Pistols of the Hungarian gunsmith Rudolf von Frommer (part 4)

24
As you already know, Frommer Stop pistol turned out to be a good official weapons. But among its drawbacks can be noted the excessive complexity of automation and its high cost. Army needed a simple and cheap gun. Therefore, at the end of the 20 of the last century, Rudolf Frommer worked on a cheaper to manufacture and easy-to-use pistol. Since the National Army was in dire need of such a weapon, the designer decided not to develop it from scratch, but to use its own groundwork. As a result, he crossed the simple automatics of the Frommer Liliput waistcoat with the handle of the Frommer Stop service pistol.

The choice of ammunition.



During the fighting 1-th World Bullet 7,65-mm pistol cartridges showed their low efficiency, and the whole world began to switch to 9-mm cartridges. And since Frommer's 9-mm cartridge did not survive, Rudolf Frommer decided to develop a Browning cartridge (.9 ACP) for 17х380. Over the 20 years since its inception, the .380 ACP cartridge has proven its effectiveness and gained popularity both in the states and in Europe.
Perhaps this cartridge was chosen by the designer in the hope of increasing the export potential of his new pistol.

Adoption.

Frommer's new pistol was ready in the 1929 year and it was immediately adopted by the Hungarian Armed Forces under the designation 29М (29 Minta — the 1929 model of the year). And after the reconstruction of the Hungarian Air Force in 1939, the Hungarian pilots were armed with a 29M pistol. Police, gendarmerie, and others continued to use Frommer Stop, and their rearmament was not planned. Unlike previous models, the new pistol did not receive a proper name, and the designer’s name is rarely mentioned in official documents. Since at the base (1891 year), the manufacturer bore the same name, and in 1935, it was renamed - the gun became known as FEG 29M (FEG - short for Fegyvergyar) and Femar 29M.

Pistols of the Hungarian gunsmith Rudolf von Frommer (part 4)

FEG 29M. Marking on 29М pistols during the 1929-1934 period.



Femaru 29M. Marking on 29M pistols made in 1935 of the year. Occurs on pistols with serials from 14 000 and above.


Gun device.

The lower part of the frame is almost entirely borrowed from Frommer Stop. On the back of the handle is the same automatic fuse, trigger and hook, at the base of the handle there is a sling for the strap and a magazine latch. On the top of the frame, a new model has appeared: a slide lag. The length of the barrel 29M in contrast to Frommer Liliput doubled: from 53 to 100 mm.

As on Frommer Liliput, the 29M has a removable barrel, and is fixed on the front of the gun frame by means of a rusk joint *. For this, transverse grooves (grooves) are carved in the frame, and transverse projections on the trunk. The protrusions on the trunk enter the grooves on the frame, thereby fixing the trunk. Since the 29M uses a more powerful cartridge, and the barrel has become twice as long - the protrusions on the barrel are not 2 (as on Liliput), but 4. The recoil spring was also one and was located under the barrel, worn on the guide rod.

The shutter of the 29M pistol is delayed.


The new pistol inherited a recognizable detail at the rear of the casing from Frommer Liliput: a corrugated casing cover (in the patent - the cap), which held the bolt and served for cocking the weapon **. On Frommer's 1929 pistol of the year, the trigger was traditionally triggered, single acting. So, given the design of its automation - we can safely say that this is a scaled version of Frommer Liliput.

* The stem dry connection is implemented on the Browning M1903 pistol, then the simplified connection scheme was moved to the M1910.
** The solution with a lid in a Frommer pistol resembles the nut of a receiver on a Sauer M1913 pistol.


Details of the Frommer 29M pistol after complete disassembly.


The sights of the 29M pistol are located in the same places, except that they have become more visible: the cover of the 29М casing has become more massive than on Liliput.


Cover of a casing of a unique form with inertial brisk and entirely.



Pay attention to the swivel: it is on the hinge and in the “from itself” position protects the magazine latch from accidental pressing.



The rear sight is located on the cover of the casing and provides a large sighting line.


The shop latch button is traditionally located: at the base of the handle, next to the front end for the belt. It can move on the latch button, thereby protecting it from accidental clicks. Power pistol was carried out from shops on 7 cartridges. As a rule, shops were equipped with a stop under the little finger in the form of a curved spur. You can distinguish Frommer 29M pistols and its modifications from other designers' pistols using this spur and casing cover. But there are also shops with a smooth emphasis, and without the 29M stigma on the heel of the store. They say that these are also original stores, but more simplified.


