An agreement was signed on expanding the base of the logistics of the Russian Navy in Tartus

48
It became known that Russia and Syria reached an agreement on expanding the material-technical center of the Russian Navy in Tartus. The Russian Navy will be able to accommodate up to 11 ships for various purposes at the same time in the Syrian port. From the message:

This agreement is valid for 49 years and is automatically extended for subsequent 25-year periods if none of the parties notifies the other party in writing through diplomatic channels of its intention to terminate it for at least one year before the expiration of the next period. The maximum number of warships in the Russian Federation that are allowed to stay at the logistics point at the same time is 11 units, including warships with a nuclear power plant, subject to nuclear and environmental safety.




An agreement was signed on expanding the base of the logistics of the Russian Navy in Tartus


The word "nuclear" has particularly strongly affected the "partners". From the message about the expansion of the MTO base in Tartus, this very word was pulled out, and notes began to appear on the western information platforms, misinterpreting the essence of the concluded agreements. In the notes - to readers who are not used to getting acquainted with information from different sources, Western “adherents of freedom of speech” announce that Russia is on the path of “nuclear expansion”. According to the same logic, any country in the world that uses ships with nuclear power plants is engaged in “nuclear expansion” ...

It should be noted that during the 49-year period, the MTO base in Tartus will act solely on the basis of Russian jurisdiction. Syria provides the base area for use free of charge.
  • ИноСМИ
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    20 January 2017 17: 57
    Now I love you, now I praise you, finally you ....., Moydodyr pleased!
    1. +12
      20 January 2017 18: 07
      Here's what is interesting, why, a man who spent most of his life in charge of extinguishing fires and raking debris shows such a logical state thinking, and the "effective manager" Serdyukov with his panel girls plundered the entire defense of our country?
      1. +6
        20 January 2017 18: 16
        The word "nuclear" had a particularly strong effect on "partners."


        Yes, let them hysteria or read to the end and correctly, and so we must solve our problems and all.
      2. +6
        20 January 2017 18: 22
        Quote: Zibelew
        the person who directed the suppression of fires most of his life and raked up the rubble shows such logical state thinking ...

        Not extinguishing and raking ... but creating and organizing a structure, system. And why, having created one structure, he will not be able to reorganize another?
        1. +1
          20 January 2017 20: 39
          Quote: Homo
          And why, having created one structure, he will not be able to reorganize another?


          Please pay attention to the very effective structure! Without any quotes. Russian Defense Ministry - this will be the second. Therefore, a person knows the principle of creation ... You can’t afford to rub it, as they say ...
          1. +1
            21 January 2017 01: 16
            Quote: Jovanni
            Please pay attention to the very effective structure! Without any quotes.

            Please explain, if it is not difficult for you, what is the effectiveness of the Ministry of Emergencies.
            1. +3
              21 January 2017 08: 02
              You are welcome. Fires are extinguished, people are saved and found. In case of large-scale disasters, the forces of the Ministry of Emergencies are deployed promptly. In the rubble, professionals work with the necessary skills and equipment, and not soldiers conscripts in half with volunteer neighbors. Medical assistance can be provided both on the spot and in the center where, if necessary, the injured can be delivered by the Ministry of Emergencies. For serious accidents the first in our city employees of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. The list can be significantly continued ...
              1. +2
                21 January 2017 10: 31
                Quote: Jovanni
                You are welcome. Fires are extinguished, people are saved and

                I won't surprise you very much if I say that 90% of what you described has nothing to do with the Emergencies Ministry? Medical aid - disaster medicine or simply ambulance crews, fires are extinguished by GPS, the debris is dismantled by the ACC rescuers, the traffic police and the staff of the PSC are the first to arrive at an accident. And the Ministry of Emergency Situations is far from them. On the overalls of the above-mentioned regional services, as a rule, it is written "Ministry of Emergencies" for solidity. And after a while, the Emergencies Ministry's task force arrives to show its presence and take pictures, and then report to the management on the progress of the work. Continue the "tangible list"? I do not mislead you, because I work there myself Yes
                1. 0
                  21 January 2017 18: 49
                  Sorry to deviate from your topic - but I wanted to return to the main topic

                  Still, recognize the main interest in Syria with Iran - it is a matter of life and death for him - and the Russian Federation has only a strategy for deploying a fleet and keeping Iran alive

                  T e is all a grandiose gift to Iran - because imagine that there would be no Russia
                  and Iran would have to -
                  1) Fighting in Syria Alone
                  2) Create a Tartus base yourself and try to rivet 8-10 Jamaran frigates - to fill the base and create a presence in the Mediterranean Sea \
                  3) Moreover, with all his efforts - most likely the aggressors would have defeated Syria and attacked (most likely successfully) Iran itself

                  I hope that Iran understands all this
        2. +1
          21 January 2017 08: 06
          Quote: Homo
          at. And why, having created one structure, he will not be able to reorganize another?

