Russian reception of tank combat - ram attack

33
Russian reception of tank combat - ram attack

Russia was the birthplace of not only air, but tank ram. And it was actively used during the Great Patriotic War. First in the world tank the ram was made by Simon Kuzmich Osadchy (1904 - November 13, 1936), during the years of the Spanish Civil War 1936 — 1939.

Osadchy was drafted into the Red Army in 1926, then trained in an armored school. In Spain, he commanded a tank platoon, fought on a light T-26 tank. October 29 1936, the first tank battle in the world against tanks took place. In the battle near the settlement of Sesenia (30 km south of Madrid), Soviet tanks came together - companies under the command of captain P. Arman and Italian Ansaldo light tanks (they were armed with 2 8-mm paired machine guns before modernization). Soviet tankers won a landslide victory by destroying several enemy tanks. In this battle, the crew of Osadchego, made the world's first tank ram, the T-26 pushed into the gorge the Italian tank Ansaldo. The raid of the Soviet tankers was very successful, they destroyed and scattered up to two battalions of infantry and two cavalry squadrons, destroyed 12 guns, two or three dozen vehicles, and destroyed the enemy’s tank unit on the same day. For this battle, tankers Arman, Pogodin, Osadchy received the first titles of Hero of the Soviet Union for their feats of arms (December 31 of 1936). Osadchy did not live to World War II - in a battle 3 November 1936, his tank destroyed two artillery batteries and six machine-gun points. But a shell hit the tank, an explosion blew off both of his legs, on November 13 he died in the hospital.

The ram was a tactical device when, using its mobility and armor, the tanks broke into enemy firing positions, rammed artillery guns, machine-gun points, various enemy vehicles. As well as incapacitating enemy tanks by collision, enemy armored vehicles were usually overturned or immobilized (an enemy tank, the SPG could lose a caterpillar). In addition, tank crews could ram street barricades or brick walls of buildings, crush planes. The success of the ram was largely dependent on the training of the crew, his skill. A big role in it was played by the fighting spirit of the tankers, their willingness to die, but to complete the task. In total, during the Great Patriotic War, our tank crews made rams up to 160.

Especially many rams were committed in 1943 year. For example, in a battle in Prokhorovka 12 on July 1943 of the year (one of the famous episodes of the Battle of Kursk), Soviet tank crews performed more 20 tank rams, and in the 50 days of the Kursk battle more than 50. Thrusters destroyed not only the light and medium armored vehicles of the enemy, but also happened, and heavy "Tigers". When struck by the hull, the tanks failed, the German armored vehicles were torn caterpillars, armor burst, leading and support rollers were deformed. Straight rams were committed, as a rule, in special cases, when the ammunition ran out, the gun was damaged, and the battle continued. Sometimes they were attacked on a sudden encounter with enemy vehicles on the streets of cities and towns, as well as in a close tank battle, when tanks broke into the battle formations of the enemy. They tried to ram into the side of the tank, which could lead to the overturning of the enemy machine. It happened that tanks exploded due to the detonation of ammunition, or because of the ignition of fuel spilled from damaged tanks.

One of the first rams of the Great Patriotic War was made by Pavel Danilovich Gutz (28 of September 1919 of the year - 5 of May of 2008 of the year). He was born in a peasant family, by the time the Great Patriotic War began, he graduated with honors from the 2-e Saratov Heavy Tank School. Pavel Gutz was sent to the city of Lviv (Kiev Special Military District). In mid-June 1941, the young lieutenant Gudz arrived in the 63 tank regiment of the 32 tank division (commanded by Colonel Efim Pushkin) of the 4 mechanized corps (commander Major General Andrei Vlasov) as part of the 6 army.

On Saturday, 21 June 1941, the platoon commander, Lieutenant Pavel Hutz took over duty on the part. On the morning of June 22, the regiment tankers were alerted. The control platoon (five KV-1 heavy tanks, two T-34 medium tanks and two BA-10 armored vehicles), commanded by Hutz, headed the regimental column towards the western border in the Kristopol area. The first to meet the vanguard of the Nazis, Hutz led a platoon to attack and destroyed the enemy cannon. By 12 hours of the day, Lieutenant Gudzia’s connection had already destroyed five German tanks, three armored personnel carriers and several vehicles.

On the same day, the commander KV-1 Gudzya in 8 km from Yavorovo under the control of the driver Galkin (in the past he was a test driver of tanks in the Leningrad Kirov plant) struck a sliding blow into the steering wheel of an enemy medium tank T - III, knocked him Caterpillar and then a strong blow dropped into a ditch. It is believed that this was the first tank ram not only in the division, but also in the entire Red Army. In addition, his tank rammed an enemy armored personnel carrier.

