Guns and ammunition: tanks seek to increase their firepower


MBT by the German Army Leopard 2А6 produced by Krauss-Maffei Wegmann is armed with a 120-mm L55 smoothbore gun, for which Rheinmetall supplies a full set of ammunition


Recent developments in the field of firepower of armored combat vehicles have mainly focused on the ammunition rather than the guns themselves. However, new survivability technologies are pushing a number of countries to develop new ones. tank guns that will have increased firepower. Consider some of the existing programs.

The main task of the main battle tank (MBT) is to fire on the armored combat vehicles (BBM) of the enemy, but the minor task remains to provide fire support to the dismounted and motorized infantry, which, in fact, has prevailed in recent times.

Recent and ongoing hostilities have highlighted this secondary task, which has led to the development and deployment of more specialized ammunition. Meanwhile, the emergence of improved tank protection systems has led a number of countries, including Germany and Russia, to develop larger-caliber tank guns, which are made of stronger steel and that can shoot new-generation kinetic ammunition with a greater initial speed.

Traditionally, the main ammunition for OBT was an armored-piercing feathered sabot projectile (BOPS), which may also have a tracer element. It is used to neutralize other MBTs and has a long hardened core for maximum impact on the target. It can be made of traditional material or depleted uranium, the latter preferred by tank operators from the UK and the United States.

However, the US is moving away from depleted uranium shells, since they cannot be used in combat training, but they can be a possible source of radioactive contamination of the battlefield.

Other popular projectiles are high-explosive fragmentation (PF), anti-tank cumulative and armor-piercing high-explosive projectile with a crushed head HESH (high-explosive squash-head, in the United States received the designation high-explosive plastic [HEP]).

The Russian military has always used UF as an additional type, and now they have given this role to an air assault projectile, which makes it possible to fight well with entrenched and dismounted infantry.

In addition to the development of new cores and new throwing substances in order to increase the initial speed, there has also been a tendency to develop projectiles that are compatible with the standard for low-sensitive ammunition, and also capable of being used in a wider temperature range.

In addition to traditional ammunition, guided laser-guided projectiles continue to develop, making it possible to hit targets far beyond the firing range of conventional tank guns.

At long ranges, however, target recognition becomes problematic and time to neutralize them takes more than tank guns and projectiles with initial speeds of more than 1400 m / s.

Chinese evolution

The development of Chinese industry proceeded sequentially from the creation of local versions of mainly Russian armored vehicles to the development of their own weapons systems and types of ammunition.

A local version of the Russian 100-mm rifled D-10 cannon installed on the OBT Type 59 manufactured by North Industries Corporation (NORINCO), based on the T-54. In addition, the Chinese industry produces 105-mm rifled gun and corresponding ammunition based on Western designs. This gun was installed on the 59 MBT Tour, replacing the previous gun, and also being installed on other Chinese tanks, including the 69 Tour and the 80 Tour.

Later, the 125-mm smooth-bore cannon was developed for shells, for which they are fed by an automatic loader mounted under the turret, similar to automatic loaders mounted on Russian MBTs. This gun is installed on the Chinese MVT-3000 (also has the designation VT4), Tour 98 / 99, MBT-2000, VT2 and Tour 85.

The 120-mm Chinese-made smooth-bore cannon is mounted on a PTZ89 self-propelled antitank machine (the 89 Tour), which has never been offered for export.

NORINCO also developed a retrofit kit for the Toure 59, which included the 120-mm smoothbore gun, which is no longer offered by the company; in addition, there is no data whether it was sold abroad.

The gun fires BOPS with an initial speed of 1600 m / s, which, according to the manufacturer, can penetrate 550 mm rolled armor at a distance of 1500 meters. The next version of BOPS has a higher initial speed 1725 m / s and improved armor penetration characteristics.

The 105-mm rifled gun with small recoil forces for light tracked and wheeled armored vehicles was also developed, it has a new recoil system and a muzzle brake.

Guns and ammunition: tanks seek to increase their firepower

Chinese MBT MBT3000 (VT4), armed with an 125-mm smoothbore gun with automatic loader, is offered in the export market

The gun is mounted on the ZTD-05 artillery, based on the ZBD-05 amphibious assault vehicle, as well as on the ST1 8x8 wheeled anti-tank, which NORINCO offers for export.