Frommer 29M pistol with “brand spur” on the heel of the store.





The stops under the little finger in the form of a curved spur, and straight.
Pay attention to the cheek handles: left convex, right - flat.


For 29 pistols, serials from 1 to 50 000 were allocated. But as you can see, in 5 years no more than 14 thousand units were produced. How many of them were produced for all the time - is unknown. At the moment, merchants and collectors met pistols with numbers from 42 to 31 202.

Initially, the M29 trigger guard was stamped with military acceptance with St. Stephen's crown. But then later pistols (the barrels with numbers from 12 116 to 13 557 are known) were branded with the letter “E” in a circle. Some believe that the M29 pistols for the police or the civilian market were so marked. Others believe that the letter “E” is an alternative stamp of military acceptance. As an argument, they cite the fact that the upgraded Mannikher rifles of the same Hungarian factory (35M and 43M) were also branded with the letter “E”, but they went into service with the German and then the Hungarian army. So, most likely, the letter “Е” on the gun М29 has no relation either to the civilian market or to the police.


Stamp with the crown of St. Stephen on the early 29M.



Stamp with the letter “E” on the late 29M.


For wearing Frommer 29M pistols, several types of holsters were developed. They were made of high quality leather and worn on the waist belt.







Training and sports gun Frommer.

In 1939, a sports version of the pistol for the small-caliber .29 LR cartridge was developed based on the 22M. Maybe the designer was inspired by the American small-sized Colt Ace (model 1911 of the year under a small piece). A small number of them were produced for testing. They differed from the base model with lower weight, lack of marking on the manufacturer on the case and the letter “C” before the serial number. For convenience, the grip was completed with shops with a “spur” under the little finger.


Educational and sports version of the gun 29M. Note the serial number with the prefix "C" and the lack of data on the manufacturer.


On tests, the target pistol showed good results, but this version did not go into the series. Perhaps, she did not receive approval because, like in the Frommer Liliput pistol, the barrel and the small magazine could easily be replaced with the barrel and the magazine for 9-mm cartridges from the basic version. And this is not a sporting weapon. Since the 29M pistols chambered for the .22 LR, a meager amount was produced, one of them was sold in the 2006 year for USD 4000. As for the prices of serial 29M pistols - at the GunAuction.COM auction one copy was sold for $ 420, the other for 650.

Frommer artifact.
I got a photo of this artifact (otherwise you will not name it) without any comments.


The only photo of the gun Frommer 29M with a butt.


A rifle butt is attached to the pistol. It seems to me that this is the butt of an experimental 1923 rifle, designed on the basis of the Manlicher system. For the best retention of weapons in front of the trigger guard installed a wooden handle.

Regarding the pistol itself - on the back of the casing of the shutter you can see the unique casing cover, which I wrote about above. It is seen that the trunk is located above the spring. This is undoubtedly a Frommer's 1929 model of the year. Apparently - it was an attempt to create on the basis of 29M pistol-carbine or “trench broom”. From previous stories, you know that during 1 World on the basis of Frommer Stop, a modification of the pistol was developed, capable of firing bursts and even a machine gun from two such twin pistols. That is, the designer already had the experience of creating automatic weapons and stores of increased capacity. Perhaps, on this experimental model, he worked out his ideas. Pay attention to the absence of handles cheeks: this leads to clogging of the aggregates and even the store can jam too. It can be seen that this unique sample did not go beyond the workshop and the factory shooting range.

Below for comparison I present a table with the performance characteristics of the samples, which were discussed in the article.


The gun Frommer FEG (Femaru) 29M was produced for 6 years (1929-1935). Based on the data I collected, more than 30 thousands of them were manufactured. In the Hungarian army, 29M was received favorably and there were no specific complaints about it. But he was still quite expensive in production and difficult to maintain. Therefore, before the start of the 2 World on its basis, another sample was developed, which was mass produced and replaced its progenitor. But about this - in the next part of the article.

The author thanks Sergey Linnik (Bongo) for his consultations.

To be continued ...