In addition, there is evidence that tank tankers of the 5 Panzer Division (commander Colonel Fedor Fedorov) used tank rams on the first day. This tank division entered the 3-th mechanized corps, its commander was Major General of the tank forces Alexei Kurkin, 11-th army of the Baltic Special Military District and was stationed in the Lithuanian city of Alytus. The 5 Tank Division was armed with mostly BT-7 and T-26 light tanks and T-28 medium tanks, armored cars and a number of new T-34 medium tanks. A fierce battle took place on the banks of the Neman River. During one of the fights, several Russian cars with a flank attack destroyed half a dozen German tanks, some of them were rammed and thrown into a ditch.

Gutz became famous not only the first (or one of the first) tank rams in the Great Patriotic War, but also a unique battle, when his crew destroyed ten enemy tanks in one battle. After the November 7 parade of 1941, his tank battalion participated in fierce battles in the Rokossovsky 16 Army band. By the beginning of December 1941, after almost a month of fierce battles, only one KV-89 tank and several light tanks remained in the 1-th separate tank battalion of Gudz. The enemy - part of the German 10 Panzer Division, occupied the village near Moscow Nefed'evo in 35 km from Moscow. The commander of a tank battalion, captain Konstantin Khorin, invited Gudz’s chief of staff and assigned him the task of knocking the enemy out of the village.


Lieutenant P. D. Gudz in his KV-1 tank is moving from Red Square after participating in the November 7 Military Parade of the 1941 of the year.

One tank supported the attack of the Soviet infantry, taking the battle with the enemy's 18 tanks. During the fierce battle, the Soviet tankers not only knocked down and destroyed the enemy's 10 vehicles, but also supported the advance of infantry units, the Klim Voroshilov tank crushed the tracks and shot German infantry that could not withstand the onslaught. On the battlefield battle left until 400 Germans. When the battle was over, 29 dented dents from enemy shells on the heroic tank.

The tanker ace brilliantly served his homeland in the future. In the battles for Stalingrad was seriously wounded (two bullet wounds and 6 shatters in the chest). But after the hospital returned to the front. In Zaporozhye in the Dneproges region, the Gudzya tank was shot down. Two crew members of the KV died, and the commander was seriously wounded. Gudzia had damaged her left clavicle and her left hand. Pavel Danilovich cut off the remnants of the brush with a knife, from an already padded tank, destroyed two German heavy tanks "Tigr". After a new hit in the HF, Hudz, who lost consciousness, pulled a driver out of the tank. After treatment, Gutz, having received a prosthetic arm, again voluntarily returned to the front. After the war he became a brilliant teacher, professor, doctor of military sciences, he rose to the rank of colonel general of tank forces.

Hero of the Soviet Union, Captain Alexei Petrovich Bosov (21.03.1910 - 18.11.1941). In 1932, he graduated from the workers' faculty at the Leningrad Institute of Railway Engineers. Then, on a party mobilization, a young man was sent to study at the Ulyanovsk armored school named after V. I. Lenin. Having finished it, Alexey received the rank of middle commander and served in the Trans-Baikal Military District. He participated in the battles at Halkin Gol. On August 27, during a battle in the valley of the Haylastin-Gol River (a tributary of the Khalkhin-Gol), his company inflicted a flank attack on the Japanese force. In a fleeting cruel battle, the Soviet tank crews of Bosova destroyed guns, machine guns by throwing hand grenades through the hatches of the machines: 10 artillery guns and 220 soldiers and officers of the enemy, 30 people were captured. For the Khalkhingol offensive, Bosov received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union and the Order of Lenin.

The Great Patriotic War found Captain Alexei Bosov studying at the Military Academy of Armored Forces. But when the Germans approached Moscow, the brave tankman asked for the front. The captain became the company commander in the battalion of heavy KV tanks, he was sent to Volokolamsk, on this section of the Western Front were some of the most brutal battles for Moscow. Together with the soldiers of the legendary Panfilov Division, a separate tank battalion beat off the furious attacks of the Nazis. 18 November 1941, in the area of ​​the village of Small Towns, his company was assigned to dislodge the enemy from the village of Denkovo. Against 5 KV 12 German tanks were abandoned, the oncoming battle began. In the course of this battle, the Bosova KV destroyed 8 enemy tanks - 4 of them were rammed. In addition, the Soviet tank crews destroyed an enemy infantry company, and Bosova's tank was crushed by a German reconnaissance aircraft, which was taxiing for takeoff. Unfortunately, the death found on this day and the hero, his crew died.

