Military Review

Sanctions against Concern East Kazakhstan Almaz-Antey

23
The European Court of Justice of General Jurisdiction has upheld the sanctions imposed by the Council of the European Union on the EKM Almaz-Antey concern. The decision of the tribunal states that "the decision of the EU Council to freeze the assets of the concern from March 2015 of the year to September 2016 of the year is legal."


The general director of the company, Yan Novikov, said in this connection:

We consider today's decision of the European Court to be political and not based on a legal assessment of the circumstances of the case. "The pursuit of the concern by European justice is connected with the crash of Malaysian Airlines 17 July 2014 year in the sky over Ukraine. 31 July 2014, the company was blacklisted, which envisaged the freezing of all assets of the person involved.The evidence was the "messages in social networks" and "numerous publications in the media" about the presence in the east of Ukraine air defense missile complex in "Beech". According to Y. Novikov, "in September 2016, the EU Council at the hearing before the Court of Justice general jurisdiction recognized that communication concern" Almaz-Antey "with the collapse of the Malaysian Boeing has not been established. The more paradoxical is today's decision on our suit.




Appeal against this decision, the concern is not going to.

We do not plan to file an appeal, as today it has already been announced that the decision of the European Court is politicized and, accordingly, we do not believe in the European Court. In this regard, we believe that there is no reason to expect changes in the court’s approach to our appeal if it is submitted, and consequently, there is no sense in the further costs of unpromising litigation in conditions where it is impossible to count on a decision that lies within the legal field

- explained in the press service of the enterprise.
23 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Asadullah
    Asadullah 26 January 2017 11: 19
    +1
    We do not plan to file an appeal, as today it has already been announced that the decision of the European Court is politicized and, accordingly, we do not believe in the European Court. In this regard, we believe that there is no reason to expect changes in the court’s approach to our appeal if it is submitted, and consequently, there is no sense in the further costs of unpromising litigation in conditions where it is impossible to count on a decision that lies within the legal field


    The decision is not even politicized, the decision is an element of hostilities. One of the attempts to weaken Russia's defense capabilities in the air defense segment. We must take reciprocal steps.
    1. The black
      The black 26 January 2017 11: 25
      +2
      Washington said to u: "It is necessary!" - the EU court replied: "Yes!" laughing
    2. Skeptic Self-Taught
      Skeptic Self-Taught 26 January 2017 11: 26
      +1
      Protectionism is so different - for all tastes and colors.
      Well, and not to start technological breakthroughs - too ...
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 26 January 2017 11: 26
      +9
      Quote: Asadullah
      The decision is not even politicized, the decision is an element of hostilities. One of the attempts to weaken Russia's defense capabilities in the air defense segment. We must take reciprocal steps.

      I agree with you, dear Asadullah! hi The only question is What kind of response will they take? And will there be enough will to take these actions by our leadership? Respectfully, Colleague. hi
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 26 January 2017 11: 30
        +5
        I strongly doubt something in return steps ... Although, what the hell is not joking ... We will see.
      2. Asadullah
        Asadullah 26 January 2017 11: 43
        +5
        The only question is What kind of response will they take?


        Yes, Komrad, specially provoked this question. smile The easiest way to ban something, or to spoil the air with a speech from the Duma, and in the same way. I honestly don’t know. But in a war, as in a war, personally, he himself would have gone by carefully preparing an action on the economic front in a few moves to strike at the weakest point. A simple solution is not possible here.
        1. tol100v
          tol100v 27 January 2017 15: 27
          0
          Quote: Asadullah
          he would go by carefully preparing the action on the economic front in a few moves, which would hit the weakest point. A simple solution is not possible here.

          They only understand this: when they are beaten severely in the pocket and very painful in the lying face! Hot should not be done. The dish is wrong ...
    4. KVIRTU
      KVIRTU 26 January 2017 11: 36
      +2
      Element VD - yes. But in this case, it is not so much against Russia as:
      "Despite the sanctions, we continue to work. We are currently executing 26 long-term contracts from nine countries for a total of more than $ 300 million. Another 33 contracts from 13 states worth more than $ 500 million are under study, "the deputy head of the concern added.
      Accounts in Europe for work on these contracts were blocked, and some amounts were hanging there. Not deadly.
      1. Polite Moose
        Polite Moose 26 January 2017 12: 47
        +3
        Quote: KVIRTU
        Accounts in Europe for work on these contracts were blocked, and some amounts were hanging there. Not deadly.

        Quote: Asadullah
        A simple solution is not possible here.