Information sources:
“Material part of small arms”. Author A.A. Blagonravov
http://modernfirearms.net/handguns/hg/hu/femaru-29m-r.html
http://zonwar.ru/pistolet/Frommer_29M.html
https://antikvariat.ru/auto/4024/86292/#.WGKiyLmdeOs
http://www.hungariae.com/From29.htm
http://www.gunauction.com/buy/13419730
http://www.gunauction.com/buy/9658996
http://www.gunauction.com/buy/10304493
http://zbroya.com.ua/article.php?id=1577
https://joesalter.ca/products/hungarian-feg-29m-640
http://www.collectorsfirearms.com/feg-1929-budapest-380-acp-pr25120/
http://candrsenal.com/pistol-hungarian-29m/
[/ size
Overview of the gun Frommer Femaru 29M

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    18 January 2017 15: 25
    Thank! As always, clearly, clearly and in detail. I like it.
    1. +4
      18 January 2017 15: 30
      Quote: Amurets
      Thank! As always, clearly, clearly and in detail. I like it.

      hi Thank you!
      I tried to describe the product in detail. It is a pity that it turned out so little material ...
      1. +3
        18 January 2017 15: 59
        Quote: Mister X
        I tried to describe the product in detail. It is a pity that it turned out so little material ...

        Even what you found is already a lot. Especially a gun with a butt. Specially looked through two reference books on small arms - this product is not.
        1. +6
          18 January 2017 16: 24
          Quote: Amurets
          Especially a gun with a butt. Specially looked through two reference books on small arms - this product is not.

          Apparently, this is the only product and the only photo. Found a couple of duplicates of this photo in the Chinese forums. For some reason they wrote that this is Frommer Stop. But I am sure that this is 29M and wrote in the article why.
  2. +3
    18 January 2017 17: 56
    Thanks to the author. Great article. Suitable as reference information to collectors.

    Regarding this staple, the magazine holding the pistol grip.

    With this bracket you need to be careful. Especially on the PM pistol. I think the advice is universal for all other pistols, with a similar magazine retention mechanism.

    When you insert the PM into the holster, it is necessary to ensure that the edge of the skin of the holster does not press this bracket and does not release the store. Otherwise, when you take out the gun from the holster, the store will just fall to your shame and embarrassment on the ground and have a lot of fun around.

    Practical advice.
    I came across a tight, dry holster from the PM. It was difficult to use. The gun came in very tightly and went out tightly.

    The solution to the question is as follows.

    The sock is taken. We pull on the gun. On top we stretch a plastic bag. Pour vodka into the holster (I poured rum, the smell of the holster has been smelling for a year now, a pleasant truth). Then we stuff the gun in the sock and in the bag. Leave for the night. In the morning, the holster will be soft and comfortable for the size of the gun.

    By the way, it will be necessary to buy a leather holster for PM. Now the fashion for tarpaulin and plastic have gone, I'm afraid leather will become a rarity.
    I love the classics.
    1. +5
      18 January 2017 18: 24
      Quote: gladcu2
      Practical advice. In the holster pour vodka ...

      It is possible and cologne. And your advice is suitable for stretching new shoes.
      As for the holster is specifically for Frommer 29M pistols and modifications. Holster pretty loose. In the next article I will post a photo of a 37M pistol in a holster, with 2 shops in my pockets. Apparently - spontaneous loss of the store should not be.
      1. +2
        18 January 2017 19: 56
        Mister X

        Maybe at this pistol, the bundles the pistol is a holster and will not fall out.

        But for beginners, like me, on occasion a couple of times the store dropped out of PM. Therefore, when I put the gun in the holster, I carefully monitor so as not to pry the latch.
        And in my pocket, the store was unfastened. So you can call such a system completely reliable with certain reservations.
  3. +2
    18 January 2017 20: 23
    We know and remember Browning, Colt and Tokarev - but looking at this, it is clear why we hear for the first time.
    1. +3
      18 January 2017 20: 40
      Quote: Bolhevik
      Browning, Colt and Tokarev know and remember

      And what about Shpagin, Degtyarev, Sudayev, Stechkin, Kalashnikov, Gryazev, Shipunov and others?
  4. +1
    18 January 2017 20: 46
    Quote: Michael Zadunaisky
    During the fighting of the 1st World bullet, 7,65 mm pistol cartridges showed their low efficiency, and the whole world began to switch to 9 mm cartridges.