Soviet tankers used rams against enemy planes on the ground. 11 January 1944 of the 49 tank tank brigade crushed 17 enemy aircraft at the airport of the Polish city of Lübeck. 28 March 1944, tank crews of the 64 Guards Tank Brigade at the airport of Chernivtsi city, fired on cannons and machine guns and attacked the enemy’s 30 aircraft. 17 January 1945, a group of tanks under the command of I. Kravchenko from the 47 Guards Tank Brigade with rams and tank fire eliminated 20 airplanes at the airfield near the Polish city of Sochaczew.

The crew of the guard lieutenant Dmitry Yevlampievich Komarov (08.11.1922 - 05.09.1944) made a ram of an armored train (!). Komarov was born into a peasant family, before the war he worked as an accountant on the railway. With the beginning of the war drafted into the army and was trained in the Blagoveshchensk tank school. In April, 1943 was sent to the front as commander of the medium tank T-34.

In the summer of 1944, he participated, as part of the 15 of the Guards Tank Brigade of the 1 of the Guards Tank Don Corps of the 1 of the Belarusian Front, in Operation Bagration. 25 June 1944, his team received the task to cut the railway Luninets - Bobruisk and beat off the station of Black Brody.

Komarov's tank was the first to burst into a populated area, breaking through the fire of 10 and German Artsturm self-propelled artillery launchers (armed with the Stun III 75-mm cannon). At that moment, a German armored train opened fire on Soviet tanks, and the return fire could not harm him. Komarov's tank was set on fire, and the commander himself was wounded, but the tank was on the move. Then Komarov and tank mechanic Mikhail Bukhtuev decided to ram the enemy's armored train. At maximum speed, the tank, engulfed in fire, crashed into an armored train, two armored platforms were shot down and overturned, the train stopped. Inspired by the comrade's feat, the brigade’s tanks liberated the station. When struck, the driver Bukhtuyev died, the wounded Komarov was able to get out and firing from the Germans, hid in the forest. Scouts found him a few days later.

The brave tanker did not live up to the Victory. 5 September 1944 of the year in a fierce night battle for a bridgehead on the west bank of the river Narev Dmitry Komarov was killed. September 26 1944 was awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union (posthumously).


Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    3 February 2012 08: 55
    In the bottom picture, the T-34-76 hit the T-60 ...
    1. grizzlir
      0
      3 February 2012 09: 18
      Very similar to that.
    2. +1
      3 February 2012 09: 49
      And next to like a Wehrmacht soldier. Although it is quite possible - the Germans fought on captured Soviet tanks.
      1. 0
        3 February 2012 09: 59
        Perhaps this is a technique thrown by our MK when they were left without fuel. The T-34 destroyed the T-60, and then it was set on fire. Although the hole in the tower is also visible.
        1. grizzlir
          +2
          3 February 2012 11: 00
          In the heat of battle, wherever you fly in. And where do you observe holes in the tower, on the site of the side observation tower slit? It looks a little like holes, like the tank was burning. Most likely, in the heat of battle, the tank flew into a standing sixteen and got stuck corny or damaged the chassis. In war, this does not happen.
          1. 0
            3 February 2012 14: 19
            I'm talking about this hole.
            1. grizzlir
              +3
              3 February 2012 14: 32
              Look at the photo above, the view of the T-34 tower from the starboard side. You will still consider the hole for shooting from personal weapons to be a hole
              ?
              1. +3
                3 February 2012 21: 25
                Thanks for the comment. what
                1. grizzlir
                  0
                  3 February 2012 22: 59
                  I apologize if I expressed myself somewhat rudely in komenta. Live and learn, honestly only today I learned that on the T-34-85 from the starboard side of the tower there was a viewing gap for the loader.
              2. schta
                0
                6 February 2012 15: 25
                Yes, but the photo shows the pre-war T-34-76 with the L-11 gun, and in the diagram there is a typical tower from the T-34-85 tank.
                Nevertheless, the "hole for the gun", which seemed to be a hole, was somehow present.
  2. grizzlir
    +7
    3 February 2012 09: 18
    I read and heard a lot about tank rams committed in WWII. It’s one thing to ram a T-3 or T-4 KV and another to ram a TIGER on a T-34. A tank with more mass and better armor is in a better situation. with iron nerves to the crew and, first of all, to the mechanic driver. Now it comes to my mind what will happen if we push our T-90 into the frontal ABRAMS. The armor of the tanks is about the same, but the ABRAMS has a larger mass.
    1. SIA
      SIA
      +3
      3 February 2012 11: 45
      The larger the cabinet, the louder it falls. This is me about Abrams.
    2. Hans grohman
      +2
      3 February 2012 14: 14
      Strong article - goosebumps already.
      Quote: grizzlir
      what will happen if we push into the frontal ABRAMS and our T-90

