, he attacked the sacred cow. The most conservative people, these are generals in their hired posts. Reforms and perestroika are curses for them.
  7. 0
    28 January 2017 08: 17
    We need to build up and build up our military advantage.
    1. +5
      28 January 2017 10: 44
      Quote: Spartanez300
      We need to build up and build up our military advantage.

      We have no advantages ... we have a reviving defense industry that needs to be stimulated and developed. And what Trump says ... of course you can laugh at it, if it’s not a lot with a little mind, but this president is going to invest in the army, reform it and improve it in the future. And what is there to enjoy?
      For me, it is hoped that the Senate, Parliament, and the Pentagon will put all kinds of sticks in the wheels of this reformer, otherwise in the future we will have not only a large and equipped enemy, but also very effective and dangerous in the face of the US Army, which is now experiencing not the best time.
      1. +3
        28 January 2017 11: 02
        Quote: NEXUS
        US Army, which is currently going through hard times.

        And what is this expressed in? This, in my opinion, Russia, is going to send conscripts to Syria because even for a small local conflict "with the Papuans" there are not enough human resources. No?
        1. +2
          28 January 2017 14: 11
          Quote: batial
          This, in my opinion, Russia, is going to send conscripts to Syria because even for a small local conflict "with the Papuans" there are not enough human resources. No?

          Where did you find such information? Or does localization of marijuana work like that? Putin on the threshold indicated that there would be no GROUND OPERATION involving our armed forces in Syria.
          1. +1
            28 January 2017 18: 14
            Quote: NEXUS
            Putin on the threshold indicated that there would be no GROUND OPERATION involving our armed forces in Syria.

            Well, Putin, and the “main contingent” “deduced” several times, and the group was growing. But sappers, military police, special forces, artillerymen ... is this not a ground operation?
            Well, do you yourself think that the adoption of the law on short-term contracts for conscripts was so harsh for what? That's it.
            And what about the "bad times" of the American army?
            1. +2
              28 January 2017 18: 45
              Quote: batial
              Well, Putin, and the “main contingent” “deduced” several times, and the group was growing. But sappers, military police, special forces, artillerymen ... is this not a ground operation?

              Sappers in order to clear up what your proteges in Aleppo left ... or is there any doubt that your administration is engaged in philanthropy in relation to ISIS?
              Military police, this is to stop shooting at Aleppo, because there are a lot of groups, and those who fight against ISIS often do not get along with their kind of allies.
              Gunners? Are they at the forefront?
              As for the special forces, this is the Marine Corps, which is guarded by the same Khmeimim and Tartus.
              Where did you see Russian units at the forefront?
              Quote: batial
              And what about the "bad times" of the American army?

              Well, are you doing well there?
        2. 0
          29 January 2017 15: 06
          Quote: batial
          This, in my opinion, Russia, is going to send conscripts to Syria

          You obviously crowed about conscripts from a big hangover. It's already the second day of the COCK in the yard ... Wake up ...
  8. +1
    28 January 2017 08: 20
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    After reading the word "perestroika" I remembered Gorbachev alone? And how it all ended lol


    And what about "publicity"? Need more "publicity." Well, stir up the anti-alcohol campaign.
  9. +1
    28 January 2017 08: 23
    At the word "reform" the hand reaches for the gun.
  10. +1
    28 January 2017 08: 28
    Thank God, we are not alone in experiencing perestroika. Now they would have more "hunchback."
  11. +2
    28 January 2017 08: 32
    The combat readiness of the American army at such costs is very doubtful. Technological innovations do not particularly strengthen it. Let's see how a retired general strengthens her.
  12. 0
    28 January 2017 08: 42
    Gorbachev to help him .....
    1. 0
      28 January 2017 08: 51
      Liberoid - can rename Trump to Trampocheva? ?? lol
      1. 0
        28 January 2017 09: 08
        Quote: Expelling Liberoids
        Liberoid - can rename Trump to Trampocheva? ?? lol

        I really hope so ...! I want to see how the United States collapses and that the main thing is not one of our soldiers died in this operation ..
        1. +4
          28 January 2017 09: 25
          Quote: Liberoid
          I really hope so ...! I want to see how the United States collapses and that the main thing is not one of our soldiers died in this operation ..