    I demand that this article be banned as inhumane. Now the "witnesses of socialism" will begin to have hysteria, vomiting and diarrhea. How is this so, the author questioned the "most ingenious of genius" cartridge 7,62x25 mm TT and the weapon on it. After all, everyone ("witnesses", this is everything) knows that there was no more genius than a cartridge before the cartridge 9x18 mm PM in history.
    Although in fact, everything is written correctly.
    Quote: Michael Zadunaisky
    Rudolf Frommer decided to develop his next pistol with a 9x17 Browning cartridge (.380 ACP)

    Normal service (police) pistol cartridge. Not an army. From this and the pistols on this cartridge are service (police), and not army.
    Here are those that are on the cartridge 7,62x17 mm, those army service. Apparently they were armed pilots. Although due to the shortage of trunks they could be armed with anything.
    The author would also write a cycle about Kirali’s weapons. It would be interesting, Kiraly an outstanding weapon designer. Incidentally, he worked with the 9x25 mm Mauser Export cartridge. This, like the TT, is just the right caliber for the army.
    1. +1
      18 January 2017 23: 10
      hi
      Quote: JS20
      I demand to ban this article as inhumane.

      Quote: JS20
      The author would have to write a cycle about Kiraly’s weapon.

      You are a dear person you will not understand: to write or not.
      And about the development of Kiraly can write, there was such an idea. But only after I write the intended.
      1. +1
        18 January 2017 23: 30
        Quote: Mister X
        You are a dear person you will not understand: to write or not.

        Quote: JS20
        Although in fact, everything is written correctly.
    2. +1
      18 January 2017 23: 33
      Quote: JS20
      How is this so, the author questioned the "most ingenious of genius" cartridge 7,62x25 mm TT and the weapon on it.

      7,62mm TT cartridge, this is a modernized Mauser 7,63-25 cartridge. In order not to argue, here are links to comparison of cartridges.http: //grozab.livejournal.com/13263.html
      http://weaponland.ru/board/patron_762x25_tokarev_
      762x25_tt/43-1-0-223
      And where the legs grow from the cartridge 7,62X25
      1. +1
        18 January 2017 23: 36
        Quote: Amurets
        7,62mm TT cartridge, this is a modernized Mauser cartridge 7,63-25

        So what? No one argued with this. The fact is generally well known.
        And the Mauser cartridge is the development of the 7,65 mm Borchardt cartridge. Both of these cartridges for the main army pistols were not suitable and were not used. And only 7,62 mm TT cartridge in one country that surprised everyone was used as the main army pistol. Why did he fit, like a cow saddle.
        1. 0
          19 January 2017 05: 22
          Interestingly, why 7,62 * 25 is not suitable for pistols? The recoil momentum is not greater than that of 9 * 19, the initial speed is high. I don’t understand at all why it was necessary to change it to 9 * 18. Well, it’s clear that under it you can make the simplest pistol with automatic release of the free shutter, but this is hardly justified by a decrease in cartridge power. Such a cartridge would ideally fit a pistol for self-defense, and not for an army pistol.
          1. 0
            19 January 2017 06: 41
            Quote: Comrade_Stalin
            I don’t understand at all why it was necessary to change it to 9 * 18.

            During the Second World War, there were many reviews of the insufficient stopping effect of the TT bullet. What for a pistol, whose aiming range is limited to 50 meters, is a critical parameter.
            In view of the ban on the use of deformable and explosive bullets in the troops, when developing a new cartridge, they decided to increase the caliber to 9 mm, and also reduced the energy and geometric dimensions of the sleeve in order to save and reduce the impact of recoil on the shooter, which led to the use of a simpler scheme with recoil of the free shutter when creating a new army pistol.
            Alas, due to the development of personal body armor (the first serial army body armor appeared shortly after the Korean War), the cartridge had to be strengthened, but its modernization potential left much to be desired. Which in turn led to the creation of a 9 × 21mm cartridge and the adoption of the 9 × 19mm Luger cartridge ...
            Sincerely, Arthur
          2. 0
            19 January 2017 16: 11
            Quote: Comrade_Stalin
            and why 7,62 * 25 is not suitable for pistols?

