Military Review

Washington's fleets-pawns in the APR and Europe will be armed with long-range "6-Standards": the threat to the Russian and Chinese Navy doubles

36

The launch stage of the SM-6 multi-purpose anti-aircraft missile is equipped with a Mk72 solid-propellant rocket engine with a period of 6 operation. It accelerates the rocket to a speed of about 4-4,5М, bringing it to an altitude of up to 7-8 km; Then a turbojet engine of the marching stage, with a similar work time, enters the work. It provides access to the stratosphere (to an altitude of 17-19 km) at a speed of the order of 9 — 9,5M, from where the rocket continues to climb by inertia to reach the most optimal trajectory for ultra-long flight



Extremely important from a geo-strategic point of view, the event occurred at the beginning of 2017 in the main US military department: the country's defense ministry allowed the main aerospace giant Raytheon to sell prospective SM-6 (RIM-174 ERAM) advanced anti-aircraft guided missiles to foreign customers, most of which are located in the Asia-Pacific region. It would seem that nothing supernatural happened, because the Japanese destroyers URO “Congo” and “Atago” were armed with anti-ballistic missiles RIM-161A / B, designed to intercept the “equipment” of OTBR and MRSD on the exo-stratosphere section of the flight trajectory, at the same time, in training interceptions, they showed themselves quite well. But not everything is so simple: interceptors of the RIM-161A family, although they have an 500 km radius of action, are highly specialized missiles for destroying ballistic targets outside the dense stratosphere, and therefore seriously affect the outcome of a hypothetical military conflict using low-altitude missile systems, large tactical missiles range, PRLR and UAV they can not. This is not the case with multipurpose anti-aircraft missiles such as the RIM-174 ERAM.

Long-range fire tests of the first prototype of the promising RIM-174 ERAM SAM began on September 5 of the year 2008. Then it was possible to achieve a long over-the-horizon interception of the BQM-74 "Chukar" air target, imitating a cruise missile. At the same time, the missile defense system used target designation data from a third-party source (obviously, the AWACS aircraft of the AWACS system) on the main flight leg and the active radar homing head (ARGSN) in the final leg. The homing head was developed on the basis of ARGSN installed on air combat guided missiles of the AIM-120C AMRAAM family and equipped with a digital programmable radio-correction module, which gives SM-6 another unique quality: the ability to receive target designation from any means of exchanging tactical information of sea, land or air basing . This quality was confirmed during the next training interception of an over-the-horizon air object that took place on 14 on September 2016. SAM RIM-174 ERAM was launched from a specialized ground-launch complex LLS-1 USS "Desert Ship" and entered the trajectory of a long-range interception target. Flight correction and target designation were performed onboard the X-NUMX-generation F-5A multi-purpose tactical fighter with the on-board AN / APG-35 radar.


Before you is a programmable multi-mode supersonic target for the Navy and the USAF GQM-163A "Coyote SSST". Americans and Japanese use it as an imitator of our anti-ship missiles “Mosquito” and “Onyx”, as well as Chinese YJ-91. The Coyote rocket was designed on the basis of two-stage SAM RIM-66G / 67D (SM-2MR / ER), but instead of a rocket engine, the march stage has a ramjet. The speed of the GQM-163A rocket, depending on the height, ranges from 3100 to 4200 km / h. At the same time, its maximum lateral overload during maneuvering amounts to only 12 units, which during the naval defense exercises provides data only on interception of “Mosquitoes”. P-800 “Onyx” or 3М54Е1 overloads can reach 20 units


In yet another trial, concerning the problems of destruction of air targets, 24 October 2014 years, were intercepted while 2 more complex object - subsonic sverhmalovysotnaya target BQM-74E and supersonic low-altitude GQM-163A «Coyote", flying from wave crest at about 2800 km speed / h Two interceptor missiles RIM-174 ERAM launched from UHFU Mk 41 missile cruiser URO CG-62 USS "Chancellorsville" destroyed targets on target designation of another "Aegis" ship - the destroyer URO USS DDG-102 "Sampson". SM-6 anti-aircraft guided missiles are equally fast interceptors (second only to maneuverability), like our 5В55РМ and 48Н6Е shipboard C-300F / FM, but they have several of the most important "trumps" that are on top of the moment, they are on top of now. in missile defense of warships of the Russian Navy.

