Military Review

Project "ZZ". Tanks on the lawn of the White House: Trampomania as a diagnosis

35
What will disgruntled Americans do with Trump? Shot? Poison? Will impeach him? Or overthrown with Putin? Or will it be the other way around, and will the trio of Trump, Putin and Marine Le Pen triumph in Washington? Or maybe Putin’s ideas, promoted by Trump, will get to Kiev, where the “Ukrainian version of Putin” will sit on the throne?


Forty-fifth President came to power in the USA. His name is Donald Trump. The inauguration of the new leader of the nation was accompanied in the United States by protest marches, scandals, mocking articles in the media and conspiracy versions of the near future.

The campaign against Trump gained such momentum that the rating of the elected (recall, not by the majority of the people, but by the majority of the electors) of the president fell, setting a kind of anti-record. Major protests took place in Washington and New York. According to some sources, several dozen prominent congressmen refused to attend the inauguration ceremony. High-ranking Democrats in various ways ignored the Republican taking the oath: many in general temporarily left Washington with their families. According to rumors, on one of the protest marches (in New York) have seen even ... Belarusian leader comrade. Lukashenko.

Project "ZZ". Tanks on the lawn of the White House: Trampomania as a diagnosis

Double of Comrade Lukashenko (background)


In a large article by the BBC correspondent and the New America Foundation employee Paul Wood (Paul Wood), published in "The Spectator", the author is not without evil irony talks about the future of President Trump. What will happen to this person? Will they kill him? Overthrown? Maybe they will impeach him?

The elected president took office, and now the whole of Washington says that "how bad it will end." Why so? And because the new leader of the nation was "at war" at the same time with the media and the intelligence community before taking the oath. Is it possible to assume from this that Trump, like Nixon, will eventually be forced to resign? (Recall, Mr. Nixon was the only American president who resigned before the end of the term of government.)


An illustration from The Spectator magazine


But it seems absurd: to ask such a question during the inauguration of the new president. And yet, the Senate Intelligence Committee has already announced hearings about “ties between Russia and those responsible for political campaigns.” The chairman of the committee (Republican, by the way) made a statement saying that the request will be decided at the “two-party” level and decides “to issue subpoenas if such is necessary to testify”. And if it turns out that Trump’s employees or friends did indeed meet with Russian officials in order to “coordinate the hacker presidential elections in the United States,” then senators would consider the word “treason” to be the appropriate word for defining such actions. This word means the largest of the crimes mentioned in the constitution. Impeachment will follow the definition.

True, Trump's people deny that any such meetings have taken place.

One of Trump's clear opponents is Congresswoman Maxine Walters, Democrat. In anger, she told MSNBC cable news channel that Trump “wrapped his hands so tightly on Putin ...” So you’ll have to figure out all of Trump's real connections with Putin. “Let's find out ... Are we in the free world sitting in the highest chair a person who can be hostage to Putin and Russia?” She says.

There are other supporters of Trump's overthrow.

Professor Robert Kuttner is making personal efforts to impeach the elected head of state. He is engaged in the creation of an "independent body consisting of highly reputable lawyers" and other high-class experts whose purpose will be to collect materials for Trump's "abuse record". The dossier will be submitted later to the legal committee of the House of Representatives, and there is a short distance to the impeachment hearings. Professor Kuttner lays hopes on a clause of the United States Constitution, indicating that an official has no right to accept gifts from foreign countries unless authorized by Congress. The founding fathers of the United States believed that the danger of foreign corruption entering the state was rather high. They meant "the infamous incident involving Benjamin Franklin, to whom the king of France presented a diamond-encrusted snuffbox." Franklin was allowed to keep the gift only after the approval of the act by the Continental Congress. However, Trump's lawyers said that they do not think that the relevant constitutional article applies to him. Trump himself said in an interview with the New York Times that “the law is completely” on his side.

There are, however, other options for eliminating Trump from power.

According to "news"The conspiracy site Infowars, Trump can kill ... the CIA. During the CIA attack on Mr. Trump, the resource advises citizens to stay at home, not to go anywhere and thus “wait out the storm”. Media at this time can not be trusted. Citizens themselves should notice whether there was a coup d'état. Alex Jones, the main man on Infowars, told the listeners on the radio that he was expecting a military coup. Proof of? Well, for example, Rosie O'Donnell, a liberal TV presenter who once quarreled with Trump, tweeted about the need to introduce a “state of emergency” in the country. It is necessary to find out whether Mr. Trump is a “Russian agent”. Jones also points out that 50 will be relocated to millions of Americans "in correctional camps."

