What will cover the northern bastions of Russia

18
What will cover the northern bastions of Russia


In the coming years, the Russian Ministry of Defense will focus on the development of military infrastructure in the Arctic zone and the Kuril Islands. This was repeatedly stated by Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu. In particular, it is planned to deploy two new coastal defense compounds in the coastal areas of the Northern Sea Route.



According to Izvestia, their task is to ensure the safety of sections of the route and the coast adjacent to it. It is assumed that new military units are planned to be created on the Kola Peninsula on the basis of the coastal forces of the North fleet.

Geographical difference

According to Tass military observer Viktor Litovkin, coastal defense formations created in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation may have a different composition depending on the place of their deployment and the tasks assigned to them.

It’s one thing - the coastal defense division in the Crimea, where the weather is relatively warm even in winter, can be composed of tank, motorized rifle, artillery (self-propelled and towed guns), anti-aircraft missile units and subunits, as well as reconnaissance, communications, engineering and sapper, defense against weapons mass destruction ... And of course, the divisions of anti-ship complexes "Ball" and "Bastion"
Viktor Litovkin
TASS military commentator


One of the tasks of the Crimean coastal defense brigade is to protect the Black Sea Fleet bases and the coast from amphibious assault forces and the possible attack of the "enemy" from land. In 2016, it became known about the creation of the same compound in the north of the country.

Another thing (in comparison with the Crimea. - Approx. TASS) - a similar division in Chukotka. It is difficult to imagine that such a compound should have tanks that will be covered with multimeter snow in the winter and immobilized, and in the summer they will sink in the mossy tundra. Similarly, self-propelled or towed artillery guns and mobile long-range anti-aircraft missile systems. They also need to create serious conditions for movement on local roads, or rather, on the road
Viktor Litovkin
TASS military commentator


The expert believes that, perhaps, the anti-landing, anti-sabotage units, combined into battalions and companies, will move across the tundra in the winter and summer on quad bikes, articulated snowmobiles or light armored multi-purpose armored personnel carriers, reinforced with heavy machine guns, grenade launchers and flamethrowers.

Short-range air defense systems should also be placed on articulated snowmobiles or their analogs - both the Tor-М2 and Pantsir-С1 complexes are manufactured in modular versions and can be placed on any transport base, including articulated snowmobiles.

Another thing - the C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems. They need stationary platforms, as, indeed, for the Ball and Bastion complexes. Their task is to block the firing capabilities of the Bering Strait so that foreign warships with missile defense systems and long-range cruise missiles do not pass through it towards the West. It seems that such a task is on the shoulder
Viktor Litovkin
TASS military commentator


Cover Siberia



According to Litovkin, approximately the same tasks will be performed by parts of the coastal defense on the Kola Peninsula and the adjacent archipelagoes of the Arctic and on the individual islands of the Kuril Ridge.

Again, depending on the location and the tasks assigned to them, they can be of very different composition. But the main thing is to ensure the protection of Russian territory and our national interests in the western, arctic and far eastern (pacific) direction, by the way, the Syrian coast too, from uninvited “guests” with their rocket systems threatening the Russian deterrent systems of the likely aggressor.
Viktor Litovkin
TASS military commentator


The expert also believes that the matter is not only in ensuring the safety of the Northern Sea Route, which for our country can become “something like the Suez Canal for Egypt”, passing through caravans of ships with cargo from Asia, Australia and the west coast of North America for Europe, maintenance and the protection of this beneficial route from all sides, but also to protect the natural resources in the waters of the Arctic Ocean.

The main thing is to secure the combat positions of our strategic missile forces from the north in Siberia. Solving this problem will not only be part of the coastal defense, but also pilots, border guards, sailors - on surface ships and submarines, EW and radar units, optical and technical reconnaissance, others, as well as airborne units on duty, Rosgvardia ... In short, work, which should be comprehensive, multi-layered and versatile, enough for everyone
Viktor Litovkin
TASS military commentator


In 2016, it became known that the Ball and Bastion anti-ship missile systems were deployed on the Iturup and Kunashir islands in the Kuril Islands. These units are part of the 2014 coastal missile brigade of the Pacific Fleet formed in 72 year. In Kamchatka, the calculations of the Pantsir-С1 complex were taken up for combat duty.

The coastal missile system "Bastion" is equipped with supersonic P-800 "Onyx" missiles ("Yakhont" is an export version. - Approx. TASS). He is able to destroy surface ships of various classes and types. One complex, the ammunition of which can include up to 36 missiles, is able to protect more than 600 km of the coast.