1. Introduction of an active radar homing channel based on AIM-120C-7 missiles tested by the GOS, which allows receiving target designation from any units in the Link-16 tactical network, which in turn makes it possible to implement the “let-forget” mode and release (unload) the multi-element computing system AN / UYK-7 / 20 of the Aegis BIUS for more efficient performance of other tasks (for example, anti-ship). Our 5B55PM and 48Н6Е missiles to this day use only PARGSN, which assigns the task of tracking and highlighting 6 air targets to the antenna posts 3Р41 or 30Н6Е just prior to the moment of defeat of these goals. Moreover, the active radar homing RIM-174 ERAM perfectly compensates for the main disadvantage of "Aegis" - the presence of only 2-4-x target channels corresponding to the number of 1-channel radar AN and SPG-62. After upgrading the Aegis ship with more modern AMRL MRLS, the number of simultaneously fired targets can reach more than 25 units. Recall that our shipborne anti-aircraft missile system "Polimen-Redut" should reach the level of SM-6, but this will happen only after the integration of long-range missiles of the 40H6 type.

2. The second advantage is the radius of interception of air targets, which already today at RIM-174 ERAM reaches 370 km. Not a single Russian sea-based missile defense system today has such ultra-long-range characteristics: the 48H6E SAM, taking into account the parameters of the ship's on-load RPN 30H6E and semi-active RGSN, reaches the range of 160 km. Such a large range of the RIM-174 ERAM is explained by the constructive identity of its power rocket launcher with the installation of the RIM-161A / B interceptor (SM-3): the launch and the initial stage of the acceleration of the SM-6 occur due to the 468-kilogram solid fuel stage Mk72 operating on oligomer of butadiene with a hydroxyl functional group at the ends of the molecular chains. The booster stage is also equipped with a system for deflecting the thrust vector of 4's nozzles in the tail section of the rocket. The marching mode is accompanied by the operation of the 2-MASON TRM Mk104 with a mass of charge 360 kg; he brings the speed of the combat stage to about 9000 km / h. The maximum range in 370 km is achieved with a ballistic configuration of the flight path to the target with altitudes from 25 to 35 km; with a flat trajectory type, in the denser layers of the atmosphere (17-25 km), the range is limited to 240-270 km. There is also information that the latest versions of the “Standard Missile-6 Dual-I” will be able to intercept targets at a distance of 460 km, of course, with a mid-flight section at an altitude of about 35-40 km. Against this background, the existing "Forts-M" and the not fully modified Redoubts look very faded. The only advantage of our missiles of the 48H6 type will be high ultimate overloads up to 35-40 units, which allow to destroy intensely maneuvering supersonic air attack weapons.

Note that almost all informational Internet resources unanimously state that the maximum speed of the RIM-174 ERAM SAM includes 3,5 — 4М (in the stratosphere this is 3718 - 4250 km / h), but this information is absolutely groundless and far-fetched. After all, an anti-aircraft missile with a total period of operation of 2-x engines in 12 with a maximum speed of 4М would have a range of no more than 120-160 km. An example of this is the MIM-104A SAM of the American Patriot PAC-1 complex. With the SM-6 completely different история: being a constructive analogue of the SM-3 in the motor part, it also has similar speed parameters (up to 8-9М), allowing it to act on 370 — 400 km, subject to the stratospheric ballistic trajectory. There can be no talk of any 4M.

According to Western media reports, the “green light” that was given to Raytheon in its export program will allow the delivery of RIM-174 ERAM missiles to the Japanese Self-Defense Forces, the Australian Navy, and the South Korean Navy. This will be an extremely unexpected and powerful blow to the combat potential of the Russian Pacific Fleet and the Chinese Navy. Japanese missile control destroyers weapons Atago and Congo classes, Australian Hobart (Air Warfare Destroyer program), as well as South Korean KDX-III destroyers King Seojon the Great are equipped with universal Mk41-type launchers with various numbers of transport launch containers type Mk13 / 14 / 15. Starting Mk14 type container for storing and launching strategic winged type "Tomahawk" missiles or «Hyunmoo 3 / C» (South Korean analogue) and Mk13 / 15 containers carried combat work surface-to-air missile SM-2 / 3 / 6 and anti guided missiles RUM-139 "VL-Asroc". The unification of the RIM-174 ERAM SAM with launch containers Mk13 does not require any changes to the design of the MF41 UVPU as a whole, and therefore the adoption of the SM-6 will take a few months.