NORINCO also offers a GP125 laser-guided projectile and its 7-mm version GP105; both have a maximum range of 2 meters and are equipped with a tandem-shaped cumulative warhead to neutralize targets with dynamic protection.

Germany led

In Western Europe, Germany is the leader in the field of MBT ammunition and the German company Rheinmetall plans to expand its offer on existing cannons and ammunition, as well as present new types.

The German Army’s Leopard 2A5 MBT is armed with an 120-mm Rheinmetall L44 smooth-bore cannon, for which there are two main types of ammunition: BOPS with a conventional core and universal cumulative NEAT-MR.

Rheinmetall pays great attention to improving BOPS and its newest model, BOPS DM63 / DM63A1 has enhanced armor penetration and, like all its ammunition of this type, has a traditional tungsten core not of depleted uranium.

In addition to the Leopard 2 tank, the LHNUMX cannon from Rheinmetall is also installed on the American M44А1 / М1А1 Abrams tanks manufactured by General Dynamics Land Systems, although this version differs in a number of improvements, for example, it has a different design. The American version, designated M2, is manufactured at Watervliet Arsenal.

Meanwhile, the LHNUMX tank gun also developed by Rheinmetall began to be installed on the tanks of the German army Leopard 55A2 and 6А2 (and soon on 7А2); It was designed to replace the L8 gun and has a long range when firing BOPS. The gun and its ammunition have a good potential, but ultimately they have exhausted the possibilities for further improvement.


As an initiative, Rheinmetall developed a new 130-mm smoothbore gun, which was first shown in June 2016, along with models of its new 130-mm BOPS


The tank of the American Army М1А1 / М1А2 Abrams is equipped with a 120-mm smoothbore gun M2SXNNUMX, which is a further development of the German 6-mm gun L120

According to the company, it is developing the 130-mm smoothbore gun and the corresponding BOPS, which were shown at the Eurosatory exhibition in June 2016. The company is currently conducting firing tests of the system.

The development of the gun began in 2015 year, while the company led this project at its own expense. The first demo of the gun was made in May 2016.

The new 130-mm smoothbore gun was designated L51 (respectively, the length of the barrel 51 caliber), it has a vertically sliding bolt mechanism, a larger volume of chambers and a chrome finish, but does not have a muzzle brake.

Not much is known about this gun, but the company claims a total mass of 3000 kg, which includes the mass of the recoil system, and the mass of one barrel is 1400 kg.

The specimen presented at the Eurosatory exhibition was equipped with a thermal housing and a system for combining the gun axis with the optical axis of the sight, which are also mounted on the gun undergoing shooting tests. The system of combining the axis of the gun with the optical axis of the sight allows for reconciliation of weapons regularly without the need for the crew to exit the car.

The new generation BOPS will have a semi-combustible sleeve, it will be equipped with a new propellant and a new improved long tungsten core. It should be followed by a new high-explosive fragmentation projectile of an air blasting NOT the AVM, which will have a programmable fuse.

The non-AVM projectile borrowed technology from the OM120 11-mm projectile, which is currently manufactured for the L44 and L55 guns.

BOPS and non-AVM projectile will be insensitive, since such a requirement puts forward an increasing number of customers; all that will remain after the shooting is a half-burned sleeve.

Rheinmetall is positioning a new cannon and ammunition as a possible weapon for promising MBTs or artillery mounts and, in principle, it could be part of the modernization of existing MBTs.

Along with installation, the armament complex can be integrated into traditional three-seat towers into two-seat towers (with a gunner-operator and commander) equipped with an automatic loader, which allows them to be made more compact.

Another possible application is the installation in remote-controlled towers with a gun mounted externally and with the supply of projectiles from an automatic loader, which allows the crew to be placed under the protection of the hull.

For lighter platforms, Rheinmetall also developed a prototype 120-mm tank gun Rh120 L47 with a new anti-recoil system (respectively, with low recoil forces), a thermal housing, an ejector of gunpowder gases and an alignment system (cold adjustment). The prototype can shoot all standard 120-mm tank ammunition manufactured by Rheinmetall.

Previously, Rheinmetall developed prototypes of 105-mm smoothbore guns, giving them the designation Rh-105-20 from Rh-105-30. They are designed for installation on lighter platforms, in addition, a family of corresponding high-performance 105-mm ammunition was developed. The designs of both guns are distinguished by a vertical bolt mechanism, and the Rh-105-20 version is a muzzle brake; until the production of these guns began.