          Creating from scratch is much easier than redoing an existing one.
          1. +3
            21 January 2017 08: 41
            on the expansion of the MTO base of the Russian Navy in Tartus

            What to expand?

            What is a fleet without ships? Black Sea Fleet - 1 more or less modern frigate, and 35-year-old RCR "Moscow". Everything!

            Expand gathered
      3. +2
        20 January 2017 18: 35
        The "effective" task was different. Together with the girls, "reform" - crush the old army. They demolished everything. Overdid it. Now Shoigu brings the new structure back to normal.
      4. +3
        20 January 2017 19: 03
        Quote: Zibelew
        "Effective manager" Serdyukov with his panel girls plundered the entire defense of our country?

        Serdyukov is a small pickpocket in comparison with the neighbors from non-wintering. Here there is the scale of theft, so the scale. They rake everything up to the well-worn footcloths.
      5. +9
        20 January 2017 19: 30
        Quote: Zibelew
        Here's what is interesting, why, a man who spent most of his life in charge of extinguishing fires and raking debris shows such a logical state thinking, and the "effective manager" Serdyukov with his panel girls plundered the entire defense of our country?

        Hehe hehe ... so the man who directed most of his life to extinguish fires and rake up rubble now fighting with weapons purchased during the time of the furniture maker, and armed forces reformed by the furniture maker. By the way, purchases of the Su-34 are still under the contract of the Serdyukov era.
        If Serdyukov had really plundered the defense of the whole country, then we would still have an army of the model of the war in South Ossetia: "bald" T-62, T-72 of the Soviet release, BMP-1, expired ATGM and soldiers in "form No. 8 "in platoons of 16-20 people.
        And the Air Force, capable of missing 90% of ammunition dropped, even for a stationary target the size of a runway.
        1. +9
          20 January 2017 19: 47
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Quote: Zibelew
          Here's what is interesting, why, a man who spent most of his life in charge of extinguishing fires and raking debris shows such a logical state thinking, and the "effective manager" Serdyukov with his panel girls plundered the entire defense of our country?

          Hehe hehe ... so the man who directed most of his life to extinguish fires and rake up rubble now fighting with weapons purchased during the time of the furniture maker, and armed forces reformed by the furniture maker. By the way, purchases of the Su-34 are still under the contract of the Serdyukov era.
          If Serdyukov had really plundered the defense of the whole country, then we would still have an army of the model of the war in South Ossetia: "bald" T-62, T-72 of the Soviet release, BMP-1, expired ATGM and soldiers in "form No. 8 "in platoons of 16-20 people.
          And the Air Force, capable of missing 90% of ammunition dropped, even for a stationary target the size of a runway.

          You wrote everything correctly .... Serdyukov a thief, of course, but he was sleeping on a woman! Enough to slander him already ... The Army and the Navy just so abruptly cannot suddenly change, everyone worked on it and Serdyukov also made a contribution (under the leadership of course)
        2. 0
          20 January 2017 23: 18
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Air Force capable of missing 90% of ammunition dropped even for a stationary target the size of a runway.

          But for this they beat him in the face without asking for a name!
          1. 0
            21 January 2017 10: 34
            Quote: non-primary
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Air Force capable of missing 90% of ammunition dropped even for a stationary target the size of a runway.

            But for this they beat him in the face without asking for a name!

            Exactly, for a miss on the runway you have to beat your face! angry
      6. The comment was deleted.
  2. +1
    20 January 2017 17: 57
    We would also return to Cuba, both to Nicaragua and to Angola, as in glorious Soviet times, only on different conditions, and in general it is time to give the whole planet that we are a real superpower with our interests and values.
    1. +5
      20 January 2017 18: 44
      why?))) and at whose expense?)))
      1. 0
        20 January 2017 18: 55
        cariperpaint -to keep the enemy in constant tension, pushing the threat away from our land. And at whose expense, it is possible and necessary to develop mutually beneficial cooperation, earn money, it will pay.
        1. AUL
          +1
          20 January 2017 20: 31
          to keep the enemy in constant tension, pushing the threat away from our land

          Mr. exile, and you do not find that keeping the enemy in constant tension is not the best way to move the threat away from your country? Wouldn't it be safer to establish normal relations with him?
          And distances do not currently play a special role. Missiles - they fly fast!
          1. +2
            21 January 2017 06: 34
            Quote from AUL
            Wouldn't it be safer to establish normal relations with him?

