Military Review

Ryazan paratroopers received a batch of new armored vehicles

41
The ceremony of handing over the 137-th regiment of the Airborne Forces to new armored vehicles took place in Ryazan, the press service of the Tractor Plants concern reported.




The paratroopers received the first battalion set of BMD-4M and BTR-MDM. Serial production of new equipment for the Airborne Forces began in Kurgan in 2016.

“BMD-4M is capable of fighting the most modern at ranges of up to five kilometers tanks. It can fire at a distance of up to seven kilometers with high-explosive shells. The machine is maneuverable, high-speed, floating, landing, has a navigation system and is effectively used to combat air targets, ”the press service quotes the words of the commander of the Airborne Forces Andrei Serdyukov.



It is noted that the main advantage of the new machine is powerful weapons. The combat module Bakhcha is equipped with two millimeter 100 and 30 caliber guns, guided by anti-tank missiles and a machine gun. Tracked armored personnel carrier BTR-MDM "Shell" can parachute from the air and, thanks to an adjustable suspension, can change its height, ”noted the company.



Photos used:
https://defence.ru
41 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 210ox
    210ox 23 January 2017 14: 48
    +21
    In the photo, the most impressive thing is the new ammunition of the crews, helmets, body armor .. Although the equipment is what you need ..
    1. kolkulon
      kolkulon 23 January 2017 14: 52
      +1
      If the sticking trunks of Kalash had not spoiled the picture, there would have been a fairy tale.
      1. Oldenburg
        Oldenburg 23 January 2017 15: 01
        +16
        Why didn’t you please Kalash. Every self-respecting tanker has his own Kalash. If they give it with a butt, then the butt is unscrewed and thrown away.
        1. lelikas
          lelikas 23 January 2017 15: 17
          +3
          Railguns are probably needed.
          1. stew
            stew 24 January 2017 17: 54
            0
            saber and horse
      2. cniza
        cniza 23 January 2017 15: 04
        +9
        “The BMD-4M is capable of fighting the most modern tanks at ranges of up to five kilometers. It can fire at a distance of up to seven kilometers with high-explosive shells. The machine is maneuverable, high-speed, floating, landing, has a navigation system and is effectively used to combat air targets ”,


        It is very impressive now to increase production and deliver to the operating parts without slowing down.
      3. x.andvlad
        x.andvlad 23 January 2017 15: 22
        +9
        Quote: kolkulon
        If the sticking trunks of Kalash had not spoiled the picture, there would have been a fairy tale.

        M-d ... The remark is strange, to say the least.
        And the news is just great. New weapons are supplied to the troops regularly. Compared to the good old BMD-1 and 2, just "Song".
      4. Now we are free
        Now we are free 23 January 2017 15: 51
        +6
        Thank God that the "Gardeners" and Rakushi "finally began to de Facto enter the Airborne Forces, our most mobile and combat-ready troops! The" Shaman "gnawed these machines for the Winged Infantry with his teeth, I hope that first of all they will change for the" Gardeners " Deuces "and it's funny to say -" Ones ".
  2. bouncyhunter
    bouncyhunter 23 January 2017 14: 49
    +14
    News about the arrival of new equipment in the troops has become a good tradition! good
  3. alstr
    alstr 23 January 2017 14: 53
    +3
    What can I say: I wish you the speedy development of new technology, and also that such kits arrive in abundance at a reasonable time.
  4. Damir
    Damir 23 January 2017 15: 09
    +2
    few!!!!!!!
  5. domnich
    domnich 23 January 2017 15: 09
    +7
    Foreign analogues, if I’m not mistaken, are significantly inferior to our technology. Although in this area of ​​armaments, we all thank God!
  6. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 23 January 2017 15: 11
    +4
    This technique needs dynamic and active defense ... Without this, fighting means simply sending people to death ... Without active and dynamic defense, all these BMDs and armored personnel carriers are just a target for an enemy ATGM calculation ...
    We need a new concept for the troops - all military equipment - must be with dynamic and active protection, all rear for the transportation of goods and l / s must also be protected at the MRAP level and have a minimum of dynamic protection ... Get out in South Africa based on our Urals MRAP holds 21 kg of TNT under the wheel and 14 under the bottom !!! But our Typhoon is more expensive, as much as half a million dollars ... Yes, for x .... you need it ... You can’t do it - buy it in South Africa ... See how those who can do it, in the end ...