        Promotion from the concern "Almaz-Antey"! To the first 10 customers in 2017 or when paying in cash - 10% discount on finished products.
    5. MPK105
      MPK105 26 January 2017 12: 05
      +4
      It’s necessary, only who will take these steps, our government? Do you really believe in this?
      1. Asadullah
        Asadullah 26 January 2017 12: 35
        +1
        It’s necessary, only who will take these steps, our government? Do you really believe in this?


        The question is not faith. The question of expediency. I’m not sure that my understanding of expediency in this case is true. The second point is not a question for the government. Question to certain services. I doubt that they will give you any answer. laughing In this case, one can only reflect on what can be done. Do you have any thoughts?
        1. MPK105
          MPK105 26 January 2017 12: 55
          +5
          Well, the appeal is meaningless, here the factory argued clearly ... My considerations will not answer reality, but, nevertheless, the state can actively fight for factories, citizens on the world stage ... Although this, I agree, "smiles" request Perplexed with the answer hi
    6. leshiy076
      leshiy076 26 January 2017 13: 06
      0
      How did Almaz-Antey’s assets end up where someone could take and freeze them?
  2. CYBERNINJA
    CYBERNINJA 26 January 2017 11: 27
    0
    As far as I know, Almaz-Antey is a large industrial supplier of units ...
    I wonder how foreign customers will react when "AA" will write off everything to force majeure for disruption of supply, especially if everything is paid to the front?
  3. Wildfox
    Wildfox 26 January 2017 11: 42
    0
    Quote: CYBERNINDJA
    As far as I know, Almaz-Antey is a large industrial supplier of units ...
    I wonder how foreign customers will react when "AA" will write off everything to force majeure for disruption of supply, especially if everything is paid to the front?

    No way! There all risks are insured. This is precisely what is being done to push AA out of the markets. Or do you think there businessmen care about those who died on board the Boeing? Wait! Squeeze sales insolently and all.
  4. Stinger
    Stinger 26 January 2017 11: 46
    0
    And it’s not cool to keep the assets of these freaks. The EU does not hold anything for us. just robbing in silence. It's time for them to put a straw in one place.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 26 January 2017 12: 14
      0
      In today's situation, when at any time any company (group) can be sanctioned, are there really those who hold assets in Western banks? For some reason, I’m not talking about US bonds purchased by us.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. askort154
    askort154 26 January 2017 12: 30
    +1
    Closer is the moment of announcement - who shot down the Boeing. One witness (Obama) left, the second in line (Poroshenko), and the main developer, the CIA, is now in disgrace at Trump. The commission has been pulling for three years, waiting for the "go-ahead".
  7. Charond
    Charond 26 January 2017 12: 45
    +1
    Russia is time to introduce retaliatory sanctions against NATO countries. Without the products of the NATO auto and aircraft industry, the Russian Federation will do well.
  8. Bradley
    Bradley 26 January 2017 13: 08
    0
    Sanctions against Concern East Kazakhstan Almaz-Antey

    And like someone doubted, dy?

    The concern is not going to appeal the decision. "We do not plan to file an appeal, since today it was already stated that the decision of the European Court politicized and accordingly we don't believe To the European court.

    Funny ...
    No, seriously, talk about that decision "politicized"when it is so obvious. As if in our world it happens differently.
    We don’t have to believe them (as they do to us), everyone has their own truth, this is the whole comic of the quote.
    They can, we cannot. That is the difference!
    I hope that they will not come up with our “retaliatory sanctions,” because they will come up with what we will suffer as always.
    After all, nothing will stop them, for example, closing online purchases through computeruniverseto show these Europeans that we can!
    And in computeruniverse they are bought well, since prices are much lower there than in Russia, even taking into account delivery.
  9. Cat man null
    Cat man null 26 January 2017 13: 39
    +1
    Damn ... yesterday, exactly about the same article was on IN ...

  10. midshipman
    midshipman 26 January 2017 14: 28
    +1
    I think that it is necessary to wait for sanctions against enterprises that produce Kalashnikov assault rifles. These are the PRC, the Russian Federation, India, Vietnam and, as I recall, 35 countries. After all, all the naked Papuans run with this machine. I have the honor.
  11. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 28 January 2017 08: 06
    0
    Russia in this case is powerless to do something in return. Replace apples from Poland with "Belarusian"?
    They can’t even make champignons in Russia, they still sell either Chinese or Dutch - here, for example, all the inscriptions are written in the pseudo-Old Russian type “Wonderful Forest”. And the manufacturer: Lutece B / V / Handelstraat 8? 5961 PV Horst, The Netherlands ...
    And Almazu Antei without Western machines and accessories ... These are not Dutch champignons or palm oil.