The launch of the anti-submarine guided missile RUM-139 "VL-Asroc" from the transport and launch container Mk15, located in the bow of the UHFM Mk41 destroyer class "Arley Burke" DDG-89 USS "Mustin"


After that, all the Far Eastern fleets-allies of the United States will be able to practically double the line of interception of anti-ship missiles launched from our and Chinese multi-purpose submarines and surface warships. As you already understood, the radio horizon will not be a big hindrance for this, because in the arsenals of the Air Forces of Japan, Australia and South Korea there are a sufficient number of E-2S, E-767C AWACS aircraft, as well as Boeing-2 AEW & C, which will detect these anti-ship missiles at a distance of 737-100 km, and then transmit the coordinates via a direct radio correction channel directly to the RIM-120 ERAM missile defense system. This means that the KUG of these states will be able to build a full-fledged echeloned missile defense system from Russian and Chinese anti-ship missiles. Now let's consider the real effectiveness of the SM-174 in the fight against the Chinese anti-ship missiles YJ-6 and YJ-100, as well as our Onyxes, Caliber, Mosquitoes and Volcanoes.

As we noted earlier, the SM-6 is not a highly maneuverable anti-aircraft guided missile, and therefore it is easy to intercept such 2,5-2,9-flywheel anti-ship missiles like Onyx, YJ-18 and 3М54Е Caliber-PL / NK are unlikely to succeed. CRP data are capable of performing intensive anti-aircraft maneuvers with 25-30 overload units, and also have ESR within 0,08 m2 in order to knock down at least 40% of such a "swarm swarm", such missiles like "Aster-30" are needed. Heavier anti-ship types P-1000 “Vulkan” (the shock basis of the flagship of the RKF “Varyag” flagship), as well as Chinese YJ-100 have a larger radar signature (ESR within 0,3 м2), speed from 0,9 to 2М, and also lower maneuver when leaving Zur. Their destruction for anti-aircraft missiles RIM-174 ERAM does not make much effort, which can be said about the subsonic anti-ship missiles of the X-35 “Uran”, as well as YJ-82. The chances of a “breakthrough” of the SM-6 defensive line of the 3-45 Granit rocket launcher, which are in service with the MAPL of 949A Antey Avenue in the Pacific Fleet, roughly correspond to the Onyx indicators, but are still slightly inferior, since the Granites much greater radar visibility.

One of the most unpleasant moments is that more than 40% of the total anti-ship arsenal of the Russian and Chinese fleets are represented by subsonic anti-ship missiles, or outdated supersonic samples with a large effective dispersion surface, and therefore the real-world fleet operators of new American anti-aircraft missiles SM-6 appear the opportunity for the next few years to dramatically change the balance of power in the Asia-Pacific region in its direction. But this is only a part of the “stones” abandoned in our garden by the current American regime with the help of the “descent from the leash” of the export capabilities of the main staff aerospace forge, the company Raytheon. And we will tell you about the rest of their portions.

In numerous news It is often mentioned in the reports that the SM-6 is a multi-mission missile, and this is indeed the case. In accordance with the advanced American concept "Distributed Lethality", on January 18, 2016, an anti-aircraft interceptor missile RIM-174 ERAM was tested against a remote surface target - the decommissioned EM FFG-57 USS "Reuben James. " Launched from the URO DDG-23 USS "John Paul Jones" (Arleigh Burke Flight-I class) destroyer, the promising SM-6 anti-aircraft missile was successfully used as a supersonic anti-aircraft missile for the first time. According to American resources, in the shooting, a network-centric link was used in the Link-16 tactical network between several warships at once: the ships closest to the target carried out target designation, and the remote DDG-23 made an over-the-horizon launch of the Standard.

A similar methodology for using Standard 6 makes a standard anti-missile a very powerful offensive weapon. Firstly, the flight speed of the RIM-174 ERAM to the target in the troposphere, depending on its range, can be from 2,5 to 3,7M, and this with a small ESR = 0,1 m2, there will really be no time for interception so much. Secondly, the anti-ship regime of SM-6 missiles will solve the problem of the insufficient number of Harpoons on all warships with the Aegis system: usually every surface ship of the US Navy or fleet any other country with western shipbuilding roots carries on board only 2 quadruple inclined launchers Mk141 with 8 anti-ship missiles RGM-84L “Harpoon”. Given the low performance characteristics of these subsonic missiles, their placement on board in the amount of 8 units. can be considered a tribute to fashion in the century of hypersonic speeds and transcendent maneuverability. SM-6 missiles, placed in Mk41 launchers in any ratio with other missile weapons, can be a big nuisance, for example, for the Chinese Kunming Type 052D EM or our large anti-submarine ships, pr. 1155 Udaloy. Of course, anti-ship "Standards-9" can also be shot down with "Daggers" and HHQ-6, but you will have to "sweat" over their number and speed. This is not 8 slow "Harpoons" for you!