            For army pistols. This is a fundamental difference.
            Quote: Comrade_Stalin
            The recoil momentum is not greater than that of 9 * 19, the initial speed is high.

            Why does not fit, it is written in the article. You have listed completely secondary factors.
            Quote: Comrade_Stalin
            I don’t understand at all why it was necessary to change it to 9 * 18.

            And I do not understand why GAU needed a sports pistol to change to a policeman. And why it was not to adopt an army pistol.
            I think this is due to incompetence. If we also take into account the 7,62x39 mm cartridge of the same time, then the version about the incompetence of conscientious "specialists" turns into unconditionally correct.
            Quote: Comrade_Stalin
            Such a cartridge would ideally fit a gun for self-defense

            Well no. Under the weapon of self-defense, the TC came up using the Browning cartridge. And the PM cartridge for self-defense was excessively powerful. Typically a police cartridge and a police pistol.
            There are no particular claims to PM, except that for some reason he was put into the army. But laughter causes APS. That monster is awkward. What the customers of this weapon were thinking about for what they planned to adapt is completely incomprehensible. In principle, APS is bad for all the tasks that come to mind.
            1. 0
              20 January 2017 01: 58
              Why does not fit, it is written in the article. You have listed completely secondary factors.

              Then you urgently need to change the calibers 7,62, 5,56 and 5,45 to 9 mm, if you think that 7,62 has insufficient OD. American "specialists" have shown their incompetence by adopting a small 5,56.
              I think this is due to incompetence. If we also take into account the 7,62x39 mm cartridge of the same time, then the version about the incompetence of conscientious "specialists" turns into unconditionally correct

              In fact, 7,62 * 39 was created based on the experience of using German 7,92 * 33. Or do you think German experts are also not competent? And what do you dislike about 7,62 * 39? It was necessary to adopt 9 * 39?
              There are no particular claims to PM, except that for some reason he was put into the army

              The desire for unification. I don’t see much wrong with this. Many as a mantra repeat that the PM is not suitable as an army pistol due to a weak cartridge, but in a real battle the pistol is useless. Is an adequate person rushing into the attack with only one gun, be he even the super-duper Glock of the latest modification? Over 50 meters, machine gunners will make a sieve out of the enemy with a gun, and they themselves will not risk it at all. The gun is needed only by staff officers and generals who are not involved in battles.
              But laughter causes APS. That monster is awkward. What the customers of this weapon were thinking about for what they planned to adapt is completely incomprehensible. In principle, APS is bad for all the tasks that come to mind.

              Well, that's why it was quickly removed from production, and then from weapons. In principle, if we had a civilian market, it would be in demand by all kinds of lovers of big guns :).
              1. 0
                20 January 2017 09: 49
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                Then urgently need to change the caliber of 7,62, 5,56 and 5,45 to 9 mm, if you think that 7,62 has insufficient OD.

                A pistol and a rifle are slightly different weapons. And his energy is different. What a powerful rifle lacks is an insufficiently low-powered pistol.
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                American "specialists" have shown their incompetence by adopting a small 5,56.

                Gradually, the entire "incompetent" world moved on to this and a similar "little girl".
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                Or do you think German experts are also not competent?

                StG44 was a special weapon for special operations. Weapons of panzergrenadiers (tank paratroopers). Those. it was not an infantry weapon, it was not a replacement for the Mausers. The AK-47 was made an infantry weapon, although in terms of performance characteristics it was not suitable for this. This is the cant.
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                And what do you dislike about 7,62 * 39?

                For an infantry cartridge it is low power. This is a special cartridge for special operations. He has the right to life, but should be issued in negligible quantities.
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                It was necessary to adopt 9 * 39?

                For rifles, such a kalibo is excessive. Do not forget, an army pistol "fights" at 50 m, an army rifle at 400-450 m.
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                but in real combat the gun is useless

                The army pistol is an extremely powerful and dangerous individual weapon. However, in the USSR they did not know such, because the first army pistol appeared only in the army of the Russian Federation (PY). Hence the stories about "shoot yourself" and others.
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                The desire for unification. I don’t see much wrong with this.