The Ball, armed with subsonic low-altitude X-35 anti-ship missiles, is capable of eliminating enemy’s ground and surface targets at a distance of about 130 km. X-35 is able to destroy ships with a displacement of up to 5000 tons. The rocket can be used in simple and complex weather conditions, day and night, in the conditions of fire and electronic countermeasures of the enemy.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    21 January 2017 09: 07
    It is necessary to secure legally Arctic shelves for Russia, and also fight for Russia's exclusive right to permit movement along the NSR (this is its economic zone)

    For this, we need an army on the northern borders, as well as a powerful Arctic fleet.
  2. 0
    21 January 2017 09: 17
    Whatever the adversaries would think !!!
  3. +6
    21 January 2017 09: 38
    Another thing - the C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems. They need stationary platforms, as, indeed, for the Ball and Bastion complexes. Their task is to block the firing capabilities of the Bering Strait so that foreign warships with missile defense systems and long-range cruise missiles do not pass through it towards the West. It seems that such a task is on the shoulder

    It looks like Litovkin has "creative stagnation". of course you can place everything. In Anadyr, even the "regiment" was deploying strategic missiles. But his phrase about "not allowing passage ...." is sheer stupidity. Is he going to fire at ships with these weapons systems in American territorial waters ????


    Quote: Olgovich
    It is necessary to secure legally Arctic shelves for Russia, and also fight for Russia's exclusive right to permit movement along the NSR (this is its economic zone)

    You are trying to reconcile the incompatible. As it used to be in verse, the zapach is "a horse and a quivering doe". Fighting for the legal consolidation of the Arctic shelf is one thing. We cannot fight for the exclusive right of permission to pass - neither physically, nor legally. This, sorry, is outside our territorial waters in the vast majority of cases. And the NSR itself is not a railway with one track. There are many variations. The only fee we charge is icebreaker. If you have your own icebreaker, you can move without ours. so with the exclusive right is past

    A powerful Arctic fleet is primarily an icebreaking fleet. And the icebreaker fleet of Russia in comparison with the icebreaker fleet of the USSR - tears
    1. +1
      21 January 2017 12: 18
      Is he going to shell ships with these weapons systems in American territorial waters ????

      If you have to fight with the United States, then yes, they will.

      The only collection we take is icebreaking. There is an icebreaker - you can move without ours. so with exclusive right - it's past
      A powerful Arctic fleet is primarily an icebreaking fleet. And the icebreaker fleet of Russia in comparison with the icebreaker fleet of the USSR - tears


      Compared to the USSR, tears can be, although 6 nuclear-powered icebreakers can hardly be called tears, they are also building a few.
      But other countries, including the United States, have nothing similar. Cold itself and ice will make the NSR Russian; we are the only ones who have the capacity to go through the ice.
    2. +2
      21 January 2017 12: 28
      Quote: Old26
      It looks like Litovkin has "creative stagnation". of course you can place everything. In Anadyr, even the "regiment" was deploying strategic missiles.

      ... was the deal! Moreover, the P-14 missiles are ground, not even mine. Hop airfield with RTB. Plus for cover - a motorized rifle division with a tank regiment, air defense missiles!

      As for - stationary systems - anti-ship missiles and air defense ...
      Still, they should be of the PGRK type, but with several points of permanent deployment in the form of insulated Krones. Those. capable of "shooting" both from the main / reserve PPD, and from any other place where it may be necessary to relocate. This is to ensure "survivability" and the closure of "dangerous directions" ....
    3. +1
      23 January 2017 23: 19
      It looks like Litovkin has "creative stagnation".


      This is called dementia. Especially touches:

      The expert believes that, perhaps, the anti-landing, anti-sabotage units, combined into battalions and companies, will move across the tundra in the winter and summer on quad bikes, articulated snowmobiles or light armored multi-purpose armored personnel carriers, reinforced with heavy machine guns, grenade launchers and flamethrowers.


      It is immediately evident that the Expedi has never been to the tundra in winter. And especially in summer ..... Who's reading bedtime stories to children?
  4. +1
    21 January 2017 13: 19
    Quote: Every


    Compared to the USSR, tears can be, although 6 nuclear-powered icebreakers can hardly be called tears, they are also building a few.
    But other countries, including the United States, have nothing similar.