Thirdly, the scale of modernization work carried out by Raytheon under the SM-6 project includes many modifications, including options for hitting ground targets at a distance of several hundred kilometers. Flight modes with high ballistic trajectories confirm this theory. Moreover, the active radar GPSN of the RIM-174 ERAM SAM can be improved by adding a millimeter range of operation, which will subsequently make it an excellent high-precision tactical missile capable of being used on land objects from shipborne UHFM Mk41, or from similar ground-based PUs in the composition of the Aegis Ashor anti-missile systems, the rocket will instantly fall into the category of offensive weapons. Most likely, the fact that today the SM-6 missile onboard computer software has a passive mode of operation of the homing head, which makes it possible to use it as an ultra-long-range anti-radar missile. It should be noted that similar experience was obtained by specialists of the American company “General Dynamics” in distant 67, during the development program for the promising multi-range anti-radar missile AGM-78 “Standard-ARM”. This PRLR should have replaced the Shrike and was developed on the basis of the ship's anti-aircraft guided missile RIM-66A (SM-1).


Being in service with the US Navy and the US Air Force from 1968 to 1976, the AGM-78 “Standard-ARM” medium-range anti-radar missile managed to get baptized in Vietnam and also on most of the best American tactical fighters and attack aircraft. those years: from Convair F-106 "Delta Dart" (in the top photo) and F-4G to A-6B / E "Intruder" and F-16B. A significant advantage of AGM-78 was the increased launch range to 75-80 km, which by 50% surpassed the performance of the CRMD AGM-45 "Shrike"


The Asia-Pacific direction is not the only missile-hazardous sector in which one can expect the emergence of promising multipurpose missile systems RIM-174 ERAM. For about 4 years now, Western European news agencies have periodically posted on their pages messages about the possible conclusion of a contract between the German Ministry of Defense and the manufacturer Raytheon for the purchase of RIM-161B (SM-3) interceptor missiles. The first information about such plans was published in the British magazine "Jane's Defense Weekly" with reference to the German Navy inspector Axel Schimpf on June 4, 2012. It is obvious that the interceptor missiles are planned to be placed on 2 classes of frigates that will be in service with the German fleet by 2019 - F124 Saxony and F125 Baden-Württemberg. These classes of ships are equipped with UVPU type Mk41 mod 10, which can be unified both with PR SM-3 and with SM-6 of similar dimensions. It is worth noting that the command of the German Navy has already estimated the cost of the program for the introduction of SM-3 interceptors on frigates of the F124 type, which amounted to about 900-950 million dollars. After such modernization, the Saxony-class frigates will become the first European NKs with long-range anti-missile defense capabilities (before the development of new versions of the Ater-30 Block-2 missile defense system). Considering the possibility of equipping four F3-class frigates with SM-6 and SM-125 missiles, the cost of the program could reach $ 2,5 billion.

The German frigates have an L-band SMART-L decimeter radar from the Dutch branch of Thales Nederland, it has outstanding qualities in detecting ballistic missile warheads at altitudes up to 150 km (the target with 0,1 and 2 EPR is detected at an 175 km distance) That already speaks about the partial progress of the new program. The second option should be an increase in the energy potential of the APAR multi-functional radar, which currently, in comparison with the AN / SPY-1A / D radars, does not seriously reach the capabilities of the SM-3 / 6 antimissiles. APAR radar is a full-fledged X-band radar with active phased array (without any separate “radar searchlights” of continuous radiation and illumination), but the target detection range with an effective dispersion surface in 0,1 m2 is only 70-75 km, which is 2,5 times less than the "Idzhisov" MRLS AN / SPY-1A / D. Modernization of the APAR station will bring its technical characteristics to the level of the promising American AMDR radar.


The APAR centimeter multi-function radar station has a great visual resemblance to the Israeli shipborne radar control of the Barak-8 EL / M-2248 MF-STAR ELTA Systems, a subsidiary of the IAI: a similar antenna post with a 4-side active headlamp . Meanwhile, the principles of their work are radically different. While the Israeli station operates in the decimeter S-band, allowing only target designation for the targets for the “radar searchlights” of the millimeter and centimeter EL / M-2221 backlight, the Dutch APAR operates in a full-fledged X-range and can simultaneously capture accurate Auto track to 16 VC


The third step is to update the software and some hardware units of the combat information and control system “Thales SEWACO-FD”, which is responsible for managing the SM-2 shipboard-to-air missile complex on F124 frigates. Now they are equipped with an outdated modification of the SM-2MR Block IIIA (RIM-66M) SAM. The rocket has a range of about 167 km and uses semi-active radar seeker which is more adapted to intercept low-altitude cruise missiles and aerodynamic targets. Accordingly, the Thales SEWACO-FD PIC has standard signal processing modules reflected from these types of air targets. To effectively use the RIM-161B and RIM-174 ERAM SAMs, these devices should receive an auxiliary processor (BSP) type (Ballistic Missile Defense Signal Processor), or a more modern MMSP processor. These processors are built on a more modern and productive elemental base, which makes it possible to detect and select small ballistic objects at times more accurately against the background of the use of promising anti-missile defense systems (KSPPRO).