Oddly enough, the author of the article, Paul Wood, notes, but I also heard something similar at the "immaculately liberal cocktail in Washington." It was still before the election. There were people representing national intelligence. “If Trump is elected,” said one of the guests, “it will end in a military coup.” This guest even predicted "Tanks on the lawn of the White House. "

In the meantime, other conspiracy hypotheses are multiplying. Trump is not overthrown. On the contrary, a troika consisting of Trump, Putin and Marine Le Pen will triumph in Washington. About this with enthusiasm tells Adam Lusher (Adam Lusher) in the British newspaper «The Independent». “Washington will be ours” (“Washington will be ours”). Putin himself is allegedly counting on it. The author of the article calls Trumpomania (trampomania) an amazing process of Washington’s political acquisition.

In Moscow at the night party showed portraits of Trump, Vladimir Putin and Marine Le Pen. One of the organizers of the party is Konstantin Rykov, who previously worked as a deputy and was a member of Putin’s party, United Russia, and also referred to in the press as the Kremlin web propagandist. This companion wrote on Facebook: “See you tonight. Washington will be ours. ”

Adam Lüscher also reports that the Russians, in the framework of the “trampomania”, marked the victory of Donald with the release of commemorative coins and matryoshkas. No wonder after the announcement of the results of elections in the United States, one well-known critic of Putin and former Russian parliamentarian Gennady Gudkov said that the country “took control of tramping”: everything from the media and politicians to astrologers and housewives plunged into it. “His Majesty Trump” is now the main person for Russian news. According to Gudkov, the state-run media Trump is also needed on air to cover up the “oppressive” inner truth.

The greatness of Trump and his solidarity with Putin are so great that in Kiev the appearance of a creature of either Trump or Putin - in short, the “Ukrainian Putin” is expected.

This writes Ilya Ponomarev (Ilya Ponomarev) in the journal Newsweek.

What deal can make Trump with Putin? This deal will certainly determine the order of things in Europe and can resolve the conflict between the West and Russia. The influential Ukrainian tycoon Viktor Pinchuk, the author recalls, caused a sensation when he offered to find a compromise between the United States, Russia and Ukraine through the American media. He offered Kiev to abandon plans for European and Euro-Atlantic integration, forget about the Crimea and focus on its own economic development. Two "superpowers" in exchange for this will establish peace and guarantee the territorial integrity of Ukraine (or rather, what remains of it "after the aggression"). The Ukrainian public, of course, "was outraged by Pinchuk's proposal" and denounced him as a traitor.

The main reason why Putin is so popular in Russia is the failure of liberal reforms in the 1990s, the author believes. In those years, it was customary to pretend that the transformation was under the direction of "Western advisers", and as a result, "the majority of impoverished Russians" blamed America for negative changes. Now there is the same process, but not in Moscow, but in Kiev. “If the West continues its current policy, then Ukrainian officials in power will accuse foreigners of their own incompetence and corruption, and then you will see some Ukrainian version of Putin in the office ...” This has already happened in Moldova.

To achieve a different result, the West will have to make Ukraine prosperous: to prove "the superiority of a free and open society over state capitalism." Looking at the prosperity of Ukraine, says the author, the Russians themselves will remove Putin from the Kremlin.

* * *


Russian Putin will “clean” or not “clean”, it will become clear next year. March election-2018 will be shown. So it makes no sense to guess. Guessing is not necessary and the "impeachment" D. Trump. Neither senators, nor legal activists, nor intelligence officers have yet scored such a terrible compromising material on Trump, which would lead to an urgent meeting of the relevant committees and the commencement of hearings. Trump had already been tried to glue the “prostitutes”, but the case had not yet come to perjury in the style of Bill Clinton when he was tortured with sexual issues. In addition, the foggy figures of “prostitutes” and a very specific intern from the White House are characters of different levels.