In addition to Germany, several more countries are engaged in the development of weapons systems for MBT in Western Europe. The French MBT manufactured by Nexter Systems Leclerc, is in service with the French army and the United Arab Emirates, is armed with a 120-mm smoothbore F1 gun also manufactured by Nexter Systems. Initially, the gun ammunition included the BOPS and the cumulative fragmentation NEAT-MR projectile; later, the APFSDS F1В version of the BOPS, having an initial speed of 1790 m / s, was developed for it.

Recently, the French army received a Nexter Munitions RP-projectile with an initial speed of 1050 m / s and a declared range of 4000 m. It should be followed by an insensitive 120-mm M3M RP-projectile with a three-mode fuse, which is programmed as a shock, delayed and airborne undermining.

Nexter Systems also worked on the 120-mm recoilless LRF cannon, which was tested on the 8x8 test platform, but its production has not yet begun.

Italian options

For many years, Oto Melara (currently part of the Leonardo holding) has been producing 105-mm rifled and 120-mm smooth-bore tank guns. She also developed recoilless 105-mm rifled guns, which were installed on the Centauro 8x8 Mobile Gun System (MGS) ACS, currently in service with Italy, Spain and Jordan.

Later a smooth-bore 120-mm / 45 klb high-pressure barrel gun was developed, which was installed on the Centauro II MGS ACS. The gun, capable of firing all standard 120-mm ammunition, is equipped with a muzzle brake, a thermal housing, an ejector of powder gases and an instrument alignment system. 120-mm version of the L52 LRF with a barrel length 52 caliber could be an alternative that would increase the range when firing armor-piercing shells.

The Belgian company CMI Defense has found a niche in the field of armament of combat vehicles and, along with the line of towers, produces two 90-mm rifled guns - the 8 and 3 and the 105-mm rifle gun.

The 8 Mk gun is installed in the LCTS 90MP (Medium Pressure) twin-seat tower, and the 3 Mk gun in the CSE 90LP (Low Pressure) twin-seat tower.

The 105-mm CV gun was initially installed in the CT-CV twin-turret with an automatic loader in the rear of the turret, which reduced the crew in the turret to commander and gunner. The development of the CTCV tower has been completed, but it is known that no contracts for its mass production have been concluded yet.

One possible application for the 105-mm CV guns is the modular turret 3000 Modular Turret System from CMI Defense Cockerill, which is produced for an unnamed overseas customer (clearly Saudi Arabia), and is likely to be installed on some of the newest lightweight armored LAV 8x8 machines manufactured by General Dynamics Land Systems - Canada.

In addition to firing standard ammunition, the CV gun successfully shot off the Falarick anti-tank guided missile. This projectile was developed by the company together with the Ukrainian industry and allows you to fire at targets at a distance of 5000 meters.

The projectile is equipped with a tandem cumulative warhead that copes well with targets with dynamic protection. In order to ensure the defeat of the target, the gunner must keep it in the crosshair until the rocket reaches the target.

CMI Defense also received technical documentation and rights to sell the Compact Tank Gun (CTG) developed by RUAG Defense’s 120-mm gun, which was originally intended to upgrade the Swiss Pz 68 MBT, which, however, were eventually decommissioned.

For testing, the CTG smoothbore gun was installed in the Falcon 2 turret developed by the King Abdullah II Design and Development Bureau (KADDB) of Jordan and at the Al Hussein MBT (former British Army Challenger 1 tank), but these works did not go beyond initial firing tests.

This gun is demonstrated as one of the claimants for the armament of the CMI Defense XC-8 twin-turreted tower, the other challenger is the 105-mm rifled CV gun. The model of the XC-8 turret was shown on the South Korean K21 infantry fighting vehicle, which is standardly equipped with a twin turret armed with an 40-mm cannon and a twin machine gun.

Israeli weapons

Israeli industry is working to increase firepower by improving ammunition for the Israeli army’s MBT.

Tanks Merkava Mk 1 and Mk 2 local development, now decommissioned, were armed with 105-mm rifled gun manufacturing IMI Israeli company, while the newer versions of Merkava Mk 3 and Mk 4 armed 120-mm smoothbore gun MG251 and MG253 respectively also produced by IMI, the latter stands on the Turkish platforms M60T Sabra.