    What is the use of a tank or infantry fighting vehicle if it can be hit with the first shot from an ATGM ?! And this BMD-4 and Shell are just such, practically unprotected ... Better of course than nothing at all ... But for now there is a possibility and time to do BMD, BMP WITH PROTECTION AS DYNAMIC AND ACTIVE !!! OTHERWISE ABOUT WASHING YOUR BLOOD AGAIN ...
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 23 January 2017 15: 22
      +5
      Yeah, that would be confused when dropping slings for DZ blocks? There has been a variant with ceramics for a long time, but, as I understand it, the MO issue did not suit the price issue.
      1. Ratmir_Ryazan
        Ratmir_Ryazan 23 January 2017 15: 28
        +2
        And what can not be solved with slings in any way? Here's the trunk, observation devices, something slings do not get tangled, but for DZ blocks must be tangled ?!
        Ceramics that can withstand hits RPG and ATGM? I doubt it very much ...
        Without DZ, all this equipment is just coffins on wheels ... ATGM calculation will be 1,5 km from the location of this equipment, it will not be detected by anything, it will burn everything to hell with the dog ...
        But again, everything will be as usual, as in Chechnya, they began to check what was wrong with the tanks after several dozen of them were burned together with the crews ... It turned out that it seemed like DZ was without plastite, but really there were .... ... there was no DZ ... hundreds of BMPs were burned ...
        On which x .... then to land it without DZ, so that they die faster ?!
        1. heruv1me
          heruv1me 23 January 2017 15: 40
          +3
          I don’t think that everything is so simple with dz, I probably tried it and found out that even when the dz is triggered, the jet or projectile still breaks through thin aluminum armor. In short beztolku. And all kinds of active defenses are stupidly more dangerous for dismounted paratroopers than enemy shells.
          1. Ratmir_Ryazan
            Ratmir_Ryazan 23 January 2017 15: 52
            0
            Our boasted that there is a technology for installing DZ on lightly armored vehicles ... And at the expense of the harm of KAZ, this is all a myth, it can be turned off when you turn it on, when you don’t need to turn it off ... Or for example, even by sectors ... There is an infantry vehicle behind it, it turned off the KAZ in the rear and on the side in the front it is turned on, in the city you can turn it off if you have your own infantry from all sides, but is standing on the outpost in the caponier or operating without infantry or with infantry but inside you can turn on from the side of a probable shelling .. .
            Without KAZ and DZ, in modern combat, any equipment is simply ready-made zinc ... Now there are so many ATGMs and other anti-tank weapons that the tank will not go under fire on the field and 100 meters ... And with KAZ the Jews were tested, they worked without loss. .. Well, maybe there were losses, but a fact less than that ...
            Without DZ, neither the tank nor the BMD will have nothing to do in battle !!! No super-armor knockout panels help ... ATGMs and RPGs burn all this to hell ... Only DZ and KAZ can somehow protect armored vehicles ...
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 23 January 2017 22: 05
          0
          Yes, I’ll shoot this technique even from large-caliber rifles - in NATO countries in bulk these rifles are all sorts and different.
    2. alexmach
      alexmach 23 January 2017 20: 59
      +2
      Oh well. And are they generally applicable to light technology, is this dynamic protection applicable?
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 23 January 2017 22: 02
      +1
      "But our Typhoon is more expensive, it costs half a million dollars." In fact, the Typhoon costs 56 million rubles.
      1. a fresh look
        a fresh look 23 January 2017 23: 41
        0
        I think the Typhoon is a great car
    4. n.kolesnichenko
      n.kolesnichenko 23 January 2017 22: 39
      0
      Do you know the difference between BMP and BMD ?!
    5. _Slavs
      _Slavs 23 January 2017 22: 59
      +2
      Do not come up with 21kg, there is another NATO standard - blasting on soft ground-sand, ours are torn on concrete or on a piece of armor, explosives in a recess are more real. Those 21 are equal to 6-8 of ours. I don’t believe that in our opinion it could withstand 21 kg and only tear off the wheel, and there the engine will be thrown out by 20 dead. There will be complete sadness with the personnel. Which explosive? RDX, plastid, TNT, gunpowder, or something else. The impact will be different - either quickly and abruptly (plastid), or slower but powerfully (hexagen, gunpowder). On the road that the fools will undermine - with trotyl blocks of tape, rewound in a hole. Shchaz! a pair of 152mm - normal such a typical land mine and even a little tank does not wake up.