          Meehan, what joy do you have if P. Inda falls apart?
          Are you going to heal better from this? Will they raise their retirement? Housing and communal services will be canceled? Will gas be free?
          Will communism come about?
          You don’t have a damn about it, Meehan!
          1. 0
            28 January 2017 09: 35
            Quote: Stroporez
            Quote: Liberoid
            I really hope so ...! I want to see how the United States collapses and that the main thing is not one of our soldiers died in this operation ..

            Meehan, what joy do you have if P. Inda falls apart?
            Are you going to heal better from this? Will they raise their retirement? Housing and communal services will be canceled? Will gas be free?
            Will communism come about?
            You don’t have a damn about it, Meehan!

            This is the key phrase in your comment ....! Understand at last, we are trying to make a society of stupid consumers of us (or rather, our children and grandchildren) ... And we in Russia are mostly creative and ideological people ... We don’t need bread, give us the goal!
            And as I understand it, if only you could fill your belly, the iPhone of the latest model and a cool car ... (you live in Moscow ..?))))
            1. +3
              28 January 2017 10: 26
              Quote: Liberoid
              . We don’t need bread, give us a goal!

              goal to destroy pinda? Or the goal is to build a fair society at home?
              Feel the difference?
              "The battle for life or life for the sake of battles ....., everything is in our hands"
              Quote: Liberoid
              And as I understand it, if only you could fill your belly, the iPhone of the latest model and a cool car ... (you live in Moscow ..?))))

              Hare fucking piss.

              PS. Can you at least explain to me what happened to the site? And then I have not been in the summer, but then everything has changed ..... Cons have disappeared somewhere and you can’t see the “oldies”. Are you the only one left? what
              1. +2
                28 January 2017 10: 35
                Quote: Stroporez
                Hare fucking piss.

                PS. Can you at least explain to me what happened to the site? And then I have not been in the summer, but then everything has changed ..... Cons have disappeared somewhere and you can’t see the “oldies”. Are you the only one left?

                Sorry, I'm a little angry ... If briefly here everyone is wet! "Comrades" seized the site ... "Drove" nevertheless ..)))) We all praise Israel, etc. Step to the left, step to the right to ban ..! Provoke and shoot in the back .... My element! fellow
                1. 0
                  28 January 2017 10: 48
                  Quote: Liberoid
                  Step to the left, step to the right ban ..! Provoke and shoot in the back .... My element!

                  Yo-pe-re sete what
                  I look at the ratings revised
                  Quote: Liberoid
                  Sorry I'm a little angry.

                  Yes lan to you, bullshit drinks
                  Floodometer, apparently, also works wink
                  Did the Giant utilize thoughts too?
                  1. +1
                    28 January 2017 10: 58
                    Quote: Stroporez
                    Did the Giant utilize thoughts too?

                    Along the way, and for a long time already inaudible .... Then the evil ones were remembered by him! Flunked him ... soldier They’re constantly shooting me .. laughing I’m rushing around like a wolf and snarling .. Here are such things, but I’m not discouraged .. You won’t take a lie!
                    As in the song with Vysotsky exactly ....
                    ]
                    1. +1
                      28 January 2017 11: 14
                      Quote: Liberoid
                      I’m already being constantly shot back .. laughing I’m like a wolf rushing around and snarling .. Here are such things, but I’m not discouraged .. You’ll not take a lie!

                      Hold on, Meehan, you little insistent good
                    2. +3
                      28 January 2017 11: 29
                      Quote: Liberoid
                      Quote: Stroporez
                      Did the Giant utilize thoughts too?
                      Along the way, and for a long time inaudibly ...

                      Do not lie, it was recently. But Atalef seems to be seriously banned.
              2. +5
                28 January 2017 10: 59
                Quote: Stroporez
                . Cons gone somewhere

                We have this ... how is it ... modernization. Comrade Chuvakin, who Mart, along with Fantastic, told everyone fantastic that the minuses should be set morally.
                1. +2
                  28 January 2017 11: 13
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  that the disadvantages must be set morally.

                  AAAA, understandably, modern, tolerance ... wassat
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  We have this ... how is it ... modernization.

                  perestroika, acceleration, glasnost ... somewhere I already heard ento laughing

                  Thanks for the info, comrade. drinks
  13. 0
    28 January 2017 08: 46
    "The undersecretary of defense must monitor the F-35 program to see if it can reduce its cost."
    They attempt on the sacred ....... oh they won’t even live to see the second stage of Trampaperestroika.
  14. +1
    28 January 2017 09: 29
    (Today I intend to sign a decree on large-scale restructuring in our armed forces.)