            Your option is very good, only the enemy somehow doesn’t want just such a relationship ... unfortunately!
    2. +1
      20 January 2017 19: 05
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      We would also return to Cuba, and to Nicaragua, and to Angola

      In Syria, Assad’s home helps him gain a foothold there. Without our support, he would not have survived.
      When the state voluntarily lets in a foreign army, it directs either material calculation or a clear threat to the state. The Soviet Union gave these countries a comprehensive development model, and even in a beautiful wrapper.
      Nothing explicitly threatens all of these Cubes --- therefore, it is more profitable for these countries to pursue a multi-vector policy, since we will not be able to cover all their inevitable costs.
      In my opinion, we need to focus on the perimeter of our borders, on our former republics. NATO is trying to gain a foothold in Ukraine, is beginning to carry out an orange "roll-over" to Belarus, this is what we need to do and use our limited resources for this.
      1. +1
        21 January 2017 08: 10
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        In Syria, Assad’s home helps him gain a foothold there. Without our support, he would not have survived.

        He will not stand in any case
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        When the state voluntarily lets in a foreign army, it directs either material calculation or a clear threat to the state.

        No, this says only one thing - not the desire of their own citizens to defend the existing government

        Quote: Thunderbolt
        The Soviet Union gave these countries a comprehensive development model, and even in a beautiful wrapper.

        Well, bring me so vividly at least one country where it succeeded and did not remain just a beautiful wrapper of slogans.
    3. 0
      21 January 2017 06: 27
      And in Angola, what to do, bombing penguins?
  3. 0
    20 January 2017 17: 57
    That's good. We need to project our strength onto the Mediterranean Sea .. Well, if not now, then in ten years ..
  4. +1
    20 January 2017 17: 57
    Thank God..! It’s expensive, but politically it’s strengthening Russia in the Middle East, we can’t leave from there .. And we will establish the world there, we will trade mutually beneficial ..
  5. +2
    20 January 2017 17: 57
    11 units, including warships with a nuclear power plant, subject to nuclear and environmental safety.

    Now our "partners" will say that the Russians have created an aspen nest in the Mediterranean! After all, this base will now be like a bone in their throat! They have such a foothold as a sickle ... After all, from such a position the entrance to the Black Sea will be locked! hi
  6. +4
    20 January 2017 18: 08
    automatically renewed for subsequent 25-year periods, if neither side not less than one year before the expiration of the next period notifies the other party in writing through diplomatic channels of its intention to terminate it.
    And then they will politely ask us - implicitly, the descendants of Assad will figure out, why do we need someone else's base? we are independent, if you please. So it was with Vietnam, something similar with Cuba will be in Syria. It is necessary without any rent .... shed a Russian soldier for you krovushka? sent the Syrian expresses? Kindly - forever share a piece of land, like England and Gibraltar - for 300 years! and do not blow into the mustache. Otherwise, these endless feeding of friendly regimes will forever be like a bottomless barrel, but for thanks only fools help, like the Union, which helped the world half the world and remained at the trough, and besides, now part of us is barking differently. A few kilometers into eternal property - and it’s already interest .... otherwise the soldiers will die for the darma ..... our ancestors washed Europe with their blood from slavery and now they’re spitting for it ....
    1. +2
      20 January 2017 18: 26
      Child, you absolutely do not know the story! And there - Vangovat!
    2. 0
      20 January 2017 19: 34
      Quote: Novel 11
      And then they will politely ask us - implicitly, the descendants of Assad will figure out, why do we need someone else's base?

      - in 49 years? "Not everyone will survive" (c)
      - and for half a century, a lot of things that in the world have time to change ...
    3. 0
      21 January 2017 08: 11
      Quote: Novel 11
      And then they will politely ask us - implicitly, the descendants of Assad will figure out, why do we need someone else's base?

      To conclude agreements with Assad - to deceive yourself
  7. +2
    20 January 2017 18: 16
    Took Turkey in two fires.
  8. +1
    20 January 2017 18: 40
    Quote: Novel 11

    And then they will politely ask us - implicitly, the descendants of Assad will figure out, why do we need someone else's base? we are independent, if you please.

    And after more than 40 years, either the donkey will die, or the padishah will die! In the meantime, this is for us !!!
  9. +2
    20 January 2017 19: 04
    So, so, this is not Cuba for you, but "the second Crimea ?!"

    Guys, forgive me for such "humor"!
  10. +1
    20 January 2017 19: 40
    The Russian Navy will be able to place in the Syrian port at the same time up to 11 ships for various purposes ...

