Russia gave the Syrian opposition a draft of the new constitution of Syria

17
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov handed over proposals for amending the Syrian constitution to representatives of the so-called Syrian opposition. We are talking about those representatives of the armed groups who led the negotiation process in the capital of Kazakhstan, Astana. Receipt of Russian documents from the proposal regarding the new constitution was confirmed by the representative of the Syrian delegation Kadri Jamil. Recall that after the talks in Astana, the "opposition" Syrian delegation was invited to Moscow.

Russia gave the Syrian opposition a draft of the new constitution of Syria


Jamil:
We received from Lavrov Russian proposals on the Syrian Constitution.


It should be noted that Russia is trying to put together the proposals of all interested parties, so that in the end Syria will be able to approve the constitution created on the basis of a comprehensive consensus of the parties to the conflict.

Recall that earlier in the press there was information that Russia took the initiative to consolidate a multiparty system in the new Syrian constitution, as well as removing the word "Arab" from the name of the republic (for reference: officially at the moment - the Syrian Arab Republic). The possible change of name is argued by the fact that not only Arabs live in Syria, but also, for example, several million Kurds. The Kurdish forces, by the way, have already approved the Russian proposal.

They have already joked about it in social networks: “Russia is going to remove the word“ Arab ”from the name of Syria and pass it on to Germany or France.”

It should be added that the possibility of creating a full-fledged Kurdish autonomy in Syria is now being considered, given that Syria will remain a unitary state.
  • ИноСМИ
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    27 January 2017 13: 01
    Well, given what kind of out in Syria there was a relation not of the Alawites, in particular to the Kurds, who were forbidden to even vote, then the initiative is good.
    1. +6
      27 January 2017 13: 24
      They conveyed it, but not the fact that all parties will agree ...
      1. +5
        27 January 2017 13: 25
        Let's see what happens.
      2. +1
        27 January 2017 13: 31
        Starting with something is necessary, these are just suggestions.
    2. +2
      27 January 2017 13: 28
      Russia would have corrected its Constitution, written by the Americans. Why stick your nose where the dog "x ... east" does not stick? laughing Our “Barshchevskys” could not win a single international court, but there too!
  2. +1
    27 January 2017 13: 12
    Well, one word was seized and the country that was disappeared. Syrian Arab Republic has fallen, long live the Syrian Republic
    1. 0
      27 January 2017 13: 40
      Well, yes, the "Syrian, not only the Arab Republic", and not only the Syrian ... Autonomies are unlikely to be satisfied with this status in the future, they will go "maidans of indefinability". If all the nuances are not immediately harshly agreed upon, and this is currently something that is not very emphasized, it is unlikely that the initiative of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs will turn out to be a good deed for Syria in the future, the country will collapse already in its legalized status.
      1. +1
        27 January 2017 14: 09
        Ger both Per se. We’ll wait and see, for some impatient people said: “Kuzya” will be taken out by Assad and others.
        1. 0
          27 January 2017 15: 34
          I didn’t quite understand your passage about “Ger with both Per se”, I don’t want to take this for rudeness, but to be an optimist or a monarchist, it’s up to you to express your opinion in my commentary. I personally did not say anything about Kuzyu and Assad, and I really hope that Assad will still live for a long time for the benefit of Syria.
      2. +1
        27 January 2017 14: 30
        Quote: Per se.
        go "maidan nezalezhnosti". If all the nuances are not immediately harshly agreed upon, and this is currently something that is not very emphasized, it is unlikely that the initiative of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs will turn out to be a good deed for Syria in the future, the country will fall apart in an authorized status.
        Mokhet, you are right, but I don’t think so. A country that survived the war is unlikely to allow a "maidan". Too expensive Syria it cost. They will begin to build now, and not arrange revolutions. Tired of Syria from the war
        1. 0
          27 January 2017 15: 28
          Quote: Wend
          The country that survived the war
          Syria is tired, but there are those who are not tired at all and profit from the war. On top of that, it's not about now, it's about after. The whole question is how much time should pass before this “after” in the Middle East. Something doesn’t look very much like the country will be allowed to live in peace, build peace and prosperity, especially when it is constitutionally laid down that Syria is not only an Arab republic, such as Egypt and many other countries of the region.
  3. +1
    27 January 2017 13: 16
    Quote: Kurdish forces, by the way, have already approved the Russian proposal. Well, that’s. This is a powerful help in the fight against Turkey. With the formation of autonomy, the idea of ​​the Ottoman Empire will finally fall. I think about the Turkish forces will rest until the end. And where to get to. You did not have to go into Syria And the initiative is not on their side.
  4. 0
    27 January 2017 15: 07
    Something I did not understand ... "Russian proposals for the Syrian Constitution"?!?!?! And what kind of proposals do we have on THEIR Constitution? What do we climb into THEIR Constitution? Let them write, discuss and accept it themselves, so that later they don’t blame the bad Russians!
    1. +1
      27 January 2017 16: 02
      Quote: senima56
      Let them write, discuss and accept it themselves, so that later they don’t blame the bad Russians!

      They’ve already fallen. The traitor Assad is giving the lands to KURDAM with the Russians. That's how many people in the Arab segment react. And there are many opponents among the Alevites. After all, Kurds unanimously hate everything in the East. Starting from Turkey ending in Kyrgyzstan. When I first found out about it, I laughed for a very long time ))) Since the description and reasons for not love almost coincided with what I heard from the Turks, Arabs and other nations.

      I understand here that Russia was simply confronted with a fact on the part of the United States — it was understandable from the moment American bases appeared there. The only way to withdraw them, some kind of concession from the Russian Federation, was to see whether or not there was a moment for bargaining. .And Syrian Kurdistan will be the same reality as Iraqi.
  5. +1
    27 January 2017 15: 22
    Russia gave the Syrian opposition a draft of the new constitution of Syria

    I hope to live up to the time when Russia will write the Constitution for itself. And not American advisers to Chubais, as it was in 1993.
  6. +1
    27 January 2017 19: 19
    still our codes (housing, civil, criminal, etc.) to translate into Arabic. so as not to relax.
  7. 0
    28 January 2017 21: 15
    Quote: siberalt
    Russia would have corrected its Constitution, written by the Americans. Why stick your nose where the dog "x ... east" does not stick?

    Firstly, can you reasonably state your claims to the current Constitution of the Russian Federation?
    Secondly, our proposal for the Constitution of the SAR is a continuation of our efforts to stabilize the country and eliminate the possibility of turning it into a bridgehead for training gangs for action against Russia, for stabilizing the region as a whole.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"