      So calm down - this is so that grenades are not thrown under the wheels, or drive through anti-infantry if it suddenly happens. I saw the Turks as the Kurds were tearing - they hang a regular bag of RDX on a 20–25 kg tree. There is nothing left of the Turkish MRAP. South Africa may be stronger - the rumpled charred skeleton will remain.
    6. cast iron
      cast iron 24 January 2017 01: 51
      +2
      You mixed everything together. For airborne forces, the specifics are rather narrow as applied to the strategy of the problem. That is why our airborne forces are not half the army, but only 4 divisions. About tasks of the Airborne Forces is on Wikipedia. The tasks of the Airborne Forces do not include a heroic defense of the front from advancing enemy army groups. This is the task of motorized rifle troops and tank armies.
      Equipment for the Airborne Forces is developed on the basis of tasks. One of the main conditions is air transportability. And this condition is incompatible with heavy armor. Therefore, heavy armor was replaced by powerful weapons on the BMD-4M.

      In general, I like your idea of ​​making the entire army transport armored. But it is very expensive. Even the United States, with its 600 billion dollars a year, could not make all of its army vehicles with bulletproof armor at least.

      The only real protection against anti-tank weapons in the airborne landing gear is the KAZ installation.
  7. Portuguese boat
    Portuguese boat 23 January 2017 16: 08
    +3
    The BMD-4M vehicle is not bad, I really like the Bakhcha module, it has proven itself well in battles in the Caucasus ... But the Shell with such primitive weapons can only be used for sanitary purposes and ammunition supply, but for this could be used out-of-date BMD-1 and BMD-2, so Shell is a waste of money.
  8. alexmach
    alexmach 23 January 2017 21: 02
    +1
    The paratroopers received the first BMD-4M and BTR-MDM battalion set


    Curious, but what is this battalion set? What is the amount of BMD and what is the number of armored personnel carriers?
    1. _Slavs
      _Slavs 23 January 2017 23: 17
      +1
      There are movies on YouTube - they say the exact number (about 30 BMD-4M), and even count it on a pause. Everything is on the parade ground. There are Tigers and Shells - in short, the kit is all that is in the battalion. About 6 years ago, in Stavropol, they immediately re-equipped the entire airborne regiment (there, of course, the machines were of that time and they were the first in the Soviet era to post everything at once) - there was a whole cerimonal.
  9. Praetorian4
    Praetorian4 23 January 2017 21: 18
    0
    My regiment is former. It’s good that the new equipment has started, otherwise there were such things with the park.
  10. a fresh look
    a fresh look 23 January 2017 23: 36
    0
    As for active protection, engineers need to set a task, let the Russian brains think about how to save Russian blood, or we’ll really wash ourselves.
    1. cast iron
      cast iron 24 January 2017 01: 53
      +1
      You don’t worry so much, thanks to the Russian capitalists, after 30 years in Russia, the Central Asian and Caucasian population professing Islam will become the main one. And whoever resists, they will put him under article 282 for inciting him. The main thing is that the population would continue to vote for the great capitalists since the youth of Gaidar and Chubais.
  11. Victorio
    Victorio 24 January 2017 00: 18
    0
    are the smallest mechanics in the photo?
  12. Each other
    Each other 24 January 2017 12: 24
    0
    Quote: cast iron
    You mixed everything together. For airborne forces, the specifics are rather narrow as applied to the strategy of the problem. That is why our airborne forces are not half the army, but only 4 divisions. About tasks of the Airborne Forces is on Wikipedia. The tasks of the Airborne Forces do not include a heroic defense of the front from advancing enemy army groups. This is the task of motorized rifle troops and tank armies.
    Equipment for the Airborne Forces is developed on the basis of tasks. One of the main conditions is air transportability. And this condition is incompatible with heavy armor. Therefore, heavy armor was replaced by powerful weapons on the BMD-4M.