The MMSP family of processors opens up great prospects for "Ajis" and other combat information and control systems, because it was the first time that the system of the "Aegis BMD 5.0.1" variant was built on the basis of these "cores", combining the possibility of using both RIM-161B / C and multipurpose RIM-174 ERAM. The same processors served as the technological beginning for work on the SBT (Sea-Based Terminal) program. The program is designed to impart partial interchangeability between the SM-3 PR and SM-6 as part of a single ship-based CICS in terms of anti-missile missions. You already know that all variants of the SM-3 interceptor use the specialized kinetic combat stage Mk142 with an ultra-sensitive cooled IR sensor and a high-speed gas-dynamic control system to destroy the ballistic target with a direct hit as an interceptor. The SM-6 anti-aircraft missile does not have such a level, and therefore it was necessary to rely on the capabilities of the new MMSP processors, as well as the more powerful onboard onboard computers, on the ERAM themselves, to intercept ballistic missiles and their warheads. As a result, SM-6 received a very acceptable accuracy of approach to the head of the enemy's BR for undermining the directional high-explosive fragmentation warhead. A similar principle was implemented in the improved MIM-104C SAM of the Patriot PAC-2 complex.

Further upgrading of the RIM-174 ERAM SAM can include the installation of a “gas-dynamic belt” of transverse control engines and the introduction of a high-frequency Ku-band operation of active radar seeker. These measures will lead to the implementation of the concept of "hit-to-kill", which provides for the kinetic destruction of the combat equipment of the enemy’s missile with a direct hit.


The British multi-purpose frigates Type-26 "Global Combat Ship" will receive 2 of launcher-type launchers right away: the first is a vertical modular embedded PU for the highly maneuverable SAM system of the self-defense Sea Ceptor, the second is the universal TLU Mk41 VLS. Thus, the “sensational” “global warships” of the Type-26 British Navy can be armed with the SM-6 SAM. Considering the low energy characteristics of the ship Type-997 “Artisan 3D” radar, it is already possible to say that targeting long-range RIM-174 ERAM in the British KUG / AUG will be carried out by targeting F-5B fighters of the F-35B generation, as well as aircraft DRLOUU E-3D


In a similar way, all surface combat ships of the united NATO Navy in Europe equipped with the UHF Mk41 can be updated, including Dutch and Danish frigates of the classes “De Zeven Provinción” and “Iver Huitfeldt”, the Spanish “Alvaro de Bazan”, and also the Norwegian “Fridtjof Nansen” ". Despite the fact that today there have been no requests for promising Standard-6 from the fleets of these countries, the output for their export, the day before, given to Raytheon by the US Department of Defense, can change the situation very dramatically in the coming years: the demand for SM -6 can significantly exceed all forecasts. And the fact that in recent months, the North Atlantic Alliance has become even more “splitting at the seams” will further stir up interest from the defense departments of small Western European countries to such multipurpose missile weapons. The situation with the possible supply of allied foreign naval forces in the APR and Europe long-range missiles SM-6, capable in the blink of an eye to reincarnate from excellent defensive weapons to offensive, could be one of the most audacious attempts by Washington to shift the global balance of forces in its direction.

Information sources:
http://forum.militaryparitet.com/viewtopic.php?id=12574
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/sm-6/sm-6.shtml
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/news/germaniya-ocenivaet-vozmozhnost-zakupki-zur-sm-3-standart/
Author:
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech
    Same lech 25 January 2017 06: 43
    10
    An urgent article ... the author has well described the state in this area today.
    Now the question is for our army and navy as well as the military-industrial complex of RUSSIA ... what will be the answer to this attack.
    1. ImPerts
      ImPerts 25 January 2017 07: 46
      +1
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      what will be the answer to this attack

      The mace must be brought to mind. Or make a liquid-propellant rocket in Miass with the same dimensions. The size of Boreyev's mines is limited.
      1. kugelblitz
        kugelblitz 25 January 2017 08: 34
        0
        The mace has quality problems rather than construction. By the way, one of the few who can follow a low-ballistic trajectory, so it is slightly inferior to the Trident. However, in a recent incident, the latter is also not ideal.
    2. A jacket
      A jacket 25 January 2017 08: 49
      +4
      Quote: The same Lech
      An urgent article ... the author has well described the state in this area today.
      Now the question is for our army and navy as well as the military-industrial complex of RUSSIA ... what will be the answer to this attack.