    Because it is who the fuck it is. Or, scientifically, there is no economic feasibility.
    1. 0
      21 January 2017 13: 37
      Quote: Deck
      Because it is who the fuck it is. Or, scientifically, there is no economic feasibility.

      ... others just have no Arctic economic zones! ; ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))=))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))).
      1. 0
        21 January 2017 18: 26
        Canada, USA, Denmark and Norway do not count?
  5. +2
    21 January 2017 13: 20
    Quote: Every
    If you have to fight with the United States, then yes, they will.

    If we fight, the first thing the Americans will do is try to "take out" all these complexes

    Quote: Every
    Compared to the USSR, tears can be, although 6 nuclear-powered icebreakers can hardly be called tears, they are also building a few.
    But other countries, including the United States, have nothing similar. Cold itself and ice will make the NSR Russian; we are the only ones who have the capacity to go through the ice.

    The icebreaker fleet of the USSR is far from being only a nuclear fleet. But also a large number of diesel-electric for various purposes and displacement. As for the nuclear industry - yes they are building, some are building, others we will write off. Nothing like icebreakers? Well no. And they do not need it. A certain amount is, which is enough. The fact that we have capacities now does not mean that others will not have the same capacities, even if there will be less, but they will be - this is enough.

    Quote: Rus2012
    As for - stationary systems - anti-ship missiles and air defense ...
    Still, they should be of the PGRK type, but with several points of permanent deployment in the form of insulated Krones. Those. capable of "shooting" both from the main / reserve PPD, and from any other place where it may be necessary to relocate. This is to ensure "survivability" and the closure of "dangerous directions" ....

    It looks like Litovkin just wrote "clumsily", meaning stationary sites for deployment and launching from these complexes, and not that they are stationary
  6. +2
    21 January 2017 13: 34
    On the instructions of the Government, a group of scientists (51 authors) prepared under the guidance of Academician of the RAS V., V. Ivanter's monograph "Arctic Regions of Russia: Management and Development Systems". My specialists also contributed to this work. Personally, in my life I had to provide the Northern Sea Route and the Far East of the country with the RSDN for the navigation of ships and flights of our aviation. I liked this region, especially the Kuriles and Kamchatka. And Novaya Zemlya is unforgettable, often dreams. I have the honor.
    1. +2
      21 January 2017 15: 48
      Quote: midshipman
      Personally, in my life I had to provide the NSR and the Far East of the RSDN country for driving ships and flights of our aviation

      Dear midshipman, resolve the stupid question - is everything listed in the article really necessary? No, there are no questions about the Kuril Islands, everything is clear here, but ... coastal defense of the Arctic zone? Who is going to land there? I really do not understand and will be extremely grateful for the clarification.
      1. 0
        21 January 2017 20: 07
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        but ... coastal defense of the arctic zone?

        ... taking into account the fact that the "polar cap" is melting, there is a possibility of large-scale postings along the NSR. And roads, paths, passages must be protected. You never know what the UN decision will be with the "Northern Russian Arctic Shelf". "The one who has more Rights is right ..." (c) A.A. Gromyko. Maybe it turns out that - "The Army and the Navy are our only Allies" and in this matter ...
        Against the Force, do not trample!
        1. +2
          21 January 2017 20: 46
          These considerations do not seem correct to me. I just can't imagine who will need to climb into the NSR! I understand the need to keep the necessary and sufficient forces along the line "Kola Peninsula - Bear Island - Spitsbergen", because the Barents Sea is a Russian lake, and anyone who thinks differently can kill himself against the wall right away, in order to avoid, so to speak, cognitive dissonance. But, as I think, the issue of the defense of this lake is being decided by the aviation forces and the Northern Fleet, which should actually solve this issue. What does coastal defense have to do with it? This is not clear to me, and I ask for clarification.
  7. 0
    22 January 2017 07: 29
    Quote: Rus2012
    Quote: Old26
    It looks like Litovkin has "creative stagnation". of course you can place everything. In Anadyr, even the "regiment" was deploying strategic missiles.

    ... was the deal! Moreover, the P-14 missiles are ground, not even mine. Hop airfield with RTB. Plus for cover - a motorized rifle division with a tank regiment, air defense missiles!

    As for - stationary systems - anti-ship missiles and air defense ...
    Still, they should be of the PGRK type, but with several points of permanent deployment in the form of insulated Krones. Those. capable of "shooting" both from the main / reserve PPD, and from any other place where it may be necessary to relocate. This is to ensure "survivability" and the closure of "dangerous directions" ....