    In general, I like your idea of ​​making the entire army transport armored. But it is very expensive. Even the United States, with its 600 billion dollars a year, could not make all of its army vehicles with bulletproof armor at least.

    The only real protection against anti-tank weapons in the airborne landing gear is the KAZ installation.


    Well, about the incompatibility of heavy armor and air transport it is you got excited ....

    And the fact that the tank cannot be dropped ... and how are you going to deliver all these BMD to the dumping site under the conditions of modern air defense? And one more question: is that enough aircraft? wink
    1. cast iron
      cast iron 29 January 2017 00: 15
      0
      And you on the "Ruslan" are going to carry 2 tanks to the front and back? Seriously? Are you aware that even in the USSR there were not so many of these “Ruslans”? But what about airfields? This Il-76 is capable of taking off from the ground. But the “Ruslan” with two tanks will not take off - he needs special bands.
      1. Each other
        Each other 29 January 2017 23: 37
        0
        Well, the Americans in Iraq drove and did not buzz. And two BMD in IL-76 is, in your opinion, a big force laughing I’m not going to carry anything with planes! I’m trying to slow-thinking to explain that in modern conditions, an attempt to land an assault is doomed to failure in advance. Modern air defense horseradish will allow. The range of its systems is several hundred km. The landing will be destroyed on the approach. And what will break through is not difficult to destroy with less technological means. (Example: downed IL-76 APU in Lugansk). One fighter with MANPADS - and there is no company of paratroopers or two or three BMD. So that the front will have to carry on the railway. Moreover, under the protection of its own air defense. And for the front line technology will have to get under its own power. And at the same time light armor BMD level BT tank of the last century. The Second World War showed everyone that a high-speed tank with light armor is beautiful in theory, and completely different rules apply on the battlefield. And all the development attempts on the landing technique, especially with the "bulletproof" armor, is money down the drain. As they say, generals always prepare for the past war.
        1. cast iron
          cast iron 30 January 2017 16: 40
          0
          Air transport means fast delivery of parts and units by air. You won’t be able to quickly deliver the right amount of tanks to a distance of 1500-2000 km by plane. But with BMD is another matter. They can be transported by much more numerous An-12 aircraft. And in the IL-76 they get 3 pieces at a time.

          Are you so fantasized about the destruction of the landing on approach that it seems that you are an expert on the destruction of military transport aircraft))))) Do you really think that you are smarter than the general staff officers who develop tactics and strategies for using the military branches? I personally think that destroying a military transport aircraft of a modern army is a non-trivial task. This is not for you to fight with the baboons in Africa or the Middle East. And then, who said that the landing is carried out only behind enemy lines? The Airborne Forces are also designed to block enemy breakthroughs - in this case, landing is carried out in their rear in the direction of the enemy breakthrough. And then no enemy air defense will knock anyone down.

          The downed Il76 in Ukraine is a bad example. The airfield is the only one. He was guarded by "cyborgs" with one crinkle. There is not only MANPADS enough, but a simple machine gun.

          And about the air defense. This is the S-300 at 300km in Russia in bullets. But NATO is much more modest.