In addition to the development of new-generation BOPS, IMI pays close attention to the development and production of 120-mm tank shells optimized for urban combat, including anti-personnel shells.

IMI has also developed 105-mm and 120-mm smooth-bore guns with a small recoil, but it is not known whether their production began and whether they will be offered to foreign customers.


General Dynamics European Land Systems - Desert Piranha - MOWAG with a CMI Defense Cockerill 3105 turret, armed with an 105-mm 105 CT rifled gun

Russian expansion

Russia basically arms its tanks with guns of larger caliber than the guns of tanks of NATO countries. The T-72, T-80, T-90 tanks and the latest Armata T-14 MBT are armed with 125-mm smooth-bore guns developed by Plant No. XXUMX. They can fire guided projectiles, as well as all traditional ammunition.

In the sphere of guided missiles, first emphasis was placed on the complex with radio command guidance, named Cobra (index of the 9K112 complex), but later the Russian military "put" on laser-guided munitions that were made in three calibers: 100 mm, 115 mm and 125 mm . For the BMP-3 and towed anti-tank installation T-12 was intended 100-mm, and for self-propelled anti-tank gun 2X25 Sprut-SD 125-mm projectile.
The latest laser-guided 125-mm projectiles have a maximum range of 5000 meters and are equipped with a tandem cumulative warhead.

For the T-4 T-95 perspective XBNT project (which was closed in favor of the Armata project in 2010), which has already died in the Bose, Plant No.9 (part of Uralvagonzavod) developed and tested an 152-mm gun, which received the designation 283 . It was rumored that it could be installed in future versions of the Armata T-14 MBT, although the prototypes and the first 100 production machines will have an 125-mm smooth-bore 2-82-1-gun. A new laser-guided projectile for the 2А82-1М gun was designated the "Sprinter" (index of the guided missile ZUBK21).

For its tank BM "Oplot", the Ukrainian industry manufactures 125-mm smooth-bore cannon KBA-3, which, like the Russian weapon This caliber also shoots separate-loading ammunition.

In addition, since Russian-made laser-guided projectiles are no longer available, the Ukrainian state-owned Luch Design Bureau has developed its own family of such ammunition. The 125-mm version, called “Combat”, has a declared maximum range of 5000 meters and is equipped with a tandem cumulative warhead.


Turkish Altay MBT armed with 120-mm smoothbore gun

American affairs

The main BOPS of American tanks M1А1 / М1А2, which are in service with the army and the Marine Corps, is the М829 armor-piercing projectile with tracer, which is equipped with a core of depleted uranium to improve armor penetration. The projectile was constantly being improved, the length of the cores grew, the characteristics of armor penetration increased; its last variant is designated as M829А4.

Little is known about the details of the improvement of the M829А4 projectile, but some sources report that it has a longer core compared to previous versions. The M829X4 uses an improved sleeve as well as a propelling charge independent of temperature.

Ammunition for 120-mm smoothbore gun М256 is manufactured by General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems and Orbital ATK Armament Systems, and for foreign buyers they offer BOPS with non-depleted uranium core.

The 120-mm universal cumulative fragmentation projectile goes under the designation М830А1, among other special projectiles it is necessary to call the 120-mm cluster anti-personnel projectile М1028.
Although the Abrams army and marine corps tanks are equipped with the same M256 smoothbore gun manufactured by Watervliet Arsenal, which is based on the German L44 gun developed by Rheinmetall, but they use different projectiles.

The infantrymen purchased a DM120 11-mm OB-projectile from Rheinmetall, while the army began a program to develop such a projectile, designated as HM1147 AMP (Advanced Multi-Purpose - advanced universal), which is carried out by two groups of developers at once.

It was expected that MBT M1А1 / М1А2 would be replaced by one of the components of the Future Combat System (Mounted Combat System) Future Combat System (Future Combat System) program that was closed in 2009. This system would have been armed with a new 120-mm XM360 smoothbore gun manufactured by Watervliet Arsenal.

The number of contractors in NATO countries that currently have the ability to design, develop and produce tank guns and related ammunition kits has decreased over the past few years.

The development of tank guns in Europe has actually stopped, and time will tell whether the development and production of the Russian T-14 tank will force Armata of global manufacturers to new developments besides the recently presented Rheinmetall 130-mm smooth-bore gun.