                Army and police weapons have different tasks. The police pistol should fix, but not destroy. Army, destroy, but how, no matter.
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                The gun is needed only by staff officers and generals who are not involved in battles.

                For these categories there is a service and special weapon. These are also pistols, but not army.
                Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                Is an adequate person rushing into the attack with only one gun, be he even the super-duper Glock of the latest modification?

                Why doesn't the officer "rush"? His task is to lead the battle, and not to defeat the enemy with small arms. Although, of course, just in case, it would not hurt him to have a light PC on hand. But the machine gun, even AKSU is excessive. A squire must be attached to it.
                1. 0
                  20 January 2017 10: 04
                  StG44 was a special weapon for special operations. Weapons of panzergrenadiers (tank paratroopers). Those. it was not an infantry weapon, it was not a replacement for the Mausers. The AK-47 was made an infantry weapon, although in terms of performance characteristics it was not suitable for this. This is the cant.

                  That is, the M4 is also conceptually a weapon for panzergrenadiers? That is, the Yankees did a stupid thing by replacing their M14 with farts of 5,56 caliber? If for you even 7,62 * 39 low-power cartridge for infantry ...
                  For rifles, such a kalibo is excessive. Do not forget, an army pistol "fights" at 50 m, an army rifle at 400-450 m.

                  Yes, no one is fighting with a gun. The gun is the most useless firearm on the battlefield.
                  Army pistol is an extremely powerful and dangerous individual weapon

                  Actually, AK is also an individual weapon. Compare the capabilities of the AK and the gun is ridiculous.
                  For these categories there is a service and special weapon. These are also pistols, but not army.

                  In fact, for generals and staff officers, a gun is just a decoration, like a dagger for naval officers. And so the smaller and lighter the gun, the better for them. No wonder the generals created PSM. And in case of an enemy breakthrough, they always have automatic machines hidden.
                  Why doesn't the officer "rush"? His task is to lead the battle, and not to defeat the enemy with small arms. Although, of course, just in case, it would not hurt him to have a light PC on hand. But the machine gun, even AKSU is excessive. A squire must be attached to it.

                  Look at the standard weapons of the MS platoon. Even the state platoon commander relies on AK.
                  1. 0
                    20 January 2017 18: 40
                    Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                    That is, the M4 is also conceptually a weapon for panzergrenadiers?

                    Not at all. Army service weapon. Replace it soon. I think, and M16 after that will not be easy.
                    Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                    That is, the Yankees did a stupid thing by replacing their M14 with farts of 5,56 caliber? If for you even 7,62 * 39 low-power cartridge for infantry ...

                    Do not confuse 7,62x39 mm and 5,56x45 mm cartridges. They have a completely different principle of action. And from this they need completely different power.
                    Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                    Yes, no one is fighting with a gun. The gun is the most useless firearm on the battlefield.

                    Soviet gun. A normal army pistol (PY) at a range of up to 50 m with a quality hit from you will leave one memory.
                    For reference, neither TT nor PM possess such qualities.
                    Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                    Actually, AK is also an individual weapon. Compare the capabilities of the AK and the gun is ridiculous.

                    Of course. But an army pistol is the weapon of a commander (officer). But AK weapons ... well, let's not talk about that. But NOT a commander.
                    Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                    In fact, for generals and staff officers, a gun is just a decoration, like a dagger for naval officers.

                    Remember the summer of 1941. Although, I repeat, for staff officers and generals there is official and special army weapons (pistols).
                    Quote: Comrade_Stalin
                    even the platoon commander in the state relies on AK.

                    This is because the PM is in no way suitable for the army.
                    1. 0
                      21 January 2017 00: 14
                      A gun is a gun. A useless bullet that is needed only as a self-defense for the civilian population. And for staff as decoration, like a dagger for sailors.
      2. +1
        19 January 2017 00: 22
        Quote: Amurets
        Here are links to comparing patrons.http: //grozab.livejournal.com/13263.html

        Funny A video review of the 29M pistol was also conducted by Grozab (Oleg Grobstein).
        1. 0
          19 January 2017 05: 56
          Nothing unusual. The community of people who are really passionate about weapons, and not just using them, has always been relatively small (Alas and Ah!). With the motorcycle community the same story ...
          Regards and greetings to the neighbors from Odessa, Arthur

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"