          The Great Patriotic War showed at the beginning that 20 ton Wehrmacht tanks PzIII and 25 ton PzIV, as well as a bunch of 10 tons of different kinds of kids-light tanks, thanks to the general application strategy, they paid 30 tons of T-34 with bulletproof armor and 40 tons of KV monsters. So that light armor has significant chances to win, if it is used as it should.
          1. Each other
            Each other 1 February 2017 13: 29
            0
            You already decide, according to your opinion, "destroying a military transport aircraft of a modern army is not a trivial task" or "here not only MANPADS are enough, but a simple machine gun." laughing I’ll also remind you about Vietnam, when the Soviet S-75 with a range of 40 km did not give life to the American Air Force. And on account of the closure of the breakthrough, will you probably coordinate with the enemy that he would advance only through territories where the landing is possible from without air defense cover? And yet, will you collect the entire BTA of the country for such an assault? wink By the way, the IL-76 includes three BMD-1s, while the BMD-4 has different characteristics.
          2. Each other
            Each other 1 February 2017 14: 11
            0
            But where are you going to get these tanks? wink
            https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2016/06/22/8322239.sht
            ml
  13. PValery53
    PValery53 24 January 2017 23: 02
    0
    Citizens! Today at 23.05 Moscow time at the TVC film about Marshal G.K.Zhukov.
  14. hezbola
    hezbola 26 January 2017 04: 24
    +1
    beautiful car ,
    And how will she resist modern Scandinavian or Swiss self-propelled mortars at the same 5km? , how will she detect and hit them without a direct line of sight or blah? modern mines fall the first time. What protection does this mass grave have from mines 120, rpg30 and modern anti-tank missiles? from 12,7 / 14,5 / 20mm robotic sniper systems that don't emit any heat? It doesn’t even have a determinant of enemy optics like the old LP3.
    I’m silent about the protection and the minimum possibility of fighting drone UAVs and attack aircraft.
    1. cast iron
      cast iron 30 January 2017 16: 52
      0
      You mixed it up with a mortar. As a self-propelled mortar, the Airborne Forces have a wonderful Nona gun and a new Vienna self-propelled gun on the way. So compare them with the Swiss "super-mortars."

      Yes, there is no protection - you just need to drop your weapon and give up as soon as you see the super Swiss mortar.

      Robotic sniper complexes have one drawback - radio jamming very quickly and very soon. So expensive toys turn into uncontrollable scrap metal.

      You did not study well at school in physics. It is not possible to shove ballistic tank armor into 15 tons of mass. Military equipment is a compromise. Which direction he will move in depends on the technical specifications and the strategy for using a certain type of equipment.

      About the ability to deal with drone UAVs, it’s better to shut up - pass for smart. With targets such as "aircraft" are fighting mobile and stationary air defense systems and on the last ray of MANPADS. Not a single infantry fighting vehicle or tank is capable of fighting aviation - they do not have such an opportunity. And shove into one unit and a mortar, and a tank gun, and air defense missiles and powerful armor with a small mass - this is possible only in your school fantasies.
      1. hezbola
        hezbola 30 January 2017 19: 03
        0
        Quote: cast iron
        You mixed it up with a mortar. As a self-propelled mortar, the Airborne Forces have a wonderful Nona gun and a new Vienna self-propelled gun on the way. So compare them with the Swiss "super-mortars."

        Yes, there is no protection - you just need to drop your weapon and give up as soon as you see the super Swiss mortar.

        Robotic sniper complexes have one drawback - radio jamming very quickly and very soon. So expensive toys turn into uncontrollable scrap metal.

        You did not study well at school in physics. It is not possible to shove ballistic tank armor into 15 tons of mass. Military equipment is a compromise. Which direction he will move in depends on the technical specifications and the strategy for using a certain type of equipment.

        About the ability to deal with drone UAVs, it’s better to shut up - pass for smart. With targets such as "aircraft" are fighting mobile and stationary air defense systems and on the last ray of MANPADS. Not a single infantry fighting vehicle or tank is capable of fighting aviation - they do not have such an opportunity. And shove into one unit and a mortar, and a tank gun, and air defense missiles and powerful armor with a small mass - this is possible only in your school fantasies.


        - Nona is not the same in electronics as amos or patria is not even nearby.

        - quickly you give up however. you are not Russian in my opinion ..

        - Does BMP have any reb systems? or they will be thrown off separately from il 76 / bdk after bmd / bmp ..

        - Who offers tank reservation for BMP? For a long time there are radars for flying shells artillery and anti-tank systems, determinants of optics like that of the FSO. Alexei, just don’t say that you are a farmer ..

        - man-portable air defense system works up to 5 km in height, if not less, strike UAVs attack from 6 km, helicopter mount takes out from 8 km, your man-portable air defense system will not be appropriate here, so what kind of air defense system are you going to land during an airborne operation abroad? Shkolota.