      I join: thanks to Evgeny Damantsev for a smart article, objective and informative!
      There would be more such material on VO, with facts and figures, without assumptions and guesses.
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 25 January 2017 10: 38
      +6
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Now the question is for our army and navy as well as the military-industrial complex of RUSSIA ... what will be the answer to this attack.

      Well, a couple of three options come to mind ...
      For example, the Status-6 project, which, as it turned out, is not an empty horror story. Also, KR Caliber in standard containers is the CLUB-K complex.
      In the future, on the approach of the RCC Zircon and Bramos-2. And also, ICBM SARMAT, BOUNDARY (Vanguard) ...
      Is that enough?
      1. Talgat
        Talgat 25 January 2017 18: 26
        +5
        Well, yes, it’s clear that something needs to be answered

        But the article is super +++ which does not once again remind you that the West is super-technological and this is a serious enemy (remember 1941)
    4. LEK
      LEK 26 January 2017 16: 50
      +3
      There is only one answer: to withdraw from the INF Treaty and begin the construction of a huge number of medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads.
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 31 January 2017 12: 41
        0
        Quote: LEK
        There is only one answer: to withdraw from the INF Treaty and begin the construction of a huge number of medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads.

        Is the current quantity insufficient for you?
    5. Analyst
      Analyst 31 January 2017 14: 02
      0
      There is no reception against scrap, so the silent drones should be the answer, which in case of aggression will make the aggressor’s ships nowhere to go to replenish supplies, and then without this material supply all this scrap metal pile will be useful only for fishing.
      "We are peaceful people, but our armored train stands on a siding" - such a song we were forced to teach at school in the mid-80s
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 7 February 2017 16: 21
        0
        Quote: Analyst
        therefore, the answer should be silent drones, which in case of aggression will make the ships of the aggressor

        Almost the same idea came to me: A carrier boat for disposable drones carrying a heavy machine gun or a 20-23 mm cannon. They approach the ships, each to his own goal, pops up and takes out the radar antennas to the adren-fen!
        Where can the rockets then fly?
        They will be additionally sent over the horizon, and not immediately.
        There that will not take off!
  2. Alex_59
    Alex_59 25 January 2017 07: 22
    14
    Far Eastern fleet operators of the new American SM-6 anti-aircraft missiles have a real opportunity in the next few years to drastically change their balance of forces in the Asia-Pacific region.
    No adversary will do as much harm as their own ... well, it’s clear who. Comparisons with our anti-ship missiles would make sense if we were really building something for the Pacific Fleet. New submarines or destroyers. And so ... patrolmen. They that SM-6, that SM-2.
    As you already understood, the radio horizon will not become a big obstacle for this, because in the arsenals of the air forces of Japan, Australia and South Korea there are a sufficient number of Aircraft AWACS E-767S, E-2C, as well as the Boeing-737 AEW & C, which will detect these anti-ship missiles at a distance of 100 — 120 km, and then transmit the coordinates via a direct channel of radio correction directly to the RIM-174 ERAM missiles.
    Taking into account what kind of RCS the AWACS aircraft has, this will become a problem. The active seeker has the disadvantage that it provides the principle of "fire and forget" only for a non-maneuvering target. And for the maneuvering task, constant correction of the flight task from the outside (from the same AWACS aircraft) is required and the transfer of these data to the SAM. Since the RCS of an AWACS aircraft is several times larger than the RCS of an anti-ship missile system, we can assume that such an aircraft near our shores is always a corpse. On the high seas, of course, the situation is different, submarines that autonomously launched an attack on the AUG far from our shores cannot count on the help of aviation and their own air defense. But such attacks have been quite suicidal before. The AUG strike was always planned to be complex.
    In principle, in order to create serious problems for SM-6, our people need to implement two things - to make anti-ship missiles maneuvering according to a random law, and to cover forces attacking AOGs with surface vehicles with similar SAMs (like 40Н6). In this case, the AWACS aircraft is removed from the agenda by these same 40H6 missiles, and without it the SM-6 will not be able to do anything against maneuvering anti-ship missiles. Another question is that this is all a theory. Even XRMX-based TFRs have been built for us for years.
    1. ancient
      ancient 25 January 2017 14: 58
      +4
      Quote: Alex_59
      (like 40H6).


