Jacob Kedmi: NATO will cease to exist within a year

January 26 2017 19

The former head of the Israeli special service "Nativ" Jacob Kedmi about the future of NATO.

19 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

svp67

0

26 January 2017 10: 21

Jacob Kedmi: NATO will cease to exist within a year
The main thing is that it brings Russia. Even if NATO disintegrates, then "a holy place is never empty", almost immediately a Common European Army will appear .... "
1. Andrey Yuryevich
  
  0
  
  26 January 2017 10: 35
  
  Quote: svp67
  Even if NATO breaks up
  
  Ukrainians with pshekami will not survive ... and the Baltics, right away in the loop ...
  1. Observer2014
    
    +2
    
    26 January 2017 15: 20
    
    Andrey Yuryevich
    Ukrainians with pshekami will not survive ... and the Baltics, right away in the loop ...
    Or they will look for expired sprats
2. den.perfiljew
  
  0
  
  26 January 2017 10: 57
  
  Undoubtedly there will be attempts to create something like this, but this is not the same, so the chickens laugh)))
3. Lelek
  
  +2
  
  26 January 2017 11: 05
  
  Quote: svp67
  Even if NATO breaks up
  
  Hey.
  IMHO, NATO will not break up, but it will undergo some transformations. NATO is a US-created military instrument of confrontation between the USSR and then Russia, and America and its comrades will not refuse it - too much money has been invested in it, and “business” without profit is not American. But what will be the “upgrades” of this tool, we will see in the near future, it is unlikely that Russia will benefit from this.
  1. Terminolol
    
    0
    
    26 January 2017 12: 48
    
    While the printing press is operating, the United States will keep NATO afloat, even with the help of the Baltic hangers-on. Leave Germany and France from NATO, nothing will change.
  2. Andrew 1
    
    0
    
    26 January 2017 16: 47
    
    "NATO is a US-created military tool to confront the USSR, and then Russia, and America and its comrades will not refuse it - too much money has been invested in it, and" business "without profit is not American."
    
    In principle, I agree with all that has been said.
    But I’m interested in the “profit” ... please tell me what the profit from the existence of NATO can be expressed in.
    1. Lelek
      
      0
      
      26 January 2017 17: 50
      
      Quote: Andrey 1
      But I’m interested in the “profit” ... please tell me what the profit from the existence of NATO can be expressed in.
      
      How is this what? And the arms trade and the related military-industrial complex of the USA, and the “obstacle course” on the paths of Russian business in Europe (and not only in Europe), but the assertion of its “exclusiveness”, and hence permissiveness in resolving selfish issues. All this is mani-mani and not just mani, but billions of green bills from the US printing press.
4. iouris
  
  0
  
  26 January 2017 18: 06
  
  Quote: svp67
  Immediately, the main thing is that it bears Russia.
  
  It is more important that some citizens of the Russian Federation, who separately joined NATO and the EU, or, remaining in place, spiritually emigrated to the United States, "bear".
5. myobius59
  
  0
  
  2 May 2017 21: 59
  
  Not if the Americans don’t finance the European allies, they themselves will put big and fat on this whole army. They are used to living in chocolate, and they won’t and don’t (and why?) Unfasten large grandmothers for defense. necessary, it’s better they feed and drink all immigrants.
6. edge
  
  0
  
  April 27 2018 06: 23
  
  Quote: svp67
  Almost immediately the Pan-European Army will appear .... "
  
  burdened pan-European army (ped .... stov)
Taygerus

0

26 January 2017 10: 53

Well, you can’t nightmare Russophobes like that, they’ll clog the sewer
Vitalson

0

26 January 2017 11: 16

pensioner burns.
Stas57

+2

26 January 2017 12: 58

Jacob Kedmi: NATO in the form in which we know him cease to exist during the year, the organization will remain

did you learn the headlines from life or renti?
1536

+1

26 January 2017 13: 10

In my opinion, a sense of common sense has changed this time to an outstanding expert.
Or, rather, a new "Strange War" (Phoney War) against Russia.
1. Andrew 1
  
  0
  
  26 January 2017 16: 50
  
  Sometimes it seems to me that he says what people want to hear! The show is the show.
pepel79

0

26 January 2017 16: 57

Yasha, you just don’t tell them about it, otherwise they will break up in vain ...
iouris

0

26 January 2017 18: 07

Is there life without NATO, is there life without NATO - science does not know this.
Andrew 1

0

26 January 2017 20: 06

Quote: Lelek
Quote: Andrey 1
But I’m interested in the “profit” ... please tell me what the profit from the existence of NATO can be expressed in.

How is this what? And the arms trade and the related military-industrial complex of the USA, and the “obstacle course” on the paths of Russian business in Europe (and not only in Europe), but the assertion of its “exclusiveness”, and hence permissiveness in resolving selfish issues. All this is mani-mani and not just mani, but billions of green bills from the US printing press.

Again I agree with you! But all this can be attributed to the benefits of the military-industrial complex ... Yes, they will receive a state order, yes, they will be financed from the budget, yes, they will receive a decent profit ...
But!
Tanks and guns, planes and ships ... is it an asset or a liability?
What, ultimately, should be profitable?
Please do not forget that all this “iron” for some reason very quickly becomes obsolete, with the modern development of technologies ...
If simple.
After the Second World War, a huge amount of “iron” was produced in the USSR and the USA, and where is it now?
Well, if you yourself write about the "machine" .... then I really do not understand what you mean the designated "profit"! ;-)

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"