    - this, of course, is all very, very cool ...
    - but still physically expand this base would not hurt Yes
    - otherwise "11 ships", and even "with a nuclear power plant", simply will not squeeze into the existing water area request

    1. 0
      20 January 2017 21: 08
      And it seems to me that the quote
      Russia and Syria reached an agreement on expanding the material and technical base of the Russian Navy in Tartus. The Russian Navy will be able to place in the Syrian port at the same time up to 11 ships for various purposes
      - it just speaks about it!
      1. +1
        20 January 2017 21: 58
        "" "After the modernization of the infrastructure, the Russian naval base in Syrian Tartus will be able to receive ships of the first rank, including aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines, Viktor Ozerov, head of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, told RIA Novosti."
    2. 0
      20 January 2017 21: 34
      So far, there is the 720th point of logistics of the Russian Navy.
      БUdet base -will expand !!
  11. +1
    20 January 2017 20: 03
    The United States has lowered, now it would be up to Israel ... They say they are untouchable, in the region and in the world ..?
  12. +3
    20 January 2017 20: 04
    Russia and Syria reached an agreement on expanding the material and technical base of the Russian Navy in Tartus. The Russian Navy will be able to place in the Syrian port at the same time up to 11 ships for various purposes


    At the PMTO of the Russian Navy:
    In autumn 2015, the Russian side carried out dredging and expansion of the mooring front of the 720th PMTO in Tartus. On October 4, 2016, the official representative of the Ministry of Defense Igor Konashenkov told reporters that the "naval base in Tartus" and the ships of the Mediterranean squadron located in the coastal zone will be covered from the air by the battery of the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system delivered to Syria.
    (http://tass.ru/info/3695196)
    The Russian Ministry of Defense began preparing documents (October 2016) that will allow the creation of a permanent naval base in Syrian Tartus. The relevant documents are currently prepared (October 2016), they undergo an interdepartmental approval process. The degree of readiness of the documents in question is “quite high”. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said he "welcomes the expansion of Russia's presence in the Eastern Mediterranean" (http://izvestia.ru/news/637298)
    Moscow. January 20th. INTERFAX.RU - The S-300 surface-to-air missile systems and the Bastion coastal missile systems will provide defense of the Russian Navy's post in the Syrian port of Tartus. "In the future, on the territory used by the Russian Navy, two new piers will be built, intended for mooring ships with a displacement of over 10 thousand tons, as well as a complex of residential and administrative buildings," the source said. (http://www.interfax.ru/world/546283)

    Now tell the peace-loving NATO bloc (I won’t be surprised if there is an airdrome with a 3 m runway there) that the agreement indicates the deployment of a PMTO in Syria, it will probably be the only PMTO on our planet covered by such forces, British Gibraltar will probably cry. ..

    Russia is a kind country ...
  13. Maz
    +7
    20 January 2017 20: 09
    Quote: Zibelew
    Here's what is interesting, why, a man who spent most of his life in charge of extinguishing fires and raking debris shows such a logical state thinking, and the "effective manager" Serdyukov with his panel girls plundered the entire defense of our country?

    No, not all. Serdyukov performed some other mission. He covered the development of the industries, weapons and scientific work we needed most from the caustic gaze of partners, creating a large, nasty, but not real cloud of smoke screen around the Army, the military-industrial complex and the navy so great that even we believed, not like these vile non-humans from NATO and the USA. But "suddenly" we had polite people, and equipment, and Armata, and T-50, and "Kuzya" began to smoke, and we jammed the barmaleev in Syria, and Atlantic, and boats are thrown with clubs. Or do you think Shoigu did all this in a couple of years? Each has its own time.
  14. Maz
    +2
    20 January 2017 20: 14
    It’s time, and then all the scum French and American hangs in the Mediterranean and interferes with work and work out of barmaley
  15. 0
    20 January 2017 20: 36
    Syria is our outpost!
    Personally, I am proud that the Syrians invited us to fight ISIS terrorists!
    1. 0
      20 January 2017 20: 56
      Quote: Sergey F
      Personally, I’m proud that the Syrians invited us to fight ISIS terrorists!

  16. 0
    20 January 2017 20: 43
    Among other things, the word "gratuitous" is very happy ...
  17. 0
    20 January 2017 21: 13
    And the beach not far from the base must also be in a contract for 50 years. Get settled so get settled. Somewhere between the Tigris and the Euphrates, Paradise was generally ...
  18. 0
    20 January 2017 22: 41
    After all that Russia has done for Syria, the fact of expanding the base of the Russian Navy's MTO in Tartus may be of a notification nature.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"