      So after all, the article says - the ram was carried aboard. But I liked your train of thought (s).
    3. schta
      +1
      6 February 2012 15: 15
      If you hit a frontal armor with a rib on a sloth or a driving wheel, you can inflate the fascist, and with fanaticism and luck roll the gun or even turn the tower off the shoulder straps.
      By ram, I’m still inclined to understand not a thoughtless blow, but a targeted action.
  3. +4
    3 February 2012 10: 24
    Glory to the Russian Heroes of the Great Patriotic War !!!!!!!!!!
    1. Odesit
      0
      3 February 2012 22: 31
      ETERNAL GLORY! CORRECTLY! TARAN - WEAPONS OF THE BRAVE!
      1. Arc76
        -4
        4 February 2012 18: 29
        Ram ram weapons are stupid.
  4. Strabo
    +1
    3 February 2012 11: 19
    Ram, as a battle technique, a necessary measure. Most likely the hero’s desperate act in which the ammunition has run out. Or clutches were covered and there is no possibility to maneuver. After all, what’s interesting, the gearbox on the T-34 was without synchronizers and to equalize the peripheral speeds of the gears, a gear shift method with double switching off the main clutch was used. In this case, it is necessary to disperse the tank, increasing engine speed. Switch off the main clutch and at the same time reduce the fuel supply. Turn off the gear, turn on the low gear and disperse the ram tank. Indeed, the heroes, according to the stories of participants in the Second World War, often included speed with a sledgehammer.

    nice article and nice pics.
    1. grizzlir
      +5
      3 February 2012 11: 36
      I’ll probably tell you a secret, with double squeezing and overdriving, you need to shift gears on almost all trucks manufactured in the last century, as well as on UAZ cars. Even now, this technique is necessary to change gears on some Chinese and Korean SUVs and many trucks. it was really very difficult to shift gears due to a clutch that did not turn off completely and had to use a lot of force to stick the gear in. Often the shooter helped the mechanic to shift the gear adist.Problemu was solved only on the T-34-85.
      1. +1
        3 February 2012 12: 22
        The way it is
  5. DYMITRY
    +10
    3 February 2012 13: 20
    The best air defense in the world - our tanks at the enemy airfield!
  6. +1
    3 February 2012 13: 26
    What to say ------ Our proud Varangian does not build an enemy

    and bringing to life the sayings To die like that with music.
    especially considering that tankers, to such an extent as flamethrowers and snipers, were not very eager to capture and generally had to count on good treatment.
  7. +3
    3 February 2012 13: 30
    Eternal memory to the fallen heroes!
  8. Conditer1488
    +2
    3 February 2012 14: 27
    Heroism also needs to be wisely.
    In the course of the first photo, the t-34 destroyed the cannon, ramming it, but it seemed to be stuck in the same place. as a result, the loss of one tank from our formation almost out of the blue.
    1. Odesit
      0
      3 February 2012 22: 42
      Confectioner 1488
      Only 34 went around the battery position from the rear, as is clear from the photograph.
      That is, there was a plan for maneuver! We don’t see what is happening in the stern of the tank, maybe there it has damage there from a shell! Please note that the tower is turned to the right, as if he was preparing to hit the enemy, but did not have time.
      In a war, the situation is often unpredictable.
  9. 755962
    +1
    3 February 2012 16: 14
    Battering ram, as the last argument in battle, it’s like the cartridges run out, but you have to fight. What courage you need to have! As in the song, "To the madness of the brave, we sing a song!"
    1. Odesit
      0
      4 February 2012 10: 54
      Ah right Dear Eugene!
      With great respect to you!
      You very correctly expressed the thought!
      I fully agree with you!
  10. Strabo
    0
    3 February 2012 18: 58
    For the wise guy grizzlir - at least read literature about double squeezing. I will tell you a terrible secret. The main difficulty was to control the tank using onboard clutches. The control mechanism - on-board friction clutches and brakes - needs constant adjustment. Side clutches were most effective when driving on soft ground and dirt, as a result of which the tank moved easily along a country road. So it is written state. commission in custody when accepting the tank. Double squeezing is nothing to do with expensive. This is not a car but a tank.
    1. grizzlir
      +1
      3 February 2012 20: 00
      Quote: Strabo
      After all, what’s interesting, the transmission on the T-34 was without synchronizers, and to equalize the peripheral speeds of the gears, a gear shift method with double shutdown of the main clutch was used

