The cost of flight hours of US aircraft involved in the Middle East

30
The American portal Defense One published a curious infographic that vividly shows the cost of one flight hour of various aircraft used by the Pentagon in Iraq and Syria to combat the IG grouping (banned in the Russian Federation).



  • Defense One
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    23 January 2017 12: 02
    Is a reaper more expensive than an apache?
    1. +11
      23 January 2017 12: 08
      They do not shell out badly, but what are we in this regard, what money are we spending? Although, you still need to consider efficiency.
      1. +11
        23 January 2017 12: 12
        Interesting numbers that raise many questions ...
      2. 0
        23 January 2017 19: 43
        [quote = cniza] They do not fork out badly, but what are we in this regard, what money are we spending? Although, you still need to consider efficiency. [/
        Of course, it would be nice to place a similar plate on "our" aircraft, but the assessment of efficiency is too subjective. Let the plate be similar.
    2. +7
      23 January 2017 12: 10
      spirit
      Is a reaper more expensive than an apache?
      And who is easy in this life. The control of drones requires more of those personnel on earth. Starting from technicians and ending with the service of the MCC tracking and guidance satellites ..
  2. +5
    23 January 2017 12: 04
    Here are the ones on ... I did not expect that the cost of a flight hour for a drone is twice as high as for a Hornet controlled by a flyer ..
    1. 0
      23 January 2017 12: 08
      And yet. Please enlighten experts than F15s is more expensive than "Hornet"
      1. +5
        23 January 2017 12: 20
        Quote: 210ox
        And yet. Please enlighten experts than F15s is more expensive than "Hornet"

        And the fact that the F-22 is second only to the B-52 in price, leaving everyone else far behind, does it surprise you?
      2. 0
        23 January 2017 19: 54
        Quote: 210ox
        And yet. Please enlighten experts than F15s is more expensive than "Hornet"

        No fucking up. Look better on Wikipedia.
    2. +6
      23 January 2017 12: 10
      Quote: 210ox
      Here are the ones on ... I did not expect that the cost of a flight hour for a drone is twice as high as for a Hornet controlled by a flyer ..

      You specify WHAT UAV ... RQ-4B

      The rest are UAVs in the leaders of cheapness ...
      1. +1
        23 January 2017 12: 16
        Okay, does the Reaper's flight cost nearly the same as that of a strategist?
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: 210ox
        Here are the ones on ... I did not expect that the cost of a flight hour for a drone is twice as high as for a Hornet controlled by a flyer ..

        You specify WHAT UAV ... RQ-4B

        The rest are UAVs in the leaders of cheapness ...
      2. +4
        23 January 2017 12: 16
        Indicative shot. And, it happens that the abbreviation UAV automatically evokes the image of a small airplane.
      3. +15
        23 January 2017 12: 42
        Quote: svp67

        You specify WHAT UAV ... RQ-4B

        .

        Does he remind me of the Alien?
        1. +1
          23 January 2017 12: 49
          Quote: Shuttle
          Does he remind me of the Alien?

          What is he like for us? Only "stranger" ... they are all "strangers" to us
      4. 0
        23 January 2017 15: 02
        belay wow size
    3. 0
      23 January 2017 19: 58
      The Hornet F18 is an advanced machine of its time, it was the first to implement a program to reduce labor and operating costs at the aircraft design stage. This is the first time on jet combat aircraft .......
  3. +13
    23 January 2017 12: 07
    And I would not mind seeing the same scheme about our equipment used there. I think that not only I am alone ...
    1. +3
      23 January 2017 15: 10
      I join why such things are written only about foreign aviation equipment, but about our numbers, only vague statements, everything is super, etc. .. Author, can you deal with this issue? I would like to know how much our fighters eat, or the contrast will be too sharp and not in our favor. It is clear that in this matter we are inferior, but only by how much? After all, we have in service heavy and very heavy vehicles, which in Syria destroyed the budget for the year of war in three months, we had to urgently declare victory and send most of the boards home.
      1. 0
        23 January 2017 23: 55
        Quote: vanek77
        I want to know how much our fighters eat

        Then you can roughly calculate how much it costs us the war in Syria, and this is classified information. bully
        An hour of flight of the Tu-160 (without combat use) cost 2008 thousand rubles in 580. according to General Nogovitsyn.
  4. +1
    23 January 2017 12: 15
    The cheapest in operation is the T-6A Teksan training aircraft, the most expensive is the E-4B control plane ($ 149 thousand). Next in cost are the B-2A and the Open Skies OC-135B.
  5. +1
    23 January 2017 12: 48
    Bronco as always drags. laughing
    1. +8
      23 January 2017 13: 34
      Therefore, in the world there is still a demand for all sorts of SuperTukano, Tractors and Sesny with Mavericks + actively sawing AHRLAS.

      For it is cheap and effective according to broads.
      1. 0
        23 January 2017 14: 11
        Of course, such aircraft are cheap and efficient. ^ _ ^
  6. +2
    23 January 2017 13: 12
    Because they especially do not see in Syria and Iraq.
  7. ZVS
    +2
    23 January 2017 13: 35
    Judging by the schedule, the use of strike UAVs is twice as expensive as the use of fighters and is comparable to the use of B-1A. Dear little thing.
  8. +5
    23 January 2017 13: 40
    it would be necessary to compare the cost of our flights, in order to understand how much you can bankrupt amers by raising their air force in the air)))) (of course, a joke)
    1. 0
      23 January 2017 20: 17
      Same, if not more. SU-24 is especially expensive, it has very low-cost engines, only about $ 9000 in fuel, it is very expensive to operate and has low reliability, it requires a lot of spare parts and consumables ..... big labor for 1 hour of flight of technical staff, although the cost of our ITS is less .... And it is not yet known who is ruining whom? Their machine works properly, and we only work out, like everyone else, its work .....
  9. 0
    23 January 2017 23: 29
    Finally, at least someone prompted the audience to think about the price (s) of the issue. If it could be compared with the technical and economic indicators of Soviet technology, then questions would inevitably arise: 1) who is to blame? 2) what to do with it? No wonder many rightly drew attention to the relationship between F-16 and F | A-18.
    1. 0
      24 January 2017 02: 26
      Interestingly, there are specialists on the forum who, at the level of an engineer with work experience, can analyze and draw conclusions on the operation and reliability of different types of combat aircraft, after all, factory characteristics are often advertising in nature and do not fully reflect the temporal characteristics and do not take into account all the features of the preparation and operation of combat aircraft. Do you remember the saying with the taste of "black humor": The designer is dry, the plane is wet, the technician is wet, and the pilot is d ... "... Although the SU-27 and its sequels are distinguished by a very convenient layout and maintenance at all types of training, but routine maintenance at the complexes is not well thought out, and often not performed and requires very high-level specialists, who are not and cannot be in the units ...
  10. 0
    24 January 2017 14: 30
    The news is presented as if this portal presented this infographic only yesterday. Meanwhile, as this picture was presented six months ago.
    By the way, I advise you to visit this portal itself and read how information on Syria is presented by a "potential ... partner".

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"