    Nothing new from Trump. But what about the current theater of absurdity in the behavior of the US Armed Forces says (again retired) CIA officer Robert Steele:
  15. +3
    28 January 2017 10: 01
    Quote: Rurikovich
    And then in case they can still really expose (or provoke) us as an aggressor

    Well, they have a lot of experience in this. Ask people in Europe, and 95% will tell you that Russia attacked both Ukraine and Hitler, and the "peaceful Syrian opposition", and also wants to attack all of Europe and the whole world. He wants so much that he cannot even eat. lol In Japan, few doubt that the Russians dropped atomic bombs on them. And so on all over the world. Ask, for example, in Brazil, and you will be told Western stories about the "evil" Russians. So that the "aggressor" from Russia had already been done in advance, it is enough to read the Western press. Whatever they do in the west, in the global information space (and you probably know who controls it), in any case, Russia will always be “to blame”.
  16. 0
    28 January 2017 11: 13
    "Trump announced the beginning of" large-scale restructuring "of the American army"

    At the helm of the United States stood an experienced captain "submariner", who knows the undercurrents of American politics, economics and finance, who knows that if you don’t throw a fat piece of US financial sharks, not only your pants, but your throat will be torn. Moreover, the buck, in the first place, as a world currency, is based on American bayonets and bases scattered around the world.
    For now, as always ...
  17. 0
    28 January 2017 11: 27
    Oh, is perestroika starting? But what about those lobbyists who defend Wishlist defense?
    Here, without this, well, just nothing, otherwise all Trump's attempts will die in Congress.
  18. +1
    28 January 2017 12: 00
    Quote: NEXUS
    in the face of the US Army, which is currently going through hard times.
    We wish we had such bad times. Build another heavy nuclear carrier and the second Zumwalt, another Arly Burke took part in the fleet recently, riveted more than 100 F-35 in a short time. Beauty, what.
  19. 0
    28 January 2017 12: 07
    Some congressmen miss money. McCain is indignant.
  20. +1
    28 January 2017 12: 29
    Congratulations!
    America is finally thinking about its Army!
    Maybe it’s really possible to do something with this cinema army?
  21. +2
    28 January 2017 16: 09
    Quote: Stroporez

    Meehan, what joy do you have if P. Inda falls apart?

    -------------------------------------------
    Pin-da has long since collapsed, high-speed unmanned trains in China, super bridges in China, super-industry in China. And in the US, only super-virtual reality, super-banks and super-consumption. There is also a super-army, which cannot protect from anything from anyone, and can only significantly destroy a small country. And they will increase their pensions, because along with Pin-do, the cult of super-consumption will go away and the worthlessness of capitalism will come to light, together with our White Guard authorities.
    1. +2
      28 January 2017 22: 07
      Excuse me, where are they collecting all hundreds of Boeing airliners per year, all helicopters, ships?
      Cars, trucks, space rockets?
      Everything in the United States. And now Trump even demands that consumer electronics be returned to his native land.
  22. +1
    28 January 2017 23: 20
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Excuse me, where are they collecting all hundreds of Boeing airliners per year, all helicopters, ships?

    --------------------
    Grandmother remembered when she was a girl. laughing It sounds something like before "But we make rockets, block the Yenisei, and also in the field of ballet, sorry, Hollywood, we are ahead of the rest."
  23. +1
    29 January 2017 01: 12
    If Trump fulfills at least half of his promises, remains at his post for life, unfortunately, he is not Michal Srgeich.
  24. +1
    29 January 2017 01: 12
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Everything in the United States. And now Trump even demands that consumer electronics be returned to his native land.

    --------------------------------------------
    Some graphics to you in comments
    1. +1
      29 January 2017 02: 23
      And this is a little bit of information for thought - Russia's GDP is 3,437 trillion dollars.
      Texas shat GDP - $ 1,414 trillion
      California State GDP -2,144 trillion dollars
      This is because they are highlighted in red on your map tongue
      Py Sy, all Russian propaganda is based on such distortions. Glory to Kiselev !! Glory to Solovyov !!! wink
  25. 0
    29 January 2017 15: 01
    Quote: Region 34
    Here Germany won’t be able to return its gold from storage in the USA, and you are talking about debts.


    A piece has already returned!
  26. 0
    29 January 2017 20: 11
    Trump takes on everything that was done with a black man, hits all painful places, I worry about his safety.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"