In addition, gentlemen senators, as well as democrats who are opposed to Trump, should be put off collecting compromising materials. Say, pause days for a hundred. Something tells us that Donald won’t make a dude with Putin. Trump has already explained that if Putin “likes” Putin, then this is his, Trump, an asset, not Putin.
Author:
35 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 23 January 2017 09: 30
    +8
    Why are they attached to Trump? Okay, America, if not Europe, would get bogged down, what does it matter to them when they elect the US president?
    1. svp67
      svp67 23 January 2017 09: 35
      +9
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Why are they attached to Trump? Okay, America, if not Europe, would get bogged down, what does it matter to them when they elect the US president?

      How what? On and straight. Money, money, money and nothing personal. Trump told them: "if you want to live under the protection of the United States, pay money." Do you think it makes them happy?
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 23 January 2017 09: 38
        +6
        Quote: svp67
        is it very pleasing to them?

        The message is clear! But from their booze Clintonsha will no longer be assigned. So let sniff in a rag!
      2. Blondy
        Blondy 23 January 2017 09: 57
        +5
        Well, it’s a spot, in America and Europe you’re full of money, but why is money also? Look, how many people feed on articles and on television - this is not a hunchback in a mine for a piece of bread. You’ll have to solve your problems - you’ll have to work more seriously with your head, and you probably need more brains.
        1. svp67
          svp67 23 January 2017 10: 00
          +3
          Quote: Blondy
          And then what - money too?

          And we are just REALLY INTERESTING ... It's almost like in that joke:
          "Hello, are these firemen? We have a police patrol with an ambulance team fighting, so I don't know where to call."
          1. Sashka
            Sashka 23 January 2017 11: 53
            +4
            And I already wrote somehow ... I repeat:
            Well, if everything will be as we all expect, then I will start to think that V.V. Zhirinovsky is a SEER !!!
            Thirteen years ago, addressing Bush about the invasion of Iraq, he (???) said the following: "We will send another 13 million Russians to America and elect our president there."
            Well, and what is his 1998 speech about Ukraine and subsequent events?!?!
            Good day to all!!!
            1. andrewkor
              andrewkor 23 January 2017 19: 32
              +2
              And he promised that Russian soldiers will wash their boots in the Persian Gulf !! It seems like not far from Syria !!
      3. gladcu2
        gladcu2 23 January 2017 16: 55
        +1
        svp67

        And these losers pay money, only they pay money to NATO, not the United States.

        Is the difference visible? NATO, this is no longer the United States, it is an army outside national interests. For payments to go to the United States, you need to disperse NATO. And this is no longer easy.

        And if the USA replaces other people's armies with its own, then there will be no talk of sovereignty.

        And all this is nonsense. If capitalism is not driven into a very strict framework of laws, then there will be only temporary improvements. And everything went so far that the return point has already been passed.
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 23 January 2017 09: 46
      +7
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Why are they attached to Trump?


      Do you care? Let them buzz and thereby show their true face. And we have a new week, new concerns and problems. yes
      1. poacher
        poacher 23 January 2017 10: 53
        +1
        everything was gone, Don’s burned! Someone leaked us.
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 23 January 2017 10: 06
      +16
      Damn, I do not envy Oleg Chuvakin. To do a media review of the world's crazy houses, especially now, when the schiz of all stripes is rushing. request But Trump Pam Pam is not our president, but the United States Madhouse, so let him deal with his madhouse, and we have our own concerns. repeat
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 23 January 2017 11: 30
      +2
      Yeah, the February revolution begins in the USA. Oh well. Let's see what will be there in October-November. Judging by Trump's inaugural speech, he is more a communist than our Zyuganov. bully
    5. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 23 January 2017 13: 23
      +1
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Why are they attached to Trump? Okay, America, if not Europe, would get bogged down, what does it matter to them when they elect the US president?

      They are disappointed))) The fact that some three or four hackers from a "regional" power with an economy "torn" to shreds, simply over a can of beer, appoint an "unnecessary" US president, throwing such assets as the FBI and the CIA into the trash can , drives them into anguish. Soon they will have elections in the EU
    6. el coyote
      el coyote 23 January 2017 15: 18
      +5

      They seem to suspect something.
  2. Skeptic Self-Taught
    Skeptic Self-Taught 23 January 2017 09: 32
    +4
    Fortune telling again ...
    By the way. something Wang somehow wrong ... promised that 44 prezik in the states last. and here: there it is. Mikhalych ...
    1. Corsair
      Corsair 23 January 2017 09: 57
      +4
      Quote: Skeptic Self-taught
      By the way. something Wang somehow wrong ... promised that 44 prezik in the states last. and here: there it is.