    He himself served there. The R-14 rocket was not. They were decommissioned in general in 1983. It was; RSD-10 (15Zh45). "Pioneer", according to NATO classification SS-20 Saber. The firing range was up to 5000 km. If you call a full-fledged air force base 171 IAP, with all the structures, the airport on which both the TU-154, the AN-24, and the TU-95 were based, in Ugolnye Kopi, as a jump airfield, then then in your airbase? Both the air base and the air defense missile regiment (which covered not only Gudym, but also the city of Anadyr, the air force base, and could shoot at the strait) and the RTV brigade were united into one division. In 1983, after the downed Boeing, there was A motorized rifle division has been deployed. The tundra consists of rocky soil there. There is no swamp. So in the summer there is no problem moving tracked vehicles. The main danger is in the windows of the lakes.
    1. 0
      22 January 2017 13: 33
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      There were no R-14 missiles. They were decommissioned in general in the 1983 year. There were; RSD-10 (15Ж45). "Pioneer", according to NATO classification SS-20 Saber.

      The answer is -
      "Pioneers" never stood there. Bullshit about "starting from different positions and on the go."

      Perhaps such plans were. But ... what was not, then did not take place.
      And most importantly, there is not a single "pioneer leader" rocket scientist who could confirm this ....
      The fact that there were plans, I can confirm with an example - there were the same plans for the "Pioneers" on Vrangel Island. He himself was "assigned" there ...
      и
      In June-August of the 1962 of the year, the 83y missile regiment with P14 missiles was relocated from the Primorsky Territory to the region of the city of Anadyr (from Ussuriysk to the port of Sovetskaya Gavan, then to the port of Anadyr). During four flights, the regiment was completely relocated, and installation work began in the difficult conditions of the Far North of Chukotka.
      ...
      On 23 on January 1964, the regiment took up combat duty at a new location (Anadyr1 (Gudym), town2).
      In the period 1962-1969 years. The 83th Missile Regiment was based in Anadyr as part of a single division with four P14 (8K65) ground launchers.
  8. +1
    22 January 2017 14: 17
    Quote: Rus2012
    Quote: Mar. Tira
    There were no R-14 missiles. They were decommissioned in general in the 1983 year. There were; RSD-10 (15Ж45). "Pioneer", according to NATO classification SS-20 Saber.

    The answer is -
    "Pioneers" never stood there. Bullshit about "starting from different positions and on the go."

    Perhaps such plans were. But ... what was not, then did not take place.
    And most importantly, there is not a single "pioneer leader" rocket scientist who could confirm this ....
    The fact that there were plans, I can confirm with an example - there were the same plans for the "Pioneers" on Vrangel Island. He himself was "assigned" there ...
    и
    In June-August of the 1962 of the year, the 83y missile regiment with P14 missiles was relocated from the Primorsky Territory to the region of the city of Anadyr (from Ussuriysk to the port of Sovetskaya Gavan, then to the port of Anadyr). During four flights, the regiment was completely relocated, and installation work began in the difficult conditions of the Far North of Chukotka.
    ...
    On 23 on January 1964, the regiment took up combat duty at a new location (Anadyr1 (Gudym), town2).
    In the period 1962-1969 years. The 83th Missile Regiment was based in Anadyr as part of a single division with four P14 (8K65) ground launchers.

    Nothing about what years you’re talking about. I’m talking about the eighties, and to the end. When our Mechnyi gave the order to liquidate the PGRK, and the 25th Air Defense Division in Anadyr. All this took place with me.
  9. +1
    23 January 2017 13: 00
    I would like to correct the author:
    "Short-range air defense systems should also be placed on articulated snowmobiles or their analogues - the Tor-M2 and Pantsir-S1 complexes are available in modular versions, they can be placed on any transport base, including articulated snowmobiles.

    Another thing is the S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems. They require stationary sites, as, incidentally, for the complexes "Ball" and "Bastion". Their task is to block the Bering Strait with fire capabilities so that foreign warships with missile defense systems and long-range cruise missiles on board do not pass through it towards the West. It seems that such a task can be done by these complexes "

    Here lies are written. None of the above complexes require stationary positions, as they can all work from anywhere. In addition, the S-400 is also modular and can also be redone for any chassis. But MTD is needed for all complexes.