Materials used:
www.rheinmetall.com
www.kmweg.com
www.norinco.com
www.nexter-group.fr
www.leonardocompany.com
www.cmigroupe.com
www.imi-israel.com
www.uvz.ru
www.zavod9.com
www.luch.kiev.ua
www.gd-ots.com
www.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Nix1986 20 January 2017 07: 18 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I think that in the near future the emphasis will be on the creation of propellant charges that are not sensitive to thermal and kinetic influences in order to remove the possibility of detonation or fire of an ammunition load when it enters a tank. And already in the distant future it’s a railgun that has gotten its teeth on edge, how far this prospect is difficult to say, the main problem, like for many other things, is a compact power source, in our case for a tank. In any case, the first railgun will receive the ship, as there the problem of energy supply is not so acute, on the same zumvolt for example. Something like this.
    1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 10: 04 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Nix1986
      I think that in the near future the emphasis will be on the creation of propellant charges that are not sensitive to thermal and kinetic influences in order to remove the possibility of detonation or fire of an ammunition load when it enters a tank.

      It is not at all a fact that the evaporation of an inert substance will require less energy than the dispersal of a projectile by a railgun.
      1. Nix1986 20 January 2017 10: 07 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        I think much less, in any case, energy will be needed only to create the reaction itself, and only the projectile will push the energy of the propellant itself. See how this is implemented in the new Coalition self-propelled guns, there, like the propellant launch initiation system, and nothing extraordinary with the propulsion system of the self-propelled guns was necessary.
        1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 10: 31 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Nix1986
          See how this is implemented in the new Coalition self-propelled guns, there, like the propellant launch initiation system, and nothing extraordinary with the propulsion system of the self-propelled guns was necessary.

          In general, according to electrothermochemicals, there is a division into generations. Each one requiring more energy.
          A. Electroinitiation of a propelling charge (MOH)
          B. Guided initiation of MOH
          C. Controlled combustion of the MOH
          D. Controlled combustion of a hydrogen-containing substance
          E. Controlled evaporation of an inert substance.



          On 2С35 generation A + is implemented. This is not yet a controlled initiation, but at the same time, the simultaneous uniform ignition of propellant charges gives a more optimal result than that which could be given by uncontrolled electrical initiation.

          Well and accordingly, A + requires low energy for its work.
          1. Nix1986 20 January 2017 10: 41 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            But in any case, this is not the cost of dispersing 10 kg of blanks to hypersound. And with torn towers or burnt booty, it's time to do something. This is a very urgent task.
            1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 10: 46 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Nix1986
              And with torn towers or burnt booty, it's time to do something. This is a very urgent task.

              Isolation of charges in special containers, highly efficient fire-fighting systems, filling the fighting compartment with inert gas
              1. Nix1986 20 January 2017 11: 14 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                All this will not be necessary if a propelling charge insensitive to thermal and kinetic loads is used. There were articles about successful developments in this area, here we are waiting ...
                1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 12: 26 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Quote: Nix1986
                  All this will not be necessary if a propelling charge insensitive to thermal and kinetic loads is used.

                  With high probability, this will require very, very large energy costs per shot. Both in the variant of evaporation of an inert propellant and less energy-consuming electrodegradation of hydrogen-containing substances with subsequent combustion of hydrogen (for example, Rheinmetal specialists work apparently with the formula


                  The second option is binary HMW. In an uninhabited fighting compartment, the issue of safety of high pressure pipelines will not be so acute, therefore, they can be applied. But here the question is price. A high-precision high-pressure pump - a “dispenser”, a very powerful contraption.
                  1. Nix1986 20 January 2017 13: 26 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    In order not to come up with, but all this will be before the invention of a compact power source and, as a consequence, the possibility of installing a railgun on a tank. Although reading the fate of thermonuclear fusion and cold fusion, I think we will get this most compact power source as soon as not, so most likely the railgun will be registered only on ships for a very long time.
                    1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 14: 36 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Superconductivity is getting warmer every year, so ...