      It seems to me that all these predictions for Wang and others were invented by someone after their death, although if they suddenly announce Trump as illegitimate and make a parliamentary republic, everything will come true.
    2. Egoza
      Egoza 23 January 2017 10: 55
      +4
      Quote: Skeptic Self-taught
      By the way. something Wang somehow wrong ... promised that 44 prezik in the states last. and here: there it is

      So he is the last US prezik entirely. If the predictions of cataclysms this year also come true, then half of the current United States will be. So it will be that Trump is the president of the remnants, and not the United States, as we know them. As for the EU .... as one user said "TRUMPets came"
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 23 January 2017 13: 25
        0
        Quote: Egoza
        So he is the last US prezik entirely. If the predictions of cataclysms this year also come true, then half of the current United States will be. So it will be that Trump is the president of the remnants, and not the United States, as we know them. As for the EU .... as one user said "TRUMPets came"

        That is not ...... She was talking about the president of the Negro, in the sense that there will be no more blacks in the US presidency. Obama was the first and last.
  3. Flinky
    Flinky 23 January 2017 09: 33
    0
    What is in the SGA, what is Oleg - there is nothing to do completely. How much can you conspire about Trump? Chose and choose, this is their problem, not ours.
  4. svp67
    svp67 23 January 2017 09: 36
    +1
    What will dissatisfied Americans do with Trump?
    And what will those who are satisfied with them do with them? With this development of events, it is time to take a closer look at which state is ready to hold a "referendum" ....
  5. AlexeyAlexey
    AlexeyAlexey 23 January 2017 09: 37
    0
    No matter how they later tied the dirt pouring on Trump with ties to the Kremlin, they say, to show that the Kremlin is friends with dictators, incites "hatred in the whole world", etc.
    1. svp67
      svp67 23 January 2017 09: 50
      +1
      Quote: AlexeyAlexey
      No matter how they later tied the dirt pouring on Trump with ties to the Kremlin, they say, to show that the Kremlin is friends with dictators, incites "hatred in the whole world", etc.

      You are late, they are ALREADY doing it, and even from the election campaign. This was one of the most "striking" arguments AGAINST Trump at Hilaryuga
  6. Portuguese boat
    Portuguese boat 23 January 2017 10: 06
    +3
    Barack Obama is a Negro from Kenya, and even a Muslim. And let's check everyone who touched Obama for ties with ISIS!
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 23 January 2017 19: 30
      +3
      He is a half-breed, not a pure black (his mother is a direct descendant of white slave owners). Therefore, you need to check the connection with the KKK.)))
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 23 January 2017 10: 11
    +3
    This time has come. In the United States, some recalled their historic prowess during the McCarthy era. Soon, for saying the word "Putin" once, you can lose your job with a "wolf ticket" and get into the "black lists". Strenuously and painstakingly digging a hole for themselves and their system.
  8. Glory1974
    Glory1974 23 January 2017 11: 09
    +2
    The main reason why Putin is so popular in Russia is the failure of liberal reforms in the 1990 years, the author believes. In those years, it was customary to pretend that the changes were being led by “Western advisers,” and as a result, “most impoverished Russians” blamed America for the negative changes.


    This is some kind of new theory. I have not heard of such a thing.
  9. Mestny
    Mestny 23 January 2017 11: 16
    +1
    Pay attention to the composition of the fiercely protesting:
    1. Representatives of LGBT
    2. Migrants
    3. Black
    4. Liberals
    And ... the Jews.
    It was of course clear that the world was gradually moving away along a new path of another war to destroy Russia. But that everything is so deep and serious that even just a vague hint (!) Of not even sympathy, but just a desire to normalize relations from the future US president, caused not just a hysteria among the ideologists of the destruction of Russia. It caused almost a revolution in the United States itself.
    From this we conclude - how deep and serious is the next attempt to destroy us.
    1. jjj
      jjj 23 January 2017 11: 44
      0
      I would only like to draw attention to the fact that Trump's son-in-law is a representative of Zionist organizations, and his daughter converted to Judaism ...
    2. kit_bellew
      kit_bellew 23 January 2017 15: 35
      +3
      Quote: Mestny
      But that everything is so deep and serious that even just a vague hint (!) Of not even sympathy, but just a desire to normalize relations from the future US president, caused not just a hysteria among the ideologists of the destruction of Russia. It caused almost a revolution in the United States itself.