      There was only one little thing left to do .... to make it (well, in the sense that it would fly, for real, and not in "urya-articles" and slogans).
      And to solve the problem .. so what will happen .. or Polement and Redoubt or all the same ... nevermind? wassat
  3. kugelblitz
    kugelblitz 25 January 2017 07: 34
    +3
    Of course, I understand everything, AGSN, high-altitude trajectory, all things. But how is over-target designation carried out? How does a small antenna manage to highlight subtle targets without backlighting? And how can a small warhead be destroyed, say a surface target? There are a lot of ambiguities that the Penguin indicates the goals are similar to advertising, after all, this is not a plane AWACS. AIM-120C-7 is an ordinary aircraft missile, with a very ordinary good seeker, by the way low maneuverability just comes from it seems to me. And then some kind of fierce prodigy comes out. Starting by the way, because of the trajectory, you can also track the radar of an enemy ship. Very reminiscent of all this is the early Western anti-ship missiles based on anti-aircraft missiles, such as Sea Killer.

    IMHO: you should not try to merge a rhino with a bulldog, in the end RCCs should be optimized specifically for breaking through and defeating surface targets, and air defense systems for destroying airborne ones. For it turns out a low-maneuverable dear monster, poorly intercepting both maneuvering air targets, and not powerful enough to destroy ships. If we consider it as an air defense system, then the complex itself should consist of several types of missiles, a highly maneuverable near one with telecontrol like Tor-M2, cheap enough by the way, and a distant hand from heavy ones with an AGSN, where the whistle transponders are justified. A defeat of surface targets only as a bonus.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 25 January 2017 11: 19
      +2
      "There are a lot of ambiguities that the Penguin specifies targets like an advertisement,
      after all, this is not an AWACS aircraft with a circular view "///

      Oh, finally they began to understand what the F-35 "Pregnant Penguin", "Flying Pig", etc. are. fellow good
      With its own extremely low visibility, it is able to replace for target designation
      huge in size and EPR and vulnerable to the enemy aircraft AWACS.
      1. kugelblitz
        kugelblitz 25 January 2017 11: 35
        +3
        Quote: voyaka uh
        With its own extremely low visibility, it is able to replace for target designation

        I understand everything, but he has no all-round radar. In general, I understand SM-6 precisely as a missile defense system against warheads flying to the owner, at the same time as as anti-satellite. That is why such weight, maneuverability and range. And enties are twisted no more than to adapt the tank for plowing and transporting passengers.
      2. Alex_59
        Alex_59 25 January 2017 12: 03
        +3
        Quote: voyaka uh
        With its own extremely low visibility, it is able to replace for target designation
        huge in size and EPR and vulnerable to the enemy aircraft AWACS.

        Very funny tactics. Such an expensive and complex piece of iron, like the F-35 is just an inconspicuous target designator? If he sees a cruise missile - why bother with some sort of target designation, if this prodigy must itself bring down what it sees. Is it designed to intercept air targets (including)? Or is he not capable of this? Somehow it reminds children in a sandbox when an offended child calls his dad to pacify the bully, although in theory he has everything to independently give the offender an eye.
        Quote: voyaka uh
        With its own extremely low visibility, it is able to replace for target designation
        huge in size and EPR and vulnerable to the enemy aircraft AWACS.

        Imagine the F-360e's 35-degree cutting circles, in all missile-prone directions. Let's call this tactic the "pregnant penguin carousel" good
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 25 January 2017 15: 01
          +3
          "A very funny tactic" ////

          Of course, funny. A plane not seen by radars induces a system
          ABM ships from their ACG to the enemy’s anti-ship missiles at a large approach distance.
          Chuckle ...

          "Let's call this tactic" carousel of pregnant penguins "////

          Name the cat as you wish, if only to catch mice ... wink
          1. ADmA_RUS
            ADmA_RUS 25 January 2017 16: 35
            +7
            The "invisible" plane will become very visible as soon as it starts illuminating targets.
          2. sentaniel
            sentaniel 25 January 2017 16: 46
            +1
            you didn’t tell a stealth plane and an invisible plane by accident? )))
            1. ADmA_RUS
              ADmA_RUS 25 January 2017 18: 25
              +3
              I don’t confuse anything.
              1. Have you seen the quotes?
              2. Stealth is largely a question of "what", not "how."
              3. In some battle scenarios, an airplane built using stealth technology can gain an advantage. But as soon as the radar activates, he will completely lose them.
          3. Winnie76
            Winnie76 25 January 2017 18: 32
            +4
            Little invisible penguins will soar for hours in the air and illuminate everything around with their invisible radar. And when they see something interesting, they immediately turn on their invisible link-16 and send an invisible MMS with coordinates to an invisible boat that launches an invisible racket.
            Warrior, did I understand correctly?
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh 26 January 2017 09: 45
              +2
              "Warrior, did I understand correctly?" ////

              You begin to cut into the network-centric war of the future using
              radio stealth, aircraft, missiles and ships.
              Congratulations, progress! fellow good
              1. Ramzai
                Ramzai 9 August 2017 08: 30
                0
                Quote: voyaka uh
                You begin to cut into the network-centric war of the future using
                radio stealth, aircraft, missiles and ships.