                      By the way, why exactly the rail, and not the ring? The speed is slightly lower, but the energy needed is, in theory, much less. And modern electronics is quite capable of synchronizing them.
                      1. Nix1986 20 January 2017 15: 44 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        So far in the intricacies of time I did not go into, but all that is in the metal is the rails. There, people knowingly eat bread, I think there is a reason. And so far I also have not seen superconductivity to reach the consumer in some kind of mass stray, also only laboratory samples and attractive prospects.
    2. Cro-Magnon 21 January 2017 21: 45 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Back in the early 80s, I read in the ZVO about the work of Americans on 2- and 3-component liquid propellants (LMW) ... the work was curtailed immediately after the “victory” in ХВ!
  2. dzvero 20 January 2017 09: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In my opinion, the MBT of the classic layout has reached its ceiling. To put a 152 mm cannon and accordingly increase the reservation is not impossible, but the mass and dimensions will sharply limit mobility (the requirement is that the tank "hold" its projectile).
    A possible evolution is shown by the example of the T-14 - an uninhabited tower; accordingly, the armor can be increased within the total mass up to 70 tons. In this regard, the MBT is likely to “disappear” and the division into heavy tanks like Armata and “light” armored platforms of the same configuration will return, weighing up to 40 tons, guns of 100 mm and with armor “holding” the same 100 mm.
    1. Comrade Stalin 20 January 2017 11: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, and Armata is also not the limit of perfect layout. It is necessary to place the fighting compartment in the stern, including the driver, so that the front crew also protects the MTO. With the development of video surveillance systems, there is no need to place a crew in front as in Armata.
      1. dzvero 20 January 2017 12: 12 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        If the armored capsule protects the crew by 99%, then it can be placed anywhere in the hull.
      2. Lopatov 20 January 2017 12: 40 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Comrade_Stalin
        It is necessary to place the fighting compartment in the stern, including the driver, so that the front crew also protects the MTO.

        It is uninhabited ...
        In your version, the layout will be as follows: MTO, followed by an uninhabited fighting compartment, followed by a control compartment. At the stern of the car. That is, the crew will not be able to monitor the terrain without cameras by default. If she refuses, they won’t even be able to leave the battlefield.

        Yes, and an attempt to protect something with the engine .... a very, very controversial decision. I am afraid that the aluminum engine is not a very good protection against BOPS; the crowbar will simply not notice it. And you can protect yourself from cumulative ones in less extreme ways.

        Plus, this will require additional work to reduce the visibility of the MTO in the IR range.
        1. Cro-Magnon 21 January 2017 21: 52 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          You’re wrong! It’s just easier to leave the battlefield if the op-amp is in the stern ... in reverse, the mechanic is looking through the optics in the direction of the course and there is no need to substitute less protected stern for the enemy! And then, during the Second World War, our mechvody ran away from the battlefield, turning back to the enemy and received shells in the engine ... the Germans crawled away like cancers ...
  3. Operator 20 January 2017 10: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    152-mm 2А83 - a thing, everything else - sucks.
  4. tchoni 20 January 2017 13: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I wonder why the topic of large-caliber mortars with the ability to launch ATGM calmed down? Like the same "Shileila"? Indeed, for solving "secondary fire problems", which are now becoming paramount, this type of weapon will be very effective (thanks to a powerful HE projectile). And for a tank of anti-tank caliber, say, 152 mm will be no less dangerous than BOPS ....
    1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 15: 01 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: tchoni
      this type of gun will be very effective (thanks to a powerful HE shell

      ??
      Firstly, this tank never received a HE shell, only cumulative and buckshot. And even if he received, he would be very, very weak

      The weight of the entire shot is almost two times less than the weight of a Soviet-made 152-mm shell alone. With a firing range of 3000 meters.

      So the staff, taking into account the fact that the Sheridan practically did not have to deal with Soviet tanks, it was essentially used as a large-caliber shotgun 8)))
      1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 15: 02 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Flying buckshot:
        1. tchoni 20 January 2017 17: 12 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          ""[/ b] [b] Opinion slightly changed after the first battle that occurred in the predawn hours of January 29, 1969. Two Sheridans were at a checkpoint near the Long Binh highway when they noticed traffic. Turning on two powerful spotlights, the crews attacked the advancing infantry with M625 Ulei shells. Shrapnel literally annihilated the enemy. The next morning, they discovered 125 corpses and clear evidence that many more wounded, able to move independently, crawled away from the battle. quote from an article dated February 17, 14 of this portal. “Sheridan. And its combat use.” Good shotgun, I would say. Effective.
          1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 17: 58 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: tchoni
            Good shotgun, I would say. Effective.