      All the wine money money money
      All evil is from them, I would never see them.
      They came for me. Thank you for your attention.
      Now they must be killing.


      There will be no cold a sluggish war with Russia - the khan of the defense budget. And there they saw the defense budget - where are our Rosnanovites! Seventy years of experience, not everyone can boast, even NASA can not be compared.
      And, by the way, it’s clear why Hollywood is actively protesting, in particular Meryl Streep: she won an Oscar for her role Iron Maiden Iron Lady. That is Margaret Thatcher. That is, in fact - for the confrontation with Russia. If there is no confrontation, consider that all life has failed. And there are such characters there - to their deaths: actors, directors, screenwriters ... The fertile topic is: making a movie about a cunning ... puff ... Russian bath and how America will defeat them. And if relations improve, there will be no state order for such films. What to shoot ??? Confrontation with China? Nafig-nafig, they have Jet Li and Jackie Chan. And Terminator ™ is no longer a cake, it will not take out against these two.
      In general, everyone who actively protests against Trump, in the event he pursues the declared policy, tritely lose the loot. Under which they, quite possibly, have already got loans, all of these loans have been successfully banqueted or have done some other nonsense. But he wants to live! And live, as usual, without straining. At the expense of the state. By the way, nothing is different in this regard from the same scum of our domestic spill.
      I’m thinking: if Trump pushes a couple of nits there, at home, maybe, for us, Ulyukaev’s will not be limited to this?
    3. gladcu2
      gladcu2 23 January 2017 17: 09
      +2
      Local

      Why destroy Russia? There will be no one to scare. Yes, and Russia pays money. Buys securities from the United States.

      Yes, okay, don’t be afraid ..

      Trump is not a boy. Conflicts will be resolved in a balanced and consistent manner.

      These screams about Trump will calm down. Media financing will be reconfigured. Yes, and under capitalism, all people are united by a single problem. The life of the middle class and the impoverished is slowly but surely slipping into poverty. Resources pass into the possession of units, and all the rest cannot survive without renewal.

      So Trump, just in time.
  10. parusnik
    parusnik 23 January 2017 13: 47
    +2
    Trump is no better and no worse than other presidents of the United States, will continue the same policy that the United States pursued earlier, only in a slightly different vein ... Trump, Clinton, not sweeter ...
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 23 January 2017 17: 10
      +2
      parusnik

      Politics in the United States is still very dependent on the personality of the president.
      So the change is likely to be.
  11. iouris
    iouris 23 January 2017 15: 19
    0
    The main object of the author of this article is not "truncation", but "trancophobia". Although all manias, including those associated with the American billionaire, twice bankrupt, organizer of "beauty contests" (hello to Oksana Fedorova), in principle, are pathologies. The problem is that D. Trump will make all those interested (and not interested) in this topic pay a considerable price for the show.
  12. sds87
    sds87 25 January 2017 11: 23
    +1
    Konstantin Rykov, who previously worked as a deputy and was a member of Putin's United Russia party, and also referred to in the press as the Kremlin’s web propagandist. This friend wrote on Facebook: “See you in the evening. Washington will be ours. ”

    Well, why claim that? "Putin's Party" really wanted hysterical Hillary? This is a direct setup for Russia. Or Konstantin Rykov, having left the pariah, quickly changed his pants and is now throwing wood into the fire? In any case, a handful of people who received salaries from the Clinton and Obama Democratic funds for their anti-Russian activities will now substitute Trump and Russia with all their might, so long as they do not take away the feeding trough.
  13. Navy7981
    Navy7981 25 January 2017 22: 29
    0
    I think they are scared by the fact that Trump does not look like a "rag" and will make decisions based on the benefits for the United States (based on his campaign statements and by the way, he began, as they say, without leaving the cashier), and not listening like any ghouls with naked .... and the flag of the libero demo ideas that have nothing to do with real life.