      For the wise guy Strabo, didn’t you write this? I just gave an example of double squeezing, although in fact the problem with shifting the T-34 gear was different, turn the friction clutch off a hundred times, if it is not completely disconnected, it is difficult to stick the gear in. The biggest problem with the T-34 for a long time remained the gearbox with the so-called sliding gears. Shifting gears on the move with it was not an easy task. The design of the main clutch, which almost never turned off completely, interfered with this process. If the main clutch is not switched off, only the very experienced mechanics-drivers could “stick” the necessary gear. Learn the mat part.
  11. Arc76
    0
    4 February 2012 18: 39
    Why bother tiger at T34, if it was possible to destroy it with a cannon at a distance of 500 meters. The most difficult thing was just to get to the tiger at such a distance, the German beat T34 from 1500-2000 meters and their tank tactics with the appearance of the tiger was designed specifically for the use of a long arm.
  12. T1GER_1
    +1
    4 February 2012 22: 34
    Why bother tiger at T34, if at a distance of 500 meters it could be destroyed by a cannon. Yeah, and even Mouse could have been, but the truth is on the side, right?))) In a collision, it’s not always the case, only if you drop into the side or the stern.
    On the tiger, Michael Wittmann used this tactic against the Allies when he stopped the reconnaissance armored column, just ran into several tanks, crushed and fled the soldiers and tankers. A heavy tank to ram it is not a desperate step, but rather a demoralizing one)))
    1. Arc76
      0
      5 February 2012 00: 07
      Wittmann replaced two tigers in this battle.
    2. Arc76
      0
      5 February 2012 15: 42
      Otto Carius wrote about productive hits from 600 meters in the forehead.
    3. DYMITRY
      0
      6 February 2012 07: 35
      From 500 meters, the tiger made its way into any projection in 5 cases out of 6, so the only question is how to get to these 500 meters. In addition, very quickly after the appearance of the tigers, and in many ways in response to them, new tanks appeared, for example, KV-1S and IS-2 (122 mm gun), which pierced the tiger from the same distance of 1,5-2 km. By the way, the tiger at this distance pierced the above tanks only in the forehead or side, due to rational angles of inclination of the armor. As for the Allied boxes, no comment at all.
      1. Arc76
        0
        7 February 2012 12: 50
        The tiger and is2 fight is considered in his book by Baryatinsky. For one shot, the is2 tiger could respond with three-let separate loading, add the unimportant here, in comparison with Zeiss, the quality of our optics.
  13. Strabo
    0
    6 February 2012 11: 10
    Some clever people instead of discussing the article, but apparently there is nothing to write on it. Trying to comment on others and stupidly minus. For
    grizzlir will reveal the secret - read more.

    Some clever people instead of discussing the article, but apparently there is nothing to write on it. Trying to comment on others and stupidly minus. For
    grizzlir will reveal the secret - read more.

    Some clever people, instead of discussing the article, but apparently they have nothing to write on it. Trying to comment on others and stupidly minus. For
    grizzlir will reveal the secret - read more.

    Some clever people, instead of discussing the article, but apparently they have nothing to write on it. Trying to comment on others and stupidly minus. For
    grizzlir will reveal the secret - read more.
  14. lds040580
    +1
    17 August 2012 11: 32
    Ram armored train ------ OH .... THAT !!!!!!! This is tin !!!!! angry
  15. 0
    21 December 2012 09: 34
    I remember, while driving the BTRD, under the demonstrative control of the commander’s platoon, the box ran into a tree in 1 or 2 gears. Feeling is not for the faint of heart. Then he proved for a long time to the deputy battalion commander that the bump on his forehead was not from hazing, but was earned, so to speak, on legal grounds, as close as possible to military ones. And then consciously accelerate and crash into the armored monster from time to time, sometimes exceeding its own tank in mass, and even more so in an armored train. Iron people were.
  16. 0
    15 October 2016 10: 48
    Regarding the tank rams of the 5th Panzer Division, there is even a photograph.
    signature to her: Soviet tank BT-7 with a conical turret and tactical sign “White Cross” on the armor of 5 tank division 3 Mechanized Corps 11 Army rammed a German staff car. Staff car belongs to the third tank battalion communication of the 7th Panzer Division (7.Pz.Div.) Date: 22-23 June 1941 Location: Lithuania, Alytus district Translation: Soviet BT-7 tank with a conical tower and tactical mark “White cross ”of the 5th Panzer Division of the 3rd Mechanized Corps of the 11th Army rammed a German headquarters vehicle. The headquarters vehicle belongs to the 3rd Tank Communication Battalion of the 7th Tank Division (7.PZ Div.) Date: June 22-23, 1941 Location: Lithuania, Alytus District.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"