            Is not a fact. The six-barreled Ontos as a shotgun was an order of magnitude more efficient. And there are more striking elements, and there is the possibility of remote detonation, and the striking elements are swept, not balls.
            But you do not offer to return to the 106-mm recoilless ...
      2. tchoni 20 January 2017 16: 24 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Dear, do not cling to the name. the Sheridan tank was probably not a good implementation of a sound idea. It is possible to draw conclusions about the weakness of a high explosive charge by comparing the mass of explosives. And not the weight of the projectile as such. By abandoning the thick wall due to light loads, you can reduce the weight of the shot without harming the high-explosive action.
        About the shotgun - a great joke. ))) But, given the fact that the Yankees from it were mostly thinking of shooting green, then maybe they needed a shotgun?
        But it’s not at all a land mine ... Rice-eaters, I remember, were not building maginot lines in the jungle.
        But our 152 mm self-propelled guns in street battles showed their worthlessly. To learn to shoot a 152 mm howitzer guided missile - I think it's not difficult. ....
        So ... Maybe in 60-70 the time of such tanks as the "Sheridan" has not come yet?
        1. Lopatov 20 January 2017 18: 03 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: tchoni
          Dear, do not cling to the name. the Sheridan tank was probably not a good implementation of a sound idea.

          This was not the realization of the idea that you are talking about. There was no "power" there when firing conventional shells. They were weaker than even the 125-mm Soviet tank HE shells

          Quote: tchoni
          But our 152 mm self-propelled guns in street battles showed their worthlessly.

          This is when, due to poor training of artillerymen or their commanders-general arms, self-propelled guns were pulled for direct fire?
          1. tchoni 20 January 2017 19: 00 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            This is when they demolished the entrance of the house with two three shells.
  5. Barakuda 20 January 2017 20: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    120-125-130 mm recourse 5 mm - a lot or a little? And the length of the projectile itself with the same length in calibers? Who is in the know, enlighten.
  6. Earnest 21 January 2017 20: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    there has also been a tendency to develop shells compatible with the standard for low-sensitivity munitions

    Can anyone clarify this phrase?
    1. ura-banzai 8 February 2017 22: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      TNT operates in shells up to a speed of 1000-1200 m per second further, with an increase in the starting speed of 1900 m per second (BOPS exit from the barrel channel) detonation of explosive explosives may occur; for this, the velocity of a high-explosive fragmentation projectile is reduced to a safe somewhere around 800- 900m per second and when shooting, correction of the priscle is introduced, and this is the time of both aiming and flight of the projectile. There is an opinion that 6kg SI4 will stick on the tank on the armor and any tank will burst, but this must be delivered quickly with the speed of the BOPS so as not to rebuild the sight even though it is electronic.
  7. ura-banzai 8 February 2017 21: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    One way or another, any tank has good armor plus active defense and mobility. So you need to blind the tank --- hit the instruments and overcome active defense. As an option, a flying small gun with a diameter of 125 and a length as long as anyone wants within reason. When approaching a tank before the action of a trophy type AZ, a buckshot is fired, very strong balls fly out of the flying gun (correctly said) with a speed of 1000, it was plus a little bit - well, maybe 1000, as a result, the tank has a very good cement coating including firing instruments , observations, dynamic protection on the radar of AZ and fired ammunition, and even in the barrel can fly. Then we hit the leopard’s choice to the right of the cannon under the abrams under the breath or under the trunk of the others as the book writes. After blinding, the first reaction of the driver’s foot drive, then blows to the head of the driver’s driver with a boot of the type, turn on the back and roll back. And then the desired Chinese acquisition is just a rescue Chinese video rear view camera. Almost humanitarian aid for a tank-- the crew of an entire tank is not capable of working.
  8. Nikolaevich I April 1 2017 12: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The creation of insensitive propellant charges can be carried out in different ways: 1. Solid propellant (MB) is insensitive in the "initial" phase, passes into another ("necessary") phase by preliminary initiation with the help of an additional "miniature" charge; 2. A solid MV goes into the “right” phase after exposure to an electric impulse (especially high power is not required). Some articles about the T-95 mention the 135-mm gun - so there is an answer to the 130-mm German gun. Adoption of the 152- mm guns will create ammunition with amazing efficiency!