                So big, but believe in fairy tales.
          4. DM51
            DM51 25 January 2017 20: 05
            +4
            Quote: voyaka uh
            "A very funny tactic" ////

            Of course, funny. A plane not seen by radars induces a system
            ABM ships from their ACG to the enemy’s anti-ship missiles at a large approach distance.
            Chuckle ...

            "Let's call this tactic" carousel of pregnant penguins "////

            Name the cat as you wish, if only to catch mice ... wink

            Do you rush directly with this invisibility of the F-35, that is, if they see him, then he will not have any more trump cards? "Penguin" is invisible until it emits anything, but how does it then find the target and transfer it to the missile launcher? And I am 100% sure that the F-35, even in radio silence mode, perfectly see the radars and the Favorite, and even more so the Polymer-Redut, God willing, this complex will be brought to mind
            1. Walanin
              Walanin 1 May 2017 23: 30
              0
              Quote: DM51
              And I am 100% sure that the F-35 even in the radio silence mode can see radar and Favorite, and especially Polymer-Redoubt

              if only the curvature of the earth did not interfere .. What are you going to bring down?
    2. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 January 2017 12: 45
      0
      Quote: kugelblitz
      But how is over-target designation carried out?

      Lacrosse-5 satellite for example
  4. Siberian
    Siberian 25 January 2017 08: 35
    0
    Well, you have to rely on Zircons
    1. Free Shooter
      Free Shooter 25 January 2017 10: 11
      +7
      It’s ridiculous to rely on what isn’t there. But when they will be adopted, then it will be possible to count.
  5. Free Shooter
    Free Shooter 25 January 2017 10: 10
    +7
    This once again suggests that it is time for Putin to stop spending money on Rublev Mercedes and to seriously pay attention to industry and the army. Otherwise, Vova will play out before Tsushima.
  6. ADmA_RUS
    ADmA_RUS 25 January 2017 14: 57
    0
    Strange article.
    The author scares a rocket on which there were no requests.
    Strange rocket.
    A rocket that does everything badly.
    Starting mass of one and a half tons, as it were, hints that making a strong badabum will not work.
  7. andrey682006
    andrey682006 25 January 2017 15: 11
    +5
    If the AWACS directs this SM-6, then would it not be a countermeasure to jam the AWACS of some kind of electronic warfare of the ship's "Krasukha" type.
    If F-35 will be used as an AWAC and guidance, will he not unmask himself like that? After all, he needs to transmit a correction signal to SM-6? Moreover, he must introduce a correction constantly, before the rocket hits the target. Given the speed and range of the SM-6, it will be one to two to three minutes. He himself will be the target for this time.
    1. Walanin
      Walanin 1 May 2017 23: 34
      0
      In one or two minutes, it is physically impossible to bring him down at such distances. Well, unlike conventional AWACS penguins, there are really a lot of penguins and they are not defenseless sheep at all.
      Quote: andrey682006
      Moreover, he must introduce a correction constantly, before the rocket hits the target.

      should not. Correction is needed only until the capture of the ARGSN anti-missile target.
  8. gaudin
    gaudin 25 January 2017 23: 51
    +1
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    Now the question is for our army and navy as well as the military-industrial complex of RUSSIA ... what will be the answer to this attack.

    The answer was invented back in the USSR, the use of special ammunition to break through enemy air defense and missile defense.
  9. Octopus
    Octopus 26 January 2017 01: 42
    +1
    Hmm.
    In the headline - the article was written by another crazy person.

    And in the text - people, at least in the subject. So the article is a plus.

    Still, the author could learn to write two articles at once (one in a section, God forgive me, Analytics - about "geopolitics", the second in "Arms" - about technology), it would be very good.
  10. Pilat2009
    Pilat2009 19 June 2017 21: 22
    0
    Quote: LEK
    in a huge number of medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads.

    The question is whether there will be enough will to apply them. In our country, half of the children of the leadership abroad live
  11. Pilat2009
    Pilat2009 19 June 2017 21: 40
    0
    Quote: Free Shooter
    Vova will play to Tsushima.

    Wait for Tsushima and there will not be enough ships. But how do you imagine the confrontation between Russia and the whole world? Even theoretically, we will not be able to rivet as many ships